Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Opinion advisory / Journal articles

To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Opinion advisory.

Journal articles on the topic 'Opinion advisory'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2021

Last updated: 4 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Opinion advisory.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Paprocka, Ada, and Michał Ziółkowski. "Advisory opinions under Protocol No. 16 to the European Convention on Human Rights." European Constitutional Law Review 11, no. 2 (2015): 274–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1574019615000176.

Full text

Abstract:

European Court of Human Rights – Protocol No. 16 to the European Convention on Human Rights – Protocol No. 16 as part of the European Court of Human Rights reform – Advisory opinions under Protocol No. 16 – Authority requesting an advisory opinion – The subject matter of an advisory opinion – Legal consequences of advisory opinions

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Espinoza Bautista, Josselyn. "Human rights as a protection mechanism for the environment: is it possible to include IACHR’s Advisory Opinion 23/17 in the Ecuadorian legal system?" USFQ Law Review 6, no. 1 (2019): 19. http://dx.doi.org/10.18272/lr.v6i1.1398.

Full text

Abstract:

The Inter-American Court of Human Rights, on November 15th of 2017, issued an Advisory Opinion on the environment and human rights. The relevance of this Opinion is reflected in the development made by the Court on state obligations in relation to the environment. The Court recognized the “undeniable relationship between the protection of the environment and the realization of other human rights”. In this virtue, this article seeks to scrutinize and synthesize the foundations of the Advisory Opinion. Finally, since advisory opinions are not binding nor obligatory for Ecuador (or any other stat

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Savoie, Pierre-Olivier. "The ICJ, Advisory Opinions, and the Judicial Function: Between Adjudication and Consultation." Canadian Yearbook of international Law/Annuaire canadien de droit international 42 (2005): 35–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0069005800008493.

Full text

Abstract:

SummaryLegal commentators have not always considered advisory opinions as a legitimate judicial function. Under both national and international law, it is often considered that only ripe controversies can be legitimately decided by a court of law. Under international law, advisory opinions are also criticized for undermining sovereignty when consent is not obtained from all states affected by the matter. By examining the International Court of Justice’s (ICJ) advisory opinions in light of comparative law, the author argues that this criticism underestimates the evolution of the judicial functi

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

VIDMAR, JURE. "The Kosovo Advisory Opinion Scrutinized." Leiden Journal of International Law 24, no. 2 (2011): 355–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0922156511000057.

Full text

Abstract:

AbstractIn the Kosovo Advisory Opinion, the International Court of Justice took the position that Kosovo's unilateral declaration of independence did not violate any applicable rules of international law. This article does not dispute the final finding, but rather critically examines the Court's somewhat controversial reasoning and considers the added value of the opinion for the clarification of legal doctrine in relation to unilateral declarations of independence. An argument is made that the Court's interpretation of the question and the identification of the authors of the declaration had

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Mejía-Lemos, Diego. "Advisory Opinion OC-22/16." American Journal of International Law 111, no. 4 (2017): 1000–1006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2017.91.

Full text

Abstract:

On February 26, 2016, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (Court) issued an advisory opinion requested by the Republic of Panama (Advisory Opinion). The request stemmed from “doubts among States” as to whether “legal persons, being legal fictions, are not as such entitled to rights” (Request) (para. 2). The Court unanimously held that legal persons are not entitled to rights under the American Convention on Human Rights (Convention) because Article 1.2 of the Convention establishes rights only in favor of natural persons. The Court, also unanimously, reiterated that indigenous and tribal

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Orakhelashvili, Alexander. "Kosovo: The Post-advisory Opinion Stage." International Journal on Minority and Group Rights 22, no. 4 (2015): 486–510. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15718115-02204003.

