Gotowa bibliografia na temat „Algorithmic Statecraft”

The rapid growth of artificial intelligence (AI) has ushered in a new era of governance, with China leading the charge in algorithmic statecraft. China's approach to AI-driven governance blends extensive surveillance, big data analysis, and predictive technologies to bolster state control and ensure social stability. While numerous studies delve into digital authoritarianism or China's AI efforts individually, there’s a noticeable lack of research on how these elements intersect within the larger framework of global governance. This paper aims to fill that void by examining how China's domestic model is shaping international digital norms. By utilizing secondary data from academic research, policy documents, and global governance metrics, the study investigates how China is embedding AI across various sectors. It reveals that China's export of surveillance technologies and its advocacy for "cyber-sovereignty" principles pose challenges to liberal democratic ideals and could lead to a fragmentation of global governance systems. The research posits that China's algorithmic statecraft serves as both a tool for domestic control and a strategy for geopolitical influence. The paper wraps up by calling for more comparative research and international regulations to ensure that AI aligns with democratic values.

This theoretical article examines the transformative impact of Artificial Intelligence (AI) on traditional state capacities, presenting an original conceptual model that repositions bureaucratic competencies in light of automation, predictive analytics, and machine learning. Drawing from interdisciplinary theories of institutional capacity, public innovation, and algorithmic governance, the study explores three interrelated dimensions: (i) the reconfiguration of public policy analysis through big data and algorithmic tools; (ii) the automation of implementation functions in state services; and (iii) the ethical, normative, and epistemological challenges involved in delegating decisions to AI systems. The proposed model reveals how AI reshapes bureaucratic roles, blurs the boundary between technical rationality and political discretion, and inaugurates new forms of technopolitical governance. It highlights emerging risks such as algorithmic opacity, reduced accountability, and erosion of discretionary autonomy. The study advocates for a new framework of public algorithmic governance rooted in transparency, explainability, and institutional safeguards. Far from proposing a deterministic perspective, the article invites critical reflection on how AI mediates power, redefines legitimacy, and generates both opportunities and dilemmas for 21st-century statecraft. It contributes to advancing theoretical debates on digital bureaucracy, algorithmic justice, and the future of democratic governance.

In the contemporary landscape of international relations, the fusion of digital politics and big data analytics has emerged as a pivotal force reshaping diplomatic strategies and national foreign policy. This paper delves into the intricate interplay between digital politics and Indonesian foreign policy within the expansive realm of big data. Indonesia is a dynamic archipelago boasting a burgeoning digital ecosystem that serves as an illuminating case study to unravel the multifaceted dynamics of this intersection. In this era of information overload (Wood et al., 1998), big data analytics revolutionized the traditional diplomacy paradigm, offering unprecedented insight into global trends, public sentiment, and policy preferences. Traditionally grounded in diplomatic norms and statecraft, Indonesian foreign policy is now navigating the data stream, leveraging digital technologies to enhance strategic decision-making. The convergence of digital politics and big data has democratized access to information and posed novel challenges, including privacy, misinformation, and algorithmic biases (Boyd, 2008). Against this backdrop, Indonesian policymakers are tasked with crafting nuanced approaches to harness the potential of big data while safeguarding national interest and democratic values. Through a comprehensive analysis of Internet research methods through case studies, policy initiatives, and theoretical frameworks, this paper illuminates the transformative potential of big data in shaping the contours of Indonesian foreign policy. By exploring the synergies between digital politics and diplomatic endeavors, this study contributes to a deeper understanding of the evolving landscape of international relations in the digital age.

