Articles de revues : « Egg donation »

1

Black, Jennifer J. « Egg Donation ». MCN, The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing 35, n^o 3 (mai 2010) : 132–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/nmc.0b013e3181d763b9.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

2

&NA;. « Egg Donation ». MCN, The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing 35, n^o 3 (mai 2010) : 137–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/nmc.0b013e3181dd0c1c.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

3

Birdsall, Mary. « Egg Donation ». British Menopause Society Journal 2, n^o 2 (juillet 1996) : 9–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/136218079600200208.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

4

Katzorke, Thomas. « Eizellspende (egg-donation) ». Reproduktionsmedizin 16, n^o 6 (14 décembre 2000) : 373–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s004440000222.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

5

Álvarez Medina, Georgina. « High Complexity Fertilization in Cuba : Egg Donation ». Obstetrics Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences 5, n^o 3 (29 avril 2021) : 01–02. http://dx.doi.org/10.31579/2578-8965/068.

Texte intégral

Résumé :

The decades of the 70s and 80s of the last century in our country, allowed us to glimpse that the possibilities of treatment for the infertile couple were considerably expanded. Until that moment, infertile couples had very limited options such as adoption, insemination using a donor or conforming to not having children. In Cuba, since 1979, the first steps were taken in the field of assisted reproduction in animals. Human reproduction studies have been carried out at the National Institute of Endocrinology and the Ramón González Coro Gyneco-obstetric Hospital, the first birth having occurred in 1986. Since 2006 and with the aim of guaranteeing perinatological care specialized in pregnant patients as a result of in vitro fertilization, it was decided to create a consultation at the Ramón González Coro Hospital given the high rate of twin and triple pregnancies, preterm births and complications. The number of patients treated had to proceed with high complexity in vitro fertilization and sometimes ICSI and it was not until 2014 after the approval by our constitution, the family code and medical ethics that egg donation began.

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

6

Thomasma, David C. « Selling Human Egg Donation ». American Journal of Bioethics 1, n^o 4 (1 décembre 2001) : 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/152651601317139342.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

7

Cattapan, Alana Rose. « Good eggs ? Evaluating consent forms for egg donation ». Journal of Medical Ethics 42, n^o 7 (7 mars 2016) : 455–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/medethics-2015-102964.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

8

Long, Yao, et Shuangning Zhou. « Research on The Legal Path of Female Egg Donation in China under The Background of Low Fertility Rate ». Journal of Education, Humanities and Social Sciences 7 (13 janvier 2023) : 154–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.54097/ehss.v7i.4078.

Texte intégral

Résumé :

With the fertility rate declining yearly in China, egg donation has become a meaningful way to solve people's infertility and improve fertility. However, more laws and regulations on egg donation behavior norms and constraints must be more relevant. Promoting the legalization of egg donation in China and establishing a standardized national unified egg bank can help infertile parents reproduce through reproductive assistance technology and improve the national fertility level. Through literature review and summary, this paper found that there are ethical and moral risks, lack of reasonable supervision, and the egg donation platform has yet to be fully established in China. Therefore, it is necessary to establish and improve the relevant legal management system of egg banks and carry out more standardized and strict supervision and legal regulations on the specific procedures of egg donation, egg use, egg collection, and egg freezing. The public welfare of voluntary egg donation should be publicized more to reduce the possibility of commercial egg donation and egg freezing. Pay attention to the construction of egg banks, conduct data statistics, prevent the occurrence of inbreeding, protect the privacy of egg donors more comprehensively, and provide encouraging economic compensation to egg donors; Finally, the physical and mental health and safety of egg donors should be guaranteed to reduce the risk of egg donation.

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

9

Simoglou, Vassiliki. « The Pain of Egg-Donation ». Open Pain Journal 7, n^o 1 (24 novembre 2014) : 41–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.2174/1876386301407010041.