Full text

Abstract:

The Unilateral Declaration of Independence by Kosovar authorities in Pristina in 2008 has generated heavy legal and political controversies. The delivery by the International Court of Justice of its advisory opinion on Kosovo unilateral declaration of independence in 2010 has not led to the elimination of unilateralist positions as to Kosovo’s status. Such unilateralist approach, favouring Kosovo’s independence either in principle or in practice, has since been adopted by the local Kosovar authorities, a number of governments and by the European Union. This contribution addresses the merit of

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Tanaka, Yoshifumi. "Reflections on the Advisory Jurisdiction of itlos as a Full Court: The itlos Advisory Opinion of 2015." Law and Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 14, no. 2 (2015): 318–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15718034-12341296.

Full text

Abstract:

In its advisory opinion of 2 April 2015, the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (itlos) broke new ground in the itlos jurisprudence, by stating that the full Tribunal has an advisory jurisdiction. However, the legal basis of the advisory jurisdiction of itlos as a full court is not free from controversy. An issue also arises with regard to the admissibility of the request for an advisory opinion. Given that the itlos jurisprudence concerning advisory proceedings is still in its early stages, the advisory jurisdiction of itlos as a full court deserves serious consideration. Thus, thi

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Zarikyan, Karen Barseghi. "THE ROLE OF DOMESTIC AUTHORITIES IN EFFECTIVE APPLICATION OF ADVISORY OPINION PROCEDURE UNDER THE PROTOCOL № 16 TO THE CONVENTION FOR THE PROTECTION OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND FUNDAMENTAL FREEDOMS." Administrative law and process, no. 3(26) (2019): 126–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.17721/2227-796x.2019.3.08.

Full text

Abstract:

The purpose of the article is to underline that the comprehensive implementation of the Protocol № 16 to the Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms depends on the appropriate efforts of the member States. Both the parliaments and the highest courts of the member States should take certain measures to achieve the goals persuaded by the Protocol. Thus, it is important to examine the risks of the Protocol’s implementation to find out what specific activity should be performed by the member States to minimize problems and provide for maximum benefits. In particular,

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Polonskaya, Ksenia. "International Court of Justice: The Role of Consent in the Context of Judicial Propriety Deconstructed in Light of Chagos Archipelago." Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 18, no. 2 (2019): 189–218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15718034-12341400.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract This article examines the notion of consent as an element of judicial propriety as defined by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) in the context of its advisory function. The article situates the issue of judicial propriety within a broader conversation on the Court’s normative outlooks in international law, and examines the most recent advisory opinion on the Chagos Archipelago to understand how the Court itself views its role in international law. The article concludes that the Court’s advisory opinions do not provide much clarity as to the circumstances in which a lack of cons

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Pastukhova, L. V., and A. P. Shumilenko. "The Role of the Permanent Court of International Justice (PCIJ) in the Formation of Advisory Competence of International Judicial Bodies." Rossijskoe pravosudie 5 (May 25, 2021): 57–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.37399/issn2072-909x.2021.5.57-66.

Full text

Abstract:

The article is dedicated to the analysis of the role of the Permanent Court of International Justice (PCIJ) in the formation of the advisory competence of modern international judicial bodies. Тhe authors emphasize the historical connection named after of the corresponding articles of the Covenant of the League of Nations, the Statute of the Court (PCIJ) and the Rules of Court (PCIJ). We present a list of reasons for rejection of the request for an advisory opinion; the authors analyze to what extent are states bound by the advisory opinions. A special attention is paid to the review of the pr

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

11

Lapidoth, Ruth. "The Advisory Opinion and the Jewish Settlements." Israel Law Review 38, no. 1-2 (2005): 292–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0021223700012711.

Full text

Abstract:

This paper argues that the ICJ did not need to discuss the legality of the settlements in order to examine the legality of the fence. Following this argument, until the settlement issue is resolved, Israel has an obligation to protect the settlers. Thus, even those parts of the fence that are intended to protect settlements, legality does not depend on the legality of the settlements. Moreover, this article argues that the Court's analysis of the settlements' legality is unsatisfactory: its interpretation of Article 49, paragraph 6, of the Fourth 1949 Geneva Convention, deviates to a certain e

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

12

Gao, Jianjun. "The ITLOS Advisory Opinion for the SRFC." Chinese Journal of International Law 14, no. 4 (2015): 735–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/chinesejil/jmv046.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

13

Azab, Ahmad. "Fatwa (Advisory Legal Opinion) Issues and Judgments." Journal of King Abdulaziz University-Arts and Humanities 17, no. 1 (2009): 471–518. http://dx.doi.org/10.4197/art.17-1.10.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

14

Oellers-Frahm, Karin. "Lawmaking Through Advisory Opinions?" German Law Journal 12, no. 5 (2011): 1033–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s2071832200017211.

