Um die anderen Arten von Veröffentlichungen zu diesem Thema anzuzeigen, folgen Sie diesem Link: Montessori pedagogika.
Zeitschriftenartikel zum Thema „Montessori pedagogika“
Geben Sie eine Quelle nach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard und anderen Zitierweisen an
Machen Sie sich mit Top-50 Zeitschriftenartikel für die Forschung zum Thema "Montessori pedagogika" bekannt.
Neben jedem Werk im Literaturverzeichnis ist die Option "Zur Bibliographie hinzufügen" verfügbar. Nutzen Sie sie, wird Ihre bibliographische Angabe des gewählten Werkes nach der nötigen Zitierweise (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver usw.) automatisch gestaltet.
Sie können auch den vollen Text der wissenschaftlichen Publikation im PDF-Format herunterladen und eine Online-Annotation der Arbeit lesen, wenn die relevanten Parameter in den Metadaten verfügbar sind.
Sehen Sie die Zeitschriftenartikel für verschiedene Spezialgebieten durch und erstellen Sie Ihre Bibliographie auf korrekte Weise.
1
Wójcik, Anna. „Pedagogika Montessori – ciągle aktualne wyzwanie dla współczesnej pedagogiki“. Edukacja – Technika – Informatyka 23, Nr. 1 (2018): 264–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.15584/eti.2018.1.35.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
2
Zoszak-Łoskot, Karolina. „Miłość w perspektywie dzieci ze szkół pracujących w oparciu o pedagogikę M. Montessori i system tradycyjny“. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, sectio J – Paedagogia-Psychologia 31, Nr. 4 (26.04.2019): 275. http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/j.2018.31.4.275-291.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
<p>W artykule opisano wyniki badań dotyczących rozumienia pojęcia „miłość” przez dzieci uczęszczające do szkół pracujących w oparciu o system tradycyjny oraz alternatywny – M. Montessori. Badania zostały przeprowadzone w 2018 r. w grupie 80 dzieci w wieku 6–9 lat. Wyniki zostały zebrane na podstawie analizy wytworu plastycznego, przedstawiającego wyobrażenie miłości (rysunek wykonany dowolną techniką), oraz wypowiadanych przez dziecko skojarzeń ze słowem <em>miłość</em>. Na podstawie przeprowadzonych analiz zauważono większą różnorodność interpretowania miłości wśród dzieci uczących się w oparciu o system alternatywny, jakim jest pedagogika Montessori.</p>
3
Sosnowska, Joanna. „The Reception of Maria Montessori’s Pedagogical Theory in Pre-School Education in Interwar Poland“. Nauki o Wychowaniu. Studia Interdyscyplinarne 11, Nr. 2 (06.11.2020): 106–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.18778/2450-4491.11.09.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
The innovative tendency in pedagogy, called “new education”, which appeared in many European countries in the first half of the 20th century, aimed at reviving schooling, the conditions of education, and the process of learning; it also set a new role for the teacher and emphasized a new approach to the child. Maria Montessori (1870–1952), an Italian physician and educationalist, was one of the representatives of “new education”. Knowledge of the pedagogical theory developed by Montessori was spread in Poland through her books and the pedagogical-psychological literature of Polish educationalists, which referred to the Montessori educational concept. The purpose of this work is to present the reception of Montessori’s pedagogical theory in pre-school education in 1918–1939.
4
Hryhorieva, Natalia. „M. MONTESSORI’S IDEAS ABOUT THE ROLE AND FUNCTIONS OF THE TEACHER OF PRESCHOOL EDUCATION INSTITUTION AND THEIR USE IN THE CONDITIONS OF REFORMING THE DOMESTIC PRESCHOOL EDUCATION“. Psychological and Pedagogical Problems of Modern School, Nr. 1(5) (27.05.2021): 79–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.31499/2706-6258.1(5).2021.235188.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Today, the unconditional value and uniqueness of Montessori’s ideas is recognized. Preschool teachers are recommended to build the educational process focusing on humanistic philosophy and pedagogy. That is why it becomes important to study and comprehend the potential of pedagogical systems and methods of personality-oriented nature, which have taken leading positions in the world educational space and proved their importance and effectiveness. One of the brightest representatives of humanistic pedagogy is the Italian pedagogue, psychologist, author of the pedagogical system that bears her name ‒ M. Montessori. The article mentions the names of teachers who studied the pedagogical heritage of the Italian teacher. The article considers the requirements of personal and professional nature to the modern educator in the context of reforming preschool education in Ukraine. On the basis of the theoretical analysis the basic pedagogical ideas of the outstanding Italian pedagogue-humanist M. Montessori concerning the role and functions of the teacher in educational process are revealed. The relevance of their application to the professional development of a teacher in a traditional preschool institution is substantiated. The author noticed the main functions of the Montessori teacher,which were first specified by M. Sorokova in the textbook for students “M. Montessori system: theory and practice”. It is determined that further research is needed to create a structured program of professional and personal self-development of the teacher, which will help to adapt freely to non-standard situations of life in general and professional activity in particular.
Keywords: child, M. Montessori pedagogical system, Montessori teacher, personality-oriented concept, humanism, preschool age, preschool education, functions of the teacher.
5
Faria, Fernanda Luiza, und Ivoni Freitas-Reis. „Um estudo sobre escolas com pedagogias diferenciadas: a pedagogia Waldorf, a pedagogia Montessori e a escola da ponte em foco“. INTERFACES DA EDUCAÇÃO 8, Nr. 23 (20.09.2017): 160–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.26514/inter.v8i23.2009.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
O presente estudo discorre sobre três pedagogias que apresentam projetos de ensino diferentes ao padrão escolar: Pedagogia Waldorf, Pedagogia Montessori e o projeto Fazer a Ponte. Alicerçados no referencial teórico da pedagogia diferenciada e concomitantemente, com uma educação que promova uma cultura científica básica a seus estudantes, este estudo de caráter teórico se faz sob o contexto do ensino de química estabelecido nestas instituições. Como base para essa abordagem tem-se uma pesquisa documental em sites de escolas que seguem as pedagogias investigadas, livros e artigos que discutem sobre as mesmas, bem como observação de três escolas - uma que segue a Pedagogia Waldorf, uma que segue a Pedagogia Montessori, ambas no Brasil, e ainda a observação na Escola da Ponte, localizada em Portugal. Este trabalho tornou-se significativo, na medida que trouxe discussões sobre temáticas ainda pouco familiares ao contexto das pesquisas educacionais e do próprio cotidiano dos professores em geral. Ademais abordou inspirações e discussões que possibilitaram uma reflexão acerca do ensino que se constitui atualmente nas escolas e como algumas mudanças de ideais, organizacionais e comportamentais podem modificar um espaço escolar.
6
Kepeš, Nusreta. „PEDAGOŠKA IDEJA MARIE MONTESSORI“. Zbornik radova Islamskog pedagoškog fakulteta u Bihaću 8, Nr. 8 (21.12.2016): 173–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.52535/27441695.2016.8.173-186.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Maria Montessori je jedna od najpoznatijih žena u istoriji pedagogije. Ona je bila prva žena koja je diplomirala medicinu na Univerzitetu u Rimu i koja se kao ljekar zainteresovala za obrazovanje djece s posebnim potrebama. Osim toga, njene obrazovne metode kao lječnice, pedagoginje i innovatorice su priznate jer se oslanjaju na prirodan način učenja. Montesori metod obrazovanja, razvijen od strane Dr. Marie Montessori, je metod usmjeren na dijete čiji je rad zasnovan na znanstvenim zapažanjima ponašanja djece od rođenja do odrasle dobi. Njena pedagogija izazvala je interes širom svijeta i sa više od 100 godina uspjeha primjenjuje se u različitim kulturama. Metoda Montessori se uglavnom bazira na ideji da djeca najbolje uče kada okruženje podržava prirodnu želju djeteta da stekne vještine i znanja. Umjesto da se fokusira na akademsko obrazovanje, Montessori metoda se fokusira na poštovanje i podsticanje individualne razlike svakog djeteta, njegujući okruženje koje potiče socijalne interakcije i emocionalnu sposobnost djece. Njena filozofija i tehnike poučavanja se izučavaju na univerzitetima i primjenjuju u vrtićima i školama širom svijeta.
7
Сумнительный, К., und K. Sumnitel'nyy. „What Does M. Montessori Offer for Modern Education?“ Profession-Oriented School 7, Nr. 4 (24.09.2019): 44–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.12737/article_5d678bd7d21021.78152978.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
The article discusses the features of the pedagogical system of M. Montessori. The importance of its system for the development of modern education is revealed. Attention is paid to the bias of the concept of M. Montessori that has developed in Russian pedagogy and the risks of its development within the framework of the national pedagogical and sociocultural context. The main problems associated with the use of the Montessori method in the domestic pedagogical space are analyzed. The features of the methodological and didactic support of the pedagogical process in the Montessori classes for diff erent age groups are considered. The pedagogical and psychological sense of the teacher’s activity in the Montessori classroom is revealed. The problem of training teachers for M. Montessori classes and the possible reactions of students to the shock of the proposed change in professional stereotypes are discussed.
