Littérature scientifique sur le sujet « Free movement and citizenship of the EU »

Créez une référence correcte selon les styles APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard et plusieurs autres

Choisissez une source :

Consultez les listes thématiques d’articles de revues, de livres, de thèses, de rapports de conférences et d’autres sources académiques sur le sujet « Free movement and citizenship of the EU ».

À côté de chaque source dans la liste de références il y a un bouton « Ajouter à la bibliographie ». Cliquez sur ce bouton, et nous générerons automatiquement la référence bibliographique pour la source choisie selon votre style de citation préféré : APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.

Vous pouvez aussi télécharger le texte intégral de la publication scolaire au format pdf et consulter son résumé en ligne lorsque ces informations sont inclues dans les métadonnées.

Articles de revues sur le sujet "Free movement and citizenship of the EU":

1

Damay, Ludivine, et Heidi Mercenier. « Free movement and EU citizenship : a virtuous circle ? » Journal of European Public Policy 23, no 8 (27 juin 2016) : 1139–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13501763.2016.1186212.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
2

Maas, Willem. « Free Movement and Discrimination : Evidence from Europe, the United States, and Canada ». European Journal of Migration and Law 15, no 1 (2013) : 91–110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15718166-12342025.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
Résumé :
Abstract This article surveys some general lessons to be drawn from the tension between the promise of citizenship to deliver equality and the particularistic drive to maintain diversity. Democratic states tend to guarantee free movement within their territory to all citizens, as a core right of citizenship. Similarly, the European Union guarantees (as the core right of EU citizenship) the right to live and the right to work anywhere within EU territory to EU citizens and members of their families. Such rights reflect the project of equality and undifferentiated individual rights for all who have the status of citizen. But they are not uncontested. Within the EU, several member states propose to reintroduce border controls and to restrict access for EU citizens who claim social assistance. Similar tensions and attempts to discourage freedom of movement also exist in other political systems, and the article gives examples from the United States and Canada. Within democratic states, particularly federal ones and others where decentralized jurisdictions are responsible for social welfare provision, it thus appears that some citizens can be more equal than others. Principles such as benefit portability, prohibition of residence requirements for access to programs or rights, and mutual recognition of qualifications and credentials facilitate the free flow of people within states and reflect the attempt to eliminate internal borders. Within the growing field of migration studies, most research focuses on international migration, movement between states, involving international borders. But migration across jurisdictional boundaries within states is at least as important as international migration. Within the European Union, free movement often means changing residence across jurisdictional boundaries within a political system with a common citizenship, even though EU citizenship is not traditional national citizenship. The EU is thus a good test of the tension between the equality promised by common citizenship and the diversity institutionalized by borders.
3

Mantu, Sandra, et Paul Minderhoud. « EU citizenship and social solidarity ». Maastricht Journal of European and Comparative Law 24, no 5 (octobre 2017) : 703–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1023263x17741271.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
Résumé :
In this article, we seek to place the CJEU’s recent case law on social rights for economically inactive EU citizens within the larger political context of the last couple of years that has been characterized by the increased contestation of the type of mobility underpinning EU citizenship. The relationship between EU citizenship and social solidarity – in the form of social rights for mobile EU citizens – has taken centre stage during the Brexit affair. Political debates concerning the free movement of (poor) EU citizens have focused upon the issues of the abuse of free movement rights and welfare tourism, despite a lack of evidence that the two are actually taking place on a large scale within the EU. The now defunct Brexit deal highlights the extension of debates that initially focused on economically inactive EU citizens to EU workers, whose mobility had been considered a positive aspect of EU integration. The scope of social solidarity in the EU is demoted as a result of judicial and political interventions that question the social dimension of EU citizenship and which may have implications for other groups of migrants situated within the EU.
4

McMahon, Joe, Adam Cygan et Erika Szyszczak. « II. Eu Citizenship ». International and Comparative Law Quarterly 55, no 4 (octobre 2006) : 977–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/iclq/lei139.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
Résumé :
The Court has continued with its expansive interpretation of the Citizenship provisions in Article 18 EC which it had previously acknowledged as being a fundamental right granted to all EU citizens by the Treaty.1 The case-law of the Court has, in particular, stressed the relationship between the free movement rights under Article 18 EC and preventing discrimination against EU nationals on grounds of nationality and without which the Citizenship provisions would lack force. Two recent judgments of Bidar2 and Ioannidis3 demonstrate the extent to which the Court will prevent covert discrimination on grounds of nationality. In a third judgment, that of Schempp,4 the Court, seemingly sensitive to criticism of interfering in domestic tax policy, adopts a more measured interpretation of discrimination when considering whether the rights granted under Article 18 EC are interfered with.
5

