Segui questo link per vedere altri tipi di pubblicazioni sul tema: Innovative paradigm.
Articoli di riviste sul tema "Innovative paradigm"
Cita una fonte nei formati APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard e in molti altri stili
Vedi i top-50 articoli di riviste per l'attività di ricerca sul tema "Innovative paradigm".
Accanto a ogni fonte nell'elenco di riferimenti c'è un pulsante "Aggiungi alla bibliografia". Premilo e genereremo automaticamente la citazione bibliografica dell'opera scelta nello stile citazionale di cui hai bisogno: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver ecc.
Puoi anche scaricare il testo completo della pubblicazione scientifica nel formato .pdf e leggere online l'abstract (il sommario) dell'opera se è presente nei metadati.
Vedi gli articoli di riviste di molte aree scientifiche e compila una bibliografia corretta.
1
Kuznyetsova, A., N. Kozmuk, O. Klipkova e A. Stetsevich. "STRUCTURAL PARADIGM OF INNOVATIVE AND INVESTMENT PARTNERSHIP". Financial and credit activity: problems of theory and practice 2, n. 37 (30 aprile 2021): 351–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.18371/fcaptp.v2i37.230303.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
Abstract. The article is focused on finding a new and modification of the existing paradigms of the innovative and investment partnership formation. The article studies the perspective key members of innovative partnership, their roles and possible cooperation effects. The attention is focused on the choice of directions of the innovative process realization depending upon the comparative assessment of approaches and the innovation commercialization expenses. The author outlines the direct and indirect form of the innovative partnership: «enterprise — university» and «enterprise — innovative mediator — university». The analysis of the profit-making channels in each chosen type of cooperation is provided. The globalization and capital concentration platforms preceding the integration partnership agreements are outlined and analyzed. To build up a separate adaptive paradigm of the innovative partnership the factors of the inner and outer environment forming the barriers for the realization of successful innovation partnership models are analyzed. It was found that one more factor to be considered when choosing the forms of innovative partnership between the parties concerned is the payback from the innovation commercialization, Its amount will be impacted by the objective factors of the currency depreciation in time, level of the sci-tech progress development, facilitation of the state policy, selected priorities of the national strategies, etc. Concerning the subjective factors, they fall within the variety of behavioral characteristics of an individual. It is stated that the formation of the innovative partnership is closely connected with the regional peculiarity of the location of enterprises, institutions and organizations. It is suggested to outline the innovative export-oriented and innovative import-dependent regions of the country. This feature will cover the possibilities of acquisition of innovations, knowledge and experience, and resources for their realization from the inner and outer markets. One of the factors of the commercial success achievement with the chosen form of the innovative partnership is the Blue Ocean Strategy which will allow studying the market more in detail and find the market niches in need of such new integrative formations. The incorporation of spin-off and spin-out companies is outlined as an efficient direction of the innovative partnership grounds realization. The article was prepared with the application of the following methods: expert appraisal, analysis and synthesis, economic experiment and scientific abstraction as well as graphic and logical methods. Keywords: innovative partnership, innovative process, innovation, business model of the innovative partnership, innovative mediator, innovation commercialization. JEL Classification L26 Formulas: 0; fig.: 3; tabl.: 2; bibl.: 12.
2
Rylach, N. "FORMATION INNOVATIVE PARADIGM: RETROSPECTIVE AND PRESENT". ACTUAL PROBLEMS OF INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS 1, n. 127 (2016): 138–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.17721/apmv.2016.127.1.138-148.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
In the current conditions of the world economy, an increasing emphasis on the in- novative direction of development, covering all sectors of the economy, a prerequisite for the development of post-industrial society. A prerequisite for this process is the modern scientific and technological revolution that provides productivity growth, accelerated development of science and education. Scientific and technical progress provides innovative process that is multi-path of development, implementation to the commercialization of science. Innovation activity means innovation and dissemination of scientific and technological progress to meet the changing needs of society. The result of this process is an innovation. Although innovative practice is thousands of years, the subject of special scientific study innovations were only in the XX century. In the evolution of forming a system of knowledge about the development of innovation theory, scientists [18] are the following important steps: the first third of the twentieth century – the formation of the fundamentals of the theory (the period of basic innovation in this area of scientific knowledge); the second third of the twentieth century – the development of basic and detail the innovative ideas of the previous period; since the mid-1970s – a new theoretical breakthrough associated with a wave of epochal and basic innovations in the period of post-industrial society of the late twentieth century – the use of systems analysis, the study of national innovation systems.
3
Chávez, José Carlos Rodríguez. "Science and Technology Policy in Latino America Countries: A Panel Data approach". Revista Nicolaita de Estudios Económicos 5, n. 2 (11 dicembre 2013): 7–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.33110/rnee.v5i2.126.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
This paper analyzes science and technology policy in Latino America. Making use of panel data methods, we test for successful science and technology policy, and supporting innovation practices in Argentina, Brazil, Chile and Mexico. There are three paradigms that explain science and technology policy: the market failure paradigm, the mission paradigm, and the cooperative technology paradigm. The market failure paradigm assumes that market mechanisms will lead to optimal rates of science production and technical change. The mission technology paradigm assumes that governments may play an important role in the programmatic mission of agencies. The cooperative technology policy paradigm assumes that markets are not always the most efficient route to innovation. The results suggest that there is room for government involvement when defining a science and technology policy that aims to support the development of innovative capabilities. We conclude that mission and/ or the cooperative technology paradigms are adequate for defining a successful science and technology policy in Latino America.
4
Безгін, К. С., М. П. Мартіянова e В. В. Ушкальов. "CHARACTERISTICS OF INNOVATION-ORIENTED ORGANIZATION: A BEHAVIORAL PARADIGM". Підприємництво та інновації, n. 11-1 (29 maggio 2020): 126–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.37320/2415-3583/11.18.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
The article summarizes the arguments and counterarguments in the scientific debate on the use of a behavioral approach to managing an innovation-oriented organization. The main purpose of the study is to identify typical characteristics of modern innovation organizations that emerge in the process of ontogeny of the organization, have a behavioral nature and contribute to improving the effectiveness of innovation. As a result, the characteristics of modern innovative organizations that determine the effectiveness of their activity are determined. The change of behavior of innovatively active subjects at the subject and polysubjective levels under the influence of administration, routine and violation of integrity of activity is shown. Mentioned set of features can be used as a benchmark in modeling and managing innovation activity and innovation processes in organizations.
