Kliknij ten link, aby zobaczyć inne rodzaje publikacji na ten temat: Janssen.
Artykuły w czasopismach na temat „Janssen”
Utwórz poprawne odniesienie w stylach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard i wielu innych
Sprawdź 50 najlepszych artykułów w czasopismach naukowych na temat „Janssen”.
Przycisk „Dodaj do bibliografii” jest dostępny obok każdej pracy w bibliografii. Użyj go – a my automatycznie utworzymy odniesienie bibliograficzne do wybranej pracy w stylu cytowania, którego potrzebujesz: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver itp.
Możesz również pobrać pełny tekst publikacji naukowej w formacie „.pdf” i przeczytać adnotację do pracy online, jeśli odpowiednie parametry są dostępne w metadanych.
Przeglądaj artykuły w czasopismach z różnych dziedzin i twórz odpowiednie bibliografie.
1
Alphs, Larry. "JANSSEN". Schizophrenia Research 136 (kwiecień 2012): S60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0920-9964(12)70222-0.
Pełny tekst źródła
2
Watson, R. "Paul Janssen". BMJ 327, nr 7426 (29.11.2003): 1290. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/bmj.327.7426.1290.
Pełny tekst źródła
3
Oransky, Ivan. "Paul Janssen". Lancet 363, nr 9404 (styczeń 2004): 251. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0140-6736(03)15357-3.
Pełny tekst źródła
4
Bruntink, Rob. "Daisy Janssen". Pallium 19, nr 1 (luty 2017): 30–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12479-017-0015-3.
Pełny tekst źródła
5
Launay, Françoise, i Peter D. Hingley. "Jules Janssen's ‘Revolver Photographique’ and its British Derivative, ‘the Janssen Slide’". Journal for the History of Astronomy 36, nr 1 (luty 2005): 57–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002182860503600107.
Pełny tekst źródła
6
&NA;. "Janssen??s risperidone". Inpharma Weekly &NA;, nr 836 (maj 1992): 9. http://dx.doi.org/10.2165/00128413-199208360-00012.
Pełny tekst źródła
7
Janssen, Rosalind. "Rosalind Janssen reviews". Journal of the Institute of Conservation 43, nr 2 (3.05.2020): 189–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/19455224.2020.1765594.
Pełny tekst źródła
8
Coates, L. C., E. Soriano, N. Corp, H. Bertheussen, K. Callis-Duffin, C. Barbosa Campanholo, J. Chau i in. "OP0229 THE GROUP FOR RESEARCH AND ASSESSMENT OF PSORIASIS AND PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS (GRAPPA) TREATMENT RECOMMENDATIONS 2021". Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 80, Suppl 1 (19.05.2021): 139–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-eular.4091.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
Background:Since the 2015 GRAPPA treatment recommendations were published, therapeutic options and management strategies for psoriatic arthritis (PsA) have advanced considerably.Objectives:The goal of the GRAPPA recommendations update is to develop high quality, evidence-based recommendations for the treatment of PsA, including related conditions and comorbidities.Methods:GRAPPA rheumatologists, dermatologists and patient research partners (PRPs) updated overarching principles for the management of adults with PsA by consensus. Principles considering use of biosimilars and tapering/discontinuing of therapy were added to this update. Systematic literature searches based on data publicly available from three databases (MEDLINE, EMBASE, and Cochrane CENTRAL) were conducted from the end of the previous recommendations’ searches through August 2020. Additional abstract searches were performed for conference presentations in 2017-2020. Searches covered PsA treatments (peripheral arthritis, axial arthritis, enthesitis, dactylitis, skin, and nail disease). Additional searches were performed for related conditions (uveitis and IBD) and comorbidities evaluating their impact on safety and treatment outcomes. Individual groups assessed the risk of bias and applied the GRADE system to generate strong or conditional recommendations for therapies within the domain groups and for the management of comorbidities and related conditions. These recommendations were then incorporated into an overall treatment schema.Results:Updated, evidence-based treatment recommendations are shown (Table 1). Since 2015, many new medications have been incorporated. Additional results for older medications, such as methotrexate, have been published across PsA domains. Based on the evidence, the treatment recommendations developed by individual groups were incorporated into the overall schema including principles for management of arthritis, spondylitis, enthesitis, dactylitis, skin, and nail disease in PsA, and associated conditions (Figure 1). Choice of therapy for an individual should ideally address all of the domains that impact on that patient, supporting shared decision making with the patient involved. Additional consideration in the recommendations was given to key associated conditions and comorbidities as these often impact on therapy choice.Conclusion:These GRAPPA treatment recommendations provide up to date, evidence-based guidance to providers who manage and treat adult patients with PsA. These recommendations are based on domain-based strategy for PsA and supplemented by overarching principles developed by consensus of GRAPPA members.IndicationStrongForConditional ForConditionalAgainstStrongAgainstInsufficient evidencePeripheral Arthritis DMARD NaïvecsDMARDs, TNFi, PDE4i, IL-12/23i, IL-17i, IL-23i, JAKiNSAIDs, oral CS, IA CS,IL-6i,Peripheral Arthritis DMARD IRTNFi, IL-12/23i, IL-17i, IL-23i, JAKiPDE4i, other csDMARD, NSAIDs, oral CS, IA CS,IL-6i,Peripheral ArthritisbDMARD IRTNFi, IL-17i, IL-23i, JAKi,NSAIDs, oral CS, IA CS, IL-12/23i, PDE4i, CTLA-4-IgIL-6i,Axial arthritis, Biologic NaïveNSAIDs, Physiotherapy, simple analgesia, TNFi, IL-17i, JAKiCS SIJ injections, bisphosphonatescsDMARDs, IL-6i,IL-12/23i, IL-23iAxial PsA, Biologic IRNSAIDs, Physiotherapy, simple analgesia, TNFi, IL-17i, JAKi csDMARDs, IL-6i,IL-12/23i, IL-23iEnthesitisTNFi, IL-12/23i, IL-17i, PDE4i, IL-23i, JAKiNSAIDs, physiotherapy, CS injections, MTXIL-6i,Other csDMARDsDactylitisTNFi IL-12/23i, IL-17i, IL-23i, JAKi, PDE4iNSAIDs, CS injections, MTXOther csDMARDsPsoriasisTopicals, phototherapy, csDMARDs, TNFi, IL-12/23i, IL-17i, IL-23i, PDE4i, JAKi AcitretinNail psoriasisTNFi, IL12/23i, IL17i, IL23i, PDE4iTopical CS, tacrolimus and calcipotriol combination or individual therapies, Pulsed dye laser, csDMARDs, acitretin, JAKiTopical Cyclosporine / Tazarotene, Fumarate, Fumaric Acid Esters, UVA and UVB Phototherapy, AlitretinoinIBDTNFi (not ETN), IL-12/23i, JAKiIL-17iUveitisTNFi (not ETN)Disclosure of Interests:Laura C Coates Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Celgene, Gilead, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Medac, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Pfizer, and Novartis, Enrique Soriano Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb,GSK, Genzyme, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb,GSK, Genzyme, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, Sanofi, UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Janssen, Novartis Pharma, Pfizer, Roche, and UCB, Nadia Corp: None declared, Heidi Bertheussen Consultant of: Pfizer, Kristina Callis-Duffin Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Sienna Biopharmaceuticals, Stiefel Laboratories, UCB, Ortho Dermatologics, Inc, Regeneron Pharmaceuticals, Inc., Anaptys Bio, Boehringer Ingelheim., Cristiano Barbosa Campanholo Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, and UCB, Jeffrey Chau: None declared, Lihi Eder Consultant of: Abbvie, UCB, Janssen, Eli Lily, Pfizer, Novartis, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, UCB, Janssen, Eli Lily, Pfizer, Novartis, Daniel Fernandez Consultant of: Abbvie, UCB, Roche, Janssen, Pfizer, Amgen and Brystol, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, UCB, Roche, Janssen, Pfizer, Amgen and Brystol, Oliver