Academic literature on the topic 'Objective of financial statements'

PurposeThe main objective of the present study is to assess the potential impact of readability of financial statement notes on the auditor's report lag, audit fees and going concern opinion (GCO).Design/methodology/approachThe statistical population of this study includes all listed firms on the Tehran Stock Exchange (TSE) for the period of 2012–2017. The systematic elimination method is used for sampling and multiple regression and EViews software are used for testing the hypothesis models.FindingsThe obtained results show that there is a significant and positive relationship between audit report lags and readability of financial statements. Moreover, it is also revealed that readability of financial statements is positively associated with audit fees. Furthermore, the findings suggest a negative correlation between readability indexes and issuing GCOs, denoting hard-to-read statements is considered as a risk factor by auditors. Finally, the observations of our robustness tests suggest that the association between audit report lag and readability of financial statements is robust.Originality/valueThis is the first conducted investigation concerning auditor's response to the readability of financial statement notes in TSE. The outcome of current paper may pave the way for revising and developing Iranian accounting standards in order to give a fairer and clearer picture of financial reports.

The objective of the empirical study is to examine liquidity (CR), profitability (ROA), reputation of accountant public firms (KAP), public ownership and audit opinion towards the timeliness of delivering financial statement. This research is using 63 manufacturing companies which listed in Indonesian Stock Exchange from period 2008 – 2010. In this data analysis the technique used is logistic regression to test: an overall model fit by using the -2Log Likelihood, assess the feasibility of a regression model using the Hosmer and Lemeshow's Goodness of fit, Cox and Snell's R Square and Nagelkerke's R Square and parameter estimation and interpretation using the classification table. The results from this study are (1) liquidity had no significant influence to the timeliness of delivering financial statements (2) profitability had no significant influence to the timeliness of delivering financial statements (3) reputation of accountant public firms (KAP) had no significant influence to the timeliness of delivering financial statements (4) public ownership had no significant influence to the timeliness of delivering financial statement (5) audit opinion had no significant influence to the timeliness of delivering financial statement (6) liquidity (CR), profitability (ROA), reputation of accountant public firms (KAP), public ownership and audit opinion had significant influence to the timeliness of delivering financial statement.
 Keyword: Liquidity, Profitability, Reputation of accountant public firms (KAP), Shareholder’s dispersion, Audit opinion, Timeliness of delivering financial statement.

Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to examine and depict the advantages and disadvantages connected to the fair value, providing the reader with objective information and thorough insight into the problems and benefits of fair value. Partial objectives of this paper are to define the concept of fair value, to provide information about theoretical background and evolution of fair value and to examine and describe the possible future development of fair value. Design/methodology/approach – Findings in the paper are based on study of existing literature and also on study using the open-ended approach of grounded theory, including 50 interviews and two group discussions with professional accountants dealing with the fair value accounting in practice. Findings – According to the advantages and disadvantages of the concept of fair value in accounting, it is quite obvious and clear that this concept is far from being perfect. It is very difficult to determine whether its contribution to the improvement of accounting is really beneficial. Although the fair-value discussion seems to be far from over now, the current crisis provided an interesting setting to further explore these issues, understand them better and hopefully urge responsible institutions to fix the imperfections within the system to make it work correctly and more effectively. Research limitations/implications – Because of the chosen research approach, the research results may lack generalisability. Therefore, researchers are encouraged to test the proposed propositions further. Practical implications – This paper highlights that historical cost and fair value accounting must not be considered as competitors, as they serve different purposes. Knowledge of fair value is important, although it is not enough. Users also need to know the cost of the investment. In fact, knowing how much resources have been sacrificed to obtain that fair value, they could effectively evaluate stewardship. As a consequence, the adoption of a dual measurement and reporting system should be considered and discussed at a standard setting level. Originality/value – This paper fulfils an identified need to study how fair value accounting can be useful in the future.

SYNOPSIS: The Financial Accounting Standards Board and the International Accounting Standards Board (hereafter, the Boards) issued the discussion paper Preliminary Views on Financial Statement Presentation in late 2008. The Boards propose to significantly reconfigure the presentation of financial statements to offer parallel statements with standardized partitions of each financial statement into five categories: business activities, financing activities, income taxes, discontinued operations, and equity. The allocation of transactions within these partitions will depend crucially on management’s assessment of each transaction (i.e., the management approach). In this paper we comment on the proposal, with particular emphasis on empirical evidence and relevant theories from academic research. We highlight benefits of the proposed changes as well as some possible concerns. We conclude that the objective of providing a cohesive picture of activities through a uniform standardization of each financial statement by activity is desirable, but the proposed criteria for how activities are categorized results in potentially aberrant or confusing outcomes. Thus, any dissatisfaction with the current financial statement format may be replaced with other criticisms. Finally, the current proposal relies on the effectiveness of the management approach, which can only be successful if managers embrace the proposed structure.