Bibliografías temáticas / Deliberativ / Libros
Siga este enlace para ver otros tipos de publicaciones sobre el tema: Deliberativ.

Libros sobre el tema "Deliberativ"

Autor: Grafiati
Publicado: 4 de junio de 2021
Última modificación: 11 de febrero de 2022

Crea una cita precisa en los estilos APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard y otros

Elija tipo de fuente:

Consulte los 50 mejores mejores libros para su investigación sobre el tema "Deliberativ".

Junto a cada fuente en la lista de referencias hay un botón "Agregar a la bibliografía". Pulsa este botón, y generaremos automáticamente la referencia bibliográfica para la obra elegida en el estilo de cita que necesites: APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.

También puede descargar el texto completo de la publicación académica en formato pdf y leer en línea su resumen siempre que esté disponible en los metadatos.

Explore libros sobre una amplia variedad de disciplinas y organice su bibliografía correctamente.

1

Himmelroos, Staffan. Det demokratiska samtalet: En studie av deliberativ demokrati i ett medborgarforum. Åbo, Finland: Åbo Akademis förlag/Åbo Akademi University Press, 2012.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
2

Flügel-Martinsen, Oliver, Daniel Gaus, Tanja Hitzel-Cassagnes y Franziska Martinsen, eds. Deliberative Kritik - Kritik der Deliberation. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-02860-2.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
3

Warren, Mark. Deliberative democracy. México, D.F: FLACSO, Sede Académica de México, 1999.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
4

Chappell, Zsuzsanna. Deliberative Democracy. London: Macmillan Education UK, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-26544-9.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
5

Parkinson, John y Jane Mansbridge, eds. Deliberative Systems. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139178914.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
6

editor, Palanithurai G. y Gandhigram Rural Institute. Department of Political Science and Development Administration, eds. Deliberative democracy. Chennai: MJP Publishers, 2015.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
7

Deliberative freedom: Deliberative democracy as critical threory. Albany: State University of New York Press, 2008.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
8

Deliberative systems: Deliberative democracy at the large scale. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2012.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
9

Why deliberative democracy? Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press, 2004.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
10

Fishkin, James S. y Peter Laslett, eds. Debating Deliberative Democracy. Oxford, UK: Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/9780470690734.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
11

Schweitzer, Eva Johanna. Deliberative Polling®. Wiesbaden: Deutscher Universitätsverlag, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-322-81339-8.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
12

Ehling, Ulrike. Deliberative Global Governance. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-13826-4.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
13

Warren, Mark E. y Hilary Pearse, eds. Designing Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9780511491177.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
14

L, Marty Debian, ed. Dialogue & deliberation. Long Grove, Ill: Waveland Press, 2013.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
15

Carr, Mark F. Passionate Deliberation. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-010-0591-3.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
16

Maffettone, Sebastiano y Giancarlo Bosetti. Democrazia deliberativa, cosa è. Roma: LUISS University Press, 2004.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
17

Curato, Nicole, Marit Hammond y John B. Min. Power in Deliberative Democracy. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-95534-6.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
18

Kloß, Andrea. Deliberative Offenheit durch Empathie. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-32435-3.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
19

Deliberative democracy in practice. Vancouver: UBC Press, 2010.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
20

He, Baogang, Michael G. Breen y James S. Fishkin. Deliberative Democracy in Asia. London: Routledge, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003102441.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
21

Democracy and deliberation. Kenwyn: Juta & Co., 1999.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
22

Deliberativ politikk: Demokrati i teori og praksis. [Oslo]: Tano, 1995.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
23

Tanasoca, Ana. Deliberation Naturalized. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198851479.001.0001.

