Literatura académica sobre el tema "Unilateral administrative"
Crea una cita precisa en los estilos APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard y otros
Consulte las listas temáticas de artículos, libros, tesis, actas de conferencias y otras fuentes académicas sobre el tema "Unilateral administrative".
Junto a cada fuente en la lista de referencias hay un botón "Agregar a la bibliografía". Pulsa este botón, y generaremos automáticamente la referencia bibliográfica para la obra elegida en el estilo de cita que necesites: APA, MLA, Harvard, Vancouver, Chicago, etc.
También puede descargar el texto completo de la publicación académica en formato pdf y leer en línea su resumen siempre que esté disponible en los metadatos.
Artículos de revistas sobre el tema "Unilateral administrative"
1
Kadečka, Stanislav, David Hejč, Klára Prokopová, and Jiří Venclíček. "Dispositional Instruments of Protection against Administrative Acts (not in Legal Force) and their Effectiveness." Central European Public Administration Review 12, no. 2-3 (2014): 99–122. http://dx.doi.org/10.17573/ipar.2014.2-3.a06.
Texto completoResumen
Public administration is often implemented through the issuing of public acts of a unilateral and binding character. Within public administration, however, legal instruments by which those for whom the administrative acts are binding can defend themselves against any illegality or irregularity of the mentioned administrative acts, are also (must be) provided. The existence and proper effectiveness of these legal instruments can be regarded as a necessary part (sine qua non) of the democratic rule of law. The paper is concerned with the so-called dispositional legal instruments of protection against the administrative acts which are not yet in legal force and their effectiveness. Article's major finding consists in fact, that the effectiveness of dispositional instruments of protection could be limited by absence of devolutive effect, or guarantee of independence in organizational arrangement between first and second instance administrative bodies.
2
WATERMAN, RICHARD W. "The Administrative Presidency, Unilateral Power, and the Unitary Executive Theory." Presidential Studies Quarterly 39, no. 1 (2009): 5–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-5705.2008.03654.x.
Texto completo
3
Drakokhrust, T. V. "MECHANISM OF ADMINISTRATIVE AND LEGAL SUPPORT OF UKRAINE'S MIGRATION POLICY." Actual problems of native jurisprudence, no. 06 (March 2, 2020): 63–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.15421/391995.
Texto completoResumen
The article deals with the concepts and features of interpretation of the mechanism of administrative and legal support of the migration policy of Ukraine. The author analyzes the elements of the mechanism of administrative and legal regulation as a whole. Various straight burners are also analyzed, which are encapsulated in the applicable nominative act. Based on the above statements, the author concludes that the mechanism of administrative and legal support of Ukraine’s migration policy includes specific elements, namely the system of normative legal acts, which is the basis for the functioning of this mechanism; organizational and structural formation; the organizational and legal methods and methods that ensure the functioning of this mechanism. The author has outlined that the first element of the mechanism of administrative and legal support of migration policy of Ukraine, today constitutes the system of legal acts, which is the legal basis of migration policy of Ukraine. Regarding the second element of the mechanism of administrative and legal support of migration policy of Ukraine, the author emphasizes that there are still many shortcomings in the activities of the State Migration Service of Ukraine. Concerning the third element of the mechanism of administrative and legal support of the migration policy of Ukraine, the author noted that it is generally recognized in the administrative science that the method and methods are interrelated parties to the process of public administration. The author has concluded that it is expedient to outline a conceptual approach to understanding the essence of administrative and legal methods and ways of implementing migration policy in Ukraine. The problem of public administration methods is now extremely urgent. This is largely due to the active efforts to accelerate the transition to civilized market-type relations and the changes that are taking place in this regard in the mechanism of public administration. Accordingly, public administration is designed mainly for such public relations, in which the legal equality of their participants is excluded, that is, the imperative method (the method of power orders) prevails here. The consequence of this is that public administration involves the unilateral expression of the will of one of the participants in the relationship.
4
Abadi, Mohammad Reza Momen, and Mohammadreza Sharafatpeima. "Private expropriation against the public interest in Iran." Ciência e Natura 37 (December 21, 2015): 336. http://dx.doi.org/10.5902/2179460x20864.
Texto completoResumen
Private ownership is the fundamental rights of individuals in the society and having high jurisprudence and legal support. However, in contrast to public interest, administrative agencies can apply to withdraw the property, although there are evidences for the arbitrariness of the legal nature of administrative agencies. It seems that the unilateral obligation of this action is preferred. Expropriation is in contrary to the principles, therefore for health acquisition, the ceremony which is prescribed by lawyer that non-compliance will invalidate the ownership.
5
Merkulov, V. G. "Administrative prevention measures: theoretical approaches to the concept and classification." Courier of Kutafin Moscow State Law University (MSAL)), no. 6 (September 25, 2021): 63–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.17803/2311-5998.2021.82.6.063-070.
Texto completoResumen
The article analyzes various opinions of administrative scientists regarding the concept of administrative preventive measures, their classification. Specific compulsory measures of administrative warning applied to minors are given. The author gives examples of the classification of administrative and preventive measures, revealing their main and distinctive features. Depending on the purpose of coercion, the author identifies two groups of administrative prevention measures: 1) measures applied in the event of a threat to public safety and personal safety to prevent possible harm, and 2) measures applied in relation to persons who have committed a wrongful act in order to prevent them from committing new offenses.In conclusion of the article, the author defines as the main feature of administrative coercion measures the coercive nature of this group of measures, consisting in the implementation of imperious and unilateral actions that are not agreed with the opposite party who is obliged to fulfill the order, perform the actions necessary in this situation, or refrain from committing them.
6
Spahiu, Artan. "Public Interest Opposite the Freedom of Contractual Will in Administrative Contracts in the Republic of Albania." Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 6, s2 (2017): 37–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/ajis-2018-0026.