FitzGerald Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Janssen and Pfizer Inc, Consultant of: BMS, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen and Pfizer Inc, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, BMS, Eli Lilly, Novartis and Pfizer Inc, Amit Garg Consultant of: Abbvie, Amgen, Asana Biosciences, Bristol Myers Squibb, Boehringer Ingelheim, Incyte, InflaRx, Janssen, Pfizer, UCB, Viela Biosciences, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Dafna D Gladman Consultant of: Abbvie, Amgen, BMS, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead, Jansen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Jansen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB, Niti Goel: None declared, Suzanne Grieb: None declared, Philip Helliwell Speakers bureau: Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Consultant of: Eli Lilly, M Elaine Husni Consultant of: Abbvie, Amgen, Janssen, Novartis, Lilly, UCB, Regeneron, and Pfizer, Deepak Jadon Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Healthcare Celltrion, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Healthcare Celltrion, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Gilead, Healthcare Celltrion, Janssen, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Sandoz, UCB, Arnon Katz: None declared, Dhruvkumar Laheru: None declared, John Latella: None declared, Ying Ying Leung Speakers bureau: Novartis, AbbVie, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Consultant of: Pfizer and Boehringer Ingelheim, Grant/research support from: Pfizer and conference support from AbbVie, Christine Lindsay Shareholder of: Amgen, Employee of: Aurinia pharmaceuticals, Ennio Lubrano Speakers bureau: Alfa-Sigma, Abbvie, Galapagos, Janssen Cilag, Lilly., Consultant of: Alfa-Sigma, Abbvie, Galapagos, Janssen Cilag, Lilly., Luis Mazzuoccolo Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Amgen, Novartis, Elli Lilly, Jansen, Consultant of: Abbvie, Amgen, Novartis, Elli Lilly, Jansen, Roland McDonald: None declared, Philip J Mease Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer and UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Boehringer Ingelheim, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead Sciences, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, SUN and UCB, Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Galapagos, Gilead Sciences, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, SUN and UCB, Denis O’Sullivan: None declared, Alexis Ogdie Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Celgene, Corrona, Gilead, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, and Pfizer, Grant/research support from: Novartis and Pfizer and Amgen, Wendy Olsder: None declared, Lori Schick: None declared, Ingrid Steinkoenig: None declared, Maarten de Wit Consultant of: AbbVie, BMS, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Roche, Danielle van der Windt: None declared, Arthur Kavanaugh Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Eli Lilly, Gilead Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, BMS, Eli Lilly, Gilead Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB
9
Nema, Kasmir. "Intercultural Communication in the Life and Mission of Arnold Janssen". Jurnal Teologi 9, nr 2 (30.11.2020): 187–206. http://dx.doi.org/10.24071/jt.v9i02.2620.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
This study investigates the intercultural communication dimension of the life and mission of Arnold Janssen, the founder of the Divine Word Missionaries (SVD). This qualitative study involves a textual analysis of the relevant data and verbal descriptions of Janssen’s life and mission. The results of the study show that the seed of Janssen’s intercultural communication was primarily rooted in his parents. Being born in a family that was enveloped by a culture of prayer and a culture of peace, Janssen cultivated an intercultural sensitivity. This seed sprouted in his personality and spirituality. It revealed that Janssen was an intercultural-and-receptive person, interested in ethnic groups, cultures, beliefs, and nationalities which were different from his own. Such interests were founded by a venturesome spirit that allowed him to welcome the unfamiliarity of the other and to value such differences. The researcher finds that Janssen’s intercultural communication was contained in his practice of mission as dialogue. Through the lenses of the mission, Janssen’s dialogue competence enabled him to bridge differing views about the mission and encourage missionaries to do the same.
10
Thorens, Louison, Knut Jørgen Måløy, Mickaël Bourgoin i Stéphane Santucci. "Taming the Janssen effect". EPJ Web of Conferences 249 (2021): 08004. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/epjconf/202124908004.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
We investigate both experimentally and theoretically the apparent mass of a ferromagnetic granular assembly filling a cylindrical container and submitted to a magnetic field B, aligned vertically along the silo. We show that the mass of the ferromagnetic granular column depends strongly on the applied magnetic field. Notably, our measurements deviate strongly from the exponential saturation of the measured mass as a function of the true mass of the grain packing, as predicted by Janssen [H.A. Janssen, Vereins Eutscher Ingenieure Zeitschrift, 1045 (1895)]. In particular, the measured mass of tall columns decreases systematically as the amplitude of the magnetic field increases. We rationalize our experimental findings by considering the induced magnetic dipole-dipole interactions within the whole packing. We show the emergence of a global magnetic radial force along the walls of the silos, fully determined by the external magnetic field. The resulting tunable frictional interactions allows a full control of the effective mass of the ferromagnetic granular column.
11
VERVENNE, Marc &. POLLEFEYT. "Arthur Janssen-Prijs 1998". Ethische Perspectieven 8, nr 3 (2.06.2005): 262–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.2143/epn.8.3.563131.
Pełny tekst źródła
12
Janssen, Robert S., Ronald O. Valdiserri, Melissa Shepherd i Kevin De Cock. "JANSSEN ET AL. RESPOND". American Journal of Public Health 92, nr 3 (marzec 2002): 332–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.2105/ajph.92.3.332.
Pełny tekst źródła
13
&NA;. "???are refuted by Janssen". Inpharma Weekly &NA;, nr 778 (marzec 1991): 6. http://dx.doi.org/10.2165/00128413-199107780-00016.
Pełny tekst źródła
14
MacConnachie, A. M. "Fentanyl transdermal (Durogesic, Janssen)". Intensive and Critical Care Nursing 11, nr 6 (grudzień 1995): 360–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0964-3397(95)80488-9.
Pełny tekst źródła
15
Chast, Fr. "Paul Janssen (1926-2003)". Annales Pharmaceutiques Françaises 62, nr 4 (lipiec 2004): 274–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0003-4509(04)94313-1.
Pełny tekst źródła
16
Uffink, Jos, Dennis Dieks, Janneke van Lith i Geurt Sengers. "In Memoriam Hanneke Janssen". Studies in History and Philosophy of Science Part B: Studies in History and Philosophy of Modern Physics 39, nr 4 (listopad 2008): 917–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.shpsb.2008.11.001.
Pełny tekst źródła
17
Souvignier, Bernd. "Ted Janssen (1936–2017)". Acta Crystallographica Section A Foundations and Advances 74, nr 4 (6.06.2018): 403–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/s2053273318007088.
Pełny tekst źródła
18
van Vlijmen, Herman, Renee L. Desjarlais i Tara Mirzadegan. "Computational chemistry at Janssen". Journal of Computer-Aided Molecular Design 31, nr 3 (19.12.2016): 267–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10822-016-9998-9.
Pełny tekst źródła
19
Laura Howes. "Nanobiotix partners with Janssen". C&EN Global Enterprise 101, nr 23 (17.07.2023): 9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1021/cen-10123-buscon15.
