Literatura académica sobre el tema "Lateral Bracing System"

Bracing is a highly efficient and economical method of resisting of lateral forces in a steel structure. The most common types of bracing are those that form a fully triangulated vertical truss. These include the concentric and eccentric braced types. In high-rise buildings, the location and number of bracings is an important limitation to the architectural plan. A similar scheme has been used in larger scale spanning multiple stories and bays in tall buildings which is called large-scale bracing system. Large-scale bracing (LSB) is a particular form of a space truss. It consists of multiple diagonal elements that form a diagonal grid on the face of the structure. In this paper, a 20 story steel frame with different arrangement of bracing systems is analyzed. Linear and static nonlinear (push-over) analyses are carried out and the results presented here. Analytical results show that, the large-scale bracing is more adequate system under the lateral loads. Using LSB in tall buildings, decreases the lateral displacement, drift ratio, uplift forces in foundation and increases the ductility and shear absorption percent of the bracing system. Moreover, the stress ratios in the structural members of LSB system are less than the relevant values in other bracing systems.

We describe a novel technique for restoration of reinforced concrete (RC) structures that have sustained damage during an earthquake. The reinforcement scheme described here is a hybrid seismic retrofitting technique that combines noncompression X-bracing using CF with externally bonded GF sheets to strengthen RC structures that have sustained damage following an earthquake. The GF sheet is used to improve the ductility of columns, and the noncompression CF X-bracing system, which consists of CF bracing and anchors to replace the conventional steel bracing and bolt connections, is used to increase the lateral strength of the framing system. We report seismic restoration capacity, which enables reuse of the damaged RC frames via the hybrid CF X-bracing and GF sheet wrapping system. Cyclic loading tests were carried out to investigate hysteresis of the lateral load-drift relations, as well as the ductility. The GF sheet significantly improved the ductility of columns, resulting in a change in failure mode. The strengthening effect of conventional CF sheets used in columns is not sufficient with respect to lateral strength and stiffness. However, this study results in a significant increase in the strength of the structure due to the use of CF X-bracing and inhibited buckling failure of the bracing. This result can be exploited to develop guidelines for the application of the reinforcement system to restore damaged RC structures.

Abstract RC shear walls have been widely used as the main lateral-load resisting system in medium and high-rise buildings because of their inherent large lateral stiffness and load resistance. But, in general, the energy dissipating capacity of RC shear walls is not very good and it has been found that using the bracing system gives good results. The main purpose of this paper is to study the effect of different types of bracing on the lateral load capacity of the frame. Also, the research contains a comparison between the braced and infilled frames to decide on the best system. The research scheme consists of four frames; the bare frame, two frames the first of which was braced with concrete, the second was braced with steel bracing and the fourth frame was infilled with solid cement bricks. All the specimens were tested under cyclic loading. The results gave some important conclusions; braced and infilled bare frames increased the lateral strength of the bare frame depending on the type of bracing and infill. Also, the different types of bracing and the infill increased the initial stiffness of the bare frame by a reasonable value. The energy dissipation for the braced and infilled frames is always higher than that for the bare frame up to failure. Also, numerical modeling was carried out with the nonlinear software platform (IDARC). The numerical results obtained with the calibrated nonlinear model are presented and compared with the experimental results. Good agreement was achieved between the numerical simulation and the test results.

Steel structures, like other types of structures, are exposed to different types of loads, including lateral loads such as earthquake and wind. To resist such loading, lateral stiffness has a significant role. In this paper, the elastic stiffness factor (K) for different models of steel structure with various bracing systems and different parameters are compared. The comparison has been performed by analysing and studying the formation of plastic hinges applying the pushover analysis. The results illustrate that the increase in the number of stories reduces the K value, while the increase of span length increases it. Besides, the usage of the bracing system significantly increases the K value.

