Bibliografias temáticas / EU CFSP

Índice

Artigos de revistas
Teses / dissertações
Livros
Capítulos de livros
Trabalhos de conferências

Literatura científica selecionada sobre o tema "EU CFSP"

Autor: Grafiati

Publicado: 4 de junho de 2021

Última modificação: 1 de fevereiro de 2022

Crie uma referência precisa em APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, e outros estilos

Selecione um tipo de fonte:

Consulte a lista de atuais artigos, livros, teses, anais de congressos e outras fontes científicas relevantes para o tema "EU CFSP".

Ao lado de cada fonte na lista de referências, há um botão "Adicionar à bibliografia". Clique e geraremos automaticamente a citação bibliográfica do trabalho escolhido no estilo de citação de que você precisa: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

Você também pode baixar o texto completo da publicação científica em formato .pdf e ler o resumo do trabalho online se estiver presente nos metadados.

Artigos de revistas sobre o assunto "EU CFSP"

Missiroli, Antonio. "EU Enlargement and CFSP/ESDP". Journal of European Integration 25, n.º 1 (janeiro de 2003): 1–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0703633031000077190.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

Sertan, AKBABA. "Measuring EU actorness through CFSP and ESDP: civilian power EU". Ankara Avrupa Calismalari Dergisi 8, n.º 2 (2009): 1–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1501/avraras_0000000245.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

Crowe, Brian. "Towards a European Foreign Policy". Hague Journal of Diplomacy 1, n.º 1 (2006): 107–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/187119006x101843.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

AbstractThe Balkans have been the crucible of the EU's Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP). In the 1990s the appointment of David (Lord) Owen as a strong representative to manage the EU's Bosnian policy, the sidelining of the EU itself by the Contact Group, and American dominance at Dayton (what price 'this is the hour of Europe'?) and over Kosovo were important precursors to the important European Council decisions in June 1999 to appoint a high-profile international statesman as High Representative for the CFSP and to create the EU's own military capability in European Security and Defence Policy (ESDP). The Constitutional Treaty's further provisions, notably replacing the Presidency in external relations, will be sorely missed and will need to be brought back.ESDP is developing well, if modestly, and making a genuine contribution, mostly with a strong civ-mil component, in several parts of the world. The CFSP itself seems to be managing quite well. But the EU is not yet set up for serious 'events' or crisis management. Experience shows, and greater recognition is needed, that the EU (probably even with an EU Foreign Minister) needs to be represented by member states that carry conviction to outside interlocutors: some member states are inevitably more equal and carry greater weight than others, even if all have an equal voice. Since EU foreign policy is in large measure inescapably a function of US foreign policy, member states need to have a better common understanding among themselves about the nature of the transatlantic relationship. It will take confidence in the efficacy of the CFSP, to which all must give greater priority, before those member states that have alternatives will accept being bound to conducting their foreign policy (or being represented in the UN Security Council) through Brussels. at will take time and effort.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

Zelyova, Nadia. "Restrictive measures - sanctions compliance, implementation and judicial review challenges in the common foreign and security policy of the European Union". ERA Forum 22, n.º 1 (31 de março de 2021): 159–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12027-021-00658-6.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

AbstractThis article provides a comprehensive overview of EU restrictive measures applicable within the EU, the competences and legal evolution which lead to the implementation of Common Foreign and Security Policy restrictive measures (CFSP sanctions), and considers procedural issues, developments in the latest case law, and the challenges of securing compliance with EU sanctions, which reach beyond the territory of the EU.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

Pomorska, Karolina. "The Impact of Enlargement: Europeanization of Polish Foreign Policy? Tracking Adaptation and Change in the Polish Ministry of Foreign Affairs". Hague Journal of Diplomacy 2, n.º 1 (2007): 25–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/187119007x180467.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

AbstractThis article analyses the process of adaptation of the Polish Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MFA) to EU membership and participation in CFSP, both before and after EU accession. It addresses changes in organizational structure, but also in institutional culture and everyday practices. Despite the initial ambiguity, Polish decision-makers tend to perceive CFSP as an opportunity rather than a constraint on national foreign policy. It is argued that the turning point of the Europeanization process took place in 2003, when Poland became an active observer to the EU and its diplomats were allowed to attend meetings inside the Council. The article also identifies and analyses the gaps in experience and knowledge between the diplomats posted to Brussels and those that stayed in Warsaw. Finally, it examines the various challenges that EU membership held for the MFA and how they have been dealt with so far.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

