Segui questo link per vedere altri tipi di pubblicazioni sul tema: Bunjevci.
Articoli di riviste sul tema "Bunjevci"
Cita una fonte nei formati APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard e in molti altri stili
Vedi i top-23 articoli di riviste per l'attività di ricerca sul tema "Bunjevci".
Accanto a ogni fonte nell'elenco di riferimenti c'è un pulsante "Aggiungi alla bibliografia". Premilo e genereremo automaticamente la citazione bibliografica dell'opera scelta nello stile citazionale di cui hai bisogno: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver ecc.
Puoi anche scaricare il testo completo della pubblicazione scientifica nel formato .pdf e leggere online l'abstract (il sommario) dell'opera se è presente nei metadati.
Vedi gli articoli di riviste di molte aree scientifiche e compila una bibliografia corretta.
1
Weaver, Eric. "Hungarian views of the Bunjevci in Habsburg times and the inter-war period". Balcanica, n. 42 (2011): 77–115. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/balc1142077w.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
The status and image of minorities often depends not on their self-perceptions, but on the official stance taken by the state in which they live. While identity is commonly recognized as malleable and personal, the official status of minorities is couched in stiff scientific language claiming to be authoritative. But as polities change, these supposedly scientific categorizations of minorities also change. Based on academic reports and parliamentary decisions, in Hungary today the Catholic South Slavs known as Bunjevci are officially regarded as an obscure branch of the Croatian nation. This has not always been the case. Early records of the Bunjevci categorized them in a variety of ways, most commonly as Catholic Serbs, Dalmatians, and Illyrians. In the nineteenth century Bunjevac elites were able to project to the Hungarian public a mythological positive historical image of the Bunjevci, delineating them from the negative stereotypes of other South Slavs. This positive image, fixed in encyclopaedias and maintained until the Second World War, represented the Bunjevci as Catholic Serbs who (unlike Croats or Orthodox Serbs) were constantly faithful to the Hungarian state and eager to assimilate. In the 1920s and 1930s traditional Hungarian stereotypes of Bunjevci protected them from abuses suffered by other South Slavs. As political relations transformed, official views of the Bunjevci also changed. With the massive upheaval during and after the Second World War, there was a change in accounts of who the Bunjevci were. The transformation from communism and the break-up of Yugoslavia have also evoked demands for changes in identity from some Bunjevci, and brought new impositions of identity upon them.
2
Raduški, Nada. "Bunjevci in Serbia: Croats, Serbs or specific ethnic community?" Politička revija 75, n. 1 (2023): 45–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.5937/polrev75-43190.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
The paper analyzes the ethno-demographic, identity and political development of the people of Bunjevci in Serbia. Numerous theories of ethnologists, historians, linguists and sociologists of religion about the origin, language and religion of the people of Bunjevci were presented, as well as the ethnopolitical development of the Bunjevci people, throughout history until today, by confronting different attitudes and answers to the question: are the Bunjevci more Serbs, Croats or a specific national community? The importance of national self-identification, i.e. the free declaration of the people of Bunjevci about their own national identity and the impact of changes during the census declaration on their population development, was highlighted. Viewed over time, the political development of the Bunjevci national minority in Serbia is characterized by turbulent changes, from denial to recognition of their national and cultural distinctiveness, the struggle not to assimilate into either the Croatian or the Serbian nation, which became a feature of their identity and preserved this ethnic community until today. Predictions are that the Bunjevac national minority in Serbia, without the formation of a modern socio-economic structure and cultural-political institutions, is in danger of disappearing by the end of the 21st century, like all other small linguistic communities, according to the opinion of many domestic and international expert. For the survival, demographic and cultural development of Bunjevci as a modern ethnic community, activities that contribute to the integration of the Bunjevci people and establish equal relations with all other ethnic communities, as well as with the wider socio-political environment, are necessary. For Bunjevci, as a long-disenfranchised and "erased" national community, the affirmation of one's own ethnic, linguistic and cultural identity is an important prerequisite for achieving equality and social integration as a special minority community. This primarily refers to the contestation and appropriation of everything that belongs to the Bunjevci by the Croatian national community in Vojvodina, as well as efforts to assimilate into the borders of Serbian culture and history. However, the accepted principles of multiculturalism in Serbia form the basis and guarantee for the affirmation of the Bunjevci people as a small nation and a chance for their overall faster development, for the preservation and improvement of all components of their ethnic identity, as well as full equality, both with the majority people and with all other nationalities in Serbia.