Texto completoResumen
Abstract The protection of the public interest is the main principle governing the activity regulation of the administrative bodies. This activity, traditionally, has been developed through administrative acts, as an expression of the unilateral and authoritarian willpower of public authority, which creates legal consequences. The administrative act has been and remains the most important instrument for the administration bodies to accomplish their mission, but it is no longer effective. Particularly this lack of efficiency is noticed in recent years when the development of the economy and the needs of the evergrowing society have prompted the administration to adapt its activity by making use of other mechanisms “borrowed” from private law. An important part of public activity can also be achieved through the contract as a way that brings the state closer to the private, mitigating its dominant position and leaving space for the efficiency of private activity to fulfil public engagements. Such contracts today are known as “administrative contracts” or “public contracts”. The terms mentioned above are instruments that establish legal relations, for the regulation of which the principle of public interest is opposed and competes with the principle of freedom of the contractual willpower. The regulation of these types of contracts is reached through the private law, which constitutes the general normative framework of contracts (lex generalis) even for the administrative contracts. But this general arrangement will have effect for as long as it does not contradict the imperative provisions of the specific act of public law (lex specialis), which regulates the administrative procedure for the completion of these contracts. This paper aims to bring to the spotlight the way our legislation predict and regulates administrative contracts, by emphasising particularly the features of their dualistic nature. The coexistence and competition of the principles of the freedom of contractual willpower and the protection of the public interest, evidenced in administrative contracts, is presented in this paper through the legal analysis of the Albanian legal framework which regulates these contracts. Under the terms when the role of the state in providing public services tends to increase and our legislation aims the harmonization in accord with the European legislation, it is necessary to improve the administrative contract regulation and extend its scope of action.
7
Muzakkir, Nurul, Yanis Rinaldi, and Adwani Adwani. "Cancellation of Land Ownership Certificate by the State Administrative Court Reviewed from the State Administrative Justice Law." International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding 8, no. 4 (2021): 703. http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v8i4.2624.
Texto completoResumen
Based on Article 32 paragraph (2) of Government Regulation No. 24 of 1997 concerning Land Registration states, in the event that a land area has been issued a certificate legally and on behalf of a person or legal entity who acquires the land in good faith and expressly controls it, then the other party who feels that it has the right to the land, can no longer demand the exercise of the right if within a period of 5 years from the issuance of the certificate does not object in writing to the holder of the certificate or the Head of the Land Office concerned or does not file a lawsuit to the Court regarding the mastery or issuance of the certificate. Legal problems arise that a certificate that has been issued a certificate for 5 years can not be sued in court on an validity basis. The results showed that the cancellation of land rights certificate by tun court based on The State Administrative Court Law, cancellation of land certificates by deliberation and other efforts and unilateral settlement by the National Land Agency (BPN) has been carried out, where the plaintiffs held a review of the State Administrative Decision that has been issued can not be received by the plaintiff or the disputing party. Prior to the ruling that has legal force it remains prohibited for the relevant State Administration officials to carry out mutations on the land in question, it is to avoid the occurrence of problems in the future that cause harm to the litigants and third parties.
8
Massot, Jean. "Le juge administratif protecteur de la liberté individuelle." Zbornik radova Pravnog fakulteta u Splitu 54, no. 1 (2017): 1–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.31141/10.31141.zrpfs.2017.54.123.001.
Texto completoResumen
Introduction; Individual and civil freedoms; Individual freedom and the right to not being succumbed to self-willed closure; control of general acts. I the administrative judge for a long time has protected individual freedoms; I.1 In normal times; Freedom of Movement: passports, rights of foreigners, coerced psychiatric treatment; Freedom to enter Marriage, family life and free carrying out of profession; House of Taxation Search I.2 In times of crisis; First World War and the theory of state of emergency; Decolonisation, Terrorism: State of Emergency, Administrative jail and searches; II The administrative judge has developed new tools for confronting new challenges; II.1 New challenges; Human Dignity, Morsang sur Orge, Milhaud and Lambert court decisions; Health and Bioethics, Perruche judgement; Computers and Freedoms, Moon judgement; II.2 New tools; More frequent application of the court practice of the European Court for the protection of human rights; Reducing the area of internal measures (unilateral administrative act) ; Urgent procedure for bringing in measures for the protection of freedom; Priority issue of constitutionality, state of emergency; Conclusion: complementariness, and not competiveness between the general supervisory court and administrative courts.
9
Salim Alkharusi, Dhanina Said, Hamda Hamad Alsaadi, and Asma Abdul Rahman. "ATTITUDES OF THE SECTIONS DIRECTORS AT THE GENERAL DIRECTORATES OF EDUCATION IN THE SULTANATE OF OMAN TOWARDS ADMINISTRATIVE ACCOUNTABILITY." vol 5 issue 15 5, no. 15 (2019): 1592–606. http://dx.doi.org/10.18769/ijasos.592131.
Texto completoResumen
The objective of this quantitative study is; to investigate the attitudes of the heads of the sections in the General Directorates of Education in the Sultanate of Oman towards administrative accountability as well as to know the impact of gender, qualifications, experience and educational governate on the attitudes of the heads of the sections in the Directorates General of Education in the Sultanate of Oman towards administrative accountability and arriving at procedures to activate the administrative accountability. In order to achieve the aims of the study, a questionnaire of (39) statements distributed in four axes: the concept of administrative accountability, objectives of administrative accountability were developed. After checking the validity and reliability of the study tool. It was applied on a sample consisting of 197 head of a section from six governorates in Oman. Muscat, Batinah North, Batinah South, Dhahira North, Sharqia and Dakhliya. After collecting the data was analyzed by calculating the arithmetic means, standard deviations, and frequencies. To verify the significant differences attributable to the study variables, a unilateral variance analysis, test(v), Shaivism test were done for the study axes. The study results showed that the attitudes of the heads of the sections towards administrative accountability were high. The study also found that the study sample estimates for the following axes (the concept of accountability, objectives of administrative accountability, administrative accountability standards were high. The study also revealed estimates of the study sample for the axis administrative accountability constraints average. Keywords administrative accountability, departmental directions, , directorates of education
10
Goelzhauser, Greg, and David M. Konisky. "The State of American Federalism 2018–2019: Litigation, Partisan Polarization, and the Administrative Presidency." Publius: The Journal of Federalism 49, no. 3 (2019): 379–406. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/publius/pjz014.