Wessel, Ramses A. "The Dynamics of the European Union Legal Order: An Increasingly Coherent Framework of Action and Interpretation". European Constitutional Law Review 5, n.º 1 (fevereiro de 2009): 117–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1574019609001175.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

Institutional and normative convergence – Common Foreign and Security Policy – Pillar Structure – External Relations – Role of the Court – Normative Consistency – EU Legal Order – Legal Nature CFSP – Treaty of Lisbon – Legal Instruments – Decision-Making

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

Oleksiy, Kresin. "Institutional mechanism of EU peacekeeping". Yearly journal of scientific articles “Pravova derzhava”, n.º 31 (2020): 397–407. http://dx.doi.org/10.33663/0869-2491-2020-31-397-407.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

The aggression of the Russian Federation against Ukraine, which has been going on for more than five years, has led to irreparable losses – the deaths of thousands of our country's defenders and civilians, immensely more people being maimed, tortured and inhumane, deprived of their housing and means of subsistence. The losses of infrastructure, economy and culture of the country are enormous. It is no exaggeration to say that the very existence of Ukraine as a sovereign state has been questioned, and the political, social, economic, psychological trauma already inflicted by Russian aggression will be felt for a very long time – not for years, but for generations. But the biggest challenge for Ukraine is that the algorithm for stopping aggression and restoring the territorial integrity of the state has not yet been invented. The use of international peacekeeping mechanisms is considered by many Ukrainian and foreign experts to be one of the means of achieving this goal. This prompts an appeal to the study of the institutional mechanism of the European Union's peacekeeping activity, as an organization actively involved in counteracting Russian aggression in Ukraine and having significant peacekeeping experience. The paper demonstrates that the institutional structure of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) has evolved for the most part over the last ten years (after the entry into force of the 2007 Lisbon Treaty) and is still partly in the making and cannot be considered as complete. The author argues that the CFSP in general, and in particular the Common Security and Defense Policy, is provided by both intergovernmental and supranational institutions, but decision-making and partly their implementation remain intergovernmental and require consensus on fundamental issues and the achievement of a complex qualified majority in their implementation, while common organs in this area is just of an executive nature.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

Eisenhut, Dominik. "Delimitation of EU-Competences under the First and Second Pillar: A View BetweenECOWASand the Treaty of Lisbon". German Law Journal 10, n.º 5 (1 de maio de 2009): 585–604. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s2071832200001231.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

Since the European Union (EU) agreed upon the extension of its activities to the fields of foreign, security, and criminal policy in the Maastricht Treaty, the question of the delimitation of those new areas of EU competence towards the “classical” policies under the Treaty of the European Community (TEC) has been present. The broad and rather vague scope of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) in the so-called second pillar of the EU and the area of political cooperation covered by the third pillar presents several uncertainties. One such uncertainty is the relationship between the supranational legal order under the TEC and the more intergovernmental and diplomacy-based cooperation under the Treaty on the European Union (TEU). Although the EU was organized within a single institutional structure, the substantial differences with regard to voting procedures, competences of the European Court of Justice (ECJ) and the role of the European Commission rendered a clear separation of competences under the different pillars compulsory: CFSP remains beyond the jurisdiction of the ECJ; the Commission and the European Parliament have only marginal rights of participation; and the legal obligations under the second pillar cannot claim supremacy over national law or direct effect.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

Ruacan, Ipek. "A Study in State Socialization: Turkey’s EU Accession and CFSP". Southeast European and Black Sea Studies 7, n.º 4 (dezembro de 2007): 573–90. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/14683850701726047.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

Hillion, Christophe. "Adaptation for autonomy? Candidates for EU membership and the CFSP". Global Affairs 3, n.º 3 (27 de maio de 2017): 265–75. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/23340460.2017.1415505.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

Mais fontes

Teses / dissertações sobre o assunto "EU CFSP"

Hadvabova, Jana. "Contentious Issues of Foreign Policy in EU Negotiations. : Merging Liberal Intergovernmentalism and Negotiation Theory". Thesis, Linköping University, Department of Management and Economics, 2006. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-5499.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

An elementary precondition for the EU Member States to act coherently in the field of foreign policy is to reach a common standpoint on particular issues of the CFSP. Due to the intergovernmental character of decision-making in the sphere of the CFSP, the Member States reach a common position primarily through negotiations. In this regard the thesis focuses on an analysis of the EC/U Member States negotiations about two politically highly controversial foreign policy issues – the Yugoslav recognition crisis of 1991 and the Iraqi crisis of 2002/2003.

