Artigos de revistas: "Bernard Stiegler"

1

Deguy, Michel. "Bernard Stiegler". Po&sie N°174, n.º 4 (2020): 199. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/poesi.174.0199.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

2

Podoroga, Boris V. "Logos and Prosthesis: Bernard Stiegler’s Theory of Tertiary Memory". Vestnik of Northern (Arctic) Federal University. Series Humanitarian and Social Sciences, n.º 6 (15 de dezembro de 2020): 90–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.37482/2687-1505-v067.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

This article discusses the relationship between the concepts of writing and tertiary memory in Bernard Stiegler’s philosophy of technology. It is demonstrated that tertiary memory, being a process of sensuality exteriorization (espacement) that defines the specifics of human existence, is almost identical to Derrida’s writing. Tertiary memory is expressed in everything that falls under the rubric “record”, from the most primitive tools to socio-political institutions and cybernetic technologies. Unlike Derrida, Stiegler believed that tertiary memory is most clearly expressed in material and technical objects. As an example the paper takes Stiegler’s critical analysis of Husserl’s phenomenology and Martin Heidegger’s existential ontology. Stiegler shows that in Husserl’s phenomenology, tertiary memory is represented by tertiary retention (determining a set of symbols, signs and images that implicitly constitute phenomenological experience), while in Heidegger’s philosophy, by the world-historical, determining the objective historical heritage of humankind, without which, as Stiegler demonstrates, there can be no existential experience. Further, the article discusses Stiegler’s thesis about historical and ontological duality of tertiary memory, containing both creative and destructive potential. Referring to Derrida, Stiegler shows that technics should be understood as what Plato called pharmakon, meaning a substance that can be both poison and remedy. This thesis defines the contemporary problem of lacking reflexion of the above-mentioned structural technical duality, which leads to excessive instrumentalization of the technics and its destructive effect on humans, similar to that during the time of Greek sophists.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

3

Englebert, Jean-Claude. "Avec Bernard Stiegler". La Revue Nouvelle N° 6, n.º 6 (1 de setembro de 2020): 14–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/rn.206.0014.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

4

Podoroga, B. V. "Essay on Bernard Stiegler’s history of mnemotechnics". Omsk Scientific Bulletin. Series Society. History. Modernity 5, n.º 4 (2020): 42–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.25206/2542-0488-2020-5-4-42-47.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

The purpose of this article is to present history of memory techniques as it described by French philosopher Bernard Stiegler. It is shown that Stiegler speaks from the point of view of humanistic marxism arguing that the positive development of mnemotechnics is determined by their integration into symbolic relations, outside of which they becomes a means of consumer capitalism. History of mnemotechnics is divided on two large periods — preindustrial and industrial, where the former is determined by the dominance of religion, politics and culture, and the latter — by the law of surplus value. It is analyzed Stiegler’s understanding of mnemotechnics as «epiphylogenesis» or «third memory». The main features of mnemotechnical evolution, from the first inscriptions on stone tools to today’s global digital retentional apparatus, is reviewed

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

5

Sauvêtre, Pierre. "Entretien avec Bernard Stiegler". Tracés, n.º 13 (1 de dezembro de 2007): 249–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.4000/traces.331.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

6

Roberts, Ben. "Introduction to Bernard Stiegler". Parallax 13, n.º 4 (outubro de 2007): 26–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13534640701682776.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

7

Deslandes, Ghislain, e Luca Paltrinieri. "Entretien avec BERNARD STIEGLER". Rue Descartes 91, n.º 1 (2017): 119. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/rdes.091.0119.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

8

MARTÍNEZ CLEVES, FELIX RAUL. "La farmacia de Bernard Stiegler". História da Historiografia: International Journal of Theory and History of Historiography 15, n.º 39 (27 de agosto de 2022): 77–101. http://dx.doi.org/10.15848/hh.v15i39.1873.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

En este artículo se busca hacer evidente una filosofía de la historia que se desprende del pensamiento de Bernard Stiegler (1952-2020). El autor francés no lo planteó explícitamente, pero en su obra insistió en que la historia de la humanidad es una historia técnica de la memoria. Apuntándose a la coherencia de lo propuesto aquí, este texto se orienta desde la perspectiva de la filosofía de la técnica, a la que tanto Stiegler como los grupos Ars Industrialis y Colectivo Internación, en los cuales trabajó, han contribuido ampliamente mediante planteamientos que, recientemente, se han sintetizado en la obra Bifurquer (2020). Por ello, este documento es también una invitación a pensar la memoria con y desde la técnica como una vía para la búsqueda de respuestas a los problemas del mundo actual. En síntesis, concebir la historia como una farmacología y una terapéutica para, lejos de plantear una teleología, contribuir a una repolitización de la memoria.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

9

Hansen, Mark B. N. "Bernard Stiegler, Philosopher of Desire?" boundary 2 44, n.º 1 (5 de janeiro de 2017): 167–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/01903659-3725929.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

10

Berger Soraruff, Amelie. "A Pharmacology of Cinema". Cultural Politics 17, n.º 2 (1 de julho de 2021): 212–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/17432197-8947907.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