Texto completo
Resumen
Democratic theory’s deliberative turn has hit a dead end. It is unable to find a good way to scale up its small-scale, formally organized deliberative mini-publics to include the entire community. Some turn to deliberative systems for a way out, but none have found a credible way to deliberatively involve the citizenry at large. Deliberation Naturalized offers an alternative way out—one we have been using all along. The key sites of democratic deliberation are everyday political conversations among people networked across the community. Informal networked deliberation is how all citizens deliberate together, directly or indirectly. That is how public opinion emerges in civil society. Networked deliberation satisfies the classic deliberative desiderata of inclusion, equality, and reciprocity reasonably well, albeit differently than standard mini-publics. Reconceptualizing democratic deliberation in this way highlights some real threats to the networked mode of deliberative democracy, such as polarization, message repetition, and pluralistic ignorance. Deliberation Naturalized assesses the extent of each of those threats and proposes ways of protecting real existing deliberative democracy against them. By focusing on the mechanisms underpinning every democratic deliberation among citizens, Deliberation Naturalized offers a truly novel approach to deliberative democracy.
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
24

Deliberation Naturalized: Improving Real Existing Deliberative Democracy. Oxford University Press, 2020.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
25

van, Aaken Anne, List Christian y Luetge Christoph 1969-, eds. Deliberation and decision: Economics, constitutional theory, and deliberative democracy. Aldershot, Hants, England: Ashgate, 2004.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
26

Flügel-Martinsen, Oliver, Daniel Gaus, Tanja Hitzel-Cassagnes y Franziska Martinsen. Deliberative Kritik - Kritik der Deliberation: Festschrift für Rainer Schmalz-Bruns. Springer VS, 2014.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
27

Floridia, Antonio. From Participation to Deliberation: A Critical Genealogy of Deliberative Democracy. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Incorporated, 2021.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
28

From Paricipation to Deliberation: A Critical Genealogy of Deliberative Democracy. Rowman & Littlefield Publishers, Incorporated, 2017.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
29

Using Deliberative Techniques to Teach Financial Literacy (Deliberating Across the Curriculum). International Debate Education Association, 2008.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
30

Parkinson, John. Deliberating in the Real World: Problems of Legitimacy in Deliberative Democracy. Oxford University Press, USA, 2006.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
31

Fishkin, James S. Reimagining Democratic Possibilities. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198820291.003.0004.

Texto completo
Resumen
Consider four main arguments against applications of deliberative democracy—domination by the more advantaged, polarization, lack of citizen competence, and the gap between mini-publics and the broader society. We consider why these problems seem intractable according to the political theory literature. Drawing on the case studies in Part III, we show that these challenges can be overcome. Thought experiments for deliberation are considered, drawing on work from John Rawls and Jürgen Habermas. The argument for applied deliberative democracy, as in Deliberative Polling, is developed. “Deliberative systems,” where deliberation enters a democratic decision process at one point or another, are discussed. Topics include reform of the US presidential selection process, commissions within specific issue domains such as the Texas utility experience, the Japanese use of Deliberative Polling, and the use of Deliberation Day. The issue of constitutional change is also discussed, drawing on the recent Deliberative Poll in Mongolia.
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
32

Deliberation and Decision: Economics, Constitutional Theory and Deliberative Democracy (Law, Ethics and Economics). Ashgate Publishing, 2004.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
33

Landwehr, Claudia. Depoliticization, Repoliticization, and Deliberative Systems. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198748977.003.0003.

Texto completo
Resumen
Deliberative democracy is increasingly criticized as inherently elitist and technocratic, and it is blamed not only for the rise of depoliticized institutions, but also for the rise of anti-political and even populist attitudes in citizens. The chapter analyses the discussion about the depoliticizing implications and effects of deliberation and argues that, contrary to these critics, deliberation must be viewed as a genuinely political mode of interaction. A systemic perspective on deliberation allows us to critically assess the deliberative and democratic qualities of political systems and to see when and where they fail to deliver on their promises. Applied with critical intentions, the deliberative system perspective can be used to identify depoliticized policy areas and undemocratic decision-making processes. Moreover, it can feed into processes of meta-deliberation that allow for a democratization of institutional design.
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
34

Callard, Agnes. Akrasia. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190639488.003.0005.

