Bibliografias temáticas / Politisk argumentation

Índice

  1. Artigos de revistas
  2. Teses / dissertações
  3. Livros
  4. Capítulos de livros

Literatura científica selecionada sobre o tema "Politisk argumentation"

Autor: Grafiati
Publicado: 4 de junho de 2021
Última modificação: 6 de fevereiro de 2022

Crie uma referência precisa em APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, e outros estilos

Selecione um tipo de fonte:

Consulte a lista de atuais artigos, livros, teses, anais de congressos e outras fontes científicas relevantes para o tema "Politisk argumentation".

Ao lado de cada fonte na lista de referências, há um botão "Adicionar à bibliografia". Clique e geraremos automaticamente a citação bibliográfica do trabalho escolhido no estilo de citação de que você precisa: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

Você também pode baixar o texto completo da publicação científica em formato .pdf e ler o resumo do trabalho online se estiver presente nos metadados.

Artigos de revistas sobre o assunto "Politisk argumentation"

1

Lund, Anker Brink. "Klaus Kjøller: Politisk argumentation. En teori om offentlig politisk argumentation i et velfærds-demokrati". MedieKultur: Journal of media and communication research 8, n.º 17 (29 de agosto de 1992): 2. http://dx.doi.org/10.7146/mediekultur.v8i17.914.

Texto completo da fonte
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
2

Olayinka Unuabonah, Foluke. "Argumentation in Nigerian investigative public hearings". Journal of Argumentation in Context 9, n.º 2 (28 de outubro de 2020): 199–218. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/jaic.19004.ola.

Texto completo da fonte
Resumo:
Abstract This paper examines defendants’ argumentative discourse in the 2008 Nigerian investigative public hearings on the Federal Capital Territory administration. The data, which consist of nine defendants’ presentations, are analyzed qualitatively, using a combination of the pragma-dialectical and extended pragma-dialectical theories of argumentation. The findings show that the hearing panel initially starts of as the institutional protagonist and defendants as the antagonists, and but later serve as the institutional antagonist and protagonists, respectively. The defendants tend to use analogy and causal argumentation schemes while employing subordinative and complementary coordinative argumentation structures. The defendants also employ different strategic maneuvers at different argumentative stages of the critical discussion. Due to the politico-forensic communicative domain and information-seeking genre of the investigative public hearing discourse, the concluding stage is suspended. Thus, the study shows the influence of communicative activity type on the argumentative activities in a critical discussion.
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
3

Venturi, Eliseu Raphael. "Racionalidade jurídica crítico-libertadora e direitos humanos ante horizontes autoritários contemporâneos". Teoria Jurídica Contemporânea 3, n.º 1 (26 de dezembro de 2018): 98–119. http://dx.doi.org/10.21875/tjc.v3i1.17361.

Texto completo da fonte
Resumo:
RESUMO: O objeto do artigo consiste na investigação dos elementos de uma possível racionalidade jurídica crítico-libertadora, segundo construção teórica do filósofo do direito paranaense Celso Luiz Ludwig. Recorre-se, para tanto, a alguns pressupostos teóricos da teoria, abrindo-se algumas interfaces, em especial, com o pensamento do filósofo argentino Enrique Dussel, que fundamenta em peso aquela teoria, de modo a se contemporizar compreensões em torno as condições de possibilidade da vida humana com o potencial de construção hermenêutica e argumentativa no Direito. Tal conjunto filosófico expõe uma visão de mundo especificamente urgente em tempos de horizontes autoritários na política e no direito contemporâneos, afirmando-se, assim, posturas democráticas e afins ao Direito Internacional dos Direitos Humanos. Trata-se de pesquisa com metodologia bibliográfica e conceitual, enfocando construções teóricas e suas influências em âmbito hermenêutico e argumentativo. ABSTRACT:The article focuses on a possible “critical-emancipatory legal rationality”, according to Celso Ludwig’s theoretical construction. Some theoretical relations are made, in particular, with the Enrique Dussel’s life paradigm, in order to temporize understandings around the human’s life conditions with the potential of hermeneutics and argumentative construction in Law. That philosophical set is especially important in times of authoritarian horizons in contemporary politics and law, affirming democratic positions and related to International Human Rights Law. It is a research with bibliographical and conceptual methodology, focusing theoretical constructions and its influences in hermeneutic and argumentative scope.
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
4