Abstract French philosopher Bernard Stiegler inscribes himself in the tradition of critical theory. In this respect, the influence of Adorno and Horkheimer has been crucial to the development of his own understanding of cinema. Yet Stiegler reproaches his predecessors for not having stressed enough the positive virtues of cinema on culture. For Stiegler the industry of cinema is not simply a menace to the human mind, but a positive medium for its reinvention. It is in that sense that cinema is pharmacological, insofar as it can be either spiritually and culturally enhancing or destructive, depending on how it is acted on. As the article concludes, Stiegler's pharmacology of cinema invites us to take part in our cinematic cultural becoming through the revival of the figure of the amateur. But it does so at the risk of cultural snobbery. While Stiegler does not condemn the cinematic medium per se, he does express clear reservations on the potential of commercial cinema, the pharmacological critique of which remains to be thought.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

11

Lampe, Kurt. "Stiegler, Foucault, and Epictetus". Symposium 24, n.º 2 (2020): 53–77. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/symposium202024212.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

Why does Bernard Stiegler speak of “this culture, which I have named, after Epictetus, my melete?” In the first part of this article, I elucidate Stiegler’s claims about both Stoic exercises of reading and writing and their significance for the interpretive questions he has adapted from Michel Foucault and Jacques Derrida. In particular, I address the relations among care for oneself and others, the use of material technologies, and resistance to subjection or “freedom.” In the second part, I consider the merits and limitations of Stiegler’s comments about reading and writing in Stoicism, with particular attention to Epictetus. We will see that Stiegler’s interpretive frame-work casts considerable light on ancient texts and contexts, on the condition that it be combined with close reading of ancient texts and engagement with specialist scholarship. Finally, in the conclusion, I will suggest that the history of technology in Epictetus’s time contributes to a debate about Stiegler’s theories.Bernard Stiegler signale à plusieurs reprises l’importance des exercices stoïciens de lecture et d’écriture. Dans la première partie de cet article, j’essaye de clarifier ces assertions et d’expliquer leur lien aux oeuvres de Michel Foucault et de Jacques Derrida. Il s’agit en particulier des rapports entre le souci de soi et d’autrui, l’usage des techniques et des matériaux et la résistante à la soumission ou à la « liberté ». Dans la deuxième partie, je considère les mérites ainsi que les limites des remarques de Stiegler sur la lecture et l’écriture au sein du stoïcisme, en portant une attention particulière à Épictète. Le point du vue stieglerien donnera de nouvelles significations à quelques passages des oeuvres d’Épictète, à condition qu’il soit conjugué à une lecture attentive d’études spécialisées et de textes anciens. Je conclurai, dans la troisième partie, en proposant que l’histoire des techniques à l’époque d’Épictète pourrait alimenter un débat à l’égard des théories de Stiegler.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

12

Wambacq, Judith, Daniel Ross e Bart Buseyne. "‘We Have to Become the Quasi-cause of Nothing – of Nihil’: An Interview with Bernard Stiegler". Theory, Culture & Society 35, n.º 2 (26 de julho de 2016): 137–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0263276416651932.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

This interview with the philosopher Bernard Stiegler was conducted in Paris on 28 January 2015, and first appeared in Dutch translation in the journal De uil van Minerva. The conversation begins by discussing the fundamental place occupied by the concept of ‘technics’ in Stiegler’s work, and how the ‘constitutivity’ of technics does and does not relate to Kant and Husserl. Stiegler is then asked about his relationship with Deleuze, and he responds by focusing on the concept of quasi-causality, but also by arguing that there is a certain trajectory in Deleuze’s thought, situating his own philosophy in relation to its various moments. Stiegler is then asked to respond to the Charlie Hebdo terrorist attacks carried out three weeks prior to the interview. After making a couple of precautionary remarks, Stiegler relates such occurrences to the problem of what he calls ‘spiritual poverty’, to the intensification of ‘negative sublimation’ that can occur when there is a disconnection between the generations, and more generally to the growth of nihilism. All of these phenomena relate to the exploitation of technology by a virulent capitalism that irrationally believes that only the market is rational. After consideration of the complex historical relationship between Islam and modernization, and of both of these to Nietzsche’s ‘death of God’, and after recalling the destructive role played by the West in the rise of fundamentalism and jihadism, Stiegler concludes by reflecting on the fact that, ultimately, ‘intellectuals’ have failed to use technologies in ways that produce alternatives to consumerism.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

13

Bishop, Ryan, e Daniel Ross. "Technics, Time and the Internation: Bernard Stiegler’s Thought – A Dialogue with Daniel Ross". Theory, Culture & Society 38, n.º 4 (24 de março de 2021): 111–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0263276421990435.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

This interview with Bernard Stiegler’s long-time translator and collaborator, Daniel Ross, examines the connections between different periods of Stiegler’s work, thought, writing and activism. Moving from the three volumes of Technics and Time to the final large-scale collaborative project of The Internation, the discussion concentrates on Stiegler’s conceptualization of ‘protentionality’, hope and care for a world confronted by climate crises, entropy and computational economic reconfigurations of work, economy and imaginations for futural possibilities. The interview foreshadows the special issue on The Internation project planned by Bishop and Stiegler for TCS that will appear in the near future.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