Texto completo
Resumen
The standard analysis of weak-willed (akratic) action is that the agent acts on a reason she acknowledges as weaker than another she could have acted on. I argue that it does not make sense to think that the akratic “adds up” all her reasons and then opts to act on the weaker set. Instead, we must conclude that the akratic is unable to add up the relevant considerations, because she is intrinsically conflicted. Intrinsically conflicted agents inhabit two evaluative perspectives at the same time, but only one of them—the dominant perspective—governs their deliberative activity. The akratic acts against her deliberation, because she is motivated by the subordinate evaluative perspective from which she does not deliberate. She acts on reasons her reasoning failed to take into account. Akrasia occurs because agents sometimes need to make use of—deliberate from—values they don’t (fully) have.
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
35

Bächtiger, André y John Parkinson. Mapping and Measuring Deliberation. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199672196.001.0001.

Texto completo
Resumen
Deliberative democracy has challenged two widely accepted nostrums about democratic politics: that people lack the capacities for effective self-government; and that democratic procedures are arbitrary and do not reflect popular will; indeed, that the idea of popular will is itself illusory. On the contrary, deliberative democrats have shown that people are capable of being sophisticated, creative problem solvers, given the right opportunities in the right kinds of democratic institutions. But deliberative empirical research has its own problems. In this book two leading deliberative scholars review decades of that research and reveal three important issues. First, the concept ‘deliberation’ has been inflated so much as to lose empirical bite; second, deliberation has been equated with entire processes of which it is just one feature; and third, such processes are confused with democracy in a deliberative mode more generally. In other words, studies frequently apply micro-level tools and concepts to make macro- and meso-level judgements, and vice versa. Instead, Bächtiger and Parkinson argue that deliberation must be understood as contingent, performative, and distributed. They argue that deliberation needs to be disentangled from other communicative modes; that appropriate tools need to be deployed at the right level of analysis; and that scholars need to be clear about whether they are making additive judgements or summative ones. They then apply that understanding to set out a new agenda and new empirical tools for deliberative empirical scholarship at the micro, meso, and macro levels.
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
36

Levy, Ron, Ian O'Flynn y Hoi L. Kong. Deliberative Peace Referendums. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198867036.001.0001.

Texto completo
Resumen
‘Peace referendums’, which seek to manage armed conflict, are increasingly common around the world. Yet such referendums remain erratic forces—liable as often to aggravate as to resolve tensions. In this book we consider when, despite their risks, referendums can play useful roles amid conflict. We argue that this largely depends on a referendum’s design, including how well it incorporates contemporary lessons from the theory and practice of deliberative democracy. Deliberative democracy seeks to channel disagreement into reasoned forms of decision-making—for instance, by identifying certain ‘public’ values around which disparate groups may find a measure of common ground. As yet, however, few deliberative democracy scholars have advanced arguments for referendums in conflict societies. This is unsurprising: while designing a referendum to be deliberative is a challenge even in the most peaceable of societies, in a conflict society it is harder still. Nevertheless, discounting deliberative institutional schemes because deliberation appears too difficult, and a society too conflictual, overlooks the possibility that some armed conflict can be traced to scarce opportunities to deliberate in the first place. Using a distinctive combination of deliberative democratic and constitutional theory, and also drawing from the field of conflict studies, we develop what we call the Deliberative Peace Referendum—a referendum held under conditions of conflict and designed to be deliberative. This kind of referendum has two broad objectives: to assist a peace settlement to be achieved, and to secure the settlement’s long-term resilience. After scaffolding a tenuous agreement, the referendum may help to concretize an agreement as a durable constitutional settlement by drawing on deliberative democracy’s perceived legitimacy. A Deliberative Peace Referendum thus takes aim at the standard pathologies of referendums—pathologies that must be addressed if referendums are to avoid repeating the problems of peace referendums in the past. Our purpose with this book is to rescue peace referendums from their habitual under-theorization and poor design, and to rehabilitate them as genuine tools of conflict management.
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
37