Silva, Cássio Faria da, Amanda Pontes Rassi, Jackson Wilke da Cruz Souza, Renata Ramisch, Roger Alfredo de Marci Rodrigues Antunes e Helena De Medeiros Caseli. "Quality of argumentation in political tweets: what is and how to measure it / Qualidade da argumentação em tweets de política: o que e como avaliar". REVISTA DE ESTUDOS DA LINGUAGEM 29, n.º 4 (28 de julho de 2021): 2537. http://dx.doi.org/10.17851/2237-2083.29.4.2537-2586.

Texto completo da fonte
Resumo:
Abstract: Argumentation is something inherent to human beings and essential to written and spoken communication. Because of the popularization of Internet access, social media are one of the main means of creation and profusion of argumentative texts in various fields, such as politics. As a way to contribute to research related to the assessment of the quality of argumentation in Portuguese, we aim in this paper to propose and validate criteria and guidelines for the assessment of the quality of argumentation in Twitter posts in the domain of politics. For this purpose, a corpus was produced and annotated with tweets whose content is related to the Brazilian political scenario. The texts were collected in the first months of 2021, resulting in 1,649,674 posts. From the analysis of a sample, we defined linguistic criteria that would potentially characterize relevant aspects of the rhetorical dimension of argumentation, namely: (i) Clarity, (ii) Arrangement, (iii) Credibility, and (iv) Emotional appeal. After this phase of analysis, we proposed the annotation of a new set of 400 tweets, by four annotators. As a result, an agreement of around 70% for three out of four annotators was obtained. It is worth noting that this is the first work that proposes linguistic criteria for the evaluation of the quality of argumentation in social medias for Brazilian Portuguese. It is intended to construct a computer model that can automatically evaluate the quality of argumentation in social media messages, such as Twitter, based on the establishment of linguistic criteria, annotation rules, and annotated corpus.Keywords: argumentation; corpus; quality; rhetorical dimension; tweets; politics.Resumo: A argumentação é algo inerente ao ser humano e essencial para a comunicação escrita e falada. Por conta da popularização do acesso à Internet, as redes sociais são um dos principais meios de criação e profusão de textos argumentativos de vários domínios, como a política. Como forma de contribuir com as pesquisas relacionadas à avaliação da qualidade da argumentação em português, este trabalho tem como objetivo propor e validar critérios e diretrizes para a avaliação da qualidade da argumentação em postagens no Twitter no domínio da política. Para tanto, produziu-se um corpus anotado com tweets cujo conteúdo relaciona-se ao cenário político brasileiro. Os textos foram coletados nos primeiros meses de 2021, resultando em 1.649.674 postagens. A partir da análise de uma amostra, foram definidos critérios linguísticos que potencialmente caracterizariam aspectos relevantes da dimensão retórica da argumentação, a saber: (i) Clareza, (ii) Organização, (iii) Credibilidade e (iv) Apelo emocional. Após essa fase de análise, propôs-se a anotação de um novo conjunto de 400 tweets, por quatro anotadores. Como resultado, obteve-se uma concordância de cerca de 70% entre 3 dos 4 anotadores. Vale ressaltar que esse é o primeiro trabalho que propõe critérios linguísticos para a avaliação da qualidade da argumentação em redes sociais para o português brasileiro. A partir da definição dos critérios linguísticos, diretrizes de anotação e corpus anotado, espera-se construir um modelo computacional que possa avaliar automaticamente a qualidade da argumentação em textos de redes sociais, como o Twitter.Palavras-chave: argumentação; corpus; qualidade; dimensão retórica; tweets; política.
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
5

Faltesek, Daniel. "Big Argumentation?" tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society 11, n.º 2 (15 de agosto de 2013): 402–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.31269/triplec.v11i2.464.