5
Vlasenko, T., e L. Teshеva. "Modern paradigm of innovative ecosystem". BULLETIN OF KHARKIV NATION AGRARIAN UNIVERSITY NAMED AFTER V.V.DOKUCHAYEVA. SERIES "ECONOMIC SCIENCES", n. 3 (2020): 287–303. http://dx.doi.org/10.31359/2312-3427-2020-3-287.
Testo completo
6
Egorova, Alexandra, e Artyom Uzhegov. "Multi-paradigm model of the region’s innovative climate development". E3S Web of Conferences 258 (2021): 12005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202125812005.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
The relevance of the innovative development of regional economies is dictated by both an internal factor (balanced development of territories) and an external factor (the country’s competitiveness in the world market). The authors highlight the threats that may arise in different areas of the region’s economic activity. The rating system for assessing the innovation climate in the region has been substantiated and developed. The methodology of the author’s rating assessment of the innovation climate in the region allows a systematic approach to the qualitative and quantitative characteristics of the state of the innovation climate in the region (good, normal, pre-crisis, crisis). On the basis of the developed assessment system, a multi-paradigm model of the formation of an innovation climate in the region is proposed. The proposed author’s model, which reflects the system of factors of the innovation climate in the region, makes it possible to form ways of forming an innovation climate in the context of the selected areas. It seems that the proposed rating system of assessment and the model interconnected with it have applied significance, an integrated approach will allow assessing the level of the innovation climate in the region, and the proposed model will help to develop effective measures to form an innovative climate. The results of the work are the proposed rating system of assessment and a multi-paradigm model interconnected with it. In conclusion, the authors made a number of proposals for the formation of an innovative climate in the region.
7
Borsh, Lyudmila Mihaylovnа. "TECHNOLOGY OF INNOVATIVE ACTIVITIES: FORMATION OF A NEW PARADIGM". Scientific Bulletin: finance, banking, investment., n. 3 (52) (2021): 80–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.37279/2312-5330-2020-3-80-93.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
The article is devoted to the study of the topical scientific and practical problem of the macroeconomic theory of innovation, which has a significant impact on technological development and the formation of a new paradigm, ensuring the stability of the development of high-tech industries. The purpose of this article is to determine the technology of innovation and the formation of a new technological paradigm. To achieve this goal, the following tasks were completed: scientific approaches to the development of innovation technologies and the formation of a new technological paradigm were analyzed, the role of investments in innovative activities was determined. The scientific discussion is assessed in accordance with the state policy of innovative development, the fundamental differences in the theoretical argumentation of the supporters of neoliberalism, liberalism and classicism are revealed. The position of economists who support the monetarist theory and evaluate it from the point of view of an effective regulator is analyzed. Innovative technological development is determined by qualitative changes in the institutional framework and timely, high-quality transformation processes in the public administration system; depends on the chosen vector of economic theory based on knowledge and practical experience. The definition of the technological paradigm as the foundation of evolutionary transformations based on methodology, methodology, technologies, general strategy of socio-economic development and formed approaches is given. The state policy of innovative and technological development is a methodological basis for economic development using various theories of attracting investment in innovation. The effectiveness of innovation in technological development has been proven throughout the entire historical development of the Russian economy and directly depends on the fundamental prerequisites for the effective use of new knowledge.
8
Cao, Xia, Dan Lv e Zeyu Xing. "Innovative Resources, Promotion Focus and Responsible Innovation: The Moderating Roles of Adaptive Governance". Sustainability 12, n. 7 (3 aprile 2020): 2860. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12072860.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
This paper discusses the relationship between innovative resources, promotion focus, adaptive governance and responsible innovation. In accordance with the path of “demand—motivation—behavior”, this paper takes adaptive governance as the moderator, and constructs an influence relationship model of “innovative resources—promotion focus (adaptive governance)—responsible innovation”. Then this paper takes 361 managers from above the middle management level and the technical personnel of enterprises as the investigation objects, and conducts empirical research by using the structural equation model. The results show that: (1) innovative resources have a significant positive impact on responsible innovation; (2) promotion focus partially mediates the effect of innovative resources on responsible innovation; (3) adaptive governance has a positive moderating effect on the relationship between innovative resources and responsible innovation. The results enrich the quantitative research of responsible innovation, reveal the internal mechanism of innovative resources affecting responsible innovation, provide a new way for technological innovation governance and provide a new way of thinking for the transformation from the traditional innovation paradigm into a sustainable innovation paradigm.
9
Zelisko Inna, Zelisko Inna, Hu Songjie Hu Songjie e Saranenko Andriy Saranenko Andriy. "INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT PARADIGM OF TELECOMMUNICATIONS ENTERPRISES IN THE AGE OF ECONOMY DIGITALIZATION". Socio World-Social Research & Behavioral Sciences 04, n. 02 (15 aprile 2021): 29–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.36962/swd04022021-29.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
Formation of a competitive economy in the age of information technologies is based on the economy digitalization. Activation of Ukraine's European integration progress and the use of the world's leading technologies require economic development acceleration, which is based on the innovations application in all national economy sectors. The telecommunications industry has strategic importance for ensuring sustainable development, stable industrial and social spheres functioning in Ukraine. Progressive development of science, engineering and technologies, innovation and high knowledge intensity of modern production make special demands as for the ways of telecommunication enterprises development. With deepening of globalization and competition constant intensification, the foundation of telecommunication enterprises functioning are innovations which are enabling their innovative development. Formation of innovative development paradigm of telecommunication enterprises development involves: regulatory and legal support of innovative ideas; state support and stimulation of innovative activity (protection and support of domestic companies, financial support of industrial samples patenting, utility models, inventions abroad); giving priority to innovative factors in order to increase competitiveness and to ensure positive financial performance of enterprises; information interaction and coherence of innovation activity; creativity of approaches to ensure the conditions of the enterprise's innovative activity. Keywords: telecommunication enterprises, innovative activity, innovative development, risk, competitiveness, digital economy, scientific and technological progress, information and communication technologies, information society.