The EBF structural system is identified by the use of bracing and link beams as components that work to receive lateral seismic loads. The position of the link beam makes the EBF system have several choices of bracing configuration; D-Braces, Split K-Braces, V-Braces, Split K & Inverted Split K-Braces, Inverted Y-Braces. Structural analysis was carried out on a 10-story building model for the EBF system with different type of bracing configurations using the ETABS software. All models analyzed according to Indonesian Code (SNI 1729:2015 and SNI 1726:2019) to obtain the structural element. Seismic analysis uses the response spectrum analysis method to obtain the structural response parameters in the EBF system. Result of the analysis for all of bracing configuration are shown that Split K-Braces model has the best response parameters when compared to the MRF system. The lowest value for the parameter is owned by Inverted Y-Braces, although overall it is still larger than the MRF system. The bracing configuration greatly affects the response of EBF system due to the behavior that occurs in the link beam, therefore the selection for type of bracing configuration is also important in the EBF system structure design.

The mega structure has been widely studied and applied due to the clear force transferring way, good structural integrity and flexible layout of diverse building functions. Based on the structure of mega truss or mega frame, the research and application of the mega structure with many kinds of bracing structures become a hot topic in recent years. Mega steel frame-prestressed composite bracing structure with a rigid-flexible composite bracing system composed of rigid Λ-shape steel brace and inverted Λ-shape flexible cable is a new kind of mega structure and this composite bracing system is set up in the mega steel frame. By establishing the three-dimensional finite element model and considering the material and geometric nonlinearity, the structural performance under static load in whole process was analyzed and the energy dissipation as well as failure mode under earthquake is also investigated for this new system in this paper. The results indicate that the lateral deformation is mainly decided by horizontal load and the corresponding curve of lateral displacement has the characteristic of flexure mode as a whole, whereas the deflection of mega beam is mainly governed by vertical load and pretension of cables. The internal force equilibrium of composite brace is decided by vertical load and the degree of force unbalance is about 15% when the fluctuation of vertical load is 20%, but the change of anti-symmetric horizontal load has no effect on the internal force equilibrium. The composite braces not only help the mega beam to bear the vertical load but also greatly enhance the lateral stiffness of main structure and so the lateral stiffness of whole system is relatively uniform. Due to the TMD effects of substructure and additional dampers, the seismic energy is mainly dissipated by dampers and substructure and then the main structure is able to maintain elastic. The desired failure mode of MFPCBS under lateral loads is as follows: the web members of mega beam appear to yield at first, and then the braces between mega column limbs, Λ-shape rigid bracing truss, floor beams between mega column limbs and mega column limbs in order.

A special type of cable bracing system comprising a pre-stressed cable and a drum interacting via frictional contact is proposed for lateral resistance of structures, and an analytical solution for the response of this system is developed. The response of the system is highly non-linear due to the existence of frictional contact as well as geometrical effects and it consists of two phases: a linear phase before gross slipping with a relatively high stiffness followed by a non-linear phase with gradually increasing stiffness (i.e. hardening). However, the analytical solution is capable of capturing the whole response with a remarkable accuracy when compared to the finite element model of the system constructed for cross-validation. This analytical solution facilitates studying the effects of various parameters on the behaviour of the system, namely, the coefficient of friction, pre-strain and geometrical aspect ratio. These parameters can be arbitrarily set to achieve a desirable behaviour of the system. The proposed system is capable of undergoing large deformations with symmetrical and stable hysteretic behaviour. The effectiveness of the proposed device in reducing the seismic responses of a building frame is examined using a simplified numerical model.

Mega steel frame-prestressed composite bracing structure is a new kind of mega structure with a rigid-flexible composite bracing system composed of rigid Λ-shape steel brace and inverted Λ-shape flexible cable set up in the mega steel frame. By establishing the three-dimensional finite element model and considering the material and geometric nonlinearity, this paper analyzed the structural performance under whole process of static loading. The results indicate that the lateral deformation is mainly determined by horizontal load and the corresponding lateral deformation curve is bending type on the whole, whereas the deflection of mega beam is mainly governed by vertical load and pretension of cables.