Texto completoResumen
Abstract Several themes characterize the state of American federalism. Increasing political polarization shapes preferences with respect to locating the vertical balance of power. To implement these preferences, the federal government is primarily relying on regulatory rollback and unilateral action. With Congress largely unable or unwilling to check the executive branch, states have pushed back on use of the tools of the administrative presidency through litigation. We address these themes through an analysis of voting and elections along with important policy developments from the previous year in the areas of immigration, health care, environmental policy, education, gun control, and criminal justice. We also review important federalism developments from the Supreme Court’s 2017 term.
Tesis sobre el tema "Unilateral administrative"
1
Defoort, Benjamin. "La décision administrative." Thesis, Paris 2, 2012. http://www.theses.fr/2012PA020097.
Texto completoResumen
Expression la plus caractéristique du pouvoir de l’administration, la décision administrative est une notion familière. Pourtant, les données observables en droit positif s’avèrent hétérogènes et contingentes, compromettant la possibilité d’en circonscrire la teneur. Et derrière un consensus apparent, les présentations doctrinales de l’action adminis-trative unilatérale se caractérisent par un éclatement terminologique et conceptuel. Le choix a été fait de construire une définition, à partir d’une analyse critique du droit positif et du discours doctrinal, pour en éprouver les mérites en vue d’une meilleure compréhension de l’administration et de son droit. Signification impérative d’une manifestation de volonté uni-latérale et arrêtée d’une autorité administrative, la décision administrative constitue un utile outil d’analyse du pouvoir de l’administration, du contrôle du juge sur celui-ci et de la place à laquelle les citoyens peuvent prétendre dans son élaboration et sa mise en oeuvre. Distincte de l’incitation ou de la déclaration d’intention, la décision demeure le mode privilégié de direction de la conduite des citoyens et l’objet principal du contrôle du juge sur la légalité de l’action administrative. La portée explicative de cette définition est complétée par la compréhension qu’elle autorise des usages stratégiques que les acteurs du droit administratif peuvent en faire. En tant que signification, la décision révèle les luttes qu’ils mènent pour l’identification, au cas concret, de la portée des divers actes de l’administration ; enjeu de pouvoir, elle fait ressortir les stratégies de légitimation qui entourent son emploi par les autorités publiquesOne of the most characteristic expression of the administrative activities, the administrative decision is a familiar concept. Nevertheless, positive law on this subject turns out to be disparate and contingent. And behind a seeming consensus, the authors pre-sent the unilateral administrative actions with real terminological and conceptual disparities. The choice has been made to build a definition, from a critical analysis of positive law and doctrinal views, so as to test its merits with an eye to a better understanding of the Admin-istration and its law. Imperative meaning of a fixed and unilateral act of will of an adminis-trative body, the administrative decision is a useful tool to analyse the power of the Admin-istration, the judicial review of it and the place that citizens can aspire to in the process of its making and its implementation. Distinct from incitation or mere declaration of intent, deci-sion remains the preferred way of directing citizens behaviour and the main object of the judicial review of administrative acts. The explanatory impact of this definition is supple-mented by the understanding it enables of the strategical uses that actors of administrative law make of it. As a meaning, decision reveals the struggles they wage to identify, in a specif-ic case, the impact of the various acts of administrative bodies ; as a power issue, it brings out the strategies of legitimization that surround its use par public authorities
2
Pinel, Florian. "La participation du citoyen à la décision administrative." Thesis, Rennes 1, 2018. http://www.theses.fr/2018REN1G020.
Texto completoResumen
La participation du citoyen à la décision administrative est une notion qui se développe en droit positif. Toutefois, sa définition et ses contours ne font pas l’objet de consensus. La doctrine associe régulièrement la participation du citoyen à la démocratie administrative. Or, la participation remplit d’autres fonctions. Elle permet certes au citoyen de participer activement à la définition de l’intérêt général, mais elle lui permet aussi de défendre ses intérêts particuliers. Parallèlement, la participation du citoyen permet tout autant d’améliorer que de légitimer la décision administrative. La participation apparaît sous les traits d’une notion malléable. Sa fonction varie selon la psychologie des acteurs et selon la nature de l’instrument participatif qui la concrétise juridiquement. La notion de participation du citoyen à la décision administrative regroupe plusieurs instruments : les procédures contradictoires, la représentation des intérêts, les processus référendaires et les procédures participation du public. L’unité de la participation se dévoile dans son régime juridique qui est articulé autour de garanties communes assurant l’effectivité de la participation, à savoir le droit à l’information préalable, le droit d’expression un point de vue et le droit à un délai suffisant. Moins systématiquement, le régime juridique de la participation s’ouvre à des garanties complémentaires en vue d’assurer sa sincérité. Ainsi en va-t-il du droit à la prise en compte du point de vue, de la présence d’un tiers garant ainsi que du droit au recours. Toutes ces garanties font cependant l’objet d’une application diversifiées. L’unité de la participation du citoyen n’implique en effet pas son uniformitéCitizen participation to administrative decision is a developing concept in positive law. Still, its essence and scope have not reached consensus. The doctrine associates citizen participation to administrative democracy. Yet, participation fullfills other functions. It of course allows citizen to actively define general interest yet it also allows the citizen to defend his very own interest. At the same time, citizen participation both improves and legitimates administrative decision. Participation appears as a malleable concept. Its function depends not only on the actors psychology but also on the nature of the participatory instrument that legally implements it. The concept of citizen participation to administrative decision regroups several instruments, including the right to a hearing, representation of interests, referendum processes, and public participation procedures. The unity of participation gains meaning in its legal system, which is articulated around common guarantees ensuring the effectiveness of participation, that is to say, the right to prior information, the right to express a point of view and the right to an appropriate period of time to do so. Less systematically, the legal system of participation opens up to complementary guarantees to ensure its sincerity. This applies to the right of having a point of view considered, the presence of a third-party guarantor as well as the right to appeal. All these guarantees, however, are subject to diversified implementations. Indeed, citizen participation unity does not imply its uniformity
3
Morales, Martin. "La liberté de choix des personnes publiques entre le contrat et l'acte unilatéral." Thesis, Montpellier, 2016. http://www.theses.fr/2016MONTD029.