Developing a theoretical model of analysis based on merging Moravcsik’s liberal intergovernmentalism and negotiation analysis the author seeks to examine and explain the outcomes of these negotiations, while emphasising the necessity to view negotiation as a process throughout which a variation in certain factors can occur and hence influence the outcomes of negotiation in a decisive way.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

Nilsson, Viktoria. "EU Counterterrorist Sanctions and Individual Rights : An Examination of the Potential Difference in Level of Protection within the AFSJ and CFSP". Thesis, Uppsala universitet, Juridiska institutionen, 2015. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-250278.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

The AFSJ is an area of law developed through the purpose of creating and withholding internal security and justice. This area is of vast importance due to both the realization of an internal market and a Union without internal borders. The CFSP is an area dealing with foreign policy, thus focusing on the security, defense and diplomatic action relating to third countries. There are extensive constitutional differences between the two areas of law. In terms of individual protection, the AFSJ has as one of the main purposes to provide the Union with an effective judicial system, where the right for a fair trial has a central role. In the CFSP, on the other hand, the original premise is that there is no protection for the individual. The main idea is that political aims concerning security and other relations to third countries governs the CFSP and triumph other aspects such as individual rights. Thus, individual rights have had a different development within the two areas. The protection has, however, developed in both of the areas, especially since the introduction of the Lisbon Treaty. The Kadi I case have had a vast impact on this development and showed that there used to be a lack of a clear legal basis for the adoption of counterterrorist sanctions and also noted the lack of judicial protection for the individuals. The case showed that the EU did not satisfy fundamental human rights. The Lisbon Treaty introduced two explicit legal bases in Articles 75 and 215 TFEU. This work shows, that the pre-existing problems concerning the legal basis still exist due to the unclear scope of application for the two articles. This renders problems of constitutional character and harms the effectiveness of the counterterrorist policy. The Bamba case shows, that there is a difference in level of protection within Article 215 TFEU. The case did not concern counterterrorism measures but still has an impact on the overall impression of the level of the protection within the CFSP. This case further shows that counterterrorism is a field that is highly influenced by the AFSJ. The seemingly strong emphasis of individual rights within this area could, thus, in connection to the strong link between the AFSJ and the CFSP in terms of terrorism, have lead to a higher level of rights that otherwise don’t exists within the CFSP. To conclude, even if there is no stated difference in level of protection, it has been shown that a practical difference in level of protection does in fact exist.
Området för frihet, säkerhet och rättvisa (AFSJ) har utvecklats utifrån syftet att skapa och upprätthålla intern säkerhet och rättvisa. Detta område är således betydelsefullt för skapandet av en fungerande inre marknad och av en Union utan inre gränser. Området för en gemensam utrikes- och säkerhetspolitik (GUSP) är ett område som hanterar EUs externa relationer, med fokus på säkerhet och diplomatiska förbindelser. Det råder stora konstitutionella skillnader områdena emellan. I fråga om individers rättigheter, så utgör dessa, inom ramen för en straffrättslig kontext, ett utav AFSJs mest grundläggande syften. Inom GUSP däremot, har utgångspunkten varit att det inte finns något rättsligt skydd för individen. Det övergripande syftet inom GUSP uppnås i huvudsak genom politiska mål gällande relationerna till tredje länder, där skyddet för individen prioriteras bort. Individens rättigheter har således haft en olik utgångspunkt inom de respektive områdena. Skyddet för individen har dock utvecklats inom såväl AFSJ som inom GUSP, framförallt sedan Lissabonfördragets ikraftträdande. Kadi I-fallet har haft stor betydelse för utvecklingen av individens skydd i terroristsammanhang och visade på avsaknaden av en tydlig rättslig grund som fanns inom EU, samt det bristfälliga individskydd som rådde. Fallet visade att EU inte upprätthöll grundläggande skydd för individen. Lissabonfördraget introducerade två uttryckliga rättsliga grunder för antagandet av anti-terroristsanktioner: artiklarna 75 och 215 TFEU. Detta arbete visar att de problem som fanns gällande de rättsliga grunderna innan Lissabonfördragets ikraftträdande, fortfarande i viss mån lever kvar, då artiklarna har ett vagt tillämpningsområde. Detta skapar konstitutionella problem och motverkar effektiviteten av anti-terroristarbetet. Bamba-fallet visar att det råder en skillnad i nivån av individens rättigheter inom artikel 215 TFEU. Fallet rör inte anti-terroristsanktioner, men kan likväl påverka helhetssynen av individens skydd inom GUSP. Vidare belyser fallet AFSJs höga grad av påverkan av anti-terroristarbetet, vilket tyder på att AFSJ har en inverkan även på nivån av individskyddet inom GUSP. Även om det inte finns en uttrycklig nivåskillnad så kan en skillnad utrönas i praktiken.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