Light-frame shearwall assemblies have been successfully used to resist gravity and lateral loads, such as earthquake and wind, for many decades. However, there is a need for maintaining the structural integrity of such buildings even when large openings in walls are introduced. Wood portal frame systems have been identified as a potential alternative to meet some aspects of this construction demand. The overarching goal of the research is to develop wood portal frame bracing systems, which can be used as an alternative or in combination with light-frame wood shearwalls. This is done through investigating the behavior of wood portal frames using the MIDPLY shearwall framing technique. A total of 21 MIDPLY corner joint tests were conducted with varying bracing details. Also, a finite element model was developed and compared with test results from the current study as well as studies by others. It was concluded from the corner joint tests that the maximum moment resistance increased with the addition of metal straps or exterior sheathings. The test results also showed a significant increase in the moment capacity and rotational stiffness by replacing the Spruce-Pine Fir (SPF), header with the Laminated Veneer Lumber (LVL) header. The addition of the FRP to the standard wall configuration also resulted in a significant increase in the moment capacity. However, no significant effect was observed on the stiffness properties of the corner joint. The FE model was capable of predicting the behavior of the corner joints and the full-scale portal frames with realistic end-conditions. The model closely predicted the ultimate lateral capacity for all the configurations but more uncertainty was found in predicting the initial stiffness.The FE model used to estimate the behavior of the full-scale portal frames constructed using the MIDPLY framing techniques showed a significant increase in the lateral load carrying capacity when compared with the traditional portal frame. It was also predicted using the full-scale FE model that the lateral load carrying capacity of the MIDPLY portal frame would increase with the addition of the metal straps on exterior faces. A parametric study showed that using a Laminated Strand Lumber (LSL) header increased the lateral load carrying capacity and the initial stiffness of the frames relative to the SPF header. The study also showed that there was an increase in the capacity if high strength metal straps were used. Doubling of the nail spacing at header and braced wall segment had a considerable effect on the lateral capacity of portal frame. Also, the initial stiffness was reduced for all the configurations with the doubling of the nail spacing at the header and braced wall segment in comparison with the reference frame.