Full text

Abstract:

International courts and tribunals are firstly and particularly conceived to settle legal disputes between States and/or other organs or individuals admitted as parties according to the statute of the respective court by means of a binding decision. An advisory function is not inherent in the function of a judicial body, but has to be transferred expressly upon a court or tribunal in the constituent instrument. For non-standing judicial bodies, i.e., arbitral tribunals, an advisory function is rather unusual, but not altogether ruled out: The parties to acompromismay empower the tribunal to gi

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

15

Allen, Stephen. "SELF-DETERMINATION, THE CHAGOS ADVISORY OPINION AND THE CHAGOSSIANS." International and Comparative Law Quarterly 69, no. 1 (2019): 203–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0020589319000526.

Full text

Abstract:

AbstractIn its Chagos Advisory Opinion, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) ruled that the UK's detachment of the Chagos Archipelago from the colony of Mauritius on the eve of independence constituted a violation of customary international law (CIL). This article analyses the Court's approach to establishing the emergence and content of the right to self-determination in this frustrated case of decolonisation. It goes on to examine the argument that self-determination's peremptory character has decisive consequences in this specific context—a contention which found favour with several jud

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

16

McCormack, Timothy L. H. "A non liquet on nuclear weapons — The ICJ avoids the application of general principles of international humanitarian law." International Review of the Red Cross 37, no. 316 (1997): 76–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0020860400084321.

Full text

Abstract:

The Advisory Opinion delivered by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on the legality of the Threat or Use of Nuclear Weapons was a somewhat disappointing if not entirely unexpected decision. After the final paragraph, which constitutes the dispositif, all fourteen judges appended either personal declarations, separate opinions or dissenting opinions to indicate the extent to which they agreed or disagreed with specific findings and particular aspects of the reasoning behind the Opinion.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

17

Kretzmer, David. "The Advisory Opinion: The Light Treatment of International Humanitarian Law." American Journal of International Law 99, no. 1 (2005): 88–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3246092.

Full text

Abstract:

Ever since the occupation of the West Bank and Gaza began in 1967, the Supreme Court of Israel has entertained petitions challenging actions of the Israeli authorities in those territories. The Court has delivered dozens of judgments in which it addressed questions of international humanitarian law in a situation of belligerent occupation. For a long time the Supreme Court was the sole judicial actor in this sphere. While its judgments were subjected to scrutiny and criticism by academics, no other judicial organs, domestic or international, ruled on the difficult legal issues discussed by the

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

18

Giannopoulos, Christos. "Considerations on Protocol N°16: Can the New Advisory Competence of the European Court of Human Rights Breathe New Life into the European Convention on Human Rights?" German Law Journal 16, no. 2 (2015): 337–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s2071832200020873.

Full text

Abstract:

Protocol n°16 expands the advisory jurisdiction of the European Court of Human Rights (hereinafter ECtHR) by introducing a mechanism of litigation-related opinions (“avis contentieux”). It affords the highest national courts and tribunals the ability to ask the ECtHR for an advisory opinion on questions of principle related to the interpretation and application of the rights and freedoms defined in the European Convention on Human Rights (hereinafter Convention) and the Protocols thereto.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

19

Falk, Richard. "The Kosovo Advisory Opinion: Conflict Resolution and Precedent." American Journal of International Law 105, no. 1 (2011): 50–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.5305/amerjintelaw.105.1.0050.