8
Oliveira, Dayane dos Santos, Dulce Rafaela Gomes Martins, Cristiane Costa de Oliveira, Cristiane Rodrigues da Silva, Rosângela Rodrigues da Silva und José Eduardo Silva. „O Método Montessori na educação básica: Uma revisão sistemática da literatura sobre sua influência para o desenvolvimento da criança nos anos iniciais“. Research, Society and Development 10, Nr. 5 (14.05.2021): e48010515300. http://dx.doi.org/10.33448/rsd-v10i5.15300.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Objetivou-se apresentar reflexões acerca das contribuições do Método de Maria Montessori em um contexto atual, considerando o desenvolvimento da autonomia da criança nos anos iniciais da Educação Básica. Quanto ao método, realizou-se uma pesquisa do tipo revisão bibliográfica levando em conta as contribuições de diversos autores, observando as características da Padagogia de Montessori e suas reflexões metodológicas e didáticas no desenvolvimento da autonomia da criança na educação básica e sua atuação no Brasil, sucedendo com abordagem teórica e metodológica da Pedagogia Tradiconal e da Pedagogia de Waldorf para subsidiar a análise reflexiva do modelo montessoriano. Com os resultados, percebeu-se que a Pedagogia de Montessori se faz presente em 62 unidades educacionais distribuídas em todas as regiões brasileiras, podendo ser compreendida como uma alternativa pedagógica alinhada aos princípios reguladores da BNCC e PCN, e constatou-se a falta de estudos que apontem o desenvolvimento da Pedagogia de Montessori em escolas públicas que prestam serviços à Educação Infantil e Ensino Fundamental. Pode-se concluir que a Pedagogia de Montessori vem contribuindo de forma significativa para a aprendizagem da criança em seu desenvolvimento educacional com autonomia e liberdade, e através das abordagens lúdicas e aplicação do modelo em ciclos por faixa etária estimula a construção do conhecimento e melhor interação no ambiente educacional.
9
Fernandes, Hercília Maria, und Marta Maria de Araújo. „Pedagogia científica à descoberta da criança“. Revista Educação em Questão 50, Nr. 36 (15.12.2014): 248–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.21680/1981-1802.2014v50n36id7087.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
10
Kolasa-Skiba, Agata. „Edukacja muzyczna dzieci w przedszkolu Marii Montessori“. Edukacja • Terapia • Opieka 1 (31.12.2019): 31–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.52934/eto.58.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Istota pedagogiki Marii Montessori sprowadza się do stwierdzenia, że każde dziecko jest inne, powinno rozwijać się według swoich możliwości, kompetencji i umiejętności – indywidualnych planów rozwojowych tak, aby ich właściwa realizacja umożliwiała mu naukę samodzielną i efektywniejszą. Dziecko wychowane w duchu pedagogiki Marii Montessori będzie w przyszłości osobą samodzielną, odpowiedzialną za siebie i świat, pracowitą. Rozwój każdego dziecka dokonuje się według indywidualnego „planu rozwoju”. Dlatego nie można z góry stworzyć systemu wychowawczego i dydaktycznego bez uwzględnienia indywidualnych cech dziecka. Wychowaniu muzycznemu Maria Montessori poświęciła wiele uwagi. Ważne jest łączenie muzyki z ruchem, który jest ważnym czynnikiem rozwoju dziecka.
11
Modekin, Alexander A. „Three foundations of self-organization or Montessori in the postnonclassical age“. Problems of Modern Education (Problemy Sovremennogo Obrazovaniya), Nr. 2, 2020 (2020): 93–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.31862/2218-8711-2020-2-93-102.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
The article is devoted to the study of self-organization in the Montessori Elementary school. The topic of self-organization was previously discussed within different areas of science by P. Kropotkin, H. Haken, E. Sheval and others. M. Montessori described conditions required for the big groups of children to study independently and productively. These conditions can be discussed through the lens of the modern science. The article contains three groups of the self-organization foundations in the Elementary school: philosophical, psychological and pedagogical. The philosophical foundations are the elements of the self-organizing system, which are the following: an open system, a big amount of the elements and the energy coming to the system from the outside. Psychological foundations are the executive functions development, self-determination and flow. Pedagogical foundations of the self-organization are the key elements of the Montessori Method: a prepared environment, observation by the teacher and mixed age classroom. The theoretical analysis shows that a Montessori Elementary school creates all conditions for self-organized system in any classroom.
12
Jendza, Jarosław. „The power of authority and the Montessori teachers’ (in)ability to learn – research intervention report“. Problemy Wczesnej Edukacji 48, Nr. 1 (31.03.2020): 100–109. http://dx.doi.org/10.26881/pwe.2020.48.09.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
The article concentrates on the issue of Montessori teachers’ attitude towards pedagogical knowledge they develop during different forms of training. The analysis presented in the text is based on quasi-experiment rooted in Critical Realism research paradigm. Eighty-two Montessori teachers participated in a workshop and were asked to comment on eight different quotes. Half of them knew that these extracts had been taken from the publications by Maria Montessori and the other half did not have that knowledge. As a result, the first group of teachers formulated numerous critical remarks whereas the other one concentrated on positive interpretations. This experiment might shed some light on the power of authority and limitations to transform teachers’ implicit pedagogical presuppositions. The teachers that took part in this experiment were provided with the opportunity to problematize their personal teaching theories.
13
Paschoal, Jaqueline Delgado, und Maria Cristina Gomes Machado. „A pedagogia de Maria Montessori para a educação na infância“. Quaestio - Revista de Estudos em Educação 21, Nr. 1 (30.04.2019): 203–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.22483/2177-5796.2019v21n1p203-220.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Maria Montessori reconheceu a infância como um período fértil no qual as potencialidades se desenvolvem rapidamente, e ressaltou a livre expressão e um ambiente adequado e motivador como fatores fundamentais para despertar a inteligência das crianças, de modo a prepará-las para a vida adulta. Ao considerar que a criança é um pequeno explorador do mundo ao seu redor, defendeu a liberdade de ação nessa interação, para a qual propôs a educação dos sentidos como elemento importante no trabalho do professor. O tripé atividade-individualidade-liberdade formava a base de seu trabalho e os estímulos externos eram considerados como determinantes para o desenvolvimento infantil. O propósito desse estudo de caráter bibliográfico é apresentar a concepção de Montessori sobre a infância e o trabalho pedagógico com crianças em espaços coletivos. O intuito é contribuir para a formação continuada de professores da infância no sentido de destacar a atualidade da proposta montessoriana no contexto escolar.
14
Plekhanov, A. „The Pedagogical Theory and Practice of Maria Montessori“. Russian Social Science Review 33, Nr. 4 (Juli 1992): 79–92. http://dx.doi.org/10.2753/rss1061-1428330479.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
15
Plekhanov, A. „The Pedagogical Theory and Practice of Maria Montessori“. Russian Education & Society 34, Nr. 3 (März 1992): 83–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.2753/res1060-9393340383.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
16
Namukasa, Immaculate Kizito, und Kinful Lartebea Aryee. „Pedagogical Knowledge for Teaching Mathematics in Montessori Schools“. International Electronic Journal of Mathematics Education 16, Nr. 3 (23.06.2021): em0646. http://dx.doi.org/10.29333/iejme/11005.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
17
Ballmann de Campos, Simone. „O viés americano do método Montessori em São Paulo: Ciridião Buarque e Mary Buarque“. Revista Inter Ação 43, Nr. 3 (14.03.2019): 864–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.5216/ia.v43i3.50764.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Montessori constituiu, em 1907, em Roma, uma escola pública para crianças em situação de risco, a Casa dei Bambini, que difundida transnacionalmente configurou práticas e pensamento educacional inovadores. O objeto desta narrativa historiográfica foi estudar a institucionalização do Método Montessori no Brasil, problematizando a sua forma de apropriação e identificando por que o método é relacionado principalmente ao uso de materiais didáticos específicos e de mobiliário adequado ao tamanho das crianças. Foi constatado que a primeira escola montessoriana no Brasil atendeu ao público infantil, em São Paulo, no ano de 1915, num investimento particular de Ciridião Buarque e Mary Buarque. Esta pedagogia se irradiou por intermédio das apropriações realizadas pelos docentes da Escola Normal da Praça, e da legislação que indicava o uso de materiais didáticos de Montessori e de Froebel, mas de forma desarticulada de tais princípios pedagógicos. Evidências da utilização do Método Montessori em perspectiva não restrita ao uso de materiais didáticos foram encontradas nos programas infantis radiofônicos.
18
Slovacek, Matej, und Monika Minova. „Training of undergraduate preschool teachers in Montessori education in Slovakia and the Czech Republic“. Research in Pedagogy 11, Nr. 1 (2021): 137–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.5937/istrped2101137s.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
The paper presents a description and comparison of the undergraduate student teacher training and kindergarten teacher continuing education in the Montessori Method of Education encompassed in formal education in Slovakia and the Czech Republic. The theoretical part of the paper aims at depicting Montessori education, still an attractive pedagogical direction in both countries, in a thorough, unconventional and innovative way. Even though Montessori education has been rooted worldwide for centuries, in Slovakia and the Czech Republic it presents relatively new alternative education, considering that an integrated school system, introduced in these countries in 1948 and lasting almost to the end of20thcentury, did not allow the use of other alternatives in addition to the mainstream education. A description of (preschool) education in both countries and an analysis of kindergarten teacher's personality and his/her lesson plans are included in the theoretical part of the paper. The empirical part contains pedagogical research of qualitative design, conducted in Slovakia and the Czech Republic in order to identify and map the current state, level and possibilities of formal education of pre-service and in-service teachers in Slovak and Czech kindergartens.
