Zeitschriftenartikel zum Thema „- Criticism and interpretation“
Geben Sie eine Quelle nach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard und anderen Zitierweisen an
Machen Sie sich mit Top-50 Zeitschriftenartikel für die Forschung zum Thema "- Criticism and interpretation" bekannt.
Neben jedem Werk im Literaturverzeichnis ist die Option "Zur Bibliographie hinzufügen" verfügbar. Nutzen Sie sie, wird Ihre bibliographische Angabe des gewählten Werkes nach der nötigen Zitierweise (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver usw.) automatisch gestaltet.
Sie können auch den vollen Text der wissenschaftlichen Publikation im PDF-Format herunterladen und eine Online-Annotation der Arbeit lesen, wenn die relevanten Parameter in den Metadaten verfügbar sind.
Sehen Sie die Zeitschriftenartikel für verschiedene Spezialgebieten durch und erstellen Sie Ihre Bibliographie auf korrekte Weise.
Syahputra, Fikry Prastya. „Meme Ideational Meaning: Multimodal Interpretation“. Talenta Conference Series: Local Wisdom, Social, and Arts (LWSA) 1, Nr. 1 (17.10.2018): 022–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.32734/lwsa.v1i1.136.
Rabbany T, Al-Faiz M., und Indal Abror. „TAFSIR PROGRESIF ATAS KISAH-KISAH DALAM AL-QUR’AN KARYA EKO PRASETYO“. Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Hadis 19, Nr. 1 (12.10.2019): 85. http://dx.doi.org/10.14421/qh.2018.1901-05.
Zaret, David, und Michael Walzer. „Interpretation and Social Criticism“. Contemporary Sociology 17, Nr. 1 (Januar 1988): 122. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2069485.
Senchuk, Dennis M., und Michael Walzer. „Interpretation and Social Criticism.“ Noûs 26, Nr. 3 (September 1992): 389. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2215966.
Gorski, Philip S. „SCIENTISM, INTERPRETATION, AND CRITICISM“. Zygon� 25, Nr. 3 (September 1990): 279–307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.1990.tb00793.x.
Rosen, Bernard. „Interpretation and Social Criticism“. Journal of Higher Education 59, Nr. 6 (November 1988): 704–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1988.11780237.
Rosen, Bernard, und Michael Walzer. „Interpretation and Social Criticism“. Journal of Higher Education 59, Nr. 6 (November 1988): 704. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1982241.
CAN GÜRBÜZ, Gülsevim. „Araştırıcı Sanat Eleştirisi ve Bir Sanat Eleştirisi Örneği“. Journal of Social Research and Behavioral Sciences 7, Nr. 14 (10.12.2021): 150–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.52096/jsrbs.7.14.7.
Morrow, Jeffrey L. „The Politics of Biblical Interpretation: A ‘Criticism of Criticism’“. New Blackfriars 91, Nr. 1035 (12.08.2010): 528–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2005.2009.01342.x.
Green, Joel B. „Rethinking "History" for Theological Interpretation“. Journal of Theological Interpretation 5, Nr. 2 (2011): 159–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/26421422.
Green, Joel B. „Rethinking "History" for Theological Interpretation“. Journal of Theological Interpretation 5, Nr. 2 (2011): 159–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/jtheointe.5.2.0159.
Rosenberg, Ruth, und Jerome J. McGann. „Textual Criticism and Literary Interpretation“. South Central Review 3, Nr. 4 (1986): 119. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3189693.
John, Helen C. „Conversations in Context: Cross-Cultural (Grassroots) Biblical Interpretation Groups Challenging Western-centric (Professional) Biblical Interpretation“. Biblical Interpretation 27, Nr. 1 (11.03.2019): 36–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15685152-00271p03.