3
Iršević, Sandra. "Bunjevke kroz istoriju književnosti i umetnosti / Bunjevke through the History of Art and Literature". AM Journal of Art and Media Studies, n. 11 (15 novembre 2016): 93–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.25038/am.v0i11.150.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
This research includes well known women writers, visual artists, humanitarians, professors who declared themselves as a Bunjevke. It is about Mari Đorđević Malagurski, Kati Prčić, Ani Beslic, Angeli Mačković, Jeleni Covic, Gabrieli Diklić, Suzani Kujundzic Ostojic, Alisi Prčić, Ani Vukov and Veri Korponajić. The goal of this research is to show how the history changed position of a Bunjevci and Bunjevke, as well as their identity and ethnicity.
4
Kapusta, Armina. "Buniewcy i ich kultura w przestrzeni miejskiej Suboticy – analiza semiotyczna". Prace i Studia Geograficzne 67, n. 4 (20 febbraio 2022): 107–26. http://dx.doi.org/10.48128/pisg/2022-67.4-06.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
Bunjevci are an ethnic group whose status as a national minority has changed depending on the policy pursued in the regions they live in, which significantly influenced the possibility of marking their presence in space. The aim of the article is to find and present signs proving the presence of Bunjevci in Subotica. The focus was on urban names, institutions, monuments, and other signs enabling permanent or periodic appropriation of space. The semiotic analysis of the space of Subotica, the informal capital of Bunjevci, was preceded by a detailed description of this group. The knowledge of Bunjevci history, traditions, language, institutions, and other elements of heritage made it possible to identify signs that can be manifested in the urban space.
5
Horvat, Aleksandar. "Ethnic identity of the Bunjevci from Backa in the population censuses: 1850-2011". Zbornik Matice srpske za drustvene nauke, n. 184 (2022): 553–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/zmsdn2284553h.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
The aim of this paper is the analysis of different forms and transfor?mations in defining and declaring the ethnic identity of the people of Bunjevci from Backa in the population census in the territory of today?s Vojvodina in the period from 1850 to 2011, as well as the circumstances that influenced the modalities of expressing their ethnicity in different state frameworks - first in the Kingdom of Hungary, then in the Kingdom of Yugoslavia and socialist Yugoslavia, and finally in the Republic of Serbia. The subject of the research is the official results of certain censuses, along with the analysis of political, social and cultural-educational factors that were of the importance to the people of Bunjevci when declaring their ethnic affiliation. Also, the paper analyzes the historical context and social relations that had a decisive influence on the transformations in the declaration of ethnic identity, including various national integration processes in the area of Backa. As a consequence of the intersection of different integration models within one population, two forms of identity were shaped and the ethno-national duality of the Bunjevci and Bunjevci-Croats is present to this day. Analyzing the ethnic identity of the Bunjevci through the official results of the population census contributes not only to better under?standing of the complexity of the process of building awareness of one?s own identity, but also of the specificity of the case of the Bunjevci, who are still the subject of conflicting and mutually opposing interpretations in scientific and public discourse.
6
Mohai, Aletta. "Karagity Antal „identitásnevelő” drámái és prózája". Theatron 15, n. 3 (2021): 38–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.55502/the.2021.3.38.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
My paper examines the plays and prose of the Hungarian Bunjevci author Antal Karagity. The writings of Karagity encourage his people to claim their Bunjevci ethnic identity and live their lives maintaining their traditions even confronted with the threats of an oppressive system. The goal of this paper is to begin processing the author’s prose and plays, and by mapping the topic, connect the author to the wider literary discourse of Hungarian ethnic minorities.
7
Punczman, Eszter. "Bunjevci u Mađarskoj: postmoderni heterogeni identiteti". Studia ethnologica Croatica 31 (2019): 219–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.17234/sec.31.8.
Testo completo
8
Todosijević, Bojan. "WHY BUNJEVCI DID NOT BECOME A NATION". East Central Europe 29, n. 1-2 (2002): 59–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/187633002x00046.