19
Chytrý, Vlastimil, Janka Medová, Jaroslav Říčan und Jiří Škoda. „Relation between Pupils’ Mathematical Self-Efficacy and Mathematical Problem Solving in the Context of the Teachers’ Preferred Pedagogies“. Sustainability 12, Nr. 23 (07.12.2020): 10215. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su122310215.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
In research focused on self-efficacy it is usually teacher-related phenomena that are studied, while the main aspects related to pupils are rather neglected, although self-efficacy itself is perceived as a belief in one’s own abilities. Evidently, this strongly influences the behavior of individuals in terms of the goal and success in mathematical problem-solving. Considering that alternative teaching methods are based on the principle of belief in one’s own ability (mainly in the case of group work), higher self-efficacy can be expected in the pupils of teachers who use predominantly the well-working pupil-centered pedagogies. A total of 1133 pupils in grade 5 from 36 schools in the Czech Republic were involved in the testing of their ability to solve mathematical problems and their mathematical self-efficacy as well. Participants were divided according to the above criteria as follows: (i) 73 from Montessori primary schools, (ii) 332 pupils educated in mathematics according to the Hejný method, (iii) 510 pupils from an ordinary primary school, and (iv) 218 pupils completing the Dalton teaching plan. In the field of mathematical problem-solving the pupils from the Montessori primary schools clearly outperformed pupils from the Dalton Plan schools (p = 0.027) as well as pupils attending ordinary primary schools (p = 0.009), whereas the difference between the Montessori schools and Hejný classes was not significant (p = 0.764). There is no statistically significant difference in the level of self-efficacy of pupils with respect to the preferred strategies for managing learning activities (p = 0.781). On the other hand, correlation between mathematical problem-solving and self-efficacy was confirmed in all the examined types of schools. However, the correlation coefficient was lower in the case of the pupils from the classes applying the Hejný method in comparison with the pupils attending the Montessori schools (p = 0.073), Dalton Plan schools (p = 0.043), and ordinary primary schools (p = 0.002). Even though the results in mathematical problem-solving are not consistent across the studies, the presented results confirm better performance of pupils in some constructivist settings, particularly in the case of individual constructivism in the Montessori primary schools. The factors influencing lower correlation of self-efficacy and performance in mathematical problem-solving ought to be subject to further investigation.
20
De Oliveira Silva, Jocenir, Idilia Fernandes und Luísa Righi Fonseca. „Políticas para pessoa com deficiência e as contribuições de Freire e Montessori“. Textos & Contextos (Porto Alegre) 19, Nr. 1 (26.05.2020): e36611. http://dx.doi.org/10.15448/1677-9509.2020.1.36611.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
A temática central deste artigo versa sobre o atendimento das Pessoas com Deficiência, busca-se deste modo inferir sobre algumas contribuições históricas a partir da pedagogia proposta por Paulo Freire e Maria Montessori. Apesar de em estudos preliminares Freire não ter tratado diretamente sobre o tema pessoa com deficiência, traz em suas obras um vasto material que dividiu barreiras entre a educação para poucos e a sua democratização. Freire (2013, p. 47) defende que a Educação é um processo em que o sujeito deve apreender através da sua vivência, não se evolui recebendo conhecimentos prontos, ou seja: “ensinar não é transferir conhecimentos, mas criar as possibilidades para a sua própria produção ou a sua construção”. Deste modo, permite-se estabelecer uma relação entre a pedagogia de Paulo Freire e a política educacional para as pessoas com deficiência, pois ambas desejam que todas as pessoas da sociedade tenham acesso à política de educação. Já a pedagogia proposta por Maria Montessori está inter-relacionada com a inclusão das pessoas com deficiência, uma vez que seus estudos inicialmente voltaram-se para a educação de crianças com deficiência intelectual.
21
Jendza, Jarosław, und Agata Rzeplińska. „Od pedagogiki krytycznej ku postkrytycznej pedagogii (z metodą Montessori w tle)“. Ars Educandi, Nr. 9 (08.12.2012): 272–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.26881/ae.2012.09.17.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Autorzy artykułu orientują się wobec praktyk nauczycielskich w kontekście pedagogiki krytycznej, rozumienia uczniów oraz wspólnego kontruowania edukacji - także w kontekście problemów na tym polu, zmian społecznych i demaskacji.
22
Сафаралиева, О., und O. Safaralieva. „About the Program Vocational-Personal Self-Development Teacher Montessri“. Scientific Research and Development. Socio-Humanitarian Research and Technology 6, Nr. 4 (18.12.2017): 40–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.12737/article_5a2e6c4ca17ab6.28360403.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Humanization of the modern national education inevitably entailed changes to the requirements for the individual nature of the competence of professionals working with the child. From the teacher it is required to create a very special environment, in collaboration with the child. It increases the relevance of the professional transformation of the modern teacher and changes in their professional training. Practice shows that many established professionals pedagogical ideas of Montessori discovers the true foundations of the humanistic paradigm of education. Training of Specialists in Montessori system allows them not only to obtain new skills, but also the personality and self-modifying self-development. The course of professional and personal self-development Montessori teacher turns from simple to complex, from cognition to interpersonal and internal communication. In this sequence, each stage of the program appears as an element of the whole process of personal development.
23
Silva, M. P., und A. F. S. Guerra. „Um Movimento em Direção aos Espaços Educadores Sustentáveis na Pedagogia Montessori“. Comunicações 22, Nr. 2e (30.12.2015): 391–413. http://dx.doi.org/10.15600/2238-121x/comunicacoes.v22n2ep391-413.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
24
Zwierzchowska, Iwona. „(Nie)świadoma decyzja, czyli o motywach wyboru przedszkola Montessori“. Lubelski Rocznik Pedagogiczny 37, Nr. 1 (06.11.2018): 75. http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/lrp.2018.37.1.75-94.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
<p>Dynamiczne zmiany zachodzące we współczesnej rzeczywistości społecznej stawiają nowe wyzwania przed polskim szkolnictwem. Konieczność odejścia od głęboko zakorzenionej tradycji edukacyjnej i niedostosowanego do obecnych warunków modelu szkoły skłania do poszukiwania alternatywnych rozwiązań. W związku z tym od kilkunastu lat obserwuje się wzrost zainteresowania różnorodnymi ofertami edukacyjnymi, wśród których ważne miejsce zajmuje kształcenie zgodne z założeniami koncepcji pedagogicznej Marii Montessori.</p><p>Oparcie realizowanego w placówkach montessoriańskich procesu edukacyjnego na aktywności dziecka, podmiotowe traktowanie wychowanka, respektowanie jego indywidualnych potrzeb, możliwości i zainteresowań, wspieranie jego wszechstronnego rozwoju staje się katalizatorem samorozwoju, samokształcenia i samowychowania, których tak bardzo oczekuje się od współczesnego pokolenia uczniów. Rosnąca popularność placówek montessoriańskich skłania jednak do postawienia pytania, na ile ich wybór jest efektem racjonalnej decyzji rodziców i faktycznego przekonania o wartości systemu pedagogicznego Montessori. Analiza materiału empirycznego zgromadzonego na potrzeby niniejszego opracowania ujawniła motywy, jakimi kierowali się badani rodzice, dokonując wyboru placówki przedszkolnej dla swojego dziecka, a także ich oczekiwania i opinie na temat edukacji realizowanej w przedszkolach wykorzystujących pedagogikę Marii Montessori.</p>
25
Tregenza, Virginia Anne. „Looking back to the future: The current relevance of Maria Montessori’s ideas about the spiritual well-being of young children“. Journal of Student Wellbeing 2, Nr. 2 (27.03.2009): 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.21913/jsw.v2i2.392.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Maria Montessori (1870-1952) was an Italian educator whose ideas and principles have validity in informing, understanding and responding to the challenges faced by contemporary educators . Many of her foundational principles are at the forefront of current educational thinking but are unacknowledged or unknown in mainstream education. It is argued that her ideas and principles about the spiritual wellbeing of young children have validity in the current debate. Montessori saw spirituality as innate in young children, the primary force driving their development and central to their capacity for joyful and deep engagement with their environment. She saw children’s capacity and ability to concentrate deeply as a spiritual pathway to a new level of individual consciousness and connection to the environment. These principles can inform our current thinking, understanding and response to young children’s spirituality. The conditions to bring about, support and protect what Montessori calls ‘concentration’ should be considered in pedagogical responses to the spiritual needs of young children
26
Dudnyk, Nadiya, und Oleksandra Sviontyk. „THE USE OF PEDAGOGICAL SYSTEM OF MARIA MONTESSORI IN UKRAINIAN EDUCATION“. Human Studies. Series of "Pedagogy", Nr. 9/41 (05.09.2019): 88–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.24919/2413-2039.9/41.175703.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
27
Seveso, Gabriella. „Non solo seggioline e tavolini: il valore sociale della proposta di Maria Montessori“. Educação (UFSM) 43, Nr. 4 (01.10.2018): 641. http://dx.doi.org/10.5902/1984644434579.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Il contributo ha un taglio storico con attenzione all’attualità e si occupa della pedagogia montessoriana, che è recentemente al centro di un dibattito vivace in Italia e di nuove sperimentazioni. Esso vuole mostrare il notevole valore etico e sociale presente nella proposta di Maria Montessori: un valore che attualmente è un po’ trascurato a livello divulgativo, perché la concezione montessoriana viene ridotta in alcuni casi a un metodo didattico (arredi a misura di bambino, materiali scientifici, maestra unica). Per questo motivo, l’autrice del contributo analizza il Discorso inaugurale in occasione dell’apertura di una Casa dei bambini nel 1907, scritto e pronunciato da Maria Montessori, focalizzandosi su alcuni temi. Il primo tema è quello degli spazi: il Discorso mette in luce come Montessori pensava al valore simbolico e sociale delle Case dei bambini e alla loro importanza per il recupero di situazioni di degrado e di miseria. Il secondo tema è quello del profilo professionale della maestra: le parole di Montessori mostrano come l’insegnante ha una importante funzione sociale ed è la persona che cresce i futuri cittadini favorendone la consapevolezza critica attraverso una relazione fondata sull’autonomia. Una rilettura dell’opera montessoriana in questa luce ci sprona anche a rivedere le proposte di altri pensatori della nostra storia culturale non come metodi didattici, pur innovativi e interessanti, ma anche e soprattutto nel loro messaggio sociale. Questa prospettiva appare sempre più urgente e doverosa in un’epoca come la nostra, che si trova ad affrontare problemi molto gravi riguardo alle condizioni dell’infanzia.