Shuibhne, Niamh Nic. « The resilience of EU market citizenship ». Common Market Law Review 47, Issue 6 (1 décembre 2010) : 1597–628. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/cola2010068.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
Résumé :
This article argues that EU citizenship has not (yet?) evolved beyond a construction of market citizenship. The argument does not make a normative claim that EU citizenship is “destined”, to paraphrase the Court of Justice, only and ever to remain a form of market citizenship. But drawing from both the nature of the EU as a polity and the material impact of its citizenship thus far, it suggests that market citizenship endures as at least one valid and credible way of capturing how EU citizenship has developed in reality. The particular qualities of the EU transnational market are explored so that the possibilities afforded by market citizenship are strongly contextualized. The intricate links between the EU and its Member States and the persisting significance of free movement rights are also discussed as defining characteristics of EU market citizenship. The growing impact of developments beyond free movement law is recognized to a certain extent, but this is not construed as an equally paced alchemic reaction in legal, social or political terms. The overall argument presented does not seek to dismiss or displace the wealth of normative thinking that conceptualizes EU citizenship (contested as it is) in both creative and challenging ways. Rather, the article reflects on the extent to which we are actually “there yet” in empirical terms.
6

Mantu, Sandra, et Paul Minderhoud. « Exploring the limits of social solidarity : welfare tourism and EU citizenship ». UNIO – EU Law Journal 2 (1 juin 2016) : 4–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.21814/unio.2.2.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
Résumé :
Political debates concerning the free movement of (poor) EU citizens (mainly from the newer EU Member States) have focused upon the twin issues of abuse of free movement rights and welfare tourism, despite the lack of meaningful evidence that the two are actually taking place on a wide scale in the EU. This article discusses the increasing political contestation of EU mobility as captured by notions such as, welfare tourism and poverty migration. The analysis of the case law of the Court of Justice of the European Union on issues of social rights and EU citizenship shows a noticeable shift towards stricter interpretations of the scope of social solidarity for mobile EU citizens. We argue that the coupling of these two aspects of EU mobility raises questions about the scope of EU citizenship and its nature as a fundamental status.
7

Balnaves, Hugo. « A Bride Run Free Movement of People in the EU, the Fundamental Right to Family, Family Reunification, and the Case of Denmark ». Nordic Journal of European Law 4, no 1 (26 août 2021) : 69–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.36969/njel.v4i1.23173.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
Résumé :
Danish legislation has made it increasingly difficult for Danish citizens who have not exercised their free movement (static EU citizens) to have their third country national (TCN) family member(s) reside with them in Denmark under family reunification. On the other hand, EU citizens (mobile EU citizens) who have exercised their free movement and reside in Denmark with their TCN family member(s), have access to far more generous EU family reunification legislation. This article explores the extent to which reverse discrimination effects Danish citizens compared to mobile EU compatriots living in Denmark and how this interacts with EU citizenship rights such as free movement and the fundamental right to family life.
8

Shaw, Jo. « Citizenship, Migration and Free Movement in Brexit Britain ». German Law Journal 17, S1 (1 juillet 2016) : 99–104. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s2071832200021787.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
Résumé :
Regardless of what happens in the next few months and years in the post-referendum UK, much of the harm has been done. The uncertainty, in particular, is killing. It will have a significant impact on many of the UK's most productive economic sectors including universities and financial services. It will cast a shadow over inward investment and over the willingness to take risks of those responsible, for example, for building new infrastructure. There will be a brain drain. Already in some respects the EU is acting as if the UK were no longer a Member State. It has no Commissioner since Jonathan Hill's resignation. After the EUCO summit on 29 June which took pace without the UK's presence, EU27 conclusions were issued.
9

Staver, Anne. « Free Movement and the Fragmentation of Family Reunification Rights ». European Journal of Migration and Law 15, no 1 (2013) : 69–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15718166-12342024.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
Résumé :
Abstract Family reunification regulations in the EU are increasingly complex, and they vary for different groups of sponsors. This paper documents the existence of four parallel legal regimes for family reunification — national rules for citizens who do not move, EU rules for citizens who move within Europe, the Family Reunification Directive for third-country nationals in the EU, and since 2011, family reunification rights based on EU citizenship status. This paper asks how and why family reunification rules are being thus fragmented, and in particular why so-called ‘reverse discrimination’, where citizens are disadvantaged vis-à-vis non-citizens, is persisting and deepening. It draws on tools from political science, namely historical institutionalism and studies of policy transfer and Europeanization, to showcase the different logics that underlie these puzzling developments.
10