14

Bradley, Joff P. N. "On the curation of negentropic forms of knowledge". Praxis Educativa 25, n.º 1 (1 de janeiro de 2021): 1–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.19137/praxiseducativa-2021-250103.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

My intention is to consider Bernard Stiegler’s concept of “journeys of knowledge” (Stiegler, 2020a) in the wake of the experience of confinement in the time of the corona virus pandemic. I reflect on this during the time of the corona virus in my own isolation, withdrawal, confinement and loneliness because my interest in the concept of “journeys of knowledge” lies in how to use the internet in bifurcatory ways to produce what Stiegler calls “negentropic knowledge,” or new forms of knowledge, or what I want to designate as experiments with truth-telling. With the above in mind, it is by rethinking the concept of curation in a different way that it is hoped I can contribute to educational research and produce my own bifurcation of knowledge.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

15

Erkan, Ekin. "Laruelle Qua Stiegler: On Non-Marxism and the Transindividual". Identities: Journal for Politics, Gender and Culture 16, n.º 1-2 (28 de dezembro de 2019): 48–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.51151/identities.v16i1-2.372.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

Alexander R. Galloway and Jason R. LaRiviére’s article “Compression in Philosophy” seeks to pose François Laruelle’s engagement with metaphysics against Bernard Stiegler’s epistemological rendering of idealism. Identifying Laruelle as the theorist of genericity, through which mankind and the world are identified through an index of “opacity,” the authors argue that Laruelle does away with all deleterious philosophical “data.” Laruelle’s generic immanence is posed against Stiegler’s process of retention and discretization, as Galloway and LaRiviére argue that Stiegler’s philosophy seeks to reveal an enchanted natural world through the development of noesis. By further developing Laruelle and Stiegler’s Marxian projects, I seek to demonstrate the limits of this vantage of “compression.” In turn, I also seek to create further bricolage between Laruelle and Stiegler while also further elaborating on their distinct engagement(s) with Marx, offering the mold of synthesis as an alternative to compression when considering Stiegler’s work on transindividuation. In turn, this paper seeks to survey some of the contemporary theorists drawing from Stiegler (Yuk Hui, Alexander Wilson and Daniel Ross) and Laruelle (Anne-Françoise Schmidt, Gilles Grelet, Ray Brassier, Katerina Kolozova, John Ó Maoilearca and Jonathan Fardy) to examine political discourse regarding the posthuman and non-human, with a particular interest in Kolozova’s unified theory of standard philosophy and Capital. Author(s): Ekin Erkan Title (English): Laruelle Qua Stiegler: On Non-Marxism and the Transindividual Journal Reference: Identities: Journal for Politics, Gender and Culture, Vol. 16, No. 1-2 (Summer - Winter 2019) Publisher: Institute of Social Sciences and Humanities - Skopje Page Range: 48-66 Page Count: 19 Citation (English): Ekin Erkan, “Laruelle Qua Stiegler: On Non-Marxism and the Transindividual,” Identities: Journal for Politics, Gender and Culture, Vol. 16, No. 1-2 (Summer - Winter 2019): 48-66.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

16

Crogan, Patrick. "Bernard Stiegler: Philosophy, Technics, and Activism". Cultural Politics: an International Journal 6, n.º 2 (1 de julho de 2010): 133–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.2752/175174310x12672016548162.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

17

Bishop, Ryan. "Bernard Stiegler and the Internation Project: An Introduction". Theory, Culture & Society 39, n.º 7-8 (dezembro de 2022): 5–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02632764221141804.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

This article serves as the introduction to the Annual Review special section entitled ‘Bernard Stiegler and the Internation Project: Computational Practices and Circumscribed Futures’. As such, it introduces the collective undertaking of the Internation Project in relation to Stiegler’s long career as a thinker, educator and community organizer. The introduction pursues a number of themes addressed in the section’s contributions, including pharmacological logic, transindividuation, computational practices, bifurcation and negentropy (means of slowing entropic processes at individual and collective levels). All of these themes pertain to the climate crises the world collectively faces and posit means by which futures can be conceived in less detrimental and destructive economic, social, technological and intellectual ways. The Internation Collective as represented and furthered in this special section responds to the demands of climate crises through a macroeconomic model designed to combat entropy at various scales, from the bio-chemical to the biosphere.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

18

Crogan, Patrick. "Bernard Stiegler on Algorithmic Governmentality: A New Regimen of Truth?" New Formations 98, n.º 98 (1 de julho de 2019): 48–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.3898/newf:98.04.2019.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