Texte intégral

Résumé :

Contemporary body practices providing an answer to the subjects’ demand for assisted reproduction procedures, question the subjective experience of pain. The psychoanalytic approach of pain introduces the dimension of the unconscious in bodily experiences. Clinical field work and psychoanalytic psychotherapy with an infertile woman after failed egg-donation in vitro fertilization cycles, allows an understanding of psychic pain as analogous to somatic pain and considers the human body as a psychosomatic entity. In this case study, pain becomes a vector of subjectivation, allowing for the subject to negotiate acceptance of a gift impossible to receive.

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

10

Abdalla, H., et J. W. Studd. « Egg donation and medical ethics. » BMJ 299, n^o 6691 (8 juillet 1989) : 120. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.299.6691.120-a.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

11

Ahuja, K. K., et E. G. Simons. « Anonymous egg donation and dignity ». Human Reproduction 11, n^o 6 (1 juin 1996) : 1151–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordjournals.humrep.a019344.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

12

Van Berkel, D., A. Candido et W. H. Pijffers. « Becoming a mother by non-anonymous egg donation : Secrecy and the relationship between egg recipient, egg donor and egg donation child ». Journal of Psychosomatic Obstetrics & ; Gynecology 28, n^o 2 (janvier 2007) : 97–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/01674820701409868.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

13

Sibai, Baha, Yossi Bart, Avi Shina, Shali Mazaki-Tovi, Irit Eisen, Israel Hendler, Micha Baum, Eyal Schiff et Michal Fishel Bartal. « The Impact of Sperm and Egg Donation on the Risk of Pregnancy Complications ». American Journal of Perinatology 36, n^o 02 (21 juillet 2018) : 205–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0038-1667029.

Texte intégral

Résumé :

Objective The aim of this study was to evaluate obstetric outcomes in relation to the extent of donor sperm exposure with and without egg donation. Materials and Methods This is a retrospective cohort study in a single tertiary care center. All women with a singleton pregnancy who conceived following sperm donation (SD) were included. Obstetrics and neonatal outcomes for pregnancies following single SD were compared with pregnancies following repeat SD from the same donor. In a secondary analysis, we compared pregnancy outcomes among three modes of assisted reproductive technology (intrauterine insemination [IUI-SD], in vitro fertilization [IVF-SD], and IVF sperm + egg donation [IVF-SD + ED]). Results A total of 706 pregnant women met the inclusion criteria, 243 (34.4%) following the first SD and 463 (65.6%) following repeat donations. Compared with repeat SDs, single donation was not associated with higher rates of preterm delivery (12.8 vs. 12.7%, respectively, p = 0.99), preeclampsia (7.0 vs. 6.9%, p = 0.999), and intrauterine growth restriction (4.1 vs. 3.9%, p = 0.88). Pregnancies following IVF-SD + ED had increased risk for preeclampsia (adjusted odds ratio [AOR], 3.1; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.5–6.6), preterm labor (AOR, 2.4; 95% CI, 1.1–5.4), and cesarean section (AOR, 2.1; 95% CI, 1.0–4.3) compared with IUI-SD and IVF-SD. Conclusion The extent of donor sperm exposure did not correlate with obstetrics complications, but double gamete donation was associated with increased risk for preeclampsia, preterm labor, and cesarean section.

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

14

Lester, David, Adrian Furnham et Natalie Salem. « Attitudes toward Egg and Sperm Donation ». Psychological Reports 106, n^o 2 (avril 2010) : 579–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.2466/pr0.106.2.579-580.

Texte intégral

Résumé :

In a sample of 124 American undergraduate students, approval of egg donation was predicted by age, sex, and Neuroticism scores ( R2 = .14), while approval of sperm donation was predicted only by age of this sample ( R2 = .07).

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

15

Vera, Danielle. « R-Egg-Ulation : A Call for Greater Regulation of the Big Business of Human Egg Harvesting ». Michigan Journal of Gender & ; Law, n^o 23.2 (2016) : 391. http://dx.doi.org/10.36641/mjgl.23.2.r-egg-ulation.