28
Levsen, Dirk. „Maria Montessori (1870–1952) – Et kritisk blikk på hennes pedagogikk og liv“. Norsk pedagogisk tidsskrift 90, Nr. 03 (28.06.2006): 243–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.18261/issn1504-2987-2006-03-06.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
29
Khopta, S. M. „PEDAGOGICAL IDEAS OF MARIA MONTESSORI IN THE CONTEXT OF MODERN EDUCATIONAL SPACE“. Innovate Pedagogy, Nr. 28 (2020): 48–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.32843/2663-6085/2020/28.8.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
30
Czarnecka, Aleksandra. „Popularization of Maria Montessori's method of education on the pages of the pedagogical journal “Education in Kindergarten” between 1989 and 2017“. Pedagogika 27, Nr. 1 (2018): 457–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.16926/p.2018.27.33.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
31
Golovko, Marharyta, und Svitlana Rakityanskaya. „Experience of Pedagogical Support of Preschool Childhood in Modern M. Montessori Schools of Ukraine“. Bulletin of Luhansk Taras Shevchenko National University 2, Nr. 1 (324) (2019): 112–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.12958/2227-2844-2019-1(324)-2-112-122.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
32
Cepeda Escobar, Angie Alejandra, Maria Angélica Arias García, Karent Yubeli Castañeda López, Diana Johana Forero Mendonza, Tatiana Geraldine Ramírez Bello, Sandra Adriana Useche und Diego Andrés Pinzón González. „Estrategias pedagógicas y didácticas desde los enfoques pedagógicos de María Montessori y Reggio Emilia para la construcción de un currículo emergente en Educación Infantil / Pedagogic and didactic strategies from the approaches María Montessori and Reggio Emilia for the construction of an emergent curriculum in childhood education“. Revista Internacional de Educación y Aprendizaje 6, Nr. 1 (05.07.2018): 35–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.37467/gka-revedu.v6.1501.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
El artículo muestra los resultados de la investigación realizada por maestras licenciadas en educación preescolar de la Fundación Universitaria Monserrate en Bogotá, Colombia. Se pretendió buscar rutas metodológicas y didácticas adecuadas en la educación infantil, con el fin de potenciar de las dimensiones del desarrollo de los infantes, con base en enfoques pedagógicos de María Montessori y Reggio Emilia, vinculando perspectivas del desarrollo infantil, la pedagogía y la didáctica pertinentes en contextos urbanos vulnerables. Se muestra una concepción de currículo emergente, proporcionando así una nueva mirada al rol de maestro y el papel del niño en la educación infantil. The article shows the results of the research carried out by teachers in pre-school education at the Fundación Universitaria Monserrate, in Bogotá, Colombia. The aim was to search for appropriate methodological and didactic routes in early childhood education, in order to enhance the developmental dimensions of infants, based on pedagogical approaches of Maria Montessori and Reggio Emilia, linking perspectives of child development, pedagogy and didactics relevant in vulnerable urban contexts. It shows a conception of emergent curriculum, thus providing a new look at the role of the teacher and the role of the child in early childhood education.
33
Lamrani, Rachid, und El Abdelwahed. „Game-based learning and gamification to improve skills in early years education“. Computer Science and Information Systems 17, Nr. 1 (2020): 339–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/csis190511043l.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Early childhood education has become a prevalent public policy issue. It has a serious impact on the child's personality, upbringing, education, socialization, development, and academic success from the preschool period to the university and beyond. In general, traditional teaching methods usually have a fixed learning structure which disables the child to be motivated, creative and innovative. Learners receive theoretical rather than practical instructions, which discourage them from keeping and recalling concepts and information more quickly. Moreover, traditional teaching usually lacks attracting the full attention of learners which decreases their interaction, engagement and investment in the content. Thus, the development of innovative approaches offering better education is an effective way to address this problem. On the other hand, recent researches in the fields of cognitive science and educational neuroscience show that play-based learning is a promising approach to use in early childhood education. Four key success factors for learning have been identified to strengthen children's skills, namely attention, active engagement, feedback, and consolidation. Thus, the proposed approach presents a digital play-based learning approach deploying serious games augmenting the pedagogical aspect of the Montessori approach. Our purpose is to improve children's skills in their early years education through play-based learning and gamification. It aims to provide children with a rich variety of serious gaming activities and challenging experiences in an interactive environment. We developed several serious games based on Montessori pedagogical principal and the four pillars of learning. For the evaluation, we have chosen a representative sample of children from rural regions.
34
Живковић, Ивица. „ХРИШЋАНСКО ВАСПИТАЊЕ И МОДЕРНА ПЕДАГОШКА МИСАО“. ГОДИШЊАК ЗА ПЕДАГОГИЈУ 2, Nr. 1 (15.12.2020): 21–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.46630/gped.2.2020.02.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Christian pedagogy is based in a specific pedagogical approach which, through all the historical periods, represents more than same possible new doctrine, new pedagogical theory or system of pedagogical comprehensions in the world. In this article we review Christian education by several most general principles, among which the most important are: the starting point of the faith in God, the specific relationship of love for child and the awareness of human sin. Furthermore we explore the opinion of some relevant researchers who claimed that the significance attributed to child in the history of pedagogical thought is related to the more profound penetration of Christian religion into the customs and perceptions of the Western world. The influence of Christianity is also apparent in the emancipatory tendencies of pedagogical classics, first of all in the attitudes of Maria Montessori, whose interpretation of Christ’s words on children may be quoted as one of the greatest challenges for the contemporary understanding about the child issue. The status of child and grown-ups in the modern world imposes certain perplexities, and Christian pedagogy can propose some material contribution to their resolution.
35
Glier, Joachim. „The Montessori's pedagogy in holistic terms“. Studia z Teorii Wychowania XI, Nr. 4(33) (31.12.2020): 137–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0014.6562.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
There are already a lot of publications on Montessori’s pedagogy, both abroad and in Poland. The authors of those scientific articles and monographs usually focused on one or more selected issues and discussed them or developed in context of their own research. The great number of those publications isn’t something negative, because it enables getting to know this pedagogical conception in depth. However this great number of studies and the variety of raised issues cause that the constitutive elements of this pedagogy blur in details of this numerous publications and also cause that the originality of this pedagogy becomes difficult to catch. This situation was the reason for attempting to define this pedagogy, that is, to define its constitutive components, to subject them to analyses and then to combine them into a holistic conception of pedagogy called Montessori’s pedagogy.
36
Nogaro, Arnaldo, Ritieli Andressa Anese und Rosane de Fátima Ferrari. „A ATUALIDADE DE MONTESSORI: EVIDÊNCIAS A PARTIR DA INVESTIGAÇÃO DAS PRÁTICAS PEDAGÓGICAS NA EDUCAÇÃO INFANTIL“. Vivências 17, Nr. 32 (14.12.2020): 113–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.31512/vivencias.v17i32.140.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
O artigo procura sistematizar as evidências coletadas, por meio de investigação empírica, com o objetivo de analisar e compreender a atualidade do pensamento de Maria Montessori – o Método montessoriano – e sua influência na organização e condução das práticas pedagógicas na Educação Infantil. A pesquisa foi realizada em uma escola, que atende a este nível de ensino, de uma cidade do Oeste do Estado de Santa Catarina, mediante observações in loco e entrevista com educadores e gestor. A análise dos dados segue a perspectiva teórica de Bardin (1977). Para abrigar os dados foram definidas três categorias: a experiência montessoriana na prática escolar; a aprendizagem com uso dos agrupamentos na educação infantil; e, o protagonismo dos docentes na escola montessoriana. A pesquisa permitiu entender a complexidade e as possibilidades que marcam esta metodologia que visa uma educação humanizada, a autonomia da criança, com foco voltado ao desenvolvimento do educando para que possa exercitar a liberdade de expressão, imergir em práticas que envolvam o corpo e a mente, dentro de seu próprio ritmo, espaço e tempo. Os resultados demonstram que os princípios da pedagogia de Montessori ainda nos servem de referência quando se trata de pensar ambientes que acolhem e educam crianças, especialmente na primeira infância, para que se possa implementar práticas e metodologias mais ativas. Por fim, é possível afirmar que o método é humanizador, pois as crianças inseridas nesse contexto aprendem para vida, desenvolvendo sua autonomia e independência no processo de ensino e aprendizagem.