10
Meshko, N. P., e O. V. Tarabara. "Innovative dominant in modern educational paradigm". Bulletin of the Dnipropetrovsk University. Series: Management of Innovations 20, n. 1 (29 marzo 2012): 19. http://dx.doi.org/10.15421/191203.
Testo completo
11
Rhodes, Rosamond. "An Innovative Paradigm for Clinical Research". American Journal of Bioethics 3, n. 4 (novembre 2003): 59–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/152651603322614643.
Testo completo
12
Mohamed, Abeer Samy Yousef. "Smart Materials Innovative Technologies in architecture; Towards Innovative design paradigm". Energy Procedia 115 (giugno 2017): 139–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.egypro.2017.05.014.
Testo completo
13
Malykhina, Irina O., Victoria N. Riapuhina, Elena N. Chizhova e Irina V. Roydolskaya. "Neo-industrialization as the Bases of the Innovative Trajectory of the Development of Russian Industry before and during the Coronavirus Disease-19 Pandemic". Open Access Macedonian Journal of Medical Sciences 8, E (25 dicembre 2020): 685–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.3889/oamjms.2020.5676.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
BACKGROUND: This article is devoted to the study and improvement of theoretical approaches to the formation of the neo-industrialization paradigm as the basis of the innovative trajectory of the development of economic systems. The relevance of this study is due to the growing importance of neo-industrialization policies as an objective basis for the transition of the Russian economy to an innovative type.
AIM: The aim of the work is the theoretical justification and development of scientific and practical recommendations for the implementation of the innovative trajectory of the development of economic systems in the conditions of neo-industrial challenges.
METHODS: In the framework of this study, general scientific methods of cognition were used, namely, the method of analysis, synthesis, induction, structural and functional analysis. The article develops theoretical concepts and conceptual foundations of the formation of the neo-industrialization paradigm as the basis for the innovation of the Russian economy. The foreign and Russian experience of the formation and implementation of an innovative model for the development of economic systems with the elimination of specific characteristics of the implementation of innovative processes is studied.
RESULTS: The analysis is made and the most important parameters of the formation of the neo-industrialization paradigm are identified. Modern trends, critical neo-industrial challenges and threats to the innovative development of economic systems are structured, refined and typologized. The most effective instruments of state participation in enhancing innovation processes in the context of neo-industrial challenges have been consolidated.
CONCLUSION: A paradigm concept for the innovation of economic systems in the context of the implementation of neo-industrialization policies has been formed as a response to modern challenges and threats.
14
Ostapenko, Tetiana, Igor Britchenko e Peter Lošonczi. "RESEARCH OF THE INTELLIGENT RESOURCE SECURITY OF THE NANOECONOMIC DEVELOPMENT INNOVATION PARADIGM". Baltic Journal of Economic Studies 7, n. 5 (27 dicembre 2021): 159–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2021-7-5-159-168.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
The resources and resource potential of the innovative component of nanoeconomics are analyzed. The factors of production – classical types of resources such as land, labor, capital and technology – are described. Ways of influencing the security resources of nanoeconomics within the innovation paradigm are evaluated. The purpose of the study is to identify the factor of nanoeconomics in the formation of resource security potential in the innovation paradigm. To achieve this goal, the following tasks were set: to characterize the importance of the land resource as a factor in the potential of economic nanosystems; to highlight the importance of capital as a factor of nanoproduction and an indicator of the innovation paradigm; to determine the labor resource in the development of innovative nanosystems; to analyze the intellectual potential of nanoeconomic development of the innovation paradigm; to identify clusters of innovative nanopotential in the regions of countries with transition economies. Each resource is examined separately with the first analysis of a resource security assessment such as land. The other resource under consideration is labor. Demographic factors become decisive in describing the development of labor resources. The capital factor allows the formation of independent economic systems, when the state budget affects the possibility of developing science, education and health care. A number of methods were applied during the study: methods of induction and deduction (to assess the importance of the innovation paradigm for the development of nanoeconomics); system analysis and structural approach (to determine the aggregate state of production factors); method of comparing the quality of production factors in market economies and in developed countries; an observation method (for assessing the state of resources in different countries); method of cluster analysis (to determine the existence of innovation-territorial regions in countries with economies in transition). The analysis is carried out to identify the conditions of the impact of production factors on the innovative paradigm of nanoeconomics. It reveals theoretical approaches to the formation of nanoeconomics and its active development. As a result of the study of intellectual and resource potential of security, a cluster analysis was carried out to assess the conditions for the formation of innovation-territorial regions. This study allows to understand the role of production security factors in the formation of the innovation paradigm and the efficiency of the development of nanoeconomics. The way of providing the basis for the development of nanoeconomics in the form of efficient use of production factors is considered as a perspective.
15
Windrum, Paul, Giuliana Battisti, Jorge Gallego e Luis Rubalcaba. "Paradigm Shift? Open Innovation and the Innovative Performance of EU Firms". Academy of Management Proceedings 2013, n. 1 (gennaio 2013): 15296. http://dx.doi.org/10.5465/ambpp.2013.15296abstract.
Testo completo
16
Batechko, Nina, e Mykola Mykhailichenko. "EVOLUTION OF EDUCATIONAL PARADIGMS IN MODERN SCIENTIFIC DISCOURSE". Osvitolohiya, n. 9 (2020): 29–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.28925/2226-3012.2020.9.4.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
The article analyzes the phenomenon of the educational paradigm as a philosophical and pedagogical category. The article states the importance of educational paradigms for the modernization and development of the educational sphere as a catalyst for shifts and qualitative transformations in it. The aim of the article is the methodological substantiation of the educational program in the context of modern transformations in society. Attention has been focused on the definitions «paradigm», «pedagogical paradigm», «educational paradigm». The discourse of scientists about these concepts has been provided and the general and distinctive shades between them have been clarified. Various types of educational paradigms have been highlighted and grouped depending on the goals they carry in their contents. Depending on the analysis carried out, it has been indicated that an educational paradigm always, in any historical era, acts as a paradigm idea of the development of education. It has been noted that the mission of pedagogy is in the change and dynamics of the educational paradigm as the one which provides the basis for innovative approaches to the development of education, the contents and organization of training and interaction among the main subjects of education. The synergetic paradigm has been indicated as a new and innovative educational paradigm. Education can be considered as a synergetic system whose self-organization processes can be fully described by such categories as bifurcations, fluctuations, attractors, dissipative structures, etc. This circumstance leads to a revision of the established, traditional ideas about education and makes the basis for qualitative changes in its development.