Texte intégral

Résumé :

When it comes to young healthy women “donating” their eggs, America has a regulation problem. This Note explains the science behind the harvesting of human eggs, focusing on potential egg donors, and describes the specific factors that make egg donation a unique type of transaction. It describes the current regulatory status of the assisted reproductive technology industry in the United States and highlights the ways in which this scheme fails to protect egg “donors.” This Note concludes with a call for comprehensive regulation of the assisted reproductive technology industry.

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

16

Ahuja, K. K., B. J. Mostyn et E. G. Simons. « Egg sharing and egg donation : attitudes of British egg donors and recipients ». Human Reproduction 12, n^o 12 (1 décembre 1997) : 2845–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/12.12.2845.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

17

Maggs, Frances. « Egg donation a gift of love ». Nursing Standard 13, n^o 27 (24 mars 1999) : 14–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.7748/ns.13.27.14.s33.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

18

Devroey, P. « Preparation of endometrium for egg donation ». Human Reproduction Update 4, n^o 6 (1 novembre 1998) : 856–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humupd/4.6.856.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

19

Webster, Kristen L. W. « Framing Egg Donation : A Dichotomous Split ». Health Communication 33, n^o 12 (29 août 2017) : 1445–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10410236.2017.1358242.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

20

Ahuja, KK, EG Simons, S. Nair, MR Rimington et NA Armar. « Minimizing risk in anonymous egg donation ». Reproductive BioMedicine Online 7, n^o 5 (janvier 2003) : 504–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1472-6483(10)62066-4.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

21

Lilley, Doriver. « Disclosure : a threat to egg donation ». Reproductive BioMedicine Online 7, n^o 6 (janvier 2003) : 705–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s1472-6483(10)62097-4.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

22

Martin, N. M., E. D. Blyth, R. Deery et C. Cameron. « Psychosocial Support in Known Egg Donation ». Fertility and Sterility 84 (septembre 2005) : S21—S22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2005.07.050.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

23

Leeton, J., C. King et R. Withers. « The changing pattern of egg donation ». Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 10, n^o 2 (février 1993) : 173–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf01207744.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

24

MacArthur, Taleen, Gloria Bachmann et Charletta Ayers. « Menopausal women requesting egg/embryo donation ». Menopause 23, n^o 7 (juillet 2016) : 799–802. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/gme.0000000000000622.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

25

Robertson, John A. « Compensation and egg donation for research ». Fertility and Sterility 86, n^o 6 (décembre 2006) : 1573–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2006.08.084.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

26

Lita, Ana. « Abstract of "Human Egg Markets : Ethical Questions on Egg Donation" ». Journal of Long-Term Effects of Medical Implants 18, n^o 1 (2008) : 53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1615/jlongtermeffmedimplants.v18.i1.510.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

27

Martínez-Varea, Alicia, Begoña Pellicer, Alfredo Perales-Marín et Antonio Pellicer. « Relationship between Maternal Immunological Response during Pregnancy and Onset of Preeclampsia ». Journal of Immunology Research 2014 (2014) : 1–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/210241.

Texte intégral

Résumé :

Maternofetal immune tolerance is essential to maintain pregnancy. The maternal immunological tolerance to the semiallogeneic fetus becomes greater in egg donation pregnancies with unrelated donors as the complete fetal genome is allogeneic to the mother. Instead of being rejected, the allogeneic fetus is tolerated by the pregnant woman in egg donation pregnancies. It has been reported that maternal morbidity during egg donation pregnancies is higher as compared with spontaneous orin vitrofertilization pregnancies. Particularly, egg donation pregnancies are associated with a higher incidence of pregnancy-induced hypertension and placental pathology. Preeclampsia, a pregnancy-specific disease characterized by the development of both hypertension and proteinuria, remains the leading cause of maternal and perinatal mortality and morbidity. The aim of this review is to characterize and relate the maternofetal immunological tolerance phenomenon during pregnancies with a semiallogenic fetus, which are the spontaneously conceived pregnancies andin vitrofertilization pregnancies, and those with an allogeneic fetus or egg donation pregnancies. Maternofetal immune tolerance in uncomplicated pregnancies and pathological pregnancies, such as those with preeclampsia, has also been assessed. Moreover, whether an inadequate maternal immunological response to the allogenic fetus could lead to a higher prevalence of preeclampsia in egg donation pregnancies has been addressed.