Bouveresse, Aude. « The Ambiguous Relationship Between the EU and its Internal Borders ». Borders in Globalization Review 1, no 2 (21 août 2020) : 64–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.18357/bigr12202019567.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
Résumé :
The free movement of EU citizens within the Union reveals the ambiguous relationship between the EU and borders. While the functioning of the internal market is essentially based on freedom of movement and implies the elimination of borders as barriers to trade, the freedom of movement of the European citizen remains defined largely within the conceptual framework of borders, since nationality is a prime requirement for European citizenship. Inside the EU, as this article highlights, borders are necessary and problematic at same time. The Court has played with the concept of borders to address these ambiguities with a view to deepening integration. The conclusion is that if the Court has been able to effectively remove obstacles related to internal borders concerning the free movement of goods and the movement of active economic persons, such has not been the case for the free movement of European citizens, economically inactive. It follows from the division of competences and the case law of the European judges that solidarity remains intrinsically linked to nationality and therefore inevitably leads to the re-establishment of borders and the separation of peoples. This demonstrates the resistance of the “paradigm of a European market citizenship”. By revaluing nationality in the context of the enjoyment of the rights linked to citizenship, the European Court of Justice could hamper the integration process by renationalising the individual and establishing new borders.

Thèses sur le sujet "Free movement and citizenship of the EU":

1

Berglund, Emma. « Rights, Inclusion and Free Movement : Social Rights and Citizenship in the European Union ». Thesis, Stockholms universitet, Sociologiska institutionen, 2016. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:su:diva-131864.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
Résumé :
The free movement of persons in the EU has been fraught with tension since the Eastern enlargements. This culminated in 2016 when the UK demanded the possibility to limit rights and benefits to intra-EU migrants, making for a fresh investigation into the state of the free movement. From a constructivist perspective of rights and citizenship this in-depth case study aims to elucidate how EU actors describe the free movement of persons. It will further look at how they situate limitations and obstacles and analyze what this reflects in terms of underlying logics and rationales of rights and citizenship in the EU free movement regime. The interviews with EU actors reveal how distinctions of politically constructed categories of migrants which define Insiders and Outsiders are used to rationalize who has the right to social rights. Inclusion is defined in terms of market liberalism and individual responsibility, logics which thus also define the Insiders of Europe. This produces an image of the EU citizen and indirectly defines those who diverge from this image as Outsiders, including “lesser” Europeans. The underlying logics within the EU could therefore contribute to negative perceptions of those who cannot meet the requirements of the ideal European.
2

O'Brien, Charlotte Rachel. « Between angels and serfs : fitting disabled, caring or older volunteers into the EU framework of free movement, equal treatment and citizenship ». Thesis, University of Liverpool, 2009. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.533953.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
3

Golynker, Oxana. « The basis of regulation of free movement for partial migrants in the EU : correlation between the concepts of Union citizenship and bona-fide residence ». Thesis, University of Leicester, 2003. http://hdl.handle.net/2381/31082.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
Résumé :
So far legal analysis of the phenomenon of partial migration in the European Union has been scattered across studies of isolated groups of rights. The aim of this research is to provide a systematic conceptualisation of this area by establishing the role of the concepts of Union citizenship and bona fide residence in a Member State in shaping and protection of socio-economic rights of partial migrants consequent on their right to free movement. On the basis of examination of the experience of other complex political entities, this study aspires to contribute to the theory of European Union citizenship by bringing the issue of rights of economically active persons whose migration pattern deviates from the mainstream free movement of workers and the self-employed within the discourse of Union citizenship. The scope of the rights of partial migrants is delimited by approaching the conflict between the aforementioned categories as an instantiation of the opposition between the national welfare state and the supra-national entity of the European Union. In this connection, this research is focused on such rights as the right to free movement and residence, and the rights in the welfare-related domains of social security, taxation, and housing which are identified by the Commission as particularly complicated, and on the most topical forms of partial migration in relation to which a great number of challenging conceptual problems have been identified. In this thesis a variety of methods is used. Firstly, we use the method of analysis developed within the coherence theory. Secondly, two methods of analysis identified by J Shaw are employed. The first one draws upon the formally identified sources of citizenship rules and rights in the Treaty along with other closely related sources of law in the form of secondary legislation and Court of Justice case law. The second method applies explanatory tools from the contextual citizenship agenda of the Treaty. Finally, the research is based on the comparative law method. The shaping and protection of socio-economic rights of partial migrants in a complex entity such as the European Union is defined by the balance between their status as Union citizens, on the one hand, and their status as bona fide residents, non-bona-fide residents, and non-resident workers and the self-employed tied to the welfare systems of the Member States. The role of the Treaty provisions on Union citizenship as a constitutional basis in protection or partial migrants' rights is still incipient. However, the meaningfulness of the concept of Union citizenship for partial migrants is ultimately defined by the process of approximation of their socio-economic membership in the respective communities of their Member States of residence and work as well as membership in the greater community of the European Union to the ideal of full membership for partial migrants. The coherence of the construct of Union citizenship is tested within this continuum (with reference to specific areas identified in this study) according to the scope of rights enjoyed by partial migrants under Community law.
4