The main goal of CIC-BREL project (Cracked and Inelastic Calculation of BRacing Elements) is to develop an analytical method to distribute horizontal forces on bracing elements, in this case reinforced masonry shear walls, of a building considering the cracked and inelastic state of material. The moment curvature curve of the wall section is created first depending on the section geometry and material properties of both the masonry units and steel reinforcement. This curve will start with an elastic material behavior, then continue in inelastic material behavior where the masonry crushes and the steel start to yield, until the maximum bending moment M_p is reached. Due to reinforced masonry wall ductility, post maximum capacity is also considered assuming a maximum curvature of 0.1%. From the moment curvature curve, the force displacement curve could be extracted depending on the wall height and wall boundary conditions. Matrix formulation has been developed for both elastic and damaged stiffness matrix, considering different boundary conditions. Fixed-fixed boundary condition which usually exists at the middle stories or last story with strong top diaphragm, fixed-pinned which is the case of the last story that has a relatively soft top diaphragm, and pinned-fixed in the first story case. Other boundary conditions could be considered depending on the degree of fixation on the wall both ends at the top and the bottom. The matrix formulation combined with the force-displacement curve which considers different material stages (elastic, inelastic, ductile post peak force) is used to define forces in each bracing element even after elastic behavior. After elastic phase of each wall the stiffness of the element will degrade leading to a less portion of the total lateral force; other elastic walls, i.e., stronger walls, will receive more portion of the total force leading to a redistribution of the total force. This process will be iterated until the total force is distributed on each bracing element depending on the wall section state: elastic, inelastic and ductile post-peak capacity. Flowcharts clearly will show this process. Finally, a Fortran code is developed to show examples using this method. The developed analytical method will be verified by the results of shake table tests held at the University of California in San Diego, USA. Last test performed in the year 2018 uses T-section reinforced masonry walls, subjected to shakings with increased intensity. The total applied force for each shaking could be defined depending on the structural weight and shaking intensity (acceleration). The damage and displacement at each intensity has been recorded and evaluated. Depending on these test results, the results of the analytically developed method will be compared and evaluated. Total system displacement at different lateral load values has been compared for analytical calculations and shake table tests; furthermore, each wall state at increased load has been compared, good agreement could be noticed.:Acknowledgement 5 1. Introduction 7 1.1. State of the Art 9 1.2. Elastic Formulae 9 1.3. Example, Elastic Calculation 12 1.3.1. Stiffnesses of the System 13 1.3.2. Torsion due to Eccentric Lateral Loading 14 1.3.3. Distribution of the Lateral Load on Wall “j” and Floor “i” 15 2. Force Displacement Curve of RM Shear Wall 19 2.1. Introduction 19 2.2. Cantilever Wall 19 2.2.1. Cantilever Elastic Wall 19 2.2.2. Cantilever Inelastic Wall 21 2.2.3. Cantilever Post-Peak Wall 22 2.3. Fixed-Fixed Wall 23 2.3.1. Fixed-Fixed Elastic Wall 23 2.3.2. Fixed-Fixed Inelastic Wall 24 2.3.3. Fixed-Fixed Post-Peak Wall 26 2.4. Moment – Curvature Analysis 26 2.5. Example, Rectangle Cross Section, Cantilever 29 a) Moment Curvature Curve 29 b) Force Displacement Curve 32 2.6. Example, Rectangle Cross Section, Fixed-Fixed 33 a) Moment Curvature Curve 33 b) Force Displacement Curve 33 2.7. Example, T Cross Section, Cantilever 35 a) Moment Curvature Curve 35 b) Force Displacement Curve 41 2.8. Example, T Cross Section, Fixed-Fixed 43 a) Moment Curvature Curve 43 b) Force Displacement Curve 43 3. Matrix Formulation 47 3.1. Procedure 47 3.2. Structure Discretization 47 3.3. Element, i.e.; Wall, Local Stiffness Matrix 48 3.4. Stiffness Matrix of Fixed-Pinned Beam 52 3.4.1. Elastic 52 3.4.2. Pre-Peak Inelastic 54 3.4.3. Post-Peak Inelastic 55 3.4.4. Normal Force Part in the Stiffness Matrix 56 3.5. Stiffness Matrix of Pinned-Fixed Beam 57 3.5.1. Elastic 57 3.5.2. Post-Peak Inelastic 57 3.6. Stiffness Matrix of Fixed-Fixed Beam 58 3.6.1. Elastic 58 3.6.2. Post-Peak Inelastic 60 3.7. Summary of Stiffness Matrices 61 3.7.1. Fixed-Fixed 61 3.7.2. Fixed-Pinned 62 3.7.3. Pinned-Fixed 63 3.8. Transformation Matrix 63 3.9. Assemble the Structure Stiffness Matrix 65 3.10. Assemble the Structure Nodal Vector 66 3.11. Solve, Get Nodal Displacements and Forces 66 4. Matrix Formulation and Deformation Based Method 69 4.1. Elastic Method in Distributing Lateral Force 69 4.2. Elastic and Inelastic Method in Distributing Lateral Force 70 5. Shake Table Tests 73 5.1. Introduction 73 5.2. Design of Test Structure 73 5.3. Material Properties 75 5.4. Tests and Observations 75 5.4.1. Tests up to Mul-90% 76 5.4.2. Tests with Mul-120% 76 5.4.3. Tests with Mul-133% 76 5.5. Deformations 77 6. Verification 81 6.1. T Cross Section, Dimensions, Reinforcement and Materials 81 6.2. Moment Curvature Curve 82 6.3. Force Displacement Curve 85 6.4. Force Displacement Curve of the Structure 88 7. Conclusions and Suggestions 91 8. References 93 Appendix 1, Timoshenko Beam 95 • Fixed-Fixed 95 • Fixed-Pinned 95 • Pinned-Fixed 96 Appendix 2, Bernoulli Beam 97 • Fixed-Fixed 97 • Fixed-Pinned 97 • Pinned-Fixed 98