Texto completo da fonte
Resumo:
Big Data is nothing new. Public concern regarding the mass diffusion of data has appeared repeatedly with computing innovations, in the formation before Big Data it was most recently referred to as the information explosion. In this essay, I argue that the appeal of Big Data is not a function of computational power, but of a synergistic relationship between aesthetic order and a politics evacuated of a meaningful public deliberation. Understanding, and challenging, Big Data requires an attention to the aesthetics of data visualization and the ways in which those aesthetics would seem to depoliticize information. The conclusion proposes an alternative argumentative aesthetic as the appropriate response to the depoliticization posed by the popular imaginary of Big Data.
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
6

Faltesek, Daniel. "Big Argumentation?" tripleC: Communication, Capitalism & Critique. Open Access Journal for a Global Sustainable Information Society 11, n.º 2 (15 de agosto de 2013): 402–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.31269/vol11iss2pp402-411.

Texto completo da fonte
Resumo:
Big Data is nothing new. Public concern regarding the mass diffusion of data has appeared repeatedly with computing innovations, in the formation before Big Data it was most recently referred to as the information explosion. In this essay, I argue that the appeal of Big Data is not a function of computational power, but of a synergistic relationship between aesthetic order and a politics evacuated of a meaningful public deliberation. Understanding, and challenging, Big Data requires an attention to the aesthetics of data visualization and the ways in which those aesthetics would seem to depoliticize information. The conclusion proposes an alternative argumentative aesthetic as the appropriate response to the depoliticization posed by the popular imaginary of Big Data.
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
7

Borovali, Murat. "Ad hominem argumentation in politics". Philosophy & Social Criticism 44, n.º 4 (12 de fevereiro de 2018): 426–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0191453718755206.

Texto completo da fonte
Resumo:
A healthy and robust public political culture is generally regarded as being of utmost necessity for the maintenance of a stable democratic environment. Especially when a country is facing significant challenges and is in the process of devising and implementing radical reforms, the presence of satisfactory collective deliberation can ensure durability and stability. This article will focus on one type of argumentation that stands in the way of such healthy deliberation. It will explore the various forms that ad hominem arguments take and consider the harmful consequences of their wide prominence in the political culture of the country.
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
8

Henkel, Michael. "Michael Oakeshott – Die Ansprüche der Politik (The Claims of Politics)". Politisches Denken. Jahrbuch 29, n.º 1 (1 de janeiro de 2019): 145–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.3790/jpd.29.1.145.

Texto completo da fonte
Resumo:
With the following essay, Michael Oakeshott took part in a symposium of the Journal Scrutiny whose articles were published in the September issue of 1939. The authors who spoke up pursued the question of whether artists, writers and philosophers had a special political task. As part of his presentation, Oakeshott outlined the specific task that politics has to accomplish for a society. It consists in ensuring security and in maintaining law and order. Oakeshott then shows the contribution that cultural workers and intellectuals make to the successful living together of a community. It is to clear the self-image and understanding of a society. Oakeshott’s argument thus creates the image of a social whole that includes a plurality of social sub-areas, that only contribute to the success of the whole by providing the services and tasks that are characteristic of them – even in times of crisis. The argumentation shows that art and culture have no specific political mandate, no duty to take political action, and that they would miss their social purpose if they put themselves in the service of a political mission and would thus neglect their indispensable cultural role.
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
9

Alindra, A. L., e Ana Ana. "Argumentation and Reasoning Skills In Socioscientific Issues". Innovation of Vocational Technology Education 14, n.º 2 (14 de dezembro de 2018): 44. http://dx.doi.org/10.17509/invotec.v14i2.14356.

