Auswahl der wissenschaftlichen Literatur zum Thema „Mandatory rules of public law“
Geben Sie eine Quelle nach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard und anderen Zitierweisen an
Machen Sie sich mit den Listen der aktuellen Artikel, Bücher, Dissertationen, Berichten und anderer wissenschaftlichen Quellen zum Thema "Mandatory rules of public law" bekannt.
Neben jedem Werk im Literaturverzeichnis ist die Option "Zur Bibliographie hinzufügen" verfügbar. Nutzen Sie sie, wird Ihre bibliographische Angabe des gewählten Werkes nach der nötigen Zitierweise (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver usw.) automatisch gestaltet.
Sie können auch den vollen Text der wissenschaftlichen Publikation im PDF-Format herunterladen und eine Online-Annotation der Arbeit lesen, wenn die relevanten Parameter in den Metadaten verfügbar sind.
Zeitschriftenartikel zum Thema "Mandatory rules of public law":
Shulakov, A. A. „RUSSIAN FEDERATION PUBLIC POLICY INTERESTS AND INTERNATIONAL ADOPTION“. Lex Russica, Nr. 11 (22.11.2019): 56–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2019.156.11.056-069.
Pauknerová, Monika. „Mandatory rules and public policy in international contract law“. ERA Forum 11, Nr. 1 (März 2010): 29–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12027-010-0151-2.
Bansal, Sharad. „The Dampening Effect of Foreign Mandatory Laws“. Asian International Arbitration Journal 14, Issue 2 (01.12.2018): 165–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/aiaj2018009.
Zhilsov, A. N. „Mandatory and Public Policy Rules in International Commercial Arbitration“. Netherlands International Law Review 42, Nr. 01 (Mai 1995): 81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0165070x00003387.
Zamir, Eyal, und Ori Katz. „Do People Like Mandatory Rules? The Impact of Framing and Phrasing“. Law & Social Inquiry 45, Nr. 4 (12.05.2020): 1052–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/lsi.2020.7.
Pavić, Vladimir. „Bribery and International Commercial Arbitration – the Role of Mandatory Rules and Public Policy“. Victoria University of Wellington Law Review 43, Nr. 4 (01.12.2012): 661. http://dx.doi.org/10.26686/vuwlr.v43i4.5016.
Garcia Rolo, António. „Steering Companies Towards Policy Objectives Through Mandatory Disclosure Rules in EU Law“. European Company Law 19, Issue 2 (01.03.2022): 33–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/eucl2022006.
Agstner, Peter, und Davide Marchesini Mascheroni. „Breach of the Mandatory Bid Rule: Minority Shareholders’ Protection in the Public vs. Private Enforcement Debate“. European Company and Financial Law Review 17, Nr. 6 (01.12.2020): 726–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/ecfr-2020-0025.
MacNeil, Iain, und Alex Lau. „International Corporate Regulation: Listing Rules and Overseas Companies“. International and Comparative Law Quarterly 50, Nr. 4 (Oktober 2001): 787–810. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/iclq/50.4.787.
Badr, Yehya Ikram Ibrahim. „The Grounds for Setting Aside Arbitral Awards under the Egyptian Arbitration Code: Unresolved Choice of Law Issues and Unwanted Extraterritorialism“. Arab Law Quarterly 32, Nr. 1 (26.12.2018): 33–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15730255-12321004.
Dissertationen zum Thema "Mandatory rules of public law":
Saumier, Geneviève. „Public policy, mandatory rules and uniform choice-of-law rules in contract : the impact of European harmonization on English private international law“. Thesis, University of Cambridge, 1997. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.627212.
Montoya, Stahl Alfonso, und Jordán Fernando Loayza. „The mandatory determination of the Corporate Purpose: An outdated rule“. IUS ET VERITAS, 2016. http://repositorio.pucp.edu.pe/index/handle/123456789/122677.
En el presente artículo, los autores discuten la presunta utilidad como inconvenientes de la obligación de determinar el objeto social. En ese sentido, se analiza las características exigidas al objeto social, como los supuestos beneficios que traería su regulación. Los autores proponen la eliminación de la obligación de determinar el objeto social a fin de permitir a las sociedades configurar libremente su actividad, sin verse limitadas por una norma rígida.
Adel, Zaher Mina. „L'ordre public dans les relations privées internationales : l'exemple des contrats internationaux devant le juge étatique“. Thesis, Lyon, 2018. http://www.theses.fr/2018LYSE3057.