Ridwan, MK. „TRADISI KRITIK TAFSIR: Diskursus Kritisisme Penafsiran dalam Wacana Qur’anic Studies“. Jurnal THEOLOGIA 28, Nr. 1 (14.09.2017): 55. http://dx.doi.org/10.21580/teo.2017.28.1.1418.
Scholz, Gunther. „Are text interpretations fictions?“ Semiotic studies 2, Nr. 4 (28.12.2022): 44–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.18287/2782-2966-2022-2-4-44-52.
Davies, Paul, Greta Gaard und Patrick D. Murphy. „Ecofeminist Literary Criticism: Theory, Interpretation, Pedagogy“. Modern Language Review 95, Nr. 4 (Oktober 2000): 1174. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3736723.
Woodward, Michael. „Dictionary of Biblical Criticism and Interpretation“. Theological Librarianship 2, Nr. 1 (27.04.2009): 113–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.31046/tl.v2i1.74.
Robbins, Vernon K. „New Testament Interpretation through Rhetorical Criticism“. Rhetorica 3, Nr. 2 (1985): 145–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/rh.1985.3.2.145.
Fowler, Robert M., und George A. Kennedy. „New Testament Interpretation through Rhetorical Criticism“. Journal of Biblical Literature 105, Nr. 2 (Juni 1986): 328. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/3260415.
Slater, Niall W. „‘Against Interpretation’: Petronius and art Criticism“. Ramus 16, Nr. 1-2 (1987): 165–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0048671x00003295.
Herbert, T. Walter, Roberta Rubenstein und Amy Schrager Lang. „Feminist Literary Criticism and Cultural Interpretation“. American Quarterly 39, Nr. 4 (1987): 656. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2713134.
Evans, R. L. S., und George A. Kennedy. „New Testament Interpretation through Rhetorical Criticism“. Classical World 80, Nr. 3 (1987): 222. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/4350026.
Arutynyan, J. I. „Contemporary art criticism: judgment and interpretation“. Vestnik of Saint Petersburg State University of Culture, Nr. 1 (30) (März 2017): 177–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.30725/2619-0303-2020-3-177-180.
Perry, John Oliver, und G. N. Devy. „Indian Literary Criticism: Theory and Interpretation“. World Literature Today 77, Nr. 1 (2003): 95. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/40157830.
Dietrich, Richard S. „Book Review: Interpretation and Social Criticism“. Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 42, Nr. 3 (Juli 1988): 310–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002096438804200315.
Taylor, James E. „Hume on Miracles: Interpretation and Criticism“. Philosophy Compass 2, Nr. 4 (Juli 2007): 611–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-9991.2007.00088.x.
Wathani, Syamsul. „KRITIK SALIM AL-JAbI ATAS HERMENEUTIKA MUHAMMAD SYAHRUR“. el-'Umdah 1, Nr. 2 (01.12.2018): 145–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.20414/el-umdah.v1i2.550.
Sitanggang, Nadya Utari Boru. „An Examination on Edip Yuksel's Interpretation of Q. 4:34“. Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Hadis 18, Nr. 2 (02.07.2017): 275. http://dx.doi.org/10.14421/qh.2017.1802-07.
Sládecek, Michal. „What does the „bedrock“ of rules consist of? Mcdowell on Kripke’s and Wright’s interpretation of Wittgenstein“. Theoria, Beograd 55, Nr. 4 (2012): 5–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/theo1204005s.
JEON, Kyung-Jin. „A Criticism of Immoralistic Interpretation of Nietzsche“. Journal of the Daedong Philosophical Association 77 (31.12.2016): 23–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.20539/deadong.2016.77.02.
JEON, Kyung-Jin. „A Criticism of Immoralistic Interpretation of Nietzsche“. Journal of the Daedong Philosophical Association 77 (31.12.2016): 23–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.20539/deadong.2016.77.2.
Jabborova, Dilafruz. „Interpretation of Fitrat Dramas in Literary Criticism“. International Journal for Research in Applied Science and Engineering Technology 9, Nr. 12 (31.12.2021): 2437–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.22214/ijraset.2021.39332.
