Articles de revues : « Social ecology »

1

Oishi, Shigehiro, et Jesse Graham. « Social Ecology ». Perspectives on Psychological Science 5, n^o 4 (juillet 2010) : 356–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1745691610374588.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

Résumé :

This article presents a socioecological approach (accounting for physical, societal, and interpersonal environments) to psychological theorizing and research. First, we demonstrate that economic systems, political systems, religious systems, climates, and geography exert a distal yet important influence on human mind and behavior. Second, we summarize the historical precedents of socioecological psychology. There have been several waves of ecological movements with distinct emphases in the history of psychological science, such as K. Lewin’s (1936, 1939) field theory and U. Bronfenbrenner’s (1977) ecological approach to human development. Environmental and community psychologies, created in the late 1960s and early 1970s, promoted social activism through basic and applied research on ecological factors and social outcomes. Most recently, the rise of cultural psychology has encouraged psychologists to pay attention to cultural factors in basic psychological processes, but note that less attention has been given to socioecological factors per se. We highlight the benefits of bringing the socioecological perspective back to mainstream psychological theorizing and research.

2

CARTER, ALAN. « DEEP ECOLOGY OR SOCIAL ECOLOGY ? » Heythrop Journal 36, n^o 3 (juillet 1995) : 328–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-2265.1995.tb00992.x.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

3

Clark, John. « A social ecology∗ ». Capitalism Nature Socialism 8, n^o 3 (septembre 1997) : 3–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10455759709358746.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

4

Lee, Joseph G. L., Robert Darby et Robert Van Howe. « Ecologic fallacy and the social ecology of circumcision ». Australian and New Zealand Journal of Public Health 36, n^o 3 (juin 2012) : 293–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1753-6405.2012.00875.x.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

5

Beerling, D. J., W. N. Adger et K. Brown. « Social Science Analyses Ecology ». Global Ecology and Biogeography Letters 5, n^o 1 (janvier 1996) : 55. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2997483.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

6

IZAWA, EI-ICHI. « Social ecology of corvids ». Japanese Journal of Animal Psychology 61, n^o 1 (2011) : 55–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.2502/janip.61.1.5.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

7

Lacy, Mark. « Social Ecology after Bookchin ». Environmental Ethics 23, n^o 1 (2001) : 81–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/enviroethics200123140.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

8

Gillen, Emily M., Kristen Hassmiller Lich, Karin B. Yeatts, Michelle L. Hernandez, Timothy W. Smith et Megan A. Lewis. « Social Ecology of Asthma ». Health Education & ; Behavior 41, n^o 1 (24 mai 2013) : 63–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1090198113486804.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

9

Boles, John Michael. « James Rorty's Social Ecology ». Organization & ; Environment 11, n^o 2 (juin 1998) : 155–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0921810698112002.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

10

NIEMANN, YOLANDA FLORES, et PAUL F. SECORD. « Social Ecology of Stereotyping ». Journal for the Theory of Social Behaviour 25, n^o 1 (mars 1995) : 1–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5914.1995.tb00263.x.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

11

Cole, Daniel. « Heidegger and Social Ecology ». Stance : An International Undergraduate Philosophy Journal 1 (2008) : 32–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/stance200816.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

12

Cole, Daniel. « Heidegger and Social Ecology ». Stance : an international undergraduate philosophy journal 1, n^o 1 (6 septembre 2019) : 32–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.33043/s.1.1.32-37.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

Résumé :

In this essay I defend Heidegger’s critique of technology against possible criticisms that he may be an anti-humanist and a mystic. This essay will show that Heidegger’s critique of technology is helpful in thinking about ecological questions; and his contributions to such questions is relevant and not radically separated from some of the work of other philosophers today including Karen Warren and Marilyn Frye.

13

Bahns, Angela J., Kate M. Pickett et Christian S. Crandall. « Social ecology of similarity ». Group Processes & ; Intergroup Relations 15, n^o 1 (12 juillet 2011) : 119–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1368430211410751.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

14

Gerken, Mikkel, Jesper Kallestrup, Klemens Kappel et Duncan Pritchard. « Introduction : Social Cognitive Ecology and Its Role in Social Epistemology ». Episteme 8, n^o 1 (février 2011) : 1–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/epi.2011.0002.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

Résumé :

The articles in this special issue were selected from the 2010 Episteme conference, “Cognitive Ecology: The Role of the Concept of Knowledge in Our Social Cognitive Ecology”, which took place at the University of Edinburgh in June 2010. The overarching purpose of the conference was to explore our epistemic concepts – and the concept of knowledge in particular – from the perspective offered by a social cognitive ecology.