Steinfeld, Martin Henry. « Free movement of persons and social constructivism ? : a social constructivist perspective on the emergence of the concept of EU citizenship prior to its formal establishment in the Treaty on European Union ». Thesis, University of Cambridge, 2015. https://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.709133.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
5

Stalford, Helen Elizabeth. « Children, citizenship and free movement in the European Union : a socio-legal analysis of the educational status and experiences of the children of EU migrant workers ». Thesis, University of Leeds, 2001. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.400380.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
6

Oguz, Gonul. « EU enlargement and the free movement of Turkish labour ». Thesis, University of Reading, 2009. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.509841.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
7

O'Leary, Síofra. « The evolving concept of Community citizenship : from the free movement of persons to Union citizenship / ». The Hague : Kluwer Law International, 1996. http://catalogue.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cb37751916p.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
8

Gaye, Kadiata. « La nécessaire amélioration de la situation juridique de tous les travailleurs migrants dans l'union européenne quelque soit leur Etat d'origine ». Electronic Thesis or Diss., Normandie, 2017. http://www.theses.fr/2017NORMLH35.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
Résumé :
Au sein de l’UE, les travailleurs migrants sont ressortissants des États membres et des État tiers. Mais, les règles qui leur sont applicables sont très différentes. Les travailleurs ressortissants des États membres ont un statut privilégié lié à la libre circulation et à la citoyenneté de l’UE. Toutefois, ils sont confrontés aux discriminations exacerbées par la disparité des législations nationales et la crise économique. Le tableau est encore moins reluisant pour les travailleurs ressortissants d’États tiers. A leur niveau, les discriminations sont à plusieurs échelles liées à la multiplicité des statuts de ressortissants d’États tiers. L’éparpillement des règles applicables entre droits nationaux, droit de l’UE et accords internationaux génèrent un imbroglio législatif et réglementaire. La segmentation du droit applicable aux travailleurs migrants est ainsi source de disparités de traitement et de concurrence entre les travailleurs. L’amélioration de leur situation juridique est dès lors nécessaire. Elle peut se faire grâce à l’harmonisation du statut de tous les travailleurs migrants, source de cohésion sociale et d’égalité. Elle passe par l’égalité de traitement entre les travailleurs qui est nécessaire pour l’accès à l’emploi, une vie familiale normale, le bénéfice des prestations sociales et la participation à la gestion de la cité. En attendant l’adoption de la citoyenneté européenne de résidence qui réduirait fortement l’éparpillement des règles et les discriminations, la quête de l’égalité passera par l’acquisition de la nationalité du pays d’accueil. Les droits inhérents à la nationalité restent, en principe, le meilleur garant de l’égalité de traitement
Within the EU, migrant workers are nationals of Member States and third countries. But the rules that apply to them are very different. Workers who are nationals of the Member States have a privileged status linked to the free movement and citizenship of the EU. However, they face discrimination, exacerbated by disparities in national legislation and the economic crisis. The picture is even less striking for workers who are nationals of third countries. At their level, discrimination on several levels is linked to the multiplicity of the statutes of third-country nationals. The scattering of the applicable rules between national laws, EU law and international agreements generate a legislative and regulatory imbroglio. The segmentation of the law applicable to migrant workers thus leads to disparities in treatment and competition between workers. The improvement of their legal situation is therefore necessary. It can be achieved through the harmonization of the status of all migrant workers: a source of social cohesion and equality. It involves equal treatment of workers, which is necessary for access to employment, normal family life, the enjoyment of social benefits and participation in the management of the city. Pending the adoption of European citizenship of residence which would greatly reduce the scattering of rules and discrimination, the quest for equality will require the acquisition of the nationality of the host country. In principle, the rights inherent in nationality remain the best guarantee of equal treatment
9