Pelias, Ronald J. „Schools of interpretation thought and performance criticism“. Southern Speech Communication Journal 50, Nr. 4 (Dezember 1985): 348–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10417948509372640.
NANNICELLI, TED. „Ethical Criticism and the Interpretation of Art“. Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 75, Nr. 4 (Oktober 2017): 401–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/jaac.12395.
Kaufman, Daniel A. „Interpretation and the “Investigative” Concept of Criticism“. Angelaki 17, Nr. 1 (März 2012): 3–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0969725x.2012.671635.
West, David W. „Practical Criticism: I.A. Richards' experiment in interpretation“. Changing English 9, Nr. 2 (Oktober 2002): 207–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/1358684022000006311.
Fry, Paul. „The New Metacriticisms and the Fate of Interpretation“. Modern Language Quarterly 81, Nr. 3 (01.09.2020): 267–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/00267929-8351507.
Wicaksono, Arif. „Pandangan Kekristenan Tentang Higher Criticism“. FIDEI: Jurnal Teologi Sistematika dan Praktika 1, Nr. 1 (23.06.2018): 115–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.34081/fidei.v1i1.6.
Armstrong, Chris. „Philosophical Interpretation in the Work of Michael Walzer“. Politics 20, Nr. 2 (Mai 2000): 87–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/1467-9256.00116.
Santosa, Puji. „KONDISI KRITIK SASTRA INDONESIA SEABAD H.B. JASSIN (Indonesia Literary Criticism in A Century of H. B. Jassin)“. Kandai 13, Nr. 1 (24.08.2017): 91. http://dx.doi.org/10.26499/jk.v13i1.94.
Brain, Michael. „Christ and the Church: Ephesians 4:8–10 as a Test of Theological Exegesis“. Pro Ecclesia: A Journal of Catholic and Evangelical Theology 28, Nr. 4 (November 2019): 418–31. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1063851219873162.
Moberly, R. W. L. „Biblical Criticism and Religious Belief“. Journal of Theological Interpretation 2, Nr. 1 (2008): 71–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/26421447.
Moberly, R. W. L. „Biblical Criticism and Religious Belief“. Journal of Theological Interpretation 2, Nr. 1 (2008): 71–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/jtheointe.2.1.0071.
Eigi, Jaana. „On the Social Nature of Objectivity: Helen Longino and Justin Biddle“. THEORIA. An International Journal for Theory, History and Foundations of Science 30, Nr. 3 (12.11.2015): 449–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1387/theoria.13208.
이재호. „An Interpretation of Criticism of Elementary Moral Instruction“. KOREAN ELEMENTARY MORAL EDUCATION SOCIETY ll, Nr. 31 (Dezember 2009): 117–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.17282/ethics.2009..31.117.
Song, Youngmog. „Textual Criticism and Interpretation of Matthew 23:26“. Journal of Biblical Text Research 50 (30.04.2022): 60–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.28977/jbtr.2022.4.50.60.
Sam-Yel Park. „Spinoza and Idealism -The Criticism of Idealistic Interpretation-“. Studies in Philosophy East-West ll, Nr. 49 (September 2008): 297–315. http://dx.doi.org/10.15841/kspew..49.200809.297.
Kermode, Frank. „Book Review: New Testament Interpretation Through Rhetorical Criticism“. Theology 88, Nr. 724 (Juli 1985): 309–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0040571x8508800422.
Körner, Jürgen. „Social criticism in the process of interpretation (discussion)“. International Forum of Psychoanalysis 2, Nr. 2 (Juli 1993): 115–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/08037069308412455.
Kingsbury, Jack Dean. „Book Review: New Testament Interpretation through Rhetorical Criticism“. Interpretation: A Journal of Bible and Theology 40, Nr. 1 (Januar 1986): 91–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002096438604000121.