Legitimacy of Citizen-led Deliberative Democracy: Bridging the Gap Between Mini-Publics and Macro Deliberation. Taylor & Francis Group, 2018.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
38

1940-, Elster Jon, ed. Deliberative democracy. Cambridge, U.K: Cambridge University Press, 1998.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
39

Deliberative Democracy. Taylor & Francis Group, 2018.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
40

Bohman, James y William Rehg, eds. Deliberative Democracy. The MIT Press, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/2324.001.0001.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
41

Ottmann, Henning y Pavo Barisic, eds. Deliberative Demokratie. Nomos, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.5771/9783845257440.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
42

Elster, Jon, ed. Deliberative Democracy. Cambridge University Press, 1998. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/cbo9781139175005.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
43

Lyon, Arabella. Deliberative Acts. Penn State University Press, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9780271062228.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
44

Bächtiger, Andre, John S. Dryzek, Jane Mansbridge y Mark Warren, eds. The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198747369.001.0001.

Texto completo
Resumen
Deliberative democracy has been the main game in contemporary political theory for two decades and has grown enormously in size and importance in political science and many other disciplines, and in political practice. The Oxford Handbook of Deliberative Democracy takes stock of deliberative democracy as a research field, as well as exploring and creating links with multiple disciplines and policy practice around the globe. It provides a concise history of deliberative ideals in political thought while also discussing their philosophical origins. It locates deliberation in a political system with different spaces, publics, and venues, including parliament and courts but also governance networks, protests, mini-publics, old and new media, and everyday talk. It documents the intersections of deliberative ideals with contemporary political theory, involving epistemology, representation, constitutionalism, justice, and multiculturalism. It explores the intersections of deliberative democracy with major research fields in the social sciences and law, including social and rational choice theory, communications, psychology, sociology, international relations, framing approaches, policy analysis, planning, democratization, and methodology. It engages with practical applications, mapping deliberation as a reform movement and as a device for conflict resolution. It documents the practice and study of deliberative democracy around the world, in Asia, Latin America, Africa, Europe, and global governance. And it provides reflections on the field by pioneering thinkers.
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
45

Gastil, John, Katherine R. Knobloch y Jason Gilmore. The Internal Dynamics and Political Power of Small Group Political Deliberation. Editado por Kate Kenski y Kathleen Hall Jamieson. Oxford University Press, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780199793471.013.023.

Texto completo
Resumen
The authors essay summarize the implications of public deliberation scholarship for the study of political communication as it occurs in small social bodies, from dyadic conversations and small groups to structured deliberative bodies, such as Citizens’ Assemblies. They begin by illustrating the growth, impact, and importance of this relatively new area of study in political communication. The heart of the essay contains a review of the findings of key studies relevant to, influenced by, or designed to advance deliberative theories of group behavior. The third section emphasizes one particular subarea of importance in this body of work—the potential power of connecting small group deliberation with large-scale public judgment. In the final section, the authors identify some of the key unanswered questions about group deliberation.
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
46

Deliberative Freedom Deliberative Democracy As Critical Theory. State University of New York Press, 2009.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
47

Boniolo, Giovanni. The Art of Deliberating: Democracy, Deliberation and the Life Sciences between History and Theory. Springer, 2014.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
48

Boniolo, Giovanni. The Art of Deliberating: Democracy, Deliberation and the Life Sciences between History and Theory. Springer, 2012.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
49

The Art of Deliberating: Democracy, Deliberation and the Life Sciences between History and Theory. Springer, 2012.

Buscar texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
50

Talisse, Robert B. Deliberation. Oxford University Press, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780195376692.013.0011.

Texto completo
Los estilos APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
También puede estar interesado en las bibliografías sobre el tema "Deliberativ" para otros tipos de fuentes:
Artículos de revistas Tesis
Ofrecemos descuentos en todos los planes premium para autores cuyas obras están incluidas en selecciones literarias temáticas. ¡Contáctenos para obtener un código promocional único!

Pasar a la bibliografía