The freedom of choice is a principle referring to the freedom of the parties concerning the choice of the law ruling the international contract. However, this principle is limited by public policy, which reduce the extent of this freedom. In order to improve the application of these rules with a minimum of predictability, it is important to study in detail the origin and nature of the rules of public policy. A comparative study with Egyptian private international law is needed to take advantage from all current mechanisms. The current conceptual debate highlights the role of international cooperation, in addition to purely State interests, which will tend to create a new transnational, or even supranational, public policy
Latil, Cédric. „Intérêt public et lois de police en droit international privé“. Thesis, Aix-Marseille, 2015. http://www.theses.fr/2015AIXM1077.
Overriding mandatory provisions is traditionally defined as a provisions the respect for which is regarded as necessary by a country for safeguarding its political, social or economic organisation. Hence, the Courts apply the law of the forum automatically and do not apply their own conflit of rules. Definition is not precise enough to be used accurately. Therefore we propose to define concept of Overriding mandatory provisions focuses on the « Public Interest », which is derived from article 9, paragraph 1 of the regulation on the law applicable to the contractual obligations. In the following lines, we wonder about the mandatory implantation of these rules at the intrenational level. Our aim is to measure the impact of Public Interest in the conflict of laws and in the conflict of jurisdictions
Buruianã, Monica-Elena. „L'application de la loi étrangère en droit international privé“. Thesis, Bordeaux, 2016. http://www.theses.fr/2016BORD0067/document.
The national or the European private international law is taking into a particular accountthe foreign legal systems. The foreign law application is an expression of the attention given to the foreignlegal systems, but applying a law that belongs to a different legal system than the legal system of the forumcountry may provoke a defence reaction caused by the existing differences between the legal systemsinvolved. The foreign law application is therefore confronted to different obstacles that tend to ensure aprimary application of the lex fori. First, the techniques used by the legal system of the forum country toapply the foreign law are not entirely favourable to this kind of application, as evidenced by the recurrentintervention of the international public policy. Furthermore, there are elements that are exogenous to thelegal system of the forum country, such as different understandings of the same legal institution that canobstruct the foreign law application. There is thus a gap between the theory of the private internationalrules, which would appeal a frequent application of the foreign law, and the use that is made of them by theauthorities of the forum country, which often leads to the neutralization of the foreign law. This studydefends a better compliance to the theory of private international law, which would promote the applicationof the foreign law. In this perspective, the private international law of the European Union provides animportant source of « savoir-faire » as it promotes the application of a foreign law belonging to anotherMember States
Hedberg, Christoffer Coello. „International Commercial Arbitration and Money Laundering : Problems that arise and how they should be resolved“. Thesis, Uppsala universitet, Juridiska institutionen, 2016. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-299071.
Vodounon-Djegni, Comlan René. „L’exécution des sentences arbitrales contre les personnes publiques de l’OHADA“. Thesis, Université Côte d'Azur, 2022. http://www.theses.fr/2022COAZ0008.
The thesis focuses on " The execution of arbitral awards against public persons of OHADA ". Its purpose is to demonstrate how to implement these sentences without coming up against the immunity from execution of the persons who benefit from them. Indeed, in the absence of an arbitration exception, the prohibition of forced execution and interim measures against these persons seems to extend to the forced execution of arbitral awards against public persons of the OHADA. However, like the latter, immunity from execution also has a contractual basis ; it is a rule of public order of protection which the beneficiary can waive. Therefore, its application would only be required if its beneficiary has not waived it. However, to be valid, the waiver of immunity from execution must be express, within the meaning of customary international law, of which the United Nations Convention on Jurisdictional Immunity of States and their Property of December 2, 2004 forms part. applicable in OHADA law, for legal reasons. This condition of validity of the waiver poses the problem of the effectiveness of contracts subject to the mandatory rules of public law or arbitration agreements and regulations. So, should we consider rewriting the usual models of arbitration agreements and rules to include this condition ? This approach would guarantee the effectiveness of administrative arbitration awards, based on the binding force of contracts (pacta sunt servenda) and their performance in good faith. Also, this waiver could be reinforced by the mention of property assigned to the activity in question or to the execution of the award which will ensue unrelated to the activity which gave rise to it. In any event, immunity from execution does not preclude either the identification of the debtors of the pecuniary judgments of public persons, nor the exequatur of administrative arbitration awards, nor even the voluntary or spontaneous execution of the said sentences. T hus, despite its absolute or strict design, OHADA immunity from execution has limits with respect to administrative arbitral awards
Ramírez, Reyes Santiago. „L’affinement des mécanismes liés à l’ordre public dans le choix de la loi applicable aux contrats internationaux : regards franco-mexicain“. Thesis, Paris 1, 2019. http://www.theses.fr/2019PA01D088.