17
Shults, Svitlana, e Olena Lutskiv. "Determinants of socio-economic transformations of technological systems: theoretical and methodical aspects". Regional Economy, n. 2(96) (2020): 102–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.36818/1562-0905-2020-2-9.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
Technological development of society is of unequal cyclic nature and is characterized by changing periods of economic growth, stagnation phases, and technological crises. The new wave of technological changes and new technological basis corresponding to the technological paradigm boost the role of innovations and displace the traditional factors of economic growth. Currently, intellectual and scientific-technical capacity are the main economic development resources. The use of innovation and new knowledge change the technological structure of the economy, increase the elements of the innovative economy, knowledge economy, and digital economy, i.e. the new technological paradigm is formed. The paper aims to research the basic determinants of technological paradigms’ forming and development, and determining their key features, as well as to analyze social transformations of the EU Member States and Ukraine. The paper focuses attention on the research of the features of social transformations. The structural transformations are analyzed based on the Bertelsmann Transformation Index that estimates the quality of democracy, market economy, and political governance. The transformation processes are assessed on the example of the EU Member States and Ukraine. The authors argue that social transformations and structural changes in the economy are related to the change of technological paradigms that boost the economic modernization and gradual progressive development of humanity in general. The nature and main determinants of 5 industrial and 2 post-industrial technological paradigms are outlined. Their general features and main areas of basic technologies implementation emerging in the realization of a certain technological paradigm are explained. The conclusions regarding the fact that innovative technologies and available scientific-technological resources define the main vector of economic development are made. The new emerging technological paradigm is of strategic importance for society development.
18
Martseniuk, L., e V. Zaporozhets. "PARADIGM OF INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT OF RAILWAY COMPANIES". Ekonomika ta derzhava, n. 2 (28 febbraio 2020): 32. http://dx.doi.org/10.32702/2306-6806.2020.2.32.
Testo completo
19
Alpeeva, E. A., e E. A. Okunkova. "Justification of a new paradigm of interaction between human capital and economic growth in the innovative economy". Russian Journal of Industrial Economics 13, n. 4 (20 dicembre 2020): 471–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.17073/2072-1634-2020-4-471-481.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
. Human capital theory serves as the scientific basis for development of innovative economics. It is human capital that determines the maintenance of quality parameters of economic growth providing for efficient development of economics of modern states. The purpose of the authors is to justify theoretical and methodological expositions of human capital management in the innovative economics. The latter is regarded as an economic system based on the innovative activity of the business entities and individuals, on the permanent technological enhancement. Such an economic system is developing due to on-going generation of new knowledge. The authors present the results of their copyright study of genesis of system human capital paradigm of innovative economics as a research concept which implements and concretizes a holistic approach to revealing the patterns and causal relationships within the system of human capital of innovative development. The method of the study is based on using monographic method, statistical methods, charts, tables, graphs and other means to visualize the findings. As a result, the authors ascertain the shift in the economic science from classical understanding of how economic growth is impacted by education in innovative economics to considering economic growth as the main driver for development of education. The authors adduce the results of statistical analysis of interrelation between the volumes of technological innovation expenditures, the aggregate level of organizations’ innovative activity and the index of human development on the international level. By means of nonparametric methods the authors discover that the development of human capital, educational potential and the level of innovation development in the regions of Russia are moderately interrelated. The authors come to the conclusion that Russian economics is unique in comparison with other countries due to the combination of the high level of human capital development and low pace of economic and innovative development. As a result, they have found out that, considered as part of human capital management providing for innovative development, investments in education can be more efficient only if science, education and business integrate to train their employees within the context of the new paradigm of interrelation between human capital and economic growth in innovative economics in which investment in innovation and technology is regarded as the main driver of development of education.
20
Safiullin, Marat Rashitovich, Mikhail Valer'evich Savelichev e Leonid Alekseevich El'shin. "Cryptocurrency potential in the context of transition of global economy to the sixth technological paradigm". Финансы и управление, n. 3 (marzo 2020): 74–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.25136/2409-7802.2020.3.33813.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
This article explores the potential of using cryptocurrency as universal currency in the conditions of transition of the global economic system towards sixth technological paradigm. The goal of this research consists in analysis of the patterns of co-evolution of the global financial system, technological system, and global economy. Based on the historical material, the author demonstrates how shift in technological paradigms is accompanied by financial crises, and result in the changes of the world financial system. Over the course of time, the gold served as the universal currency, but the advancement of technologies demanded the transition towards more flexible forms of world currency based on the national currencies of most industrialized countries. Currently, the transition to the technology of the sixth technological paradigm is followed by the global financial crisis. The U.S. dollar is not handling the functions imposed by the latest technologies upon monetary systems. The conclusion is made that finite currencies are being replaced by an innovative generation of monetary systems that are based on cryptocurrency. The authors systematize the innovation forms of investment, accounting, keeping and saving of funds, which are based on cryptocurrency and blockchain. It is demonstrated that innovation financial instruments, including different types of cryptocurrency, tokens, smart contracts, and cryptocurrency exchanges, open new opportunities for effective investment in the technologies of sixth technological paradigm. The results of research can be valuable for the government branches in establishment of the policy for usage of cryptocurrency and blockchain for entrepreneurs dealing with developments in the area of practical implementation of cryptocurrency as innovative currency.
21
Kazbekovna Kuizheva, Saida, Ludmila Grigorievna Matveeva, Tatiana Anatolievna Ovsyannikova, Vladimir Ivanovich Zarubin e Anastasiy Valerievna Kaplina. "Circular business paradigm in innovative solvations of industrial ecosystems of regions". Nexo Revista Científica 35, n. 01 (5 aprile 2022): 199–211. http://dx.doi.org/10.5377/nexo.v35i01.13931.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
In the conditions of the continuing crisis, determined both by external sanctions against Russia from several Western states, and the ongoing coronavirus pandemic, it is the industrial ecosystems of the country's regions that form innovative solvations with subjects of other industries and spheres of activity and are the main rational consumers of regional resources that combine the potential of innovative speed, high quality, adaptation to changing consumer demands, etc. This article examines the scientific and practical problem of the formation and functioning of innovation-oriented industrial solvates, the solution of which is in line with the new approach proposed by the authors to identify, determine the sources and rank the effects of innovative solvations in the regional industry. This approach is built on the concept of a circular economy, which is based on the assumption of the most rational organization and use of all types of resources of integrated industrial enterprises and related industries (spheres of activity), including through the use of end-to-end digital technologies. It has been proved that in various phases of the economic cycle, effective resource provision of solvation processes in the system of industrial innovations is of decisive importance, which means not only the rational distribution of limited resources between the participants of innovative solvations but also their lean and waste-free use in the production process.
