Um die anderen Arten von Veröffentlichungen zu diesem Thema anzuzeigen, folgen Sie diesem Link: Collective and historical memory.
Zeitschriftenartikel zum Thema „Collective and historical memory“
Geben Sie eine Quelle nach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard und anderen Zitierweisen an
Machen Sie sich mit Top-50 Zeitschriftenartikel für die Forschung zum Thema "Collective and historical memory" bekannt.
Neben jedem Werk im Literaturverzeichnis ist die Option "Zur Bibliographie hinzufügen" verfügbar. Nutzen Sie sie, wird Ihre bibliographische Angabe des gewählten Werkes nach der nötigen Zitierweise (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver usw.) automatisch gestaltet.
Sie können auch den vollen Text der wissenschaftlichen Publikation im PDF-Format herunterladen und eine Online-Annotation der Arbeit lesen, wenn die relevanten Parameter in den Metadaten verfügbar sind.
Sehen Sie die Zeitschriftenartikel für verschiedene Spezialgebieten durch und erstellen Sie Ihre Bibliographie auf korrekte Weise.
1
Hamilton, Diane. „Historical consciousness as collective memory“. Journal of Professional Nursing 12, Nr. 1 (Januar 1996): 5. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s8755-7223(96)80067-6.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
2
Behrent, Michael C. „Collective Memory and the Historical Past“. Politics, Religion & Ideology 18, Nr. 3 (03.07.2017): 355–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/21567689.2017.1355885.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
3
Kornyushchenko-Ermolaeva, N. S. „Features of Semantic Translation of Collective Historical Memory“. Tempus et Memoria 3, Nr. 2 (2022): 30–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.15826/tetm.2022.3.035.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
The article is devoted to the methodological problem of the interaction of individual and collective in the phenomenon of historical memory. The identification of specific features of collective memory, the nature and dynamics of collective memories allows, on the one hand, to conceptualize collective memory, to substantiate its ontological status, on the other, to reveal the features of the mechanisms of collective memories. The article analyzes such features of collective memory as conventionality, tradition, repeatability, selectivity, etc. The thesis about the ambivalent nature of collective historical memory as a process is defended.
4
BURLACHUK, VICTOR. „Collective Memory: Between Values and Historical Knowledge“. Sociology: Theory, Methods, Marketing, stmm 2019 (3) (Oktober 2020): 124–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.15407/sociology2020.03.124.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
At the end of the twentieth century, questions of a secondary nature suddenly became topical: what do we remember and who owns the memory? Memory as one of the mental characteristics of an individual’s activity is complemented by the concept of collective memory, which requires a different method of analysis than the activity of a separate individual. In the 1970s, a situation arose that gave rise to the so-called "historical politics" or "memory politics." If philosophical studies of memory problems of the 30’s and 40’s of the twentieth century were focused mainly on the peculiarities of perception of the past in the individual and collective consciousness and did not go beyond scientific discussions, then half a century later the situation has changed dramatically. The problem of memory has found its political sound: historians and sociologists, politicians and representatives of the media have entered the discourse on memory. Modern society, including all social, ethnic and family groups, has undergone a profound change in the traditional attitude towards the past, which has been associated with changes in the structure of government. In connection with the discrediting of the Soviet Union, the rapid decline of the Communist Party and its ideology, there was a collapse of Marxism, which provided for a certain model of time and history. The end of the revolutionary idea, a powerful vector that indicated the direction of historical time into the future, inevitably led to a rapid change in perception of the past. Three models of the future, which, according to Pierre Nora, defined the face of the past (the future as a restoration of the past, the future as progress and the future as a revolution) that existed until recently, have now lost their relevance. Today, absolute uncertainty hangs over the future. The inability to predict the future poses certain challenges to the present. The end of any teleology of history imposes on the present a debt of memory. Features of the life of memory, the specifics of its state and functioning directly affect the state of identity, both personal and collective. Distortion of memory, its incorrect work, and its ideological manipulation can give rise to an identity crisis. The memorial phenomenon is a certain political resource in a situation of severe socio-political breaks and changes. In the conditions of the economic crisis and in the absence of a real and clear program for future development, the state often seeks to turn memory into the main element of national consolidation.
5
Lee, Yu-Jung. „Historical Controversies and Collective Memory: Reassessing the Atomic Bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki“. Korea Association of World History and Culture 71 (30.06.2024): 269–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.32961/jwhc.2024.06.71.269.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
This article explores the complex historical and public memory controversies surrounding the atomic bombings of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, focusing on the National Air and Space Museum’s Enola Gay exhibition. It examines how different historians interpret the use of atomic bombs and the varying narratives presented to the public. Through the lens of Michel Foucault’s theory on popular memory, the study highlights the tensions between official narratives and revisionist perspectives. The analysis reveals how national patriotism and historical revisionism shape collective memory, questioning the ownership of historical truth. The Enola Gay controversy exemplifies the ongoing debate over historical representation, public history, and the ethical implications of wartime actions. By revisiting this controversy, the paper aims to provide a nuanced understanding of how history is constructed and contested, emphasizing the importance of inclusive and critical engagement with historical events.
6
Korzh, N. N. „Representation of Historical Knowledge in Collective Memory“. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology 39, Nr. 3 (Mai 2001): 69–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.2753/rpo1061-0405390369.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
7
Seixas, Peter. „Collective Memory, History Education, and Historical Consciousness“. Historically Speaking 7, Nr. 2 (2005): 17–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/hsp.2005.0046.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
8
Molotch, Harvey, und Diane Barthel. „Historic Preservation: Collective Memory and Historical Identity“. Contemporary Sociology 26, Nr. 3 (Mai 1997): 375. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2654060.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
9
Yarmak, Olga, Mariya Bolshakova, Zoya Savina und Anastasia Maranchak. „Actor-Network Structure of Collective Historical Memory“. Logos et Praxis, Nr. 2 (Oktober 2022): 73–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.15688/lp.jvolsu.2022.2.8.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
The authors carried out an analysis of semantic constructions about the role of Sevastopol in the Great Patriotic War. The basic question of the study is to assess the risks and opportunities of countering the technologies of information and cognitive wars, the scenarios of which involve the formation of lines of "civilizational faults" that destabilize social processes with the reformatting of history. The relevance of this research is connected with the definition of mechanisms for creating new historical and media meanings in the conditions of hybrid confrontation and modeling different variants of the development of historical events with changes in the historical and political maps of the world. First of all, this process concerns assessments of the Great Patriotic War and Victory as a historical and geopolitical achievement of Russia. The scientific novelty of the study consists in considering the collective memory of the Great Patriotic War as a network in the understanding of actor-network theory. It was revealed that the historical collective memory is filled with new symbols and signs, turning into an unstructured stream. Social actions that determine historical attitudes are being reinterpreted, a new symbolism becoming a new sociality with the broadcast of "victory" and the rejection of social and geopolitical achievements in the Great Patriotic War of the Russian people and the Soviet state. The current state of historical collective memory is filled with traces formed by both a fundamental event – the Victory in the Great Patriotic War, and events of a political and social nature. Consideration of the collective memory of the Great Patriotic War as a network in the understanding of the actor-network theory allowed us to identify signs of information campaigns aimed at discrediting the role of the Soviet Union and transforming the Victory Day through the formation of an "import" information agenda.