Duranic, Alen. « Free movement of labour in enlarged EU and impact on Swedish labour market ». Thesis, Södertörn University College, School of Business Studies, 2005. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-301.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
Résumé :

The goal of this diploma thesis is to expound the term “labour mobility” within an enlarged European Union, and its consequences on Swedish economy. Fears of a massive wave of working migration proved unfounded at the time of past EU enlargements and thus are not likely to come true during the forthcoming enlargement.

The analysis of the experience stemming from the southern enlargement can be helpful in an attempt to evaluate gains and losses of the CEE countries integration with the EU. The southern enlargement is being often regarded as an example or even basis for the EU eastern enlargement. This approach is not a random one. The analysis of the EU southern enlargement based on the case of Greece, Spain and Portugal reflects the likeness of the current accession conditions: both the southern candidates and the CEE countries aspiring to join in the 2004 are traditionally net emigration countries with considerable lower level of economic development than those of the EU average.

Great differences in income, standard of living and employment opportunities between CEE and EU countries might contribute to a mass-immigration from east to west and might accelerate the current employment crisis in the present EU states. Notably, OECD studies show that migrants form the CEECs tend to be educated, skilled and vital workers. The brain drain problem may be a serious negative side effect for CEECs.

What Sweden, as a current EU member, and Swedish enterprise has to puts a stress on, is an importance to create a growing and flexible labour market. A more flexible labour market in general must be promoted, including making it easier for companies to find people with the right skills.

Swedish labour market, in spite of how inelastic it may be, has a strong demand for low-qualified labour under any level of unemployment. Even if the CEECs migration potential had been fully used, it would never be able to satisfy this demand. Neither disparity in GDP per capita, unemployment, nor other economic differences between the CEE countries and the EU may create grounds for the implementation of the transitional periods. This causality has been many times proved theoretically, empirically and during the previous EU enlargements.

The introduction of the transitional periods may prolong the process of leveling life-levels, technological and economic growth, infrastructure, cultural and social standards within the enlarged EU. It also means sending the political signal to the accession countries, which would be turned into second-class members, deprived of one of the most vital freedoms of the Single Market.

10

Horsley, Thomas. « Space to breathe : subsidiarity, the Court of Justice and EU Free Movement Law ». Thesis, University of Edinburgh, 2012. http://hdl.handle.net/1842/6390.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
Résumé :
This thesis explores subsidiarity's untapped potential as an enforceable legal principle in EU law. To date, discussion of the principle's function in European integration remains overly focused on its effect as a restraint on the Union legislature. In the first part of the thesis, I seek to challenge this entrenched view. Specifically, I question whether or not the subsidiarity principle could and, ultimately, should apply also as a brake on the interpretative authority of the Court of Justice. Arguing that subsidiarity does indeed have a role to play in this context, I then turn to examine, in the second part of the thesis, the implications of this conclusion for the Court's interpretation of the scope of the Treaty provisions guaranteeing intra-EU movement. In the final analysis, I argue that the subsidiarity principle necessitates an adjustment of the Court's current approach to defining the concept of an obstacle to intra-EU movement. This adjustment isolates and protects an appropriate sphere of Member State regulatory competence from the Court's scrutiny at Union level. In so doing, it ensures that, in the process of establishing and managing a functioning internal market, Member States retain some space to breathe.

Livres sur le sujet "Free movement and citizenship of the EU":

1

Broberg, Morten P. Free movement in the European Union. 2e éd. Copenhagen : DJØF Pub., 2007.

Trouver le texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
2

Broberg, Morten P. Free movement in the European Union. 4e éd. Copenhagen, Denmark : DJØF Publishing, 2014.

Trouver le texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
3

Broberg, Morten P. Free movement in the European Union. 3e éd. Copenhagen : DJØF Pub., 2010.

Trouver le texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
4

Thym, Daniel, et Margarite Zoeteweij-Turhan. Rights of third-country nationals under EU association agreements : Degrees of free movement and citizenship. Leiden : Brill Nijhoff, 2015.

Trouver le texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
5

Recchi, Ettore. Mobile Europe : The theory and practice of free movement in the EU. Houndsmills, Basingstoke, Hampshire : Palgrave Macmillan, 2015.

