Auswahl der wissenschaftlichen Literatur zum Thema „Renonciation à l’immunité d’exécution“
Geben Sie eine Quelle nach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard und anderen Zitierweisen an
Machen Sie sich mit den Listen der aktuellen Artikel, Bücher, Dissertationen, Berichten und anderer wissenschaftlichen Quellen zum Thema "Renonciation à l’immunité d’exécution" bekannt.
Neben jedem Werk im Literaturverzeichnis ist die Option "Zur Bibliographie hinzufügen" verfügbar. Nutzen Sie sie, wird Ihre bibliographische Angabe des gewählten Werkes nach der nötigen Zitierweise (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver usw.) automatisch gestaltet.
Sie können auch den vollen Text der wissenschaftlichen Publikation im PDF-Format herunterladen und eine Online-Annotation der Arbeit lesen, wenn die relevanten Parameter in den Metadaten verfügbar sind.
Zeitschriftenartikel zum Thema "Renonciation à l’immunité d’exécution":
Alland, Denis, und Thibaut Fleury Graff. „Les limites de la renonciation par l’État à son immunité d’exécution“. Revue critique de droit international privé N° 1, Nr. 1 (01.01.2016): 1–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/rcdip.161.0001.
Tassé, Roger. „Les relations entre l’État et le citoyen : évolution historique, situation actuelle et avenir“. Revue générale de droit 16, Nr. 1 (02.05.2019): 5–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/1059306ar.
Demaria, Tiphaine. „Nouveaux développements relatifs à l’article 98-1 du Statut de Rome“. Revue québécoise de droit international, 21.11.2018, 125–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/1056227ar.
Dissertationen zum Thema "Renonciation à l’immunité d’exécution":
Vodounon-Djegni, Comlan René. „L’exécution des sentences arbitrales contre les personnes publiques de l’OHADA“. Thesis, Université Côte d'Azur, 2022. http://www.theses.fr/2022COAZ0008.
The thesis focuses on " The execution of arbitral awards against public persons of OHADA ". Its purpose is to demonstrate how to implement these sentences without coming up against the immunity from execution of the persons who benefit from them. Indeed, in the absence of an arbitration exception, the prohibition of forced execution and interim measures against these persons seems to extend to the forced execution of arbitral awards against public persons of the OHADA. However, like the latter, immunity from execution also has a contractual basis ; it is a rule of public order of protection which the beneficiary can waive. Therefore, its application would only be required if its beneficiary has not waived it. However, to be valid, the waiver of immunity from execution must be express, within the meaning of customary international law, of which the United Nations Convention on Jurisdictional Immunity of States and their Property of December 2, 2004 forms part. applicable in OHADA law, for legal reasons. This condition of validity of the waiver poses the problem of the effectiveness of contracts subject to the mandatory rules of public law or arbitration agreements and regulations. So, should we consider rewriting the usual models of arbitration agreements and rules to include this condition ? This approach would guarantee the effectiveness of administrative arbitration awards, based on the binding force of contracts (pacta sunt servenda) and their performance in good faith. Also, this waiver could be reinforced by the mention of property assigned to the activity in question or to the execution of the award which will ensue unrelated to the activity which gave rise to it. In any event, immunity from execution does not preclude either the identification of the debtors of the pecuniary judgments of public persons, nor the exequatur of administrative arbitration awards, nor even the voluntary or spontaneous execution of the said sentences. T hus, despite its absolute or strict design, OHADA immunity from execution has limits with respect to administrative arbitral awards
Daneshvar, Fatemeh. „L’immunité juridictionnelle des États et des organismes d'État“. Thesis, Université de Lorraine, 2018. http://www.theses.fr/2018LORR0270.
The issue of jurisdictional immunity of states was for centuries an undisputed matter based on the principle of state equality and absolute independence of states. The rules were developed at a time when it was thought to be an infringement of a state's sovereignty to bring proceedings against it or its officials in a foreign country. However, the functions of states have changed over the centuries and nowadays states are involved in commercial activities as a private person and accordingly play an essential role in the commercial activities of the world. In fact, the issue of state immunities is an increasingly important and rapidly developing area of international law and practice. The state practice reflects the emerging global consensus that States and State enterprises can no longer claim absolute, unrestrained immunity from the proper jurisdiction of foreign courts, especially for their commercial activities. Therefore, although the law of state immunity is related to the grant of immunities to states to enable them to carry out their public functions effectively, modern international law does not require the courts of one state to refrain from deciding a case merely because a foreign state is an unwilling defendant. It is therefore important to know how a plea of state immunity may be made and to what type of dispute it applies
Bücher zum Thema "Renonciation à l’immunité d’exécution":
William A, Schabas. Part 9 International Cooperation and Judicial Assistance: Coopération Internationale Et Assistance Judiciaire, Art.98 Cooperation with respect to waiver of immunity and consent to surrender/Coopération en relation avec la renonciation à l’immunité et le consentement à la remise. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198739777.003.0103.
Buchteile zum Thema "Renonciation à l’immunité d’exécution":
„6 La renonciation par un État à son immunité d’exécution“. In Immunities in the Age of Global Constitutionalism, 70–84. Brill | Nijhoff, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004251632_007.
„19. L’immunité d’exécution des comptes bancaires des missions diplomatiques et consulaires“. In Unité et diversité du droit international/Unity and Diversity of International Law, 447–75. Brill | Nijhoff, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/9789004262393_020.