One of the major challenges of engineering is finding the proper balance between economical and safe. Currently engineers at Nucor Corporation have ignored the additional lateral bracing provided by standing seam roofing systems to joists because of the lack of methods available to quantify the amount of bracing provided. Based on the results of testing performed herein, this bracing is significant, potentially resulting in excessively conservative designs and unnecessary costs. This project performed 26 tests with Vulcraft joists in a pressure box to investigate the effects of how many variables influence the lateral bracing provided to joists from standing seam roofing systems, including the variables joist length, panel gauge, clip height, thermal block presence, insulation thickness, and top chord size. Two methods were developed to account for this additional bracing: finite element computer modeling and an application of the Rayleigh-Ritz method called the Column-on-Elastic-Foundation Method. Variables influencing the pressure at failure, namely chord size and deck gauge, were those with the greatest effect on additional lateral bracing provided from standing seam roof systems. It was determined that higher roof stiffness values and higher failure pressures yield shorter effective lengths.

Z-sections are widely used as secondary members in metal building roof systems. Lateral restraints are required to maintain the stability of a Z-section roof system and provide resistance to the lateral forces generated by the slope of the roof and the effects due to the rotation of the principal axes of the Z-section relative to the plane of the roof sheathing. The behavior of Z-sections in roof systems is complex as they act in conjunction with the roof sheathing as a system and as a light gage cold formed member, is subject to local cross section deformations. The goal of this research program was to provide a means of predicting lateral restraint forces in Z-section supported roof systems. The research program began with laboratory tests to measure lateral restraint forces in single and multiple span sloped roof systems. A description of the test apparatus and procedure as well as the results of the 40 tests performed is provided in Appendix II. To better understand the need for lateral restraints and to provide a means of testing different variables of the roof system, two types of finite element models were developed and are discussed in detail in appended Paper I. The first finite element model is simplified model that uses frame stiffness elements to represent the purlin and sheathing. This model has been used extensively by previous researchers and modifications were made to improve correlation with test results. The second model is more rigorous and uses shell finite elements to represent the Z-section and sheathing. The shell finite element model was used to develop a calculation procedure referred to as the Component Stiffness Method for predicting the lateral restraint forces in Z-section roof systems. The method uses flexural and torsional mechanics to describe the behavior of the Z-section subject to uniform gravity loads. The forces generated by the system of Z-sections are resisted by the "components" of the system: the lateral restraints, the sheathing and Z-section-to-rafter connection. The mechanics of purlin behavior providing the basis for this method are discussed in appended Paper II. The development of the method and the application of the method to supports restraints and interior restraints are provided in appended papers III, IV and V.
Ph. D.