Full text

Abstract:

The somewhat surprising majority view in the advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) assessing Kosovo's declaration of independence has some bearingon prospects for an eventual end to the bitter conflict between Kosovo and Serbia. It may also have some relevance for a variety of political movements around the world whose leaders might be more inclined than previously to tempt fate by declaring their people and territory to be internationally independent of the sovereign state within which they are now geographically located. Significantly,the ICJ majority sidestepped the q

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

20

Bordin, Fernando Lusa. "RECKONING WITH BRITISH COLONIALISM: THE CHAGOS ADVISORY OPINION." Cambridge Law Journal 78, no. 02 (2019): 253–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0008197319000473.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

21

SFIKAS, PETER M. "Update: CREDENTIALS AND ADVISORY OPINION 5.I.1." Journal of the American Dental Association 130, no. 10 (1999): 1512–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.14219/jada.archive.1999.0067.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

22

Papantoniou, Angeliki. "Advisory Opinion on the Environment and Human Rights." American Journal of International Law 112, no. 3 (2018): 460–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2018.54.

Full text

Abstract:

On November 15, 2017, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (Court) rendered a historic advisory opinion (Advisory Opinion) on the relationship between human rights and the environment. The opinion was a response to a request from Colombia regarding extraterritorial jurisdiction of state parties to the American Convention, in particular their obligations under the rights to life and personal integrity, arising from the construction and operation of large-scale infrastructure projects in the Greater Caribbean region. Colombia's concern was that, due to their dimensions and permanence, such p

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

23

Siwior, Przemysław. "The Inter-American Court of Human Rights Advisory Opinion OC-23/17 on the Relationship between Human Rights and the Environment." Review of European and Comparative Law 46, no. 3 (2021): 177–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.31743/recl.11915.

Full text

Abstract:

On 15 November 2017, the Inter-American Court of Human Rights issued an advisory opinion OC-23/17 on the relationship between human rights and the environment. The opinion responded to a request made by Colombia pursuant to Article 64(1) of the American Convention on Human Rights regarding extraterritorial jurisdiction of state parties to the Convention resulting from mega-infrastructure projects in the Greater Caribbean region. The purpose of this article is to discuss the general issues dealt with by the Court, concentrating on the significance of this Advisory Opinion for internationa

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

24

Ilham Mirzamammadova, Gulzada. "THE OBLIGATIONS OF DEVELOPING AND DEVELOPED STATES IN RESPECT TO ENVIRONMENTAL ISSUES WITHIN UNCLOS." SCIENTIFIC WORK 66, no. 05 (2021): 233–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.36719/2663-4619/66/233-236.

Full text

Abstract:

This article discusses one of the major concerns of the ISA which is to provide the marine environment is protected from harmful effects that may occur during mining activities in the Area. In 2011, the ITLOS Seabed Disputes Chambers, at the request of the Council of the ISA, ensured its first advisory opinion regarding the responsibilities and obligations of States and their sponsored entities with regard to activities in the Area. It will be explored some of the implications of the Advisory Opinion of the Chambers on developing States herein. Key words: United Nations Convention on the Law o

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

25

Folk, Richard A. "Toward Authoritativeness: The ICJ Ruling on Israel’s Security Wall." American Journal of International Law 99, no. 1 (2005): 42–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3246088.

Full text

Abstract:

On July 9, 2004, the International Court of Justice issued its advisory opinion on the legal consequences of Israel’s construction of a security wall on occupied Palestinian territory, declaring that the wall was in violation of international law. The advisory opinion also indicated that Israel should forthwith cease construction of the wall, dismantle what had been so far constructed, and make reparations to the Palestinians for all damages caused by the project. On July 20, 2004, at the Tenth Emergency Session of the General Assembly, Resolution ES-10/15 was adopted by a vote of 150 in favor

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

26

Carrillo-Santarelli, Nicolás. "Gender Identity, and Equality and Non-discrimination of Same Sex Couples." American Journal of International Law 112, no. 3 (2018): 479–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ajil.2018.51.