37
Curatola, Annamaria. „The Contribution of Maria Montessori's Pedagogy and her Educational Action to Modern Inclusive Policies“. International Journal of Digital Literacy and Digital Competence 7, Nr. 4 (Oktober 2016): 37–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/ijdldc.2016100103.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Maria Montessori's influence on modern inclusive policies, in particular in relation to school education, is really remarkable. Her culture, pedagogical intuitions, her institutional projects and her methodological and didactic innovations influenced profoundly our views on education, offering a detailed and original understanding of childhood as the foundation of a mature, critical and democratic society. Maria Montessori's ideas, based on solid philosophical and anthropological grounds, not only found validation by embracing and implementing the achievements of various sciences pertaining to human evolutional development and its social community, but also shed light on research topics that are still object of scholarly attention. This is testified to by the fact that her educational methods are still relevant today, and they can be easily adapted to the change in life conditions and the widespread use of new media technologies. Cooperative work, mutual assistance, individually tailored education, reading, curricular and extracurricular activities, the tailoring of learning environments to the individual pupil, the need to monitor and evaluate learning outcomes, the design and experimentation of teaching, social involvement, use of technological aides, as well as inclusive and integrative education, are but a few of the foundations of her philosophy. Hence the importance of her ideas to this day.
38
Betancourt-Odio, Manuel Alejandro, Andresa Sartor-Harada, Oscar Ulloa-Guerra und Juliana Azevedo-Gomes. „Self-Perceptions on Digital Competences for M-Learning and Education Sustainability: A Study with Teachers from Different Countries“. Sustainability 13, Nr. 1 (02.01.2021): 343. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13010343.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
The current international landscape shows that the most common alternative for the continuity of formative learning processes during the coronavirus pandemic has been the use the of e-learning to support children’s learning in environments outside of school. This forced change in teaching methods has consolidated the recognition that the digital skills of teachers are a relevant factor for the sustainability of education, both during the pandemic and in a future post-pandemic period or in other emergencies. In this sense, the objective of this study carried out between May and September 2020 was to determine the perceptions of 427 teachers from 15 countries about their digital competences in working with m-learning in primary education using a Montessori approach. The results of the questionnaire showed that teachers perceive their digital competences as inert and not very effective for innovation compared with the subsistence of traditional pedagogical practices, to deal with unpredictable situations or to generate differentiated adaptations for an inclusive education. The results of this study also serve as empirical support for establishing four training dimensions that can be considered priorities for the construction and implementation of a teacher training model that contributes to the sustainable development of education.
39
Vorobiova, Lolita. „American Experience of the Dalton Plan in the Dutch Schooling“. Comparative Professional Pedagogy 9, Nr. 2 (01.06.2019): 74–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/rpp-2019-0021.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Abstract This article presents the results of scientific-pedagogical research, which consisted in analyzing the American experience of the Dalton plan in the schooling of the Netherlands, the ranking surveys according to strict criteria, and the implementation of an adapted version of the original American pedagogical model of the Dalton Plan in the schooling of Holland; characterizing the features of the introduction of the Dalton Plan into the Dutch educational systems. While researching the works of M. Montessory, H. Parkhurst and D. Lager, had been examined as the main source of the study. The archival documents of the biggest collection of Helen Parkhurst papers of the Archive of University of Wisconsin Stevens Point had been analyzed. It was studied that American experience of the Dalton Plan is top ranked among private institutions of the country. It is obvious that after the United States, the country of the Dalton Plan origin, the continental Europe and Holland have a dominant position regarding the implementation of the Dalton plan in the educational systems. It is stated that schools implementing the Dalton Plan are united in recognizing the fact that such a pedagogical model ensures the development of the student’s individuality and his social experience. The special advantage the Dalton students obtain is the ability to use different approaches and sources in seeking information that is necessary for the organization and achievement of their own research. The ideas of the Dalton Plan can be justified in the light of modern theory and research. The Dalton Plan was successfully implemented into the primary and secondary schools of the Netherlands ranked the counrty11th in the world education survey. The Dalton Plan philosophy became one of the components of the complicated Dutch educational system.
40
Rahmawati, Miftah Sigit, und Irman Amri. „The Role of Parents at Mathematics Learning Innovation in Early Education“. Indonesian Journal of Early Childhood Education Studies 9, Nr. 1 (10.06.2020): 40–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.15294/ijeces.v9i1.38349.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
In digital era, it is possible for the term "home education" which presents the role of the family to the childhood education. The development of children's mathematics involved role of parents lies, so a mechanism needs to be established about the importance of mathematics learning in the early years and its forms about mathematical activities for children. Learning mathematics in early childhood connects the use of formative values, namely observation, assignments, and interviews for planned teaching. Pedagogical practice focuses on the involvement of children in games, reading stories/picture books, doing project work, and learning mathematics through art or physics. This gives the explanation that children in early education with their settings involve mathematical ideas. This research aims to provide solutions and ideas for parents in teaching children of early age (0-3) years old on mathematics. This research also provides an explanation of parental involvement in teaching mathematics by playing together and preparing children to face mathematics at the next level. The research method used is based on field research, literature studies, and observations. Report of evaluation and observation provide good results with the use of one of the learning methods, namely the montessori method. It also gives an explanation of the importance of togetherness of children and parents in learning mathematics without eliminating children's play time.
41
Rozin, Vadim Markovich. „The analysis the family-type Pavel Shivarev’s (non) school “The Searchers”“. Педагогика и просвещение, Nr. 2 (Februar 2021): 165–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.7256/2454-0676.2021.2.35216.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Thus article analyzes the concept and experience of the Kaliningrad (non ) school of Pavel Shivarev. The author lists the key principles of its operation: organizing education outside the classroom system, active participation of the child's family in educational process, activity of children in different age groups, orientation towards individualization of education. The article discusses the attitude of parents to fully invest education of their children and do no enroll them into a public school. The author examines the principal theoretical and pedagogical provisions “The Searchers” (non) school is founded on: revised Montessori system, environmental approach, focus on individualization of education, use of modern methodological and psychological techniques. Attention is given to the important role of environment created in the (non) school. The author believes that namely such environment guides the pedagogues and parents towards development and evolution of children. In The three subsystems are distinguished within this environment: anthropological, object-semiotic, and purely semiotic. The environmental approach allows analyzing the act of learning, which implies actualization of the problem situation, unconscious response of the body to it, conscious activity on building the patterns and solving the problem situation, awareness of the obtained solution. The article reviews two perspectives of culture the students are being introduced to in “The Searchers” (non) school: accepted in the state, and shared by the family and pedagogues of the (non) school. In conclusion, the author raises the three complex topics: the social nature of education, the role of subjective factor of development, and the attitude of new education towards traditional.
42
Ozola, Aija. „YOUNG CHILDREN’S FREEDOM OF CHOICE IN CHILD-CENTRED EDUCATIONAL PRACTICE“. SOCIETY. INTEGRATION. EDUCATION. Proceedings of the International Scientific Conference 2 (26.05.2017): 308. http://dx.doi.org/10.17770/sie2017vol2.2300.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
The importance of young children’s freedom of choice has been discussed since Froebel’s and Montessori’s contribution to the pedagogical ideas related to early childhood education. However, the theoretical framework of the term and its contents in modern early childhood education does not offer detailed description and would rather be characterized as incomplete and fragmented. The current study is an attempt to partly fill the gap between educational theory and practice basing on early childhood teachers’ empirical experience and beliefs on children’s freedom of choice.
The aim of the study is to identify early childhood teachers’ beliefs on children’s freedom of choice in child-centred educational practice. Focus group discussions were conducted with early childhood teachers implementing early childhood curriculum in municipal early childhood education institutions located in Riga, the capital city of Latvia. Data were analysed using the method of qualitative content analysis. The findings revealed very positive attitude of teachers towards children’s freedom of choice and existence of teachers’ personal meaning of the term and its contents. The benefits and possible risks of implementing children’s freedom of choice were identified as well as factors enabling and hindering its implementation.
