Littérature scientifique sur le sujet « Plum pox virus (PPV) »
Créez une référence correcte selon les styles APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard et plusieurs autres
Consultez les listes thématiques d’articles de revues, de livres, de thèses, de rapports de conférences et d’autres sources académiques sur le sujet « Plum pox virus (PPV) ».
À côté de chaque source dans la liste de références il y a un bouton « Ajouter à la bibliographie ». Cliquez sur ce bouton, et nous générerons automatiquement la référence bibliographique pour la source choisie selon votre style de citation préféré : APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.
Vous pouvez aussi télécharger le texte intégral de la publication scolaire au format pdf et consulter son résumé en ligne lorsque ces informations sont inclues dans les métadonnées.
Articles de revues sur le sujet "Plum pox virus (PPV)":
Polák, J., J. Kumar, B. Krška et M. Ravelonandro. « Biotech/GM crops in horticulture : plum cv. HoneySweet resistant to Plum pox virus ». Plant Protection Science 48, Special Issue (12 décembre 2012) : S43—S48. http://dx.doi.org/10.17221/37/2012-pps.
Polák, J. « Distribution of Plum pox virus in the Czech Republic   ; ». Plant Protection Science 38, No. 3 (6 février 2012) : 98–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.17221/4859-pps.
Mihaljfi, Teodora, Renata Iličić, Goran Barać, Zagorka Savić et Ferenc Bagi. « Importance and symptomatology of plum pox virus ». Biljni lekar 49, no 5 (2021) : 602–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.5937/biljlek2105602m.
Polák, J., et J. Pívalová. « Sporadic distribution of Plum pox virus M strain in natural sources in the Czech Republic ». Horticultural Science 32, No. 3 (23 novembre 2011) : 85–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.17221/3770-hortsci.
Polák, J. « Viruses of blackthorn and road-bordering trees of plum, myrobalan, sweet and sour cherries in the Czech Republic ». Plant Protection Science 43, No. 1 (7 janvier 2008) : 1–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.17221/2351-pps.
Hauptmanová, A., et J. Polák. « The elimination of Plum pox virus in plum cv. Bluefree and apricot cv. Hanita by chemotherapy of in vitro cultures ». Horticultural Science 38, No. 2 (3 mai 2011) : 49–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.17221/10/2010-hortsci.
Polák, J., M. Ravelonandro, J. Kumar-Kundu, J. Pívalová et R. Scorza. « Interactions of Plum pox virus strain Rec with Apple chlorotic leafspot virus and Prune dwarf viruses in field-grown transgenic plum Prunus domestica L., clone C5 ». Plant Protection Science 44, No. 1 (10 avril 2008) : 1–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.17221/535-pps.
Jevremovic, Darko, et Svetlana Paunovic. « Plum pox virus strains : Diversity and geographical distribution in Serbia ». Pesticidi i fitomedicina 29, no 2 (2014) : 97–107. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/pif1402097j.
Ravelonandro, Michel, Pascal Briard, Ralph Scorza, Ann Callahan, Ioan Zagrai, Jiban K. Kundu et Chris Dardick. « Robust Response to Plum pox virus Infection via Plant Biotechnology ». Genes 12, no 6 (27 mai 2021) : 816. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/genes12060816.
Krška, B., J. Salava, J. Polák et P. Komínek. « Genetics of resistance to Plum pox virus in apricot ». Plant Protection Science 38, SI 1 - 6th Conf EFPP 2002 (1 janvier 2002) : 180–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.17221/10350-pps.
Thèses sur le sujet "Plum pox virus (PPV)":
FERRI, BODIN MANUELLE. « Etudes in vitro et in vivo des interactions prunus - plum pox virus (ppv) ». Montpellier, ENSA, 2000. http://www.theses.fr/2000ENSA0025.
Müller, Imke. « Zum Resistenzverhalten von Prunus domestica L. und P. armeniaca L. gegenüber dem Plum Pox virus (PPV, Potyvirus) ». Berlin Köster, 2005. http://deposit.ddb.de/cgi-bin/dokserv?id=2759143&prov=M&dok_var=1&dok_ext=htm.
Poque, Sylvain. « Identification de nouveaux mécanismes de résistance au Plum Pox Virus chez Arabidopsis thaliana ». Thesis, Bordeaux 2, 2012. http://www.theses.fr/2012BOR21998/document.