Bohatová, Martina. "Neutralita Švédska jako členského státu EU". Master's thesis, Vysoká škola ekonomická v Praze, 2010. http://www.nusl.cz/ntk/nusl-74716.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

Sweden is currently viewed as a small country of North Europe. However, it can be proud of a long historical tradition with a number of political successes -- the fact that there has not been a war for more than two hundred years due to neutrality can be considered as the biggest one. The neutrality is perceived as a politico-security conception. The thesis tries to sum up the perception of Swedish neutrality, to chart its changes in time and to measure its compatibility with the EU membership through the observation of the Swedish foreign policy, the participation in Common Foreign and Security Policy, Common Security and Defence Policy and the preparation of the EU Council Presidency. The aim is to confirm the hypothesis that Sweden is due to changes in the perception of neutrality concept the full member of the European Union also in such complex things as Common Foreign and Security Policy and the Common Security and Defence Policy.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

Petersson, Emmy. "The EU Foreign Policy". Thesis, Halmstad University, School of Social and Health Sciences (HOS), 2007. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hh:diva-1015.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

This dissertations aims to examine the EU Foreign Policy, and more precisely map the High Representative (HR) and his impact on the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) in the EU. Using two theoretical frameworks, leadership theory and institutional theory, the study tests the explanatory power of these theories to explain the HR and his impact on the CFSP. The study is limited to a period of time, from November 2002 until December 2003, when several different events took place within the framework of the CFSP. The conclusion indicates that both leadership theory and institutional theory can help explain the development and outcomes of the CFSP.

Keywords: EU foreign policy, Common Foreign and Security Policy, High Representative of the CFSP, European Security and Defence Policy, Iraq war, European Security Strategy

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

Lerer, Iotam Andrea. "Providing Arms and Weapons to Parties Involved in Civil Wars: The Legal Framework for EU Member States". Doctoral thesis, Università degli studi di Trento, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/11572/273793.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

At a time when the majority of conflicts are non-international, providing arms to the legitimate government or to the opposition forces may influence and even determine the outcome of a civil war. It is, therefore, not surprising that such a provision is subject to a web of rules. This dissertation focuses on those applicable to the EU Member States, which arise from international, European, and domestic law. Sanctions regimes are an integral part of this legal framework. Of primary importance are, naturally, sanctions adopted by the Security Council under Chapter VII, but also the more controversial EU restrictive measures are accounted for. The dissertation aims to clarify to whom EU Member States can legally provide arms and weapons during a civil war. This investigation is justified also in light of the positions adopted by individual EU Member States vis-a-vis the conflicts in Libya, Syria, and Yemen, three conflicts particularly relevant in political and economic terms for the EU and its Member States. By analysing these three case studies and putting the whole legal framework to the test the dissertation sheds light on how EU Member States justify their intervention. The adoption of these specific case studies allows for the assessment of their positions both when they provide arms to parties that intervene on request of the legitimate government and when they provide support to opposition forces. Despite being EU Member States subject to common European rules on arms exports and being all party to the Arms Trade Treaty, their practice is far from uniform. The result of these differences is far-reaching and has an impact not only on the civil war where the arms are provided but also on the EU.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