43
Miranda, Sergio, Antonio Marzano und Miltiades D. Lytras. „A research initiative on the construction of innovative environments for teaching and learning. Montessori and Munari based psycho-pedagogical insights in computers and human behavior for the “new school”“. Computers in Human Behavior 66 (Januar 2017): 282–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2016.09.056.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
44
Dzhus, Oksana. „Issues of Inclusion and Special Education in the Creative Heritage of Sofia Rusova“. Journal of Vasyl Stefanyk Precarpathian National University 7, Nr. 1 (21.04.2020): 71–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.15330/jpnu.7.1.71-80.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
The article analyzes the issues of inclusion and special education in the creative heritage of Sofia Rusova – teacher, citizen, politician, state maker, who considered them in the context of world scientific achievements of the interwar period of the XX century. Inclusion, as a process of increasing the participation of all citizens in society, including those with physical or mental disabilities, involves the development and implementation of specific solutions that will allow each person to participate equally in academic and public life. The evolution of the idea of inclusion and the birth of special education S. Rusova closely linked with the understanding and interpretation of the leading principles of pedagogy, general and social psychology, sociology, philosophy of education, historical and pedagogical searches of the late XIX - early XX century. Perhaps the most important source of new pedagogical ideas of S. Rusova, embodied in the writings of the interwar period (“New School of Social Education”, “Education and Sociology of Durkheim”, “Social Education: Its Importance in Public Life”, “Public Issues of Education” became acquainted with the latest trends in Western European pedagogy, which allowed her to keep up with the times, psychologize pedagogy. Extensive education, fluency in the leading European languages (first and foremost, French) made it possible for S. Rusova to access the original literature - works by J. Dewey, E. Claapared, G. Kerschensteiner, V. Lai, E. Meiman, and G. Spencer with the most prominent pedagogical figures of the 1920s and 1930s, including O. Decroly and M. Montessori, and studying the experience of their practical work. Guided by the statement that “ development of the child is influenced by three main factors: education, heritage, and environment”, based on the experiments of foreign (German, Belgian, Czech) researches, the scientist revealed the specifics of social and educational impact of the environment, preparing the groundwork inclusion as a set of conditions, methods and means of their implementation for joint learning, education and development of the educational recipients, taking into account their needsand opportunities. At the same time, I emphasize the shaft that no child “is passively influenced by the environment: it takes from it what its individuality seeks.” The issue of special education, in particular, the psychological and pedagogical principles of working with children with intellectual disabilities, is most fully revealed in S. Rusova's work, “Something about defective children in school”. It clearly traces the idea that children of all walks of life are necessarily subject to process education and training. According to S. Rusova, children with deviant behavior (in particular, “child offenders”), for whom the conditions for education as a factor of their re-education should be created, and for the needs of such schools, should not be left out of the educational influence in order to organize teacher training “with a deep psychological understanding of their sick students, with a heart warmed with love for them, and with a certain understanding of their social and pedagogical task: to return these children to citizenship ...”. Summarizing the above, it can be argued that the issues of inclusion, studying, education of children and young people with special educational needs, as represented by the property of Sofia Rusova are a significant contribution to Ukrainian and world pedagogical thought, an important factor in the revival of national educational systems in the teaching experiences of the past.
45
Byker, Erik Jon, S. Michael Putman, Laura Handler und Drew Polly. „Educational Technology and Student Voice: Examining Teacher Candidates’ Perceptions“. World Journal on Educational Technology: Current Issues 6, Nr. 3 (05.08.2017): 119. http://dx.doi.org/10.18844/wjet.v6i3.1687.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
Student Voice is a term that honors the participatory roles that students have when they enter learning spaces like classrooms. Student Voice is the recognition of students’ choice, creativity, and freedom. Seminal educationists—like Dewey and Montessori—centered the purposes of education in the flourishing and valuing of Student Voice. This article examines the relationship between the integration of educational technology and Student Voice . In particular, the article describes and reports on a mixed-methods study of teacher candidates’ (n=63) perceptions of and practices with integrating digital technology and Student Voice. The article has two objectives. The first objective is to examine how teacher candidates construct and define the term Student Voice. The second objective is to describe how teacher candidates integrate digital technology and Student Voice into their lesson plan ideas. The study had three findings. First, the teacher candidates most closely defined and connected Student Voice with creative freedom. Second, although the teacher candidates had learner-centered definitions for Student Voice it was difficult for them to translate their definitions into actual lesson plan ideas that included the integration of educational technology in order for students to create so that their voices could be heard. Third, the student questionnaire data also illustrated how teacher candidates had varied perceptions of the relationship between technology and Student Voice; the candidates were more likely to describe elementary students’ primary use of technology as “using apps or software to practice subject-area skills” or “playing educational games” than any other technology-rich activities. The teacher candidates were disconnected in their perceptions about what Student Voice meant and their proposed pedagogies to enhance Student Voice with digital technologies. To address the disconnect, the article discusses strategies that can guide teacher candidates to integrate educational technology into their lesson plans to allow students to create and for the Student Voice to resonate throughout the classroom community.
46
Miranda, Sergio, Antonio Marzano und Miltiades D. Lytras. „Corrigendum to “A research initiative on the construction of innovative environments for teaching and learning. Montessori and Munari based psycho-pedagogical insights in computers and human behavior for the “New School”” [Computers in Human Behavior 66 (2017) 282–290]“. Computers in Human Behavior 75 (Oktober 2017): 1019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2017.02.008.
Der volle Inhalt der Quelle
47
Ndraha, Venny Eria, und Mozes Kurniawan. „Playing "CABE" (Searching and Whispering) to Increase Children’s English Vocabulary“. JPUD - Jurnal Pendidikan Usia Dini 13, Nr. 1 (30.04.2019): 143–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.21009/10.21009/jpud.131.11.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
This study aims to increase children English vocabulary aged 5-6 years old by playing CABE or searching and whispering. This research is classroom action research that was conducted in Marsudirini Sang Timur Kindergarten, Salatiga. The Subjects of the study were 20 B1 kindergarten children. Data was collected by teaching English vocabulary by playing CABE in some cycles which includes four stages in the form of cycles, there are (1) planning; (2) implementation; (3) observation; and (4) reflection. Research instruments used in this research was in sheets observation checklist. The results of a percentage of pre-cycle was 13 %, cycle I was 31 % in first meeting and was 66 % in the second meeting, cycle II was 75 % performed in only one meeting. There is an improvement in pre-action and any action on each meeting until it reaches 75 %.
Keywords: Early childhood, English vocabulary, “CABE” method, Learning English
References
Bawono, Y. (2017). Kemampuan berbahasa pada anak prasekolah : Sebuah kajian pustaka. Prosiding Temu Ilmiah X Ikatan Psikologi Perkembangan Indonesia.
Chamot, A. U. (1987). Toward a Functional ESL Curriculum in the Elementary School, in Long, Michael H. & Richards, Jack C. (eds.) Methodology in TESOL. New York: Newburry House Publishers.
Fromkin, V., Rodman, R., & H., & N. (1990). An Intoduction to Language. New York, NY: Avon Books.
İlin, G., Kutlu, Ö., & Kutluay, A. (2013). An Action Research: Using Videos for Teaching Grammar in an ESP Class. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2013.01.065
Imam, I. (2016). Meningkatkan Kemampuan Menyimak Siswa Kelas I Melalui Teknik Permainan Pesan Berantai Pada Pembalajaran Bahasa Indonesia. PEDAGOGIA: Jurnal Pendidikan. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21070/pedagogia.v3i2.62
Khairani, A. I. (2016). Pendidikan Bahasa Inggris Untuk Anak Usia Dini. Digilib.Unimed.Ac.Id.
Kurniawan, M., & Tanone, R. (2016). Mobile learning in TESOL: A golden bridge for enhancement of grammar awareness and vocabulary mastery? Asian EFL Journal.
Kurniawan, M., & Tanone, R. (2016). Mobile learning in TESOL: A golden bridge for enhancement of grammar awareness and vocabulary mastery? Asian EFL Journal.
Matondang, E. M. (2005). Menumbuhkan Minat Belajar Bahasa Inggris Anak Usia Dini melalui Lagu dan Gerak. Jakarta: Jurnal Pendidikan Penabur.
Montessori, M. (1991). The discovery of the Child. New York: Ballatine Book.
Muflihah, M. (2019). Pentingnya Peran BAhasa dalam Pendidikan Usia DIni (PAUD). ThufuLA: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Guru Raudhatul Athfal. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21043/thufula.v2i2.4642
Mustafa, B. (2007). Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini.
Musthafa, B. (2010). Teaching English to Young Learners in Indonesia : Essential Requirements. Educationist.
Nugrahani, D., Egar, N., Sumardiyani, L., & Wardoyo, S. L. (2017). PENDIDIKAN ANAK USIA DINI BERBASIS LIFE SKILLS. E-DIMAS. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.26877/e-dimas.v2i1.102
Nurjanah, N, Dwiastuty, Nina, Susilawati, S. (2015). Mengenalkan Model Pengajaran Edutainment Mengajarkan Bahasa Inggris Pada Anak–Anak Usia Dini. Faktor. Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan.
Nurmadiah, N. (2018). Strategi Pembelajaran Anak Usia Dini. Al-Afkar : Jurnal Keislaman & Peradaban. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.28944/afkar.v3i1.101
Nurvitasari, M. D. (2016). Penerapan Aspek Perkembangan Anak Usia Dini Dalam Media Macca (Balok Susun Interaktif).
O’Grady, W. (2008). Innateness, universal grammar, and emergentism. Lingua. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1016/j.lingua.2007.03.005
Santrock, J. (n.d.). Adolesence (Fifth Edit). New York, NY: McGrawHill Company Inc.
