Gotowa bibliografia na temat „Forensic genetics – Technique”

Genetic testimony: A guide to forensic DNA profiling. Upper Saddle River, N.J: Pearson Prentice Hall, 2004.

Sheng wu xue zheng ju yan jiu yu ying yong: Research and Application of Biological Evidence. Beijing Shi: Fa lü chu ban she, 2012.

Belair, Robert R. Forensic DNA analysis: Issues. Washington, D.C: U.S. Dept. of Justice, Office of Justice Programs, Bureau of Justice Statistics, 1991.

Mazzotta, Guillermo Cejas. Identificación por ADN. 2nd ed. Mendoza: Ediciones Jurídicas Cuyo, 2000.

Brinkmann, B. DNA-Technologie in der medizinischen Kriminalistik. Lübeck: Schmidt-Römhild, 1997.

Hammond, Holly A. Automated DNA typing: Method of the future? : a summary of a research study conducted. [Washington, D.C.]: U.S. Dept. of Justice, Office of Justice Program, National Institute of Justice, 1997.

Meeting, Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Gen-Diagnostik. DNA-Polymorphism in forensic and medicine: 4th Annual Meeting 1988, Arbeitsgemeinschaft für Gen-Diagnostik e.V. Edited by Driesel Albert J, Henke J, and Kömpf J. Heidelberg: Hürtig Buch Verlag, 1990.

Rudin, Norah. Forensic DNA analysis: Protocols in forensic science. Boca Raton, FL: CRC, 2002.

International Symposium on the Forensic Aspects of DNA Analysis (1989 Forensic Science Research and Training Center, FBI Academy). Proceedings of the International Symposium on the Forensic Aspects of DNA Analysis: June 19-23, 1989, Forensic Science Research and Training Center, FBI Academy, Quantico, Virginia. Washington, DC: The Division, 1989.

Expert Working Group on Human Factors in Latent Print Analysis. Latent print examination and human factors: Improving the practice through a systems approach : the report of the Expert Working Group on Human Factors in Latent Print Analysis. [Washington, D.C.]: NIST, National Institute of Standards and Technology, 2012.

Raghunath, Rajshree. "Research Trends in Forensic Sciences." In Advances in Standardization Research, 108–24. IGI Global, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-3457-0.ch008.

Nichols, Richard A. "The Application of Molecular Genetic Techniques in Forensic Science." In Biotechnology, 649–57. CRC Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1201/9781003078432-32.

Aneja, Mannat Jot Singh, Tarunpreet Bhatia, Gaurav Sharma, and Gulshan Shrivastava. "Artificial Intelligence Based Intrusion Detection System to Detect Flooding Attack in VANETs." In Handbook of Research on Network Forensics and Analysis Techniques, 87–100. IGI Global, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-4100-4.ch006.

"Genes." In Examining the Causal Relationship Between Genes, Epigenetics, and Human Health, 205–35. IGI Global, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-8066-9.ch010.

T., Subbulakshmi. "Combating Cyber Security Breaches in Digital World Using Misuse Detection Methods." In Advances in Digital Crime, Forensics, and Cyber Terrorism, 85–92. IGI Global, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-5225-0193-0.ch006.

Sitaram Kadu, Sandeep. "DNA Finger-Printing: Current Scenario and Future." In Biological Anthropology - Applications and Case Studies [Working Title]. IntechOpen, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.99305.

Parrington, John. "Life as a Machine." In Redesigning Life, 209–33. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198766834.003.0010.

"which a social group or individual thinks is wrong. So the first port of call will be the courts, where we should be able to expect an independent judiciary. However, it is also true that sometimes actions and decisions are taken which, although in themselves not contentious, accumulate along with other legislation to create a highly questionable situation. Note here that the situation becomes questionable: an interpretation of the rules becomes possible which some would simply not agree with. For example, progressive attitudes towards free speech has resulted in the situation being taken advantage of by extreme groups for political ends. There are a number of very specific points which can be made about the use of DNA by society and more especially the construction and use of DNA databases. It is unlikely that anybody would really object to construction of anonymous databases so that we can produce a precise and reliable figure for the probability of finding a DNA profile in the general population by chance alone. What many people do have objections to is the construction of databases of named individuals. Strangely, it would seem that the country that has always been in the van of development of DNA technology is developing a rather poorer reputation for riding roughshod over the rights of its population, the UK. The problems and objections with databases of named individuals start with the practitioners and political will by successive governments. Luckily, there is an outspoken reaction to the UK government’s belief that all uses of DNA are good, but we should be aware that this is not so. Current thinking is that in the future it will be possible to determine facial shape, such as nose type and eye colour, with a simple test. This is put forward as a distinct possibility by the Forensic Science Service, with little regard to the extreme complexity of both the genetics and the environmental input into such things, not to mention plastic surgery. While it was always the belief that rapid turnaround of DNA results would be a good thing, this is only if the techniques are highly controlled. The idea that a hand held machine, as has been suggested, could be taken to a scene of crime and the DNA analysed in situ should fill any self-respecting scientist with horror. It has already been stated that there is a 40% chance of a stain found at a crime scene being linked to a name on the database of named individuals. As databases become larger as well as the number of individuals putting data on the database, so the likelihood of error increases; remember that error in this sense is quite likely to ruin a life. Names get onto databases for perfectly innocent reasons. Two of these are the husband or partner of a rape victim and, which is even more demeaning, the DNA profile of the victim herself. This was admitted in the House of Lords. So why is the British public so lacking in interest or apparently not in the least bit bothered by this staggering lack of feeling for the innocent? There is no mechanism for the removal of a DNA sample from the database after consent has been given. It is of interest here that both the police, forensic scientists and politicians are extremely reluctant to give a sample which can be held on the named database. Why is this? Fear? Fear of what may be done with such intimate information. This includes medical analysis and data which they have no right to access. It would be." In Genetics and DNA Technology: Legal Aspects, 109. Routledge-Cavendish, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781843146995-17.

Zhiming, Liu, Wang Cheng, and Li Jiang. "Solving Constrained Optimization via a Modified Genetic Particle Swarm Optimization." In 1st International ICST Conference on Forensic Applications and Techniques in Telecommunications, Information and Multimedia. ACM, 2008. http://dx.doi.org/10.4108/wkdd.2008.2663.