10
Margarita Нariga-Нrykhno, Margarita Нariga-Нrykhno, und Nazar Kotelnytskyi Nazar Kotelnytskyi. „THE PHENOMENON OF COLLECTIVE MEMORY IN MANAGEMENT AND HISTORICAL PRACTICE“. Socio World-Social Research & Behavioral Sciences 09, Nr. 03 (28.11.2022): 25–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.36962/swd09032022-25.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
This article highlights a view of collective memory that explains its connection, on the one hand, to individual memory, and on the other, to history. It is noted that the role of both individual and collective memory is not only cognitive, but also normative. That is, memory, in addition to transferring information from the past to the present, also transfers responsibility. Collective memory makes claims about the past because it has a cognitive aspect. These claims can be either confirmed or refuted by relevant historical research (studies). However, this does not mean that collective memory is only a bad story. This is probably the story written by the first person, and its role is to inform the current generation about its responsibility to the past. Keywords: memory, management, historical practice, individual memory, person, collective memory
11
Zhou, Zhichen. „The Second Construction of Family History: From Collective Memory to Historical Memory“. EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SINOLOGY 13 (2022) 13 (2022): 63–85. https://doi.org/10.12906/9783865155320_004.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
China has a tradition of erecting stone steles, as people believethat inscriptions on stone are enduring, and the wordsengraveduponthemwillperpetuallyendure. In medieval China, prominent clans often chose to inscribe their family histories on stone to ensure the preservation of their lineage’s legacy. This article, through a comparative analysis of the different copies of inscriptions found in Dunhuang documents from three prominent Tang Dynasty clans, reveals the external forces that shape the alteration of family histories after the construction of these lineages. Therefore, the completion of self-created family histories does not mark the end of lineage history construction; rather, it represents the process by which individual memories of family members transform into collective familial memory. Subsequently, external influences engage in a secondary reconstruction of family histories, a process that transforms familial memory into historical memory. There exists significant tension between the original 64 EUROPEAN JOURNAL OF SINOLOGY 13 (2022)construction and the secondary reconstruction, with the former driven by contemporary interests and the latter motivated by historical aesthetics. The interplay between these two constructions centers around the timeless themes of „history, oblivion, and memory†in human society.
12
Ilin, V. „Memory studies: from memory to oblivion“. Problems of World History, Nr. 12 (29.09.2020): 30–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.46869/2707-6776-2020-12-2.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
The article examines the concept of memory studies, which is a separate discipline that studies and analyzes memory issues. The phenomenon of memory is an important part of life, although not presented as a necessary condition of mental activity. Memory, the author notes, is a way for people to construct their past through books, movies, documents, ceremonies, and so on. In memory studies, memory arises in various aspects – collective, social, cultural, genetic, and historical. The reason for claiming a worldwide "memory age" is criticism of official versions of history, the return of memory to communities and peoples whose history has been ignored, the activation of various memorial events, and more. It is shown that a social and cultural construct collective memory retains the authentic past as its version and serves as a means to achieve certain goals. Collective memory is in constant change, which is nonlinear, irrational, and not always subject to logical analysis. New events and ideas affect the perception of the past, and patterns of interpretation of the past determine the understanding of the present. The relation between collective and individual memory appears as the relation between memory and history. The primary function of historical memory is to form an identity. The development of memory studies distinguishes the political, functional, cumulative memory that use the past to shape national identity. The context of historical memory includes the concepts of "oblivion", "custom" and "tradition" that help to identify the turning points of history as they are indicators of the emergence of a new society. Historical memory is a tool for using the past to achieve goals dictated by the current situation. Mobilizing memory and collective perceptions of the past has been an integral part of the political process in recent centuries.
13
Hanifati, Khusnul, und Yulia Nurliani Lukito. „Redefining conservation through collective memory“. International Journal of Built Environment and Scientific Research 4, Nr. 1 (30.06.2020): 23. http://dx.doi.org/10.24853/ijbesr.4.1.23-32.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Conservation theory is determined by the concept of memory. Collective memory is an accumulation of events remembered by a group who shared and involved in shaping the memory. It plays an important role to articulate meaning that relevant to the current context, needs, and agenda. In old quarter of Jakarta, the concept of memory was produced as a collective effort to reconstruct Kampung Kunir which had been evicted in 2015. With its strategic location, it is impossible to exclude the revitalization of Kota Tua to its enclave surrounding. The community surrounding Kota Tua experiencing a conflict of inclusion when the revitalization process begun. Kota Tua has become tourism object while, in reality, it is surrounded by kampungs, creating a distance between the local residents and Kota Tua. After the eviction of Kampung Kunir, the government create a program to reconstruct the settlement for several families who resist to live there. A group of architect, ASF-Indonesia, was involve in facilitating physical and historical mapping, and projecting the new Kampung Kunir. Thus the reconstruction of Kampung Kunir can be seen as an effort from the community to redefine conservation and question for whom the conservation is. This paper seeks to elucidate how collective memory plays as an important aspect to conserve historical sites.
14
Boyko, Andrey L., Anton E. Ivanesko, Andrey V. Venkov, Viktor Ya Maul’, Anton V. Posadsky, Richard Arnold und Sergey V. Chernitsyn. „Mass Movements in Historical Research and Collective Memory“. New Past, Nr. 2 (30.06.2021): 154–212. http://dx.doi.org/10.18522/2500-3224-2021-2-154-212.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
15
Jutel, Anne-Marie. „Forgetting Millie Sampson: Collective Frameworks for Historical Memory“. MEDIANZ: Media Studies Journal of Aotearoa New Zealand 10, Nr. 1 (2007): 31–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.11157/medianz-vol10iss1id74.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
16
Missiou, Marianna. „Intergenerational Transmission of Historical Events“. Libri et liberi 13, Nr. 2 (31.12.2024): 157–80. https://doi.org/10.21066/carcl.libri.13.2.2.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Major 20th-century conflicts feature extensively in children’s literature and are often discussed from diverse perspectives. Since memories of past conflicts gradually fade as witnesses pass away, the child’s role as a thirdgeneration memory receiver becomes essential in memory transmission.This article explores French picturebooks that portray the experiences of ethnic groups fleeing 20th-century conflicts. These fictional narratives draw on historical events as a collective legacy, highlighting childhood memory fragments, nostalgia, and the duty to transmit memory from generation to generation. This article’s principal aim is to investigate how the transmission of historical memory intertwines with nostalgia and intergenerational relationships in both visual and verbal forms. It also explores how family history can serve as a pretext for collective history.