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

28

MILLS, Catherine, Elizabeth SUTTON, Julian KOPLIN, Ezra KNEEBONE, Karinne LUDLOW et Ainsley NEWSON. « Mitochondrial Donation and Egg Donor Consent in Australia ». Fertility & ; Reproduction 04, n^o 03n04 (septembre 2022) : 150. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s2661318222740620.

Texte intégral

Résumé :

Background: Legislation to permit mitochondrial donation (MD) in Australia was introduced into Federal Parliament in early 2021, and the techniques may be legalized and made available soon. MD enables women affected by disease-causing mutations in their mitochondrial DNA to have a genetically related child who is unlikely to inherit these mutations. MD relies on the donation of oocytes. Australia’s oocyte donation system does not meet current demand for oocytes and MD would add to this. Consequently, the implementation of MD would raise critical questions about the system of procuring donors and using their oocytes. The proposed model for implementing MD in Australia does not address these issues. We address two key inter-related concerns – oocyte availability and donor consent – in how best to meet current and future demand for donor oocytes. Aim: To consider ethical, social, and regulatory issues arising from the proposed implementation of MD in Australia, particularly oocyte availability and donor consent issues. Method: We discuss the current system of oocyte donation in Australia and consider likely impacts of MD on this. We review alternative systems that have been proposed to enhance the availability of oocytes, focusing on ethical aspects of these with reference to specific features of the Australian context, donor consent, and MD. Results: MD will increase demand for oocytes if introduced in Australia. Alternative procurement systems to address the shortage of oocytes may be required. Refining the system of consent used for oocyte donation may be an important feature of increasing oocyte availability for MD. Conclusion: As Australia presses ahead with the potential implementation of MD, consideration should be given as to whether the current system for oocyte donation is adequate. We conclude that it is necessary to consider alternative systems for enhancing oocyte availability in Australia, which, in some circumstances, may include changing consent procedures.

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

29

Kroløkke, Charlotte. « Have Eggs, Will Travel : The Experiences and Ethics of Global Egg Donation ». Somatechnics 5, n^o 1 (mars 2015) : 12–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/soma.2015.0145.

Texte intégral

Résumé :

Feminist scholars have critically questioned the practices and ethics of reproductive mobility. While the reproductive mobility of fertility patients has been foregrounded, little is known of egg donor mobility including the experiences of travelling internationally to donate eggs. Based on written stories and photographic material provided by forty-two egg donors, this article uses feminist cluster analysis and the concept of eggpreneurship to illustrate how global egg donors negotiate reproductive agency and choice when they travel internationally to donate their eggs. In their stories, global egg donors position egg donation through a moral economy of gifting and an affective economy of desire in which reproductive mobility is transformed from a gift to a trip of a lifetime.

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

30

Speier, Amy. « Is Information Power ? Comparing Anonymous and Open Egg Donation ». Sociological Research Online 22, n^o 2 (mai 2017) : 130–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.5153/sro.4294.

