Einloggen

Thematische Bibliographien / Responsible research and innovation / Zeitschriftenartikel

Um die anderen Arten von Veröffentlichungen zu diesem Thema anzuzeigen, folgen Sie diesem Link: Responsible research and innovation.

Zeitschriftenartikel zum Thema „Responsible research and innovation“

Autor: Grafiati

Veröffentlicht am 4. Juni 2021

Zuletzt aktualisiert am 1. Februar 2022

Geben Sie eine Quelle nach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard und anderen Zitierweisen an

Wählen Sie eine Art der Quelle aus:

Machen Sie sich mit Top-50 Zeitschriftenartikel für die Forschung zum Thema "Responsible research and innovation" bekannt.

Neben jedem Werk im Literaturverzeichnis ist die Option "Zur Bibliographie hinzufügen" verfügbar. Nutzen Sie sie, wird Ihre bibliographische Angabe des gewählten Werkes nach der nötigen Zitierweise (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver usw.) automatisch gestaltet.

Sie können auch den vollen Text der wissenschaftlichen Publikation im PDF-Format herunterladen und eine Online-Annotation der Arbeit lesen, wenn die relevanten Parameter in den Metadaten verfügbar sind.

Sehen Sie die Zeitschriftenartikel für verschiedene Spezialgebieten durch und erstellen Sie Ihre Bibliographie auf korrekte Weise.

1

de Saille, Stevienna. „Innovating innovation policy: the emergence of ‘Responsible Research and Innovation’“. Journal of Responsible Innovation 2, Nr. 2 (04.05.2015): 152–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2015.1045280.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

2

Jakobsen, Stig-Erik, Arnt Fløysand und John Overton. „Expanding the field of Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) – from responsible research to responsible innovation“. European Planning Studies 27, Nr. 12 (19.09.2019): 2329–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2019.1667617.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

3

Sudolska, Lis und Chodorek. „Research Profiling for Responsible and Sustainable Innovations“. Sustainability 11, Nr. 23 (20.11.2019): 6553. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su11236553.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

The issues of responsible and sustainable innovations have been attracting the growing attention of the ranks of scholars in recent years. However, this amassing productivity in the field has not been mapped and profiled thoroughly, yet. Therefore, the aim of the paper is to map the research output related to the concepts of responsible and sustainable innovations with the method of research profiling. The analysis consists of three components: general research profiling, subject area profiling and topic profiling conducted with the use of Scopus database. The research process is directed at answering three research questions: (1) who are the main contributors within the scholarly community? why? so what? (2) how is the research output distributed among subject areas? why? so what? (3) what are the central topics and issues discussed within the research field? why? so what? First of all, key contributing countries, research institutions, journals, and authors are identified in order to characterize the scholarly community working in the field. Secondly, research output is profiled through the prism of respective subject areas. This type of profiling aims at discovering varieties among key journals, authors and core references distributed across various subject areas. Thirdly, topic analysis is conducted in order to point out most crucial aspects studied in the body of literature in the field. The research sample consists of 1,083 publications indexed in Scopus database, including the phrases ‘responsible innovation’ or ‘sustainable innovation’ within their titles, keywords, and abstracts (topic search). The findings from the general research profiling confirm the growing interest of academia in exploring and investigating the issues of responsible and sustainable innovations. The leading contributors in the field are scholars and research institutions from the Netherlands, the United Kingdom, and the United States. Dutch universities and research centers occupy three top three positions in regard to the number of publications. Among them, Delft University of Technology is the unquestionable leader. Journal of Cleaner Production and Journal of Responsible Innovation are found to be the most prolific and highly recognized source titles in the field. Subject area profiling shows a relatively high level of interrelatedness among the four leading subject areas i.e., Business, Management and Accounting, Engineering, Social Sciences, and Environmental Science in regard to authors, source titles and core references. Topic profiling indicates two leading thematic streams in the research field focused on the features and core aspects of responsible and sustainable innovations, and the relationships of the concept with people (human, humans), research, ethics, and technology. Discussion of research findings is focused around comparing and contrasting three overlapping concepts (i.e., responsible research and innovation, responsible innovation, and sustainable innovation), providing the critical assessment of the reasons for the scholarly research to have developed along with certain patterns and identifying unexplored aspects or possible future avenues of research.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