Jonshult, Patrick. "LEGAL BASIS CONFLICTS REGARDING EU EXTERNAL ACTIONS : Upholding the key properties of the CFSP and the AFSJ provisions when negotiating and concluding international agreements". Thesis, Uppsala universitet, Juridiska institutionen, 2015. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-266941.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

Since the competence provided in the CFSP and the AFSJ areas in certain situation can overlap, issues have arisen in the recent case law and literature concerning the choice of legal basis. The provisions of the two policy areas concern important international areas and the institutional balance, which is based on what legal basis is chosen, leads to a number of institutional consequences such as division of power between the Member states and the Union’s institutions. The idea behind this paper is to display an ample and just picture of a complicated situation in order to highlight the issues at hand that have arisen due to the complexness of the legal framework. If one of the policy areas are chosen as the correct legal basis, different rules in the treaty applies, which leads to different distribution of power since different institutions in EU play different roles depending on legal basis. The purpose of this work is therefore to analyse the external dimension of the AFSJ and the CFSP rules and examine how the correct legal basis can be determined by the legislator at the same time as the Member States and the EU’s ability to fulfil their objectives and goals is not undermined.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

Fält, Lovina. "EU:s kamp mot terrorism : En kvalitativ textanalys om unionens samordning av RIF och GUSP till följd av terror". Thesis, Linnéuniversitetet, Institutionen för statsvetenskap (ST), 2020. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-96085.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

This essay examines the institutional coherence between the European Union’s Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) and the field of Justice and Home Affairs (JHA), in order to combat jihadist terrorism. Coordinated instruments between the two policy areas are vital in order to maintain internal security within the European Union (EU) in its war against terrorism. However, as a result of several terrorist attacks in 2015, discussions surrounding the disintegration of the union have increased. This is paradoxical when looking at the strengthening of CFSP, an intergovernmental policy area, after 2015. By analysing the measures taken by the EU to counter terrorism in the wake of the terror attacks in Paris and Brussels in 2015 and 2016, it shows that CFSP-actors are becoming increasingly important in developing EU’s anti-terror policy. The result mainly concerns intelligence sharing and formal diplomacy, which blurs the boundaries between internal and external security. The result was achieved through a qualitative theory-consuming case study using neo-functionalism as a theory. The following research questions were asked: ‘’Has the CFSP, together with the JHA, been coordinated in a supranational manner to counter future terrorism in the wake of the terror attacks in Paris and Brussels 2015-2016?’’ and ‘’What driving forces can be identified for, or against, a supranational policy between the JHA and CFSP, from a neo-functional perspective?’’

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

Nilsson, Simone. "Ömsesidighet som skapande av inflytande i EU? : En idéanalytisk fallstudie om småstaters inflytande över beslutsprocessen i GUSP". Thesis, Linnéuniversitetet, Institutionen för statsvetenskap (ST), 2017. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-64940.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

This thesis studies the impact of small states in the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) in EU. The organisation of EU contains an interdependent power relationship between all countries. The aim of this study is to examine how this interdependence affect the influence of small states. Two theoretical framework are used. The first by Robert Keohane och Joseph Nye that developed the theoretical definition of interdependence, while the second one by Søren Christensen and his definition of direct and indirect power. The analytical model contains four hypothesis concerning asymmetrical and vulnerable interdependence, as well as direct- and indirect power. Through a case study of Sweden and Finland the conclusion is that small states have influence in CFSP, but it is limited due to bigger states with much more resources and the geographical position of the countries that creats asymmetrical interdependence. However, Sweden and Finland have influence in the decision-making in CFSP through vulnerable interdependence because of their many international defence cooperations with different organizations that strengthen their national position in the international political system. Also, the formal process of decision-making in CFSP enable direct and indirect power of small states. Therefore, the final conclusion is that small states have influence in CFSP even though is its limited in some aspects.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

Gross, Eva. "The Europeanization of foreign policy? : the role of the EU CFSP/ESDP in crisis decision-making in Macedonia and Afghanistan". Thesis, London School of Economics and Political Science (University of London), 2007. http://etheses.lse.ac.uk/2934/.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

Gair, Jonathan Mark. "Evaluating EU-Russian Relations: The Intersection of Variable Geometry and Power Pragmatism". Miami University Honors Theses / OhioLINK, 2009. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc_num=muhonors1240442669.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

Mais fontes

Livros sobre o assunto "EU CFSP"

EU external relations and systems of governance: The CFSP, Euro-Mediterranean partnership and migration. New York, NY: Routledge, 2009.