Texte intégral

Résumé :

Both the Czech Republic and the United States are destinations for cross-border reproductive travellers. For North Americans, including Canadians, who opt to travel to the Czech Republic for IVF using an egg donor, they are entering a fertility industry that is anonymous. This makes the Czech Republic different from other European countries that necessitate open gamete donation, as in Austria, Germany and the United Kingdom. For reproductive travellers coming to the United States for fertility treatment, there is a wider menu of choices regarding egg donation given the vastly unregulated nature of the industry. More recently, professionals in the industry are pushing for ‘open’ egg donation. For intended parents traveling to either location seeking in vitro fertilization using an egg donor, they must choose whether or not to pursue open or closed donation. As pre-conception parents, they navigate competing discourses of healthy parenting of donor-conceived offspring. They must be reflexive about their choices, and protective when weighing their options, always keeping their future child's mental, physical and genetic health in mind. Drawing from ethnographic data collected over the course of six years in the United States and the Czech Republic, this paper will explore both programs, paying special attention to the question of how gamete donation and global assisted reproductive technologies intersect with different notions about healthy pre-conception parenting.

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

31

Imrie, S., J. Lysons, V. Jadva, K. Shaw, J. Grimmel et S. Golombok. « Parent–child relationship quality and child psychological adjustment in families created using egg donation : children’s perspectives at age 5 years ». Human Reproduction 37, n^o 3 (20 décembre 2021) : 499–509. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/deab265.

Texte intégral

Résumé :

Abstract STUDY QUESTION What are children’s perspectives of the quality of their relationships with their parents and their own psychological well-being in families created using egg donation? SUMMARY ANSWER Children’s scores indicated good parent–child relationship quality and high levels of psychological well-being, with children in families created using egg donation rating their relationships with their mothers as higher in warmth/enjoyment than children in a comparison group of families created using IVF. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY Little is known about how children in families created through egg donation view their family relationships and their own psychological well-being. Research with 7-and-10-year-olds in anonymous egg donation families has indicated good parent–child relationship quality from children’s perspectives, but studies have not involved younger children or those conceived following identity-release egg donation. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION This study included 50 children who had been born through egg donation and a comparison group of 43 children conceived through IVF with the parents’ own gametes. Data were collected between April 2018 and December 2019. The sample forms part of a larger longitudinal study examining family functioning in families created through fertility treatment. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Children were aged 5 years old and had been born into families with different-sex couple parents. All families were visited at home. Children were administered the Berkeley Puppet Interview, a standardized assessment of parent–child relationship quality and psychological well-being. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Children in egg donation families rated their relationships with their mothers as higher in warmth and enjoyment than did children in IVF families. No differences were found between the two family types in children’s ratings of the father–child relationship, or in children’s ratings of their own psychological well-being. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION It is possible that children who did not consent to take part in the research had less positive perceptions of their family and themselves than children who participated. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS The findings are relevant to UK clinics offering identity-release egg donation, to parents who have used egg donation to create their family and to individuals and couples considering their fertility treatment options. That children in egg donation families were more similar than different to children in IVF families in their self-concept and perception of their family relationships should prove reassuring. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) This research was supported by a Wellcome Trust Collaborative Award [208013/Z/17]. The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

32

Cattapan, Alana. « Precarious labour : on egg donation as work ». Studies in Political Economy 97, n^o 3 (septembre 2016) : 234–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/07078552.2016.1249125.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

33

Capitulo, Kathleen Leask, Zhaoxia Huang et Anastasia Stekas. « Should Ovum (Human Egg) Donation Be Allowed ? » MCN, The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing 37, n^o 3 (2012) : 144–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/nmc.0b013e3182493950.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

34

Leeton, John, et Peter Rogers. « Preparation of the endometrium for egg donation ». Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics 10, n^o 7 (octobre 1993) : 459–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf01212932.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

35

Almeling, Rene. « The Business of Egg and Sperm Donation ». Contexts 16, n^o 4 (novembre 2017) : 68–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1536504217742396.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

36

Guerra, L., C. Mazzanti, V. Calabresi, N. Luca, G. Zambruno et G. Zenzo. « Pemphigoid Gestationis Complicating an Egg Donation Pregnancy ». Acta Dermato Venereologica 96, n^o 5 (2016) : 695–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.2340/00015555-2303.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

37

Ramos Vidal, J. J., C. C. Caligara, F. J. F. Carranza, A. I. A. Salazar, N. N. Prados et M. M. Fernandez-Sanchez. « Safety and efficacy in egg donation program ». Fertility and Sterility 100, n^o 3 (septembre 2013) : S325. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.fertnstert.2013.07.942.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

38

Lykkebo Petersen, Matilde. « Finding the “Appropriate Distance” in Egg Donor Kinship Relations ». lambda nordica 24, n^o 2-3 (18 février 2020) : 136–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.34041/ln.v24.583.