4

Turk, Žiga. „Responsible Research and Innovation in Construction“. Procedia Engineering 164 (2016): 461–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2016.11.645.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

5

Tait, Joyce. „From responsible research to responsible innovation: challenges in implementation“. Engineering Biology 1, Nr. 1 (18.05.2017): 7–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1049/enb.2017.0010.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

6

Flipse, S. M., K. H. Van Dam, J. Stragier, T. J. C. Oude Vrielink und M. C. A. Van der Sanden. „Operationalizing responsible research & innovation in industry through decision support in innovation practice“. Journal on Chain and Network Science 15, Nr. 2 (07.12.2015): 135–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.3920/jcns2015.x004.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

This paper presents a tool that can help innovators to operationalize responsible research & innovation (RRI) in industry and offers decision support in their innovation project management. This tool is based on an earlier method of project quality assessment to identify innovative project success-related key performance indicators (KPIs). Based on real-world data and using structural equation modelling, a model is developed that relates the KPIs to one another and provides innovators with the opportunity to compare quality scores of current projects to a database of earlier successful and less successful project quality assessments. Building on this model, using a rapid prototyping approach based simulation and modelling, a scenario development tool has been developed that can predict success chances of current projects based on changing KPI score parameters. By highlighting the value of the KPIs in relation to RRI, and by elucidating what could be done to increase values of low scoring project KPIs, innovators who use the tool can evaluate possible actions they can deploy to increase the quality of their innovative projects, while simultaneously innovating in a more socially responsible way.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

7

Bolz, Karsten, und Anne de Bruin. „Responsible innovation and social innovation: toward an integrative research framework“. International Journal of Social Economics 46, Nr. 6 (10.06.2019): 742–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ijse-10-2018-0517.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

PurposeResponsible innovation (RI) and social innovation (SI) are two fields of innovation study experiencing burgeoning policy, practice and research interest. Despite this rapid rise in popularity, the scholarly literature in these two related areas of innovation study remains quite separate, stymieing the growth of shared research insights. The purpose of this paper is to propose a pragmatic, process-based framework that lends itself to advancing systematic research in both fields while retaining their distinct identities.Design/methodology/approachThis conceptual paper outlines an analogy-inspired framework that builds on the logical thinking put forward by Philosopher Willard Van Orman Quine in 1962. It focusses on key processes that cross-cut both fields.FindingsReflexivity, collaboration and design are identified as three broad core processes that span both the RI and SI fields and form the basis of an integrative framework that highlights the scope for cross-field research pollination.Originality/valueThe literature that draws these two fields together is virtually non-existent. The paper uses analogy to facilitate awareness of the parallels between these two areas of innovation study. The integrative framework put forward in the paper is of value for advancing cumulative research in innovation fields of critical importance to the society.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

8

Stahl, Bernd Carsten. „Responsible research and innovation in information systems“. European Journal of Information Systems 21, Nr. 3 (Mai 2012): 207–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/ejis.2012.19.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

9

Yaghmaei, Emad. „Addressing responsible research and innovation to industry“. ACM SIGCAS Computers and Society 45, Nr. 3 (05.01.2016): 294–300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/2874239.2874282.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

10

Wiwanitkit, Somsri, und Viroj Wiwanitkit. „“Broader Impacts” or “Responsible Research and Innovation”?“ Science and Engineering Ethics 20, Nr. 4 (07.12.2013): 1149–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11948-013-9501-0.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

11

Cao, Xia, Dan Lv und Zeyu Xing. „Innovative Resources, Promotion Focus and Responsible Innovation: The Moderating Roles of Adaptive Governance“. Sustainability 12, Nr. 7 (03.04.2020): 2860. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su12072860.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

This paper discusses the relationship between innovative resources, promotion focus, adaptive governance and responsible innovation. In accordance with the path of “demand—motivation—behavior”, this paper takes adaptive governance as the moderator, and constructs an influence relationship model of “innovative resources—promotion focus (adaptive governance)—responsible innovation”. Then this paper takes 361 managers from above the middle management level and the technical personnel of enterprises as the investigation objects, and conducts empirical research by using the structural equation model. The results show that: (1) innovative resources have a significant positive impact on responsible innovation; (2) promotion focus partially mediates the effect of innovative resources on responsible innovation; (3) adaptive governance has a positive moderating effect on the relationship between innovative resources and responsible innovation. The results enrich the quantitative research of responsible innovation, reveal the internal mechanism of innovative resources affecting responsible innovation, provide a new way for technological innovation governance and provide a new way of thinking for the transformation from the traditional innovation paradigm into a sustainable innovation paradigm.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