Testo completo
9
Мартынова, М. Ю. "БУНЬЕВЦЫ В ПАРАДИГМЕ СВОЕЙ ИДЕНТИЧНОСТИ". Вестник антропологии (Herald of Anthropology), n. 3 (1 ottobre 2021): 70–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.33876/2311-0546/2021-3/70-87.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
В статье рассматривается проблема идентичности буньевцев, южнославянской этнической группы, представители которой проживают в нескольких государствах: боснии и Герцеговине, венгрии, Сербии и Хорватии. Их статус спорен, неодинаково трактуется в разные исторические периоды и по разные стороны государственных границ. Часть буньевцев относит себя к хорватам, другая – отстаивает свою самобытность. Автор задается вопросами, где та грань, которая позволяет сообществу считать себя отдельным народом, как воздействуют «внешние» обстоятельства на жизнеспособность этнических групп? Ответы на эти вопросы всегда имеют не только научную обоснованность, но и политическую аргументацию. В этом нас убеждает ситуация с буньевцами. Дискуссии об их происхождении вспыхнули с новой силой после распада СФРЮ и возникновения независимых государств на Балканах. Они стали наглядным примером того, как осмысливается, мифологизируется и используется прошлое в зависимости от контекста и общественной ситуации. Сегодня в процессе конструирования этнических идентичностей используются разные ресурсы, в т.ч. язык, религия, историческая память, политический дискурс и т.д. В более широком, антропологическом контексте тема имеет теоретическую значимость в противостоянии конструктивистов и примордиалистов The article studies the identity of the Bunjevci, a South Slavic ethnic group living in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Hungary, Serbia, and Croatia. Their status is controversial, and its interpretation depends on the historical period and the country. Some Bunjevci consider themselves Croats, while others defend their unique identity. The author wonders where the borderline that allows a community to consider itself a separate people is and how "external" circumstances affect the viability of ethnic groups? The answers to these questions are usually not only scientifically based but also have political reasoning. The Bunjevci case is a typical example. Discussions about their origin broke out with renewed vigor after the collapse of the SFRY and the emergence of independent states. They have become a clear example of how the past is interpreted, mythologized, and used depending on the context and social situation. Today, various resources are used to construct ethnic identities, including language, religion, historical memory, political discourse, etc. In a broader anthropological context, the topic has a theoretical significance for the discussion of constructivists and primordialists.
10
Мартынова, М. Ю. "БУНЬЕВЦЫ В ПАРАДИГМЕ СВОЕЙ ИДЕНТИЧНОСТИ". Вестник антропологии (Herald of Anthropology), n. 3 (1 ottobre 2021): 70–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.33876/2311-0546/2021-3/70-87.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
В статье рассматривается проблема идентичности буньевцев, южнославянской этнической группы, представители которой проживают в нескольких государствах: боснии и Герцеговине, венгрии, Сербии и Хорватии. Их статус спорен, неодинаково трактуется в разные исторические периоды и по разные стороны государственных границ. Часть буньевцев относит себя к хорватам, другая – отстаивает свою самобытность. Автор задается вопросами, где та грань, которая позволяет сообществу считать себя отдельным народом, как воздействуют «внешние» обстоятельства на жизнеспособность этнических групп? Ответы на эти вопросы всегда имеют не только научную обоснованность, но и политическую аргументацию. В этом нас убеждает ситуация с буньевцами. Дискуссии об их происхождении вспыхнули с новой силой после распада СФРЮ и возникновения независимых государств на Балканах. Они стали наглядным примером того, как осмысливается, мифологизируется и используется прошлое в зависимости от контекста и общественной ситуации. Сегодня в процессе конструирования этнических идентичностей используются разные ресурсы, в т.ч. язык, религия, историческая память, политический дискурс и т.д. В более широком, антропологическом контексте тема имеет теоретическую значимость в противостоянии конструктивистов и примордиалистов The article studies the identity of the Bunjevci, a South Slavic ethnic group living in Bosnia and Herzegovina, Hungary, Serbia, and Croatia. Their status is controversial, and its interpretation depends on the historical period and the country. Some Bunjevci consider themselves Croats, while others defend their unique identity. The author wonders where the borderline that allows a community to consider itself a separate people is and how "external" circumstances affect the viability of ethnic groups? The answers to these questions are usually not only scientifically based but also have political reasoning. The Bunjevci case is a typical example. Discussions about their origin broke out with renewed vigor after the collapse of the SFRY and the emergence of independent states. They have become a clear example of how the past is interpreted, mythologized, and used depending on the context and social situation. Today, various resources are used to construct ethnic identities, including language, religion, historical memory, political discourse, etc. In a broader anthropological context, the topic has a theoretical significance for the discussion of constructivists and primordialists.
