Artículos de revistas sobre el tema "Court mediator"
Siga este enlace para ver otros tipos de publicaciones sobre el tema: Court mediator.
Crea una cita precisa en los estilos APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard y otros
Consulte los 50 mejores artículos de revistas para su investigación sobre el tema "Court mediator".
Junto a cada fuente en la lista de referencias hay un botón "Agregar a la bibliografía". Pulsa este botón, y generaremos automáticamente la referencia bibliográfica para la obra elegida en el estilo de cita que necesites: APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.
También puede descargar el texto completo de la publicación académica en formato pdf y leer en línea su resumen siempre que esté disponible en los metadatos.
Explore artículos de revistas sobre una amplia variedad de disciplinas y organice su bibliografía correctamente.
1
Brooker, Penny. "Mediator immunity: time for evaluation in England and Wales?" Legal Studies 36, n.º 3 (septiembre de 2016): 464–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/lest.12120.
Resumen
In England and Wales, the issue of mediator immunity has not been considered by the courts or via legislation. Mediator immunity is constructed by analogy to that given to judges, but the role of the judiciary is different to that of mediators, who do not determine cases and, it is argued, do not require protection from litigation because the parties are responsible for the final settlement outcome. In Australia and the USA, mediators are usually provided with immunity in mandatory, ‘court-annexed’ programmes, although this varies from an absolute to a qualified level that is constrained by bad faith or dishonesty. In the English jurisdiction, mediation is court-connected and parties are dissuaded from accessing the courts through the risk of costs penalties or automatic referral schemes. Therefore, the time is opportune for a review of many issues involved in mediation development, including immunity. This paper considers the reasoning for extending immunity to mediators, before concluding that the subject should not be determined through legal action until after a comprehensive review of mediation developments and after a consideration of mediator standards and regulation of practice.
2
Nasution, Rusli Halil, Asmuni Asmuni y Pagar Hsb. "The Process of Implementing Divorce Cases in North Sumatra Religious Court after the Entry into force of PERMA Number 1 of 2016". Budapest International Research and Critics Institute (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences 3, n.º 3 (30 de julio de 2020): 2027–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.33258/birci.v3i3.1129.
Resumen
The aims of the study are to find out the process of implementing divorce case in North Sumatera. This study is a qualitative and normative study of PERMA Number 1 of 2016 with its application in the North Sumatra Religious Court as a legal product in the present aspects that applies in testing the success of the regulation being implemented in the North Sumatra Court, especially in (three) 3 big cities namely the Court Medan, Binjai and Tebing Tinggi religion. The result shows that The implementation of peace in divorce cases in the North Sumatra Religious Court is not significant. In the implementation of divorce case mediation in the North Sumatra Religious Court, many factors influence, among others, technical and non-technical factors. The technical factor is the limitations of the Mediator, namely the absence of a list of non-Judge Mediators here will further aggravate the work of the Judge because of his work being double that is as a Panel Judge and Mediator Judge. So that the work of the Judge mediator is very ineffective and so is the non-judge mediator who must have an official certificate from the Supreme Court so that the training costs are large and the costs of the mediator are not protected by the Regulation
3
Ilhami, Haniah. "REVITALIZATION OF BADAN PENASIHATAN, PEMBINAAN DAN PELESTARIAN PERKAWINAN (BP4) IN PERFORMING COURT-ANNEXED MEDIATION FOR MARITAL DISPUTES IN RELIGIOUS COURT IN D.I.YOGYAKART". Mimbar Hukum - Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gadjah Mada 29, n.º 1 (31 de mayo de 2017): 96. http://dx.doi.org/10.22146/jmh.18827.
Resumen
This research identify the revitalization of Badan Penasihatan, Pembinaan dan Pelestarian Perkawinan (BP4) after The 14th BP4 National Conference in 2009, in performing Court-annexed mediation for Marital Dispute at Religious Court in D.I. Yogyakarta. This research founds several institutional transformation of BP4 including the Legal Basis, Institutional Form, Institutional Relation with Ministry of Religious Affair, Employement/Management Provisions, and Financial Provisions. In Performing Court-annexed mediation. BP4 in D.I. Yogyakarta has been cooperating with 2 (two) Religious Courts, both in Wonosari and Yogyakarta through Memorandum of Understanding in form of cooperation in the placement of certified mediator from BP4 and cooperation in funding the certified mediators. All Mediators are bound by Regulation of The Supreme Court No. 1 year 2016 concerning Procedures of Court-annexed Mediation, related to Types of Cases Mediated, Mediator’s Fee, Venue of Mediation, Period of Mediation, and Mediator’s requirement.
4
Hanifah, Mardalena. "PERBANDINGAN TUGAS MEDIATOR PADA PENGADILAN AGAMA INDONESIA DENGAN MAHKAMAH SYARIAH MALAYSIA". ADHAPER: Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata 6, n.º 2 (8 de marzo de 2021): 101. http://dx.doi.org/10.36913/jhaper.v6i2.134.
Resumen
Article 3 (2) Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures, Case Examining Judges in the consideration of a decision must state that the case has been pursued peace through mediation by mentioning the mediator. The court is not only tasked with examining, trying, and resolving cases it receives but also seeks to reconcile the parties. The court, which has been impressed as a law enforcement and justice institution, now appears as an institution that seeks peaceful solutions for the parties. The implementation of Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures in Courts can be an eff ort to resolve civil disputes so that the settlement of civil disputes through mediation is the main choice. The research method used is normative legal research which includes research on legal principles which is very basic in guided law. The nature of the research carried out is descriptive, namely research that describes and explains in clear and detailed sentences. The data used are secondary data obtained from literature, consisting of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials. Processing and data analysis used qualitative methods. The defi nition of mediation according to the Religious Courts in Indonesia and the Syari’ah Courts in Malaysia is the eff ort of the judges and courts to reconcile the parties so that the divorce process does not continue at the next trial. When the mediation process was carried out at the Indonesian Religious Court and the Syari’ah Court in Malaysia, there was a similarity, namely the mediation process was carried out at the fi rst trial and it was an obligation for the disputing parties in a divorce case to take mediation. according to the procedure for the appointment of mediators at the Indonesian Religious Courts and the Syari’ah Courts in Malaysia and the appointments of these mediators are both made by the judges.
5
Galin, Amira. "What makes court-referred mediation effective?" International Journal of Conflict Management 25, n.º 1 (4 de febrero de 2014): 21–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ijcma-09-2012-0071.
Resumen
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to obtain insight into court-referred mediation in the Israeli Labor Courts, by analyzing its processes and outcomes, as a function of tactics used by both the disputants and the mediator. Design/methodology/approach – Observation of 103 court-referred mediations, for each of which a detailed process and outcome were documented. Data on disputants' refusal to participate in the mediation was also collected. At the end of each mediation case, disputants were given a questionnaire in which they expressed their satisfaction with the outcome and their evaluation of the mediator's contribution. Findings – A low rate of refusal to participate in court-referred mediation was found. Also, the higher the ratio of soft tactics to pressure tactics employed (by all parties involved) during the process, the higher the rate of agreements. Mediators use significantly more soft tactics than disputants, and are more active in using tactics. The two significant variables that predict the mediation's agreement are the ratio between soft tactics to pressure tactics used by all parties, and mediator contribution to the process. Practical implications – The significant role of soft tactics in the process, outcome, and satisfaction of court-referred mediation may serve as a guideline for disputants and mediators. Originality/value – This unique research, which examines the impact of tactics on court-referred mediation, may provide added and significant theoretical insight into its process and outcome, as well as a better understanding of other “hybrid” (compulsory at the beginning, voluntary at the end) mediations.
6
Et. al., Dr Muhammad Juni Beddu,. "Urgency of Mediator (Mediation) in Resolving Divorce Cases in Religious Courts". Turkish Journal of Computer and Mathematics Education (TURCOMAT) 12, n.º 4 (10 de abril de 2021): 1455–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.17762/turcomat.v12i4.1383.
Resumen
This scientific paper was written to investigate the Urgency of Mediators in Resolving Divorce Cases in the Religious Courts. The descriptive method was employed to describe a scientific paper with a theoretical description. It can also be called a grand theory. A mediator is a person who should be able to divert the intention of the two parties from the one who wants to divorce to undo that intention. Therefore, the two parties in the case are settled peacefully. The mediator is the judge himself or an individual or institution that has been certified by the Supreme Court.
7
Riyanto, Mahmud Hadi. "EKSISTENSI MEDIASI TERHADAP PERKARA PERCERAIAN DI WILAYAH PTA MAKASSAR". Jurisprudentie : Jurusan Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum 5, n.º 1 (8 de junio de 2018): 124. http://dx.doi.org/10.24252/jurisprudentie.v5i2.5435.
Resumen
Abstract Divorce cases in religious courts, must first be made to mediation, mediation is done to solve the problem to reconcile married couples. Based on the facts on the ground, although it has been done to the fullest by a mediator judge, the success rate of mediation is still low. The research’s aim was to analyze the cause of the low level of success in mediation. The research’s also aims the low level of mediation success is due to factors of mediators and factors of justice seekers. Mediator factors are assessed for lack of mediator skills, mediators only carry out mediation according to formal legal principles mediators lack the mastery of role science, communication science and family psychology. Justice seeker factors are assessed for lack of seriousness in mediation forums by mediator and each of whom has been adhering to the principle of divorce so difficult to pursue peace.Key Word : mediation, court, mediator, role, communication, psychology AbstrakPerkara perceraian di pengadilan agama terlebih dahulu wajib untuk dilakukan Mediasi, mediasi dilakukan untuk menyelesaikan masalah guna merukunkan pasangan suami istri. Berdasarkan fakta di lapangan, meskipun telah dilakukan secara maksimal oleh hakim mediator, ternyata tingkat keberhasilan mediasi masih rendah. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis penyebab rendahnya tingkat keberhasilan dalam mediasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa rendahnya tingkat keberhasilan mediasi disebabkan karena faktor mediator dan faktor para pencari keadilan. Faktor mediator dinilai karena kurangnya kemampuan kemampuan (skill) mediator, mediator hanya melaksanakan mediasi sesuai asas legal formal, mediator kurang menguasai ilmu peran, ilmu komunikasi dan ilmu psikologi keluarga. Faktor pencari keadilan dinilai karena kurang seriusnya dalam mengikuti forum mediasi yang dipimpin oleh mediator dan masing masing sudah berpegang teguh pada prinsip perceraian sehingga sulit untuk diupayakan damaiKata Kunci : mediasi, pengadilan, mediator, peran, komunikasi, psikologi
8
Hasanah, Faridatul. "MEDIATOR'S PERSUASIVE APPROACH IN MEDIATION PRACTICE: CASE STUDY OF DIVORCE AT GRESIK RELIGIOUS COURT". SHAKHSIYAH BURHANIYAH: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Islam 6, n.º 1 (4 de enero de 2021): 25–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.33752/sbjphi.v6i1.1639.