17
Crook, Zeba A. „Collective Memory Distortion and the Quest for the Historical Jesus“. Journal for the Study of the Historical Jesus 11, Nr. 1 (2013): 53–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/17455197-01101004.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Memory theory is being used, if not explicitly to buttress the reliability of the Gospel portraits of Jesus, to do so implicitly by shifting the search away from the ipsissima verba Jesu towards the memory of Jesus. Rather than argue about what Jesus did or did not say—the reliability wars—some scholars now sidestep the issue by arguing that memory is inherently reliable in a broad or general way. Thus, the Gospels are reliable not at the level of detail, but at the level of broad memory, impact, or gist. In this article I argue that such optimism can only come by selectively quoting the troubling work of memory theorists, and by ignoring the full implications of memory theory.
18
Dworak, Janusz. „Historical, collective, institutional and market memory (Development of emergent phenomena)“. WSB Journal of Business and Finance 53, Nr. 1 (01.02.2019): 84–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/wsbjbf-2019-0009.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Abstract The article is of interdisciplinary nature with its emphasis laid on sociology. Its aim is to present some considerations on the way in which emergent phenomena1 are created. The question whether the reasoning based on analogy fosters phenomena related to the emergence of new notions comes as the research problem that the author tries to solve. The research hypothesis is formulated as the following statement: applying analogy,2 considerations which refer to historical memory allow additional notions, such as collective, institutional and market memory, to emerge. In the article, the research method applied in order to achieve the assumed aim is the grounded theory3 because it allows us to generate knowledge in numerous fields. During the articulation of theoretical annotations,4 new emerging notions come as a good starting point for further studies on various types of memory, and consequently, they determine their usability in practice. In the article, the annotations are placed in the footnotes and they present the author’s thoughts and reflections presented by people who have been consulted with regard to the discussed problems. Presented in the theoretical part of the article, the reference to scientific achievements in the field of marketing memory is actually very difficult because they are extremely scarce. Historical memory may be seen as knowledge resources recorded in some past stories, diaries and specialist publications; it also refers to artefacts collected in museums and to historical monuments that represent the culture of a particular society. Collective memory refers to historical awareness that is manifested by the cultivation of traditions and customs, reconstruction of buildings in which previous generations used to live. The concept of institutional memory is related to a specific vector that provides collective memory with magnitude and direction in the form of interpretation of events; it can be considered as a resultant of exogenous and endogenous processes taking place in a society. On the basis of those considerations, another type of memory appears: market memory as a new category of knowledge. The essence of market memory comes down reminding various communities about products the consumption of which is supposed to satisfy their needs at a specific level, but it will also lead to the replacement of currently operating devices with new and more advanced ones.
19
Tenezu, Felicia, und Sidhi Wiguna Teh. „PEMAKNAAN KEMBALI MEMORI KOLEKTIF DI SUNDA KELAPA MELALUI OBJEK WISATA SEJARAH DAN EDUKASI DENGAN METODE KONTRAS HARMONIS“. Jurnal Sains, Teknologi, Urban, Perancangan, Arsitektur (Stupa) 6, Nr. 2 (28.10.2024): 1563–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.24912/stupa.v6i2.30912.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Sunda Kelapa area is the forerunner of the economic driver in Jakarta that has been operating since the 5th century AD and has gone through several eras. More than just being the oldest port in Jakarta, the Sunda Kelapa area is designated as a historical tourist destination to open the knowledge of future generations about the nation's journey. Along with the times, the Sunda Kelapa area has experienced degradation of historical value and collective memory so that it is categorized as a placeless place. This is because the Sunda Kelapa area does not have a 'place' that attracts tourists to explore tourist objects around the area as an issue. The problem caused is the fading of local identity and collective memory, both historically and culturally so that the sense of place attachment to the area is decreasing. The goal is to recall the historical value and collective memory of Sunda Kelapa in an adaptive way without dismissing these values. With the method of harmonious contrast approach, the focus of architectural design emphasizes on creating tension and visual interest as a blend of past and present. The steps used include: 1) data collection, 2) survey, 3) analysis and conclusion. The result of the design is to create a historical and educational tourism environment that is adaptive, interactive, and digitized in an effort to revive historical values and collective memory in the midst of globalization so that the Sunda Kelapa area has a sense of place and identity. Keywords: degradation; identity; memory; tourism Abstrak Kawasan Sunda Kelapa merupakan cikal bakal penggerak perekonomian di Jakarta yang telah beroperasi sejak abad ke-5 Masehi dan telah melalui beberapa zaman. Lebih dari sekadar sebagai pelabuhan tertua di Jakarta, kawasan Sunda Kelapa ditetapkan sebagai destinasi wisata sejarah untuk membuka pengetahuan generasi mendatang mengenai perjalanan bangsa. Seiring dengan perkembangan zaman, kawasan Sunda Kelapa mengalami degradasi nilai historis dan memori kolektif sehingga dikategorikan sebagai placeless place. Hal ini disebabkan kawasan Sunda Kelapa tidak memiliki ‘place’ yang menarik perhatian wisatawan untuk menjelajahi objek-objek wisata di sekitar kawasan sebagai sebuah isu. Masalah yang ditimbulkan adalah pudarnya identitas lokal dan memori kolektif, baik secara sejarah dan budaya sehingga rasa place attachment pada kawasan semakin menurun. Tujuannya untuk mengingatkan kembali nilai historis dan memori kolektif Sunda Kelapa dengan cara adaptif tanpa menepikan nilai-nilai tersebut. Dengan metode pendekatan kontras harmonis, fokus desain arsitektur menekankan pada terciptanya ketegangan dan visual interest sebagai perpaduan masa lalu dan masa kini. Langkah-langkah yang digunakan antara lain: 1) pengumpulan data, 2) survey, 3) analisis dan kesimpulan. Hasil perancangan untuk menciptakan lingkungan wisata sejarah dan edukasi yang adaptif, interaktif, dan terdigitalisasi dalam upaya meningatkan kembali nilai historis dan memori kolektif di tengah lajunya globalisasi sehingga kawasan Sunda Kelapa memiliki sense of place dan identitas.