Trouver le texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
6

Hennion, Sylvie, et Otto Kaufmann, dir. Unionsbürgerschaft und Patientenfreizügigkeit Citoyenneté Européenne et Libre Circulation des Patients EU Citizenship and Free Movement of Patients. Berlin, Heidelberg : Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41311-7.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
7

Weiss, Friedl. Free movements of persons within the European Community. 2e éd. Alphen aan den Rijn : Kluwer Law International, 2007.

Trouver le texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
8

Gasiokwu, Martin U. ECOWAS : Problems of citizenship and free movement. Jos, Plateau State [Nigeria] : Mono Expressions, 1998.

Trouver le texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
9

Handoll, John. Free movement of persons in the EU. Chichester : J. Wiley, 1995.

Trouver le texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
10

Toner, Helen. Partnership rights, free movement, and EU law. Oxford : Hart, 2004.

Trouver le texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

Chapitres de livres sur le sujet "Free movement and citizenship of the EU":

1

Siklodi, Nora. « Citizenship, Free Movement and the EU ». Dans Politics of Citizenship and Migration, 27–72. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-49051-5_2.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
2

De Witte, Floris. « EU Citizenship, Free Movement and Emancipation : A Rejoinder ». Dans IMISCOE Research Series, 169–78. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89905-3_33.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
3

Hailbronner, Kay. « Free Movement of EU Nationals and Union Citizenship ». Dans International Migration Law : Developing Paradigms and Key Challenges, 313–28. The Hague : T.M.C. Asser Press, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-473-8_18.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
4

Koikkalainen, Saara. « Free Movement and EU Citizenship from the Perspective of Intra-European Mobility ». Dans IMISCOE Research Series, 121–24. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89905-3_24.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
5

Wagner, Caroline, et Frank Verheyen. « Aspects of Planned EU Cross-border Care ». Dans Unionsbürgerschaft und Patientenfreizügigkeit Citoyenneté Européenne et Libre Circulation des Patients EU Citizenship and Free Movement of Patients, 99–113. Berlin, Heidelberg : Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41311-7_8.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
6

Hohnerlein, Eva Maria. « Die Vorabgenehmigung für grenzüberschreitende Gesundheitsleistungen in der EU ». Dans Unionsbürgerschaft und Patientenfreizügigkeit Citoyenneté Européenne et Libre Circulation des Patients EU Citizenship and Free Movement of Patients, 235–51. Berlin, Heidelberg : Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41311-7_20.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
7

Neuvonen, Päivi Johanna. « Free Movement as a Means of Subject-Formation : Defending a More Relational Approach to EU Citizenship ». Dans IMISCOE Research Series, 113–15. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-89905-3_22.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
8

Giraud, Amandine. « Fragen zur Umsetzung der Richtlinie 2011/24/EU vom 9. März 2011, unter besonderer Berücksichtigung finanzieller Aspekte ». Dans Unionsbürgerschaft und Patientenfreizügigkeit Citoyenneté Européenne et Libre Circulation des Patients EU Citizenship and Free Movement of Patients, 167–70. Berlin, Heidelberg : Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41311-7_13.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
9

Kaufmann, Otto. « Les instruments juridiques des soins transfrontaliers ». Dans Unionsbürgerschaft und Patientenfreizügigkeit Citoyenneté Européenne et Libre Circulation des Patients EU Citizenship and Free Movement of Patients, 3–14. Berlin, Heidelberg : Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41311-7_1.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
10

André, Jean-Marie. « La place des dépenses de santé dans l’économie européenne ». Dans Unionsbürgerschaft und Patientenfreizügigkeit Citoyenneté Européenne et Libre Circulation des Patients EU Citizenship and Free Movement of Patients, 127–44. Berlin, Heidelberg : Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-41311-7_10.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

Actes de conférences sur le sujet "Free movement and citizenship of the EU":

1

Barbullushi, Marv, et Eriol Braimllari. « EU citizenship and free movement : the exception for “social burdens” ». Dans University for Business and Technology International Conference. Pristina, Kosovo : University for Business and Technology, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.33107/ubt-ic.2018.262.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
2