The Plum Pox Virus (PPV) infects Prunus species (stone fruit) and is the causal agent of the Sharka disease. This disease is vastly devastating for fruit and plant productivity and quality. Its cost reaches 10 billions of euros over the last 30 years. Breeding programs have been carried out with the aim to implement resistant cultivars but the number of sources of resistance in Prunus species is rather limited. It has been shown in the laboratory that this virus is able to infect Arabidopsis thaliana with a wide range of response to infection. Indeed, we observed that accessions St-0 and JEA had a resistant behavior, while accession Cvi-1 was partially resistant. Two inoculation methods were compared: mechanical inoculation from Nicotiana benthamiana leaves inoculated with pICPPVnkGFP and agro-inoculation infection from an Agrobacterium strain containing the viral isolate tumesfasciens pBINPPVnkGFP. The use of these two methods of inoculation allows us to highlight variability in the response to PPV depending on the method used. This study aims to identify the factor (s) of the host (s) involved in viral infection. Agro-infection of recombinant populations (F2 and RIL), multi-parental lines and the use of genetic association demonstrate in St-0 and several distinct accessions (seven) a major locus on linkage group 3, called sha3. It appears essential in the long-distance movement of PPV. Use of association genetics helped initiate the fine mapping of sha3 and significantly reduce the number of candidate genes. Screening of mutants was initiated to determine the gene controlling the phenotype Sha3. After mechanical inoculation, the analysis of a recombinant population revealed the presence of a major locus positioned in the middle of the long arm of linkage group 1. This locus co-localizes with rpv1, previously identified in Cvi x Ler offspring (Sicard, Loudet et al. 2008). The same locus was also confirmed with a multi-parental population and by a genetic association approach. A candidate gene is currently being validated in the laboratory. The study of the resistance mechanism carried by the accession JEA was initiated. In this case, it appears that the spread of the virus is inhibited in basal leaves but not in floral stem. The resistance / susceptibility to PPV in JEA appear to be strongly influenced by the physiological stages of the host plant. Further work will be necessary to describe more precisely this resistance mechanism very special. At the end of this thesis, we expect that the identification of these new resistance genes in Arabidopsis allows, after transfer, to increase the diversity of sources of resistance to plum pox virus in fruit trees
Müller, Imke. « Zum Resistenzverhalten von Prunus domestica L. und P. armeniaca L. gegenüber dem Plum pox virus (PPV, Potyvirus) / ». Berlin : Köster, 2006. http://deposit.ddb.de/cgi-bin/dokserv?id=2759143&prov=M&dok_var=1&dok_ext=htm.
Varrelmann, Mark. « Begrenzung von heterologer Enkapsidierung und Rekombination bei pathogen-vermittelter Resistenz gegen das Plum pox virus der Pflaume (PPV) ». [S.l. : s.n.], 1999. http://deposit.ddb.de/cgi-bin/dokserv?idn=958530033.
Espinoza, Christian. « Approche métabolomique non-ciblée pour révéler les réponses métaboliques des prunus à l'infection par le PPV, conduisant au développement d'un outil de détection innovant pour la détection précoce de la maladie de la sharka et la sauvegarde des vergers en Occitanie ». Thesis, Perpignan, 2022. http://www.theses.fr/2022PERP0018.