Das seitliche Kraftwiderstandssystem, in diesem Fall Stahlbetonkernwände eines 10-stöckigen Gebäudes, das aus Schwerkraftstützen und Scherwänden besteht, wurde linear (unter der Annahme eines linearen elastischen Materialverhaltens von Beton) und nichtlinear gerissen (unter Berücksichtigung des Materialverhaltens von Beton) unter seismische Belastung analysiert. Erst wurde die grundlegenden Methode der äquivalenten Seitenkraft zur Schätzung der seismischen Belastungen benutzt, später wurde die aktuelle Methode The Performance Based Seismic Design verwendet, bei der reale seismische Aufzeichnungen verwendet werden und die Beschleunigungen mithilfe der Software ETABS auf das Gebäude angewendet werden. Nach dem Anwenden der Beschleunigungen wurden die maximal resultierenden Kräfte und Verformungen bewertet. Das Gebäude wurde dann für die maximal resultierenden Kräfte ausgelegt.Der Inhalt des Hauptberichts ist: - Allgemeine Beschreibung des Gebäudes, seismische Standortinformationen, Standortantwortspektren, Belastung und seismische Kräfte einschließlich Analyse des modalen Antwortspektrums. - Lineares Design des Modells für Schwerkraft und seismische Belastungen, P-M-Wechselwirkungsdiagramme für den U-Querschnitt aus Stahlbeton, Entwurf einer Längs- und Schubbewehrung der Scherwände und des Koppelbalkens. - Zwei Varianten des nichtlinearen Modells, bei denen die Kernwand (Scherwände) gemäß jeder Variante entworfen wird, wobei der Einfluss des Dämpfungsmodells auf das nichtlineare dynamische Verhalten sowie der Einfluss des Kopplungsstrahlmodells auf das nichtlineare dynamische Verhalten untersucht werden. - Entwurfsüberprüfung, erst mit der Definition der Leistungsobjekte und Modell für die Zeitverlaufsanalyse. Es wurden zwei Leistungsziele untersucht: Vollbetriebs- und Lebenssicherheitsprüfungen. - In zwei Fällen wurde eine zusätzliche Studie zur Reaktion von nicht strukturellen Elementen aufgrund seismischer Belastung durchgeführt: Überprüfung des Vollbetriebs und der Lebenssicherheit. - Die Durchsetzungszeichnungen wurden fertiggestellt und dem Bericht beigefügt. Schlussfolgerung und Empfehlungen waren am Ende des Berichts. Dies ist wichtig für die Gesellschaft, da die verwendete Methode für die seismische Planung jedes Gebäudes verwendet werden kann. Es könnte ein Holzbau oder ein Mauerwerk sein. Die Gestaltung eines Mauerwerksgehäuses wird Gegenstand eines zukünftigen Forschungsprojekts sein. Allgemeine Ziele: Lineare und nichtlineare seismische Bemessung von Stahlbetongebäuden unter Verwendung der 'seismischen Bemessung der Leistungsgrundlagen:Acknowledgement 4 PART I: General Information, Site and Loading 5 1. General Information About the Building 5 1.1. Specified Material Properties: 6 1.2. Site Information: 6 1.3. Geometry (Figure I.1): 7 2. Site Seismicity and Design Coefficients 7 2.1. USGS Results 7 2.2. Site Response Spectra 8 2.3. Design Coefficients And Factors For Seismic Force-Resisting Systems 8 3. Loading 9 3.1. Determination Of Seismic Forces 9 3.2. Modal Response Spectrum Analysis 9 3.3. Seismic Load Effects And Combinations 11 PART II: Core Wall Design - Linear Model 12 4. Model of ETABS 12 4.1. Geometry 12 4.2. Gravity Loads 13 4.3. Seismic Loads 15 4.4. Tabulated Selected Results From ETABS Analysis 16 5. P-M Interaction Diagrams 17 5.1. N-S Direction 17 5.2. E-W Direction 19 6. Lateral Force Resisting System, Linear 20 6.1. Longitudinal Reinforcement 20 6.2. Shear Reinforcement 22 6.3. Boundary Elements 24 6.3.1. Transverse Reinforcement Of Boundary Elements 26 6.4. Coupling Beams 27 7. Detailing 30 PART III: Site Response Spectra and Input Ground Motions 31 8. Performance Levels 31 8.1. ASCE 7-16 Target Spectra 31 8.2. Site Response Spectra 34 8.2.1. Ground Motion Conditioning 34 8.2.2. Amplitude Scaling 37 8.2.3. Pseudo Acceleration and Displacement Response Spectra 38 PART IV: Non-Linear Model 40 9. Variant 1 of Non-Linear Model 40 9.1. Complete Core Wall Design for Combined Axial-Flexure 40 9.2. Modal Analysis 43 9.3. Influence of the Damping Model on the Nonlinear Dynamic Response 49 10. Variant 2 of Non-Linear Model 57 10.1. Influence of the Coupling Beam Model on the Nonlinear Dynamic Response 57 10.2. Estimated Roof Displacement 68 PART V: Design Verification 70 11. General 70 11.1. Performance Objectives 70 11.2. Model For Time-History Analyses 71 11.3. Performance Level Verification 71 11.4. Fully Operational Performance Level Verification 71 11.5. Life Safety Performance Level Verification 78 PART VI: Capacity Design of Force Controlled Elements and Regions and Design of Acceleration-Sensitive Nonstructural Elements 87 12. General 87 12.1. Design Verification 87 12.1.1. Full Occupancy Case 87 12.1.2. Life Safety Case 91 12.1.3. Observations on Plots 93 12.2. Acceleration response spectra at roof level 94 12.2.1. Observations on Plots 95 12.3. Core Wall 97 12.4. Design Detail Comparison 103 12.5. Detailed Drawing 103 12.6. Diaphragm 104 12.7. Fire Sprinkler System 117 12.8. Overhanging Projector 119 PART VII: Conclusion 122
