Academic literature on the topic 'Paraphasic error'

Abstract Background Our study aimed to present the distinctive correlates of formal thought disorder in patients with schizophrenia, using the Clinical Language Disorder Rating Scale (CLANG) Methods We compared the formal thought disorder and other clinical characteristics between schizophrenia patients with (n = 82) and without (n = 80) formal thought disorder. Psychometric scales including the CLANG, Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale (BPRS), Young Mania Rating Scale (YMRS), Calgery Depression Scale for Schizophrenia (CDSS) and Word Fluency Test (WFT) were used Results After adjusting the effects of age, sex and total scores on the BPRS, YMRS and WFT, the subjects with disorganized speech presented significantly higher score on the poverty of contents of abnormal syntax (F = 7.08, P = 0.01), lack of semantic association (F = 8.02, P =0.01), disclosure failure (F = 60.97, P < 0.001), pragmatics disorder (F = 11.94, P = 0.01), dysarthria (F = 13.61, P < 0.001), and paraphasic error (F = 8.25, P = 0.01) items than those without formal thought disorder. With defining the mentioned item scores as covariates, binary logistic regression model predicted that disclosure failure (adjusted odds ratio [aOR] = 5.88, P < 0.001) and pragmatics disorder (aOR = 2.17, P = 0.04) were distinctive correlates of formal thought disorder in patients with schizophrenia. Discussion Disclosure failure and pragmatics disorder might be used as the distinctive indexes for formal thought disorder in patients with schizophrenia.

Abstract BACKGROUND Awake craniotomy with direct electrical stimulation (DES) is the standard treatment for patients with eloquent area gliomas. Language errors (paraphasias) are detected with DES and they indicate functional boundaries that need to be maintained to preserve quality of life. However, it is not fully clear in which brain locations paraphasias at different linguistic modalities and levels (production, comprehension, reading, writing, phonology, semantics, syntax) occur. MATERIALS AND METHODS A systematic review was conducted. We included 102 studies reporting on specific paraphasias and the corresponding brain locations during awake craniotomy with DES in adult glioma patients. RESULTS First, a wide distribution of brain locations for all paraphasias (n=930) was found, but patterns were observed. Cortically, paraphasias occurred most often in the precentral gyrus (22%), while subcortically, they occurred mainly at the inferior fronto-occipital fascicle (IFOF: 10%). Localization patterns for different paraphasia types and the corresponding language functions were also found: production/articulation (n=393)-precentral gyrus (41%), inferior frontal gyrus (9%), frontal aslant/striatal tract (4%), postcentral gyrus (3%); semantics (n=128)-IFOF (57%), superior temporal gyrus (9%); phonology (n=115)-arcuate fascicle (52%), superior longitudinal fascicle (10%), uncinate fascicle (3%); reading (n=25)-temporal lobe (48%), inferior longitudinal fascicle (32%); syntax (n=15)-inferior frontal gyrus (27%); speech initiation (n=9)-supplementary motor area (33%), frontal aslant tract (22%), frontal striatal tract (22%); writing (n=7)-superior parietal gyrus (71%). Second, 59% of all paraphasias occurred cortically, 40% subcortically and 1% at both levels. CONCLUSION The localization of most paraphasias are consistent with the assumed functionality of those brain locations as presented in the Dutch Linguistic Intraoperative Protocol model. However, new locations for production/articulation, phonology, reading and writing were found. This needs to be taken into consideration for future selection of pre, intra and postoperative language tasks at different language modalities and levels. Additionally, DES should always be applied at the subcortical level as a standard addition to the routine cortical mapping during awake craniotomy. In conclusion, this is the first systematic review on the localization of specific paraphasias during awake craniotomy. Based on the identified language localization patterns, language tasks could be selected more accurately. This could guide, and perhaps improve, pre, intra and postoperative language testing and monitoring, which in turn, may pave the way to a better postoperative language outcome. The possible relation between different intraoperative paraphasias and language outcome has yet to be determined.

Purpose This study was conducted to evaluate the clinical utility of error variability for differentiating between apraxia of speech (AOS) and aphasia with phonemic paraphasia. Method Participants were 32 individuals with aphasia after left cerebral injury. Diagnostic groups were formed on the basis of operationalized measures of recognized articulatory and prosodic characteristics of AOS and phonemic paraphasia. Sequential repetitions of multisyllabic words were elicited as part of a motor speech evaluation and transcribed phonetically. Four metrics of variability at the syllable and word levels were derived from these transcripts. Results The measures yielded different magnitudes of variability. There were no group differences between participants who displayed speech profiles consistent with AOS and participants who displayed speech profiles indicative of aphasia with phonemic paraphasia. Rather, correlation coefficients and analyses of covariance showed that the variability metrics were significantly mediated by overall error rate. Additionally, variability scores for individuals with salient diagnoses of AOS and conduction aphasia were inconsistent with current diagnostic guidelines. Conclusions The results do not support diagnostic validity of error variability for differentiating between AOS and aphasia with phonemic paraphasia. Future research using error variability metrics should account for overall error rate in the analysis and matching of participant groups.