Resumen
This research was field qualitative. Purpose is (1) To determine the strategy of judges mediators in settling divorce cases through mediation in the religious Gresik (2) To know the views of people about the existence of mediation as a way to prevent divorce (3) To find out how the effectiveness of the mediation process in handling divorce cases in the religious Gresik. The variables of this research is the role of the judge Mediator Mediation Divorce Case. The study population was numbered 7 people, samples of this study is 4 mediators as informants for only two the informant can be reached. For people who are litigants, 4 as the samples which are in neighborhood religious Courts Gresik. Data collection techniques used were interview and documentation. The results of this study indicate that. (1) strategy judge mediator in case of divorce mediation is to maximize the mediation process by providing advice and consideration if later married couples end up with divorce where previously done caucus or to each party alternately on mediation it self. (2) The view of the public about the existence of the mediation is a good thing because it provides education in the form of advice and teach harmony and the community is also considered that mediation in the religious should stay there. (3) the effectiveness of mediation in the religious Gresik which is not very effective because the number that failed in mediation more than a successful mediation.
Keywords: Role of Judges, Mediation, Divorce
Abstrak
Penelitian ini adalah kualitatif lapangan. Arahnya ialah (1) Untuk dapat memahami cara mediator dalam menangani kasus perceraian melalui proses juru damai (2) Untuk mendapatkan hasil mengenai pandangan masyarakat tentang adanya mediasi yang berperan sebagai juru damai mengenai perceraian (3) Untuk dapat memahami seberapa penting efektifitas proses mediasi dalam menyelesaikan permasalahan yang terjadi. penelitian ini ialah inovasi mediator dalam menentukan keberhasilan mediasi kasus perceraian. Populasi penelitian ini adalah berjumlah 7 orang, yang diteliti ada 4 orang sebagai informan mediator. Untuk masyarakat yang melakukan mediasi diambil dua pasang. Tehnik yang digunakan yakni tehnik wawancara dan dokumentasi. Hasil penelitian ini menjelaskan bahwa. (1) cara yang dipakai juru damai untuk menangani masalah cerai adalah mempermudah proses mediasi ,mediator berulangkali menyelipkan nasehat -nasehat yang berujung perdamaian, meskipun nantinya tidak dapat rukun kembali, alangkah baiknya berpisah dengan cara baik-baik.(2) Pandangan masyarakat mengenai adanya mediasi ini antusiasnya begitu baik, karena juru damai seperti ini yang dibutuhkan saat ini, lebih bersifat kekeluargaan. (3) efektifitas mediasi belum sempurna disebabkan meningkatnya orang yang ingin cerai dan juru damai yang mempunyai sertifikat sangat kurang.
Kata Kunci: Inovasi Mediator, Mediasi, Perceraian
9
Syafaah, Darisy y Lismawati Lismawati. "Komunikasi Interpersonal Mediator Dalam Proses Mediasi Perkara Perceraian di Pengadilan Agama Tulungagung". Al-I'lam: Jurnal Komunikasi dan Penyiaran Islam 2, n.º 2 (30 de marzo de 2019): 46. http://dx.doi.org/10.31764/jail.v2i1.1259.
Resumen
Abstrak:Penelitian ini membahahas dua persoalan pokok yaitu: 1) Bagaimana komunikasi interpersonal mediator dengan pihak yang berperkara dalam proses perceraian di Pengadilan Agama Tulungagung?, 2) Faktor apa sajakah yang mendukung dan menghambat komunikasi interpersonal mediator Pengadilan Agama Tulungagung dalam proses mediasi perkara perceraian?. Metode yang digunakan peneliti untuk menjawab permasalahan tersebut adalah metode kualitatif deskriptif melalui studi kasus perceraian yang terjadi di Pengadilan Agama Negeri Tulungagung. Adapun untuk memperoleh hasil data secara rinci, penelitian ini menggunakan metode wawancara, observasi dan dokumentasi. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa 1) Mediator mengaplikasikan 5 prinsip hukum komunikasiefektif dalam melaksanakan mediasi dengan pihak yang berperkara pada kasus perceraian di pengadilan Agama Tulungagung yaitu: empati, menghormati, dapat didengarkan atau dimengerti, kejelasan pesan, dan sikap rendah hati yang ditunjukkan melalui sikap dan tutur mediator, 2) Keberhasilan mediator dalam komunikasi interpersonal untuk menekan angka perceraian di Pengadilan Agama Tulungagung disebabkan oleh sikap tegas dan netral mediator dalam mengarahkan pihak yang berperkara serta sikap pihak berperkara yang terbuka. Namun di sisi lain, komunikasi interpersonal terkadang menunjukkan keberhasilan yang rendah karena permasalahan tawar menawar yang rumit terkait harta gono gini, sikap kukuh para pihak yang berperkara untuk bercerai, serta keengganan mengikuti proses mediasi sebagai jalan untuk mempercepat proses perceraian Abstract:This study addresses two main issues, namely: 1) How is mediator interpersonal communication with litigants in the divorce process in the Tulungagung Religious Court?. To answer this problem, researchers used descriptive qualitative methods oriented to divorce case studies that took place in the Tulungagung District Religious Court. In order to obtain detailed data results, researchers used three methods of data collection, namely interviews, observation and documentation as non-human data sources. The results showed that 1) Mediators applied 5 principles of interpersonal communication in conducting mediation with litigants in divorce cases at the Tulungagung Religion court, namely: empathy, respect, can be heard or understood, clarity of messages, and a humble attitude that was shown through attitude and speech mediator, 2) The success of the mediator in interpersonal communication to reduce divorce rates in the Tulungagung Religious Court is caused by the firm and neutral attitude of the mediator in directing the litigant party and the open attitude of the litigant party.However, on the other hand, interpersonal communication sometimes shows low success because of the problem of complicated bargaining related to property, the firm attitude of the parties to divorce, and reluctance to follow the mediation process as a way to speed up the divorce process.
10
Wiantara, I. Komang. "Penyelesaian Perkara Perdata di Pengadilan Berdasarkan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2016". Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) 7, n.º 4 (31 de diciembre de 2018): 456. http://dx.doi.org/10.24843/jmhu.2018.v07.i04.p04.
Resumen
The existence of mediation in the settlement of civil disputes in the courts is regulated in the Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures in the Court which contains ten principles including: mediation must be taken, party autonomy, mediation in good faith, time efficiency, mediator certification, mediator responsibility , confidentiality, financing, repetition of mediation, peace agreements outside the court, become integral parts in resolving disputes in court. In addition, mediation in the court strengthened peaceful efforts as stated in the Civil Procedure Code. The purpose of this study is to understand and analyze the legal strength of mediation in the Court. This study uses a normative juridical research method using the statutory approach. Study show that due to its consensual and collaborative nature, mediation always results in a dispute resolution in a win-win solution that is strengthened to become a Peace Deed, which has Executorial power like a Court Decision.
Eksistensi mediasi dalam penyelesaian sengketa perdata di pengadilan diatur dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 Tentang Prosedur Mediasi Di Pengadilan yang memuat sepuluh prinsip meliputi: mediasi wajib ditempuh, otonomi para pihak, mediasi dengan itikad baik, efisiensi waktu, sertifikasi mediator, tanggung jawab mediator, kerahasiaan, pembiayaan, pengulangan mediasi, kesepakatan perdamaian di luar pengadilan, menjadi bagian dalam integral dalam penyelesaian sengketa di pengadilan. Selain itu mediasi pada pengadilan memperkuat upaya damai sebagaimana yang tertuang di dalam hukum acara Perdata. Tujuan penelitian ini untuk memahami dan menganalisis kekuatan hukum mediasi menurut Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 Tentang Prosedur Mediasi Di Pengadilan. Kajian ini menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa karena sifatnya yang konsensual dan kolaboratif, maka mediasi selalu menghasilkan penyelesaian sengketa dengan cara sama-sama menguntungkan bagi para pihak (win-win solution) yang dikuatkan menjadi Akta Perdamaian, yang memiliki kekuatan Eksekutorial layaknya Putusan Pengadilan.
11
Hariyanto, Erie, Moh Efendi y Sulistiyawati Sulistiyawati. "Dilema Hakim Pengadilan Agama dalam Menyelesaikan Perkara Hukum Keluarga Melalui Mediasi". Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi 4, n.º 1 (30 de junio de 2021): 115–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.24090/volksgeist.v4i1.4333.
Resumen
This article aims to determine the role of judges in resolving family law cases through mediation in the Religious Courts, where judges have the position as state officials as regulated in Law Number 43 of 1999 concerning Basic Personnel, can also be a mediator in the judiciary. as regulated in Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures where judges have the responsibility to seek peace at every level of the trial and are also involved in mediation procedures. The research method used in this article uses normative legal research methods. Whereas until now judges still have a very important role in resolving family law cases in the Religious Courts due to the fact that there are still many negotiating processes with mediation assisted by judges, even though on the one hand the number of non-judge mediators is available, although in each region it is not evenly distributed in terms of number and capacity. non-judge mediator.
12
Ahmad, Zulkarnain, Nila Sastrawati y Ashar Sinilele. "Peranan Mediator dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Ekonomi Syariah di Pengadilan Agama Makassar Kelas 1A". Iqtishaduna: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Hukum Ekonomi Syari'ah 2, n.º 3 (30 de diciembre de 2020): 62. http://dx.doi.org/10.24252/iqtishaduna.v2i3.18829.
Resumen
AbstrakPenelitan ini dilakukan dengan tujuan untuk mengetahui peranan mediator dalam menyelesaikan sengketa ekonomi syariah melalui mediasi di Pengadilan Agama Makassar Kelas 1A, Jenis penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah kualitatif yang berbentuk penelitian lapangan (field research), dengan menggunakan pendekatan secara empiris. Sumber data penelitian ini adalah data dan wawancara kepada hakim ekonomi syariah yang memiliki serfikat mediator di Pengadilan Agama Makassar kelas 1A. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa peranan dan proses mediator dalam penyelesaian sengketa ekonomi syariah sudah sesuai dengan ketentuan Perma Nomor 1 Tahun 2016. Proses dan peranan tersebut, yaitu melalui mediasi di Pengadilan Agama Makassar Kelas 1A, Dalam proses mediasi dilakukan dengan cara membuat resume kemudian kedua pihak menyampaikan dua isi pokok resume yaitu perkara yang sedang diperkarakan dan solusi tawaran untuk penyelesaian secara damai. Prosedur dan tahapan mediasi dalam perkara perdata pada umumnya, diatur dalam pasal 3 sampai pasal 14 peraturan mahkamah Agung RI No. 2 Tahun 2003 jo PERMA Nomor 1 Tahun 2008 tentang Prosedur mediasi di pengadilan, dan PERMA Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 Tentang Prosedur Mediasi di Pengadilan. Mediasi di Pengadilan dibagi dalam dua tahap yaitu tahap pra mediasi dan tahapan pelaksanaan mediasi. Tahapan pramediasi adalah tahap dimana para pihak menunjuk mediator sebagai pihak ketiga yang akan membantu menyelesaikan sengketa mereka. Sehingga peranan mediator dala memediasi sengketa ekonomi syariah yaitu dengan dua cara, Hanya sebagai fasilitator yang mengatur kelancaran proses mediasi (facilitative approach).Kata Kunci: Mediator, Pengadilan Agama, Sengketa Ekonomi. AbstractThe type of research used in this study was qualitative. in the form of field research (field research), using an empirical approach. The data sources of this research are data and interviews with sharia economic judges who have a mediator certificate at the Class 1A Makassar Religious Court. The results show that the role and process of the mediator in settling sharia economic disputes are in accordance with the provisions of Perma No.1 of 2016. The process and role, namely through mediation at the Class 1A Makassar Religious Court, in the mediation process is carried out by making a resume then both parties submit the two main contents of the resume, namely the case being litigated and the solution offered for a peaceful settlement. The procedures and stages of mediation in civil cases in general are regulated in article 3 to article 14 of the Supreme Court Regulation No. 2 of 2003 in conjunction with PERMA Number 1 of 2008 concerning mediation procedures in court, and PERMA Number 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures in Courts. Mediation in court is divided into two stages, namely the pre-mediation stage and the mediation stage. The pre-mediation stage is the stage where the parties appoint a mediator as a third party who will help resolve their dispute. So that the role of the mediator in mediating Islamic economic disputes is in two ways, only as a facilitator who regulates the smoothness of the mediation process (facilitative approach).Keywords: Economic Dispute, Mediator, Religious Court.