This essay examines philosopher of technology and media Bernard Stiegler's propositions concerning the nature and effects of the automation of social existence through computational processes deployed in online media. It argues for the critical pertinence of Stiegler's approach to this widespread and now increasingly apparent deployment. I centre my examination on Stiegler's adoption and critical re-reading of Antoinette Rouvroy and Thomas Berns' concept of 'algorithmic governmentality'. This concept characterises the realtime deployment of these automated processes as a significant transformation from the pre-digital era's application of statistical methods of analysis and prediction of social phenomena, a transformation driven above all by the strategic development and application of recent advances in AI and machine learning. Drawing on Michel Foucault's influential analysis of governmentality and his work on the interconnections of power, knowledge and truth in social control, Rouvroy and Berns propose that algorithmic governmentality ushers in a new regime of truth. Stiegler accepts in large part their analysis of what I term this new 'regimen' but challenges the claim that it amounts to the apparatus of a new truth. My discussion considers the terms and the stakes of this disagreement about the truth, and the place of the technological regimen in this disagreement.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

19

Watt, Calum. "The Uses of Maurice Blanchot in Bernard Stiegler's Technics and Time". Paragraph 39, n.º 3 (novembro de 2016): 305–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/para.2016.0203.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

This article argues that Maurice Blanchot is a significant presence in Bernard Stiegler's Technics and Time series. The article first sets out Stiegler's invocation of the Blanchotian ‘change of epoch’ in the first volume, which attempts to situate Blanchot within the horizon of technics. I argue Blanchot's disaster is a hidden element in Stiegler's play on the motifs of the star and catastrophe. The article then traces how these motifs emerge in the second and third volumes, in which the technical forms of photography and cinema become more important and where the motifs are woven together through reference to works by Roland Barthes, D. W. Winnicott and Federico Fellini. Stiegler filters these references to apparently disparate figures through Blanchot's analyses of writing and temporality. Tracing both overt and unacknowledged references to Blanchot in Stiegler's text, I conclude that Stiegler's use of Blanchot destabilizes his conceptions of time and epochality.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

20

Pacheco, Adelaide. "O homem e a técnica em Bernard Stiegler". Trans/Form/Ação 44, spe (2021): 163–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0101-3173.2021.v44dossier.09.p163.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

RESUMO: A filosofia da técnica de Bernard Stiegler mostra o caráter intrinsecamente trágico da evolução tecnológica, mas defende que é possível explorar a natureza ambivalente ou farmacológica dos instrumentos técnicos. Num primeiro momento, acompanha-se o seu percurso argumentativo, destacando o papel por ele atribuído aos instrumentos em geral na abertura da temporalidade extática, assim como o estatuto singular das técnicas de registo “ortotético”, como condição simultaneamente desestabilizadora e possibilitadora de uma consciência histórica e hermenêutica. Num segundo momento, mostra-se o que Stiegler considera ser o pharmakon fundamental do Antropoceno e a centralidade da questão da entropia e da neguentropia, para pensar uma possível saída para a catástrofe ambiental. Num terceiro momento, examina-se a crítica de Stiegler ao transumanismo e a sua proposta de uma negociação e composição entre a tradição humanista e o desenvolvimento tecnológico.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

21

Sullivan, Gordon. "“We Do Not Look At Them As They Really Are”: Technics andPhotogéniein Jean Epstein's Film-Philosophy". Film-Philosophy 22, n.º 3 (outubro de 2018): 406–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/film.2018.0087.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

This article argues that we can understand Jean Epstein's theory of photogénie as an instance of technics. Starting from a reading of Epstein's final fictional film Le Tempestaire (1947), we can see that Epstein collapses the distinction between human and technological. This insight leads to a discussion of Epstein's theory of photogénie more generally, and one that highlights the term's relationship to temporality. This temporal dimension recalls Bernard Stiegler's discussion of technics in Technics and Time (3 volumes). As the series evolves, Stiegler increasingly foregrounds cinema as technics, and the essay ends with a discussion of the ways that Epstein's understanding of photogénie can press on Stiegler's claims.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

22

Tkach, David. "Reading Technics with (and Against) Bernard Stiegler". Cultural Studies 30, n.º 6 (13 de março de 2015): 1034–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/09502386.2015.1020958.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

23

Turner, Ben. "Ideology and Post-structuralism after Bernard Stiegler". Journal of Political Ideologies 22, n.º 1 (2 de novembro de 2016): 92–110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/13569317.2016.1253135.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

24

James, Ian. "Bernard Stiegler and the Time of Technics". Cultural Politics: an International Journal 6, n.º 2 (1 de julho de 2010): 207–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.2752/175174310x12672016548360.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

25

Egliston, Ben. "Watch to win? E-sport, broadcast expertise and technicity in Dota 2". Convergence: The International Journal of Research into New Media Technologies 26, n.º 5-6 (10 de junho de 2019): 1174–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1354856519851180.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

This article analyses how broadcasts of electronic sport (e-sport) condition the gameplay practices of those who watch. Extending and deepening a limited body of past work, I conduct this analysis through a post-phenomenological perspective, adopting Bernard Stiegler’s theory of technicity. Stiegler provides a useful theorisation of how technical forms carry significant implications for the human, whose status is always already technical. As Stiegler sees it, adopting new advancements or changes in technical forms conditions human experience and behaviour profoundly. Mobilising this post-phenomenological view, I examine how players, through the prism of broadcast e-sport, negotiate the temporal, corporeal and technical aspects of their own gameplay. To do this, I draw upon findings from a wider research project about e-sports broadcasts in Valve Corporation’s popular game Dota 2, showing how various complicated and sometimes antagonistic entanglements emerge from the assemblage of e-sports broadcasts and the gameplay of its viewers.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