20
Temin, David Myer, und Adam Dahl. „Narrating Historical Injustice: Political Responsibility and the Politics of Memory“. Political Research Quarterly 70, Nr. 4 (05.07.2017): 905–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1065912917718636.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Memory and justice are intricately linked. To adequately address historical wrongs, liberal democracies must engage the past. Historical memory provides a connective tissue between past wrongs and present injustices. Yet the question that arises with the politics of memory and its usefulness for addressing historical injustice resides precisely in the process by which we create historical memory. More than just an acknowledgment of past events, collective memory is constructed through narrative and memorial practices that impart meaning to past events. This paper amends the politics of memory by attending to the complex relationship between the narrative figuration of historical wrongs and present attributions of collective responsibility. By viewing memory of historical wrongs as narrative constructions of the past, we argue that the narrative form of historical injustice shapes contemporary notions of political responsibility. In elaborating this claim, we examine how different narrative representations of historical injustice engender different understandings of collective responsibility. Through a reading of the Native American political theorist Vine Deloria Jr.’s famous work, Custer Died for Your Sins, we then explore how irony and satire help expose the limitations of tragic, romantic, and comedic narratives in conceptualizing political responsibility for historical injustice.
21
Foscarini, Giorgia. „Collective memory and cultural identity“. Ethnologies 39, Nr. 2 (27.09.2018): 81–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/1051665ar.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
The main aim of this article is to provide a preliminary account of the results of my fieldwork research on the identities and memories of the third and fourth generation of Israelis of Ashkenazi and Mizrahi descent, in particular of Polish and Tunisian origin. The issues I will focus on are: “how have third- and fourth-generation Israeli identities been built over time and space?”, and: “how does the current generation of young Israelis relate to their Polish and Tunisian cultural heritage, if at all, in the attempt at understanding and building their present identity?”. The influence of Israel’s historical past and of its migrant memories will be analyzed in relation to the identity-building process of both groups, and to how these memories were integrated, or not, in the Israeli national narrative.
22
Artamonov, Denis S. „Socio-epistemic arenas of historical cognition“. Izvestiya of Saratov University. Philosophy. Psychology. Pedagogy 22, Nr. 3 (22.09.2022): 238–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.18500/1819-7671-2022-22-3-238-242.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Introduction. The article is devoted to the study of the problem of the production of historical knowledge in the digital age. The author believes that historical science, existing in the paradigm of «Digital Humanities», has acquired a new object of cognition – collective memory, abandoning the study of the past as a non-existent reality in favor of the study of ideas about it. In the multi-channel communication process, the formation of socio-epistemic arenas brings historical knowledge and historical memory together. Theoretical analysis. Socio-epistemic arenas are communication platforms for the production of historical knowledge developed by professional scientists, «smart crowds» and digital technologies in collective work formats. Participants in socio-epistemic arenas carry out distributed cognition, which is associated with the social context and collective memory, as it involves the inclusion of all previous experience of understanding historical reality in new interpretations of the past. Conclusion. The participation of the masses of Internet users in the study of History, who appropriate the results of collective research work, leads to the leveling of the boundaries between historical knowledge and historical memory. The principles of the rhetorical arenas of the communication space and civil science determine the structure of socio-epistemic arenas, the functioning of which is subordinated to the logic of the media.
23
Strazdina, Eva. „Archive Photography That Forms a Personal and Collective Memory“. International Journal of Smart Education and Urban Society 12, Nr. 3 (Juli 2021): 50–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/ijseus.2021070105.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Personal and family albums created by Latvians in the period from 1939 until the 1950s are placed in a wider social and historical perspective by analyzing its content, as well as the individual intent to create it. This work explores photography album as a tool to organize memories and how historical, personal photography albums serve and interact as evidence of private as well as a public past. The research tries to prove the historical authenticity in two personal albums created by Latvians during the Second World War and the following years – a visual diary illustrating the imprisonment in the Soviet working camp in Siberia and a family album memorializing the way and life of the Latvian refugees in the Alt Garge camp, Germany. Two personal albums (currently stored at the archive of the Museum of Occupation of Latvia) have become objects of historical value and are an informative source for learning, analyzing and educating about historical events.
24
Sellato, Bernard. „Collective Memory and Nomadism: Ethno-Historical Investigations in Borneo“. Indonesia 57 (April 1993): 155. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3351246.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
25
Rifkin, Mark. „Jeffrey Andrew Barash. Collective Memory and the Historical Past.“ American Historical Review 123, Nr. 3 (30.05.2018): 907–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ahr/123.3.907.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
26
Radzik, Linda. „Historical Memory as Forward- and Backward-Looking Collective Responsibility“. Midwest Studies In Philosophy 38, Nr. 1 (September 2014): 26–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/misp.12014.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
27
Ionov, Igor. „Social Framework of Collective Memory and Cognitive Problems of Historical Knowledge“. ISTORIYA 12, Nr. 8 (106) (2021): 0. http://dx.doi.org/10.18254/s207987840016463-8.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
The article demonstrates that the cognitive possibilities of historical memory and “living history”, which generates the agenda, questionnaires and source strategies of historians, are closely connected with the social framework of historical memory and, accordingly, with the self-identification of historians. They form cognitive maps that regulate the cognitive activity of a historian. It is shown that the social framework of historical memory within the crisis of globalization is changing rapidly, creating unusual, contradictory and sometimes absurd constellations. This topic is studied in the context of the history of discursive hegemony in historical memory by analyzing the ideas of A. Assmann, J. Laroche, A. Cento Bull and H. L. Hansen, who criticize the current state of historical memory and suggest new versions of it, based on the change of social frameworks and forms of discourse. The project of cosmopolitan memory created by the latter, its advantages and disadvantages are evaluated. The tools of analysis are N. Elias's theory of “civilization process”, G. Bateson's theory of schismogenesis, E. Erikson's theory of self-identification, E. N. Shulga's concept of pre-understanding. It is shown that cosmopolitan memory, while remaining within the framework of hegemonic discourse, reproduces antagonistic forms of memory. The most productive are the approaches of A. Assmann and S. Conrad, who carefully criticize the situation of cosmopolitan memory, seem to be the most productive. Cultural and historiographical processes in Germany, the British Empire and Southeast Asia served as the main material for the study. The works of N. Ferguson, close to the imperial historical school and the neo-Asianism (reorientalism) of Lee Kuan Yew, in which the values of empire, colonialism and traditionalism are defended in opposition to the ideal of human rights, have been analyzed. It is noted that historians strive to distinguish between the universalism of the idea of humanity and cultural pluralism in dialogue about human rights, which prevents criticism of alien or seemingly alien values outside a situation of cooperation and consensus. The ideal of cross historical memory as the historian's optimal cognitive tool is put forward.