Lateral Force Resisting System, in this case reinforced concrete core walls of a 10 story building consists of gravity columns and shear walls, has been analyzed in linear (assuming linear elastic material behavior of concrete) and nonlinear cracked (considering plastic material behavior of concrete) case, for seismic loading. Starting with the basic method of equivalent lateral force to estimate the seismic loads, then using the up to date method, The Performance Based Seismic Design, which uses real seismic records and apply the accelerations on the building using the software ETABS. After applying the accelerations, maximum resulted forces and deformations have been evaluated. The building then have been designed for the maximum resulted forces. The contents of the main report are: - General description of the building, site seismic information, site response spectra, loading and seismic forces including modal response spectrum analysis. - Linear design of the model for gravity and seismic loads, P-M interaction diagrams developed for U cross section from reinforced concrete, designing longitudinal and shear reinforcement of the shear walls and coupling beam. - Two variants of Nonlinear model, designing the core wall (shear walls) according to each variant, studying the influence of damping model on the nonlinear dynamic response, as well as the influence of the coupling beam model on the nonlinear dynamic response. - Design verification, starting with defining the performance objects, and model for time history analysis. Two performance objectives have been studied: Fully operational and Life safety level verifications. - Additional study was performed for the response of non-structural elements due to seismic loading in two cases: Fully operational and Life safety level verifications. - Reinforcement Drawings have been finalized and attached to the report. - Conclusion and recommendations was at the end of the report. It is important for the society, because the used method could be used for the seismic design of any building. It could be wood building or masonry building. Designing a masonry building case will be the subject of future research project. Overall objectives: Linear and Nonlinear seismic design of reinforced concrete building using the performance bases seismic design.:Acknowledgement 4 PART I: General Information, Site and Loading 5 1. General Information About the Building 5 1.1. Specified Material Properties: 6 1.2. Site Information: 6 1.3. Geometry (Figure I.1): 7 2. Site Seismicity and Design Coefficients 7 2.1. USGS Results 7 2.2. Site Response Spectra 8 2.3. Design Coefficients And Factors For Seismic Force-Resisting Systems 8 3. Loading 9 3.1. Determination Of Seismic Forces 9 3.2. Modal Response Spectrum Analysis 9 3.3. Seismic Load Effects And Combinations 11 PART II: Core Wall Design - Linear Model 12 4. Model of ETABS 12 4.1. Geometry 12 4.2. Gravity Loads 13 4.3. Seismic Loads 15 4.4. Tabulated Selected Results From ETABS Analysis 16 5. P-M Interaction Diagrams 17 5.1. N-S Direction 17 5.2. E-W Direction 19 6. Lateral Force Resisting System, Linear 20 6.1. Longitudinal Reinforcement 20 6.2. Shear Reinforcement 22 6.3. Boundary Elements 24 6.3.1. Transverse Reinforcement Of Boundary Elements 26 6.4. Coupling Beams 27 7. Detailing 30 PART III: Site Response Spectra and Input Ground Motions 31 8. Performance Levels 31 8.1. ASCE 7-16 Target Spectra 31 8.2. Site Response Spectra 34 8.2.1. Ground Motion Conditioning 34 8.2.2. Amplitude Scaling 37 8.2.3. Pseudo Acceleration and Displacement Response Spectra 38 PART IV: Non-Linear Model 40 9. Variant 1 of Non-Linear Model 40 9.1. Complete Core Wall Design for Combined Axial-Flexure 40 9.2. Modal Analysis 43 9.3. Influence of the Damping Model on the Nonlinear Dynamic Response 49 10. Variant 2 of Non-Linear Model 57 10.1. Influence of the Coupling Beam Model on the Nonlinear Dynamic Response 57 10.2. Estimated Roof Displacement 68 PART V: Design Verification 70 11. General 70 11.1. Performance Objectives 70 11.2. Model For Time-History Analyses 71 11.3. Performance Level Verification 71 11.4. Fully Operational Performance Level Verification 71 11.5. Life Safety Performance Level Verification 78 PART VI: Capacity Design of Force Controlled Elements and Regions and Design of Acceleration-Sensitive Nonstructural Elements 87 12. General 87 12.1. Design Verification 87 12.1.1. Full Occupancy Case 87 12.1.2. Life Safety Case 91 12.1.3. Observations on Plots 93 12.2. Acceleration response spectra at roof level 94 12.2.1. Observations on Plots 95 12.3. Core Wall 97 12.4. Design Detail Comparison 103 12.5. Detailed Drawing 103 12.6. Diaphragm 104 12.7. Fire Sprinkler System 117 12.8. Overhanging Projector 119 PART VII: Conclusion 122