Texto completoResumen
Les personnes publiques ont la faculté de produire des normes par voie unilatérale ou contractuelle. Toutefois, ni la jurisprudence ni les textes n'affirment l'existence d'une liberté de choix entre ces deux instruments. L'observation du droit montre davantage de situations dans les personnes publiques ne peuvent pas librement choisir que des situations dans lesquelles elles ont effectivement cette liberté de choix. Le Conseil d'État est particulièrement actif, imposant tantôt le contrat, tantôt l'acte unilatéral pour l'exercice des compétences. Aussi, dans une discipline telle que le droit administratif, où l'action des personnes publiques est strictement encadrée par les normes de compétence, la doctrine n'est en général pas favorable à la reconnaissance de véritable liberté dans l'action au profit de l'Administration. Pourtant, le caractère objectif du droit administratif n'obère pas totalement la qualité de sujet de droit des personnes publiques ni leur capacité à exprimer une volonté propre. Le principe de la liberté de choix des modes de gestion illustre par exemple cette dimension libérale de l'action administrative. En réalité, dès l'instant où les normes de compétence n'ont pas vocation à prescrire l'instrument au moyen duquel une compétence doit être exercée, les personnes publiques disposent d'une liberté de choix entre le contrat et l'acte unilatéral. Si le législateur ou le Conseil d'État imposent aux personnes publiques d'utiliser le contrat ou l'acte unilatéral pour l'exercice de telle ou telle compétence, cela ne signifie pas pour autant que, en amont, les personnes publiques n'ont pas une liberté de choix. Au contraire, l'existence de limitation à la faculté d'agir révèle l'existence d'une liberté. Dès lors, la liberté de choix entre le contrat et l'acte unilatéral et son encadrement par le droit objectif constituent les deux pièces d'une même médaille, formant ainsi un droit général du recours au contrat ou à l'acte unilatéral. Il s'est agi de tracer les contours précis, tant sur un plan conceptuel que pratique, de la liberté de choix et de l'encadrement de cette liberté de choix, en révélant les mécanismes et critères en action sur les deux versants de deux droitsPublic entities have the ability to produce standards unilaterally or under contract. However, neither the law nor the texts affirm the existence of a choice between the two instruments. Observing the right shows more situations in public entities can not freely choose that situations where they actually have this freedom of choice. The State Council is particularly active, sometimes imposing the contract, sometimes unilateral act for the exercise of powers. Also, in a discipline such as administrative law, where the action of public persons is strictly governed by the standards of jurisdiction, the doctrine is generally not favorable to the recognition of true freedom in action for the benefit of 'Administration. Yet, the objective character of administrative law does not totally hampers the quality of legal subject of public figures or their ability to express their own will. The principle of freedom of choice of management methods illustrious example this liberal dimension of administrative action. In fact, as soon as the standards of competence are not intended to prescribe the instrument by which a jurisdiction must be exercised, public figures have a choice between the contract and the unilateral act. If Parliament or the Council of State to require public entities to use the contract or unilateral act for the performance of a particular jurisdiction, this does not mean that upstream, public figures have not a freedom of choice. On the contrary, the existence of limitations on the ability to act reveals the existence of freedom. Therefore, the choice between the contract and the unilateral act and its frame by objective law are the two parts of the same coin, thus forming a general right of appeal to the contract or the unilateral act. It came to trace the precise contours, both conceptually and practically, freedom of choice and the framing of this freedom of choice by revealing the mechanisms and criteria for action on both sides of two rights
4
Testard, Christophe. "Pouvoir de décision unilatérale de l'administration et democratie administrative." Thesis, Lyon, 2016. http://www.theses.fr/2016LYSE3057.
Texto completoResumen
Le pouvoir de décision unilatérale de l’administration entretient avec la démocratie administrative des rapports ambivalents. Appréhendée comme l’ensemble des règles qui tendent à la participation des administrés à l’élaboration des décisions administratives, la démocratie administrative est de prime abord contradictoire avec la dimension de contrainte et de commandement que l’unilatéralité manifeste. Faisant figure d’oxymore, elle s’est pourtant imposée à un pouvoir dont la légitimité semblait remise en cause. Le principe d’une participation des administrés irrigue désormais, à travers des procédés multiples et utilisant les nouvelles technologies, la relation entre le « public » et l’administration : la démocratie administrative a saisi le pouvoir de décision unilatérale.Pourtant, loin de remettre en cause ce pouvoir, la démocratie administrative vient en réalité le conforter. En se limitant à une ouverture du processus d’élaboration de certaines décisions administratives, le droit actuel de la participation des administrés n’atteint pas les caractères mêmes de l’unilatéralité. Les participants n’accèdent que très exceptionnellement au rang de coauteurs et leur influence sur le contenu de la décision est limitée. La sollicitation du public s’avère être un instrument de légitimation du volontarisme de la puissance publique. Avec le renfort du juge administratif, la participation des administrés demeure un simple moment procédural. La démocratie administrative se révèle être en définitive une notion malléable, dont l’administration tire profit dans l’exercice de son pouvoir de décision unilatéraleThe unilateral decision-making power of the administration maintains an ambivalent relationship with the administrative democracy. Understood as the set of rules which tend to the governed participation in the development of administrative decisions, administrative democracy is prima facie contradictory to the dimensions of constraint and command that are part of unilaterality. Standing as an oxymoron, it has yet imposed on a power which legitimacy seemed compromised. The principle of participation of the governed irrigates now, across multiple processes and through the use of new technologies, the relationship between the "public" and the administration: the administrative democracy has seized the power of unilateral decision.Yet far from questioning this power, the administrative democracy has actually strengthened it. Limiting itself to opening up the process of drafting of certain administrative decisions, the current right of participation of the governed does not reach the characters of unilateralism. Participants only access exceptionally to the rank of co-authors and their influence on the content of the decision remains limited. Public solicitation proves to be a legitimizing instrument of the voluntarism of the public authority. With the reinforcement of the administrative judge, citizen’s participation remains a simple procedural time. The administrative democracy ultimately proves to be a malleable concept, of which the administration benefits in exercising its power of unilateral decision
5
Vaiter-Romain, Nathalie. "L'acte administratif unilatéral : retour sur les tentatives de conceptualisation." Thesis, Paris Est, 2010. http://www.theses.fr/2010PEST2010.