26

Martínez Cleves, Félix Raúl. "Una escucha para el cuidado. Contribuciones desde el pensamiento de Bernard Stiegler". Temperamentvm 18 (6 de setembro de 2022): e14055. http://dx.doi.org/10.58807/tmptvm20225132.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

Los planteamientos teóricos respecto de la técnica por parte de Bernard Stiegler pueden ser utilizados para comprender la oralidad como una tecnología, de las contribuciones de dicha tecnología para con el cuidado, y de la importancia del cuidado en la configuración de una economía política negantrópica. El presente artículo propone un soporte teórico para la investigación cualitativa en enfermería y otras ciencias de la salud. Para ello, se realiza un planteamiento general de las ideas de Stiegler, y a partir de allí se construye un diálogo que, utilizando distintas fuentes, identifica elementos de la oralidad en función del cuidado. Uno de los argumentos que se deriva, radica en que la posibilidad de estudios en esta perspectiva no se limita a estudios de caso, en cambio, pueden ser contribuyentes a epistemologías distantes del Antropoceno. Así, este trabajo abre caminos de diálogos teóricos y metodológicos a través del pensamiento de Bernard Stiegler, llamando la atención de investigaciones donde se comprenda la oralidad como una tecnología y su relevancia metodológica respecto de la escucha, contribuyendo tanto al cuidado, como a modelos económicos negantrópicos.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

27

Colebrook, Claire. "Fidelity, Betrayal, and the Time of Bernard Stiegler". American Book Review 43, n.º 1 (março de 2022): 148–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/abr.2022.0034.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

28

Lemmens, Pieter. "Bernard Stiegler on Agriculture as a Technical System". Sustainable Agriculture Research 3, n.º 3 (2 de julho de 2014): 76. http://dx.doi.org/10.5539/sar.v3n3p76.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

<p>According to Bernard Stiegler’s theory of techno-evolution, technologies have an intrinsically pharmacological nature. They can be both supportive and destructive for sociotechnical practices based on them. Technological innovations always first disrupt existing sociotechnical practices, but can and should then always be appropriated by the social system to be turned into a new technical system upon which new sociotechnical practices are based. As constituted and conditioned by a technical system, agriculture is necessarily a system of care. Current deployment of transgenic technologies under capitalist conditions leads to processes of proletarianization in agriculture, which has led to their widespread rejection. However, they can and should become the basis of a new system of care, but only under the condition that they are wrought from corporate control and redeployed to initiate a process of deproletarianization</p>

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

29

Beardsworth, Richard. "Technology and Politics: A Response to Bernard Stiegler". Cultural Politics: an International Journal 6, n.º 2 (1 de julho de 2010): 181–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.2752/175174310x12672016548289.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

30

Crowley, M. "Bernard Stiegler Goes Seal-Hunting with Joseph Beuys". Forum for Modern Language Studies 49, n.º 1 (5 de novembro de 2012): 45–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/fmls/cqs063.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

31

Krzykawski, Michał. "What Is a Neganthropic Institution?" Theory, Culture & Society 39, n.º 7-8 (dezembro de 2022): 99–115. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/02632764221141604.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

This article discusses the relation between the institutions and the production of entropy as read by Bernard Stiegler and locates this discussion within a more specific debate on institutions in advanced capitalism. Commenting on Stiegler’s approach to the concept of entropy, the article brings into focus the institutional strand of Stiegler’s increasingly hurried writings where this concept is discussed and reframes his critique of political economy as ‘neganthropology’ in relation to what I describe as neganthropic institutions. A full explanation of Stiegler’s positive project of neganthroplogy is offered through an inherent critique of Friedrich Hayek’s economic theory and of his view on institutions. I show that Hayek’s approach to institutions largely stems from his understanding of the theory of biological evolution, which is fundamentally flawed because it neglects the question of entropy with regard to the organisation of the living in general and of the human species in particular.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

32

Kim, Jae-Hee. "TRANSINDIVIDUALITY AND POST-LABOR BASED ON SIMONDON AND STIEGLER". Kriterion: Revista de Filosofia 60, n.º 143 (agosto de 2019): 319–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/0100-512x2019n14305jhk.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

ABSTRACT This article aims to elucidate a philosophical foundation of a post-labor paradigm through the transindividual technical-psychic-collective culture based on Gilbert Simondon and Bernard Stiegler. Simondon predicts that the problem of the alienation of labor due to mechanical industrialization can be overcome through the spread of post-industrial technical culture based on both technical mentality and information technology (IT). In contrast, Stiegler claims that, along with information networks, hyper-industrialization rather than post-industrialization has arrived and that, in order to recover human values in a machine empire devoid of caring, the strengthening of the ability for non-automation based on automaticity is necessary. However, Simondon’s technical culture beyond labor implies a posthumanistic vision in that it assumes the capacity of technology to mediate between the preindividual and the transindividual beyond technical instrumentalism, which is anthropocentric, and opens up transductive relationships among humans and non-humans. I will argue that Stiegler’s urgent proposal that seeks to save human life from the control of a techno-capital system, such as the reinvention of work transcending employment, must be concretized within the Simondonian posthumanistic project.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