Sophya, I. V. (2019). Desain Pembelajaran BAhasa Inggris untuk Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini. ThufuLA: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Guru Raudhatul Athfal. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.21043/thufula.v2i2.4639
Tomlinson, B. (2012). Materials development for language learning and languange teaching. https://doi.org/https://doi.org/10.1017/S0261444811000528
Vygotsky, L. S. (1986). Thought and Language. Cambridge, M.A.: The MIT Press
Wiratno, T., & Santosa, R. (2003). Bahasa, Fungsi Bahasa, dan Konteks Sosial. Bahasa, Fungsi Bahasa, Dan Konteks Sosial
Yamin, M. (2010). Panduan Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini. Jakarta: Gaung Persada Pers
Zaini, A. (2015). Bermain sebagai metode pembelajaran bagi anak usia dini. ThufuLA: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Guru Raudhatul Athfal
48
Dhieni, Nurbiana, Sofia Hartati und Sri Wulan. „Evaluation of Content Curriculum in Kindergarten“. JPUD - Jurnal Pendidikan Usia Dini 13, Nr. 1 (30.04.2019): 72–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.21009/10.21009/jpud.131.06.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
This research aimed to map the quality curriculum used of kindergartens in Jakarta. The mapping curriculum was done by looking at the suitability curriculum with the stages of child development, needs of children, using the child-centered learning process, and taking ad-vantage of technological development. Subjects were 32 kindergarten institutions in Jakarta (North Jakarta and Jakarta Central), from 14 districts. Kindergarten institutions selected by representing every district. In collecting data, the researchers conducted an analysis content of curriculum and interview with respondents and informants in kindergarten institutions ei-ther principals or teachers in schools who selected as samples. The research team conducted a meeting to gather information that recorded as a result of observation and described in-depth interviews in the diary of researchers — the data collected from 16 kindergartens that are willing to research subject. The data consisted of curriculum documents, curriculum evaluation instruments and interviews’ result that analyzed qualitatively from the beginning of the data collection process including data reduction, data presentation, and conclusion.
Keyword: Content, Curriculum, Evaluation, Kindergarten
References
Burchinal, M. (2018). Measuring Early Care and Education Quality. Child Development Perspectives, 12(1), 3–9. https://doi.org/10.1111/cdep.12260
Dhieni, N., & Utami, A. D. (2013). Evaluasi Konten Kurikulum Taman Kanak-Kanak di DKI Jakarta Tahun ke 1 dari rencana 3 tahun. Jakarta: FIP press.
Dodge, D. T. (2004). Early Childhood Curriculum Models Why What and How Programs Use them. Exchange Organizational Behavior Teaching Journal, (February), 71–75.
Eliason, C., & Jenkins, L. (2008). A Practical Guide to Early Childhood Curriculum 8th. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Fox-turnbull, W. (2007). Implementing Digital Technology in The New Zealand Curriculum.
Gestwicki, C. (2007). Developmentally Appropriate Practice Curriculum, and Development in Early Education 3rd Ed. New York: Thomson Delmar.
Hainstock, E. G. (2002). Montessori untuk Prasekolah. Jakarta: Pustaka Delapratasa.
Hasan, S. H. (2008). Evaluasi Kurikulum. (U. & R. Rosdakarya, Ed.). Bandung.
Haslip, M. J., & Gullo, D. F. (2018). The Changing Landscape of Early Childhood Education: Implications for Policy and Practice. Early Childhood Education Journal, 46(3), 249–264. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10643-017-0865-7
Jackman, H. L. (2012). Early Education Curriculum: A Child’s Connection to the World Fifth Edition. Belmont: Wadsworth: Cengage Learning.
Jacman, H. (2012). Early Education Curriculum. Pedagogical Development Unit, (FEBRUARY 2011), 163. Retrieved from https://www.eursc.eu/Syllabuses/2011-01-D-15-en-4.pdf
Kostelnik, M. J., Soderman, A. K., & P, A. (2007). Whiren, Developmentally Appro-priate Curriculum: Best Practices in Early Childhood Education 4th. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Mak, B., Keung, C., & Cheung, A. (2018). Analyzing Curriculum Orientations of Kindergarten Curriculum. In Teacher Education, Learning Innovation and Accountability, (pp. 135–153). Singapore: Springer Singapore. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2026-2
Odom, S. L., Butera, G., Diamond, K. E., Hanson, M. J., Horn, E., Lieber, J., … Marquis, J. (2019). Efficacy of a Comprehensive Early Childhood Curriculum to Enhance Children’s Success. Topics in Early Childhood Special Education. https://doi.org/10.1177/0271121419827654
Plowman, L., Stephen, C., & Mcpake, J. (2010). Growing Up with Technology (pp. 1–169). London and New York: Routledge.
Roopnarine, J. L., & Johnson, J. E. (2005). Approaches to Early Childhood Education 4th Ed,. New Jersey: Pearson Prentice Hall.
Sarama, J., & Clements, D. H. (2019). From Cognition to Curriculum to Scale. Cognitive Foundations for Improving Mathematical Learning. https://doi.org/10.1016/b978-0-12-815952-1.00006-2
Wood, E., & Hedges, H. (2016). Curriculum in early childhood education: critical questions about content, coherence, and control. Curriculum Journal, 27(3), 387–405. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2015.1129981
Yang, W., & Li, H. (2019). Changing culture, changing curriculum: a case study of early childhood curriculum innovations in two Chinese kindergartens. Curriculum Journal, 0(0), 1–19. https://doi.org/10.1080/09585176.2019.1568269
49
Fauzi, Chandra, und Basikin. „The Impact of the Whole Language Approach Towards Children Early Reading and Writing in English“. JPUD - Jurnal Pendidikan Usia Dini 14, Nr. 1 (30.04.2020): 87–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.21009/jpud.141.07.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
This study aims to determine the effect of the whole language approach to the ability to read and write in English in early stages of children aged 5-6 years in one of the kindergartens in the Yogyakarta Special Region. The population in this study were 43 children who were in the age range of 5-6 years in the kindergarten. Twenty-nine participants were included in the experimental class subjects as well as the control class with posttest only control group design. Observation is a way to record data in research on early reading and writing ability. The results of Multivariate Anal- ysis of Covariance (Manova) to the data shows that 1) there is a difference in ability between the application of the whole language approach and the conventional approach to the ability to read the beginning of English; 2) there is a difference in ability between applying a whole language approach and a conventional approach to writing English beginning skills; 3) there is a difference in ability between the whole language approach and the conventional approach to the ability to read and write the beginning in English
Keywords: Whole language approach, Early reading, Early writing, Early childhood
Reference
Abdurrahman, M. (2003). Pendidikan bagi Anak Berkesulitan Belajar. Jakarta: Rineka Cipta.
Aisyah, S., Yarmi, G., & Bintoro, T. (2018). Pendekatan Whole Language dalam Pengembangan Kemampuan Membaca Permulaan Siswa Sekolah Dasar. Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan, 160–163.
Alhaddad, A. S. (2014). Joedanian Literacy Education Should Whole Language be Implemented? European Scientific Journal, 10(8).
Aulina, C. N., & Rezania, V. (2013). Metode Whole Language untuk Pembelajaran Bahasa Pada Anak TK. Pendidikan Usia Dini.
Austring, B. D., & Sørensen, M. (2012). A Scandinavian View on the Aesthetics as a Learning Media. Journal of Modern Education Review, 2(2), 90–101.
Cahyani, H., Courcy, M. de, & Barnett, J. (2018). Teachers’ code-switching in bilingual classrooms: exploring pedagogical and sociocultural functions. International Journal of Bilingual Education and Bilingualism, 21(4), 465–479.
Cahyani, W. A. (2019). Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Membaca pada Anak Usia Dini. Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta.
CCSU NEWS. (2019). World’s Most Literate Nations Ranked. In WORLD’S MOST LITERATE NATIONS RANKED.
Chodidjah, I. (2007). Teacher training for low proficiency level primary English language teachers: How it is working in Indonesia. In British Council (Ed.) Primary Innovations: A Collection of Papers, 87–94.
Crystal, D. (2003). The Cambridge Encyclopedia of the English Language (second Edi). Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Dhieni, N., Fridani, L., Muis, A., & Yarmi, G. (2014). Metode Perkembangan Bahasa. Universitas Terbuka, 1(155.4), 1–28.
Dixon, J., & Sumon, T. (1996). Whole Language: An Integrated Approach to Reading and Writing. Action-Learning Manuals for Adult Literacy, 4.
Doman, G. (1985). Ajaklah Balita Anda Belajar Meembaca. Bandung: CV. Yrama Widya.
Fat, N. (2015). Ranking Minat Baca Pelajar Indonesia. In Minat Baca Indonesia.
Flores, N. (2013). Undoing Truth in Language Teaching: Toward a Paradigm of Linguistic Aesthetics. Working Papers in Educational Linguistics (WPEL), 28(2).
Folkmann, M. N. (2010). Evaluating aesthetics in design: A phenomenological approach. The MIT Press, 26(1), 40–53.
Froese, V. (1991). Whole Language Practice and Theory. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.Gagne, R. M., & Briggs, L. J. (1996). Principle of Instructional Design. New York: Richard and
Winston.Gardner, H. (2013). Multiple Intelegences : The Theory in ractice a Reader. New York: Basic. Goodman, K. (1986). What‟s whole in whole language. Portsmouth: NH: Heinemann.
Goodman, K. S. (1986). What’s Whole in Whole Language? A Parent/Teacher Guide to Children’s Learning. Heinemann Educational Books, Inc: 70 Court St., Portsmouth, NH 03801.
Hammerby, H. (1982). Synthesis in Second Language Teaching. Blane: Second Language.
Hardinansyah, V. (2017). Analisis Kebutuhan pada Pengajaran Bahasa Inggris di PG-PAUD. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Pembelajaran Anak Usia Dini, 4(2), 92–102.
Jamaris, M. (2006). Perkembangan dan Pengembangan Anak Usia Dini Taman Kanak-kanak. Jakarta: Gramedia Widiasarana.
Krashen, S. D. (1981). Second Language Acquisition and Second Language Learning (Wesley Longman Ltd, ed.). Addison.