11
Šumonja, Miloš, e Ankica Vučković. "The Bunjevci question in the light of contemporary understandings of the nation". Kultura, n. 174-175 (2022): 213–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.5937/kultura2275213s.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
This paper analyzes the theoretical framework of the discussion on the national identity of the Bačka Bunjevci. Based on the insight into the main currents within contemporary studies of nations and nationalism, and conceptual analysis of scientific papers that problematize the opening of the ˮBunjevci questionˮ after the breakup of socialist Yugoslavia, we conclude: a) that standard arguments of all parties assume that modern nations have identifiable roots deep in the past; b) that the ˮBunjevci questionˮ shows the opposite, that there are no objective or ˮscientificˮ criteria of a national identity, especially alternative narratives about it; and c) that the ˮBunjevci questionˮ, just like any other national question, is essentially political, that is a question about the collective strategy of a community's survival in the given historical circumstances.
12
Černelić, Milana, e Tihana Rubić. "Characteristic features of the zadruga (extended family) of the Croatian subethnic group of Bunjevci". Acta Ethnographica Hungarica 61, n. 2 (dicembre 2016): 443–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/022.2016.61.2.12.
Testo completo
13
Černelić, Milana. "The Role of Ritual Traditional Clothing among Bunjevci Croats in Serbia in the Revitalisation of Annual Customs and Rituals". Folklore: Electronic Journal of Folklore 66 (dicembre 2016): 59–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.7592/fejf2016.66.cernelic.
Testo completo
14
Markovic, Sasa, e Snezana Besermenji. "Relation of the Serbian cultural club related to the structure of the population of Vojvodina". Zbornik Matice srpske za drustvene nauke, n. 131 (2010): 329–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/zmsdn1031329m.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
The Serbian Cultural Club is an organization founded in mid-January 1937. The Club pretended to be an non-party entity with the idea of cultural renaissance and broader national homogenization of the Serbian nation in The Kingdom of Yugoslavia, as an answer to the tendency for the political division of the country according to the national basis which was realized by the Cvetkovic-Macek Agreement from August 26, 1939. On the basis of that Agreement, formation of the Banat of Croatia started the division of the territories and federalization of the country along the ethnic principle. Since the borders between the constitutional nations of Yugoslavia were not clear in the territory and the theoretical pretensions were very conflicting. The Serbian Cultural Club tried to answer the challenge of the newly created situation. Its activity was specially visible in Vojvodina, having in mind the structure of the population, and there was also a numerous, nationally still not completely determined group of the Bunjevci and Sokci population. In an attempt to define their attitude to Vojvodina, intellectuals from The Serbian Cultural Club discussed all 'burning' issues related to the structure of the population, too. This paper would deal with his interesting and controversial topic. .
15
Petrovic, Ilija. "O POREKLU BUNJEVACA". Politička revija 68, n. 2/2021 (16 agosto 2021): 351–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.22182/pr.6822021.17.
Testo completo
16
Subotić, Momčilo. "NACIONALNI IDENTITET U PROCESU GLOBALIZACIJE – primer Bunjevaca". Politička revija 27, n. 1 (2011): 67–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.22182/pr.2712011.4.
Testo completo
17
Levy, Michele. "Fatherland: A Family History by Nina Bunjevac". World Literature Today 89, n. 5 (2015): 74–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/wlt.2015.0143.