12

Fitjar, Rune Dahl, Paul Benneworth und Bjørn Terje Asheim. „Towards regional responsible research and innovation? Integrating RRI and RIS3 in European innovation policy“. Science and Public Policy 46, Nr. 5 (18.05.2019): 772–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scz029.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

Abstract This article develops a model for a regional responsible research and innovation (RRI) policy, integrating existing European Union policies on RRI, and on research and innovation strategies for smart specialisation (RIS3). RRI and RIS3 are central concepts in the EU’s innovation policy agenda, but there are tensions between the two approaches. The place-based approach inherent in RIS3 is missing from RRI, which has a fuzzy concept of geographical scale and is vulnerable to mismatches between the scale of innovations and of the associated governance networks involved in the innovation process. Meanwhile, the multitude of visions, values and stakeholder perceptions embodied in the RRI concept is countered by the more optimistic and unitary imagining of a regional future in RIS3. We highlight that Europe’s innovation challenges can only be resolved by leveraging the strengths of both types of innovation policy.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

13

Reale, Emanuela. „Responsible Research and Innovation: implications for research evaluation at universities“. WELFARE E ERGONOMIA, Nr. 1 (Februar 2020): 55–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.3280/we2019-001006.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

14

Mamidipudi, Annapurna, und Nina Frahm. „Turning Straw to Gold: Mobilising Symmetry in Responsible Research and Innovation“. Science, Technology and Society 25, Nr. 2 (07.03.2020): 223–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0971721820902964.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

This article aims to reflect on the role of Science, Technology and Society (STS) research(ers) in co-constructing Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) in the Global South. By reporting on RRI research in the Global South, here the Indo-Dutch NWO-MVI project on rice straw burning in Punjab, we make an argument for approaching RRI as a symmetric process of knowledge production mobilised by local actors and researchers alike. For STS researchers to responsibly engage with local innovation systems, their activities need to go beyond knowledge provision and towards facilitating the ownership and circulation of local meanings and means to responsibly innovate. Rather than understanding RRI as a fixed framework to govern innovation practices, this article reflects on RRI as an approach that combines research with intervention. We propose that following the principle of symmetry can turn RRI into a productive tool for the mobilisation of embedded local principles that can organise innovation systems in a responsible way. In particular, symmetry allows the re-location of meanings and practices of innovation as well as the re-negotiation of multiple notions of responsible governance.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

15

Nazarko, Lukasz, und Borisas Melnikas. „Operationalising Responsible Research and Innovation – tools for enterprises“. Engineering Management in Production and Services 11, Nr. 3 (19.11.2019): 21–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/emj-2019-0017.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

Abstract Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) is an emerging paradigm and a novel approach to governing science and innovation with the aim of making them ethically acceptable and socially desirable. RRI concept has become a popular term as a result of making it a cross-cutting theme for the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme. Up to date, research on the topic has focused on conceptual problems (relation with similar concepts as well as ethical, moral, philosophical, cultural underpinnings and assumptions) and on the possibilities of making the concept relevant to the Research & Innovation community in Europe and worldwide. Despite some initial efforts, there is still a need to further develop methods and techniques that could make RRI a useful framework for conducting innovation activities, especially in the business environment. The aim of this paper is to propose a range of approaches that help operationalise RRI. The approaches employ methods such as weighted indicators, maturity models and scorecards.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

16

Khodzhaeva, Antonina, Martin Sand, Maria Maia, S. Woll, G. Velloso und Daniel Frank. „Responsible Research and Innovation & Perspectives and Challenges“. TATuP - Zeitschrift für Technikfolgenabschätzung in Theorie und Praxis 24, Nr. 1 (01.04.2015): 111–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.14512/tatup.24.1.111.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

17

Stemerding, Dirk. „iGEM as laboratory in responsible research and innovation“. Journal of Responsible Innovation 2, Nr. 1 (02.01.2015): 140–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2014.1002171.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

18

Grunwald, Armin. „The hermeneutic side of responsible research and innovation“. Journal of Responsible Innovation 1, Nr. 3 (02.09.2014): 274–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2014.968437.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