Texto completoResumen
Si les administrativistes admettent que le prisme contentieux est déformant, il est toutefois remarquable de constater que la définition doctrinale de l'acte administratif unilatéral est généralement réduite à une équation entre un tel acte juridique et le recours pour excès de pouvoir.Partant d'un tel constat, il s'agissait de déconstruire les différentes versions du discours doctrinal qui se fondent exclusivement ou accessoirement sur le statut contentieux de l'acte, c'est-à-dire sur les éléments de légalité examinés à l'occasion du recours pour excès de pouvoir. En effet, le paradigme de la définition contentieuse a pour conséquence de n'envisager l'acte administratif unilatéral que comme une notion fonctionnelle, qui plus est contentieuse. Outre l'aspect technique de l'analyse, lareconstruction de la définition du concept d'acte administratif unilatéral passe par l'examen renouvelé de ses caractéristiques contemporaines. Par hypothèse, l'acte administratif unilatéral, concept au service de l'action de la puissance publique, peut être examiné à partir de son unilatéralité. Il s'agit dans ce cas de l'appréhender par opposition au contrat ce qui induiraitl'absence de consentement de son destinataire, en tant qu'acte de commandement de la puissancepublique au service de la mise en oeuvre de l'intérêt général, comme un acte contraignant etjusticiable à ce titre. La reconstruction de la définition part du postulat que les différentescomposantes de l'unilatéralité sont aujourd'hui affectées par les changements en cours en droitadministratif. Le concept évolutif d'acte administratif unilatéral peut recevoir une définitionrenouvelée, contemporaine et non strictement contentieuse grâce au double niveau d'analyseproposé un aspect plus technique et la recherche corrélative de la justification du recours auprocédé unilatéral en droit contemporain.Ainsi, l'acte administratif unilatéral peut être considéré comme l'acte juridique édicté par unepersonne habilitée son auteur juridique qui dispose de la faculté de le faire entrer en vigueur et enendosse la responsabilité juridique. Le processus de formation de l'acte est devenu pluraliste et placele destinataire de l'acte au centre de la théorie dès lors que l'on parvient à établir que sa participationet son consentement sont recueillis au moment de l'élaboration. Un tel acte juridique ne se borne pasà modifier l'ordonnancement juridique. Plus largement, il crée ou affecte la situation juridique (lesdroits et les obligations) et matérielle de ses destinataires, de ses auteurs et dans certaineshypothèses des tiers. En outre, il est la manifestation privilégiée de la puissance publique au servicede l'intérêt général. Le plus fréquemment, il est possible d'en contester la légalité à l'appui d'unrecours juridictionnel devant les juges de la légalité administrativeSummary not transmitted
6
El, Zanati Khaled. "Le pouvoir de l'administration dans la modification et la résiliation unilatérales des contrats administratifs : études comparatives des droits français, égyptien et libyen." Thesis, Paris 1, 2017. http://www.theses.fr/2017PA01D059.
Texto completoResumen
Le droit privé érige le contrat en loi des parties. Cette règle connaît des exceptions en droit administratif: branche du droit dans laquelle la puissance publique dispose d’un pouvoir de modification et de résiliation unilatérales. Cependant, si l’administration dispose de pouvoirs étendues dans l’exercice de son pouvoirs de modification et de résiliation unilatérales des contrats administratifs pour des motifs tenant à l’intérêt général, aucune définition minutieuse de la notion d’intérêt général n’a encore été consacrée. Cette imprécision conduit, dans certains cas, à l’exercice quasi arbitraire par l’administration de ses pouvoirs et au déséquilibre du contrat. Cette situation a entraîné divers préjudices pour les bénéficiaires de projet en raison de la suspension de la mise en œuvre de plusieurs contrats importants pour une longue période et, en conséquence, a accru le nombre des litigesThe rule in private law is that the contract is considered to be the absolute law between the contracting parties, and therefore it cannot be modified or terminated without their consent. That is not the case in the field of administrative law as long as this law permits the administration to use its authority in unilateral amendment and termination of the contract. The problem can be stated here that the administration white practicing its authority in unilateral , modification or termination the contract might abuse its right of such practice under the justification of undefined concept of public interest. The ambiguous and loos of the concept of public interest led to the illegitimate and misuse of the administration of its authority in unilateral amendment and termination of administrative contract which results in disturbance of the balance between the interests of the administration on one hand and the other contracting party on the other
7
Maublanc, Jean-Victor. "Le marché des autorisations administratives à objet économique." Thesis, Pau, 2016. http://www.theses.fr/2016PAUU2009/document.
Texto completoResumen
En matière économique, l'autorisation administrative est un instrument de contrôle du marché dont l'instauration et souvent l'allocation sont théoriquement décidées par l'État. Le recours au marché pour distribuer certaines autorisations administratives bouscule cette présentation. L'autorisation administrative devient l'objet même d'un marché tout en étant un outil censé le réguler. Une fois admise cette ambivalence, se pose la question de la pérennité du contrôle de l'État lorsque l'octroi des autorisations administratives qu'il prévoit repose sur le marché. Susceptible de mettre les bienfaits de ce mode d'allocation des ressources au service de la régulation de l'économie, cette évolution du régime de l'autorisation administrative peut en même temps exprimer la soumission à la loi du marché de la régulation étatique au moyen de l'autorisation administrative.L'objet de cette thèse est de démontrer que l'État n'a qu'une influence limitée sur l'allocation marchande des autorisations administratives à objet économique. Impuissant à empêcher la formation du marché en raison des considérations économiques et psychologiques qui président à sa construction, il l'encourage généralement de façon involontaire ou sous la contrainte. Avec l'Union européenne, les opérateurs économiques soumis à autorisation préalable sont les premiers artisans du marché. Une fois le marché construit, des leviers d'intervention permettent à l'État d'influencer les échanges d'autorisations administratives. En adoptant tour à tour les rôles d'offreur d'autorisations administratives, de demandeur et d'autorité régulatrice, il cumule les facultés de contrôle respectivement attachées à ces fonctions. La circonstance que ces compétences soient toutes partagées et pas nécessairement mises en œuvre atténue notablement ce constatIn the economic sphere, administrative authorization is traditionally considered a tool used to control the market, with its creation and oftentimes, allocation being, in theory, the result of the State’s decision. Appealing to the market itself for the distribution some administrative authorizations shifts this paradigm. The administrative authorization becomes itself the subject of the market that it supposedly regulates. With this ambivalence having been underlined, the durability of the State’s control over administrative authorizations can be questioned when the market itself determines the authorizations’ distribution. While this evolution could benefit the process of economic regulation with the introduction of its resource distribution model, it could simultaneously reflect the submission of State regulation to the law of the market, through the use of the administrative authorization
8
Blanc, François. "Les engagements dans le droit français des concentrations." Thesis, Paris 2, 2012. http://www.theses.fr/2012PA020059.