22
Christos, Lemonakis, Konstantinos Vassakis, Garefalakis Alexandros e Michailidou Despoina. "Cooperation’s characteristics for potential innovative SMEs in crisis: The Greek paradigm". Corporate Ownership and Control 14, n. 1 (2016): 30–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.22495/cocv14i1p3.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
This study focuses on the role of business cooperation and firms’ exporting activity as the determinants of Greek manufacturing SMEs’ innovative extend use, contributing to the existing empirical literature. The empirical analysis based on unique both quantitative and qualitative data, derived from a survey covering more than 158 small and medium-sized Greek manufacturing firms, and examines factors affecting innovation activity, emphasizing on clustering activities. We find that inter-firm cooperation enhances innovation activity, which in turn empowers firms’ growth by improving domestic and overseas sales performance. This study opens the floor for a greater perspective in managerial and financial firms’ characteristics; Firms should take initiatives to promote collaborative networks for innovation and create trade associations that represent SMEs, in order to facilitate social interaction. Also, government should offer incentives to SMEs with high innovation potential (e.g. tax allowances) and invigorate linkages between universities, research centers and the private sector by creating effective institutional arrangements. Finally, we seek to provide policy implications to business owners, policy makers and academics, to optimize performance, in the shadow of economic turbulence that the country experiences.
23
Shimomura, Masatsugu. "Biomimetics ： “Bricolage” toward Innovative Paradigm Shift for Sustainability". Seikei-Kakou 29, n. 3 (20 febbraio 2017): 71. http://dx.doi.org/10.4325/seikeikakou.29.71.
Testo completo
24
Stepchenko, V. G., M. V. Davydova, E. Yu Aldoshin e N. Yu Novikov. "PARADIGM OF INNOVATIVE DEVELOPMENT IN THE «KNOWLEDGE ECONOMY»". Вестник Алтайской академии экономики и права 2, n. 9 2019 (2019): 149–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.17513/vaael.734.
Testo completo
25
G, Latha, Suchetha A, Darshan Mundinamane, Apoorva SM, Divya Bhatt e Vinaya MP. "Host modulation therapy- An innovative paradigm in dentistry". Journal of Research in Medical and Dental Science 4, n. 1 (2016): 10. http://dx.doi.org/10.5455/jrmds.2016412.
Testo completo
26
Alkhatib, Ghazi, e Omar Al-Humaidi. "Innovative Virtual Teams on Demand: HBDI-based paradigm". Procedia Computer Science 131 (2018): 139–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2018.04.196.
Testo completo
27
Ahmad, S. "Science, Engineering and Technology Education: Innovative Paradigm Shift". Asia Pacific Business Review 5, n. 1 (gennaio 2009): 3–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/097324700900500101.
Testo completo
28
Xu, Jiuping, e Meihui Li. "Innovative technological paradigm-based approach towards biofuel feedstock". Energy Conversion and Management 141 (giugno 2017): 48–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.enconman.2016.04.075.
Testo completo
29
Zhou, Fanqin, Wenjing Li, Yang Yang, Lei Feng, Peng Yu, Mingyu Zhao, Xueqiang Yan e Jianjun Wu. "Intelligence-Endogenous Networks: Innovative Network Paradigm for 6G". IEEE Wireless Communications 29, n. 1 (febbraio 2022): 40–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/mwc.004.00320.
Testo completo
30
Spilnyk, Iryna, Ruslan Brukhanskyi, Nataliia Struk, Olena Kolesnikova e Liudmyla Sokolenko. "Digital accounting: innovative technologies cause a new paradigm". Independent Journal of Management & Production 13, n. 3 (1 maggio 2022): s215—s224. http://dx.doi.org/10.14807/ijmp.v13i3.1991.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
The article is dealing with the concept of “digital accounting", highlights its historical origins and current discourse in the contextual relationship and interdependence of accounting and information technology. Accordingly, the issues of rethinking the role and place of accounting in the digital economy, the study of changes in its semantic, methodological and conceptual principles under the influence of the growth of information potential of the digital economic space become relevant. Since the modern period is a qualitatively new stage in the development of accounting, which in all its aspects is undergoing of significant changes, it should accordingly lead to the transition to a new digital accounting paradigm.
31
RUBEL, O. E., e A. A. ZHIKHAREVA. "OPEN INNOVATION CONCEPT AS A PART OF INTEGRATION OF UKRAINE INTO EUROPEAN RESEARCH AREA". Economic innovations 20, n. 1(66) (20 marzo 2018): 162–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.31520/ei.2018.20.1(66).162-173.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
Topicality. The integration of Ukraine into European Research Area (ERA) offers additional opportunities for the development of the national research system through the potential entry of new innovation and technology markets and facilitating the communication between Ukrainian scientists and researchers from EU countries. Priority 5 of the ERA roadmap contains tasks to improve the access to publications, open scientific data and knowledge, the introduction of state support for innovation activities and new procedures for the transfer of knowledge, protection and effective use intellectual property for the purpose of optimal exchange and transfer of scientific knowledge for the disclosure of the science potential and promoting the creation of a competitive economy. This indicates that the concept �Open Innovations" is the leading element of scientific innovation. Aim and tasks. The purpose of the article is to study the innovative "conceptual space" and to create the methodological basis for the implementation of the modern international innovative conceptual apparatus "Open innovation" in the Ukrainian economic scientific discourse. Research results. Discussion of significance each of the concepts defined in the article is important and perspective in scientific and methodological sense. The formation of innovative discourse takes place at the junction of many disciplines: technical, economic, linguistic, philosophical, and social. The practice of innovative activity will determine the most effective and demanded in the future. The paradigm Open Innovation 2.0 is based on the concept of Shared Values / Development Strategy and the Model of Innovations "Quadro Helix". The essence of this paradigm means that civil society joins with business, academia, and government sectors to drive changes far beyond the scope of what any one organization can do on their own. Conclusions. The cultivation and organization of an innovative ecosystem with common innovation platform allows to combine competition, active user participation and innovation. It is crucial for the success of innovative activities.