Encontre o texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

Goetschel, Laurent. Power and identity: Small states and the common foreign and security policy (CFSP) of the EU : study in NRP "Foreign policy". Bern: Sekretariat Nationalfonds, 2000.

Encontre o texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

The CFSP/ESDP after enlargement: A bigger EU=a stronger EU? Wien: Diplomatische Akademie Wien, 2003.

Encontre o texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

Hiski, Haukkala, Medvedev Sergei, Ulkopoliittinen Instituutti (Finland) e Institut für Europäische Politik, eds. The EU Common Strategy on Russia: Learning the grammar of the CFSP. Helsinki, Finland: Ulkopoliittinen instituutti, 2001.

Encontre o texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

Kilpatrick, Claire, e Joanne Scott, eds. Contemporary Challenges to EU Legality. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192898050.001.0001.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

This volume explores contemporary challenges to EU legality, including actions or activities that cast doubt on, or sit uncomfortably with, the premises, principles, and norms that underpin the EU’s legal order as proclaimed by the Treaties and the authoritative judgments of the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU). These premises, principles, and norms range from the precisely formulated to the noticeably vague. The book develops a broader theoretical perspective as well as delving into a range of substantive areas including the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP), the EU’s relationship with international law, migration, human rights, the sovereign debt crisis, and Brexit.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

The Eu As A Global Security Actor A Comprehensive Analysis Beyond Cfsp And Jha. Palgrave MacMillan, 2013.

Encontre o texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

Giegerich, Bastian. 18. Foreign and Security Policy. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hepl/9780199689675.003.0018.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

This chapter examines the gradual development of foreign and security policy cooperation among European Union member states. It begins with a discussion of the hesitant moves from European political cooperation (EPC) to a common foreign and security policy (CFSP), along with the emergence of a common security and defence policy (CSDP) as part of CFSP. It then considers CFSP in the context of eastern enlargement and the significance of the Treaty of Lisbon for EU foreign and security policy. It also looks at the intervention in Iraq and the adoption of a European Security Strategy, as well as CSDP missions and operations. Finally, it analyses the underlying theme of national sovereignty combined with EU-level capacity through a range of examples.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

The Northern Dimension: Fuel for the EU? (Programme on the Northern Dimension of the CFSP). Institut fur Europaische Politik, 2001.

Encontre o texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

Approaching the northern dimension of the CFSP: Challenges and opportunities for the EU in the emerging European security order (Programme on the Northern Dimension of the CFSP). Institut fur Europaische Politik, 1998.

Encontre o texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

Mathias, Jopp, Warjovaara Riku, Ulkopoliittinen Instituutti (Finland) e Institut für Europäische Politik, eds. Approaching the northern dimension of the CFSP: Challenges and opportunities for the EU in the emerging European security order. Helsinki, Finland: Ulkopoliittinen instituutti, 1998.

Encontre o texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

Capítulos de livros sobre o assunto "EU CFSP"

Torun, Zerrin. "From Convergence to Divergence: The Compatibility of Turkish and EU Foreign Policy". In EU-Turkey Relations, 323–46. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-70890-0_13.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

AbstractThis chapter assesses the compatibility of Turkish and EU foreign policies between 1959 and 2020. Based on the analysis of key international developments and Turkey’s alignment with the EU’s Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP), the chapter identifies four periods that were characterized by different degrees of convergence and divergence. In the period between 1959 and 1998 compatibility was relatively high as Turkish foreign policy was guided by the goal of remaining part of the Western community of states throughout the Cold War and its immediate aftermath. Between 1999 and 2002, Turkish foreign policy became regionally more active, in a similar way to that of the EU, but produced few results. The period between 2003 and 2010, up to the Arab Spring, is identified as the ‘golden age’ of compatibility between Turkish and EU foreign policies. Turkey’s prevailing ethos of this period, i.e., relying on soft power and cooperation with neighbors, was generally in line with the EU’s foreign policy approach. Since 2011, divergences between the EU and Turkey have increased, in particular with regard to Syria, Cyprus, and the Eastern Mediterranean. As Turkey defined its norms and interests differently from the EU, its rate of alignment with the EU’s CFSP decreased remarkably. The chapter concludes by looking to the future, arguing that cooperation between the EU and Turkey is likely to focus on issues where there is strong compatibility in selected areas only, such as pandemics, counterterrorism, migration, and energy, and will be primarily based on ad hoc mechanisms.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