The concepts of public policy and overriding mandatory rules are to be found within the vocabulary of the general theory of conflict of laws. It is legitimate to ask whether this statement of principle can be illustrated by a French-Mexican comparison. The relevance of such a comparison may seem doubtful, given France's participation in a more or less unifying process, due to its membership of the European Union; whereas Mexico, on the other hand, is organized around a "federal pact". However, the comparison remains relevant as we can observe that the relationship between the nation-state and private international law inexorably passes through the prism of sovereignty and that France and Mexico remain masters of their sovereignty at the international level. This analysis is made possible thanks to the existence of a common historical background and a common legal culture, contractual matters are specifically targeted due to their high level of sensitivity to the influence of public policy. However, private international law has evolved since the identification and construction of the broad categories of the public policy and overriding mandatory rules, which have led to a number of developments whose orientation will have to be verified. These specification elements as multiple as they are varied, such as fundamental rights, protection of the weaker party, constitutional review and proportionality, among others, renders this study an opportunity to highlight the evolving nature of mechanisms related to public policy in international private contract law
Moberger, Elin. „Free Movement of Goods : Article 36 TFEU and Mandatory Requirements Justification under Public Policy and Public Security“. Thesis, Örebro universitet, Institutionen för juridik, psykologi och socialt arbete, 2019. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-76477.
Smith, Barbara H. „Mandatory Internet filtering in public libraries the disconnect between law and technology /“. [Gainesville, Fla.] : University of Florida, 2009. http://purl.fcla.edu/fcla/etd/UFE0021600.
Bücher zum Thema "Mandatory rules of public law":
Huffman, Robert K., und Frederic M. Levy. Guide to the mandatory disclosure rule: Issues, guidelines, and best practices : report of the Task Force on Implementation of the Contractor Code of Business Ethics and Conduct and Mandatory Disclosure Rule. [Chicago, Ill.]: American Bar Association, Section of Public Contract Law, 2010.
Israel. Mandatory tenders: Verbatim English translations of the ... 4. Aufl. [Haifa]: A.G. Publications, 1998.
Maine. Maine notary public law and rules. [Augusta, Me.]: Bill Diamond, Secretary of State, 1995.
Commission, Texas Public Utility. Substantive rules. Austin, Tex. (7800 Shoal Creek Blvd., Suite 450N, Austin 78757): Public Utility Commission of Texas, 1986.
Kansas. Kansas public warehouse law: Rules and regulations. Topeka, KS (P.O. Box 1918, Topeka 66603): Kansas State Grain Inspection Dept., Warehouse Division, 1990.
Kansas. Kansas public warehouse law: Rules and regulations. Topeka, KS (P.O. Box 1918, Topeka 66603): Kansas State Grain Inspection Dept., Warehouse Division, 1987.
Louisiana. Insurance Dept. Regulations, directives, and rules of practice and procedure (new rules) and Public Safety Department rules. Chatsworth, Calif: National Insurance Law Service, 1985.
Dakota, North. Laws and rules governing public utilities. Bismarck, N.D: The Commission, 1994.
Finance, Grenada Ministry of. Financial rules for the public service. St. George's, Grenada: G.P.O., 1989.
Project, Ontario Ministry of the Attorney General Evaluation Committee for the Mandatory Mediation Pilot. Evaluation of the Ontario Mandatory Mediation Program (Rule 24.1): Executive summary and recommendations : submitted to Civil Rules Committee, Evaluation Committee for the Mandatory Mediation Pilot Project. [Toronto: Ministry of the Attorney General], 2001.
Buchteile zum Thema "Mandatory rules of public law":
Zarra, Giovanni. „Testing the Distinction Between Public Policy and Overriding Mandatory Rules“. In Imperativeness in Private International Law, 55–107. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-499-0_2.
Zavadilová, Lucie. „United in Diversity – Regional Unification of the Conflict-of-law Rules in Matters of Matrimonial Property Regimes“. In Universal, Regional, National – Ways of the Development of Private International Law in 21st Century, 160–78. Brno: Masaryk University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/cz.muni.p210-9497-2019-8.
Bertoli, Paolo. „The ECJ’s Rule of Reason and Internationally Mandatory Rules“. In International Courts and the Development of International Law, 771–80. The Hague, The Netherlands: T. M. C. Asser Press, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-90-6704-894-1_56.
Lewisch, Peter. „Privately Versus Publicly Enforced Rules“. In Punishment, Public Law Enforcement, and the Protective State, 64–148. Vienna: Springer Vienna, 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-9392-1_3.
Bhatti, Madhu. „Rules of State Responsibility: A South Asian Perspective“. In Shifting Horizons of Public International Law, 269–88. New Delhi: Springer India, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-81-322-3724-2_12.