Texto completoResumen
De prime abord, le droit des concentrations illustre le rôle moderne joué par l’État dans l’économie : il ne s’agit plus de construire les marchés, mais de contrôler ponctuellement un ou plusieurs opérateur(s) en particulier. L’État libéral soumet ainsi à autorisation préalable les rapprochements d’entreprises, afin de vérifier que ceux-ci ne portent pas atteinte à la concurrence. Pourtant, dans le silence de la loi, tout se passe comme si l’administration se servait de la concentration comme d’un vecteur d’une réorganisation des marchés. Le procédé est d’autant plus subtil qu’il implique étroitement les entreprises elles-mêmes : tout repose sur les « engagements » que celles-ci proposent à l’administration dans le but de prévenir les effets anticoncurrentiels de leur projet. Car ces engagements connaissent une mutation juridique décisive : une fois émis, ils deviennent une mesure de police économique, incorporée dans l’autorisation administrative. Le procédé, développé à l’époque de l’économie administrée, dénote la constance du droit français par-delà la variation des objectifs économiques. Or, ces engagements contraignent les parties à la concentration, d’une part dans leurs actes avec d’autres opérateurs sur le marché et, d’autre part, dans leurs rapports à l’administration : ils orientent l’action de la concentration vis-à-vis des tiers tout en prolongeant le contrôle administratif. Incorporant les engagements dans son acte, l’administration modifie puis surveille les relations entre les parties et les tiers à l’opération. Aussi, son intervention se déplace, ratione temporis, de la concentration en projet à la concentration réalisée, et, ratione personae, des parties à l’opération aux tiers. Elle se déplace en somme de la concentration vers le marché. S’il ne s’agit donc plus, comme par le passé, de construire directement le marché, l’administration utilise désormais à cette fin les entreprises soumises à son autorisationAt first sight, the mergers’s control illustrates the modern role played by the State in the economy: the aim is not to organize the markets anymore, but to control from time to time one or several particular operators. The liberal State submit the companies’s merging processes to prior authorization, so as to make sure they do not negatively affect the competition. Nevertheless, in the silence of the law, everything goes as if the administration was using mergers as drivers of the markets’s reorganization. This process is evenmore subtil because it implies closely the companies themselves: everything depends on the commitments the companies offer to the administration, in order to prevent the non competitive effects of their project. These commitments are indeed undergoing a major legal change: once issued, they become a measure of economic restriction, embedded in the administration’s authorization. This process, that has been developed from the time of planned economy, suggests a certain permanency of the French law, despite the economic goals’s variation. Yet, these commitments constrain the parties about to merge: on the one hand regarding their actions towards other operators on the market, and on the other hand, regarding their relation with the administration : at the same time they direct the merger according to the stakeholders, and extend the administrative control. In short, when embedding the commitments in its act, the administration first changes the relations between the parties and the stakeholders, then follows up the relations’s execution. Thus, its intervention swifts ratione temporis, -from the merger in progress to the merger achieved, ratione personae, from the parties to the stakeholders’ operations, and ratione materia, from the merger to the market. Time has gone when the administration used to build the market directly ; now it uses to this end the companies that have to require her authorization
9
Crouzatier-Durand, Florence. "La fin de l'acte administratif unilatéral /." Paris ; Budapest ; Torino : l'Harmattan, 2003. http://catalogue.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cb391110247.
Texto completo
10
Renders, David. "La consolidation législative de l'acte administratif unilatéral /." Bruxelles : Bruylant [u.a.], 2003. http://www.gbv.de/dms/spk/sbb/recht/toc/373496982.pdf.
Texto completoLibros sobre el tema "Unilateral administrative"
1
Kirby, Mark Bobela-Mota. Contratos sobre o exercício de poderes públicos: O exercício contratualizado do poder administrativo de decisão unilateral. Coimbra Editora, 2011.
2
Torres, Galo. Terminación unilateral de contratos administrativos. Municipio del Distrito Metropolitano de Quito, Procuraduría del Distrito, 1995.
3
Dumas, Bernard. How long do unilateral target zones last? University of Stockholm, Institute for International Economic Studies, 1991.
4
Dumas, Bernard. How long do unilateral target zones last? Centre for Economic Policy Research, 1992.
5
Dumas, Bernard. How long do unilateral target zones last? National Bureau of Economic Research, 1991.
6
Guimarães, Fernando Vernalha. Alteração unilateral do contrato administrativo: Interpretação de dispositivos da Lei 8,666/1993. Malheiros Editores, 2003.
7
Lambert, Damien. L' administration de George W. Bush et les Nations Unies. L'Harmattan, 2005.
8
Lambert, Damien. L' administration de George W. Bush et les Nations Unies. L'Harmattan, 2005.
9
Fracchia, Fabrizio. L'accordo sostitutivo: Studio sul consenso disciplinato dal diritto amministrativo in funzione sostitutiva rispetto agli strumenti unilaterali di esercizio del potere. CEDAM, 1998.
10
Zambian crisis behaviour: Confronting Rhodesia's unilateral declaration of independance, 1965-1966. McGill-Queen's University Press, 1994.
Capítulos de libros sobre el tema "Unilateral administrative"
1
Renders, David, Luca Ceci, and Sarah Koval. "Administrative Procedure and Judicial Review in Belgium." In Judicial Review of Administration in Europe. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198867609.003.0004.