Pełny tekst źródła
20
Smolen, J. S., S. Siebert, T. Korotaeva, P. Bergmans, K. De Vlam, E. Gremese, B. Joven-Ibáñez i in. "FRI0362 COMPARATIVE EFFECTIVENESS OF USTEKINUMAB (UST) AND TNF INHIBITORS (TNFI) IN PATIENTS WITH PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS (PSA) IN THE REAL-WORLD, MULTINATIONAL PSABIO STUDY: 12-MONTH FOLLOW-UP". Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 79, Suppl 1 (czerwiec 2020): 778–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-eular.2755.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
Background:Among treatment options for PsA, IL-12/23 inhibition with UST was the first new biologic mode of action after TNFi. Few real-world data comparing UST with TNFi are available.Objectives:Comparison of UST and TNFi treatment effectiveness within the prospectively followed PsABio cohort at 12-month (mo) follow-up.Methods:The PsABio study (NCT02627768) evaluates effectiveness, tolerability and persistence of 1st, 2nd or 3rd-line UST or TNFi in PsA. Proportions of patients (pts) reaching MDA/very low disease activity (VLDA) and clinical Disease Activity index for PSoriatic Arthritis (cDAPSA) LDA/remission are described. Comparison across UST and TNFi cohorts was done on last observation carried forward up to 12 (±3) mo, with non-response imputation for pts who had stopped/switched initial treatment. Logistic regression analysis was used, including propensity score (PS) analysis to adjust for imbalanced prognostic baseline (BL) covariates: country, age, sex, BMI, smoking (yes/no), comorbidities (cardiovascular/metabolic syndrome), PsA type (axial, polyarticular, oligoarticular), psoriasis body surface area (BSA), disease duration, cDAPSA, 12-item PsA Impact of Disease (PsAID-12), dactylitis, enthesitis, Fibromyalgia Rapid Screening Tool (FiRST) score, line of biologic (b)DMARD, synthetic DMARD use, and steroid or NSAID use.Results:Of 929 eligible pts, 893 had evaluable data at BL and at follow-up; 438 (95.6%) were treated with UST and 455 (96.6%) with TNFi (including stoppers/switchers). UST and TNFi groups had BL differences in mean age (51.0 vs 48.5 years, respectively), concurrent comorbidities (68.7% vs 60.9%), time since diagnosis (7.5 vs 6.2 years), line of treatment (1st-line 45.0% vs 55.2%; 3rd-line 20.5% vs 12.1%), NSAID use (54.8% vs 68.8%), concomitant MTX use (29.9% vs 42.0%) and psoriasis skin involvement (BSA >10% in 26.6% vs 14.8%).In 714 pts with available data, mean (standard deviation) BL cDAPSA was 30.6 (20.2; n=358) for UST and 29.3 (18.6; n=356) for TNFi. Observed data showed differences in proportion of pts achieving MDA/VLDA and cDAPSA LDA/remission in favour of TNFi, but after PS adjustment for BL differences (such as line of therapy, skin psoriasis, concomitant conventional DMARD, etc.), odds ratios for reaching targets at 12 mo did not significantly differ between UST and TNFi groups (Fig. 1).Comparison of 6- and 12-mo unadjusted data showed sustained MDA/VLDA responses with both UST (21.8%) and TNFi (29.5%), with comparable proportions of additional pts achieving these targets between 6 and 12 mo (17.0% and 20.3%, respectively). Sustained efficacy became lower with successive lines of treatment (data not shown).Conclusion:Various factors, including patient characteristics such as comorbidities, influence the physician’s selection of treatment modality for patients needing a bDMARD. Our real-world results demonstrate differences in observed clinical effectiveness between UST and TNFi. However, after PS adjustment for a number of BL differences, clinical results at 12 mo were comparable between UST and TNFi groups. Data at 12 mo also show sustained response with both UST and TNFi treatment, as well as a similar rate of pts achieving targets after 6 to 12 mo of treatment.Acknowledgments:This study was funded by Janssen.Disclosure of Interests:Josef S. Smolen Grant/research support from: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Celltrion, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Gilead, ILTOO, Janssen, Novartis-Sandoz, Pfizer Inc, Samsung, Sanofi, Consultant of: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Celltrion, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Gilead, ILTOO, Janssen, Novartis-Sandoz, Pfizer Inc, Samsung, Sanofi, Stefan Siebert Grant/research support from: BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Celgene, Janssen, Novartis, Tatiana Korotaeva Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Consultant of: Abbvie, BIOCAD, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Novartis-Sandoz, Pfizer, UCB, Speakers bureau: Abbvie, BIOCAD, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Novartis-Sandoz, Pfizer, UCB, Paul Bergmans Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen, Kurt de Vlam Consultant of: Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB – consultant, Speakers bureau: Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB – speakers bureau and honoraria, Elisa Gremese Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Sanofi, UCB, Roche, Pfizer, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Sanofi, UCB, Roche, Pfizer, Beatriz Joven-Ibáñez Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Celgene, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Wim Noel Employee of: Janssen Pharmaceuticals NV, Michael T Nurmohamed Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celltrion, GlaxoSmithKline, Jansen, Eli Lilly, Menarini, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mundipharma, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, USB, Consultant of: Abbvie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celltrion, GlaxoSmithKline, Jansen, Eli Lilly, Menarini, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mundipharma, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, USB, Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celltrion, GlaxoSmithKline, Jansen, Eli Lilly, Menarini, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mundipharma, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, USB, Petros Sfikakis Grant/research support from: Grant/research support from Abvie, Novartis, MSD, Actelion, Amgen, Pfizer, Janssen Pharmaceutical, UCB, Elke Theander Employee of: Janssen-Cilag Sweden AB, Laure Gossec Grant/research support from: Lilly, Mylan, Pfizer, Sandoz, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, Sanofi-Aventis, UCB
21
Gossec, L., S. Siebert, P. Bergmans, K. De Vlam, E. Gremese, B. Joven-Ibáñez, T. Korotaeva i in. "SAT0398 PERSISTENCE OF USTEKINUMAB (UST) OR TNF INHIBITOR (TNFI) TREATMENT IN PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS (PsA): INSIGHTS FROM THE LARGE, PROSPECTIVE, MULTINATIONAL, REAL-WORLD PsABio COHORT". Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 79, Suppl 1 (czerwiec 2020): 1149–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-eular.2127.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
Background:Several biologic DMARDs (bDMARDs) exist for PsA, TNFi and UST being the earliest on European markets. When bDMARDs are insufficiently effective, later-line bDMARDs typically have shorter persistence. Treatment persistence reflects a mix of effectiveness and adverse events (AEs), and persistence data are limited in PsA.Objectives:Comparative analysis of 1-year persistence of UST and TNFi within the prospective PsABio cohort.Methods:PsABio is an observational, multinational study of PsA patients (pts) treated with 1st to 3rd line UST or TNFi at their rheumatologist’s discretion.1Treatment persistence (up to 15 months of follow-up) was defined as time between start of first bDMARD treatment in PsABio, and either stop or switch to another bDMARD, or withdrawal.Persistence of UST and TNFi is shown by Kaplan-Meier curves and compared using Cox regression analysis, with propensity score (PS) to adjust for baseline imbalanced demographic and disease-related covariates (age, sex, bDMARD line, BMI, Clinical Disease Activity index for PSoriatic Arthritis [cDAPSA], 12-item PsA Impact of Disease [PsAID-12], Fibromyalgia Rapid Screening Tool [FiRST] score, co-treatments with MTX, NSAIDs, glucocorticoids, cardiovascular/metabolic comorbidities, dactylitis, enthesitis and body surface area [BSA]). Factors including concomitant MTX use and skin involvement: <3%, 3–10% and >10%, were added to the Cox model to investigate their impact on the PS-adjusted treatment effect.Results:Of 438 and 455 pts who started UST and TNF, respectively, 121 (28%) and 134 (29%) stopped or switched treatment before Month 15, with differences (as expected) according to treatment line (Fig. 1a, b). Reasons for stop/switch were related to safety/AEs in 12% (UST) and 28% (TNFi), and effectiveness (joints, nails or skin) in 77% (UST) and 69% (TNFi) of pts.The observed mean time on drug was 397 days for UST and 385 days for TNFi pts (1st line 410/397 days, 2nd 390/382 days, 3rd 381/338 days). Fig. 1b shows similar persistence for all drugs and treatment lines, except for lower persistence in TNFi 3rd line vs 1st/2nd. In PS-adjusted Cox analysis, no statistically significant difference between UST and TNFi persistence was seen; hazard ratio (HR; 95% CI) for stop/switch bDMARD (UST vs TNFi) was 0.82 (0.60, 1.13). In the model, bDMARD monotherapy (without MTX) and extensive skin involvement (BSA >10%), showed significantly better persistence for UST (HR 0.61 [0.42, 0.90] and 0.41 [0.19, 0.89] respectively; unadjusted Kaplan-Meier graphs shown in Fig. 1c, d). MTX co-therapy and low BSA did not affect the PS-adjusted treatment effect. Other factors added to the PS-adjusted Cox model did not show significant effects.Conclusion:In this real-world PsA cohort undergoing bDMARD treatment, persistence was generally comparable for UST and TNFi, but some clinical situations led to better drug persistence with UST compared to TNFi – particularly monotherapy, more extensive skin involvement, and in 3rd-line treatment. Our data emphasise the importance of skin involvement for pts with