Testo completo
18
Bačić, Slaven. "Osobitosti koncepcije biografskih članaka u Leksikonu podunavskih Hrvata – Bunjevaca i Šokaca". Studia lexicographica 15, n. 29 (17 dicembre 2021): 129–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.33604/sl.15.29.7.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
Velik dio Leksikona podunavskih Hrvata – Bunjevaca i Šokaca, prvoga leksikografskoga projekta hrvatske manjine izvan matične domovine, koji izlazi u Subotici od 2004. godine, čine biografski članci. Specifičnost ovoga leksikona, kao svojevrsnoga regionalnoga leksikona, uvjetovala je pristup istraživanju i prezentaciji biografija koji se donekle razlikuju od biografskih uzusa leksikografske obrade na nacionalnoj razini. U radu se navode najvažnije osobitosti koncepcije biografskih članaka u Leksikonu te ih obrazlaže. Riječ je ponajprije o imenima roditelja ulaznika, odnosno osoba koje se obrađuju, zatim kako se kroz životni put, rad ili znanstveni interes reflektira njihova povezanost sa zavičajem, a katkada o tome svjedoči i mjesto gdje su pokopane. Posebno se naglašavaju razlozi zašto je prilikom odabira ulaznika u Leksikon prihvaćeno načelo etničkoga podrijetla, a ne nacionalnoga osjećaja, te se objašnjava drugačija koncepcija biografija Hrvata iz Hrvatske u odnosu na podunavske Hrvate, zemljopisno omeđene područjem predmeta Leksikona (međuriječje Dunava i Tise). Upućuje se i na važnost uključivanja biografija pripadnika drugih naroda (Mađara, Srba) i metodološko koncipiranje tih članaka. Također se obrazlažu načelno nepostojanje donje dobne granice za uvrštavanje u Leksikon, različita koncepcija obrade povijesnih ličnosti i suvremenika te još neke osobitosti.
19
Iršević, Sandra. "Serbian and Bunjevac charities in Subotica in the 19th and 20th centuries". Bastina, n. 50 (2020): 343–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.5937/bastina30-25459.
Testo completo
20
Hodges, Andrew. "Producing and Maintaining Minority “Groupness” through State Effects: Teaching in Croatian in Serbia". Nationalities Papers 47, n. 1 (27 novembre 2018): 55–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/nps.2018.12.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
AbstractThis article ethnographically examines the situation surrounding the teaching of Croatian in Serbia. It analyzes the discourses and efforts of minority activists in promoting Croatian culture and language in various ways, specifically drawing on fieldwork conducted in a school where three mutually intelligible language varieties—Serbian, Croatian, and Bunjevac—were taught. Instruction in Croatian has been offered in Serbia since 2002 through a minority rights framework. However, prior to the wars of Yugoslav succession in the 1990s, those identifying as Croat were not considered a minority in [the] Socialist Yugoslavia, as it was a South Slavic federation. The number of children enrolling in Croatian minority programs in Serbia is small, and of those who attend them, a significant number do not come to identify as Croatian, a fact that many minority activists consider to be a problem. The article is organized in four parts. First, the context and various perspectives are introduced through an ethnographic vignette. Second, the research context and legal and institutional framework are introduced. Activist perspectives are then discussed, including tensions present. Finally, Michel-Rolph Trouillot’s concept of “state effects” is presented and elaborated with respect to the case study, and the various efforts of activists in trying to promote and/or maintain Croatian “groupness” are evaluated.
21
Cirkovic, Svetlana. "The discourse of instructions - between cognitive and anthropological linguistics". Juznoslovenski filolog, n. 70 (2014): 207–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/jfi1470207c.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
In this paper, the discourse of instructions corpus (DIC), composed of Bunjevac speech, Kosovo-Resava and Prizren-Timok dialects, spoken in a wide area in Serbia, was applied theoretical and methodological approaches common to anthropological and cognitive linguistics in order to demonstrate the mechanism according to which giving instructions functions in a specific oral speech. Based on the analysis of DIC, we came to the conclusion that instructions are given in cases of describing situations which involve an established sequence of events (or actions) that must be followed, and which contains elements of iterations (repeatability), which excludes giving instructions for unique and individual events and actions, such as biographical stories, historical events, personal and family history and so on. Taking into account this analysis, the thematic inventory of instructions proved to be significantly larger in relation to the inventory of instructions which the linguists have dealt with so far. The analysis of examples from DIC showed that the typical linguistic means for giving instructions is the second person singular of the present tense, which indicates the speaker?s awareness of the existence of the recipient (researchers) of the research situation, which does not mean that the researcher is also the recipient of instructions given in field interviews.
22
Aparicio González, María Jesús. "“Ser y valer”: Tres retratos de la diáspora femenina plasmados en la novela gráfica por mujeres artistas". Historia y Comunicación Social 25, n. 2 (27 ottobre 2020): 415–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.5209/hics.72273.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
En este estudio se han analizado tres novelas gráficas: La Perdida de Jessica Abel, Pérsepolis de Marjane Satrapi y Patria de Nina Bunjevac, publicadas durante el periodo comprendido entre los años 2002-2015, con el objetivo de señalar como desde la identidad femenina a partir de esta manifestación plástica multidisciplinar contemporánea se describen acontecimientos complejos y desgraciados de la historia del tiempo presente cómo son: el desarraigo, el exilio, el racismo y la indefensión.