Ay, Ahmet, Fatih Ayhan et Mustafa Gerçeker. « Analyzing the Free Movement of Goods Principle in European Union ». Dans International Conference on Eurasian Economies. Eurasian Economists Association, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.36880/c06.01419.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
Résumé :
In this paper, it will be analyzed the free movement of goods principle’s progress in European Union. This principle have special importance for all countries not only EU members. Because of globalisation’s effects, all countries have to open their boundaries to all over the World. Thus the free movement of goods affects almost all countries. Free movement of goods principle is achieved a successful progress in EU case. In this paper, we will try to show this principle’s success in EU agreements, regulations, settlements and peaks. Not only in EU, but also all open economies are getting extra benefit from trade. Free movement of goods is a part of international trade and also first step of EU integration process. Followings steps are consisting of free movement of capitals, services and human. In this paper, we’ll show the meaning and importance of this principle and its historical progress in EU. And also it will be analyzed to basic drawback, preventions, and exceptions of this principle.
3

Duić, Dunja, et Veronika Sudar. « THE IMPACT OF COVID-19 ON THE FREE MOVEMENT OF PERSONS IN THE EU ». Dans EU 2021 – The future of the EU in and after the pandemic. Faculty of Law, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.25234/eclic/18298.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
Résumé :
The impact of the COVID-19 outbreak is being endured throughout the world, and the European Union (EU) is no exception. The rapid spreading of the virus effected, among other things, restriction on the freedom of movement. The EU member states introduced national response measures to contain the pandemic and protect public health. While broadly similar, the measures differ with regard to strictness and the manner of introduction, reflecting the political legitimacy of the respective country. With the ‘Guidelines concerning the exercise of the free movement of workers during COVID-19 outbreak’ – its first COVID-19-related Communication – the European Commission (EC) attempted to curb differing practices of the EU member states and ensure a coordinated approach. Ultimately, this action was aimed at upholding of fundamental rights as guaranteed to EU citizens, one such being the freedom of movement. Thus, from the very start of the pandemic, the coordinated actions of EU institutions sought to contain the spread of COVID-19 infections with the support and cooperation of EU member states. This is confirmed by the most recent Council of the EU (Council) recommendation on a coordinated approach to restrictions to freedom of movement within the EU of October 2020. While they did prevent the spread of infection and save countless lives, the movement restriction measures and the resulting uncertainty have greatly affected the people, the society, and the economy, thereby demonstrating that they cannot remain in force for an extended period. This paper examines the measures introduced by EU member states and analyses the legal basis for introducing therewith limitations on human rights and market freedoms. To what extent are the EU and member states authorized to introduce restrictions on the freedom of movement in the interest of public health? Have the EU and member states breached their obligations regarding market freedoms and fundamental rights under the Treaty? And most importantly: have they endangered the fundamental rights of the citizens of the EU?
4

Duduci, Meri. « ECONOMIC EVALUATION OF THE FREE MOVEMENT OF CIZIZENST IN THE EU ». Dans DOKBAT 2018. Tomas Bata University in Zlín, Faculty of Management and Economics, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.7441/dokbat.2018.04.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
5

Lang, Alessandra. « OF BIOMETRIC DOCUMENTS, DATABASES AND FREE MOVEMENT OF PERSONS IN THE EU ». Dans International Scientific Conference on International, EU and Comparative Law Issues “Law in the Age of Modern Technologies”. Faculty of Law, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.25234/eclic/28260.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
6

Potorac, Doina. « The role of DCFTA in the development of the national economy of the Republic of Moldova ». Dans Simpozion stiintific al tinerilor cercetatori, editia 20. Academy of Economic Studies of Moldova, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.53486/9789975359023.05.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
Résumé :
Moldova-EU free trade agreement implies gradual liberalization (up to 10 years from signing) of trade in goods and services, free movement of labor, reduction of customs duties, technical and non-tariff barriers, abolition of quantitative restrictions and harmonization of EU acquisitions. Thus, the DCFTA (Deep and Comprehensive Free Trade Area between the Republic of Moldova and the European Union) is part of the European Association Agreement and brings additional economic benefits to the Republic of Moldova.
7