15

McIntosh, Robert P. « The Social Dimension of Ecology ». Ecology 74, n^o 8 (décembre 1993) : 2475. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1939606.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

16

Julesz, Máté. « Environmental health and social ecology ». Orvosi Hetilap 152, n^o 49 (décembre 2011) : 1962–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/oh.2011.29258.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

17

Smith, Andrew T. « Marmot Social Behavior and Ecology ». Ecology 72, n^o 2 (avril 1991) : 765–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2937226.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

18

Unnever, James D., J. M. Byrne et R. J. Sampson. « The Social Ecology of Crime ». Contemporary Sociology 16, n^o 6 (novembre 1987) : 845. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2071575.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

19

Davis, David E., et David P. Barash. « Marmots : Social Behavior and Ecology ». Journal of Wildlife Management 54, n^o 4 (octobre 1990) : 685. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3809374.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

20

Sullivan, Walter F. « Catholic Social Teaching and Ecology ». Journal of Catholic Social Thought 4, n^o 2 (2007) : 203–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/jcathsoc20074211.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

21

Lowe, Philip, Geoff Whitman et Jeremy Phillipson. « Ecology and the social sciences ». Journal of Applied Ecology 46, n^o 2 (avril 2009) : 297–305. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2664.2009.01621.x.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

22

YAMAOKA, Ryohei. « Chemical ecology of social insects. » Journal of the agricultural chemical society of Japan 64, n^o 11 (1990) : 1749–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.1271/nogeikagaku1924.64.1749.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

23

Clutton-Brock, T. H., et Paul H. Harvey. « Primate ecology and social organization ». Journal of Zoology 183, n^o 1 (20 août 2009) : 1–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1469-7998.1977.tb04171.x.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

24

Ghiglieri, Michael P. « The Social Ecology of Chimpanzees ». Scientific American 252, n^o 6 (juin 1985) : 102–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/scientificamerican0685-102.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

25

Davis, Richard. « Towards a Christian Social Ecology ». Pacifica : Australasian Theological Studies 13, n^o 2 (juin 2000) : 181–201. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1030570x0001300205.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

Résumé :

Solutions to the environmental crisis depend on an understanding of its cause. This paper examines the social ecology of Murray Bookchin, who argues that our ecological crisis, seen in the domination of nature by human beings, has its roots in the domination of human by human. Social ecology, which emphasises these social causes, is at odds with much ecotheology, which finds the causes in overpopulation, technology, consumerism and Christianity itself. The differences between these approaches are illustrated with the examples drawn from New Zealand and Australian authors. The author advocates Christianising Bookchin's social ecology, using various theological motifs, but without slipping into an individualistic eco-spiritualism, which avoids the difficult social questions social ecology raises.

26

Gillett, Grant. « Language, social ecology and experience ». International Studies in the Philosophy of Science 5, n^o 3 (janvier 1991) : 195–203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/02698599108573393.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

27

Kovel, Joel, Kate Soper, Mary Mellor et John Clark. « John Clark's “A social ecology” ». Capitalism Nature Socialism 9, n^o 1 (mars 1998) : 25–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10455759809358774.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

28

Hutton, Drew. « Social ecology and environmental education ». Australian Journal of Environmental Education 2 (juin 1986) : 11–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s081406260000433x.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

Résumé :

AbstractA world view is emerging in areas like peace education, environmental education, justice education and development education which cannot be understood simply by applying old assumptions to these areas. This world view involves a different ethical framework, a different epistemology and a different way of functioning in order to achieve goals. I call this new world view social ecology, a philosophy which has emerged as a result of the threats to our planet and which takes as its starting point such principles as ecological sustainability, non-violence, grass-roots democracy and social equality.

29

Pontikes, Elizabeth, et Michael Hannan. « An Ecology of Social Categories ». Sociological Science 1 (2014) : 311–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.15195/v1.a20.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

30

Thomas, James C., Michele Clark, Jadis Robinson, Martha Monnett, Peter H. Kilmarx et Thomas A. Peterman. « The social ecology of syphilis ». Social Science & ; Medicine 48, n^o 8 (avril 1999) : 1081–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0277-9536(98)00408-0.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

31

Owen, Connor. « Social Ecology and Aesthetic Criticism ». Studies in Arts and Humanities 2, n^o 2 (15 décembre 2016) : 32–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.18193/sah.v2i2.78.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

32

Chivers, David J., et H. O. Box. « Primate Behaviour and Social Ecology ». Journal of Animal Ecology 55, n^o 1 (février 1986) : 395. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4717.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

33

Lejano, Raul P., et Daniel Stokols. « Social ecology, sustainability, and economics ». Ecological Economics 89 (mai 2013) : 1–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolecon.2013.01.011.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

34

Macdonald, David W. « The ecology of social behaviour ». Trends in Ecology & ; Evolution 4, n^o 2 (février 1989) : 60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0169-5347(89)90147-x.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