Texte intégral

Résumé :

This article explores kinship formation from the perspective of egg donors in Denmark. Through interviews with Danish egg donors, it investigates how the Danish legal framework and specific context, materialise egg donor kinship relations in third party reproduction. The article shows the ways egg donors negotiate normative ideals about family and motherhood through different kinship strategies. It argues that the donors’ relational kinship work is a form of social pioneering work, wherein donors help define what an egg donor kinship relation is and can be. This is analysed through the analytical concept of “appropriate distance.” The analysis shows how different normative constraints are embedded in the legal framework that structure which kinship relations are available. As an example, the different donor types in Denmark, anonymous, open, and known, become a way of disconnecting or connecting to kinship. In line with existing studies, it demonstrates how egg donation in Denmark is structured around ideals of altruism linked to normative ideals of femininity and motherhood. Further, it is concluded that egg donation proposes subversive potential for deconstructing heteronormative kinship ideals about motherhood. At the same time, however, the analyses conclude that heteronormative family ideals often are re-installed through egg donation practices.

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

39

Johnson, Katherine M. « My Gametes, My Right ? The Politics of Involving Donors' Partners in Egg and Sperm Donation ». Journal of Law, Medicine & ; Ethics 45, n^o 4 (2017) : 621–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1073110517750601.

Texte intégral

Résumé :

Gamete donation offers a unique opportunity to compare men and women's relationships to reproductive decision-making, unlike other reproductive processes, which typically involve women's bodies much more asymmetrically. I address medical and reproductive decision-making by examining how a gamete donor's partner may be involved in the donation process. Some countries explicitly involve a donor's partner by legally requiring spousal consent for donation, but this is not the case for the U.S. In the absence of any formal regulation, what are the expectations for involving a donor's partner? Through a content analysis of materials from donation programs across the U.S., I examine how donation programs configure the partner's role. Overall, I find that there are quite different expectations for partner involvement in egg versus sperm donation. Such differences, I argue, both stem from and reinforce existing issues navigating boundaries between intimate relationships and women's medical and reproductive autonomy.

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

40

Capulli, Emma, et Elvira Passaro. « Egg Donation in Art. Legal and Logical Arguments ». Studia Universitatis Babeş-Bolyai Bioethica 66, Special Issue (9 septembre 2021) : 40. http://dx.doi.org/10.24193/subbbioethica.2021.spiss.18.

Texte intégral

Résumé :

"The procuring of eggs and compensatory measures for donors today present unresolved ethical and conceptual issues, which fuel the growth of the assisted reproductive technology (ART) industry. The speech proposes a problematization of the phenomenon from a legal point of view, supported by a rhetorical-argumentative analysis of the legal institutions. The legal provision of oocytes admits the only donation. It was deduced by analogy from the legislative provisions of available of organs and tissues (law no. 458 of 1967; law no. 301 of 1993; law no. 91 of 1999; law no. 483 of 1999), which provides for the balance between impairment of the psycho-physical sphere and goods that benefit from it. Is this balance comparable to the available of oocytes? Or does it need an autonomous redefinition? The various national regulations show that in Europe the term donation includes not only solutions of substantial gratuity, but also various forms of compensation. On one side this shows the fragility of the definition of donation, rhetorically constructed through the Aristotelian argument of the dissociation between reimbursement and remuneration, and on the other it makes clear the need to use logical-argumentative tools to disclose the criterion of hierarchization of values in game. It remains to be understood how ethical reflection, led by an argumentative legal analysis, can provide the tools to improve the functioning of a system that seems to render donors’ rights unfit for use. "

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

41

Goedeke, Sonja, Daniel Shepherd et Iolanda S. Rodino. « Support for recognition and payment options for egg and sperm donation in New Zealand and Australia ». Human Reproduction 35, n^o 1 (1 janvier 2020) : 117–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/humrep/dez257.