Texto completoResumen
This chapter evaluates administrative procedure and judicial review in Belgium. The Belgian Constitution embodies, in particular, two constitutional provisions for the judicial oversight of unilateral administrative measures. A Council of State was established pursuant to Article 160 of the Constitution. Under the Act adopted on the basis of this provision, the Council of State is responsible for judicial review, on condition that such review has not been attributed to another ordinary or administrative court. Moreover, Article 159 requires judges not to apply any unilateral administrative measure that would be unlawful in the context of a dispute that they are called upon to settle. All unilateral administrative provisions, whether regulatory or individual, may be reviewed. A procedural error does not necessarily lead to the censure of the unilateral administrative provision in question. However, the breach of a requirement that the administration has to fulfil leads not only to the censure of the provision but can, as the case may be, give rise to compensation.
2
Cordelli, Chiara. "Legitimizing Administrative Discretion." In The Privatized State. Princeton University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691205755.003.0004.
Texto completoResumen
This chapter argues that the rationale for a democratic state is to curb a form of subjection to the merely unilateral and legislative will of others. It describes bureaucratic unilateralism, which is the just and effective administration of the modern state risks that reproduce the problem within the state itself by demanding the delegation of a form of quasi-legislative discretion to administrators. It also shows how bureaucratic unilateralism in the privatized state is unavoidably transferred to private actors. The chapter argues the solution or mitigation of bureaucratic unilateralism through the direct application of certain standards of legitimation directly to the exercise of quasi-legislative, administrative discretion. It discusses the requirements of standards, which imply that the delegation of relevant discretion be validly authorized by a democratic and indicate a neat separation between contract and office in order to support officeholders' commitment to implement the law.
3
Sandoval, Alejandro Monjaraz. "Outline of Border Relations Between Mexico and the United States." In Advances in Public Policy and Administration. IGI Global, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-5205-6.ch008.
Texto completoResumen
This chapter bases its premise on the fact that US foreign policy becomes a reality with certain areas of opportunity, dictated from the presidency, as it promotes unilateral policies focusing on migration from Mexico, securitization and militarization of the border, and the development of an economic strategy. Unfortunately, this defense of interests unilaterally has caused border states and municipalities to set their own objectives, development plans, and border and binational diplomacy and policy decisions and strategies.
4
Newman, David. "Conflict at the Interface : The Impact of Boundaries and Borders on Contemporary Ethnonational Conflict." In The Geography of War and Peace. Oxford University Press, 2004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780195162080.003.0022.
Texto completoResumen
Boundaries may have become more permeable than in the past, but they remain the hard lines that determine the territorial extent of the state and, by definition, the citizenship of those residing therein. Notwithstanding the discourse of deterritorialization and the “end of the state,” the hard boundaries that separate states in the international system remain important delimiters of power and partial sovereignty in the contemporary world. The relative impact of these boundaries on the surrounding borderland regimes has changed, in many cases to allow greater movement of people, goods, information, and cultural exchanges. But the impact of these changes remains highly differentiated and affects some areas, such as Western Europe, far more than others, where boundaries retain their traditional role as barriers to movement and interaction. In attempting to understand these changes, boundary studies have undergone a major renaissance during the past decade. From the study of hard territorial lines and the process of boundary demarcation, contemporary research has taken on a wider range of boundary-related topics, such as territorial identities, borderlands and border regimes, the perception of boundaries, and the nature of boundary management. The analysis of boundaries has also shifted in focus from the preeminence of international boundaries to include a range of spatial and administrative intrastate scales, in which the functional impact of the boundary/border on the daily lives of people is as great as, if not greater than, the line that separates one state from another. It is the process of bordering, rather than the course of the line per se, that is important to our understanding of how boundaries affect the nature of interaction, cooperation, and/or conflict between peoples. This is part of a dynamic process in which boundaries not only reflect a given formal political or administrative status as determined by the state, but are also reformulated as a result of war, conflict resolution, negotiations, unilateral imposition, and so on. Conflict still takes place in and around boundaries and borderlands, in some cases as a result of traditional issues of demarcation with respect to territorial attributes, such as natural resources, and in others as a result of their incompatibility with the expanding horizons of identity politics.
5
Bennett, Peggy D. "Rankism in schools." In Teaching with Vitality. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190673987.003.0054.
Texto completoResumen
“Rankism,” as Fuller describes it, may not be a critical problem in schools. Yet some could benefit from knowing this “ism” and how it can manifest itself and destabilize relationships. As an assertion of superiority, rankism can be subtle or blatant and can serve as a framework to explain some behaviors that feel dominating or oppressive. • A co- worker treats his number of years teaching as license to prevail in making decisions about school practices. • A principal makes a unilateral decision without consulting the teachers it will affect. • Teachers behave with aloofness toward custodial teams and administrative assistants. Though perhaps subtle, each of these three events can send the message “I outrank you. So do what I say.” Imagine a scene where students are leaving your class. As you stand at the door, students file out. You stop Samuel, who has had chronic behavior challenges. “You were much better behaved today, Samuel. I’m proud of your improvement.” The confused when a teacher says, “These are your three friends for this activity.” Others may become resentful and angry. The social milieu of schools is both delicate and sturdy. What might be gained if we help students understand the differences between being a friend and being friendly? How might students benefit from knowing what being a friend means and what being friendly looks like? Rather than telling students (or anyone else) that they are friends, we can encourage them to be friendly. We can let them see where their preferences for friendships take them.
6
Hakelberg, Lukas. "Countering Harmful Tax Practices." In The Hypocritical Hegemon. Cornell University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501748011.003.0003.
Texto completoResumen
This chapter shows that the Clinton administration promoted an international campaign against underregulated financial centers. It did so because it was concerned about the impact of tax havens on the perceived fairness of the US tax system, international financial stability, and the US sanctions regime. The Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD), however, made the strategic mistake to tackle tax evasion by individuals and tax avoidance by multinationals in a single project, creating opposition from business associations in the United States and elsewhere. Instead of credibly linking noncompliance with OECD recommendations to economic sanctions, the Clinton administration thus accepted the severe dilution of the harmful tax competition initiative's anti-avoidance elements even before the Bush administration took office in 2001. A nested comparison of two unilateral tax initiatives moreover reveals that the Clinton administration generally failed to pass regulations curbing tax avoidance but succeeded in passing regulations against tax evasion.