Abstract The belief in quantitative indicators based on standardized data as an effective tool has become more entrenched than ever before, in both public and corporate governance, because of a drive to achieve more efficiency and accountability. The power of automated computation systems and the ubiquitous availability of big data have magnified the potential and capacities for quantification. The People’s Republic of China (prc) has enthusiastically embraced these advanced technologies. The rapid digitization and automation of social governance in China, called “smart governance,” entail new approaches to social and political control, driven by innovations in algorithmic systems, big data analytics, and artificial intelligence. This article seeks to reveal the ideological foundations of the prc’s push for the digitization and automation of social governance. Drawing on international scholarship on Chinese Marxism and Leninism, it argues that the positivist organizational and ideological principles of Marxism-Leninism help explain why technology and automation are embraced so enthusiastically by the Chinese party-state: they provide a way to achieve the dream of rational Marxist governance. Through an empirical analysis of 120 articles from 2014 to 2021, this article illustrates that these ideas are, or may be, a vital part of shaping academic discourse around smart governance in China today. An analysis of Chinese academic discourse is an essential part of understanding the ideological foundations of Chinese Communist Party (ccp) governance and statecraft and how these commitments shape the embrace and deployment of smart technologies. The way in which scholars discuss the transformative power of smart technologies demonstrates a similar ideological understanding of social governance.

The rapid growth of artificial intelligence (AI) has ushered in a new era of governance, with China leading the charge in algorithmic statecraft. China's approach to AI-driven governance blends extensive surveillance, big data analysis, and predictive technologies to bolster state control and ensure social stability. While numerous studies delve into digital authoritarianism or China's AI efforts individually, there’s a noticeable lack of research on how these elements intersect within the larger framework of global governance. This paper aims to fill that void by examining how China's domestic model is shaping international digital norms. By utilizing secondary data from academic research, policy documents, and global governance metrics, the study investigates how China is embedding AI across various sectors. It reveals that China's export of surveillance technologies and its advocacy for "cyber-sovereignty" principles pose challenges to liberal democratic ideals and could lead to a fragmentation of global governance systems. The research posits that China's algorithmic statecraft serves as both a tool for domestic control and a strategy for geopolitical influence. The paper wraps up by calling for more comparative research and international regulations to ensure that AI aligns with democratic values.

AbstractArtificial Intelligence (AI) is playing an increasing role in humanitarian space requiring the integration of human rights into AI and human rights-based approach (HRBA) into law and policy relating to the Climate Change-induced Disaster Displacement (CiDD) in India. AI has the potential to significantly impact low-emission, climate-resilient development as well as CiDD. The UN Climate Change Initiative on AI for Climate Action investigates how AI might be used as a potent instrument to advance and intensify climate action that is revolutionary and pragmatic. Therefore, the CiDD crisis must also be re-imagined and operationalised for protecting human rights instead of posing risks to inherent human dignity and human protection at the intersection of National Disaster Laws (NDL), National Climate Law Frameworks (NCLF) and International Human Rights Law (IHRL). The institutional capabilities of the AI-driven systems pose challenges to the human rights of the CiDD population that has become a threat multiplier. Therefore, AI technologies must be designed and developed to incorporate diagnostic, formative, and summative digital assessments of the CiDD situations. The digital assessments must be integrated with NDL, NCLF, and IHRL frameworks to facilitate the protection of human rights. In protecting human rights, the changing climate conditions have necessitated a specific legally binding international Human Rights Protection Framework (HRPF) during CiDD situations. Therefore, India can create AI-driven automatic decision-making (ADM) systems in collaboration with Asia–Pacific countries or otherwise to protect human rights in CiDD scenarios. Thus, in India and elsewhere, AI technologies, AI policies, and accountability systems operationalise human rights protection and contribute to attaining Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) in climate statecraft and beyond. In this chapter, I explore the space to integrate AI into NDL, NCLF, and IHRL frameworks with the human rights-based approach (HRBA). I investigate the questions around legal and policy considerations, such as the divergences and convergences of AI norms between NDL on CiDD and the protection of human rights in India. Can AI help national governments better prepare for CiDD migration? What are the specific AI tools and AI best practices that India can adopt for operationalizing the ADM systems and integrating them with the NDL and IHRL framework? Can AI be used to direct and operationalize the IHRL framework in the CiDD crisis? Should AI Ethics be invoked to plug gaps in CiDD emergency and raise standards above the minimum requirements of IHRL obligations in India? Would the age of algorithmic humanitarianism be sufficient for protecting human rights in CiDD prosceniums?