Texto completo da fonte
Resumo:
Education is facing big challenges so that it can create qualify individuals in problem solving. Application of knowledge and or scientific concepts in the public is a realization of knowledge obtained by students at school. There are several ways to develop science education, one of which is through argumentation skill towards socioscientific issues. The socioscientific issue is scientific concept and problem-based issue, controversy, public discussion greatly influenced by socio-politics. This writing by literature study method aims to explore on argumentation skill for students so that they can face any problem solving challenges in daily life by studying; application of argumentation skill for socio scientific issue in daily life, argumentation and reasoning as well as Toulmin Argumentation Patter as the pattern used in student argumentation skill access.
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
10

Kurki, Milja. "The politics of the philosophy of science". International Theory 1, n.º 3 (novembro de 2009): 440–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1752971909990157.

Texto completo da fonte
Resumo:
Monteiro and Ruby (2009) argue that International Relations (IR) scholars should look to adopt a more ‘tentative attitude’ towards the philosophy of science (PoS) frameworks in IR. This is an attractive and timely call for more open-minded PoS argumentation in the field. Yet, the logic of Monteiro and Ruby’s argument is not (rather characteristically of PoS debates) infallible. As other commentaries in this forum show, it is not self-evident that Monteiro and Ruby’s account is ‘post-foundational’, or that it is premised on an accurate reading of existing PoS positions in IR. However, I do not here wish to elaborate further on the critiques that could be made of the internal coherence of Monteiro and Ruby’s argumentation or their reading of core philosophical schools. Instead, I want to discuss a different kind of an issue raised by Monteiro and Ruby’s intervention: their treatment of the interaction of political forms of argumentation and PoS debates.
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
Mais fontes

Teses / dissertações sobre o assunto "Politisk argumentation"

1

Nilsson, Rebecka. "Personifieringen av den politiska retoriken : Fredrik Reinfeldts argumentation i personliga intervjuer". Thesis, Uppsala universitet, Litteraturvetenskapliga institutionen, 2014. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-230335.

Texto completo da fonte
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
2

Alegria, Alvarez Li. "Jämställdhet i politisk debatt : en argumentationsanalys av riksdagsdebatt". Thesis, Högskolan i Gävle, Avdelningen för humaniora, 2015. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:hig:diva-20586.

Texto completo da fonte
Resumo:
This study involves an analysis of arguments on parental allowance debates and sex legislation debates. The debates that will be analyzed are the following; allowance, equality bonus, stricter punishment for the purchase of sexual services and men's violence against women, violence and oppression, and violence in same-sex relationships. This empirical research is a qualitative study in its entirety, as for the method is an argumentation analysis. The arguments which the debates contain will be analyzed from a gender perspective. The theoretical question is: What is considered equality as a gender perspective? The empirical question is: How did parliament debates the issue of parental and prostitution laws issue from a gender perspective? The debates about genus and gender equality perspective have been a crucial issue in the Swedish Parliament. That women and men are equal or unequal has been heavily emphasized in the debates. My study aims at an in depth investigation in these debates based on an analysis of arguments. Moreover, I have evaluated what gender combined with democracy and democratic self-determination entails. I have structured my analysis up by various arguments and analyzed these arguments on the basis of the perspectives above. My conclusion is that the first two debates were treated particularly in the genus and the gender equality perspective and there was a possibility to connect the theories in relevant argumentations/discussions. However, complex problems emerged in the last two debates, stricter penalty regarding the purchase of sexual services, violence against women, violence and oppression, and violence in same-sex relationships where gender and equality issues have been avoided to be treated. Generally occurring from the bourgeois side than from the opposition.
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
3

Buch, Camilla, e Sanna Håkansson. "Oberoendets tid : En kvalitativ studie av språk och argumentation på fyra svenska ledarsidor under september 2012". Thesis, Södertörns högskola, Institutionen för samhällsvetenskaper, 2012. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-18462.