Zipperle, Nadine. "General Issues and Practice on EU International Agreements (CFSP and PJC (by Now FSJ) Agreements)". In EU International Agreements, 63–96. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-64078-5_3.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

Lodge, Juliet. "The EU: From Civilian Power to Speaking with a Common Voice — The Transition to a CFSP". In The Transatlantic Relationship, 67–94. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-25157-5_4.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

Hintzen, Geor. "Will Sleeping Beauty Wake up? Proposals for a New EU Global Strategy on CFDP". In Governance and Security Issues of the European Union, 291–306. The Hague: T.M.C. Asser Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-6265-144-9_16.

Texto completo da fonte

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

Wessel, Ramses A. "Legality in EU Common Foreign and Security Policy". In Contemporary Challenges to EU Legality, 71–99. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780192898050.003.0004.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

The Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP) of the EU finds itself between exceptionalism and normalization. Because of its special position and because the legislative procedure is not applicable to this policy area, questions of legality are not usually raised in the context of CFSP. At the same time, CFSP has become a policy area to which most EU rules and principles simply apply. This chapter assesses questions of (the review of) legality in the context of CFSP. As questions of legality make sense only in the context of legal acts, this chapter will first revisit the nature of CFSP acts as well as their consequences in the light of the ‘normalization’ of CFSP. Second, questions of legality will be assessed in relation to the legal basis of CFSP acts, and in particular, the choice of legal basis and the possibility of combining CFSP and other legal bases to enhance options for legality review.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

Bache, Ian, Simon Bulmer, Stephen George e Owen Parker. "26. Common Foreign and Security Policy". In Politics in the European Union, 494–513. Oxford University Press, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hepl/9780199689668.003.0026.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

This chapter examines the European Union’s Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP). From 1993 to 2009, external political relations formed the second pillar of the EU, on CFSP. Although CFSP was officially an intergovernmental pillar, the European Commission came to play an important role. There were serious attempts to strengthen the security and defence aspects of the CFSP in the face of the threats that faced the EU from instability in its neighbouring territories. However, the EU remains far from having a truly supranational foreign policy and its status as a ‘power’ in international relations is debatable. The chapter first provides a historical background on the CFSP, focusing on the creation of the European Political Co-operation (EPC), before discussing the CFSP and the European Security and Defence Policy (ESDP). It concludes with an assessment of EU power and its impact on world politics.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

Wouters, Jan, Frank Hoffmeister, Geert De Baere e Thomas Ramopoulos. "Common Foreign and Security Policy". In The Law of EU External Relations, 359–420. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198869481.003.0010.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

This chapter provides an overview of the historical evolution and the post-Lisbon institutional and legal characteristics of the Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP), including the Common Security and Defence Policy (CSDP). Specific attention is paid to the specificity and sui generis nature of the CFSP as an EU competence and to the instruments at the disposal of the EU under this policy. The limited but growing jurisdiction of the Court of Justice in CFSP is illustrated with recent case law. The legal and institutional underpinnings of the CSDP are discussed, as well as its post-Lisbon dynamics, notably operations, international agreements, permanent structured cooperation, and mutual assistance.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

Peterson, John, e Niklas Helwig. "13. Common foreign and security policy: Institutionalizing Europe’s global role". In Institutions of the European Union. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/hepl/9780198737414.003.0013.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

