Literatura académica sobre el tema "Gauge equivalence"

The supersymmetric extensions of anti-symmetric tensor gauge theories and their associated tensor gauge symmetry transformations are constructed. The classical equivalence between such supersymmetric tensor gauge theories and supersymmetric non-linear sigma models is established. The global symmetry of the supersymmetric tensor gauge theory is gauged and the locally invariant action is obtained. The supercurrent on the Kähler manifold is found in terms of the supersymmetric tensor gauge field.

We shall show that although Palatini [Formula: see text]-theories are equivalent to Brans–Dicke theories, still the first pass the Mercury precession of perihelia test, while the second do not. We argue that the two models are not physically equivalent due to different assumptions about free fall. We shall also go through perihelia test without fixing a conformal gauge (clocks or rulers) in order to highlight what can be measured in a conformal invariant way and what cannot. We shall argue that the conformal gauge is broken by choosing a definition of clock, rulers or, equivalently, of masses.

We consider the BRST formalism for the bosonic string in arbitrary gauges, both from the Hamiltonian and from the Lagrangian point of view. In the Hamiltonian formulation we construct the BRST charge Q(H) following the Batalin-Fradkin-Fradkina-Vilkovisky (BFFV) formalism in phase space. In the Lagrangian formalism, we use the Noether procedure to construct the BRST charge Q(L) in configuration space. We then discuss how to go from configuration to phase space and demonstrate that the dependence of Q(L) on the gauge fixing disappears and that both charges become equal. We work through two gauges in detail: the conformal gauge and the de Donder (harmonic) gauge. In the conformal gauge one must use equations of motion, and a simple canonical transformation is found which exhibits the equivalence. In the de Donder gauge, nontrivial canonical transformations are needed. Our results overlap with work by Beaulieu, Siegel and Zwiebach on the de Donder gauge, but since we only require BRST invariance and not anti-BRST invariance, we need simpler field redefinitions; moreover, we stay off-shell.