Desde el análisis de contenido demostraremos la importancia que tienen las novelas gráficas referidas como documento histórico. Narradas desde la experiencia personal de las aludidas autoras-dibujantes y a la par migrantes voluntarias e involuntarias de nacionalidades tan dispares como la norteamericana, iraní, y europea del este, contextualizándolo en el lugar del que parten hacia el que se dirigen para asentarse. Con anterioridad elaboramos una introducción que se bifurca en dos visiones de interés: una conceptual sobre el origen de la migración y su connotación antropológica y otra que refiere y considera a la novela gráfica un recurso considerable, -aunque todavía inédito para la historiografía-, para crear conciencia sobre temas históricos-sociológicos tan controvertidos cómo los expuestos.
Discurso que seguiremos desarrollando en un futuro a partir de los siguientes títulos: Sansamba de Susanna Marín, Sofía y el Negro de Judith Vanistendeal, Rolling Blackouts. Dispatches from Turkey, Siria and Iraq de Sarah Gliden y Bienvenue à Calais, Les raisons de la colère de Marie-Françoise Colombani
23
Kovačev, Dušan. "Meta-legal basis of the autonomy of Vojvodina before 1929". Nacionalni interes 45, n. 2 (2023): 87–111. http://dx.doi.org/10.5937/nint45-45143.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
The meta-legal basis of the provincial autonomy of Vojvodina appeared in political form only after the state fusion in 1918. A crossanalysis of the material on Vojvodina political autonomism points to its origin in the historical law of the Habsburg Empire, which was accepted by a group of few political outsiders and landowners of Vojvodina. The new modern state effectively and quickly solved problems: currency, tax and agrarian issues, improvement of trade, association and achieving sustainability of independent farms in Vojvodina. Then the Vojvodina autonomists looked for arguments in the backward standpoints of the past. The narcissism of cultural "superiority", negative prejudice against "Serbianians", the confusion of the concepts of regionalism, decentralization, autonomy and self-government became the political material for the future meta-legal construction of the autonomy of Vojvodina modeled on the "crown land" of the Habsburg real union. Already at the time of the fusion of Banat, Bačka and Baranja with Serbian, there were certain tendencies for the distinctiveness of the administration of these united area. At that time, happened first political attempts of a small number of politicians for the "State of Slovenes, Serbs and Croats" to receive a certain role in the fusion of those areas with Serbia, by dint in Zagreb. In the area of Vojvodina, the right to self-determination of the people meant breaking the state ties with Hungary and fusion to Serbia. For this purpose was formed the Great National Assembly of Serbs, Bunjevs and other Slavs of Banat, Bačka and Baranja was formed. At the end of 1918, the Assembly elected by direct, equal and general suffrage of the population. This was the realization of the people's right to self-determination in a modern democratic form. The Assembly elected the administrative bodies of the temporary management of the area. Those bodies were not effective due to outdated understandings, unclear legal nature, and lack of distinction between administrative work, legal authorisation and legal competence. The problems caused by the temporary regional administration make dificulties the subsequent work of the authorities of the Kingdom of Serbs, Croats and Slovenes, causing great intolerance towards "centralism." The government of the new state effectively solved administrative problems, currency, tax and agrarian issues under democratic conditions, and developed local selfgovernment. As the public became aware of the benefits of democratic modernity, general support for the new order grew. Opponents of the new order were a small number of nationalized landowners, economically stable officials and privileged individuals of the former Habsburg order. Among them, Serbian opposition politicians and Croatian nationalists sought support. Vojvodina's political autonomism is from the beginning linked to the political work of Croatian nationalists, the political fashion of "regionalism" and the historical sentiments of the Habsburg era. From the beginning formulated political ideas of Vojvodina autonomy, two phenomena stand out conspicuously: the support of Croatian nationalists and emotional intolerance towards Serbia and "Serbians." These phenomena are paradigmatically shown by two historical sources: Mihovil Tomandl's article "Serbian hegemony" (1923) and the proclamation of the Independent Democratic Party published under the title "Vojvodina wants to be its own" (1924).