19

Jirotka, Marina, Barbara Grimpe, Bernd Stahl, Grace Eden und Mark Hartswood. „Responsible research and innovation in the digital age“. Communications of the ACM 60, Nr. 5 (24.04.2017): 62–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1145/3064940.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

20

Coenen, Christopher, und Armin Grunwald. „Responsible research and innovation (RRI) in quantum technology“. Ethics and Information Technology 19, Nr. 4 (17.08.2017): 277–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10676-017-9432-6.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

21

Mejlgaard, Niels, Malene Vinther Christensen, Roger Strand, Ivan Buljan, Mar Carrió, Marta Cayetano i Giralt, Erich Griessler et al. „Teaching Responsible Research and Innovation: A Phronetic Perspective“. Science and Engineering Ethics 25, Nr. 2 (07.02.2018): 597–615. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11948-018-0029-1.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

22

Schuijff, Mirjam, und Anne M. Dijkstra. „Practices of Responsible Research and Innovation: A Review“. Science and Engineering Ethics 26, Nr. 2 (16.12.2019): 533–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11948-019-00167-3.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

23

Coenen, Christopher. „Broadening Discourse on Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI)“. NanoEthics 10, Nr. 1 (09.03.2016): 1–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11569-016-0255-4.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

24

Scholten, Victor, Jeroen van den Hoven, Eefje Cuppen und Steven Flipse. „Science communication and Responsible Research and Innovation. How can they complement each other?“ Journal of Science Communication 15, Nr. 06 (16.12.2016): C04. http://dx.doi.org/10.22323/2.15060304.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

In today's society a variety of challenges need attention because they are considered to affect our well-being. Many of these challenges can be addressed with new innovations, yet they may also introduce new challenges. Communication of these new innovations is vital. This importance is also addressed by the concept of Responsible Research and Innovation. In the present commentary we draw on a dataset of 196 research projects and discuss the two research streams of Science Communication and Responsible Research and Innovation and how they are complements to each other. We conclude with suggestions for practitioners and scientists.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

25

Nazarko, Lukasz. „RESPONSIBLE RESEARCH AND INNOVATION – A CONCEPTUAL CONTRIBUTION TO THEORY AND PRACTICE OF TECHNOLOGY MANAGEMENT“. Business: Theory and Practice 20 (29.08.2019): 342–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.3846/btp.2019.32.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

The concept of Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) has become a popular term as a result of making it a cross-cutting theme for the Horizon 2020 Framework Programme of the European Union. RRI may be understood as a process by which societal actors and innovators become mutually responsive to each other with a view to the acceptability, sustainability and societal desirability of the innovation process and its products. The work presents a review of the state-of-art scientific literature on Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) together with a synthesis of theoretical and practical challenges faced by this new concept. Mapping of RRI dimensions and its theoretical assumptions is performed. Bibliometric analysis of the scientific literature on RRI is carried out. The analysis of RRI-related projects is conducted. The attempt is made to clarify what RRI means for an enterprise in practical terms and what makes an innovation project in an enterprise a responsible one. Finally, a proposal for a closer interchange between RRI and Technology Assessment discourses is made together with an argument for a more extensive use of future-oriented methods that increase epistemic horizons of an innovating organisation.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

26

Gremmen, Bart, Vincent Blok und Bernice Bovenkerk. „Responsible Innovation for Life: Five Challenges Agriculture Offers for Responsible Innovation in Agriculture and Food, and the Necessity of an Ethics of Innovation“. Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics 32, Nr. 5-6 (18.10.2019): 673–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10806-019-09808-w.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

Abstract In this special issue we will investigate, from the perspective of agricultural ethics (e.g. animal welfare, agricultural and food ethics, environmental ethics etc.) the potential to develop a Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) approach to agriculture, and the limitations to such an enterprise. RRI is an emerging field in the European research and innovation (R&I) policy context that aims to balance economic, socio-cultural and environmental aspects in innovation processes. Because technological innovations can contribute significantly to the solution of societal challenges like climate change or food security, but can also have negative societal consequences, it is assumed that social and ethical aspects should be considered during the R&I process. For this reason, the emerging concept of RRI calls for ethical reflection on the nature, scope and applicability of responsibility and innovation in innovation practices in general, and the way social–ethical issues can be applied and addressed in agriculture.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