Čepo, Marina. « DETENTION OF ASYLUM SEEKERS THROUGH THE PRACTICE OF THE COURT OF JUSTICE OF THE EUROPEAN UNION ON THE EXAMPLE OF THE REPUBLIC OF HUNGARY AND THE PERSPECTIVES OF THE NEW PACT ON MIGRATION AND ASYLUM ». Dans EU 2021 – The future of the EU in and after the pandemic. Faculty of Law, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.25234/eclic/18301.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
Résumé :
Restrictions on freedom of movement, in particular the detention of asylum seekers as the most severe form of such restrictions, constitute an interference with fundamental human rights and must be approached with particular care. In view of the migration and refugee crisis, the Republic of Hungary has begun to amend its asylum legislation, thus tightening the conditions for the detention of asylum seekers. The introduction of the provision establishing that asylum may be sought only in transit zones has also led to the gradual detention of asylum seekers in transit zones, which Hungary did not consider as detention. This issue was brought before the Court of Justice of the European Union (hereinafter: CJEU), which drastically changed the path taken by the Hungarian government when it comes to detaining asylum seekers. What the CJEU has found is that leaving people in transit zones without the right to free movement is to be considered detention, even though they are not specialized detention facilities. The CJEU ordered that such a practice must cease immediately. Therefore, this paper will examine the Hungarian practice following the judgment of the CJEU. The CJEU has taken a major step towards protecting the rights of asylum seekers as regards detention, and the EU recently adopted amendments as part of the new Pact on Migration and Asylum aimed at improving the existing asylum system. The second part of the paper analyzes the provisions of the new Pact on Migration and Asylum related to detention in order to determine whether the proposed amendments contribute to the Common European Asylum System and the protection of the human rights of asylum seekers or represent a step backwards.
8

DOBRE, Florin, Amza MAIR, Alexandru VASILESCU et Anna KANT. « ANALYSIS OF THE EVOLUTION OF THE TRANSPORT FLEET AT EU LEVEL ». Dans International Management Conference. Editura ASE, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.24818/imc/2021/02.18.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
Résumé :
The general transport network in the European Union is of particular importance, especially given the operation of the two directives on the free movement of goods and services within the European Community. Transport is a strategic sector of the EU economy, which directly affects the daily lives of all EU citizens. Transportation services provide about 11 million jobs. They are a cornerstone of European integration, with fully interconnected and sustainable transport networks being a necessary condition for the completion and proper functioning of the European single market. The transport of goods and goods is carried out by road, rail, sea and air. Each of these transport routes has particularities that are suitable, depending on the group of goods, for the movement of goods. The European Union has adopted its own strategy aimed at developing and harmonizing the transport network in each Member State, so as to achieve a single transport network at Union level. In this context, using the data provided by Eurostat, the authors carry out a detailed analysis of the perspective of transport developments in the European Union. The volume of passenger and freight transport in the EU has increased in recent decades and this trend is expected to continue, albeit at a slower pace. Transport is an area of shared EU competence, which means that Member States can exercise their own competence, unless the EU has formulated common transport policies and strategies.
9

Barkane, Irena, Katharina O’Cathaoir, Santa Slokenberga et Helen Eenmaa. « The Legal Implications of COVID-19 Vaccination Certificates : Implementation Experiences from Nordic and Baltic Region ». Dans The 8th International Scientific Conference of the Faculty of Law of the University of Latvia. University of Latvia Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.22364/iscflul.8.2.15.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
Résumé :
EU Digital green certificates were initially envisaged as a joint EU initiative to facilitate free movement during the pandemic. However, many countries rapidly extended their use in different contexts at the national level, raising serious ethical and legal concerns and questions, in particular, on how to strike a right balance between the interests of the individual and the interests of society. The paper aims to explore the legal implications of using vaccination certificates at the national level, in particular by exploring and comparing practices in selected Nordic and Baltic countries. The article emphasises that, despite COVID-19 crises, the governments should protect fundamental rights and values and when deciding on new restrictions carefully assess their necessity and proportionality. National responses call for a new regulatory framework to ensure responsible use of digital technologies in public interests.
10

Andreeva, Andriyana, et Mariyana Shirvaniyan. « ON SOME QUESTIONS FOR PROTECTION OF THE PERSONAL DATA IN THE WORK BOOK ». Dans PROTECTION OF THE PERSONAL DATA AND THE DIGITALIZATION 2021. University publishing house "Science and Economics", University of Economics - Varna, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.36997/ppdd2021.64.

Texte intégral
Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.
Résumé :
The report analyzes the current legislation regulating the institute of "work book" in the aspect of personal data protection of natural persons. The accent is put on the legal nature of the work book and examines the quality of the subjects employer and employee in the context of the requirements according to the Personal Data Protection Act (PDPA) and REGULATION (EU) 2016/679 OF THE EUROPEAN PARLIAMENT AND OF THE COUNCIL of 27 April 2016 on the protection of natural persons with regard to the processing of personal data and on the free movement of such data, and repealing Directive 95/46/EC (General Data Protection Regulation). Based on the analysis summaries, conclusions and recommendations are made.

Vers la bibliographie