PsA.References:[1]Gossec L, et al.Ann Rheum Dis. 2018;77(suppl 2):Abstract AB0928Acknowledgments:This study was funded by Janssen.Disclosure of Interests:Laure Gossec Grant/research support from: Lilly, Mylan, Pfizer, Sandoz, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, Sanofi-Aventis, UCB, Stefan Siebert Grant/research support from: BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Celgene, Janssen, Novartis, Paul Bergmans Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen, Kurt de Vlam Consultant of: Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB – consultant, Speakers bureau: Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB – speakers bureau and honoraria, Elisa Gremese Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Sanofi, UCB, Roche, Pfizer, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Sanofi, UCB, Roche, Pfizer, Beatriz Joven-Ibáñez Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Celgene, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Tatiana Korotaeva Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Consultant of: Abbvie, BIOCAD, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Novartis-Sandoz, Pfizer, UCB, Speakers bureau: Abbvie, BIOCAD, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Novartis-Sandoz, Pfizer, UCB, Wim Noel Employee of: Janssen Pharmaceuticals NV, Michael T Nurmohamed Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celltrion, GlaxoSmithKline, Jansen, Eli Lilly, Menarini, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mundipharma, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, USB, Consultant of: Abbvie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celltrion, GlaxoSmithKline, Jansen, Eli Lilly, Menarini, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mundipharma, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, USB, Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celltrion, GlaxoSmithKline, Jansen, Eli Lilly, Menarini, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mundipharma, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, USB, Petros Sfikakis Grant/research support from: Grant/research support from Abvie, Novartis, MSD, Actelion, Amgen, Pfizer, Janssen Pharmaceutical, UCB, Elke Theander Employee of: Janssen-Cilag Sweden AB, Josef S. Smolen Grant/research support from: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Celltrion, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Gilead, ILTOO, Janssen, Novartis-Sandoz, Pfizer Inc, Samsung, Sanofi, Consultant of: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Celltrion, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Gilead, ILTOO, Janssen, Novartis-Sandoz, Pfizer Inc, Samsung, Sanofi
22
Nurmohamed, M. T., I. Van der Horst-Bruinsma, A. W. Van Kuijk, S. Siebert, P. Bergmans, K. De Vlam, E. Gremese i in. "SAT0432 EFFECT OF SEX ON DISEASE CHARACTERISTICS AND DISEASE IMPACT IN PATIENTS WITH PSORIATIC ARTHRITIS (PsA): INSIGHTS FROM THE REAL-WORLD, OBSERVATIONAL MULTINATIONAL PsABio COHORT". Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 79, Suppl 1 (czerwiec 2020): 1171.1–1173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-eular.2771.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
Background:Female sex has been associated with more severe disease and poorer treatment outcomes in PsA. These observations are often based on small populations or national cohorts/registries.Objectives:To investigate the effects of sex on disease characteristics and disease impact in PsA, using data of 929 consecutive patients (pts) from PsABio.Methods:PsABio is a real-world, non-interventional European study in PsA pts treated with UST or TNFi based on their rheumatologist’s choice. Observed male and female baseline (BL) data were described and compared using 95% CI.Results:Women in PsABio (n=512 [55%]) were numerically older than men (mean [SD]: 50.5 [12.7] / 48.7 [12.3] years, respectively). Women were more obese (BMI >30), % (95% CI): F: 35 (30, 39), M: 24 (20, 29), men more overweight (BMI >25–30): F: 31 (27, 36), M:51 (46, 57). Age at diagnosis, delay from first symptom to diagnosis, and disease duration were similar for both sexes.Women entered PsABio more often on 3rd line treatment, whereas men started on 1st-line biologic treatment more often (F/M 1st line 47%/55%; 2nd line 34%/33%; 3rd line 20%/12%). Numerically, concomitant MTX was given more often to women vs men (32% vs 27%). At BL, 60% of women and 64% of men were on NSAIDs; 7.9% and 2.5% on antidepressant drugs. Women had significantly more comorbidities, with numerically more cardiovascular disease and anxiety/depression, and 3 times more IBD.Women had significantly higher 68 tender joint counts (TJC): 13.0 vs 10.4, while 66 swollen joint counts were not significantly different: 5.8 vs 5.5. Axial or combined axial-peripheral disease was similarly frequent, in 29% of women and 26% of men (Figs. 1, 2).Clinical Disease Activity index for PSoriatic Arthritis (cDAPSA) was higher in women (31.8 vs 27.3); pt-reported levels of pain, global disease activity (VAS scales) and higher TJC contributed to this. While enthesitis prevalence (based on Leeds Enthesitis Index) was comparable, men had significantly more frequent dactylitis, nail disease and worse skin psoriasis. At BL, 3.4% of women vs 7.1% of men, were in MDA.Regarding physical functioning (HAQ-DI), impact of disease (PSAID-12) and quality of life (EQ5D-3L health state), women with PsA starting a biologic (b)DMARD, expressed significantly greater negative impact and more limitations due to their disease (Fig. 2).Conclusion:In routine care, women with PsA starting a bDMARD presented with worse outcomes over a range of assessments compared with men (higher pt-reported pain and disease activity, TJC, and worse physical functioning and QoL), while men had worse dactylitis and psoriasis. Follow-up analysis will report whether the effects of biologic therapy are different in both sexes. The increased prevalence of associated features related to pain and impact on functioning and QoL may indicate the need for a more comprehensive treatment approach for women to avoid unnecessary and premature bDMARD stop or switch.Acknowledgments:This study was funded by Janssen.Disclosure of Interests:Michael T Nurmohamed Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celltrion, GlaxoSmithKline, Jansen, Eli Lilly, Menarini, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mundipharma, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, USB, Consultant of: Abbvie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celltrion, GlaxoSmithKline, Jansen, Eli Lilly, Menarini, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mundipharma, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, USB, Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celltrion, GlaxoSmithKline, Jansen, Eli Lilly, Menarini, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Mundipharma, Pfizer, Roche, Sanofi, USB, Irene van der Horst-Bruinsma Grant/research support from: AbbVie, Novartis, Eli Lilly, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Pfizer, UCB Pharma, Consultant of: AbbVie, Novartis, Eli Lilly, Bristol-Myers Squibb, MSD, Pfizer, UCB Pharma, Arno WR van Kuijk Grant/research support from: Janssen, Stefan Siebert Grant/research support from: BMS, Boehringer Ingelheim, Celgene, GlaxoSmithKline, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Consultant of: AbbVie, Boehringer Ingelheim, Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Celgene, Janssen, Novartis, Paul Bergmans Shareholder of: Johnson & Johnson, Employee of: Janssen, Kurt de Vlam Consultant of: Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB – consultant, Speakers bureau: Celgene Corporation, Eli Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, UCB – speakers bureau and honoraria, Elisa Gremese Consultant of: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Sanofi, UCB, Roche, Pfizer, Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Sanofi, UCB, Roche, Pfizer, Beatriz Joven-Ibáñez Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Celgene, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Pfizer, Tatiana Korotaeva Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Consultant of: Abbvie, BIOCAD, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Novartis-Sandoz, Pfizer, UCB, Speakers bureau: Abbvie, BIOCAD, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Celgene, Eli Lilly, Janssen, Merck Sharp & Dohme, Novartis, Novartis-Sandoz, Pfizer, UCB, Wim Noel Employee of: Janssen Pharmaceuticals NV, Petros Sfikakis Grant/research support from: Grant/research support from Abvie, Novartis, MSD, Actelion, Amgen, Pfizer, Janssen Pharmaceutical, UCB, Elke Theander Employee of: Janssen-Cilag Sweden AB, Josef S. Smolen Grant/research support from: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Celltrion, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Gilead, ILTOO, Janssen, Novartis-Sandoz, Pfizer Inc, Samsung, Sanofi, Consultant of: AbbVie, AstraZeneca, Celgene, Celltrion, Chugai, Eli Lilly, Gilead, ILTOO, Janssen, Novartis-Sandoz, Pfizer Inc, Samsung, Sanofi, Laure Gossec Grant/research support from: Lilly, Mylan, Pfizer, Sandoz, Consultant of: AbbVie, Amgen, Biogen, Celgene, Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, Sandoz, Sanofi-Aventis, UCB
23
Gattaz, Wagner F., i Orestes V. Forlenza. "Dr. Paul Janssen (1926-2003)". Archives of Clinical Psychiatry (São Paulo) 30, nr 6 (2003): 189–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/s0101-60832003000600001.
Pełny tekst źródła
24
Trémine, Thierry. "1rebiennale Janssen-Cilag en psychiatrie". L'information psychiatrique 83, nr 7 (2007): 611. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/inpsy.8307.0611.
Pełny tekst źródła
25
Schmid, Wolfgang. "WILHELM JANSSEN: Kleine Rheinische Geschichte". Annalen des Historischen Vereins für den Niederrhein 201, jg (grudzień 1998): 257–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.7788/annalen-1998-jg09.