27

de Jong, Irja Marije, Frank Kupper, Marlous Arentshorst und Jacqueline Broerse. „Responsible Reporting: Neuroimaging News in the Age of Responsible Research and Innovation“. Science and Engineering Ethics 22, Nr. 4 (25.07.2015): 1107–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11948-015-9684-7.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

28

Nazarko, Lukasz. „Responsible Research and Innovation in Enterprises: Benefits, Barriers and the Problem of Assessment“. Journal of Open Innovation: Technology, Market, and Complexity 6, Nr. 1 (06.02.2020): 12. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/joitmc6010012.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

In the paper, the author takes stock of the conceptual reflection and empirical studies described in the current scientific literature on responsible innovation in the context of the emergence of the Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) concept. RRI has been promoted in the European Union as a part of the Europe 2020 strategy with the objective of making research and innovation more sustainable and inclusive. As more than half of the EU’s firms declare they are conducting innovation activities, RRI problems are more relevant than ever. There remain many open questions, unresolved dilemmas and empirical white spots that call for more research in this field. This paper’s focus is the problem of RRI acceptance as a global framework for responsible innovation and the scarcity of suitable instruments that may help industries understand and adopt this concept. The main contributions of this paper include critical analysis of the RRI concept and its implications for industry, proposing a concept of an RRI index for innovating enterprises.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

29

Deblonde, Marian. „Responsible research and innovation: building knowledge arenas for glocal sustainability research“. Journal of Responsible Innovation 2, Nr. 1 (02.01.2015): 20–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2014.1001235.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

30

Bedsted, Bjørn, Lise Bitsch, Lars Klüver, Rasmus Øjvind Nielsen und Marie Louise Margrethe Jørgensen. „Towards an inclusive European innovation policy“. Journal of Science Communication 17, Nr. 03 (03.09.2018): C03. http://dx.doi.org/10.22323/2.17030303.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

With “Horizon Europe”, the European Commission sets out the framework for research and innovation in Europe over the next seven years. The proposal outlines the contours of an innovative science policy that is open and responsive to societal needs, and where societal actors jointly undertake missions to discover sustainable solutions to present-day and future challenges. In our commentary we point to a number of modifications needed to strengthen the cross-cutting implementation of activities for societal engagement and responsible research and innovation.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

31

Alexei, Grinbaum. „Ethics in the Framework of Responsible Research and Innovation“. BULLETIN OF PNRPU CULTURE. HISTORY. PHILOSOPHY. LAW, Nr. 2 (2019): 21–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.15593/perm.kipf/2019.2.02.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

32

Wodzisz, Rafał. „Conceptual Investigation Within Area of Responsible Research and Innovation“. Zagadnienia Naukoznawstwa 55, Nr. 1(219) (08.10.2020): 11. http://dx.doi.org/10.12775/zn.2019.001.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

33

Stahl, Bernd Carsten, und Mark Coeckelbergh. „Ethics of healthcare robotics: Towards responsible research and innovation“. Robotics and Autonomous Systems 86 (Dezember 2016): 152–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.robot.2016.08.018.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

34

Antiel, Ryan M., und Alan W. Flake. „Responsible surgical innovation and research in maternal–fetal surgery“. Seminars in Fetal and Neonatal Medicine 22, Nr. 6 (Dezember 2017): 423–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.siny.2017.05.002.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

35

Wiederhold, Brenda K. „Sustainable Responsible Research and Innovation Through Secure, Private Data“. Cyberpsychology, Behavior, and Social Networking 18, Nr. 1 (Januar 2015): 1–2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1089/cyber.2014.1529.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

36

Ogoh, George Inyila, und N. Ben Fairweather. „The state of the responsible research and innovation programme“. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 17, Nr. 2 (13.05.2019): 145–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jices-12-2018-0093.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

Purpose Many of the ethical issues of additive manufacturing (AM) are not well known or understood, and there remains a policy vacuum that needs to be addressed. This paper aims to describe an approach that has been applied successfully to other emerging technologies, referred to as the responsible research and innovation (RRI) framework programme. A case is then made for the application of this approach in the AM industry with an illustration of how it might be used. Design/methodology/approach The research uses an RRI approach referred to as AREA, an acronym for Anticipate, Reflect, Engage and Act, to assess the ethical implications of AM. For the anticipation phase, horizon scanning was done to explore the ethical issues of AM based on extant literature, while reflective analysis was carried out all through the work to reflect on the data being collected and the research process. The engage phase involved interviews with five participants from small- and medium-sized enterprises (SMEs) involved in 3D printing. Findings The findings indicate that although AM appears to pose a threat to intellectual property rights, many in the industry do not care about this issue. As AM becomes mainstream, intellectual property will likely become a big problem. Also, very little is known about the health impacts of AM. This study shows that AM can be hazardous. Research limitations/implications Only users at SME level were sampled. Other researchers might test the usefulness of AREA at the enterprise level. Practical implications The research demonstrates how the AREA framework may be useful in information systems and social science research by enabling a more anticipatory and reflective research process. Originality/value The paper responds to the need for a novel approach to identifying ethical issues of AM.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