33

Senatore, Mauro. "Engram: Derrida's Reply to Stiegler". Paragraph 45, n.º 3 (novembro de 2022): 351–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/para.2022.0409.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

This article focuses on two indices from Geschlecht III session XIII: (1) an apparently insignificant reference to Stiegler and (2) the recourse to the concept of the engram as a trope of other grammatological figures that are more frequent in Derrida's work. By interweaving these indexes together, the article suggests that Derrida's text can be read as a noteworthy stage in his ongoing dialogue with Bernard Stiegler surrounding the question posed by human evolution to any accounts of the history of life. Along this path, the article inscribes Derrida's (en-)grammatological history of life within the line of thought that goes from Richard Semon's engram theory to Simona Ginsburg and Eva Jablonka's contemporary re-elaboration of this theory. In doing so, it argues that, although for Stiegler Derrida's grammatology aligns with biological reductionism, the latter may provide the theoretical framework for current evolutionary accounts of life as plasticity.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

34

Krieg, C. Parker. "‘By Means Other Than Life’". Con Texte 2, n.º 1 (17 de outubro de 2018): 22–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.28984/ct.v2i1.276.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

This essay argues that literature can help us understand posthuman dimensions of memory. Drawing on Bernard Stiegler’s philosophical anthropology of technics, and from the field of cultural memory studies, this new materialist approach challenges the conception of posthumanism that describes contemporary technologies as “transcending” the human. Rather, I maintain that an immanent perspective situates the human as already existing outside of itself, “by means other than life,” as Stiegler puts it. I illustrate this with two examples from postcolonial literature that model an affirmational approach to traumatic material history by way of texts. Instead of posing as detachment or transcendence, these metafictional references foreground present continuities with the past, recovering that which has been forgotten or repressed.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

35

Turner, Ben. "Life and the Technical Transformation of Différance: Stiegler and the Noopolitics of Becoming Non-Inhuman". Derrida Today 9, n.º 2 (novembro de 2016): 177–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/drt.2016.0132.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

Through a re-articulation of Derridean différance, Bernard Stiegler claims that the human is defined by an originary default that displaces all psychic and social life onto technical supplements. His philosophy of technics re-articulates the logic of the supplement as concerning both human reflexivity and its supports, and the history of the différance of life itself. This has been criticised for reducing Derrida's work to a metaphysics of presence, and for instituting a humanism of the relation to the inorganic. By refuting these claims, this article will show that Stiegler's doubling of différance enables him to articulate the human as constituted by both the individuation characteristic of ‘life’, and that of a technical, psychic, and collective individuation. Putting forward a reading of the logic of the trace in life, and emphasising the aspects of Leroi-Gourhan, Simondon, and Canguilhem that Stiegler uses in his reading of Derrida, I will demonstrate that the political stakes of adaption and adoption in his Noopolitics require this re-articulation of différance. Technics shapes the human future, arising from this differential mutation; marking the invention of the human as the site of the political.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

36

Dunker, Anders. "En mulig omstart for verdenssystemet. Intervju med Bernard Stiegler". Samtiden 127, n.º 02 (7 de junho de 2019): 82–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.18261/issn1890-0690-2019-02-12.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

37

Claeys, Sébastien. "Recension critique de l’ouvrage. Dans la disruption (Bernard Stiegler)". Revue française d'éthique appliquée N° 4, n.º 2 (2017): 126. http://dx.doi.org/10.3917/rfeap.004.0126.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

38

Sasidharan, Rakesh. "Book Review: Bernard Stiegler, The Lost Spirit of Capitalism". Political Studies Review 15, n.º 2 (13 de março de 2017): 267–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1478929917695309.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

39

Lindberg, Susanna. "Politics of digital learning—Thinking education with Bernard Stiegler". Educational Philosophy and Theory 52, n.º 4 (16 de abril de 2019): 384–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00131857.2019.1586531.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

40

Ross, Daniel. "Introduction to Bernard Stiegler, “The National Front and Ultraliberalism” (Extract from Pharmacologie du Front National, 2013)". Cultural Politics 18, n.º 2 (1 de julho de 2022): 119–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/17432197-9716196.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

Abstract The French philosopher Bernard Stiegler published Pharmacologie du Front national in 2013. It is above all a response to the 2012 French presidential election, which, despite the election of François Hollande, gave evidence of the rising influence of the far-right National Front, and thus of a growing regressive tendency in the politics of the Western representative democracies. But Stiegler's concern in this regard can be traced back to his first book and is present throughout his work, which has always been concerned with the positive technical (default of) origin of the conjunction of desire and knowledge, and the irreducibility of the tendency for these to be undermined by what he will call the negative pharmacological side of technics. In Pharmacologie du Front national, he draws attention to a third dimension of the pharmakon: its tendency to lead to the designation of the pharmakos, or the scapegoat, as that negative side takes hold. For Stiegler, the industrial populism characteristic of today's consumerist economico-technological model inevitably and dangerously leads to political populism. He thus calls for a new critique of ideology, one that returns to its starting point in Marx and Engels, overcomes the limitations of Marxist and Althusserian materialisms that ultimately remain grounded in an oppositional metaphysics, and provides new practical and conceptual weapons in the struggle against contemporary ideology, whose essential motto is that “there is no alternative.”