32
KAMCHATOVA, Ekaterina, Vyacheslav BURLAKOV, Olesya DZYURDZYA e Ara YEREMYAN. "The Paradigm of Innovative Economic Development: a New Philosophy or the Basis of Evolu-tion in the Conditions of Digitalisation". WISDOM 2, n. 1 (26 maggio 2022): 67–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.24234/wisdom.v2i1.766.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
This article discusses the processes of implementing innovative prospects for developing the Russian economy in the context of digitalisation. Currently, in countries with a high level of innovation component in all spheres of economic activity, innovation is fundamental for the development of the economies of these countries. Innovative development is an integral part of economic development philosophy in countries such as Germany, Sweden, Japan, South Korea, China, the USA, and other developed countries. Unlike the countries mentioned above, the economy of the Russian Federation, despite the existing high innovation potential, is an economy in need of significant refinement. Innovations must be the basis of modern philosophy and the development and transformation of the Russian economy. The authors consider the model of innovative development and the processes associated with the improvement of innovation as a philosophy of development and transformation, which will provide the basis for the economy’s evolution in the current situation and increase the competitiveness of enterprises of the Russian Federation. In the article, the latency of innovation is proposed as an aspect of innovative development – to transform existing developments and generate new ideas.
33
Overmans, Tom. "Innovative austerity management". Journal of Public Budgeting, Accounting & Financial Management 30, n. 4 (5 novembre 2018): 350–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jpbafm-04-2018-0035.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to uncover the right type of organizational slack for innovation. It examines how city managers conceive slack, and how they create slack to facilitate innovation while dealing with fiscal stress. Design/methodology/approach The study is built around a comparative case study approach to uncover contrasts, similarities and patterns of slack-building for innovation in austere times. It relies on the experiences of 12 experienced city managers. Data are sought from elite interviews and one focus group. Findings The main finding is that innovation in the public sector does not benefit from slack in general, but from a specific type of slack. The evidence shows that useful slack for innovation is not so much about financial slack or HR slack, but about psychological slack. Research limitations/implications This study adds to the literature that the key questions of slack research should not only focus on identifying the “right amount” of slack but also on identifying of the “right type” of slack. Practical implications Public managers who want to deal with (fiscal) crises more innovatively might reconsider their perceptions of slack and its value. Rather than operating on a pure cost effectiveness paradigm, they should balance the costs of slack and its innovative abilities. Originality/value This paper highlights the social/psychological side of austerity management. It concludes that increasing the ability of public organizations to innovatively cope with fiscal stress is not so much about increasing predictive capacity or financial buffers, but about increasing the mental leeway of coworkers.
34
Andrey, Andrunik. "3D-Model of Personnel Innovative Competencies of Self-Developing, Self-Organizing Systems". International Journal of Management Science and Business Administration 1, n. 11 (2015): 15–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.18775/ijmsba.1849-5664-5419.2014.111.1002.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
The personnel behavior modelling performs an objective function of strategic competent planning on key groups of innovative reserve of enterprise personnel. However, the analysis of a new paradigm «Management 2.0» permits to make the following conclusion – the question on the model development of innovative competencies, which are interconnected by coherent management system and able to propel HRM to a completely new level, remains open. Therefore, the main research objective of this work is to form an innovative competencies model focused on the realization of new management paradigm with dominating self-development and self-organization processes.
35
Bu, Qingxiu, e Chuanman You. "Transformative Digital Economy, Responsive Regulatory Innovation and Contingent Network Effects: The Anatomy of E-Commerce Law in China". European Business Law Review 31, Issue 4 (1 agosto 2020): 725–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/eulr2020028.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
Digital economy in the past decades has witnessed an explosive growth momentum in China. Arguably, China has now become the leader in many fronts of global innovative digital economy. This paper fills the academic gap by explicating the evolution of one of the prime constituents of digital economy, the electronic commerce (E-commerce) sector, and its accompanying regulatory paradigm. It is opined that the explosive market development has instigated a new governance model in China. This model features innovative, participatory and collaborative regulatory approaches. It represents a polycentric paradigm facilitating technological, industrial and regulatory innovation. It is argued that such industrial and regulatory innovation casts profound implications not only cross-sectionally on many other digital economy industries within China, but also trans-nationally on global governance of innovation economy as evidenced in the ongoing clash between China and the US. Digital Economy, Electronic Commerce, Network Effects, New Governance, Coregulation Framework, Industrial Standards, Consumer Protection, Data Privacy, Blockchain Technology, Internet Court
36
Farat, Olexandra, e Marta Lyvdar. "ELABORATION OF TECHNOLOGY FOR IMPLEMENTING ORGANIZATIONAL SOLUTIONS ON INNOVATIVE CLUSTERS DEVELOPMENT". Baltic Journal of Economic Studies 5, n. 3 (1 agosto 2019): 207. http://dx.doi.org/10.30525/2256-0742/2019-5-3-207-212.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
The process of cluster paradigm development in Ukraine is characterized by the absence of a clear legal and regulatory framework that would enable the clusters to be identified in the overall set of business entities. It complicates the coordination of the interaction of participants in the cluster process, as well as processes related to the creation and development of other innovation-oriented business structures. Significant impact is the availability of the weak information support, the task of which is to establish business communications between the state and business, on issues of ensuring the maximum possible realization of the existing innovative potential, in particular, by commercializing progressive innovations. Therefore, the particular topicality gets the issue of building a structured institutional environment that determines the clear mechanisms for the development of the most innovative business structures in Ukraine. The purpose of the researches was to develop specific mechanisms for organizing synergistic interaction of all participants in the process of creation and development of clusters in Ukraine in the context of multilevel sectors of their functioning. To achieve the goal, the following tasks were solved: the world tendencies of modern innovative development were investigated; the change of Ukraine’s positions during 2014–2017 in innovation rankings was considered; the state of development of innovative entrepreneurship in Ukraine was analysed; a system of scenarios for the organization of technological solutions for the development of innovative clusters was proposed; the indicator of the evaluation of the cluster paradigm development in the regions for the purpose of determining the useful effect from its implementation was presented. Considered changes in Ukraine’s positions in 2010–2017 in innovation rankings and indicators of the provision of innovation development in Ukraine in 2010–2017 state the extremely low level of state interest in creating, internal commercializing, and promoting to the external market own innovative technologies, and in the development of the very innovative business, which, in turn, reflects on the ability of enterprises to develop their innovative potential. The proposed system of scenarios for the organization of technological solutions for the development of innovative clusters includes four possible technologies for the creation of clusters, which are united in two blocks: technologies in the sector of state entrepreneurship – the source of stimulation are state institutions and technologies in the sector of private entrepreneurship – the source of initial incentives are business entities themselves. Using the proposed indicator of the expediency of cluster paradigm development in the regions to determine the useful effect from its implementation (IRCD), it is possible to estimate the influence of clusters on the development of the economy in the region.