Full text

Abstract:

In its advisory opinion, OC-24/17 (Advisory Opinion), the Inter-American Court of Human Rights (IACtHR or Court) addressed globally debated issues concerning gender identity, same-sex relationships, and the rights of LGBTI persons. As discussed below, the Court reached conclusions more progressive than those of its European counterpart, due to its finding that the principle of individual autonomy is embedded in the foundations of human rights law and permeates individual self-determination, the free development of one's personality, and the protection of different models of the family. In line

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

27

Weismann, Paul. "Peoples’ Right to Self-Determination." International Community Law Review 21, no. 5 (2019): 463–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/18719732-12341414.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract The Chagos Archipelago is a small group of islands and atolls in the Indian Ocean which traditionally has belonged to Mauritius. In 1965, when Mauritius was still a colony of the UK, the Chagos Archipelago was detached from Mauritius and the UK allowed the US to establish a military base on this territory. These occurrences have been highly disputed ever since. In February 2019, the International Court of Justice (ICJ), upon request by the UN General Assembly, has rendered its Advisory Opinion on a number of legal issues concerning the case. This contribution aims at presenting and di

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

28

Doswald-Beck, Louise. "International humanitarian law and the Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice on the legality of the threat or use of nuclear weapons." International Review of the Red Cross 37, no. 316 (1997): 35–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0020860400084291.

Full text

Abstract:

The Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice represents the first time that the Court's judges have been called upon to analyse in some detail rules of international humanitarian law. Other instances, for example, the Nicaragua case, involved nowhere near such an extensive analysis. The Advisory Opinion is therefore of particular interest in that it contains important findings on the customary nature of a number of humanitarian law rules and interesting pronouncements on the interpretation of these rules and their relationship with other rules. Most judges based their final decis

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

29

Muharremi, Robert. "A Note on the ICJ Advisory Opinion on Kosovo." German Law Journal 11, no. 7-8 (2010): 867–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s2071832200018885.

Full text

Abstract:

On 22 July 2010, the International Court of Justice (hereinafter the “ICJ”) delivered its advisory opinion on the accordance with international law of the unilateral declaration of independence in respect of Kosovo. The ICJ concluded that the declaration of independence dated 17 February 2008 did not violate any applicable rule of international law consisting of general international law, UNSC resolution 1244 (1999) (hereinafter the “Resolution 1244”) and the Constitutional Framework for Provisional Self-Government in Kosovo (hereinafter the “Constitutional Framework”). The ICJ delivered the a

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

30

McCorquodale, Robert, Jennifer Robinson, and Nicola Peart. "TERRITORIAL INTEGRITY AND CONSENT IN THE CHAGOS ADVISORY OPINION." International and Comparative Law Quarterly 69, no. 1 (2020): 221–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0020589319000551.

Full text

Abstract:

AbstractA key element of the right to self-determination is territorial integrity. This has usually been considered solely in relation to the territorial integrity of an existing State seeking to resist claims by peoples for the right to self-determination. Yet the Chagos Opinion by the International Court of Justice examines a different type of territorial integrity—that of the colonial territory itself. This article explores the consequence of the Court's view that the territorial integrity of the colonial territory is a matter of customary international law, and that any division, integrati

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

31

Feldkamp, Janet K. "Advisory Opinion Addresses Feasibility of Providing Free Local Transportation." Caring for the Ages 10, no. 6 (2009): 18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1526-4114(09)60159-1.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

32

Niewenhous, M. Daria, Deborah A. Daccord, and Melissa O'Neill. "OIG Issues Advisory Opinion on Joint Venture Buy-Outs." Oncology Issues 22, no. 5 (2007): 17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10463356.2007.11883354.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

33

Gabriel, Kathleen. "Fraud and Abuse: OIG Advisory Opinion No. 00-3." Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics 28, no. 2 (2000): 193–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-720x.2000.tb00014.x.