This chapter describes major structures built from 1890 to 1897, many of which featured wind-braced frames that used steel to reduce spatially inefficient masonry walls and piers. Before the late nineteenth century, wind bracing had rarely been more than a minor consideration in structural calculations—the dead weight of brick or stone construction could absorb all but the most severe wind forces. However, the lighter weight of skeletal buildings, their increased height, and the unreliable nature of iron connections brought this issue to the fore. Chicago's tall building designers of the 1880s were among the first to recognize this problem and to solve it with dedicated lateral-resistant systems.

<p>Deterioration of the road bridge built in the high growth period has become a big problem in Japan. Half of the reasons for rebuilding steel bridges are due to corrosion and many studies have been conducted on the load carrying capacity of girders with corrosion damage. On the other hand, the bridge is composed of multiple members such as main girder, lateral bracing and sway bracing. These members do not behave independently but behave as a structural system and have high redundancy. Many previous studies have focused on the load carrying capacity of corroded members independently and few studies focused on the evaluation of the system behavior and load carrying capacity of the bridge structures. It is required to clarify the structural system behavior of the bridge for more rational bridge design and repair reinforcement. In this study, full‐scale FE analysis for most standard steel I‐girder bridge considering corrosion damage was performed, and redundancy of the bridge structural system was examined varying corrosion position, corrosion degree, and number of main girder. According to the analysis results, a healthy girder resists the external load even after a girder with corrosion reaches the maximum load capacity and was confirmed that the maximum load capacity of the bridge system is much higher than that of the corroded girder end and has high redundancy. Furthermore, the difference on load‐bearing capacity when the number of main girders is changed are clarified focusing on l collapse process.</p>

Idiopathic scoliosis is a deformity of the spine that affects 2–3% of adolescents. The treatment of scoliosis often requires the use of a rigid brace to align the spine and prevent progression of the deformation. The most common brace, referred to as the Boston brace, has a high success rate in preventing progression of the scoliotic curve. The common root failure is lack of patient compliance in wearing the brace for the prescribed time. This lack in compliance is due to patient discomfort, both physically and emotional, and the patients’ limited ability to perform activities of daily living (ADL) when wearing the brace. The likelihood of needing surgery increases dramatically when bracing is unsuccessful. We seek to improve patients’ comfort by designing a brace that improves range of motion, while remaining stiff in the corrective direction. Primary ranges of motion were acquired using a motion capture system. A kinematic analysis was performed using homogeneous transformations and screw theory to determine primary screw axes of the motions. The required lateral stiffness for the brace was found in literature. Compliant mechanisms are used because they can apply the corrective force, but also allow the patients some range of motion. The mechanism implementation was characterized using finite element analysis and compared to a physical model test. Initial findings confirm that compliant mechanisms are suitable for the application of a scoliosis brace. We have found that the proposed brace can apply the necessary forces at reasonable displacements. The proposed brace will not allow the patient a full range of motion, but we believe that it will achieve an improved range of motion that will increase a patient’s ability to perform activities of daily living.