13
Hikmah, Nur, Darwinsyah Minin y Isnaini Isnaini. "Mediasi Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Sengketa Perdata di Pengadilan (Analisis Putusan Nomor. 52/PDT.G/2015/PN.RAP)". ARBITER: Jurnal Ilmiah Magister Hukum 1, n.º 2 (2 de octubre de 2019): 194–201. http://dx.doi.org/10.31289/arbiter.v1i2.122.
Resumen
Peace is the most gentle answer as well as a win-win solutin, the existence of the basic law of mediation in Indonesia as an alternative to the dispute resolution outside the court can be seen in Article 130 HIR and Article 154 RBG which has set up a peace institution which then judges shall first reconcile the parties before the case is reviewed, as described in Article 130 HIR / 154 RBG and PERMA Number. 01 of 2008 on Mediation Procedures in Courts. The formulation of the problem is how the rules of mediation law as an alternative to the settlement of civil disputes in the Court, how the implementation and mechanism in the selection of Mediators at the District Court Rantauprapat and how the results of mediation on civil cases Number.52 / Pdt.G / 2015 / PN.Rap generated from the mediation process, the aim is to know and simultaneously find the law of mediation as an alternative to civil disputes settlement in the Court and to know the implementation and mechanism of the selection of Mediator in Rantauprapat District Court and meganalisis the decision of civil case Number.52 / Pdt.G / 2015 / PN.Rap resulting from the mediation process
14
Dąbrowski, Marek. "A Settlement Reached before a Mediator and a Court Settlement—a Gloss to the Judgment of the Court of Appeal in Katowice of 23 September 2016, File Ref. no. I Aca 404/16". Roczniki Nauk Prawnych 28, n.º 4 ENGLISH ONLINE VERSION (29 de octubre de 2019): 181–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.18290/rnp.2018.28.4-11en.
Resumen
The gloss discusses the considerations of the proposition formulated in the justification for the judgement of the Court of Appeal, in which it was assumed that the difference between a settlement agreement concluded before the court and an agreement concluded before a mediator and approved by the court is that only the agreement concluded before the court has the legal force equal to that of a notarial deed. The presented doubts relate to the part of the reasoning concerning a settlement reached before a mediator and which has been “approved by the court.”
15
Sukaenah, Sukaenah, Rusli Rusli y M. Taufan B. "The Effectiveness of Indonesia Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 Year 2016 Concerning Mediation of Marriage Disputes". INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY ISLAMIC LAW AND SOCIETY 2, n.º 1 (1 de agosto de 2020): 63–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.24239/ijcils.vol2.iss1.15.
Resumen
This paper discusses the effectiveness of Indonesia Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 year 2016 concerning mediation marital disputes in the Religious Court. This study used qualitative research method. Data was gathered through observation, in-depth interviews, and documenta studies. Data were analyzed through data reduction, presentation, verification, and conclusion drawing. The results of the study shows that effectiveness of PERMA No. 1 of 2016 has been successfully implemented, but the regulation is not effective to reduce divorce rates. This is because the cases that have been reconciled are still few compared to failed mediation. The efforts carried out by the mediator to make mediation effective are merely to act as facilitators by explaining the purpose of mediation to litigants, providing facilities to carry out mediation and increasing the ability of mediators. Supporting factors: Implementation of Mediation based on PERMA Number 1 Year 2016 which is effective, Qualification of Mediators, Facilities, Community Compliance and cultural factors. Inhibiting factors includes technical factors such as mediator limitations, longer mediation time, non-technical factors includes lack of understanding for the parties about the importance of mediation.
16
Mustopa, Abdul. "Plant-Based Mediation Contribution to the Settlement of Cases at the Court". International Journal of Nusantara Islam 8, n.º 2 (15 de diciembre de 2020): 300–312. http://dx.doi.org/10.15575/ijni.v8i2.12416.
Resumen
Mediation is one of the stages in the trial process. Mediation must be carried out by the parties, who are disputing civil cases in all areas of the judiciary. Mediation is a law, as the State of Indonesia is a state based on law. Article 1 of the 1945 Constitution is a constitution that regulates the form of the state of Indonesia as a constitutional state. The contribution of offline and online-based mediation to the settlement of cases in the regional courts of the Mataram Religious High Court when combined, the two seem to be insignificant in resolving cases, both offline and online mediation. The low level of success is due to the mediator factor and the factor of justice seekers. The mediator factor is assessed due to the lack of ability (skills) of the mediator, the mediator only carries out mediation according to formal legal principles, the mediator does not master role knowledge, communication science, family psychology which results in rigidity in carrying out mediation, if the mediator has multiple disciplines, of course it will spawn. better results of the implementation of mediation. The justice seeker factor is judged due to the lack of seriousness in participating in a mediation forum led by a mediator and each of them has adhered to its principles.
17
KHOIRUL ANAM. "STRATEGI HAKIM MEDIATOR DALAM MENCEGAH TERJADINYA PERCERAIAN". Jurnal YUSTITIABELEN 7, n.º 1 (19 de julio de 2021): 115–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.36563/yustitiabelen.v7i1.323.
Resumen
ABSTRAK
Strategi Hakim Mediator Dalam Mencegah Terjadinya Perceraian, Studi di Pengadilan Agama Tulungagung adalah Judul dari penelitian ini, hal ini menarik di angkat sebagai judul, disebabkan tingginya perceraian setiap tahunya pada wilayah Kabupaten Tulungagung, dapat kita lihat pada tahun 2008 - 2012 dan terakhir bulan Juni 2013 jumlah pemohon meningkat. Hal ini memunculkan dua pertanyaan. Pertanyaan, pertama adalah Faktor apa penyebab timbulnya perceraian di Pengadilan Agama Tulungagung? dan yang Kedua adalah, bagaimana Strategi Hakim Mediator dalam mencegah terjadinya perceraian di Pengadilan Agama Tulungagung?. Tujuan dari Penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis faktor penyebab perceraian pada Pengadilan Agama Tulungagung serta untuk menganalisa Strategi Hakim Mediator melakukan pendekatan kepada para pihak agar tidak terjadi perceraian.
Untuk mendapatkan pemahaman yang utuh tentang Strategi Hakim Mediator Dalam Mencegah Terjadinya Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama Tulungagung ini, di perlukan metode yang mampu untuk menjawab rumusan masalah atau pertanyaan diatas, maka peneliti menggunakan metode kualitatif. Dengan Pendekatan penelitian tersebut bertujuan memperoleh data lebih lengkap, sesuai konsep Pendekatan penelitian kualitatif. Sedangakan untuk teknik pengumpulan datanya dengan menggunkan teknik observasi, wawancara mendalam, serta dokumentasi.
Dari hasil penelitian tentang Strategi Hakim Mediator Dalam Mencegah Terjadinya Perceraian, Studi Di Pengadilan Agama Tulungagung ini adalah, ada beberapa faktor yang menyebabkan orang mengajukan permohonan cerai di antaranya, faktor tidak adanya tanggung jawab suami terhadap keluarga, adanya Kekerasan dalam keluarga, tidak adanya keharmonisan di dalam keluarga, adanya faktor ekonomi atau kurangnya nafkah kepada istri, Serta adanya gangguan dari luar (Perempuan atau laki laki lain). Sedangkan untuk strategi Hakim Mediator dalam melaksanakan mediasi untuk mencegah terjadinya perceraian dengan menggunakan beberapa strategi atau pendekatan, di antaranya adalah pendekatan agama, pendekatan masa lalu atau mengingat masa-masa romantis, Pendekatan Matematis, dan Pendekatan Keluarga (anak atau orang tua) serta Pendekatan Psikologis kepada para pihak.
Dari kesimpulan dan temuan diatas, ada beberapa saran khususnya kepada Pengadilan Agama Tulungagung dan Mahkamah Agung yaitu, a) Pengadilan Agama Tulungagung perlu mendorong kepada Hakim Mediator untuk mengikuti pendidikan dan pelatihan khusus Mediasi. b) Mahkamah Agung perlu membuat buku saku khusus tentang petunjuk praktis pendekatan Mediasi untuk pegangan Hakim mediator atau mediator.
Kata Kunci: Hakim, Perceraian, Mencegah, Mediator.
MEDIATOR JUDGE'S STRATEGY IN PREVENTING DIVORCE
ABSTRACTThe Mediator Judge's Strategy in Preventing Divorce, Studies at the Tulungagung Religious Court is the title of this study, it is interesting to be appointed as a title, due to the high divorce rate every year in the Tulungagung Regency area, we can see in 2008 - 2012 and last June 2013 the number of applicants increases. This raises two questions. The first question is what are the factors that cause divorce in the Tulungagung Religious Court? and the second is, what is the strategy of the Mediator Judge in preventing divorce in the Tulungagung Religious Court?. The purpose of this study is to analyze the factors that cause divorce at the Tulungagung Religious Court and to analyze the Mediator Judge's Strategy to approach the parties so that divorce does not occur.To get a complete understanding of the Mediator Judge's Strategy in Preventing Divorce in the Tulungagung Religious Court, a method is needed that is able to answer the problem formulation or question above, the researchers used qualitative methods. With this research approach, it aims to obtain more complete data, according to the concept of a qualitative research approach. As for the data collection techniques using observation techniques, in-depth interviews, and documentation.From the results of research on the Mediator Judge's Strategy in Preventing Divorce, the Study at the Tulungagung Religious Court is, there are several factors that cause people to apply for divorce including, the factor of the husband's lack of responsibility towards the family, the existence of violence in the family, the absence of harmony in the family. in the family, the existence of economic factors or lack of living for the wife, as well as interference from outside (women or other men). As for the Mediator Judge's strategy in carrying out mediation to prevent divorce by using several strategies or approaches, including the religious approach, the past approach or remembering romantic times, the Mathematical Approach, and the Family Approach (child or parent) as well as the Psychological Approach. to the parties.From the conclusions and findings above, there are several suggestions, especially to the Tulungagung Religious Court and the Supreme Court, namely, a) The Tulungagung Religious Court needs to encourage Mediator Judges to take special education and training in Mediation. b) The Supreme Court needs to make a special pocket book on practical guidelines for the Mediation approach for the guidance of the mediator Judge or mediator. Keywords: Judge, Divorce, Prevent, Mediator.