28
Richardot, Sophie. „Appropriation des Savoirs et Mémoire Collective“. Swiss Journal of Psychology 72, Nr. 2 (Januar 2013): 71–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.1024/1421-0185/a000099.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
The aim of this study is to understand to what extent soliciting collective memory facilitates the appropriation of knowledge. After being informed about Milgram’s experiment on obedience to authority, students were asked to mention historical or contemporary events that came to mind while thinking about submission to authority. Main results of the factorial analysis show that the students who do not believe in the reproducibility of the experimental results oppose dramatic past events to a peaceful present, whereas those who do believe in the reproducibility of the results also mention dramatic contemporary events, thus linking past and present. Moreover, the students who do not accept the results for today personify historical events, whereas those who fully accept them generalize their impact. Therefore, according to their attitude toward this objet of knowledge, the students refer to two kinds of memory: a “closed memory,” which tends to relegate Milgram’s results to ancient history; and an “open memory,” which, on the contrary, transforms past events into a concept that helps them understand the present. Soliciting collective memory may contribute to the appropriation of knowledge provided the memory activated is an “open” one, linking past to present and going beyond the singularity of the event.
29
Yang, Qingying. „Revitalize the collective memory corridor of historical streets and alleys: Taking the spatial regeneration of Suzhou Road, Shinan District, Qingdao as an example“. Highlights in Science, Engineering and Technology 28 (31.12.2022): 338–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.54097/hset.v28i.4198.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
As an important element of urban historical space, historical streets and alleys contain rich regional historical and cultural information. The collective memory of historical streets and alleys is the precious resource of urban heritage, which carries the process of spatial change of streets and alleys. Based on the historical streets in the collective memory as the starting point to cut into the Qingdao districts of suzhou road historical streets space regeneration, focusing as memory element memories crowd, memory, and memory space, and the memory elements are translated into memory Spaces, and on this basis, try to use according to the different characteristics of memory Spaces to combination, and the corresponding space on the streets, Finally, using the interface transformation to complete the whole memory activation method to regenerate the streets of Suzhou Road. In order to provide reference for the protection of suzhou road historical streets and lanes, and to help the continuation and development of similar streets and lanes heritage space.
30
Holden, Anca. „Remembering and Memorializing German-Romanian Gulag Victims in the USSR through Historical Documents and Historical Fiction“. University of Bucharest Review. Literary and Cultural Studies Series 11, Nr. 2 (Oktober 2021): 103–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.31178/ubr.11.2.8.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
This paper examines the memory of the Romanian-German victims of the Soviet Gulag as recorded in recent collections of testimonies and interviews, a museum exhibition, an audio-visual documentary project, and Herta Müller’s 2009 novel Atemschaukel. It employs Alexander Etkind’s notions of “soft memory” and “hard memory” to discuss some of the key historical and political events that have impeded the establishing of consensual remembrance policies of the Soviet Gulag in communist Romania. I show how both German and Romanian communities since 1990 have memorialized the Gulag and discuss Atemschaukel as a legitimate impulse to document both personal and collective trauma of the second and subsequent generations. I argue that in the absence of a crystallized, hard memory, the historical documents and the historical fiction analyzed serve as viable examples of soft memory that succeed in memorializing the forced labor camps experience in its collective and individual forms.
31
Virnyk, Olga. „PRECEDENT NAMES AS TRANSMITTERS OF HISTORICAL AND COLLECTIVE MEMORY IN THE POEM “THE TIME IN BURSA” BY A. H. TANPINAR“. Scientific Journal of Polonia University 65, Nr. 4 (05.11.2024): 124–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.23856/6514.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
This article explores the use of precedent names as carriers of historical and collective memory in A. H. Tanpınar's poem “The Time in Bursa.” Precedent names, being culturally significant proper nouns, evoke historical, cultural, and social connotations that resonate deeply within a collective consciousness. The study analyzes how these names serve as linguistic bridges between past and present, shaping a shared understanding of national identity and heritage in Tanpınar’s poetry. The analysis focuses on the poem's ability to transmit cultural memory through names associated with key historical events, figures, and places, thus linking personal memory with collective historical narratives. By exploring the poetic function of these precedent names, the article highlights Tanpınar’s contribution to preserving and enriching the cultural identity of Turkish society. Employing methods such as textual, intertextual, and historical-linguistic analysis, the research uncovers how Tanpınar’s use of precedent names fosters a dialogue between individual and national history, allowing readers to engage with the collective memory of their community. The study positions precedent names not merely as literary devices, but as pivotal elements in understanding the dynamics of memory and identity in Turkish poetry. This research aims to broaden the understanding of how names rooted in cultural and historical significance can function as powerful transmitters of collective memory, contributing to the formation of a cohesive national identity in literary texts.
32
Vitkus, Hektoras. „Historical Memory and the Holocaust: Perception of the Problem“. Genocidas ir rezistencija 1, Nr. 17 (03.03.2025): 51–65. https://doi.org/10.61903/gr.2005.103.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
The relationship of historical memory to the problem of the Holocaust has affected the strategies of Lithuanian historical consciousness. Interactionalist and functionalist conceptions may be applied to reveal this aspect of their relationship. First, emphasis is placed on the possibilities for the conformity of historical memory and the problem of the Holocaust; second, on the modalities of these possibilities which affect how historical memory is formed: that is, the conflicting individual, group or collective interests, their cooperation, dominance and antagonisms. Both concepts might reveal the characteristics of the Holocaust in individual, collective and public forms of historical memory which are less well-known in Lithuania. The most important characteristics of the relationship of the Holocaust and historical memory become clear in the interaction between the individual and public historical memory. It may be approached by both quantitative and qualitative methodologies. These methods are the way to better understand and systemize the consistent patterns of cultural policy of historical memory. The relationship of the historical memory and the Holocaust, both in Lithuania and in other societies, may be defined by three principles of historicism: recognizing the differences of various epochs, searching for the context, and insight into the process of historical development. These perspectives disclose the effects of the historical consciousness which distort historical memory of the Holocaust: references to tradition, nostalgia, the belief in progress. These phenomena manifest themselves in the society's "crises of the historical memory" caused by the problem of the Holocaust. In these "crises" we see the strategies of historicizing negative experience that are common to the individual, group or collective historical memory: the stress on the anonymous, categorization, normalization, moralization, emphasizing aesthetics and specialization. These aspects can help us predict the scenarios of possible changes in the historical memory of the Holocaust.