Pełny tekst źródła
26
Vicari, Fernand. "Docteur Paul Janssen 1926-2003". Hegel N° 1, nr 1 (2013): 62. http://dx.doi.org/10.4267/2042/49212.
Pełny tekst źródła
27
Vicari, Fernand. "Docteur Paul Janssen 1926-2003". Hegel N° 1, nr 1 (1.01.2013): 62–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/heg.031.0062.
Pełny tekst źródła
28
&NA;. "A new antirhinoviral from Janssen". Inpharma Weekly &NA;, nr 826 (luty 1992): 5. http://dx.doi.org/10.2165/00128413-199208260-00006.
Pełny tekst źródła
29
de Boissieu, Marc. "Ted Janssen and aperiodic crystals". Acta Crystallographica Section A Foundations and Advances 75, nr 2 (6.02.2019): 273–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1107/s2053273318016765.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
This article reviews some of Ted Janssen's (1936–2017) major contributions to the field of aperiodic crystals. Aperiodic crystals are long-range ordered structures without 3D lattice translations and encompass incommensurately modulated phases, incommensurate composites and quasicrystals. Together with Pim de Wolff and Aloysio Janner, Ted Janssen invented the very elegant theory of superspace crystallography that, by adding a supplementary dimension to the usual 3D space, allows for a deeper understanding of the atomic structure of aperiodic crystals. He also made important contributions to the understanding of the stability and dynamics of aperiodic crystals, exploring their fascinating physical properties. He constantly interacted and collaborated with experimentalists, always ready to share and explain his detailed understanding of aperiodic crystals.
30
ㅤ. "Janssen / Gooren (TvAR 1993/4665)". Tijdschrift voor Agrarisch Recht 53, nr 12 (1.12.1993): ㅤ. http://dx.doi.org/10.5117/tvar1993.12.005.
Pełny tekst źródła
31
ㅤ. "Janssen / Gooren (TvAR 1998/4921)". Tijdschrift voor Agrarisch Recht 58, nr 7 (1.07.1998): ㅤ. http://dx.doi.org/10.5117/tvar1998.7-8.015.
Pełny tekst źródła
32
Canales, Jimena. "Book Review: Rehabilitating Janssen, Un Globe-Trotter de la Physique Céleste: L'astronome Jules Janssen". Journal for the History of Astronomy 40, nr 2 (maj 2009): 233–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/002182860904000217.
Pełny tekst źródła
33
Queiro Silva, R., I. Belinchón, A. Lopez-Ferrer, M. Ferran I Farrés, R. Rivera Díaz, D. Vidal Sarro, L. Rodriguez Freire i in. "POS1075 CROSS-SECTIONAL OBSERVATIONAL AND MULTICENTER STUDY FOR THE VALIDATION OF THE SPANISH VERSION OF THE PURE-4 QUESTIONNAIRE". Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 81, Suppl 1 (23.05.2022): 862–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2022-eular.2040.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
BackgroundThe Psoriatic arthritis UnclutteRed screening Evaluation (PURE-4) has been culturally adapted to Spanish language recently following the standardized methodology.1 A group of experts in psoriasis and psoriatic arthritis (PsA) has recently recommended the use of the Spanish version of PURE-4 due to the reduced number of items, its high sensitivity and specificity and the feasibility to implement in the clinical practice.ObjectivesTo validate the Spanish version of the PURE-4 questionnaire.MethodsCross-sectional, observational and multicenter study conducted with primary data collection under conditions of routine clinical practice in Spain. The study included adult patients with diagnosis of psoriasis of any time of evolution and any type of severity, that voluntarily accepted to participate. Primary endpoint: validation of PURE-4 questionnaire in terms of sensitivity, specificity, feasibility, reliability (internal consistency) and construct validity. The study consists in two cross-sectional evaluations: assessment I (a visit performed by a dermatologist, followed by an independent visit to the rheumatologist within the following 4 weeks after to the dermatologist’s visit and scheduled according to routine clinical practice) and assessment II (patients without PsA in assessment I will be evaluated by the rheumatologist one year ±2 months later and the rheumatologist will perform the PsA diagnostic confirmation according to the rheumatologist criteria and will collect clinical characteristics). Since data from assessment II are not yet available, data from assessment I are presented.Results268 evaluable patients included, 57.1% male, with a mean (SD) age of 47.1 (12.6) years, a mean (SD) time from diagnosis of 18.6 (12.9) years and mostly receiving psoriasis treatment (88.8%), biological treatment being the most common (43.3%). Mean (SD) PURE-4 score for all patients was 1.4 (1.3), being 2.3 (1.1) for patients with PsA and 1.3 (1.3) for patients without PsA diagnosis (Table 1). 268 (100.0%) patients answered the full PURE-4 questionnaire. Area under the receiver-operating characteristic (ROC) curve was 0.7185 (95% CI: 0.6391, 0.7978), showing good quality of fit or quality of the questionnaire (Figure 1). Using the Youden index, which determines the optimal cut-off point for the classification of patients, it was identified that a score ≥2 indicated a diagnosis of PsA. PURE-4 questionnaire showed a sensitivity of 77.1% and a specificity of 61.1%.Table 1.Sociodemographic and clinical baseline characteristics (assessment I)CharacteristicsWith PsA diagnosis (n=35)Without PsA diagnosis (n=226)Not assesable (n=7)Total (n=268)Age, mean (SD)50.5 (10.0)46.5 (12.9)49.9 (11.2)47.1 (12.6)Female, n (%)14 (40.0%)97 (42.9%)4 (57.1%)115 (42.9%)Years since diagnosis, mean (SD)19.7 (14.2)18.3 (12.8)22.4 (9.0)18.6 (12.9)Current treatment for psoriasis, n (%)32 (91.4%)199 (88.1%)7 (100.0%)238 (88.8%)Phototherapy, n (%)5 (15.6%)16 (8.0%)0 (0.0%)21 (8.8%)Topic treatment, n (%)20 (62.5%)66 (33.2%)3 (42.9%)89 (37.4%)Conventional systemic no biological treatment, n (%)7 (21.9%)40 (20.1%)2 (28.6%)49 (20.6%)Biological treatment, n (%)8 (25.0%)91 (45.7%)4 (57.1%)103 (43.3%)Phosphodiesterase-4 inhibitors, n (%)0 (0.0%)8 (4.0%)0 (0.0%)8 (3.4%)Others, n (%)0 (0.0%)3 (1.5%)0 (0.0%)3 (1.3%)PASI, mean (SD)8.7 (5.5)7.0 (5.0)4.2 (3.1)7.2 (5.1)Mild (PASI<7), n (%)11 (31.4%)95 (42.0%)5 (71.4%)111 (41.4%)Moderate/severe (PASI≥7), n (%)24 (68.6%)131 (58.0%)2 (28.6%)157 (58.6%)APs, psoriatic arthritis; PASI, Psoriasis Area and Severity Index; SD, standard deviation.Figure 1.Area under the ROC curve (assessment I)ConclusionPURE-4 is a valid and compliant questionnaire with clinical practice in dermatology. It could be answered by patients in the waiting room and reviewed by dermatologists during the visit to support decision-making. PURE-4 could also help rheumatologists to early diagnose PsA patients in clinical practice.References[1]Actas Dermosifiliogr. 2020;111(8):655-64.AcknowledgementsThe authors thank IQVIA and Carmen Barrull, Neus Canal and Marco Pinel for providing medical editorial assistance with this presentation.Disclosure of InterestsRubén Queiro Silva Speakers bureau: AbbVie, MSD, Pfizer, Novartis, Lilly, Janssen, UCB y Celgene., Consultant of: AbbVie, MSD, Pfizer, Novartis, Lilly, Janssen, UCB y Celgene., Grant/research support from: Novartis, AbbVie y Janssen., Isabel Belinchón Speakers bureau: Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc., Almirall, Lilly, AbbVie, Novartis, Celgene, Biogen Amgen, Leo-Pharma, Pfizer-Wyeth, UCB y MSD., Consultant of: Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc., Almirall, Lilly, AbbVie, Novartis, Celgene, Biogen Amgen, Leo-Pharma, Pfizer-Wyeth, UCB y MSD., Anna Lopez-Ferrer Speakers bureau: Novartis, Janssen, MSD, Lilly, Pfizer,Celgene, Almirall, Leo Pharma, AbbVie y Amgen., Consultant of: Novartis, Janssen, MSD, Lilly, Pfizer,Celgene, Almirall, Leo Pharma, AbbVie y Amgen., Marta Ferran i Farrés Speakers bureau: Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, MSD, AbbVie, Celgene y Almirall., Paid instructor for: Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, MSD, AbbVie, Celgene y Almirall., Consultant of: Janssen, Lilly, Novartis, Pfizer, MSD, AbbVie, Celgene y Almirall., Raquel Rivera Díaz Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Almirall, Celgene