18
Hariyani, Sri. "EFEKTIVITAS MEDIASI DALAM PENYELESAIAN PERKARA PERCERAIAN DI PENGADILAN AGAMA PASURUAN". Negara dan Keadilan 9, n.º 1 (5 de noviembre de 2020): 62. http://dx.doi.org/10.33474/hukum.v9i1.7492.
Resumen
Pengadilan Agama Pasuruan telah melakukan beberapa upaya dalam mengefektifkan mediasi mulai dari ditetapkannya beberapa hakim mediator dengan dikeluarkannya Surat Keputusan oleh Ketua Pengadilan, serta mengupayakan dengan menyediakan ruang khusus mediasi dan papan nama-nama mediator yang memudahkan para pihak yang bersengketa dalam memilih mediator. Bahwasanya mediasi masih kurang begitu efektif dalam menyelesaikan masalah perceraian. Penyebab paling utama dalam hal ini adalah kelemahan kesadaran, egoisme dan tidak adanya kemauan kuat untuk damai. Dualisme fungsi mediator yang juga berperan sebagai Hakim memberikan pengaruh bagi mediasi yang dilakukannya. Diperlukan adanya mediator non Hakim ataupun mediator bersertifikat yang lebih berpengalaman untuk dapat lebih meningkatkan keberhasilan proses mediasi. Keberhasilan mediasi yang hanya sepuluh persen tersebut dikarenakan beberapa hal, yaitu kemampuan membawa suasana saat mediasi yang terkadang di selingi dengan gurauan kecil agar suasana tidak kaku. Selanjutnya yaitu kesabaran mediator yang mana hal ini merupakan poin utama dalam mediasi, sebab pihak berperkara dengan keadaan psikologi mereka yang berselisih tentunya akan membuat suasana menjadi kurang nyamanKata kunci: Mediasi, perkara, perceraianThe Pasuruan religious court has made several efforts in effective mediation ranging from the establishment of several judges to the mediator with the issuance of decree by the Chairman of the Court, and sought by providing a special space of mediation and the name Board of the mediator that facilitates the parties who dispute in selecting a mediator. The mediation is still less effective in resolving divorce problems. The main cause in this case is the weakness of consciousness, selfishness and lack of strong will for peace. Dualism functions of mediators who also act as judges influence the mediation he does. It is necessary for a non-professional mediator or a more experienced certified mediator to further enhance the success of the mediation process. The success of mediation is only ten percent due to several things, which is the ability to bring the atmosphere when mediation is sometimes interspersed with small jokes so that the atmosphere is not stiff. Furthermore, the patience mediator which is the main point in the mediation, because the parties litigated with the psychological state of the dispute will certainly make the atmosphere becomes less comfortableKeywords: mediation, matters, divorce
19
Askaruddin, Muh, Dachran Busthami y Hasan Kadir. "Efektifitas Mediasi Terhadap Perkara Perceraian Di Pengadilan Agama Kelas 1a Watampone". Kalabbirang Law Journal 2, n.º 1 (30 de abril de 2020): 1–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.35877/454ri.kalabbirang26.
Resumen
Tujuan penelitian mengungkap efektivitas mediasi dalam perkara perceraian di Pengadilan Agama Kelas 1A Watampone. Berdasarkan hasil analisa efektivitas mediasi dalam perkara perceraian di Pengadilan Agama Kelas 1A Watampone, menunjukan bahwa mediasi belum efektif. Faktor-faktor penyebabnya adalah: Tingkat kepatuhan masyarakat yang menjalani proses mediasi sangat rendah. Fasilitas dan sarana mediasi di Pengadilan Agama Kelas 1A Watampone masih kurang memadai baik dari segi ruang mediasi maupun fasilitas penunjang didalamnya. Selain Ketua Pengadilan Agama Kelas 1A Watampone, hakim yang ditunjuk menjadi mediator seluruhnya belum mengikuti pelatihan mediasi yang diselenggrakan oleh Mahkamah Agung Republik Indonesia. Penempatan pelaksanaan mediasi di Pengadilan Agama tidak tepat atau tidak sesuai dengan apa yang telah digariskan oleh Allah swt., dalam QS al-Nisa>’/4: 35, tentang kedudukan dan kewenangan hakam (mediator) dalam menyelesaikan konflik yang terjadi dalam rumah tangga.
The purpose of the study revealed the mediation method in divorce cases in the Class 1A Religious Court of Watampone. Based on the results of the analysis of mediation in divorce cases in Watampone Class 1A Religious Courts, it shows that mediation has not been effective. The contributing factors are: The level of community participation that supports the mediation process is very low. Mediation facilities and facilities in the Class 1A Religious Court of Watampone are still inadequate in terms of mediation space and supporting facilities therein. In addition to the Chairperson of Class 1A Religious Court Watampone, the judge appointed to be a mediator had fully received mediation training conducted by the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia. Placement of mediation in the Religious Courts is not right or not in accordance with what has been outlined by God Almighty.
20
Ilyas, Ilyas, Syahrizal Abbas y Iman Jauhari. "Efektivitas Peran Hakim Sebagai Mediator Dalam Penyelesaian Perkara Perdata di Mahkamah Syar’iyah Jantho". Syiah Kuala Law Journal 1, n.º 1 (19 de noviembre de 2018): 83–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.24815/sklj.v1i1.12241.
Resumen
Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 Tentang Prosedur Mediasi di Pengadilan menyatakan bahwa mediasi merupakan salah satu tahapan proses persidangan di pengadilan. Dalam pelaksanaanya terdapat beberapa hambatan di MahkamahSyar’iyah Jantho. Faktor penyebabnya yaitu pertama, pelaksanaan mediasi belum mengacu pada prosedur mediasi yang sudah ditentukan, keseriusan hakim mediator belum maksimal, itikad baik dari para pihak dan hakim mediator kurang serius. kedua, kualitas perkara sudah cukup berat, para pihak yang berperkara sebelum masalahnya tersebut sampai ke Mahkamah Syar’iyah Jantho sudah ditangani beberapa kali baik oleh pihak non formal maupun formal. Ketiga, kurangnya pemahaman para pihak terhadap pentingnya proses mediasi. Keempat, Ada anggapan dari Hakim mediator bahwa tugas menjadi mediator adalah tugas tambahan yang terasa terbebani baginya, juga menganggap dengan proses mediasi akan memperlambat putusnya perkara dan akan mempengaruhi nilainya sebagai hakim.The Regulation of the Supreme Court Number 1, 2016 on the Mediation Procedure in a Trial states that mediation is one of the process stages in a trial. There are several obstacles found in the mediation process at the Sharia Court of Jantho. These are resulted from firstly, it has not been referring to the mediation procedure, the judge mediators’ efforts have not been maximal yet, the parties good faith and the mediator judges are less serious. Secondly, the case is serious enough, the litigants have asked the cases solved by both non-formal and formal parties several times. Thirdly, the lack of understanding of the parties to the importance of the process. Finally, there is a presumption by the judges mediating the cases that being a mediator is an additional task that is not easy, and some assume that the process slowing the decision and devalue judge’s roles.
21
Karmawan, Karmawan. "Pendekatan Keagamaan Mediator Terhadap Para Pihak Dalam Perkara Perceraian di Pengadilan Agama". Alim | Journal of Islamic Education 1, n.º 1 (2 de abril de 2019): 227–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.51275/alim.v1i1.134.
Resumen
The religious knowledge possessed by the mediator becomes the basis for the case in the religious court, the religious court provides space for the mediator to improve his ability so that the mediated case is not in the form of a decision from a panel of judges but in the form of a peace deed. The mediator uses a religious approach to be understood by the parties considering separating. Because the religious approach is considered more rational in the family problem back to the teachings of Islam, not disagree with each other. The mediator of the religious court provides religious knowledge in the form of advice to the parties in the event of a divorce which is certainly sacrificed by the problems of the position of husband and wife, issues of property and status of children who are victims of the separation of their parents
22
Sartika Dewi. "PROSES MEDIASI DALAM PERKARA PERCERAIAN DI PENGADILAN AGAMA KARAWANG DIHUBUNGKAN DENGAN PERATURAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG TAHUN 2016 TENTANG PROSEDUR MEDIASI DI PENGADILAN". Justisi Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 5, n.º 1 (1 de septiembre de 2020): 26–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.36805/jjih.v5i1.1268.
Resumen
Mediasi merupakan cara penyelesaian sengketa yang cepat, sederhana dan biaya yang ringan, mediasi merupakan penyelesaian sengketa dengan cara damai yang dibantu pihak ketiga yaitu mediator. Pelaksanaan mediasi dalam penyelesaian perkara perdata di Pengadilan pada hakikatnya merupakan bentuk implementasi dari musyawarah mufakat. Hal ini diatur dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 Tentang Prosedur Mediasi di Pengadilan. Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui prosedur proses mediasi di pengadilan agama, faktor yang mempengaruhi dan sejauhmana keberhasilan proses mediasi dalam mencapai kesepakatan damai di Pengadilan agama. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah Penelitian kualitatif yaitu dilaksanakan untuk membangun pengetahuan melalui pemahaman dan penemuan. Pendekatan penelitian kualitatif adalah suatu proses penelitian dan pemahaman yang berdasarkan pada masalah manusia. Hasil dari penelitian ini adalah proses dari mediasi terdiri dari Pra mediasi dan proses mediasi selama kurang lebih 30 hari. Faktor yang mempengaruhi proses mediasi diantarnya kualifikasi mediator, kepatuhan masyarakat, fasilitas, itikad baik para pihak
Kata kunci: Mediasi di Pengadilan, Perkara Perceraian, Pengadilan Agama Karawang
Mediation is a way of resolving disputes that is fast, simple and low cost, mediation is a peaceful settlement of disputes assisted by a third party, namely a mediator. The implementation of mediation in the settlement of civil cases in court is essentially a form of implementation of consensus agreement. This is regulated in the Supreme Court Regulation No.1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures in Courts. The purpose of this study was to determine the procedures for the mediation process in religious courts, the factors that influence and the extent of the success of the mediation process in reaching a peace agreement in religious courts. The method used in this research is qualitative research, which is carried out to build knowledge through understanding and discovery. A qualitative research approach is a process of research and understanding based on human problems. The result of this research is the process of mediation consisting of pre-mediation and mediation process for approximately 30 days. The factors that influence the mediation process include the qualifications of the mediator, community compliance, facilities, and good faith of the parties.
Keyword: Mediation in Court, Divorce Case, Karawang Religious Court
23
Husain, Sri Wahyuni. "Mediation Optimization in Gorontalo Religion Court". Al-Mizan 13, n.º 2 (1 de diciembre de 2017): 204–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.30603/am.v13i2.854.
Resumen
This study aims to determine the optimization of the implementation of mediation in the Gorontalo Religious Court. This research is a field research with data collection methods in the form of observations, interviews and documentation. Data’s were analyzed using qualitative descriptive. The results of the study found that the implementation of mediation in the Gorontalo Religious Court was not yet fully optimal. Based on the cases decided by the Gorontalo Religious Court in 2016 totaling 1524 and entering the mediation process as many as 87 cases and only 1 case that was successfully mediated (0.1%). Factor failure of the mediation process because the mediation room facilities are still not efficient enough, because the parties to queue, even some mediator judges carry out mediation in the judge's room itself, there is no certified mediator as explained in the Minister of Religion Regulation (PERMA) Number 1 of 2016 about Procedure for Mediation at Court.