37
Ostrovska, Halyna. "Intellectual entrepreneurship under a new paradigm of economic activity". Herald of Ternopil National Economic University, n. 2(84) (31 maggio 2017): 83–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.35774/visnyk2017.02.083.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
The article theoretically grounds approaches to defining intellectual entrepreneurship as a new social phenomenon and explains its role in the formation of a knowledge-based economy. It also develops a holistic understanding of essential characteristics that intellectual entrepreneurship has acquired under a new paradigm of economic activity. The essence of intellectualization and its manifestations as well as structural and qualitative transformations of an entrepreneurial environment are highlighted. Specific features of an innovative enterprise, viewed as a key business model in a knowledge-based economy, are identified. It is emphasized that the concepts of free enterprise and intellectual entrepreneur have a new understanding. The importance of qualitative changes is underlined, and the peculiarities of intellectual entrepreneurship are determined, particularly those related to acquisition and use of advanced knowledge. The latter is considered as the most important resource. A systematic review of factors influencing the formation and development of intellectual corporate entrepreneurship is com- pleted. It is proved that under current conditions, intellectual entrepreneurship requires a new holistic approach which is based on organizational synapses created by experience or training opportunities. In addition to giving a critical analysis of development outcomes of innovative entrepreneurship, the article reveals key negative factors and trends that hinder spreading of innovative activities in domestic enterprises. The key role of intellectual capital as an inter-specific resource for the development of intellectual enterprise is emphasized, because the described business model develops on the basis of intellectual abilities of knowledge entrepreneurs, or creative class, able to serve as an engine for innovative modernization. The interdependent components of intellectual capital are divided into: human capital (people, their knowledge, education, professional competence) and innovations (intellectual product as a result of creative work). A particular attention is paid to the development of corporate culture in the context of actualization of human capital. Based on the research findings, some areas of applying the study results are suggested. In this way, the necessary preconditions for the formation of intellectual entrepreneurship will be fulfilled. The observance of them will contribute to consolidating the foundations of innovation breakthrough at the stage of development of intellectual entrepreneurship in Ukraine.
38
Shontz, William D. "An Innovative Nonparametric Measure of Response Bias". Proceedings of the Human Factors Society Annual Meeting 32, n. 17 (ottobre 1988): 1191–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/154193128803201715.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
A nonparametric technique for assessing the effects of response bias within the Signal Detection Theory paradigm was developed. The technique involves modification of the 2 × n table produced when rating scale data are collected under the SDT paradigm. A χ2 value computed from the modified table is used as the unit of analysis in statistical analyses. This new measure of response bias has been shown to be independent of several nonparamentric measures of sensitivity when tested under three different experimental designs.
39
Лукина, Е., e E. Lukina. "Methodical Approach to Developing a Marketing Strategy". Scientific Research and Development. Economics of the Firm 7, n. 1 (14 maggio 2018): 26–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.12737/article_5ad9de218ee196.90014341.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
The dominant paradigm of strategic marketing is increasingly becoming the object of criticism and stimulates alternative approaches to selection or creation of the reference strategy. First of all, it is connected with the development of the resource concept of competitive advantages of enterprises and the new dominant logic of marketing, in which offers an innovative paradigm for managing development of business entities and promoting their products to target markets. The methodical approach for marketing strategy of a company formation, a concept of innovation potential of the company that distinguishes from the known fact that reflects not just the availability of the necessary resources for the implementation of innovation, and indicates the ability either to generate different types of innovation within the enterprise, or to borrow them from the outside is set out in this article. The reference to types of innovation is the author’s proposal; an advanced algorithm of marketing strategy formation, the author’s matrix of choice for marketing strategies and methods of evaluation of innovative potential of the enterprise as the basis of strategy selection is the part of it.
40
AZIS, YUDI, e HIROSHI OSADA. "MANAGING INNOVATION USING DESIGN FOR SIX SIGMA (DFSS) APPROACH IN HEALTHCARE SERVICE ORGANIZATIONS". International Journal of Innovation and Technology Management 10, n. 03 (giugno 2013): 1340010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s0219877013400105.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
Nowadays, healthcare service organizations have been using Design for Six Sigma (DFSS) for managing innovation to create new products, services and business processes. This paper is intended to demonstrate the effectiveness of DFSS on managing innovation in healthcare service organizations. The research is conducted on five leading US healthcare service organizations. Furthermore, roadmap for managing innovation is proposed. The result confirms that the DFSS strengthens two factors in managing innovation: (1) finding an innovative idea, (2) guiding and realizing an innovative idea. In addition, DFSS plays a critical role in shifting paradigm from subjective to objective judgment. Moreover, DFSS provides a platform for strategic critical measurement.