Texte intégral

Résumé :

Abstract STUDY QUESTION To what extent do infertility clinic patients, fertility industry professionals and members of the public support different forms of payment and recognition for egg and sperm donation? SUMMARY ANSWER While participants expressed support for reimbursement of expenses for both egg and sperm donation, payment constituting explicit financial advantage was regarded less favourably although potentially necessary to address donor gamete shortages. WHAT IS KNOWN ALREADY In both New Zealand and Australia, commercial inducement for the supply of gametes is prohibited. This prohibition has been argued to contribute to limited availability of donor gametes with the effect of increasing waiting lists and/or the pursuit of potentially unregulated cross-border reproductive care by domestic patients requiring donor gametes. STUDY DESIGN, SIZE, DURATION The study was a mixed methods study drawing on data from a questionnaire completed by 434 participants from across New Zealand and Australia between November 2018 and March 2019. PARTICIPANTS/MATERIALS, SETTING, METHODS Stakeholders involved in donor-assisted conception (past and present infertility patients, gamete recipients and donors), fertility industry professionals and members of the public were recruited following online advertisement of the study. All participants spoke English and primarily identified as Caucasian. Participants anonymously completed an online questionnaire gauging their support for a range of recognition and payment options. Dependent samples t-tests were used to probe for differences in support of recognition and payment options in relation to egg and sperm donation. Linear regression models were used to determine factors predicting support for the different options for both egg and sperm donation. Thematic analysis was used to identify main themes in free text question responses. MAIN RESULTS AND THE ROLE OF CHANCE Broadly, there was agreement that donors be reimbursed for medical expenses, travel time, unpaid time away from work relating to treatments and out-of-pocket expenses directly related to the gamete donation process, with greater support suggested for egg versus sperm donors. Items gauging support for non-material recognition and tokens of thanks for donations were not significantly different between egg and sperm donation programmes (P > 0.05) nor rated as highly as reimbursement alternatives. Lowest ratings of support were indicated for the outright payment or reward of donors for the supply of their gametes, options that would leave donors in better financial positions. Qualitatively, themes valuing gamete donation as ideally relating to gifting were identified, although counterbalanced in opinion by concepts of fairness in reimbursing gamete donors for their costs. Where payment over and above the reimbursement of costs was supported, this was related to pragmatic considerations of limited supply of donor gametes. LIMITATIONS, REASONS FOR CAUTION This study used a cross-sectional design and consequently causal inferences cannot be made. Additionally, participants particularly professional fertility staff, were required to self-report on politically sensitive and legal issues with the potential for social desirability response bias. Snowball sampling may have led to participation of like-minded individuals, thus limiting generalizations of findings. WIDER IMPLICATIONS OF THE FINDINGS In a climate of global commercialization of reproductive medicine, limited donor gamete availability and rising incidences of cross-border reproductive care, the findings of this study can be used as a basis for further discussion between regulators and professional industry stakeholders with respect to shaping ethical policy and practice relating to donor conception. STUDY FUNDING/COMPETING INTEREST(S) No external funds were sought for this work. None of the authors have any competing interests to declare. TRIAL REGISTRATION NUMBER N/A.

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

42

Ben-Kimhy, Reut, et Orit Taubman–Ben-Ari. « Perceptions of Fertility Physicians Treating Women Undergoing IVF Using an Egg Donation ». International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health 19, n^o 12 (10 juin 2022) : 7159. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/ijerph19127159.