24
Riyanto, R. Benny. "REMODELLING AND REPOSITIONING OF COURT’S MEDIATION IN INDONESIA". Diponegoro Law Review 1, n.º 1 (7 de octubre de 2016): 28. http://dx.doi.org/10.14710/dilrev.1.1.2016.28-46.
Resumen
This article is intended to explain the failure of the use of mediation in Indonesia, particularly mediation which is integrated with the court (court connected mediation). The focus of the problem in this study is about the ideal model of court connected mediation as a strategy to achieve the hope of strengthening and to maximize the function of judiciary institutions in resolving dispute in Indonesia. A method of socio-legal research is used to reveal things that make mediation has not worked effectively in resolving civil case in court. This study resulted that the practice of mediation in civil court is very limited, especially dealing with a model applied by mediators, so it is not always appropriate to the situation faced by the parties in disputes. Moreover, although the Supreme Court Regulation allows co-mediation, in practice, it is never implemented. Even court connected mediation has become part of the dispute because it has been registered and published to public. So that it becomes a non-legal factor that influence the parties to reach agreement. Keywords : mediation, mediator, civil case, model, court.
25
Saravistha, Dely Bunga. "Peran Ganda Hakim Sebagai Mediator Bagi Penyelesaian Perkara Perdata Di Pengadilan Terkait Kode Etik Profesi". Jurnal Ilmiah Raad Kertha 3, n.º 1 (9 de julio de 2020): 17–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.47532/jirk.v3i1.166.
Resumen
The integration of mediation by the Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of2016 on Mediation Procedure Court (hereinafter called Perma 1 of 2016) has given newduties and responsibilities of judges, which in addition to being a judge is also requiredto perform the function of mediator. Mediator and Judge are both legal profession, eachof which has a Code of Ethics and professional characteristics. This research is anormative law, the legal research that lay down the law as a system of building norms inthe form of principles, norms, rules of law, court decisions, agreements and doctrines ofexperts. Perma existence in 2016 has made judges have dual roles that are mutuallycontradictory. The impact of the position and the dual role of judges in the courts is anaccumulation of case files still occur because of the number of judges is not proportionalto the intensity of incoming cases and also due to judges who dominate the judicialmediation process is still very rare to see success. So that the existence of mediation onlybe impressed stalling settling disputes.
26
Trezubov, Egor y Ekaterina Isakova. "Mediation Innovations in the Context of the Judicial Policy of Modern Russia". Bulletin of Kemerovo State University. Series: Humanities and Social Sciences 2020, n.º 1 (12 de mayo de 2020): 88–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.21603/2542-1840-2020-4-1-88-94.
Resumen
The article deals with mediation, or reconciliation of the parties, as a new procedure in the Russian civil judicial practice. The main advantage of judicial reconciliation is in the status of a mediator. As a rule, the mediator is a retired experienced judge who explains the law and the relevant judicial practice to the participants. However, mediation does not reduce the judicial load; it neither curtails the time of the trial nor saves the budget costs. Mediation, as well as other alternative methods of dispute settlement, can be actively applied only in a legally and economically developed society. Therefore, Russian judicial reconciliation has a long way to go. At the moment, the lack of real financial support from the government is an insurmountable obstacle for mediation. Moreover, the number of mediators differs from region to region. Therefore, the new practice needs combined efforts of the entire judicial system, from local courts to the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation. Mediation is effective only if it means persuasion of the parties to reconciliation and proper governmental financing.
27
Lizuardi, Amiril, Sudirman Sudirman y Ahmad Izzuddin. "Iktikat Baik Para Pihak dalam Pelaksanaan Mediasi di Pengadilan Agama". Journal de Jure 9, n.º 2 (30 de diciembre de 2017): 63. http://dx.doi.org/10.18860/j-fsh.v9i2.6807.
Resumen
<p class="isi">This article aims to describe the principle of good faith in the Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation in the Court while at the same time describing the implementation of the principle of good faith in the conduct of mediation in the Malang District Religious Court. This research is included in empirical research using a qualitative approach. The results of the discussion of this article indicate that Mediation is an inseparable part of the procedure in the Religious Courts as stipulated in the Indonesian Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2016 concerning Procedure for Mediation in Courts. In the Republic of Indonesia's Supreme Court Regulation Number, 1 of 2016, the provisions of good faith in the implementation of mediation were added. The mediator has the authority to evaluate the intentions of the parties during the mediation.</p>Artikel ini bertujuan mendeskripsikan asas iktikad baik dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 tentang Mediasi di Pengadilan sekaligus mendeskripsikan implementasi asas iktikad baik dalam pelaksanaan mediasi di Pengadilan Agama Kabupaten Malang. Penelitian ini termasuk dalam penelitan empiris dengan menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif. Hasil pembahasan artikel ini menunjukkan bahwa Mediasi merupakan bagian yang tidak dapat dipisahkan dari prosedur beracara di Pengadilan Agama sebagaimana diatur dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 tentang Prosedur Mediasi di Pengadilan. Dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Agung RI Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 ditambahkan tentang ketentuan iktikad baik dalam pelaksanaan mediasi. Mediator memiliki wewenang untuk melakukan penilaian terhadap iktikad para pihak selama pelaksanaan mediasi.
28
Pryahina, Marina y Natalia Potlachuk. "On the question of the psychological component of family mediation". Vestnik of the St. Petersburg University of the Ministry of Internal Affairs of Russia 2021, n.º 2 (8 de julio de 2021): 230–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.35750/2071-8284-2021-2-230-237.
Resumen
The relevance of the topic under consideration is due to the need to improve the effectiveness of family mediation. The presented statistical data of the Supreme Court of the Russian Federation, the Center for Conflict Resolution of the St. Petersburg State Budgetary Institution «CCSP» indicates the low effectiveness of the alternative procedure for settling family disputes with the participation of a mediator. Analyzing the reasons for this, the authors turn to the world experience in the development of family mediation, focused on the development of standards for training specialists on the basis of serious psychological training.
The Russian professional standard «Specialist in Mediation (mediator)» in a specialized field of activity sets the requirements for the special knowledge and skills of a mediator in the field of social, humanistic, cognitive psychology, psychological correction of attitudes, perception, and emotional response. However, the analysis of the basic training program for mediators in the family mediation module, as well as the training programs for mediators offered by Russian higher education organizations, indicates that there is no serious psychological training for mediators to resolve disputes arising from family legal relationships.
The authors’ practical first-hand experience makes it possible to highlight the psychological component of family conflicts, which significantly distinguishes family mediation from mediation in the field of civil or labor disputes and requires a mediator to have competencies in the field of family psychodiagnostics, family counseling and therapy. The authors substantiate a number of methodological and technological provisions of the family mediation procedure.
29
Gios Adhyaksa, Fitri Purnamasari, Diding Rahmat Dan. "PELAKSANAAN MEDIASI PADA PENYELESAIAN PERCERAIAN DI PENGADILAN AGAMA KUNINGAN". UNIFIKASI : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 4, n.º 2 (4 de diciembre de 2017): 98. http://dx.doi.org/10.25134/unifikasi.v4i2.729.
Resumen
AbstractThe author conducted this research with the background of the implementation of Mediation in Kuningan Religious Court in Kuningan. The purposes of writing this paper are to know how the Implementation on Divorce Settlement in Kuningan Religious Court and to know the factors that affect the success of mediation in the Kuningan Religious Court. The method used in this research is with empirical juridical approach using primary data and secondary data and data collection techniques are interviews, observation and literature study. The results of this research are the mediation arrangements set out in the Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA ) Number 1 Year 2016 about Mediation Procedures in Courts and more specifically stipulated in the Decree of the Chief Justice Number 108 / KMA / AK / VI / 2016 on Mediation Governance at the Court. Mediation is the means of dispute resolution through the negotiation process to obtain agreement of the Parties with the assistance of the Mediator. Mediator is a Judge or any other party who has a Mediator Certificate as a neutral party assisting Parties in the negotiation process to see possible dispute resolution without resorting to the disconnection or enforcement of a settlement. Its implementation has been regulated in Law Number 1 Year 1974 about concerning Marriage, Compilation of Islamic Law, and Supreme Court RegulationNumber 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedure in Court. The conclusion of this thesis writing is Mediation which should be one of the alternative process of dispute settlement which can give greater access to justice to the parties in finding satisfactory dispute settlement and to fulfill the sense of justice, and become one of the effective instrument to overcome the problem of case buildup especially for the case Divorce, in the end has not been effectively implemented.Keywords: Mediation, Divorce, Marriage.�AbstrakPenulis melakukan penelitian ini dengan latar belakang yaitu bagaimana pelaksanaan Mediasi pada Pengadilan Agama Kuningan. Tujuan penulisan ini untuk mengetahui bagaimana Pelaksanaan pada Penyelesaian Perceraian di Pengadilan Agama Kuningan dan untuk mengetahui bagaimana faktor-faktor yang memepengaruhi keberhasilan mediasi di Pengadilan Agama Kuningan. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah dengan pendekatan yuridis empiris dengan menggunakan data primer dan data sekunder serta alat pengumpulan data yang digunakan melalui wawancara, observasi dan studi pustaka. Hasil penelitian ini adalah pengaturan mediasi diatur dalam Peraturan Mahkamah Agung (PERMA) Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 tentang Prosedur Mediasi di Pengadilan dan lebih spesifik diatur dalam Keputusan Ketua Mahkamah Agung Nomor : 108/KMA/AK/VI/2016 tentang Tata Kelola Mediasi di Pengadilan. Mediasi adalah cara penyelesaian sengketa melalui proses perundingan untuk memperoleh kesepakatan Para Pihak dengan dibantu oleh Mediator. Mediator adalah Hakim atau pihak lain yang memiliki Sertifikat Mediator sebagai pihak netral yang membantu Para Pihak dalam proses perundingan guna mencari berbagai kemungkinan penyelesaian sengketa tanpa menggunakan cara memutus atau memaksakan sebuah penyelesaian. Pelaksanaannya telah di atur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 1 Tahun 1974 tentang Perkwinan, Kompilasi Hukum Islam, dan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 tentang Prosedur Mediasi di Pengadilan. Kesimpulan dari penulisan skripsi ini adalah Mediasi yang seharusnya menjadi salah satu alternatif proses penyelesaian sengketa yang dapat memberikan akses keadilan yang lebbesar kepada para pihak dalam menemukan penyelesaian sengketa yang memuaskan dan mmemenuhi rasa keadilan, serta menjadi salah satu instrumen efektif mengatasi masalah penumpukan perkara khususnya untuk perkara perceraian, pada akhirnya belum efektif dilaksanakan.Kata Kunci : Mediasi, Perceraian, Perdata
30
Maisa, Maisa. "Penyelesaian Pembagian Harta Bersama Melalui Mediasi Di Pengadilan Negeri Kelas IA Palu". Journal of Lex Philosophy (JLP) 1, n.º 2 (31 de diciembre de 2020): 260–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.52103/jlp.v1i2.311.