33
Kilimova, L. V., und M. D. Cherkashin. „Historical memory as a resource for consolidation of society: problems and prospects of research“. Proceedings of the Southwest State University. Series: Economics. Sociology. Management 14, Nr. 6 (24.01.2025): 237–50. https://doi.org/10.21869/2223-1552-2024-14-6-237-250.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Relevance. The advancement of the problem of historical memory to the register of topical objects of social science is mainly due to the challenges of modernity. Today, historical memory is a factor that determines the nature of collective ideas about the past, the assessment of current events and the vision of the strategy for the future development of society. The research direction of memory studies is becoming increasingly popular, which actualizes the value of analyzing the mechanisms of the formation of collective memory and the features of its influence on the development of social relations, processes, and values.The purpose of the work is to substantiate the mechanism of constructive influence of historical memory on consolidation of society.Objectives: to analyze the content of the category "historical memory"; to determine its role in strengthening social consolidation and identity in the context of global changes.Methodology. The methodological basis of the article is: a systemic method that allows identifying the functional features of historical memory in modern Russian society; analysis and synthesis - to identify the essence and specificity of historical memory; theoretical generalization - to summarize the results of the study.Results. The theoretical substantiation of the category of historical memory, its place in the structure of collective memory, the mechanisms of its formation and factors contributing to the processes of memorization and forgetting, on the basis of which the socio-political processes of the formation of historical memory occur, are carried out.Conclusions. Historical memory plays one of the leading roles in the process of consolidation of society, ensures its existence and functioning, as well as the ability to communicate. Awareness of the common past, involvement in it creates empathy between members of society, makes the existence of the state possible, consolidates actions for the sake of the future. It is shown that historical memory includes not only achievements and victories, but also tragedies of the history of society. Recognition and understanding of collective trauma can contribute to the holistic restoration of society and the prevention of repetition of past mistakes.
34
Kyrchanoff, M. W. „Old Believers as a (f)actor in the transformation of contemporary Russian historical policy and memorial culture“. Russian Journal of Church History 4, Nr. 2 (05.06.2023): 4–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.15829/2686-973x-2023-128.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
The features of development and the main vectors of the transformation of historical memory of the Old Believer segment of modern Russian society are analyzed. It is shown that the Old Believer intellectuals are active in the formation of their own versions of the collective historical memory. The author analyzes the perception of community experience by Old Believer intellectuals in collective memory, constructed the concepts of "self" and "sacrifice". The grand narrative used in writing the history of the Old Believers is analyzed also. It is considered how the culture of memory of the Russian Old Believers actualizes the political and ideological contradictions of society, actualizing collective historical traumas and images of the Other in the memorial spaces. It is shown that the model of the collective memory of the Old Believers stimulates the development of the politics of memory in a religiously-centric coordinate system, where the Church itself and its figures are imagined as the main participants in the historical process, becoming objects of memorial reflection and symbolic canonization in the identity of the Old Believers.
35
Mačiulis, Dangiras. „Vaižgantas’s Attempts at Constructing Lithuanian Collective Memory“. Colloquia 44 (02.06.2020): 47–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.51554/col.2020.28621.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
By analyzing the written legacy of Juozas Tumas-Vaižgantas, the author of the article discusses his activities in forming Lithuanian collective memory. He argues that Vaižgantas‘s point of view towards the importance of collective memory in the life of the Lithuanian people has changed under the influence of political circumstances. Up until WWI, Vaižgantas thought that in order to consolidate the Lithuanian national community, the mother tongue would serve better than constructing collective memory by ways of reminding Lithuanians of the heroic episodes of their country‘s history. During the WWI, in his attempts at validating the right of Lithuanians to political and cultural emancipation, Vaižgantas began using the images of the Grand Duchy of Lithuania which were reminiscent of the Lithuanian historical statehood. In the late 1920s, Vaižgantas actively participated in the organization of the jubilee campaign of remembrance of the Grand Duke of Lithuania, Vytautas the Great (1350-1430). He believed that the actualization of the memory of the statehood of the GDL, symbolized by the personality of Vytautas the Great, could help to highlight the tradition of Lithuanian historical statehood and cultural continuity.
36
Repinetskaya, Yuliya Solomonovna. „To the question of the concepts of «historical consciousness» and «historical memory»“. Samara Journal of Science 6, Nr. 1 (01.03.2017): 147–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.17816/snv201761214.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
The article defines the concepts historical consciousness and historical memory which are studied by many social sciences and are termed differently. The author indicates multiplicity of social memory as a process. Besides the public (social) memory the author distinguishes cultural memory (researched, especially recent); collective memory (faced and meaningful common experiences living together); individual memory (represented experience); historical memory, etc. Historical consciousness and historical memory are the terms that take a key position in the theory and methodology of historical science. The author of the article also draws attention to the analysis of the approaches of contemporary scientists L.P. Repina and Maurice Halbwachs (the founder of the theory of historical memory (1877-1945) to the interpretation of the problem. The essence of historical consciousness and memory is characterized, public consciousness is distinguished. The author draws attention to such an important aspect of the problem as identifying complex concepts-synonyms appearing in the theory and methodology of historical science like historical consciousness and historical memory. Special emphasis is made on showing dialectical unity concepts mentioned above.
37
Tsarina, Maria A. „The Study of Historical Memory in the Modern System of Humanitarian Knowledge“. IZVESTIYA VUZOV SEVERO-KAVKAZSKII REGION SOCIAL SCIENCE, Nr. 2 (214) (30.06.2022): 76–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.18522/2687-0770-2022-2-76-84.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Relevance. This article discusses topical issues regarding the definition of such a concept as “memory studies”. This phenomenon is considered in a historical retrospective of modern Russian historiography. The main approaches to the definition of the following terms are analyzed: “memory studies”, “place of memory”, “historical memoryˮ, “social memory”, “collective memory”, “cultural memory”. This paper provides an overview of the main directions of Russian historiography in line with the latest research devoted to the study of such a phenomenon as “memory studies”. The purpose on the basis of the materials studied, to determine the most complete and clearly expressed definition of such a phenomenon and concept as “memory studies”. Objectives. to consider the main scientific works devoted to this issue, to analyze the totality of research in the field of studying Russian memory studies. To reveal the essence of the concept: “memory studies” in Russian historiography. Methodology. In the process of working on the study, the following research methods were used: comparison, analysis, synthesis, generalization, analogy. Results. The development of this problem contributes to a deeper study of such a phenomenon as “memory studies”. This work reveals the essence and main directions in the study of memory studies in Russian historiography and gives one of the definitions of this phenomenon in the modern system of humanitarian knowledge. Conclusion. The construct “memory studies” itself is practically not found in academic works. This concept is closest to the concept: “historical memory” which most accurately reflects the general collective ideas, where the main meaning-forming construct is “memory”. The concept of memory plays a key role here.