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

41

Celis Bueno, Claudio. "La economía de la atención: del ciber-tiempo al tiempo cinemático". Hipertextos 8, n.º 14 (2 de fevereiro de 2021): 59–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.24215/23143924e019.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

Este artículo examina la dimensión temporal de la economía de la atención utilizando la noción de tiempo cinemático de Bernard Stiegler. La economía de la atención es un concepto forjado dentro del campo de la economía política para explicar el creciente valor de la atención en un mundo abundante en información. Esto implica una creciente discrepancia entre la finitud del tiempo humano requerido para prestar atención y procesar la información disponible, y la velocidad inhumana a la que fluye y se acumula dicha información. El problema con esta definición de la temporalidad de la economía de la atención es que naturaliza una noción dada de tiempo humano que luego es utilizada para evaluar los efectos negativos de las tecnologías de la información. En este sentido, el tiempo humano es propuesto como un concepto privado de cualquier tipo de transformación histórica. Contrariamente a esta definición de la temporalidad de la economía de la atención, este artículo utiliza el concepto de tiempo cinemático de Bernard Stiegler para examinar cómo el tiempo humano y el ciber-tiempo se constituyen mutuamente.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

42

Ross, Daniel. "Care and Carelessness in the Anthropocene". Cultural Politics 17, n.º 2 (1 de julho de 2021): 145–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1215/17432197-8947851.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

Abstract This article proposes dividing Bernard Stiegler's work into three phases, and that a notion of care develops and deepens as these phases progress. To each of these phases there corresponds a particular relationship to Heidegger's thought: 1) the Heidegger of Being and Time who denies the role of technics in the opening of the possibility of authentic time; 2) as a thinker of the “they” who corrects Simondon's inability to think collective disindividuation while being himself unable to think a genuine collective individuation process; 3) the later Heidegger who indeed approaches the most mysterious and unsettling aspect of tekhnē and who foresees the most threatening aspect of Gestell as a world in which Dasein loses its privilege as the questioning being. Yet this third Heidegger also failed to reflect on what Stiegler puts at the heart of the thought of his third phase: the question of entropy, understood as describing fundamental but diverse thermodynamic, biological, and informational tendencies. For Stiegler, taking care in the Anthropocene necessarily entails reinscribing philosophical concepts, including that of Ereignis, in relation to entropy, anthropy, and the struggle against them. Beyond Heidegger, this also entails addressing the obsolescence and self-destructiveness of the current macroeconomic model.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

43

Macraigne, Steve, María Daniela Parra Bernal e Sergio Néstor Osorio García. "La invención del hombre desde la exteriorización tecno-lógica: una relación asimétrica". Cuadernos de Filosofía Latinoamericana 39, n.º 119 (1 de julho de 2018): 215–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.15332/25005375.5057.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

Uno de los problemas centrales que el filósofo francés Bernard Stiegler ha abordado para sostener una constitución tecno- lógica de la humanidad, es la cuestión del origen del hombre. El asunto recae en preguntarse si es posible pensar quién es el hombre desde esta tesis, sin volver a la metafísica o la filosofía trascendental. Esta posición ha de estar enraizada en una ontología que aprehenda el componente causal a nivel relacional, dejando de lado las explicaciones en las cuales la causa es substancialista. Para dar desarrollo a esta propuesta, este artículo se compone de dos partes generales: la primera está destinada a presentar hasta dónde sigue y en dónde se separa Stiegler de la concepción zoo-antropológica de André Leroi-Gourhan sobre el origen del hombre; para luego explicar las bases epistemológicas y ontológicas sobre las que Stiegler erige sus tesis tecno-ontológica de la humanidad; a saber: los fundamentos de la transducción simondoniana y la diferancia derridiana.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

44

Rivera Hutinel, Marcela. "Tecno-génesis y antropo-génesis en Bernard Stiegler: O de la mano que inventa al hombre. / Techno-genesis and anthropo-genesis in the work of Bernard Stiegler: Or how the hand invent the human." Revista Liminales. Escritos sobre Psicología y Sociedad 2, n.º 03 (1 de abril de 2013): 43–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.54255/lim.vol2.num03.228.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