Resumen
Tujuan penelitjan menganalisis penyelesaian pembagian harta bersama melalui Mediasi di Pengadilan Negeri Kelas IA Palu dan Apa sajakah hambatan-hambatan dalam pelaksanaan mediasi dalam perkara pembagian harta bersama di Pengadilan Negeri Kelas IA Palu. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode penelitian normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Mekanisme penyelesaian pembagian harta gono gini melalui Mediasi di Pengadilan Negeri Kelas IA Palu bahwa setiap perkara yang telah ditunjuk majelis hakim memeriksa perkara terlebih dahulu, kemudian ditempuh mediasi dengan menunjuk mediator oleh majelis hakim. Selanjutnya mediator sebagai fasilitator menetapkan waktu pertemuan untuk melakukan mediasi, artinya dalam proses mediasi mediator berperan membantu/menengahi agar kesepakatan antara para pihak tentang pembagian harta bersama dapat terwujud atas dasar musyawarah. Selanjutnya jika kesepaktan terwujud, maka dibuat akta perdamaian yang dibantu oleh mediator dalam tinjauan yuridisnya. Kemudian dengan laporan mediator, perkara kembali kepada majelis hakim untuk menyikapi akta perdamaian dan Hambatan-hambatan dalam pelaksanaan mediasi dalam perkara pembagian harta gono gini di Pengadilan Negeri Kelas I A Palu adalah ketidakhadiran salah satu para pihak, Kuasa Hukum para pihak yang kurang maksimal memberikan penjelasan mengenai manfaat mediasi dan adanya ego yang berlebihan dari masing-masing pihak.
The research objective to analyze the settlement of the distribution of joint assets through Mediation at the Palu IA Class District Court and what are the obstacles in the implementation of mediation in the case of sharing assets together in the Class IA Palu District Court. The research method used is normative research method. The results showed that the settlement mechanism for the distribution of assets gono gini through Mediation in the Class IA Palu District Court that every case that has been appointed by the panel of judges examines the case first, then goes through mediation by appointing a mediator by the panel of judges. Furthermore, the mediator as the facilitator determines the meeting time to conduct mediation, meaning that in the mediation process the mediator plays a role in assisting / mediating so that the agreement between the parties regarding the sharing of collective assets can be realized on the basis of deliberation. Furthermore, if the agreement is realized, a peace deed will be drawn up which is assisted by the mediator in his juridical review. Then with the mediator's report, the case returned to the panel of judges to address the peace deed and Obstacles in the implementation of mediation in the case of distributing assets at the IA Class District Court in Palu was the absence of one of the parties, the legal counsel of the parties who were not maximal in providing an explanation regarding the benefits of mediation and the excessive ego of each party.
31
Mahrus, Ahmad Falih. "Kekuatan Hukum Penyelesaian Sengketa Waris Melalui Mediator Tokoh Masyarakat di Desa Wonosalam Kecamatan Wonosalam Kabupaten Demak". AL-HUKAMA' 9, n.º 1 (3 de junio de 2019): 47–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.15642/alhukama.2019.9.1.47-75.
Resumen
This article is a field research to answer the role of community leaders as mediators in the settlement of inheritance disputes in Wonosalam, Demak and how the legal power of resolving inheritance disputes through mediator community leaders in Wonosalam, Demak. Research data are collected through interviews and observations, then are analyzed with descriptive analytical techniques with inductive thought pattern. Wonosalam community leaders have an important role in the settlement of inheritance disputes, namely as a mediator, including: opening and leading the mediation process, explaining and determining the heirs' parts, providing the best advice and solutions, deciding and determining what has been agreed by the parties to the dispute, preventing the emergence of even bigger disputes, and still maintaining harmony and harmony in social life. The results of the settlement of inheritance disputes through mediators of community leaders in Wonosalam do not have an enforceable legal force, because they are not confirmed by making a peace certificate or a peace agreement letter, which is contained in: article 27 of the Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures and article 1851 Civil Code. Nevertheless, the determination of community leaders as mediators in the settlement of inheritance disputes is obeyed and implemented by the people of Wonosalam.
32
Pui, Velis Alicia. "Analisis Yuridis Penyelesaian Sengketa Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Terhadap Tenaga Kerja Asing Melalui Mediasi (Studi Penelitian di Dinas Tenaga Kerja Kota Batam)". Wajah Hukum 4, n.º 2 (19 de octubre de 2020): 445. http://dx.doi.org/10.33087/wjh.v4i2.201.
Resumen
In industrial relations there will always be unwanted events that occur, either because of misunderstanding or dissatifaction from one of the parties. If it has been attemped through negotiations but has not found a peaceful way, then another way is taken, one of which is mediation. Resolving disputes over termination of employment through a mediation process in the Batam City Manpower Office by mediator. Mediator is one of the institutions provided by the government to help provide solutions to disputes that occur between employers and workers. Striving for mediation is to provide a sense of justice and at a low cost to the disputing parties.Iif both parties do not accept the advice of the mediator, the parties can submit an application to the Industrial Relations Court. The termination of employment must refer to the legal basis of employment, it is recommended in industrial relations disputes to always be through a non-litigation method in advance to save time and money, if no agreement is reached, then submit the application to the Court.
33
Mamdud, Rijal. "Dakwah Islam di Media Massa". Al-I'lam: Jurnal Komunikasi dan Penyiaran Islam 3, n.º 1 (25 de septiembre de 2019): 47. http://dx.doi.org/10.31764/jail.v3i1.1366.
Resumen
Abstrak:Kemajuan teknologi saat ini, telah mengantarkan perubahan dalam segala aspek kehidupan manusia khususnya dalam pemenuhan informasi. Masyarakat modern dalam memenuhi kebutuhan informasinya lebih mengandalkan media massa sebagai solusinya. Karena lebih mudah, cepat dan hemat, termasuk pemenuhan informasi tentang pengetahuan agamaan mereka. Mereka tinggal duduk manis didepan kotak ajaib (internet, radio, koran dan televisi), semua kebutuhan dan keingintahuannya akan tercukupi, mereka yaitu masyarakat menganggap apa yang di tampilkan dan ditayangkan oleh media massa adalah sebuah kebenaran yang tidak perlu diragukan lagi. Sehingga semua yang ada dimedia massa, masyarakat cenderung akan meniru atau melakukan apa yang di lihat dan di dengarkannya. Oleh karenanya dalam tulisan ini penulis akan membahas tentang bagaimana masyarakat muslim memeahami agama dengan pesan-pesan dakwah islami yang baik dari media massa yaitu baik dari internet dan televisi. Realita lain mengatakan bahwa para pelaku dan pemilik media massa sekarang ini kebanyakan dari kalangan non muslim. Pastinya pesan dan informasi yang disampaikan lewat mediamassa juga akan sangat dipengaruhi oleh pengelolanya. Karena kita tahu bahwa media tidak bebas nilai. Sehingga fenomena tersebut juga menjadi perhatian penulis dalam kesempatan kali ini. Tulisan ini menunjukan bahwa dakwah lewat media massa menjadi sebuah keharusan. Baik lewat media massa berbentuk, koran, televisi, internet, majalah atau yang lainnya. Karena menurut hemat penulis kegiatan dakwah adalah kegiatan mengajak, dan untuk konteks sekarang kegiatan mengajak akan lebih efektif dan efisien apabila lewat media massa. Sehingga kegiatan dakwah natinya akan lebih banyak dirasakan manfaatnya oleh semua kalangan masyarakat. Abstract:This study addresses two main issues, namely: 1) How is mediator interpersonal communication with litigants in the divorce process in the Tulungagung Religious Court?. To answer this problem, researchers used descriptive qualitative methods oriented to divorce case studies that took place in the Tulungagung District Religious Court. In order to obtain detailed data results, researchers used three methods of data collection, namely interviews, observation and documentation as non-human data sources. The results showed that 1) Mediators applied 5 principles of interpersonal communication in conducting mediation with litigants in divorce cases at the Tulungagung Religion court, namely: empathy, respect, can be heard or understood, clarity of messages, and a humble attitude that was shown through attitude and speech mediator, 2) The success of the mediator in interpersonal communication to reduce divorce rates in the Tulungagung Religious Court is caused by the firm and neutral attitude of the mediator in directing the litigant party and the open attitude of the litigant party.However, on the other hand, interpersonal communication sometimes shows low success because of the problem of complicated bargaining related to property, the firm attitude of the parties to divorce, and reluctance to follow the mediation process as a way to speed up the divorce process.
34
Darma, Made Wirya, I. Gusti Agung Ayu Mas Triwulandari y I. Gede Agus Kurniawan. "The Principle of Iknemook for Mediator in Medical Malpractice Dispute Settlement Through Mediation". Jurnal Magister Hukum Udayana (Udayana Master Law Journal) 9, n.º 1 (31 de mayo de 2020): 37. http://dx.doi.org/10.24843/jmhu.2020.v09.i01.p03.
Resumen
The agreement is made to undertake a treatment for an illness, which resulted in the conclusion of a therapeutic contract under Laws as regulated under Article 1233 of the Civil Code of Indonesia (Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata). Every legal relationship will result in rights and obligations. Medical malpractice is usually caused by an unfulfillment of a patient’s basic rights because of the lack of communication or information, which are the basic rights of a patient. The dispute settlement through court system is unsatisfactory for either patient or doctor. Therefore, a dispute settlement that is considered ideal is through non-litigation process, which is mediation, to achieve win-win solution. Procedures for mediators to mediate such malpractice dispute are in accordance to seven principles, which are also regarded as the seven bbaasic philosophies of mediation for medical dispute, which are known as the principle of Iknemook. The contents of the Iknemook principle for mediator in medical malpractice dispute settlement through mediation are the problems in this research. This research aims to assess and study the seven principles of Iknemook for mediator in medical malpractice dispute settlement through mediation. This research is categorised as a library research with a specification of descriptive research, which is presented to explain Iknemook principles for mediator in medical malpractice dispute settlement through mediation. This research finds that the principles comprised of the principles of good faith of both parties, trust, neutrality, exclusivity of a mediator (med-power), open-mind, autonomy, and confidentiality.
35
Siregar, Muhammad Yusuf. "IMPLEMENTASI PERATURAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG REPUBLIK INDONESIA NOMOR 1 TAHUN 2016 TENTANG PROSEDUR MEDIASI DI PENGADILAN (Study Putusan Pengadilan Agama Rantauprapat No. No.487/Pdt.G/2020/PA-RAP Jo Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Medan No.73/Pdt.G/2020/PTA-MDN)". JURNAL ILMIAH ADVOKASI 8, n.º 2 (15 de septiembre de 2020): 72–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.36987/jiad.v8i2.1854.