Full text

Abstract:

The Office of the Inspector General issued an advisory opinion in April announcing that an arrangement to provide various services free of charge to patients with terminal illnesses who have a prognosis of one year or less to live (the “Program”) does not constitute grounds for sanctions under either the anti-kickback statute, section 1128(b) of the Social Security Act, or under section 1128A(a)(5) of the Act, which prohibits offering of inducements to beneficiaries to influence their selection of a provider for Medicare or Medicaid covered services.The Hospice Foundation of Martin & St. L

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

34

Georgiadou, Stella. "The Law and Politics of the Kosovo Advisory Opinion." Europe-Asia Studies 68, no. 6 (2016): 1100–1101. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09668136.2016.1202532.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

35

Stojanowska, Wanda. "DOWÓD Z OPINII RODZINNEGO OŚRODKA DIAGNOSTYCZNO-KONSULTACYJNEGO W SPRAWACH O ROZWÓD I JEGO WPŁYW NA TREŚĆ WYROKU W ŚWIETLE WYNIKÓW BADAŃ AKTOWYCH." Zeszyty Prawnicze 2, no. 1 (2017): 7. http://dx.doi.org/10.21697/zp.2012.2.1.01.

Full text

Abstract:

THE OPINION OF THE FAMILY DIAGNOSTIC-ADVISORY CENTRE AS THE EVIDENCE IN DIVORCE CASES AND ITS INFLUENCE ON JUDGEMENTS (IN THE LIGHT OF C OURT RECORDS)Summary The present article contains results of studies conducted in the Institute of Justice in Warsaw. Basis for the research was 100 judgments in divorce cases by Polish provincial courts from 1997 to 1998. Each of the examined judgments was done after hearing by court of the Family Diagnostic - Advisory Centre (FDAC) opinion in cases including decision as to the guilt for breaking up of marriage and subsequent granting of the paternal authori

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

36

Donadio, Luciano, and Carlos Espósito. "Inter-jurisdictional Co-operation in the MERCOSUR: The First Request for an Advisory Opinion of the MERCOSUR’s Permanent Review Tribunal by Argentina’s Supreme Court of Justice." Law & Practice of International Courts and Tribunals 10, no. 2 (2011): 261–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157180311x582152.

Full text

Abstract:

AbstractThis comment discusses the request for an advisory opinion that originated in the case Sancor c/ Dirección General de Aduanas. This case emerged from the resolution of the Argentine Ministry of Economy which set export duties of 5% to certain milk products, without discriminating with regard to the destination of them, i.e. including members as well as non-members of the Southern Common Market (MERCOSUR). In this way, and after a long judicial process, in October 2009 Argentina’s Supreme Court of Justice (CSJN) requested an advisory opinion from the Permanent Review Tribunal of the MER

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

37

-. "Agreed recommendations on the use of FDC budesonide/formoterol in a single inhaler (SMART) for the treatment of patients with bronchial asthma." Russian Journal of Allergy 13, no. 3 (2016): 15–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.36691/rja355.

Full text

Abstract:

Conclusion paragraphs were discussed at the Advisory Board and adopted by majority of votes during voting. After Advisory Board the initiative group edited the draft opinion in accordance with the received comments and suggestions. The final draft of conclusion has been agreed by all experts of the Advisory Board.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

38

Gavouneli, Maria. "Request for an Advisory Opinion Submitted by the Sub-Regional Fisheries Commission (SRFC) (ITLOS)." International Legal Materials 54, no. 5 (2015): 890–926. http://dx.doi.org/10.5305/intelegamate.54.5.0890.

Full text

Abstract:

On April 2, 2015, the International Tribunal for the Law of the Sea (ITLOS) rendered its first ever advisory opinion by the full Tribunal in response to a request for an advisory opinion submitted by the Sub-Regional Fisheries Commission (SRFC), a regional fisheries organization comprised of seven West-African States. The Tribunal was asked to address four substantive questions relating to the obligations of the flag and coastal states regarding fisheries management and the ensuing responsibility of both states and competent organizations for illegal, unreported, and unregulated (IUU) fishing.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

39

van den Driest, Simone F. "From Kosovo to Crimea and Beyond: On Territorial Integrity, Unilateral Secession and Legal Neutrality in International Law." International Journal on Minority and Group Rights 22, no. 4 (2015): 467–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15718115-02204002.