Texte intégral

Résumé :

In the course of their work, medical teams are routinely exposed to difficult and stressful situations. The few studies in the literature that have examined physicians’ perceptions and responses to such situations have focused primarily on the fields of emergency medicine and chronic and terminal illness. However, the field of fertility medicine can also evoke complex feelings among physicians. The present qualitative study examined the perceptions of fertility physicians treating women undergoing egg donation. Semi-structured in-depth interviews were conducted with 20 fertility physicians, and a categorical analysis was performed. The main category to emerge was the physicians’ perception of egg donation and its implications. Two prominent themes were identified within this category: doctor–patient communication surrounding egg donation and how the idea was presented to the patient; and doctors’ perception of the implications of egg donation, including maternal identity, the relationship between mother and infant, and the mother’s sense of the child’s identity. This is the first study to consider the response to fertility treatments, a contemporary and sensitive topic, from the perspective of the physicians. The findings can contribute to physicians’ understanding of themselves and can help to devise ways to assist them in managing their emotional responses to their work for the benefit of both themselves and their patients.

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

43

Kroløkke, Charlotte Halmø. « Udlandet tur-retur. Sådan får man også børn ». K&K - Kultur og Klasse 40, n^o 113 (20 juin 2012) : 101–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.7146/kok.v40i113.15723.

Texte intégral

Résumé :

GOING ABROAD AND BACK | How do Danish women negotiate egg donation when it involves travelling to clinics in Spain or the Czech Republic? This article employs anthropological and sociological feminist literature on assisted reproductive tech nologies and transnational reproduction to understand the dynamics at play when Danish women travel to Spain or the Czech Republic foregg donation. The empirical material includes interviews with Danish women who are either planning to travel or who have already travelled for egg donation. The essay suggests that Danish women employ conventional understandings of both femininity and nationalized discourses. They mediate their border crossings not only as a type of gifting but also as a particular type of transnational service. Fertility travel is naturalized, in these discourses in light of the interviewees’ desire to become mothers and, in the process, re-positioning transnational egg donation as a form of global sisterhood.

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

44

Lefor, Andi. « The Problem of Informed Consent in Egg Donation ». Ethics & ; Medics 42, n^o 4 (2017) : 2–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/em20174247.

Texte intégral

Résumé :

The success of the mass-market fertility industry is wholly dependent on the willingness of young women to donate their eggs to couples using assisted reproductive technologies. Though the industry commonly refers to this as donation, women rarely transfer their eggs without the guarantee of financial compensation. In fact, the economic advantages are often a coercive factor in a woman’s decision to participate in egg harvesting.

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

45

Seibel, Machelle. « Psychological Aspects of Egg Donation and Gestational Surrogacy ». Seminars in Reproductive Medicine 13, n^o 03 (août 1995) : 219–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-2007-1016362.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

46

Klein, Joshua, et Mark Sauer. « Ethics in Egg Donation : Past, Present, and Future ». Seminars in Reproductive Medicine 28, n^o 04 (juillet 2010) : 322–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0030-1255180.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

47

Carter‐Walshaw, Sarah. « In vitro gametogenesis : The end of egg donation ? » Bioethics 33, n^o 1 (23 août 2018) : 60–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/bioe.12499.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

48

Sutton, Agneta. « Is Payment for Egg Donation an Undue Inducement ? » New Bioethics 24, n^o 3 (2 septembre 2018) : 240–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/20502877.2018.1521497.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

49

Heng, BC. « The advent of international 'mail-order' egg donation ». BJOG : An International Journal of Obstetrics and Gynaecology 113, n^o 11 (novembre 2006) : 1225–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1471-0528.2006.01057.x.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

50

Steinbrook, Robert. « Egg Donation and Human Embryonic Stem-Cell Research ». New England Journal of Medicine 354, n^o 4 (26 janvier 2006) : 324–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.1056/nejmp058313.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

Articles de revues sur le sujet « Egg donation »

Créez une référence correcte selon les styles APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard et plusieurs autres