Corporation, GSK, Janssen-Cilag, Lilly, LEO Pharma, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer y UCB., Paid instructor for: AbbVie, Almirall, Celgene Corporation, GSK, Janssen-Cilag, Lilly, LEO Pharma, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer y UCB., Consultant of: AbbVie, Almirall, Celgene Corporation, GSK, Janssen-Cilag, Lilly, LEO Pharma, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer y UCB., David Vidal Sarro Speakers bureau: Lilly, Janssen, AbbVie, Novartis, UCB, Celgene, Gebro y Leo., Paid instructor for: Lilly, Janssen, AbbVie, Novartis, UCB, Celgene, Gebro y Leo., Consultant of: Lilly, Janssen, AbbVie, Novartis, UCB, Celgene, Gebro y Leo., lourdes rodriguez freire Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc., MSD, Pfizer-Wyeth, Novartis, Celgene, Almirall SA, Lilly y Leo-Pharma., Consultant of: AbbVie, Janssen Pharmaceuticals Inc., MSD, Pfizer-Wyeth, Novartis, Celgene, Almirall SA, Lilly y Leo-Pharma., Pablo de la Cueva Dobao Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, Boehringer, Biogen, Celgene, Gebro, Janssen Cilag, Leo-Pharma, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer- Wyeth, Sandoz, Sanofi y UCB., Paid instructor for: AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, Boehringer, Biogen, Celgene, Gebro, Janssen Cilag, Leo-Pharma, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer- Wyeth, Sandoz, Sanofi y UCB., Consultant of: AbbVie, Almirall, Amgen, Boehringer, Biogen, Celgene, Gebro, Janssen Cilag, Leo-Pharma, Lilly, MSD, Novartis, Pfizer- Wyeth, Sandoz, Sanofi y UCB., Jorge Santos Juanes Speakers bureau: Novartis, Lilly, Janssen, Abbvie, Amgen, y Sanofi., Consultant of: Novartis, Lilly, Janssen, Abbvie, Amgen, y Sanofi., Grant/research support from: Novartis, Lilly, Janssen, Abbvie, Amgen, y Sanofi., Vicenç Rocamora Duran Speakers bureau: Jansen, Lilly, Abbvie, Almirall, Amgen y Novartis., Paid instructor for: Jansen, Lilly, Abbvie, Almirall, Amgen y Novartis., Cristina Sanabra Employee of: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Spain, Guillermo Guinea Uzábal Employee of: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Spain, Víctor Martín Vázquez Employee of: Novartis Pharmaceuticals Spain
34
Rims, C., V. Muir, K. Deane, S. Nagpal, N. Rao, F. Baribaud, G. Vratsanos i in. "THU0033 ALTERATIONS IN THE PHENOTYPIC LANDSCAPE AND SPECIFICITY OF CD4+ T CELLS IN CCP+ AT RISK SUBJECTS BEFORE THE ONSET OF RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS". Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 79, Suppl 1 (czerwiec 2020): 230.1–230. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-eular.1918.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
Background:The “Targeting Immune Responses for Prevention of RA” (TIP-RA) collaboration studies individuals at high risk for developing rheumatoid arthritis (RA) because of serum anti-citrullinated protein antibody (ACPA) positivity in absence of arthritis at baseline, and is focused on defining how they transition from at-risk to classifiable disease. One potential mechanism is the expansion of antigen specific T cells that recognize self-antigens and acquisition of disease associated T cell phenotypes. ACPA emerge years prior to clinically apparent disease and subsequently increase in their titer and breadth of specificity. However, few studies have characterized T cells during this transition.Objectives:To identify features associated with progression to RA by examining the specificity and surface phenotype of CD4+ T cells in individuals from the TIP-RA cohort by HLA class II tetramer staining and multi-parameter flow cytometry.Methods:Tetramer staining and flow cytometry were performed on peripheral blood samples from a baseline visit from CCP3- controls (n=34), CCP3+ at-risk (n=26), CCP3+ positive individuals who transitioned in the near-term to RA (called “RA converters”, n=4), and seropositive early-RA (n=21). Our staining panel allowed us to measure the frequencies of T cells specific for citrullinated alpha-enolase, aggrecan, cartilage intermediate layer protein (CILP), fibrinogen and vimentin. We then applied both supervised phenotyping and a cluster-based computational approach to compare the phenotypic landscape and specificity of antigen specific and total CD4+ T cells in each cohort.Results:We observed higher overall frequencies of T cells that recognize citrullinated epitopes in CCP3+ at-risk subjects than CCP- controls (p< 0.05). Among the individual specificities, elevated frequencies prior to disease onset were most prominent for CILP specific T cells. Supervised phenotypic analysis revealed an increase in CCR4+ CD4+ T cells in CCP3+ at risk subjects (p< 0.001) and a corresponding decrease in CXCR3+ CD4+ T cells that was most pronounced in RA converters and seropositive early-RA (p< 0.05). Cluster-based phenotypic analysis defined ten distinct phenotypic states present within all subjects. Each of these ten immunotypes contained T cells that recognize citrullinated epitopes. However, the predominant immunotype varied for different antigens. During progression, the frequencies of Ag specific T cells diminished when onset was imminent, but rebounded shortly after diagnosis. Concomitantly, Ag specific T cells with memory phenotypes were diminished, but subsequently reverted to TSCM, Th1, and Th1-17 like phenotypes.Conclusion:Our data show that disease associated changes in the antigen specificity of CD4+ T cells are present in CCP3+ at-risk subjects. Furthermore, the number of antigen specific T cells and their phenotype are perturbed before the onset of symptoms and development of classified RA. These findings support a continuum of immunologic changes that underlie risk and drive disease, motivating new approaches for early intervention.Acknowledgments:We gratefully acknowledge the Targeting Immune Responses for Prevention of Rheumatoid Arthritis (TIP-RA) for designing and executing this collaborative studyDisclosure of Interests:Cliff Rims: None declared, Virginia Muir: None declared, Kevin Deane Grant/research support from: Janssen, Consultant of: Inova, ThermoFisher, Janseen, BMS and Microdrop, Sunil Nagpal Shareholder of: Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Employee of: Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Navin Rao Shareholder of: Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Employee of: Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Frederic Baribaud Shareholder of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, George Vratsanos Shareholder of: Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Employee of: Janssen Pharmaceuticals, V. Michael Holers Grant/research support from: Janssen, Celgene, and BMS, Peter Linsley Consultant of: BMS, Eddie A. James Grant/research support from: Janssen, Pfizer, Sanofi, Novartis, Jane Buckner Grant/research support from: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen
35
Deane, K., G. Firestein, D. Boyle, J. Buckner, E. A. James, S. Posso, W. Robinson i in. "SAT0003 ELEVATED BASELINE AND INCREASING AUTOANTIBODY LEVELS ARE ASSOCIATED WITH INCREASED RISK FOR IMMINENT ONSET OF INFLAMMATORY ARTHRITIS IN A PROSPECTIVELY STUDIED ANTI-CITRULLINATED PROTEIN ANTIBODY POSITIVE COHORT: THE TIP-RA COLLECTIVE". Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 79, Suppl 1 (czerwiec 2020): 932.1–932. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2020-eular.5713.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