Full text

Abstract:

In the aftermath of the Ukrainian Revolution, Ukraine’s autonomous region of Crimea declared independence and filed an application to subsequently join the Russian Federation. In seeking to justify these acts, both the Crimean authorities and the Russian Federation referred to international law, including the International Court of Justice’s Advisory Opinion on Kosovo’s unilateral declaration of independence. In this Advisory Opinion, the Court indeed found that the principle of territorial integrity merely applies in the relationship between States and concluded that general international law

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

40

Aljaghoub, Mahasen. "The Absence of State Consent to Advisory Opinions of the International Court of Justice: Judicial and Political Restraints." Arab Law Quarterly 24, no. 2 (2010): 191–207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157302510x497330.

Full text

Abstract:

The International Court of Justice (ICJ) is the principal judicial organ of the United Nations, (UN) and its Statute is an integral part of the UN's Charter. The court's integral role within the UN has largely been misunderstood especially in the way the court has viewed its advisory jurisdiction. The ICJ always asserts that the delivery of an advisory opinion represents its participation in the UN's work and thus, in the absence of compelling reasons, a request for an opinion ought not to be refused. Some commentators note that the principle that the ICJ must participate in the work of the Or

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

41

Kirgis, Frederic L. "He Got It Almost Right." AJIL Unbound 108 (2014): 116–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s2398772300001987.

Full text

Abstract:

Larry Johnson’s answer to his own question is a qualified “no.” Surely he is correct when he says that the General Assembly does not need the Uniting for Peace resolution in order to consider a matter that is on the UN Security Council’s agenda. The International Court of Justice made that clear in its Advisory Opinion on the Construction of a Wall. It is only when the Security Council is actively pursuing the matter that UN Charter Article 12(1) requires the General Assembly to defer to the Council.Johnson is also correct when he says that Uniting for Peace does not serve to enhance the autho

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

42

Žuber, Bruna, and Špela Lovšin. "Judicial dialogue in the light of Protocol no. 16 to the European convention on human rights." Zbornik Pravnog fakulteta Sveučilišta u Rijeci 40, no. 2 (2019): 899–925. http://dx.doi.org/10.30925/zpfsr.40.2.10.

Full text

Abstract:

The authors discuss legal nature of the Protocol No. 16 to the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR) which entered into force on 1 August 2018. With the aim of improving the judicial dialogue between European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) and highest national courts, the Protocol No. 16 introduced the advisory opinion procedure at the ECtHR level. A detailed analysis of the impact of advisory opinion procedure on the judicial dialogue is included and is further supported by the reviews of cases at the ECtHR against Slovenia, Belgium and Italy, which illustrate how a possibility to request

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

43

KATTAN, Victor. "The Chagos Advisory Opinion and the Law of Self-Determination." Asian Journal of International Law 10, no. 1 (2019): 12–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s2044251319000195.

Full text

Abstract:

AbstractThe Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice [ICJ] on the Separation of the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius in 1965 has been hailed as a major victory by the government of Mauritius and by representatives of the Chagossians who were forcibly removed from the islands to make way for the establishment of an American military facility on the island of Diego Garcia at the height of the Cold War. The opinion was categorical: the process of decolonization of Mauritius was not lawfully completed when that country acceded to independence in 1968. The UK lost on every single arg

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

44

Ingravallo, Ivan. "Kosovo after the ICJ Advisory Opinion: Towards a European Perspective?" International Community Law Review 14, no. 3 (2012): 219–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/187197312x650523.