A partir de una revisión de la lectura del Discurso sobre el origen de la desigualdad que Bernard Stiegler propone en La técnica y el tiempo, y que establece un diálogo explícito con el abordaje deconstructivo que Jacques Derrida hace de la obra de Rousseau en De la gramatología, el presente ensayo procura reflexionar sobre el modo en que la tradición metafísica ha denegado el problema de la técnica, obturando la pregunta por el nexo entre la historia del hombre y la historia de sus prótesis. Desde esta matriz deconstructiva de pensamiento de la técnica, se intenta pensar que la mano no pertenece simplemente al hombre, no es mano «humana», sin que el hombre sea a su vez un producto, una invención de la mano. In the text Technic and Time, Bernard Stiegler proposes a reading of Discourse about the origin of inequality establishing an explicit dialogue with the deconstructive approach that Jacques Derrida makes of the work of Rousseau in the his Grammatology. From a reading of the Stigler’s text, in this essay I intend to think about the way in which metaphysical tradition has denies the problem of technique by opening the inquiry for the relationship between the history of mankind and the history of its prosthesis. From the deconstructive matrix developed by Derrida and Stiegler on the thinking about technique, this essay proposes to think on that the hand not simply belongs to a man, not just a “human hand”, but man is also its product, a hand’s invention.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

45

Rivera Hutinel, Marcela. "Tecno-génesis y antropo-génesis en Bernard Stiegler: O de la mano que inventa al hombre. / Techno-genesis and anthropo-genesis in the work of Bernard Stiegler: Or how the hand invent the human." Revista Liminales. Escritos sobre Psicología y Sociedad 2, n.º 03 (1 de abril de 2013): 43–58. http://dx.doi.org/10.54255/lim.vol2.num03.228.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

A partir de una revisión de la lectura del Discurso sobre el origen de la desigualdad que Bernard Stiegler propone en La técnica y el tiempo, y que establece un diálogo explícito con el abordaje deconstructivo que Jacques Derrida hace de la obra de Rousseau en De la gramatología, el presente ensayo procura reflexionar sobre el modo en que la tradición metafísica ha denegado el problema de la técnica, obturando la pregunta por el nexo entre la historia del hombre y la historia de sus prótesis. Desde esta matriz deconstructiva de pensamiento de la técnica, se intenta pensar que la mano no pertenece simplemente al hombre, no es mano «humana», sin que el hombre sea a su vez un producto, una invención de la mano. In the text Technic and Time, Bernard Stiegler proposes a reading of Discourse about the origin of inequality establishing an explicit dialogue with the deconstructive approach that Jacques Derrida makes of the work of Rousseau in the his Grammatology. From a reading of the Stigler’s text, in this essay I intend to think about the way in which metaphysical tradition has denies the problem of technique by opening the inquiry for the relationship between the history of mankind and the history of its prosthesis. From the deconstructive matrix developed by Derrida and Stiegler on the thinking about technique, this essay proposes to think on that the hand not simply belongs to a man, not just a “human hand”, but man is also its product, a hand’s invention.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

46

Marchart, Oliver. "Antagonism and Technicity: Bernard Stiegler on Eris, Stasis and Polemos". New Formations 77, n.º 77 (1 de dezembro de 2012): 150–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.3898/newf.77.09.2012.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

47

Hughes, Robert. "Bernard Stiegler, Philosophical Amateur, or, Individuation from Eros to Philia". diacritics 42, n.º 1 (2014): 46–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/dia.2014.0003.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

48

Crogan, Patrick. "Knowledge, Care, and Trans-Individuation: An Interview with Bernard Stiegler". Cultural Politics: an International Journal 6, n.º 2 (1 de julho de 2010): 157–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.2752/175174310x12672016548207.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

49

Watt, Calum. "The legend of Saint Alan: Larnaudie and Stiegler in the Oversight Committee Room". French Cultural Studies 31, n.º 3 (20 de março de 2020): 173–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0957155819874750.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

Ten years on from the 2008 global financial crisis, this article sets in dialogue two French treatments – by the novelist Mathieu Larnaudie and the philosopher Bernard Stiegler – of footage of the 2008 testimony of Alan Greenspan, former chairman of the US Federal Reserve, before the United States House of Representatives Committee on Oversight and Government Reform. The article introduces and compares the concepts of ‘effondrement’ and ‘prolétarisation’ developed by the two writers in relation to the Greenspan hearing, and analyses how both understand the question of ideology as it emerges in the hearing. Informed by interviews conducted by the author with Larnaudie and Stiegler, the piece concludes by discussing the notion common to both writers that Greenspan is a ‘saint’ of the crisis.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

50

Paláu Castaño, Luis Alfonso. "Industria relacional y economía de la contribución". Ciencias Sociales y Educación 9, n.º 17 (1 de julho de 2020): 237–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.22395/csye.v9n17a11.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

Bernard Stiegler «La transformación de los modos de vida que se puso en funcionamiento desde comienzos del siglo XX con las public relations, que debían conducir a lo que luego de la Segunda Guerra Mundial se llamó marketing, constituirá una verdadera factura de las existencias individuales y colectivas por parte de las industrias de servicios, cuyas primeras y principales fueron las industrias culturales.»

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

Artigos de revistas sobre o tema "Bernard Stiegler"

Crie uma referência precisa em APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, e outros estilos