Background:The Targeting Immune Responses for Prevention of RA (TIP-RA) Collaborative prospectively studies individuals at high risk for developing RA because of serum ACPA positivity in absence of baseline inflammatory arthritis (IA).Objectives:The objective of the analyses presented herein is to evaluate the role of baseline and changing levels of ACPA and rheumatoid factor (RF) in relationship to incident IA/RA.Methods:ACPA+ subjects and ACPA- controls were identified who did not have baseline historical or examination evidence of IA. ACPA+ was defined by serum elevation of anti-CCP3 ≥20 units (Inova). Subjects were evaluated annually or sooner if they had changes in joint symptoms. Factors including RFIgM and RFIgA (Inova) were also assessed, and relationships between autoantibody levels at baseline and over time and incident IA/RA were evaluated using t-tests, with paired testing where applicable.Results:Baseline characteristics of ACPA+ and ACPA- subjects are in Table 1. Sixteen of the 94 (17%) ACPA+ subjects developed IA/RA a mean of 518 days from the baseline visit; 14 of these met 2010 ACR/EULAR criteria for RA at the time of detection of IA. There was a trend for ACPA+ subjects who later developed IA/RA to have higher baseline levels of anti-CCP3 compared to those who did not develop IA/RA (Table 2). In addition, those who developed IA/RA had significantly higher mean levels of RFIgM and RFIgA compared to those who did not. While not statistically significant, in longitudinal analyses in the ACPA+ subjects with incident IA/RA, anti-CCP3 levels increased from baseline to identification of IA (mean [SD] of 119 [102] to 126 [100], p=0.42). Furthermore, RFIgM levels increased from 36 [49] at baseline to 43 [51] at the time of IA (p=0.31), and RFIgA levels increased from 16 [29] to 21 [31] (p=0.10). In contrast, in ACPA+ subjects who did not develop IA/RA, anti-CCP3 levels increased only slightly over follow-up of a mean of 712 days: 75 [75] to 80 [76], p=0.70 while the levels of RFIgM and RFIgA decreased slightly during the same follow-up: for RFIgM mean [SD] levels went from 9 [22] to 8 [19], p=0.74; for RFIgA, 5 [16] to 3 [12], p=0.67.Table 1.Baseline characteristics of ACPA+/- subjectsACPA-(n=162)ACPA+(n=94)p-valueAge, mean58580.90% Female69680.67% Ever smoker33340.87RF-IgM, mean (SD)3.2 (10.0)13.5 (30.2)<0.01RF-IgA, mean (SD)0.3 (0.6)6.5 (19.1)<0.01Table 2.Baseline characteristics of 16 ACPA+ subjects who developed incident IA/RA vs. 78 ACPA+ who did notDid not develop IA/RA (n=78)Developed IA/RA (n=16)p-valueDays from baseline to IA/RA or follow-up, mean (SD)712 (124)518 (295)–% Meeting 2010 criteria at time of IA-88–CCP3, mean (SD)74.5 (75.3)119.1 (102.1)0.05RFIgM, mean (SD)9 (22)36 (49)<0.01RFIgA, mean (SD)4 (16)16 (29)0.03Conclusion:In this prospectively followed cohort of ACPA+ subjects, higher levels of RFIgM and RFIgA at baseline were significantly associated with development of IA/RA within the follow-up period. Furthermore, there was a trend for rising levels of anti-CCP3 and RFIgM and A to be associated with development of IA/RA. These finding support the use of higher and/or rising levels of autoantibodies as additional features to predict imminent onset of IA/RA in ACPA+ individuals as well as potentially to use as outcomes of success of preventive interventions. Furthermore, the trend of increasing levels of RFIgM and RFIgA over time in individuals who developed IA/RA suggests that targeting pathways of RF development may lead to preventive interventions in a subset of RA.References:NoneDisclosure of Interests:Kevin Deane Grant/research support from: Janssen, Consultant of: Inova, ThermoFisher, Janseen, BMS and Microdrop, Gary Firestein Grant/research support from: Lilly, Janssen, Abbvie, David Boyle: None declared, Jane Buckner Grant/research support from: Bristol-Myers Squibb, Janssen, Eddie A. James Grant/research support from: Janssen, Pfizer, Sanofi, Novartis, Sylvia Posso Grant/research support from: Janssen, William Robinson Grant/research support from: Janssen, Laurie K. Moss Grant/research support from: Janssen, Jennifer Seifert Grant/research support from: Janssen, Roger Gilmore Grant/research support from: Janssen, Saman Barzideh Grant/research support from: Janssen, Navin Rao Shareholder of: Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Employee of: Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Frederic Baribaud Shareholder of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Employee of: Janssen Research & Development, LLC, Sunil Nagpal Shareholder of: Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Employee of: Janssen Pharmaceuticals, Alyssa Johnsen Employee of: Janssen, V. Michael Holers Grant/research support from: Janssen, Celgene, and BMS
36
Isnardi, C. A., E. E. Civit De Garignani, A. García Ciccarelli, J. Sanchez Alcover, R. Garcia Salinas, S. Magri, E. Albiero i in. "AB0214 SURVIVAL, EFFICACY AND SAFETY OF GOLIMUMAB IN PATIENTS WITH RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS AND SPONDYLOARTHRITIS: DATA FROM AN ARGENTINEAN COHORT". Annals of the Rheumatic Diseases 80, Suppl 1 (19.05.2021): 1133–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2021-eular.1399.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
Background:Golimumab is a human monoclonal antibody directed against TNFα in its soluble and transmembrane forms. It can be used subcutaneously or intravenously and has shown efficacy for use in patients with rheumatoid arthritis (RA), psoriatic arthritis (PsA) and ankylosing spondylitis (AS).Objectives:The aim of this study was to evaluate the efficacy, safety, and cumulative survival of golimumab in patients with RA, PsA and AS from different rheumatology centers in Argentina.Methods:We performed a longitudinal study of consecutive adults with RA (ACR/EULAR 2010 criteria), PsA (CASPAR criteria) and AS (ASAS 2009 criteria), who have started treatment with subcutaneous or intravenous golimumab according to medical indication in each center. Data was obtained by review of medical records. Sociodemographic and clinical data, musculoskeletal manifestations, comorbidities, previous treatments were recorded. In reference to golimumab treatment, start date, route of administration and concomitant treatments were identified. Disease activity was assessed using DAS28 for RA patients, DAPSA and MDA for PsA and BASDAI for AS. The presence of adverse events (AE) was recorded. If golimumab was stopped, date and cause was documented. Patients were followed up until golimumab discontinuation, loss of follow-up, or study completion (November 30, 2020). Statistical analysis: Chi2 test or Fischer exact test and T test or Mann Whitney and ANOVA or Kruskal Wallis, as appropriate. The incidence of EA was assessed in events every 100 patient/year. Kaplan-Meier curves and log Rank analysis. Cox proportional regression.Results:One hundred eighty two patients were included, 116 with a diagnosis of RA, 30 with PsA and 36 with AS. Most of them (70.9%) were female with a median (m) age of 55 years (IQR 43.8-64) and m disease duration of 7 years (IQR 4-12.7) at treatment initiation. Al least one prior biological DMARD or a small molecule was received by 63 patients (34.6%). The most frequent indication cause was conventional DMARD failure. In 94.8% of the patients Golimumab was administered subcutaneously, and in 80.8% in association with conventional DMARDs, the most frequently used was methotrexate. Total follow-up was 318.1 patients/year.Golimumab treatment showed clinical improvement in all three groups of patients. In RA patients DAS28 significantly decreased during the first 12 months of follow-up, m 5.9 (IQR 4.9-6.6) at baseline, 3.8 (IQR 2.6-4.6) at 6 months and 2.8 (IQR 2.1-3.6) at 12 months, p <0.0001. In PsA, m DAPSA-ESR value was 32.2 (IQR 24.2-47.7), 10.1 (IQR 5.8-18.3) and 11.2 (IQR 3.4-24) at baseline, 6 and 12 months, respectably (p <0.0001). In AS, m BASDAI was 6.2 (IQR 4.8-7.3), 2.8 (IQR 1.7-4.1) and 2.2 (IQR 1.1-3.2), at baseline, 6 and 12 months respectively (p <0.0001).The incidence of adverse events was 6.6 per 100 patients/year, being infections the most frequents ones. During follow-up, 50 patients (27.5%) discontinued golimumab, the most frequent cause was treatment failure (68%), followed by lack of health insurance (16%) and adverse events (10%). Golimumab persistence was 79% and 57.6% at 12 and 24 months, respectively. Treatment survival was 50.2 months (95% CI 44.4-55.9). Patients who had received prior treatment with biological DMARDs or small molecules showed lower survival (Figure 1). In the multivariate analysis, adjusting for age, sex and disease duration, those