Texto completo da fonte
Resumo:
Detta är en kvalitativ studie av ledartexter på fyra av Stockholms största nyhetstidningar: Aftonbladet, Expressen, Dagens Nyheter och Svenska Dagbladet. Med utgångspunkt i Lars Nords avhandling från 2001 där han förutspår den klassiska ledartextens tillbakagång har vi undersökt ledartexters språk, argumentation och hur de hanterar politiska ämnen i dagens press mot bakgrund av dels en förändrad situation inom medier och opinion, dels partipressens försvagade ställning. Vi har valt ut 8 skribenter, en man och en kvinna från varje redaktion. Varje skribent bidrar med 3 texter var. Detta ger en slutsumma på 24 texter. Med stöd i den klassiska retoriken och textanalys av opinionsbildande material har vi utformat en modell för att studera ledartextens specifika karaktär. Genom denna analys har vi funnit att ledarens ställning i dagspressen och det offentliga samtalet inte har försvagats som det förutspåddes för tio år sedan, utan snarare förnyats. Partipolitiken som synts på ledarsidorna under partipressens tid syns inte längre, istället är det tidningens ideologier som speglas på ledarsidan.
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
4

Arvidsson, Mattias. "Hur yttrar sig politisk konflikt i Sverige? : - En argumentationsanalys". Thesis, Karlstads universitet, Institutionen för samhälls- och kulturvetenskap (from 2013), 2018. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:kau:diva-68990.

Texto completo da fonte
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
5

Stalfelt, Niordson Carl. "Politiska budskap i miniformat : -en topikanalys av tre politiska partiers twitter". Thesis, Örebro universitet, Institutionen för humaniora, utbildnings- och samhällsvetenskap, 2017. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:oru:diva-61496.

Texto completo da fonte
Resumo:
Denna studie undersöker de tre mest etablerade partierna i Sverige och deras användning av Twitter ur ett retoriskt perspektiv. Twitter används numer frekvent av politiker och kan ses som en slagkraftig informationskanal för framstående personer i maktposition. Studien avser att söka förståelse för hur politiska partier argumenterar för sin egen politiska agenda med utgångspunkt i kritisk retorik och topikanalys. Det teoretiska ramverket för uppsatsen är baserat på en modern förståelse av begreppet topik och genom att undersöka ett antal inlägg inom en viss tidsram söker uppsatsen kartlägga vilka topiker partierna utgår från i sin argumentation. Resultatet visar hur partierna anlägger olika strategier för sina tweets genom de inferentiella och kognitiva topiker de väljer för att föra fram sitt budskap och söka stöd för sin agenda.
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
6

Lundin, Julia. "Medborgardialoger – demokratisering för politisk jämlikhet? : En fallstudie av medborgardialoger i två svenska kommuner som uttryck av deliberativ demokrati". Thesis, Uppsala universitet, Teologiska institutionen, 2021. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-443560.