Oellers-Frahm, Karin, und Andreas Zimmermann. „ILC Model Rules on Arbitral Procedure of June 27,1958“. In Dispute Settlement in Public International Law, 105–16. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-56626-4_4.
Smith, Rhona, Eimear Spain und Richard Glancey. „Civil Procedure Rules 1998, Part 54“. In Core Statutes on Public Law & Civil Liberties, 346–50. London: Macmillan Education UK, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-137-54504-6_61.
Louise, Merrett. „7 Mandatory Rules in Employment Cases“. In Employment Contracts and Private International Law. Oxford University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198860327.003.0007.
Cai, Xin. „Public Order, Mandatory Rules and Evasion of Law“. In Chinese Private International Law. Hart Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781509924400.ch-010.
„Public policy and mandatory rules of law: definition, distinction, and function“. In Overriding Mandatory Rules in International Commercial Arbitration, 9–33. Edward Elgar Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.4337/9781788973854.00009.
Konferenzberichte zum Thema "Mandatory rules of public law":
Koevski, Goran, Borka Tushevska Gavrilovikj und Darko Spasevski. „MANDATORY RULES OF THE LAW ON CONCESSIONS AND PUBLIC PRIVATE PARTNERSHIP AND THE PRINCIPLE OF FREEDOM OF CONTRACTING“. In "Social Changes in the Global World". Универзитет „Гоце Делчев“ - Штип, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.46763/scgw211187k.
„PUBLIC PROCUREMENT DISCUSSION: MANDATORY CASES AND EXCEPTIONS TO THE RULES“. In Russian science: actual researches and developments. Samara State University of Economics, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.46554/russian.science-2020.03-2-778/781.
Kimura, Kazuhiro, Seiichi Hamada und Masaaki Fujita. „Outline of the JSME Mandatory Rules for Thermal Power Generation Facilities as the Harmonized Code in the Regulatory Requirements“. In ASME 2010 Pressure Vessels and Piping Division/K-PVP Conference. ASMEDC, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/pvp2010-25119.
Fournier, Knut. „Competition Policy in Asia: The Role of Economics in the Enforcement of Competition Rules“. In 2nd Annual International Conference on Law, Regulations and Public Policy (LRPP 2013). Global Science and Technology Forum Pte Ltd, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.5176/2251-3809_lrpp13.62.
Topaloğlu, Mustafa. „Effects of Public Policy on Arbitration“. In International Conference on Eurasian Economies. Eurasian Economists Association, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.36880/c04.00805.
Đorđević, Slavko. „Merodavno pravo za ugovor o distribuciji u međunarodnom privatnom pravu Srbije“. In XVI Majsko savetovanje. University of Kragujevac, Faculty of Law, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.46793/upk20.075dj.
Kayıhan, Şaban, und Mehmet Eski. „International Economy Law Concept and the Source of International Economy Law“. In International Conference on Eurasian Economies. Eurasian Economists Association, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.36880/c06.01366.
Pejaković-Đipić, Silvija, und Željko Karas. „TWO-WITNESS RULE DURING HOME SEARCH IN THE LIGHT OF THE COVID PANDEMIC“. In The recovery of the EU and strengthening the ability to respond to new challenges – legal and economic aspects. Faculty of Law, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.25234/eclic/22432.
Mateeva, Zhivka. „NATURE OF THE CONTROL OVER THE PROTECTION OF CLASSIFIED INFORMATION, CARRIED OUT BY THE STATE COMMISSION OF INFORMATION SECURITY“. In THE LAW AND THE BUSINESS IN THE CONTEMPORARY SOCIETY 2020. University publishing house "Science and Economics", University of Economics - Varna, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.36997/lbcs2020.263.
Avcı, Mustafa. „Treatise about Confiscation without Expropriation According to Turkish Law“. In International Conference on Eurasian Economies. Eurasian Economists Association, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.36880/c05.01144.
Berichte der Organisationen zum Thema "Mandatory rules of public law":
Lewis, Dustin, und Naz Modirzadeh. Taking into Account the Potential Effects of Counterterrorism Measures on Humanitarian and Medical Activities: Elements of an Analytical Framework for States Grounded in Respect for International Law. Harvard Law School Program on International Law and Armed Conflict, Mai 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.54813/qbot8406.
Foster, Jessica. Survey of Legal Mechanisms Relating to Groundwater Along the Texas-Mexico Border. Herausgegeben von Gabriel Eckstein. Texas A&M University School of Law Program in Natural Resources Systems, April 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.37419/eenrs.groundwateralongborder.
Colomb, Claire, und Tatiana Moreira de Souza. Regulating Short-Term Rentals: Platform-based property rentals in European cities: the policy debates. Property Research Trust, Mai 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.52915/kkkd3578.