patients showed twice the risk of suspending treatment (HR 2.01, 95% CI 1.1-3.7).Figure 1.Golimumab survival according to prior b-DMARD o small molecule treatment.Conclusion:Golimumab treatment in real life patients in Argentina has shown good efficacy and safety. Drug survival was over 4 years and almost 80% were still using golimumab after one year. Prior treatment with other b-DMARDs o small molecules was associated with lower treatment survival.Disclosure of Interests:Carolina Ayelen Isnardi Speakers bureau: Bristol Myers Squibb, Janssen, Grant/research support from: Pfizer, Emma Estela Civit De Garignani Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Novartis, Agustín García Ciccarelli Speakers bureau: Janssen, Novartis, Consultant of: Novartis, Grant/research support from: Janssen, Novartis, Jimena Sanchez Alcover: None declared, Rodrigo Garcia Salinas Speakers bureau: Abbvie, AMGEN, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, GSK, Janssen Cilag, Montpellier-UCB, Novartis, Roche – Genentech, Sanofi, Merck Serono., Sebastian Magri Speakers bureau: Abbvie, AMGEN, Bristol-Myers Squibb, Eli Lilly, GSK, Janssen Cilag, Montpellier-UCB, Novartis, Roche – Genentech, Sanofi, Merck Serono., Eduardo Albiero Consultant of: Janssen, Carla Gobbi Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Consultant of: Pfizer, Janssen, Edson Velozo Speakers bureau: Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Consultant of: Abbvie, Janssen, Novartis, Grant/research support from: Janssen, Novartis, Pfizer, Enrique Soriano Speakers bureau: AbbVie, Novartis, Bristol MS, Novartis, Eli Lilly, Genzyme, Pfizer, Amgen, and Roche, Consultant of: Novartis, AbbVie, Pfizer, Eli Lilly, Sanofi, Sandoz, Amgen., Grant/research support from: Roche, Novartis, AbbVie, Glaxo Smith Kline, BMS, Martín Brom: None declared, Johana Zacariaz Grant/research support from: Bristol Myers Squibb, Ingrid Strusberg Speakers bureau: Gema Biotech SAU, BMS, Abbvie, Consultant of: Gema Biotech SAU, Abbvie, Janssen, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Lilly, Galápagos, Servier, GSK, Merck Serono, Marcos BARAVALLE Speakers bureau: Montepellier, Consultant of: Abbvie, Janssen, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Lilly, Galápagos, Servier, GSK, Merck Serono, Sol Castaños Speakers bureau: Abbvie, Lilly, Galápagos, Servier, GSK, Merck Serono, Liliana Morales Speakers bureau: Lilly, Consultant of: Janssen, Grant/research support from: Abbvie, Lilly, Galápagos, Servier, GSK, Merck Serono, Sergio Paira: None declared, Romina Calvo: None declared, Alberto Ortiz: None declared, Rodolfo Perez Alamino Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Abbvie, Amgen, Bristol-Myers-Squibb, Lilly, Janssen, Novartis, Hernan Maldonado Ficco Speakers bureau: Pfizer, Abbvie, Jansen, Novartis, Bago, Bristol, Eli Lilly., Consultant of: Pfizer, Abbvie, Novartis, Jansen, Bago, Eli Lilly., Gustavo Citera Speakers bureau: Abbvie, BMS, Lilly, Jansen, Gema, Pfizer, Roche, Grant/research support from: Pfizer
37
Bonet, Vanessa. "Covid-19 : vaccin de Janssen autorisé". Soins 66, nr 854 (kwiecień 2021): 8. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/s0038-0814(21)00086-4.
Pełny tekst źródła
38
&NA;. "Hepatitis B vaccine recombinant (Janssen/Medeva)". Drugs in R & D 2, nr 3 (luty 1999): 201–2. http://dx.doi.org/10.2165/00126839-199902030-00011.
Pełny tekst źródła
39
Righart, J. A. "J. Janssen, Jeugdcultuur. Een actuele geschiedenis". BMGN - Low Countries Historical Review 111, nr 1 (1.01.1996): 145. http://dx.doi.org/10.18352/bmgn-lchr.4223.
Pełny tekst źródła
40
Van Damme, Patrick. "Abadaringi Jeroen Janssen Oogachtend, Leuven, 2015". Afrika Focus 29, nr 2 (26.02.2016): 131–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/2031356x-02902013.
Pełny tekst źródła
41
Ban, Thomas A. "Paul Adriaan Jan Janssen, 1926–2003". Neuropsychopharmacology 29, nr 8 (20.07.2004): 1579–80. http://dx.doi.org/10.1038/sj.npp.1300423.
Pełny tekst źródła
42
Fuhrmann, Wilfried. "Janssen, Hauke (1998). Nationalökonomie und Nationalsozialismus". Kyklos 52, nr 1 (luty 1999): 116–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6435.1999.tb02814.x.
Pełny tekst źródła
43
Hainfeld, James F. "STEM analysis of Janssen AuroProbe One". Proceedings, annual meeting, Electron Microscopy Society of America 48, nr 3 (12.08.1990): 954–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0424820100162338.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
The announcement of a smaller (1.0 nm) colloidal gold immunolabel by Janssen Life Sciences recently has heightened the hopes of many researchers to be able to label at higher resolution or have a smaller probe that could better access secluded antigens that are frequently accessible to fluorescent labeled antibodies or Fab fragments but not to the usual 3.0 to 5.0 nm colloidal gold immunolabels. Because the 1.0 nm gold is difficult to visualize directly in the TEM, it must usually be enhanced by a silver developer that nucleates on the gold and grows to grains that are of a useful size.While AuroProbe One has met with some success, some shortcomings have been found. One is that the silver developer can self nucleate, giving some false spots. Also, the grains do not grow uniformly and yield an irregular staining.This report, however, takes a look at the AuroProbe One directly using the high (0.25 nm) resolution STEM in darkfield where 1.0 nm particles are easily seen.
44
LEWI, P. "Dr. Paul Janssen (1926?2003)*1". European Neuropsychopharmacology 14, nr 5 (październik 2004): 353. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.euroneuro.2004.04.005.
Pełny tekst źródła
45
red. "mCRPC: Kooperation von Janssen und Apogepha". Im Focus Onkologie 19, nr 6 (czerwiec 2016): 82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s15015-016-2660-5.
Pełny tekst źródła
46
Basson, Rosemary. "Comment on Janssen et al. (2008)". Archives of Sexual Behavior 37, nr 4 (26.03.2008): 511. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10508-008-9351-z.
Pełny tekst źródła
47
McNair, C. J., i Kathleen H. J. Leibfried. "Janssen pharmaceutica: Focusing through competitive analysis". National Productivity Review 12, nr 1 (1992): 95–110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1002/npr.4040120112.
Pełny tekst źródła
48
Maharjan, Kripa, i Abhishek Tiwary. "Is Janssen responsible for the shock?" Journal of General Practice and Emergency Medicine of Nepal 8, nr 11 (16.08.2021): 59–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.59284/jgpeman58.
Pełny tekst źródłaStreszczenie:
A 53-year-old male with no known comorbidities presented in Emergency department of Trishuli Hospital in shock with 3 days’ history of swelling of whole body and 1-day history of difficulty breathing 3 days after receiving the Janssen Ad26.COV2.S vaccine. Nepal on 19th July, 2021 started the inoculation campaign of Johnson and Johnson vaccine, the third COVID-19 shot approved for public use in the country. Twenty eight cases of cerebral venous sinus thrombi were reported after receiving the Janssen Ad26.COV2.S vaccine, out of which three cases expired.3 However no cases of shock post vaccine has been reported till date. The cause of shock in this patient was not clear. The patient could have massive pulmonary embolism leading to shock with the fact that no other septic foci was found in this patient. As there has been rising demand of the vaccine and unmet need, the general public are going to extreme extent. There should be robust public health awareness and follow up post vaccination. The government and health organizations should be focusing more on the post vaccination status of the public, so that we can prevent such adverse events in future.
49
Arnold, Kerstin, i Roman Janssen. "Rezension von: Janssen, Roman u.a., Nufringen". Schwäbische Heimat 51, nr 2 (26.07.2023): 229. http://dx.doi.org/10.53458/sh.v51i2.7084.
Pełny tekst źródła
50
ㅤ. "Janssen / Sengers e.a. (TvAR 1994/4714)". Tijdschrift voor Agrarisch Recht 54, nr 8 (1.08.1994): ㅤ. http://dx.doi.org/10.5117/tvar1994.8.009.
Pełny tekst źródła