Krashen, S., Long, M. H., & Scarcella, R. (1979). Accounting for child-adult differences in second language rate and attainment. TESOL Quarterly, 13, 573-82.
Ling-Ying, & Huang. (2014). Learning to Read with the Whole Language Approach: The Teacher’s View. Canadian Center of Science and Education : English Language Teaching, 5(7).
Ling, P. (2012). The “Whole Language” Theory and Its Application to the Teaching of English Reading. Journal of Canadian Center of Science and Education, 5(3).
Maulidia, C. R., Fadillah, & Miranda, D. (2019). Pengaruh Pendekatan Whole Language Terhadap Kemampuan Membaca 5-6 Tahun di TK Mawar Khatulistiwa. Program Studi Pendidikan Guru PAUD FKIP Untan Pontianak, 8(7).
Mayuni, I., & Akhadiah, S. (2016). Whole Language-Based English Reading Materials. International Journal of Applied Linguistics & English Literature, 5(3).
Meha, N., & Roshonah, A. F. (2014). Implementasi Whole Language Approach sebagai Pengembangan Model Pembelajaran Berbahasa Awal Anak Usia 5-6 Tahun di PAUD Non Formal. Jurnal Pendidikan, 15(1), 68–82.
Moats, L. (2007). Whole language high jinks: How to Tell When “Scientifically-Based Reading Instruction” Isn’t. Washington: Thomas B. Fordham Institute.
Montessori, D. M. (1991). The discovery of the Child. New York: Ballatine Books.Morrow, L. M. (1993). Literacy Development in the Early Years. United States of America: Allyn
& Bacon.Munandar, A. (2013). Pemakaian Bahasa Jawa Dalam Situasi Kontak Bahasa di Daerah Istimewa
Yogyakarta. Jurnal Sastra Inggris, 25(1), 92–102.
Musfiroh, T. (2009). Menumbuhkembangkan Baca-Tulis Anak Usia Dini. Yogyakarta: Grasindo.
Nirwana. (2015). Peningkatan Kemampuan Membaca Cepat Melalui Pendekatan Whole Language pada Siswa Kelas VI SD Negeri 246 Bulu-Bulu Kecamatan Tonra Kabupaten Bone. Jurnal Onoma: Pendidikan, Bahasa, Dan Sastra, 1(1), 79-94., 1(1), 79–94.
Novitasari, D. R. (2010). Pembangunan Media Pembelajaran Bahasa Inggris Untuk Siswa Kelas 1 Pada Sekolah Dasar Negeri 15 Sragen. Sentra Penelitian Engineering Dan Edukas, Volume 2 N.
Oladele, A. O., & Oladele, I. T. (2016). Effectiveness of Collaborative Strategic Reading and Whole Language Approach on Reading Comprehension Performance of Children with Learning Disabilities in Oyo State Nigeria Adetoun. International Journal on Language, Literature and Culture in Education, 3(1), 1–24.
Olusegun, B. S. (2015). Constructivism Learning Theory: A Paradigm for Teaching and Learning. Journal of Research & Method in Education, 5(6), 66–70.
Ortega, L. (2009). Understanding Second Language Acquisition. New York: Routledge.Otto, B. (2015). Perkembangan Bahasa Pada Anak Usia DIni (third Edit). Jakarta: Prenadamedia.
Papalia, D., Old, S., & Feldman, R. (2008). Human Development (Psikologi Perkembangan). Jakarta: Kencana.
Papalia, Old, & Feldman. (2009). Human Development (Psikologi Perkembangan (Kesembilan). Jakarta: Kencana.
Pellini, A. PISA worldwide ranking; Indonesia’s PISA results show need to use education resources more efficiently. , (2016).
Phakiti, A. (2014). Experimental Research Methods in Language Learning. London: Bloomsbury Academic.
Rahim, F. (2015). Pengajaran Bahasa di Sekolah Dasar. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.
Routman, R. (2014). Read, write, lead: Breakthrough strategies for schoolwide literacy success.
Sadtono, E. (2007). A concise history of TEFL in Indonesia. English Education in Asia: History and Policies, 205–234.
Sani, R.A. (2013). Inovasi Pembelajaran. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.Sani, Ridwan A. (2013). Inovasi Pembelajaran. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara. Santrock, J. W. (2016). Children (Thirteenth). New York: McGraw-Hill Education.
Saracho, O. N. (2017). Literacy and language: new developments in research, theory, and practice. Early Childhood Development and Care, 3(4), 187. https://doi.org/10.1080/03004430.2017.1282235
Semiawan, C. R. (1983). Memupuk Bakat dan Minat Kreativitas Siswa Sekolah Menengah. Jakarta: Gramedia Pustaka Utama.
Sikki, E. A. A., Rahman, A., Hamra, A., & Noni, N. (2013). The Competence of Primary School English Teachers in Indonesia. Journal of Education and Practice, 4(11), 139–146.
Siskandar. (2009). Kurikulum Berbasis Kompetensi. Jakarta: Fasilitator.
Solchan, T. W., Mulyati, Y., Syarif, M., Yunus, M., Werdiningsih, E., Pramuki, B. E., & Setiawati, L. (2008). Pendidikan Bahasa Indonesia di SD. Jakarta. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka.
Solehudin, O. (2007). Model Pembelajaran Membaca Reading Workshop: Studi Kuasi Eksperimen di SD Muhammadiyah VII Bandung (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia). Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia.
Suparno, S., & Yunus, M. (2007). Keterampilan Dasar Menulis. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka. Susanto, A. (2011). Perkembangan Anak Usia Dini Pengantar dalam Berbagai Aspeknya.
Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media Group.
Suyanto, K. K. E. (2010). Teaching English as foreign language to young learners. Jakarta: State University of Malang.
Tarigan, D. (2001). Pendidikan Bahasa dan sastra Indonesia Kelas Rendah. Jakarta: Universitas Terbuka.
Trask, R. L., & Trask, R. L. (1996). Historical linguistics. New York: Oxford University Press. Ur, P. (1996). A course in Language Teaching. Practice and Theory. Cambridge: Cambridge.
University Press.
Williams, A. L., McLeod, S., & McCauley, R. J. (2010). Interventions for Speech Sound Disorders in Children. Brookes Publishing Company.: PO Box 10624; Baltimore; MD 21285.
Wright, P., Wallance, J., & McCAarthy, J. (2008). Aesthetics and experience-centered design. ACM Transactions on Computer-Human Interaction (TOCHI), 15(4), 18.
50
Eret, Lidija, und Narcisa Jagnjić. „The Confirmation of Montessori Postulates in Contemporary Educational Neuroscience / Potvrde postulata Montessori pedagogije u suvremenoj obrazovnoj neuroznanosti“. Croatian Journal of Education - Hrvatski časopis za odgoj i obrazovanje 22, Nr. 4 (22.01.2021). http://dx.doi.org/10.15516/cje.v22i4.3751.
Der volle Inhalt der QuelleAnnotation:
This paper lends insight into the fundamental postulates of Montessori pedagogyand definitions of contemporary educational neuroscience, focusing on the needsand solutions of contemporary didactic approaches. By presenting the results ofcontemporary researches, the paper connects the achievements of Montessoripedagogic methods and strategies with the scientific indicators of educationalneuroscience about the manners of positive impact on the development of anindividual. The results of the educational neuroscience research will corroborate thepostulates of Montessori pedagogy that state that understanding the developmentalstages of upbringing, individual competences, and specificities of each child areimportant for upbringing. Specific cases will be used to emphasize that, apartfrom the cognitive competence, it is essential to develop psychomotor and affectivecompetences, meaning that the development of these personality spheres isconnected and interdependent. By providing the pedagogic perspective, the paperpoints to the need for further deliberation on how to shape an optimal curriculum.The paper suggests that various social and technological changes are reasons toconsider pedagogic methods, strategies, and approaches of Montessori, which is alsosupported and substantiated by contemporary educational neuroscience.Key words: didactics; Montessori pedagogy; neurodidactics; neuroscience. - U ovom radu daje se uvid u osnovne postulate Montessori pedagogije i definicijesuvremene obrazovne neuroznanosti, orijentirajući se prema potrebama i rješenjimaza suvremene didaktičke pristupe. Prikazom rezultata suvremenih istraživanja radpovezuje dostignuća Montessori pedagoških metoda i strategija sa znanstvenimpokazateljima obrazovne neuroznanosti o načinima pozitivnoga utjecaja na razvojpojedinca. Rezultati istraživanja obrazovne neuroznanosti potkrijepit će postulateMontessori pedagogije da je za odgojni pristup važno razumijevanje razvojnih fazaodrastanja, individualnosti kompetencija i specifičnosti odgajanika. Specifičnimprimjerima naglasit će se da je uz kognitivne, bitno razvijati psihomotorne iafektivne kompetencije, odnosno da je razvoj ovih sfera ličnosti povezan imeđuovisan. Ponuđenom pedagoškom perspektivom rad ukazuje na potrebudaljnjega razmatranja kako pristupiti oblikovanju optimalnih kurikula. U radu sesugerira da je upravo zbog različitih društvenih i tehnoloških promjena potrebnorazmišljati o pedagoškim metodama, strategijama i pristupima Montessoripedagogije, što podržava i potkrepljuje suvremena obrazovna neuroznanost.Ključne riječi: didaktika; Montessori pedagogija; neurodidaktika; neuroznanost.