37

Yang, Panpan, und Bing Han. „Responsible Research and Innovation and Its Implications for China“. China & World Economy 25, Nr. 6 (November 2017): 120–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/cwe.12224.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

38

Gardner, John, und Clare Williams. „Responsible research and innovation: A manifesto for empirical ethics?“ Clinical Ethics 10, Nr. 1-2 (19.01.2015): 5–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1477750914567840.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

39

Wender, Ben A., Rider W. Foley, Troy A. Hottle, Jathan Sadowski, Valentina Prado-Lopez, Daniel A. Eisenberg, Lise Laurin und Thomas P. Seager. „Anticipatory life-cycle assessment for responsible research and innovation“. Journal of Responsible Innovation 1, Nr. 2 (04.05.2014): 200–207. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2014.920121.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

40

Fraaije, Aafke, und Steven M. Flipse. „Synthesizing an implementation framework for responsible research and innovation“. Journal of Responsible Innovation 7, Nr. 1 (21.11.2019): 113–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2019.1676685.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

41

Silva, Cristina L. M., Rui Costa und Paola Pittia. „Responsible research and innovation in the food value chain“. Journal of Food Engineering 213 (November 2017): 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jfoodeng.2017.07.018.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

42

Lingner, Stephan, und John Weckert. „Nanoscale-Technologies as Subjects of Responsible Research and Innovation“. NanoEthics 10, Nr. 2 (30.06.2016): 173–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11569-016-0269-y.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

43

Yaghmaei, Emad. „Responsible research and innovation key performance indicators in industry“. Journal of Information, Communication and Ethics in Society 16, Nr. 2 (01.05.2018): 214–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/jices-11-2017-0066.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

Purpose Responsible research and innovation (RRI) is taking a role in assisting all types of stakeholders, including industry members, in moving their research and innovation (R&I) initiatives to tackle grand challenges. The literature on RRI, however, focuses little on how industry can implement RRI principles. To solve this gap, the purpose of this study is to construct a conceptual framework for managing and assessing RRI principles in the industry. Design/methodology/approach Qualitative research was used to build the RRI key performance indicator list; 30 interviews were conducted to design a framework which was pilot tested in a company to identify how to align technology outcomes to the values, needs and expectations of the society. Findings This study depicts five successive RRI implementation levels and exhibits RRI key performance indicators. Drawing on extant models, this study develops RRI levels and indicators to discuss why industry should become engaged in RRI, how it can embed RRI principles into R&I processes and how RRI indicators can be managed systematically. Originality/value The connection between RRI key performance indicators and RRI levels determines how industry can integrate principles and methodologies of RRI into R&I processes. The model in the study shows how companies move from one RRI stage to another and this study aims to exhibit an ideal stage of RRI for industry.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

44

Jiya, Tilimbe. „Responsible Data Governance in Projects: Applying a Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) Framework“. Journal of technology management & innovation 16, Nr. 1 (2021): 31–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.4067/s0718-27242021000100031.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

45

Owen, Richard, Mario Pansera, Phil Macnaghten und Sally Randles. „Organisational institutionalisation of responsible innovation“. Research Policy 50, Nr. 1 (Januar 2021): 104132. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.respol.2020.104132.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

46

Paredes-Frigolett, Harold. „Modeling the effect of responsible research and innovation in quadruple helix innovation systems“. Technological Forecasting and Social Change 110 (September 2016): 126–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2015.11.001.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

47

Demers-Payette, Olivier, Pascale Lehoux und Geneviève Daudelin. „Responsible research and innovation: a productive model for the future of medical innovation“. Journal of Responsible Innovation 3, Nr. 3 (September 2016): 188–208. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23299460.2016.1256659.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