38
van der Poel, Stefan. „Memory crisis: The Shoah within a collective European memory“. Journal of European Studies 49, Nr. 3-4 (12.08.2019): 267–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0047244119859180.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
This paper analyses the memory crisis resulting from conflicting perceptions of the Shoah in Western and Central Europe. To clarify this memory crisis, crucial aspects of these divergent perceptions will be discussed. From the Western perspective, there is a strong tendency to underline the universal meaning and importance of the Shoah, and to institutionalize this in UN and EU resolutions and declarations. From an Eastern perspective, this process of globalizing Shoah discourse is often considered to be a Western preoccupation and as just another mechanism to promulgate further Western cultural domination. In Central Europe the supposed singularity of the Shoah is not only often doubted, but the focus is shifted far more on to processing communism and identity-based policies. To clarify and illustrate how the Shoah is reflected on in historical debates and the public domain, recent Polish and Hungarian monuments, museums, literature and films are discussed.
39
Cvetkova, I. V., und O. S. Evchenko. „Динамическая структура коллективной памяти с позиций методологии социального конструктивизма“. Вестник Вятского государственного университета, Nr. 1(147) (07.08.2023): 20–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.25730/vsu.7606.23.002.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
The relevance of the work is due to the development of a new scientific direction related to the study of collective memory, Memory Studies. Philosophers, historians, sociologists, cultural scientists, and political scientists take part in the development of this interdisciplinary direction. As research has been carried out in various fields, many terms have appeared describing the phenomenon of collective memory, for example, "historical memory", "social memory", "political memory" and so on. Memory Studies is considered as a field of knowledge that acts as an alternative to the "traditional" historical science. The purpose of the article is to describe the structure of collective memory in the context of the methodology of constructivism. The advantage of this approach is that it makes it possible to study the structural elements of collective memory, to identify the mechanisms of its functioning in social life. As a methodological basis for the analysis, the concept of the American philosopher J. Searle, in which the perception of society is constructed with the help of social and objective facts. Historical facts, which are the result of scientific research, have a certain impact on collective memory. For historical science, collective memory is an object of critical analysis, and not a solid basis for conclusions. In constructivism, the formation of collective memory is considered as the creation of social facts based on ideal objects, intentionality and constitutive rules. This structure of social facts is used in the work to describe the mechanisms of collective memory. The formation of ideal objects takes place on the basis of a selective attitude to the events of the past. At the level of individual experience, information about the past is recorded using the means of communication and becomes available not only to eyewitnesses of events, but also to other members of the community. The processes of intentionality create a general idea of the events of the past in the form of a narrative, which are used to form an identity. Constitutive rules are used to manage collective memory in order to solve political problems. Thus, collective memory from the standpoint of constructivism is considered as a dynamic structure that changes under the influence of social factors of modern social life. Актуальность работы обусловлена развитием нового научного направления, связанного с изучением коллективной памяти, Memory Studies. В развитии данного междисциплинарного направления принимают участие философы, историки, социологи, культурологи, политологи. По мере проведения исследований в различных областях появилось множество терминов, описывающих феномен коллективной памяти, например, «историческая память», «социальная память», «политическая память» и так далее. Memory Studies рассматривается как область знаний, которая выступает в качестве альтернативы по отношению к «традиционной» исторической науке. Цель статьи состоит в описании структуры коллективной памяти в контексте методологии конструктивизма. Преимущество такого подхода состоит в том, что он дает возможность изучить структурные элементы коллективной памяти, выявить механизмы ее функционирования в социальной жизни. В качестве методологической основы анализа использована концепция американского философа Дж. Серла, в которой восприятие общества конструируется при помощи социальных и объективных фактов. Исторические факты, которые являются результатом научных исследований, оказывают определенное влияние на коллективную память. Для исторической науки коллективная память выступает объектом критического анализа, а не прочным основанием для выводов. В конструктивизме формирование коллективной памяти рассматривается как создание социальных фактов на основе идеальных объектов, интенциональности и конститутивных правил. Данная структура социальных фактов использована в работе для описания механизмов коллективной памяти. Формирование идеальных объектов происходит на основе избирательного отношения к событиям прошлого. На уровне индивидуального опыта информация о прошлом фиксируется при помощи средств коммуникации и становится достоянием не только очевидцев событий, но также других членов сообщества. Процессы интенциональности создают общее представление о событиях прошлого в форме нарратива, которые используются для формирования идентичности. Конститутивные правила применяются для управления коллективной памятью в целях решения политических задач. Таким образом, коллективная память с позиций конструктивизма рассматривается как динамическая структура, которая меняется под влиянием социальных факторов современной общественной жизни.
40
Bratu, Georgeta-Cristiana. „Collective Memory in Diplomacy and Interantional Relations“. SAECULUM 55, Nr. 1 (01.07.2023): 41–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/saec-2023-0004.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Abstract This paper looks at the theoretical and operational underpinnings of empirical endeavors aimed at assessing the impact of collective memory on the relationship between states. It reviews the literature dedicated to the concept of “collective” memory and its operationalization. The discusssion on the operationalization of this concept reveals the importance of the “infrastructure of memory” that political and cultural elites (“the critical community”) set up in order to keep the memory alive. There is a limited body of literature that focuses on the use of memory in diplomacy and international relations, but this author argues that, properly framed, an investigation of the impact the memory of a specific historical event has on bilateral relationship is worthwhile pursuing.
41
Lembeck, Karl-Heinz. „Geschichte zwischen Erinnerung und Phantasie / History between Memory and Fantasy“. Gestalt Theory 39, Nr. 2-3 (27.11.2017): 215–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/gth-2017-0016.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Summary This article refers on a recent discussion with the question of the relationship between individual memory and collective history. It is claimed a constitutive role of memory in history. This thesis is examined on the basis of the question according to the value of the autobiography as a historical source. It is shown here that a reference to the collective history is already guaranteed in the relationship between memory and narrative. Four observations shall justify the arguments, they concern (i) the role of intuition in historical narrative, (ii) the relationship between historical actor and his deeds, (iii) the transcendence of memory, and (iv) the role of fiction in the historical narrative. The last observation leads at the end on the role of fantasy in the historical memory.
42
Olick, Jeffrey K., und Joyce Robbins. „Social Memory Studies: From “Collective Memory” to the Historical Sociology of Mnemonic Practices“. Annual Review of Sociology 24, Nr. 1 (August 1998): 105–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1146/annurev.soc.24.1.105.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
43
Garagozov, Rauf. „Characteristics of Collective Memory, Ethnic Conflicts, Historiography, and the "Politics of Memory": Characteristics of historical accounts and "forms" of collective memory“. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology 46, Nr. 2 (März 2008): 58–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.2753/rpo1061-0405460202.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
44
Kubik, Jan. „Historical Memory and the End of Communism“. Journal of Cold War Studies 9, Nr. 2 (April 2007): 127–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/jcws.2007.9.2.127.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
In critiquing a recent book by Charity Scribner, Requiem for Communism, this article addresses fundamental questions about collective memories of Communism and the Soviet bloc: Why and how is “the past” remembered selectively? What happens when forgotten events are brought back to the fore of collective consciousness? What are the actual mechanisms of remembering? Who are the often invisible gatekeepers that direct the paths of our memories? Who are the influential rulers of memory attempting to shape our mnemonic repertoire? Scribner's book indirectly touches on these issues, though not in a fully satisfactory way, especially with regard to working-class life under Communism. Although the book does have some strong points, it too often fails to take account of how people in the region (as opposed to leftist intellectuals in the West who “knew” Communism vicariously) experienced manual labor during the Communist era and how they remember it now.