Resumen
This study aims to analyze the legal aspects of the implementation of the Supreme Court Regulation No. 1 of 2016 on Mediation Procedures in Courts (Study of Rantauprapat Religious Court Decision No. 487 / Pdt.G / 2020 / PA-RAP Jo Medan High Court Decision No. 73 / Pdt.G / 2020 / PTA-MDN. This research is Normative Empirical, which is research by looking at conditions in the field by linking the source of laws and regulations in force in the Republic of Indonesia. The benefits that will be received from the results of this study are to find out and analyzing the legal position of the Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures in Courts and To find out and analyze the Implementation of the Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures in Courts in the Rantauprapat Religious Court Decision No.487 / Pdt .G / 2020 / PA-RAP Jo Medan High Court Decision No.73 / Pdt.G / 2020 / PTA-MDN. The results of the research show that the provisions of the Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2008 and / or Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2016 concerning Mediation Procedures in Courts in article 02 paragraph 04 states that "Judges in consideration of the decision of a case must state that the case concerned has strived for peace through Mediation by stating the name of the Mediator for the case concerned. The position of Mediation as stated in the Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Number 1 of 2016 is one of the steps that must be taken in carrying out the Judicial system which is based on the decision of the Medan High Court Panel of Judges declaring that to completely reject the Plaintiff's Lawsuit with the Consideration that the case has been taken through the Mediation route although not maximally and His legal consideration is that the position of the witnesses presented by the Plaintiff is a witness who did not see the Plaintiff and Defendant fighting, but only told the story of the Plaintiff. Keywords: Implementation, Procedure, Mediation
36
Heisterkamp, Brian L. "Conversational displays of mediator neutrality in a court-based program". Journal of Pragmatics 38, n.º 12 (diciembre de 2006): 2051–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.pragma.2006.03.005.
37
Keller, David B. "Negotiatory Alchemy: The Court Special Master as Scientist and Mediator". Negotiation Journal 13, n.º 4 (octubre de 1997): 389–408. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1571-9979.1997.tb00141.x.
38
Bahrun, Bahrun, Syahrizal Abbas y Iman Jauhari. "Peranan Hakim Mediator Dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Harta Bersama Pasca Perceraian di Mahkamah Syar’iyah". Syiah Kuala Law Journal 2, n.º 3 (30 de noviembre de 2018): 371–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.24815/sklj.v2i3.11718.
Resumen
Pasal 4 ayat (1) dan (2) Perma Nomor 1 Tahun 2016 menyatakan bahwa wajib terlebih dahulu diupayakan penyelesaian melalui mediasi, begitu pula Pasal 17 ayat (1) Hakim Pemeriksa Perkara mewajibkan Para Pihak menempuh Mediasi. Karena Mediasi diharapkan menjadi wadah pilihan untuk memperoleh solusi yang didasarkan pada kepentingan dan kebutuhan pihak. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menjelaskan peranan dan hambatan hakim mediator serta untuk mengetahui upaya yang dilakukan untuk mencegah dan mengatasi terjadinya hambatan tersebut. Jenis penelitian dengan pendekatan yuridis empiris. Teknik pengumpulan data melalui penelitian kepustakaan untuk data sekunder dan penelitian untuk memperoleh data primer. Analisis data yang digunakan adalah kualitatif. Berdasarkan penelitian diketahui peranan hakim mediator dalam menangani perkara/sengketa sudah berjalan, namun belum optimal. Terbukti dari 18 (delapan belas) kasus, jumlah kasus yang selesai melalui mediasi hanya 2 (dua) kasus, sedangkan tahun 2016 sampai 2017 belum ada kasus yang selesai melalui mediasi. Hal tersebut disebabkan jumlah mediator yang terbatas dan kurang memiliki kapastitas sumber daya yang memadai. Upaya untuk mencegahnya berupa sosialisasi manfaat mediasi dan mengikuti pelatihan mediasi serta mediasi harus dilakukan secara profesional. Ketua Mahkamah Syar’iyah Banda Aceh hendaknya melakukan sosialisasi manfaat Mediasi, dan Mahkamah Agung RI hendaknya mengevaluasi praktik mediasi dan menambah jumlah hakim.Article 4 paragraph (1) and (2) Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2016 states that it must first be pursued a settlement through mediation, as well as Article 17 paragraph (1) of the Judicial Examining Judge requiring the Parties to take Mediation. Because Mediation is expected to be a container of choice to obtain solutions that are based on the interests and needs of the parties. This research aims to know and explain the roles of mediator judges and obstacles faced by the judgesin settling the dispute of marital propertiesafter the divorce at Mahkamah Syar’iyah of Banda Aceh. This research also aims to know the efforts done to prevent and handlethe hurdles in settling the disputes post-divorce at Mahkamah Syar’iyah of Banda Aceh. This is juridical empirical research. The data are collectedthrough library research in order to obtain secondary data and field research is conducted in order to obtain primary data.This research applies qualitative analysis. Based on the research, it is known that the role of mediator judges in handling cases / disputes is already underway, but not optimal. It is evident from 18 cases, the number of cases completed through mediation is only 2 cases, whereas in 2016 until 2017 there have been no cases completed through mediation. This is due to the limited number of mediators and lack of adequate resource capacity. Efforts to prevent it in the form of socializing the benefits of mediation and participating in mediation and mediation training must be carried out professionally. The Chairperson of the Banda Aceh Syar'iyah Court should disseminate the benefits of Mediation, and the Indonesian Supreme Court should evaluate the practice of mediation and increase the number of judges.
39
Youping, Xu. "Mission impossible? Judges’ playing of dual roles as adjudicator and mediator in Chinese court conciliation". Semiotica 2017, n.º 216 (24 de mayo de 2017): 399–421. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/sem-2015-0074.
Resumen
AbstractDeeply rooted in the Confucian philosophy of harmony, court conciliation conducted by judges in Chinese courtroom has played an important role in resolving civil disputes in China. However, severe criticisms against court conciliation have never been ceased. Critics generally attribute problems to the integration of mediation into adjudication and judges’ playing of dual roles as adjudicator and mediator. Sadly, little has been done to explore how judges’ dual roles in court conciliation are performed and changed, and how the performance and change of judges’ dual roles may affect justice and fairness in dispute resolution. This paper compares the similarities and differences of a judge’s role as an adjudicator and the role of a mediator, analyzes how judges’ dual roles are performed and changed through different patterns of information flow and information sharing, and discusses the impacts of judges’ role change and ways to resolve role conflicts. It is found that similarities between the two roles make it possible for judges in CC to play dual roles, but different role expectations give rise to role conflicts which may, to some extent, be dissolved through effective ways of information exchange.
40
Mulcahy, Linda. "The Possibilities and Desirability of Mediator Neutrality - Towards an Ethic of Partiality?" Social & Legal Studies 10, n.º 4 (1 de diciembre de 2001): 505–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/a020411.
Resumen
This article draws on an empirical study of community mediation to question the possibility and desirability of mediator neutrality. It argues that, although the notion of neutrality is central to discussions of adjudication and mediation, debate on the topic remains intellectually flawed and empirically problematic. Emphasis on the aspirational nature of neutrality encourages us to ignore the suggestion that rather than facilitating fair process and outcome the standard of neutrality could serve to exacerbate existing inequalities between disputants. When discussed in the context of mediation the ideal becomes even more suspect as mediation promises 'alternatives' to the inadequacies of court-based adjudication. This article explores the questions raised by a group of mediators who rejected the possibility and desirability of mediation in favour of a more reflexive approach to third-party intervention in disputes. It suggests that, rather than aspiring to the empty goal of neutrality, we should be debating the possibility of partiality as an ethical standard to govern dispute resolution.
41
Taylor, Alison. "SHARED PARENTING-IS IT WORKING? REFLECTIONS BY A COURT SERVICE MEDIATOR". Family Court Review 27, n.º 2 (15 de marzo de 2005): 7–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.174-1617.1989.tb01292.x.
42
Butyrin, A. Yu, E. B. Stativa, O. V. Zhukova y A. V. Kapustkina. "The Forensic Construction Expert as a Mediator". Theory and Practice of Forensic Science 14, n.º 2 (13 de julio de 2019): 6–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.30764/1819-2785-2019-14-2-6-15.
Resumen
The issue of out-of-court settlement of disputes between participants in construction is considered. The relevance of the study stems from the excessive number of legal disputes of business entities. This fact requires a new perspective on the existing but still unpopular conciliation procedures, which can mitigate the burden of the judiciary. The mediation procedure seems to be the most attractive to the authors to that end. The article provides a range of advantages of turning the disputants to the mediator in comparison with the traditional judicial process. In this regard, the attention of the authors is focused on the mediator figure itself, the benefits of engaging an expert builder (a person competent in the field of construction who carries out forensic analysis on a permanent basis) are explained.The question of whether the participants in the construction industry are ready to resolve their economic disputes in the pretrial order is considered. According to the authors this is obstructed by: persistent paternalism firmly entrenched in the minds of the disputing parties, traditional distrust to the mediator as not having the authority, the exhaustiveness of the parties’ desire for unquestionable victory in the dispute and not for a compromise the inefficiency of the defensive practice using concealment or falsification of information, etc.In conclusion, the authors note the current unreadiness of the construction industry parties to actively participate in out-of-court settlement of disputes as well as a positive tendency among the Russian builders to using civilized forms of industrial interaction and express the hope that mediation will take its rightful place in the segment of public relations under consideration.
43
Sugianto, Fajar, Felicia Christina Simeon y Dea Prasetyawati Wibowo. "IDEALISASI SIFAT ALTERNATIF DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA MELALUI MEDIASI". Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune 3, n.º 2 (22 de julio de 2020): 253–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.30996/jhbbc.v3i2.3525.
Resumen
Abstract The purpose of the research is to make a law comparison related to disputes by mediation. This research is using normative method with empirical approach. Through this research the researcher offers an interesting development of dispute resolution through mediation where mediation is no longer used to settle disputes outside the court, but in it’s development mediation is also used to settle disputes in court, known as mediation in court. This phenomenon first developed in developed countries like United States before finally developed in Indonesia. Every people have their own various ways to obtain agreement in the case process or to resolve disputes and conflicts. One way to resolve disputes is through mediation. Mediation clearly involves third parties (both individuals and in the form of an independent institution) that are neutral and impartial, who will take a role as a mediator. The basic principles in mediating dispute resolution both in court and outside the court are still being carried out, such as the principles of confidentiality, neutrality, empowerment of the parties, and mediation results are sought to reach a win-win solution agreement.Keywords: dispute; mediation; mediatorAbstrak Tujuan penelitian yaitu melakukan perbandingan hukum terkait penyelesaian sengketa dengan cara mediasi. Menggunakan metode penelitian normatif dengan pendekatan empiris. Melalui penelitian ini peneliti menawarkan perkembangan yang menarik dari penyelesaian sengketa melalui mediasi dimana mediasi tidak lagi semata-mata digunakan untuk menyelesaikan sengketa di luar pengadilan saja, akan tetapi dalam perkembangannya mediasi juga digunakan untuk menyelesaikan sengketa di pengadilan, yang dikenal dengan mediasi di pengadilan. Fenomena ini lebih dulu berkembang di Negara-negara maju seperti di Amerika Serikat sebelum akhirnya berkembang di Indonesia. Setiap masyarakat memiliki berbagai macam cara untuk memperoleh kesepakatan dalam proses perkara atau untuk menyelesaikan sengketa dan konflik. Salah satu cara penyelesaian sengketa yang ada adalah melalui mediasi. Mediasi jelas melibatkan pihak ketiga (baik perorangan maupun dalam bentuk suatu lembaga independen) yang bersifat netral dan tidak memihak, yang akan berperan sebagai mediator. Prinsip-prinsip dasar dalam penyelesaian sengketa secara mediasi baik di pengadilan maupun di luar pengadilan tetap dijalankan, seperti prinsip kerahasian, netralitas, pemberdayaan para pihak, dan hasil mediasi diupayakan mencapai kesepakatan win-win solution.Kata kunci: mediasi; mediator; sengketa
44
Pyshna, Alla. "APPLICATION OF MEDIATION FOR SETTLEMENT OF ADMINISTRATIVE DISPUTES IN UKRAINE". Journal of International Legal Communication 1 (29 de junio de 2021): 197–204. http://dx.doi.org/10.32612/uw.27201643.2021.1.pp.197-204.