35

Dunbar, R. I. M. « Primate behaviour and social ecology ». Behavioural Processes 11, n^o 2 (août 1985) : 221–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/0376-6357(85)90066-x.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

36

Zuzanek, Jiri, et Marlene Lee. « Social ecology of art audiences ». Journal of Cultural Economics 9, n^o 1 (juin 1985) : 65–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf02267488.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

37

Recalcatti de Andrade, Aline. « Contribuições de Marx sobre a relação sociedade-natureza e o imperialismo ecológico na América Latina ». AMBIENTES : Revista de Geografia e Ecologia Política 4, n^o 1 (30 juin 2022) : 128–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.48075/amb.v4i1.28184.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

Résumé :

A Ecologia Política é um campo de estudos que possui uma contextualização histórica e se divide em correntes teóricas e discussões epistemológicas. Uma dessas vertentes é a ecologia marxista, que se baseia no pensamento de Marx e Engels e utiliza o método do materialismo histórico para analisar a questão da natureza. Assim, o presente trabalho busca entender as contribuições mais elementares da ecologia marxista para o campo da ecologia política latino-americana, através do enfoque sobre a relação entre sociedade-natureza, interpretada teoricamente pelos ecologistas marxistas das teses de Marx e o conceito de imperialismo ecológico, que na realidade concreta, possui um forte papel na dominação da natureza na América Latina. O artigo estrutura-se em uma inicial explicação sobre as principais contribuições do pensamento de Marx, como o conceito de metabolismo social, que se refere a sua concepção da relação entre a natureza e o ser humano e sua “fratura” no modo de produção capitalista, essencial para entender o funcionamento do capitalismo sobre a exploração da natureza. Nesse trabalho, o principal objetivo é apontar quais são os conceitos mais centrais que o pensamento marxista, através da sua interpretação dos textos marxianos focados na ecologia, pode agregar à questão ecológica na América Latina. Por isso, em seguida se insere ao debate a concepção de imperialismo ecológico, sendo uma das questões que mais afeta os países do Sul Global, portanto central para a argumentação, para, assim, trazer o diálogo entre a ecologia política latino-americana e as leituras da ecologia marxista das contribuições de Marx. O artigo se classifica como uma pesquisa teórica e adota-se como pressuposto que a ecologia pode ser uma importante ferramenta social e política, que tem a potencialidade de atuar como força política emancipatória. Palavras-chave: Ecologia marxista; Relação sociedade-natureza; América Latina; Imperialismo ecológico. Contributions by Marx on the society-nature relation and the ecological imperialism in Latin America Abstract Political ecology is a field of study that is historically contextualized and is divided into theoretical currents and epistemological discussions. One of them is Marxist ecology, which is based on Marx’s and Engels’s thought and uses the method of historical materialism to analyze the issue of nature. Thus, aim of this paper is to understand the main contributions of Marxist ecology to Latin American political ecology by focusing on the relations between society and nature, theoretically interpreted by Marxist ecologists on Marx’s thesis and the concept of ecological imperialism, analyzed by Marxist ecology authors, which in concrete reality has a strong role in the domination of nature in Latin America. The article is structured in an initial explanation of the main contributions of Marx's thought, as the concept of social metabolism refers to his conception of the relations between nature and the human being, and its “fracture” in the capitalist production mode, essential to understand the functioning of capitalism on the exploitation of nature. In this academic work, the main objective is to point out what are the most central concepts that the Marxist thought, by its interpretation of the Marxian work focused on ecology, can contribute to the ecological issue in Latin America. For this reason, the concept of ecological imperialism is added to the debate, as one of the issues that most affect the countries of the Global South, therefore central to the argument, to make a correlation between Latin America political ecology and the reading of Marxist ecology from Marx’s contributions. The article is classified as theoretical research and it is assumed that ecology can be an important social and political tool, which has the potential to act as an emancipatory political force. Keywords: Marxist Ecology; Society-nature relation; Latin America; Ecological Imperialism. Contribuciones de Marx sobre la relación sociedad-naturaleza y el imperialismo ecológico en Latinoamérica La Ecología Política es un campo de estudios que tiene una contextualización histórica y se separa en corrientes teóricas y debates epistemológicas. Una de estas vertientes es la ecología marxista, que se basa en el pensamiento de Marx y Engels y utiliza el método del materialismo histórico para analizar la cuestión de la naturaleza. Así, el presente trabajo busca comprender los aportes más elementares de la ecología marxista al campo de la ecología política latinoamericana, a través del enfoque sobre la relación entre sociedad-naturaleza interpretada teóricamente por los ecologistas marxistas de las tesis de Marx y el concepto de imperialismo ecológico, que, en la realidad concreta, tiene un fuerte papel en el dominio de la naturaleza en América Latina. El artículo se estructura en una inicial explicación de los principales aportes del pensamiento de Marx, como el concepto de metabolismo social, que se refiere a la relación entre la naturaleza y el ser humano y su “fractura” en el modo de producción capitalista, fundamental para comprender el funcionamiento del capitalismo sobre la explotación de la naturaleza. En este trabajo, el objetivo principal es señalar cuales son los conceptos más centrales que el pensamiento marxista, desde su interpretación de los textos marxianos con enfoque en la ecología, puede añadir cuestión ecológica en Latinoamérica. Por ello, luego se suma al debate la concepción de imperialismo ecológico, que es uno de los temas que más afecta a los países del Sur Global, por lo tanto, central para la argumentación, para, así, aportar el diálogo entre la ecología política latinoamericana y las lecturas desde la ecología marxista a partir de las contribuciones de Marx. El artículo se clasifica como una investigación teórica y se asume que la ecología puede ser una importante herramienta social y política, que tiene el potencial de actuar como una fuerza política emancipadora. Palabras Clave: Ecología Marxista; Relación sociedad-naturaleza; Latinoamérica; Imperialismo Ecológico.