7
"EL CONTRATO ESTATAL COMO FORMA DE COLABORACIÓN Y LA LIMITACIÓN COMO ACTO UNILATERAL ¿VERDADEROS CRITERIOS DE DISTINCIÓN?" In Autorizaciones y concesiones en el derecho administrativo colombiano. Serie de derecho administrativo n.° 21. Universidad del Externado de Colombia, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/j.ctv13vdgrk.8.
Texto completo
8
Koh, Harold Hongju. "Could the President Unilaterally Terminate All International Agreements?" In The Restatement and Beyond. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197533154.003.0003.
Texto completoResumen
This chapter examines Section 313 of the Fourth Restatement of the Foreign Relations Law, regarding “Authority to Suspend, Terminate, or Withdraw from Treaties.” That provision states that “according to established practice, the president has the authority to act on behalf of the United States in suspending or terminating U.S. treaty commitments and in withdrawing the United States from treaties.” While the reporters cautioned that this section currently applies only to Article II treaties, one of them recently wrote that “if presidents do have the legal authority to withdraw from Article II treaties, it is not clear why that authority would not extend to congressional-executive agreements” and presumably, other agreements as well. Donald Trump’s tumultuous presidency has called this broad supposition into question. Since 2017, the Trump administration has announced its withdrawal from a host of bilateral and multilateral arrangements. One could easily imagine this president and his lawyers misconstruing Section 313 as justifying a general power of the president to terminate, suspend, or withdraw from any and all international agreements to which the United States is a party. The chapter argues that no such power exists. The U.S. Constitution does not confer upon the president a general unilateral power of treaty termination. Nor can such a general unilateral power be derived from constitutional text, structure, or U.S. Supreme Court precedent.
9
Sigurðsson, Jón Viðar. "Kings and Their Friends." In Viking Friendship. Cornell University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.7591/cornell/9781501705779.003.0004.
Texto completoResumen
This chapter examines how the kings and chieftains made use of friendship to secure their positions of power in Norway. The Norwegian kings used friendship to the highest degree to secure support for themselves from local chieftains and householders. However, in the long run friendship was unsuitable as a political foundation for the kings' power. In accordance with a new ideology that developed at the end of the twelfth century and in the first half of the thirteenth, friendship was replaced with obedience and service. To put it simply, a transition occurred from bilateral to unilateral relationships. After these changes, the king no longer needed to establish friendships with the householders; they had become his subjects to rule. However, the king continued to use friendship to secure the loyalty of the most central persons in the royal administration.
10
Bertrand, Gilles, Samer Lahoud, Miklós Molnár, and Géraldine Texier. "QoS Routing and Management in Backbone Networks." In Intelligent Quality of Service Technologies and Network Management. IGI Global, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-61520-791-6.ch008.
Texto completoResumen
The Internet relies on the cooperation of competitive network operators that typically administrate their networks unilaterally and autonomously to interconnect people and companies in different locations. Recent work calls for extending this organizational model with augmented interactions between network operators, to provide a higher level of endtoend quality of service and to ease certain aspects of traffic management in backbone networks. This chapter presents the emerging collaborative network management models as well as related technologies. In particular, it describes recent techniques for interdomain traffic engineering and for qualityofservice aware routing. The detailed methods are of great interest for network operators and permit the development of new types of commercial relationships between them, ranging from simple interconnection agreements to collaborative traffic management and automated provisioning.
Actas de conferencias sobre el tema "Unilateral administrative"
1
Eshraghi, Shaun, Kristine Severson, David Hynd, and A. Benjamin Perlman. "Finite Element Model Validation of the Hybrid-III Rail Safety (H3-RS) Anthropomorphic Test Device (ATD)." In ASME 2018 International Mechanical Engineering Congress and Exposition. American Society of Mechanical Engineers, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/imece2018-87736.
Texto completoResumen
The Hybrid-III Rail Safety (H3-RS) anthropomorphic test device (ATD), also known as a crash test dummy, was developed by the Rail Safety and Standards Board (RSSB), DeltaRail (now Resonate Group Ltd.), and the Transport Research Laboratory (TRL) in the United Kingdom between 2002 and 2005 for passenger rail safety applications [1]. The H3-RS is a modification of the standard Hybrid-III 50th percentile male (H3-50M) ATD with additional features in the chest and abdomen to increase its biofidelity and eight sensors to measure deflection. The H3-RS features bilateral (left and right) deflection sensors in the upper and lower chest and in the upper and lower abdomen; whereas, the standard H3-50M only features a single unilateral (center) deflection sensor in the chest with no deflection sensors located in the abdomen. Additional H3-RS research was performed by the Volpe National Transportation Systems Center (Volpe Center) under the direction of the U.S. Department of Transportation, Federal Railroad Administration (FRA) Office of Research, Development, and Technology. The Volpe Center contracted with TRL to conduct a series of dynamic pendulum impact tests [2]. The goal of testing the abdomen response of the H3-RS ATD was to develop data to refine an abdomen design that produces biofidelic and repeatable results under various impact conditions with respect to impactor geometry, vertical impact height, and velocity. In this study, the abdominal response of the H3-RS finite element (FE) model that TRL developed is validated using the results from pendulum impact tests [2]. Results from the pendulum impact tests and corresponding H3-RS FE simulations are compared using the longitudinal relative deflection measurements from the internal sensors in the chest and abdomen as well as the longitudinal accelerometer readings from the impactor. The abdominal response of the H3-RS FE model correlated well with the physical ATD as the impactor geometry, vertical impact height, and velocity were changed. There were limitations with lumbar positioning of the H3-RS FE model as well as the material definition for the relaxation rate of the foam in the abdomen that can be improved in future work. The main goal of validating the abdominal response of the dummy model is to enable its use in assessing injury potential in dynamic sled testing of crashworthy workstation tables, the results of which are presented in a companion paper [3]. The authors used the model of the H3-RS ATD to study the 8G sled test specified in the American Public Transportation Association (APTA) workstation table safety standard [4]. The 8G sled test is intended to simulate the longitudinal crash accleration in a severe train-to-train collision involving U.S. passenger equipment. Analyses of the dynamic sled test are useful for studying the sensitivity of the sled test to factors such as table height, table force-crush behavior, seat pitch, etc., which help to inform discussions on revisions to the test requirements eventually leading to safer seating environments for passengers.