41
Pokrovskaia, N. N., D. V. Golohvastov e M. Yu Ababkova. "Innovative Growth of the Virtual Economy: A Regulatory Paradigm Shift". Economics and Management 27, n. 8 (21 settembre 2021): 576–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.35854/1998-1627-2021-8-576-592.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
Aim. The presented study aims to harmonize the understanding of the innovative growth of the virtual economy within the framework of a regulatory approach from the perspective of the evolution of regulatory mechanisms.Tasks. The authors identify the major conditions and elements of the virtual economy; clarify the definition of the virtual economy; determine the essential characteristics of the innovative growth of the virtual economy; develop a multidimensional matrix of tools for measuring the innovative growth of the virtual economy within the framework of a regulatory approach.Methods. This study uses the methods of scientific analysis and synthesis as well as comparative and systems approach to examine the reflection of innovative growth in the evolution of regulatory mechanisms that determine economic behavior.Results. The acceleration of economic virtualization during the 2020–2021 pandemic has exacerbated the need for a scientific analysis of the ways and directions of innovative economic growth with allowance for intangible, primarily virtual factors, which include traditional symbolic components implemented on the basis of digital tools. The conducted analysis makes it possible to identify four main dimensions that determine directions for the innovative growth of the virtual economy: adaptation to new categories of entities to the extent of personification based on big data; development of new behavioral models; development of institutions and ecosystems; prioritization of a meaningful requirement for harmony and aesthetics on the part of users.Conclusions. A study of the multidimensional model of innovative growth of the virtual economy will make it possible to improve both the decision-making of individual and group entities, and the regulatory mechanisms used by the government.
42
De Rosa, Eugenia. "Innovazione sociale e minority groups. Cooperative sociali e welfare locale nella cittŕ di Roma". SOCIOLOGIA E RICERCA SOCIALE, n. 99 (aprile 2013): 93–125. http://dx.doi.org/10.3280/sr2012-099006.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
The social innovation paradigm recognizes enterprise' innovative and progressive potential to create new and sustainable solutions to the needs and challenges of modern age (ageing population and the changing nature of gender roles, poverty, migration processes, unemployment of the younger generations, the diffusion of flexible and precarious work, and guarantee equal rights). This article proposes a framework for analyzing the processes and changes generated through the interaction of organizations of social economy (service providers), local public institutions and civil society. This is achieved by integrating a critical analysis of literature with the results of a case study conducted on social cooperation in the city of Rome. The aim is placing "social welfare innovations" and social development into the social innovation paradigm providing a model of the paradigm of social innovation according to a social economy and human rights perspective
43
Shebanina, O., e Yu Kormyshkin. "The modern paradigm of innovative development of agricultural entrepreneurship". UKRAINIAN BLACK SEA REGION AGRARIAN SCIENCE 103, n. 3 (2019): 4–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.31521/2313-092x/2019-3(103)-1.
Testo completo
44
Samoylova, I. N. "TEACHER’S READINESS FOR CREATIVE ACTIVITY IN AN INNOVATIVE PARADIGM". Historical and social-educational ideas 10, n. 1 (19 marzo 2018): 152–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.17748/2075-9908-2018-10-1-152-156.
Testo completo
45
Nataliya Apatova et al.,, Nataliya Apatova et al ,. "Formation of a New Paradigm of Innovative Technological Development". International Journal of Mechanical and Production Engineering Research and Development 10, n. 3 (2020): 4631–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.24247/ijmperdjun2020438.
Testo completo
46
Li, Meihui, Ziqiang Zeng e Yinhai Wang. "An innovative car sharing technological paradigm towards sustainable mobility". Journal of Cleaner Production 288 (marzo 2021): 125626. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.125626.
Testo completo
47
Passarelli, Mariacarmela, Giuseppina Ambrogio, Luigino Filice, Alfio Cariola e Vincenzo Straffalaci. "LiSC Model: an innovative paradigm for Liquid Supply Chain". Procedia Computer Science 180 (2021): 893–902. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2021.01.340.
Testo completo
48
Vidickienė, Dalia, Rita Vilkė e Živilė Gedminaitė-Raudonė. "Transformative Tourism as an Innovative Tool for Rural Development". European Countryside 12, n. 3 (1 settembre 2020): 277–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/euco-2020-0016.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
AbstractThis conceptual article identifies major changes in the 21st century society that gave birth to a new generation of cultural tourists and to an innovative type of cultural tourism business that meets their needs – transformative tourism. The transformative tourism business is analysed as an integral part of a transition from the paradigm of industrial to post-industrial servitized economic system by implementation of three major paradigm innovations. The research related to the development of paradigm innovations in cultural tourism provides an opportunity to supplement the existing knowledge not only about innovative ways of cultural tourism development in rural regions, but also about general challenges facing the rural development in the post-industrial society.
49
Stepanov, Alexander A., Margarita V. Savina e Ilya A. Stepanov. "REGULARITIES AND PRINCIPLES OF DEVELOPMENT OF INNOVATIVE PROCESSES IN THE CONCEPT OF GLOBALIZATION AND DIGITAL TRANSFORMATION". EKONOMIKA I UPRAVLENIE: PROBLEMY, RESHENIYA 2, n. 11 (2021): 174–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.36871/ek.up.p.r.2021.11.02.022.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
The article deals with theoretical and methodological issues of improving management sys-tems for innovative development. At the same time, special attention is paid to the issues of the impact of the achievements of scientific and technological progress on the transformation of patterns and principles of sub-stantiating effective innovative solutions in the paradigm of digitalization, digital transformation and globaliza-tion. It has been substantiated and proved that digitalization and digital transformation predetermined the need in the process of innovation to take into account such new patterns of development of innovation processes as turbulence, delocality, desynchronization, temporality, humanization, and a high level of corporate culture all participants in the innovation process.
50
An, Eugene, e Valentine Kundius. "FORMATION OF THE EURASIAN TECHNOLOGY PLATFORM AS A BASIS OF INNOVATIONAL DEVELOPMENT OF THE ECONOMY OF THE TRANSBOUNDARY REGIONS". Economics Profession Business 3, n. 3 (9 settembre 2019): 5–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.14258/epb201928.
Testo completoAbstract (sommario):
In article the main components of the innovation economy are defined, each of which reaches competitive level by world criteria: first of all it is the innovation potential; institutional innovation system; the innovation infrastructure and highly organizational forms of interaction of economic subjects, including the innovation centers, clusters, venture business and others. Results of a research of the innovation processes in cross-border territories of Russia and Kazakhstan, the problems constraining development of the innovation economy, a form and mechanisms of development of the innovation economies of the countries are presented. Scientific justification is given to creation International it is innovative — production consortium “R&IID” of the countries of participants of the Eurasian Economic Union (EEU), the first results of its activity, an action for further development of cooperation are shown and the expected results of introduction of a new paradigm of management of innovative processes — “business models of open innovations’ and technologies of “innovative engineering” are proved.