38

PUTSCHE, LAURA. « Political Ecology across Spaces, Scales, and Social Groups:Political Ecology across Spaces, Scales, and Social Groups ». American Anthropologist 108, n^o 3 (septembre 2006) : 607–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/aa.2006.108.3.607.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

39

Maton, Kenneth I. « Making a Difference : The Social Ecology of Social Transformation ». American Journal of Community Psychology 28, n^o 1 (février 2000) : 25–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1023/a:1005190312887.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

40

West, Meredith, Andrew King et Gregory Kohn. « Developmental ecology ». Interaction Studies 12, n^o 2 (21 juillet 2011) : 351–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/is.12.2.08wes.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

Résumé :

In this article we provide a case history of the development of a communicative system in songbirds. In particular, we explore how brown-headed cowbirds, male and female, cooperate in the development and use of species-typical song. The goal is to show how social interactions between and within sexes create a platform for the production and perception of song. We consider six perspectives. First, we discuss the nature of the acoustic signal. Second, we look at the process of song learning. Third, we describe a specific song mechanism, social shaping. Fourth, we look at the more general developmental process of neophenogenesis. Fifth, we consider the developmental ecology for social learning. Finally, we describe how social networks measures can be used to capture the nature of social interactions as the engines of song learning. Taken as a whole, we argue that culturally transmitted behaviors structure social interactions that predict the acquisition of species' typical behaviors necessary for successful reproduction.

41

Humphrey, Mathew. « ‘Nature’ in deep ecology and social ecology : Contesting the core ». Journal of Political Ideologies 5, n^o 2 (juin 2000) : 247–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/713682940.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

42

Sluyter, Andrew. « Blaut's Early Natural/Social Theorization, Cultural Ecology, and Political Ecology ». Antipode 37, n^o 5 (novembre 2005) : 963–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.0066-4812.2005.00545.x.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

43

Breed, Michael D., et Thomas D. Seeley. « Behavioral Ecology of a Social Insect ». Evolution 40, n^o 6 (novembre 1986) : 1358. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2408965.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

44

Conner, William E., et Thomas Seeley. « Ecology of Social Life--In Honeybees ». Ecology 67, n^o 4 (août 1986) : 1106. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1939837.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

45

Conner, William E. « Ecology of Social Life--In Honeybees ». Ecology 67, n^o 4 (août 1986) : 1107–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1939838.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

46

Julesz, Máté. « Social ecology from a salutogenetic aspect ». Orvosi Hetilap 151, n^o 52 (1 décembre 2010) : 2154–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/oh.2010.ho2317.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

47

Conner, William E. « Ecology of Social Life—In Honeybees ». Ecology 67, n^o 4 (août 1986) : 1106–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1939836a.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

48

KANE, ROBERT J. « THE SOCIAL ECOLOGY OF POLICE MISCONDUCT* ». Criminology 40, n^o 4 (novembre 2002) : 867–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-9125.2002.tb00976.x.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

49

Sobol, James J. « The social ecology of police attitudes ». Policing : An International Journal of Police Strategies & ; Management 33, n^o 2 (juin 2010) : 253–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/13639511011044876.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

50

Kramer, Kathryn D., et Kermit B. Nash. « The Unique Social Ecology of Groups ». Social Work with Groups 18, n^o 1 (30 juin 1995) : 55–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1300/j009v18n01_06.

Texte intégral

Styles APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, etc.

Articles de revues sur le sujet « Social ecology »

Créez une référence correcte selon les styles APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard et plusieurs autres