Sharka disease, caused by Plum pox virus (PPV), is responsible for significant economic losses in Prunus. However, no preventive or curative treatments are currently available and only a few sources of natural resistance have been found. In France, a prophylactic approach has been adopted in an attempt to limit the spread of the PPV, which is essentially based on the rapid detection and removal of infected trees. However, certain technical and economic limitations do not allow the early andeffective detection of PPV on a large scale by conventional methods. The department of Pyrénées Orientales (France) is the most affected by this disease (85% of infections). These issues motivated the creation of the Antishark project, which is the result of a collaboration between AkiNaO, the University of Perpignan Via Domitia, FDGDON66 and local producers. The objective of the project was to develop an innovative method of early detection, targeting the metabolic responses of Prunuspersica at an early stage of the infection. Consequently, two studies under monitored conditions using an untargeted metabolomics approach (UHPLC-HRMS) were carried out. This approach is a promising tool to reveal the metabolic interactions between PPV and its host. In a first study, the global metabolic response to PPV-infection (Dideron and Marcus strains), including symptomatic and asymptomatic leaves, allowed the discrimination of metabolic profiles from PPV-infected and healthy leaves. Although there was a common response between the two strains, metabolic differences were also revealed, notably highlighting strain-specific metabolic alterations. In fact, this novel result could eventually lead to the possibility of identifying the viral strain(s) responsible for the infection. Furthermore, it was possible to discriminate PPV-infected plants (symptomatic and asymptomatic leaves) from healthy plants and from plants infected by another plant pathogenic virus. These observations suggest the existence of a potential specific response to the sharka disease. Based on all these findings, the hypothesis that asymptomatic PPVinfected trees could be detected through virus-induced metabolic alterations is supported.Furthermore, the metabolic responses collected from asymptomatic leaves could be considered as early responses to PPV-infection, i.e., before the appearance of symptoms. In a second step, early metabolic alterations, before the appearance of sharka symptoms, were confirmed by a kinetic study, despite negative molecular tests (RT-qPCR). Our results indicate that early detection of PPVinfected plants by targeting metabolic responses in Prunus persica was a promising strategy. Finally,statistical correlations between the two studies were found. Although the cultivars showed significantly different metabolic profiles, some discriminant features were common between the different cultivars tested (GF-305, yellow nectarine, yellow peach) and also between the different stages of the virus infection (symptomatic and asymptomatic). Nevertheless, a co-infection of PPV and powdery mildew observed during the kinetic experiment under monitored conditions could alter the impact of PPV-infection. Consequently, a new kinetic study without co-infection, is ongoing to confirm or refute these first observations. In addition, the identification of biomarkers related to the sharka disease, also in progress, would provide a betterunderstanding of the metabolic interactions between peach and PPV. Finally, other experiments under natural conditions are underway to evaluate the robustness of our potential biomarkers
Hust, Michael. « Rekombinante Antikörper gegen die NIa-Protease des Plum pox virus ». [S.l.] : [s.n.], 2002. http://deposit.ddb.de/cgi-bin/dokserv?idn=966096886.
Юсько, Л. С. « Епідеміологія вірусу шарки сливи (plum pox virus) в Закарпатському регіоні ». Diss. de candidat en sciences biologiques, КНУТШ, 2009.
Marandel, Grégoire. « Organisation génomique de la résistance quantitative au Plum pox virus chez les Prunus ». Bordeaux 2, 2008. http://www.theses.fr/2008BOR21562.
The Plum pox virus (PPV), the causal agent of the sharka disease, is the most detrimental virus on stone-fruit trees, worldwide. Infected fruits are not marketable. To date, no peach cultivar is resistant. However sources of resistance have been identified and mapped in apricot and Prunus davidiana, a wild peach-related species. Several of the mapped QTL co-localize with candidate genes previously identified. Among them are the translation initiation factors. In this study, resistance in P. Davidiana was confirmed in an F2 population and two new QTL were identified. Quantitative analysis of the apricot cultivar 'Harlayne' resistance was also performed. A candidate gene strategy followed, including translation initiation factors elF4E, elF4G and their isoforms. Molecular markers targeting these genes were developped as a tool for marker-assisted selection. It revealed a striking co-localization with several resistance QTL identified in P. Davidiana and P. Armeniaca cv. 'Harlayne'. The implication od these genes in PPV resistance is discussed. In order to validate the consistency of these results with those previously published, data were merged in a QTL meta-analysis. It enabled to refine the boundaries of the genomic region controlling PPV resistance in both species, P. Davidiana and P. Armeniaca
Neumüller, Michael. « Die Hypersensibilität der Europäischen Pflaume (Prunus domestica L.) gegenüber dem Scharkavirus (Plum pox virus) ». [S.l. : s.n.], 2005. http://www.bsz-bw.de/cgi-bin/xvms.cgi?SWB12103718.
Livres sur le sujet "Plum pox virus (PPV)":
Chang, L. W. H. Pests not known to occur in the United States or of limited distribution. 88. Plum pox virus. 1987.
Chapitres de livres sur le sujet "Plum pox virus (PPV)":
Maiss, Edgar, Mark Varrelmann, Chris DiFonzo et Benjamin Raccah. « Risk Assessment of Transgenic Plants Expressing the Coat Protein Gene of Plum Pox Potyvirus (PPV) ». Dans Virus-Resistant Transgenic Plants : Potential Ecological Impact, 85–93. Berlin, Heidelberg : Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-03506-1_10.