This chapter examines the European Union’s Common Foreign and Security Policy (CFSP). The CFSP seeks to combine the political weight of EU member states in the pursuit of common goals. However, European foreign policy must integrate a wide range of other policies to be effective. Likewise, any assessment of the EU’s role in global affairs must consider CFSP as one policy within a broader external relations toolkit. This chapter highlights the CFSP’s relative youth (compared to other EU policies), mixed record, and uncertain future. It first provides an overview of the origins of CFSP institutions before discussing the evolution of the CFSP structures. It then describes the CFSP’s instruments and powerss, the EU’s foreign policy record, and the institutions in context. It also looks at theoretical accounts of the CFSP, including institutionalism.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

Klamert, Marcus, Manuel Kellerbauer e Jonathan Tomkin. "Title V General Provisions on the Union’s External Action and Specific Provisions on the Common Foreign and Security Policy". In The EU Treaties and the Charter of Fundamental Rights. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198759393.003.27.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

Title V TEU lays down general provisions on the Union’s external action as well as specific provisions on the CFSP. Chapter 1 of Title V TEU on the general provisions applies to all EU external policies as well as to the external dimension of internal policies. Chapter 2 of Title V TEU applies specifically to CFSP and is further divided into a section on common provisions and a latter section on the CSDP. This structure of the Treaty reveals both the continued duality between CFSP and non-CFSP Union external action as well as a concerted effort to introduce consistency and coherence in Union external action across the board.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

Ramopoulos, Thomas. "Article 27 TEU". In The EU Treaties and the Charter of Fundamental Rights. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198759393.003.37.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

The creation of the dual post of the High Representative who is also a vice-president of the Commission in accordance with Article 18(4) TEU, is among the most important and visible changes that the ToL brought about in EU external relations. Together with the common list of external action principles and objectives in Article 21 TEU, the drafters of the EU Treaties attempted thereby to bridge the gap between CFSP and non-CFSP external policies and internal policies with an external dimension.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

Trabalhos de conferências sobre o assunto "EU CFSP"

Palmieri, Alessandro, e Blerina Nazeraj. "OPEN BANKING AND COMPETITION: AN INTRICATE RELATIONSHIP". In International Jean Monnet Module Conference of EU and Comparative Competition Law Issues "Competition Law (in Pandemic Times): Challenges and Reforms. Faculty of Law, Josip Juraj Strossmayer University of Osijek, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.25234/eclic/18822.

Texto completo da fonte

Resumo:

Open banking – promoted in the European Union by the access to account rule contained in the Directive (EU) 2015/2366 on payment services in the internal market (PSD2) – is supposed to enhance consumer’s welfare and to foster competition. However, many observers are fearful about the negative effects of the entry into the market of the so-called BigTech giants. Unless incumbent banks are able to rise above the technological challenges, the risk is that, in the long run, BigTech firms could dominate the market, by virtue of their great ability to collect data on consumer preferences, and to process them with sophisticated tools, such as Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning techniques; not to mention the possible benefits arising from the cross-subsidisation. This paper aims at analysing the controversial relationship between open banking and competition. In this framework, many aspects must be clarified, such as the definition of the relevant markets; the identification of the dominant entities; the relationship with the essential facility doctrine. The specific competition problems encountered in the financial sector need to be inscribed in the context of the more general debate around access to data in the digital sphere. The evolving scenario poses a serious challenge to regulators, calling them to strike the right balance between fostering innovation and preserving financial stability. The appraisal intends not only to cover EU law and policy, but also to make a comparison with other legal systems. In this respect, something noteworthy is taking place in the United States where, as of today, consumers’ access to financial data sharing has been largely dependent on private-sector efforts. Indeed, Section 1033 of the Dodd-Frank Wall Street Reform and Consumer Protection Act (passed in the aftermath of the financial crisis of 2008) provides that, subject to rules prescribed by the Bureau of Consumer Financial Protection (CFPB), a consumer financial services provider must make available to a consumer information, in its control or possession, concerning the consumer financial product or service that the consumer obtained from the provider. This provision, which dates back to 2010, has never been implemented. However, on 22 October 2020, the CFBP has announced its intention to regulate open banking, issuing an advanced notice of proposed rulemaking. In light of their investigation, the authors advocate the adaptation of the current strategies to the modified conditions and, in some instances, the creation of novel mechanisms, more suitable to face unprecedented threats.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.

Oferecemos descontos em todos os planos premium para autores cujas obras estão incluídas em seleções literárias temáticas. Contate-nos para obter um código promocional único!