Full text

Abstract:

Abstract The article deals with the advisory opinion given on 22 July 2010 by the International Court of Justice (ICJ) on the accordance with international law of the declaration of independence from Serbia adopted by Kosovo authorities on 17 February 2008. The advisory opinion is critically examined in the light of international law and of United Nations Security Council resolution 1244 (1999). The responsibilities of the European Union in Kosovo are also scrutinized, with regard to the mandate of EULEX Kosovo, the role of the EU as a facilitator of the dialogue between Belgrade and Pristina,

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

45

Gao, J. "The Responsibilities and Obligations of the Sponsoring States Advisory Opinion." Chinese Journal of International Law 12, no. 4 (2013): 771–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/chinesejil/jmt037.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

46

PETERS, ANNE. "Does Kosovo Lie in the Lotus-Land of Freedom?" Leiden Journal of International Law 24, no. 1 (2011): 95–108. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0922156510000622.

Full text

Abstract:

AbstractThis paper finds that the ICJ's Kosovo Advisory Opinion reached the right result, but in a methodologically not fully satisfactory way. It examines five aspects that underpin the opinion: the temporal (purely ex post) perspective; the Court's equation of legal conformity and non-prohibition and the idea of a deliberate silence of international law; the applicability of the Lotus principle that was evoked by numerous states in the proceedings; the structural analogies between international law and private, criminal, or public law; and the oscillation between legal positivist and jusnatu

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

47

Arp, Björn. "The ICJ Advisory Opinion on theAccordance with International Law of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence in Respect of Kosovoand the International Protection of Minorities." German Law Journal 11, no. 7-8 (2010): 847–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s2071832200018873.

Full text

Abstract:

Very seldom has a judgment or advisory opinion of the International Court of Justice (ICJ) received so much media coverage as the recent Advisory Opinion on theAccordance with International Law of the Unilateral Declaration of Independence in Respect of Kosovorendered on 22 July 2010 in response to a question posed by the General Assembly. The question had been forwarded on behalf of a request by Serbia and was phrased in the following way: “Is the unilateral declaration of independence by the Provisional Institutions of Self-Government of Kosovo in accordance with international law?”

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

48

Allen, Stephen. "Legal Consequences of the Separation of the Chagos Archipelago from Mauritius in 1965 (I.C.J.)." International Legal Materials 58, no. 3 (2019): 445–602. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/ilm.2019.22.

Full text

Abstract:

In its Chagos Advisory Opinion, the International Court of Justice (ICJ) addressed two questions posed in a request from the UN General Assembly. First, had Mauritius's decolonization been completed when it gained independence in 1968, after the excision of the Chagos Archipelago? Second, what were the legal consequences flowing from the United Kingdom's continued administration of the Archipelago? It was thought that the Court might shy away from giving an Opinion in this case as, arguably, it concerned a bilateral sovereignty dispute that the United Kingdom had not agreed to have resolved by

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

49

Mohr, Manfred. "Advisory Opinion of the International Court of Justice on the legality of the use of nuclear weapons under international law — A few thoughts on its strengths and weaknesses." International Review of the Red Cross 37, no. 316 (1997): 92–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0020860400084333.

Full text

Abstract:

On 8 July 1996, the International Court of Justice finally rendered its Advisory Opinion on the legality of the threat or use of nuclear weapons. The procedure had been dragging on since the start of the public sittings on 30 October 1995. Several deadlines set by the Court for reaching a decision came and went, ultimately giving rise to the fear that there would be no decisive majority to affirm the basic unlawfulness of the use of nuclear weapons. This would have been a bitter setback for the initiators of the Advisory Opinion proceeding and for the development of international law.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

50

Bracken, Lydia. "The ECtHR’s first advisory opinion: Implications for cross-border surrogacy involving male intended parents." Medical Law International 21, no. 1 (2021): 3–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/09685332211002592.

Full text

Abstract:

This article examines the content and scope of the European Court of Human Rights’s first advisory opinion as regards the practice of cross-border surrogacy in Europe. While the advisory opinion concerns the recognition of the legal parentage of an intended mother, this article considers whether the reasoning could be applied to male couples who avail of surrogacy. It is argued that the non-genetically related intended father in the male couple is in a directly comparable position to the non-genetically related intended mother in the opposite-sex couple for the purpose of legal parentage follo

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!