45
Kornyushchenko-Ermolaeva, N. S. „Megill: the Danger of Sacralizing Memory“. Tempus et Memoria 3, Nr. 1 (2022): 55–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.15826/tetm.2022.3.031.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
The article discusses the relationship between memory and historical science in the concept of historical epistemology by American historian Allan Megill. Based on the analysis done, the danger of the process of sacralization of historical memory is shown. The article discusses the issue of consequences arising with the increase in the value of collective historical memory.
46
Jewsiewicki, Bogumil. „Collective Memory and the Stakes of Power. A Reading of Popular Zairian Historical Discourses“. History in Africa 13 (1986): 195–223. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3171542.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
For me collective memory is neither a narrative nor collective knowledge of the past (a sort of historical consensus). Contrary to past accounts, be they public or private, memory does not have a narrative form and is thus not of the literary kind (oral or written). Collective memory is above all a semantic code of memorization and of rememorization; it is, as well, a hierarchy of values which structures a discourse in the past while rooting it in the present. Collective memory gives meaning to the past and bears in mind certain places, facts, dates, and persons around which the memory or memories which also legitimate power build themselves. The relationship between a particular remembrance and its basic facts finds its prime meaning here. In this sense collective memory supports and rationalizes collective identity and, contrary to social fiction, offers a “definitive” reading as it bears on real, even though elapsed, relationships. Collective memory thus rejoins and often reinforces fiction and supports role and behavioral stereotypes, etc.“En ce temps là le roi regardant dans sa maison à Bruxelles il étudiait les nouvelles venant de l'Afrique et dans ses nouvelles plusieurs tribus ont montré que les vivres et les matériaux de travail (n'arrivaient) pas à temps après l'expédition de l'Europe et le Roi Léopold II jetta un coup d'oeil sur l'Atlas (carte géographique) du pays et il dit: on trouvera la route pour faire passer les matériaux de travail, un racourci pour faire le chemin de fer rapidement pour que je puisse envoyer plus rapidement les matériaux en Afrique ainsi on aura pas besoins de porteurs.
47
Vodenko, Konstantin V., Ivan F. Denisenko, Valentina I. Rodionova, Lyudmila I. Makadei und Natalia N. Voloskova. „The role of historical memory in the process of social consolidation in applied linguistic educational space of the region“. LAPLAGE EM REVISTA 7, Nr. 3D (14.10.2021): 502–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.24115/s2446-6220202173d1741p.502-510.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
The article analyzes historical memory as a source for consolidating the applied linguistic educational space. We concluded that the resource of historical memory in development of regional educational space is a socially consolidating factor, since, regardless of the social and cultural capital, it strengthens the collective spatial identity and awareness of belonging (as a historically established socio-territorial community). We considered the role of historical memory in development of the social investment model of regional management as well and concluded that systematic studies of the problems require the use of a multidimensional sociological construct (which is still waiting to be implemented), but it is clear that historical memory is most constructively interpreted not in the context of tradition, but as a cultural symbolic code of the regional management system (if it does not manifest itself in its pure form and includes selection of historical memory elements for solving managerial tasks).
48
Ahmed, Mayada Hashim. „Applying Marxist Hermeneutics of the Visions of Shakespeare“. Cross-Currents: An International Peer-Reviewed Journal on Humanities & Social Sciences 5, Nr. 7 (29.07.2019): 241–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.36344/ccijhss.2019.v05i07.009.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
This paper examines some of the theoretical foundations of historical processes in the application of the Shakespeare vision, through which plays became the actual collective memory of the events they envision, even when those events are distorted. The debate over this distortion has focused on the possible political motives for applying Shakespeare. That this application on political intention, with official powers largely ignored the impact of these historical distortions was over 400 years later. I suggest that, because of Shakespeare's unique place in the historical calendar for the development of collective memory, Shakespeare's historical twisting application in history plays is a byproduct of the emerging ability to access historical sources while also shaping the emerging collective memory. Shakespeare became archon, in the sense of the Deriding, of English history. As such he exercised an interpretation of Areton's right to interpret English history.
49
Ahmed, Mayada Hashim. „Applying Marxist Hermeneutics of the Visions of Shakespeare“. Cross-Currents: An International Peer-Reviewed Journal on Humanities & Social Sciences 5, Nr. 7 (29.07.2019): 241–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.36344/ccijhss.2019.v05i07.009.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
This paper examines some of the theoretical foundations of historical processes in the application of the Shakespeare vision, through which plays became the actual collective memory of the events they envision, even when those events are distorted. The debate over this distortion has focused on the possible political motives for applying Shakespeare. That this application on political intention, with official powers largely ignored the impact of these historical distortions was over 400 years later. I suggest that, because of Shakespeare's unique place in the historical calendar for the development of collective memory, Shakespeare's historical twisting application in history plays is a byproduct of the emerging ability to access historical sources while also shaping the emerging collective memory. Shakespeare became archon, in the sense of the Deriding, of English history. As such he exercised an interpretation of Areton's right to interpret English history.
50
Méndez Casas, Lander, Stefano Cavalli, Sofián El-Astal, José Joaquín Alberto Pizarro Carrasco, Sonia Geni Padoan Moura, Saioa Telletxea Artzamendi und Darío Alexander Páez Rovira. „Collective memory and social representations of history in Americas, Europe and Palestine“. Revista de Psicología 41, Nr. 2 (14.07.2023): 1023–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.18800/psico.202302.014.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
This article reviews and synthesizes 10 free-recall studies on collective memory carried out in Latin America, Europe, and Palestine. Results show the high prevalence of the topics of politics, collective violence and warfare, but around 50% of recalled events were appraised as positives, disconfirming a negative bias in collective memory. However, in Palestine most of the events were entirely or partially negative, reflecting country’s conflictual situation. The analyzed studies confirm a partial socio-centrism: in Latin America and Palestine most events were national. A meta-analysis confirms a generational effect in 24/100 historical events. Negative historical events were related to low social wellbeing in Palestine. Results are discussed in the framework of collective memory processes and social representations of history.