Resumen
The need to introduce the institution of mediation in the domestic legal system is based on the positive results of the practical application of the institution of reconciliation in many countries around the world, which indicates its effectiveness. The use of an alternative, non-judicial way of resolving disputes, particularly, mediation, will provide an opportunity to solve the problem of court congestion. The article is devoted to the research of the introduction of the practice of settling administrative disputes through the mediation procedure in Ukraine. The problematic issues that need to be regulated in the legislation have been identified, that are principles and procedure for conducting mediation: from its initiation to the moment of termination; the legal status of the mediator, particularly, the conditions for acquiring the status of a mediator, the content of his rights and obligations, liability for violation of the law on mediation, as well as the categories of disputes in which it can be used. The feature of administrative proceedings is that one of the parties in the dispute is the subject of power. Thus, the feature of alternative dispute resolution, in particular mediation, in administrative proceedings is the peaceful settlement of relations between a state agency, on the one hand, and with a natural or legal person, on the other. There are several possibilities for legalization of the status of a mediator: the first is the implementation of mediation by professional independent mediators (for example, members of a professional association of mediators); the second is judicial mediation: or the settlement of a dispute with the participation of a judge. The issues of determining the categories of cases in which mediation can be used, in particular administrative disputes, remain unresolved. Resolving these issues will help expand the practice of mediation in the settlement of administrative disputes.
45
Tillery, Win L. y Joseph C. Carfioli. "Frederick L.: A Review of the Litigation in Context". Exceptional Children 52, n.º 4 (enero de 1986): 367–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/001440298605200409.
Resumen
Frederick L. was identified as a learning disabled person in need of special education. Because the school district did not operate appropriate programs for students at or above grade 5, he was deprived of a program to meet his needs. The parents initiated a class action suit in the federal courts seeking an appropriate remedy. Throughout the course of litigation, the federal court has served a key role as mediator in effecting sweeping changes in programs for learning disabled students. These changes have provided for special education of the learning disabled from school entry to age 21 and include provisions for equal access to vocational training for exceptional persons.
46
Hasmawati, Hasmawati y Muhammad Akbar Fhad Syahril. "The Effectiveness of Mediation Process to Press Divorce Rates". Amsir Law Journal 1, n.º 2 (24 de abril de 2020): 78–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.36746/alj.v1i2.26.
Resumen
This study aims to determine and analyze how the effectiveness of mediation in overcoming divorce in the Palopo Religious Court and what are the factors to be successfully for the resolution of divorce cases in Palopo Religious Court. This study was conducted in Palopo Religious Court. The research method used empirical normative approach, the source of research data was field research and library research such as interviews and literature review of literature books and scientific works. The results of this study indicated that the effectiveness of mediation to overcome the divorce in the Palopo Religious Court is quite effective because it has been carried out with procedures in the mediation process. The successful factors of the divorce case in the Palopo Religious Court were good faith from both sides, the ability of a mediator to provide an explanation to the parties, and time also.
47
Payne, Julien D. y Eileen Overend. "The Co-Parental Divorce: Removing the Children from the Jurisdiction". Revue générale de droit 15, n.º 3 (9 de mayo de 2019): 645–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/1059529ar.
Resumen
The preservation of parenting rights in contested custody or access proceedings arising on the dissolution of marriage necessitates a judicial reconciliation or balancing of the competing interests of the children, the parents and members of any extended or reconstituted families. In C. v. C., (unreported, March 7, 1984, Ont. S.C.) the mother was held to the terms of a prior separation agreement and was ordered not to remove the children from the Province of Ontario without the father's consent or a further order of the court. In reaching this decision, the trial judge placed heavy reliance on the evidence of a mediator who had unsuccessfully attempted to resolve the differences between the parents and who was of the opinion that the children would be at risk if the mother proceeded with her plans to remarry and establish a new home for herself and the children in England. C. v. C. raises diverse fundamental issues concerning the legal resolution of parenting disputes on marriage breakdown or divorce. The following issues are addressed in the commentary of this judgment (reproduced in annex): 1. What significance, if any, does, and should, a court give to the express terms of a separation agreement? 2. If a mediator is retained, should the mediation process, including the mediator's evaluation, be “open” (i.e. subject to disclosure to the court) or “closed” (i.e. confidential and excluded from any evidence adduced in subsequent judicial proceedings)? 3. How can the best interests of the children — the legal criterion to be applied in the adjudication of parenting disputes — be reconciled with the best interests of other concerned family members? 4. Could, and should, the court have addressed the possibility of some alternative form of parenting arrangements that might accomodate the competing interests of all the affected parties? 5. To what extent can the courts legally fetter the freedom of a custodial parent to establish a new home for (i) herself (or himself) and (ii) the children? Some of these issues are specifically addressed in the unreported reasons for judgment. Others are ignored. The purpose of this commentary is to canvass these issues and point to the need for a family-oriented approach to the resolution of parenting disputes, rather than an individual rights approach, such as has been traditionally adhered to by the courts in the adjudication of custody and access disputes.
48
Rinalti, Rinalti, Syahabuddin Syahabuddin y Ermawati Ermawati. "Analysis of the Case of Divorce and Its Settlement in the Religious Court of Palu City". INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF CONTEMPORARY ISLAMIC LAW AND SOCIETY 2, n.º 1 (1 de agosto de 2020): 36–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.24239/ijcils.vol2.iss1.13.
Resumen
This paper discusses the cases of divorce and its settlement in the Religious Court of Palu. This study applied qualitative method with the data collection techniques that include observation, interview and written document. Data analysis was carried out through data reduction, presentation, verification and conclusion drawing. The result shows that the divorce proceedings handled by the Religious Court of Palu includes the applicants filed for divorce applications to the Religious Courts. Then, the Religious Courts make a number of lawsuit or application for divorce and file a summons. Furthermore, the panel of judges appointed a mediator to mediate between the litigating husband and wife. Conducting the first hearing with the agenda of reading the suit. The second hearing, listening to the response of the respondent or the defendant then delaying the decision. Listen to the testimonies of witnesses from each party. The panel of judges gives a decision on the case submitted and invites the respondent or the defendant to submit an appeal. The causes of divorce are adultery factors, drunkenness, drug consumption, gambling, leaving partner, imprisoned, polygamy, domestic violence. The majority couses of divorces are domestic violents and leaning parteners.
49
Gray, Ben y Fern Brunger. "(Mis)understandings and uses of ‘culture’ in bioethics deliberations over parental refusal of treatment: Children with cancer". Clinical Ethics 13, n.º 2 (6 de noviembre de 2017): 55–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1477750917738109.
Resumen
We developed this study to examine the issue of parental refusal of treatment, looking at the issue through a cultural competence lens. Recent cases in Canada where courts have declined applications by clinicians for court orders to overrule parental refusal of treatment highlight the dispute in this area. This study analyses the 16 cases of a larger group of 24 cases that were selected by a literature review where cultural or religious beliefs or ethnic identity was described as important reasons behind the refusal. The most significant finding was that nearly all of the cases cited unacceptable side effects as the main reason for declining treatment. We then analysed the detail of the cases and concluded that in the first instance a skilled clinical approach to develop an agreed management plan is by far the best approach. In the event that agreement cannot be reached we recommend engaging a mediator to help the clinician and parents/child to find an agreeable way forward. We argue that the option of seeking a court order was of significant detriment to many of the children in our cases and that this option should be used sparingly. There is a need for empirical research on the outcome of cases where a court order is sought.
50
Sufiarina, Sufiarina. "Shift of Criminal Acts of Copyrights to the Direction of Civil Dispute (Review of Article 95 Paragraph (4) of Law Number 28 Year 2014 on Copyright)". JURNAL CITA HUKUM 5, n.º 1 (6 de junio de 2017): 109–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.15408/jch.v5i1.6581.
Resumen
This article conducted a study about the obligation of mediation as a precondition for copyright infringement based on article 95 paragraphs (4) of the Law Number 28 of 2014 concerning Copyright. Mediation provisions in the Laws Number 30 of 1999 on Arbitration is a way of settlement of civil disputes outside the court to reach a settlement by consensus with the help of a mediator. While mediation is based on the supreme court rule number 1 of 2008 is intended as an obligation for judges at first instance in the district courts and religious courts in the settlement dispute resolution is the authority of commercial courts as special courts general judicial. But the commercial court does not apply the obligations mediation. A study conducted by the approach of the laws and regulations. By considering the crime of copyright as higly relevant to a complaint mediation prior obligations imposed as a condition of doing criminal charges. Article 95 paragraph 4 of the law number 28 of 2014 on copyright, which requires the completion of mediation prior to file criminal charges has brought about a shift in the field of copyright criminal offenses into civil disputes. Thus the obligation of mediation in the settlement of copyright disputes is not only necessary for a criminal offense, but also expanded as a condition for completion in litigation in the commercial courts. Artikel ini melakukan kajian terhadap kewajiban mediasi sebagai syarat untuk melakukan tuntutan pidana atas pelanggaran hak cipta berdasarkan Pasal 95 ayat (4) UU No. 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta. Ketentuan mediasi dalam Undang-Undang No. 30 Tahun 1999 tentang Arbitrase merupakan cara penyelesaian sengketa perdata di luar pengadilan untuk mencapai penyelesaian secara musyawarah mufakat dengan bantuan mediator. Sedangkan mediasi berdasarkan Perma No.1 tahun 2008, ditujukan sebagai kewajiban bagi hakim pada pengadilan tingkat pertama di Pengadilan Negeri maupun Pengadilan Agama dalam rangka penyelesaian sengketa keperdataan. Penyelesaian sengketa hak cipta merupakan kewenangan Pengadilan Niaga, sebagai pengadilan khusus di lingkungan peradilan umum. Namun di Pengadilan Niaga tidaklah berlaku kewajiban mediasi. Kajian dilakukan dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan (statuta aproacht). Dengan mengingat tindak pidana hak cipta sebagai delik aduan sangatlah relevan dibebankan kewajiban mediasi terlebih dahulu sebagai syarat melakukan tuntutan pidana. Pasal 95 ayat (4) UU No. 28 Tahun 2014 tentang Hak Cipta yang mensyaratkan penyelesaian mediasi terlebih dahulu untuk mengajukan tuntutan pidana, telah membawa konsekuensi pergeseran tindak pidana bidang hak cipta menjadi sengketa keperdataan. Dengan demikian kewajiban mediasi dalam penyelesaian sengketa hak cipta (HKI) tidak hanya diperlakukan bagi tindak pidana saja namun juga diperluas sebagai syarat untuk penyelesaian secara litigasi di Pengadilan Niaga. DOI: 10.15408/jch.v5i1.6581