Kölber, M., M. Németh, L. Krizbai, E. Kiss-Tóth et M. Kálmán. « Detection of Plum Pox Virus by Different Methods ». Dans Developments in Plant Pathology, 317–19. Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0043-1_67.
Scorza, Ralph, Ann Callahan, Michel Ravelonandro et Michael Braverman. « Development and Regulation of the Plum Pox Virus Resistant Transgenic Plum ‘HoneySweet’ ». Dans Regulation of Agricultural Biotechnology : The United States and Canada, 269–80. Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands, 2012. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-2156-2_12.
Tian, Lining, Shuocheng Zhang, H. J. I. P. ne SanfaHon, Antonet Svircev, Daniel C. Brown et Rui Wen. « PPV-Specific Hairpin RNAs is an Effective Method for Plum Pox Potyvirus Resistance ». Dans Biotechnology and Sustainable Agriculture 2006 and Beyond, 103–6. Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4020-6635-1_10.
Miletić, Nemanja, Darko Jevremović, Olga Mitrović, Olivera Gvozdenović, Marko Pajić et Svetlana Paunović. « Influence of Different Plum Pox Virus Strains on Chemical Composition of ‘Čačanska Lepotica’ Plum Fruit Cultivar ». Dans 30th Scientific-Experts Conference of Agriculture and Food Industry, 76–81. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-40049-1_9.
da Câmara Machado, Artur, Hermann Katinger et Margit Laimer da Câmara Machado. « Coat protein-mediated protection against plum pox virus in herbaceous model plants and transformation of apricot and plum ». Dans Developments in Plant Breeding, 349–54. Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands, 1994. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-011-0467-8_70.
Rubio, Manuel, Federico Dicenta et Pedro Martínez-Gómez. « Genomic Designing of New Almond-Peach Rootstock-Variety Combinations Resistant to Plum Pox Virus (Sharka) ». Dans Genomic Designing for Biotic Stress Resistant Fruit Crops, 275–86. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91802-6_6.
Polák, J. « The Role of Prunus Spinosa L. in Epidemiology of Plum Pox Virus in the Czech Republic ». Dans Developments in Plant Pathology, 527–30. Dordrecht : Springer Netherlands, 1997. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-0043-1_117.
Nicolás-Almansa, María, D. Ruiz, A. Guevara, J. Cos, Pedro Martínez-Gómez et Manuel Rubio. « Genomic Designing of New Plum Pox Virus Resistant Plumcot [Prunus Salicina Lindl. x Prunus Armeniaca L.] Varieties Through Interspecific Hybridization ». Dans Genomic Designing for Biotic Stress Resistant Fruit Crops, 287–304. Cham : Springer International Publishing, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-91802-6_7.
Butac, Madalina. « Plum Breeding ». Dans Prunus. IntechOpen, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.92432.
Actes de conférences sur le sujet "Plum pox virus (PPV)":
Shehu, Dhurata, Harallamb Paçe, Dritan Sadikaj et Ragip Elezaj. « DIAGNOSIS AND CONTROL OF PLUM POX VIRUS (PPV) ON PLUM AT THE DISTRICT OF TROPOJË, ALBANIA ». Dans The 4th International Virtual Conference on Advanced Scientific Results. Publishing Society, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.18638/scieconf.2016.4.1.356.
Trandafirescu, Marioara. « SELECTING APRICOT TREE GENITORS FOR THE OBTAINING OF NEW CULTIVARS RESISTANT TO THE PLUM POX VIRUS (PPV) ». Dans 15th International Multidisciplinary Scientific GeoConference SGEM2015. Stef92 Technology, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.5593/sgem2015/b61/s25.073.
Angelova, Liliya, Antoniy Stoev, Ekaterina Borisova et Latchezar Avramov. « Detection of plum pox virus infection in selection plum trees using spectral imaging ». Dans International Conference and School on Quantum Electronics "Laser Physics and Applications" - ICSQE 2016, sous la direction de Tanja Dreischuh, Sanka Gateva, Albena Daskalova et Alexandros Serafetinides. SPIE, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.2261807.
« Drought resistance in some Prunus persica (L.) Batsch cultivars damaged with Plum Pox Virus ». Dans Plant Genetics, Genomics, Bioinformatics, and Biotechnology. Institute of Cytology and Genetics, Siberian Branch of the Russian Academy of Sciences, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.18699/plantgen2019-034.