48

Fløysand, Arnt, Emil Tomson Lindfors, Stig-Erik Jakobsen und Lars Coenen. „Place-Based Directionality of Innovation: Tasmanian Salmon Farming and Responsible Innovation“. Sustainability 13, Nr. 1 (23.12.2020): 62. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su13010062.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

The aim of this paper has been to explore, in depth, the place-based conditions enabling and constraining the directionality of responsible innovation in the Tasmanian salmon farming industry, and to discuss how this case can inform the broader literature on directionality of innovations. Theoretically, we argue that the combination of literature on responsible research and innovation (RRI), regional innovation system (RIS) and discourse theory is a useful starting point for addressing innovation as a territorial complex consisting of a material dimension in terms of technologies and resources, an organizational dimension in terms of innovation systems and regulations, and a discursive dimension in terms of narratives in play. When applying the complex to analyze how place-based conditions have enabled and constrained the directionality of responsible innovation in the Tasmanian salmon industry, the case discerns that the directionality of responsible innovation arises from a rather mature and well-organized regional innovation system, which allows multiple stakeholders to articulate their narratives. Under such circumstances, responsible innovation becomes a multidimensional, interactive, and co-created phenomenon consisting of several dilemmas. Still, although the contextualization of responsible innovation is highlighted, our case study acknowledges that certain “universal” characteristics shine through. By this we mean that context sensitivity must not supersede the fact that place-based responsible innovation is always subject to some generic dynamism: under all circumstances there will be a territorial innovation complex at play.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

49

O’Sullivan, Siobhán. „Models of Governance for Innovation in Medicine and Health Research“. European Journal of Health Law 27, Nr. 3 (15.06.2020): 324–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15718093-bja10022.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

Abstract Personalised medicine, digital innovations, and neuro-technologies all offer significant potential benefit for human health and welfare, but also raise complex governance challenges. A variety of approaches have been adopted in the governance of innovative medicines and health technologies, including risk assessment, ethics and self-governance. Recently anticipatory or ‘upstream’ modes of governance have garnered favour. Anticipatory regulation demands a closer relationship between regulators and innovators, to shape the trajectories of the technology. In the EU context, responsible research and innovation has emerged as a key mechanism of governance. This is linked but distinct from a human rights governance which has the advantage of exerting both legal and moral force. What is needed in the healthcare context are governance models which ensure human rights considerations are taken into account from the earliest stages of innovation, to maximise the likelihood that developments are from the outset beneficial and oriented towards protecting ethical values.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

50

Das, Anup Kumar. „Research Integrity in the Context of Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI) Framework“. DESIDOC Journal of Library & Information Technology 39, Nr. 2 (11.03.2019): 82–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.14429/djlit.39.2.13892.

Der volle Inhalt der Quelle

Annotation:

In April 2017 the Research and Information System for Developing Countries (RIS), in collaboration with the Department of Science and Technology, Government of India, organized a national consultation on Responsible Research and Innovation (RRI). Five key issues aligning in the RRI framework were discussed in the meeting, which are namely public engagement, open access, gender equality, science education, and ethics. As pointed out by the expert panelists, the aspects of ethics in research and academia include the research integrity, minimization of research misconduct and plagiarism, besides a few others. Recently launched “RRI-Practice Report from National Case Study: India”, extensively analyzed the public policy instruments facilitating the governance of responsible research in India. The fundamental tenets of responsibility in research and innovation are to be based on the ideas of Access, Equity, and Inclusion (AEI), as identified by the said country case study. On the other hand, the idea of Scientific Social Responsibility (SSR) was advocated by the Prime Minister of India in lines with the Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) during the 104th Indian Science Congress, 2017. RRI framework addresses many of the critical issues related to SSR. This paper explores the opportunities and challenges in the RRI Framework while ensuring the research integrity in India. This paper includes the highlights from the INSA Policy Statement on "Dissemination and Evaluation of Research Output in India" (2018), UGC (Promotion of Academic Integrity and Prevention of Plagiarism in Higher Educational Institutions) Regulations (2018), and RRI-Practice’s “Report from National Case Study: India” (2018).

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO und andere Zitierweisen

Wir bieten Rabatte auf alle Premium-Pläne für Autoren, deren Werke in thematische Literatursammlungen aufgenommen wurden. Kontaktieren Sie uns, um einen einzigartigen Promo-Code zu erhalten!