Texto completo da fonte
Resumo:
Rätten till politisk delaktighet skapar möjligheter för medborgare att göra anspråk på sina mänskliga rättigheter, och därmed möjliggör för medborgare att påverka sina levnadsförhållanden. Frånvaron av möjligheter till att delta och att kunna påverka beslut är därmed ett betydande rättighetsproblem. Uppsatsen har sin start i den politiska ojämlikheten som har påvisats i Sverige, där den allmänna rösträtten inte verkar räcka till för att garantera politisk jämlikhet. I utredningar föreslås medborgardialog som en lösning. Syftet med denna uppsats är att undersöka om medborgardialoger, initierade av Hallstahammars kommun och Västerås stad, kan förstås som ett uttryck av deliberativ demokrati. För att studera detta avgränsades deliberativ demokrati till fem normativa deliberativa ideal; argumentation, inkludering, jämlikhet, transparens och beslutspåverkan. Dessa ideal ses som rimliga villkor för deliberativ demokrati och har mätts mot kommunernas medborgardialoger med hjälp av en kvalitativ fallstudie med textanalys.   Uppsatsens resultat visar på att medborgardialog kan förstås som ett uttryck för deliberativ demokrati när det gäller en del normativa villkor, men i det stora hela så brister medborgardialogerna i de utvalda deliberativa idealen. Hallstahammars kommun är ett uttryck deliberativ demokrati i större utsträckning än Västerås stad. Kommunernas fortsatta arbete med att utveckla medborgardialoger är därför av största vikt och i synnerhet genom att utveckla riktlinjer och strategier explicit för att främja den politiska jämlikheten för samtliga kommunmedborgare. Uppsatsen har resulterat i en sammanfattande guide för att genomföra medborgardialoger med deliberativa kvalitéer.
The right to political participation creates opportunities for citizens to claim their human rights, thereby enabling citizens to influence their living conditions. The absence of opportunities to participate and to be able to influence decisions is therefore a significant human rights problem. The paper starts with the political inequality that has been demonstrated in Sweden, where voting rights does not seem to be enough to guarantee political equality. In studies, citizen dialogues are proposed as a solution.  The purpose of this paper is to investigate whether citizen dialogues, initiated by Hallstahammar municipality and Västerås municipality, can be understood as an expression of deliberative democracy. To study this, deliberative democracy was limited to five normative deliberative ideals: argumentation, inclusion, equality, transparency and decision-making influence. These ideals are reasonable conditions for deliberative democracy and have been measured against municipal citizen dialogues in a qualitative case study using text analysis as a tool.   The result of the study shows that citizen dialogues can be understood as an expression of deliberative democracy when it comes to some normative conditions, but overall, the citizen dialogues lack in the chosen ideals. Hallstahammar municipality is an expression of deliberative democracy to a greater extent than Västerås municipality. The continued work of municipalities in developing citizen dialogues is therefore of the utmost importance and by developing guidelines and strategies explicitly to promote political equality for all municipal citizens. The study has resulted in a guide to conduct citizen dialogues with deliberative qualities.
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
7

Blomster, Anna-Karin. "Politisk debatt när den är som besvärligast : En fallasianalys av en invandringspolitisk debatt mellan Gudrun Schyman och Jimmie Åkesson". Thesis, Uppsala universitet, Avdelningen för retorik, 2014. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-242321.

Texto completo da fonte
Resumo:
Uppsatsen behandlar en besvärlig politisk debatt mellan Gudrun Schyman och Jimmie Åkesson som hölls strax innan riksdagsvalet 2014 i SVT:s Aktuellt. De respektive debattörerna uppfattades som mycket hetska i sin argumentation och debatten mottogs som bråkig och präglad av angrepp. Uppsatsen syftar till att ta reda på vad som gick fel i debatten, vad det är som gör att den upplevs som just bråkig. Med hjälp av pragmadialektisk fallasianalys utrönas argumentationens svagheter som i sin tur ger ett svar på frågeställningen. Det tungsta resultatet av undersökningen visar att Åkesson bryter mot relevansregeln och ståndpunktregeln, vilket betyder att han avleder uppmärksamheten från ämnet samt förvränger Schymans ståndpunkt i debatten. Detta ger upphov till en stigande irritation från Schymans sida, som då i sin tur bryter mot frihetsregeln och går till personangrepp mot Åkesson. Schymans argumentation är övervägande mer logiskt giltig än Åkessons, men svagheten i hennes argumentation är lättare för gemene lyssnare att upptäcka: att gå till personangrepp är ett mer explicit brott än att försöka avleda uppmärksamheten från ämnet, vilket gör att Schymans mer logiskt giltiga argumentation hamnar i skuggan av denna irritation. Åkesson provocerar således fram dessa personangrepp från Schymans sida genom sina brott mot idealen i argumentationdekalogen vilket föder bråkigheten mellan dem.
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
8

Dahlgren, Peter. "Kampen om definitionerna : Politikers retoriska självförsvar under mediedrev". Thesis, Linnéuniversitetet, Institutionen för samhällsvetenskaper, SV, 2012. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:lnu:diva-19677.

Texto completo da fonte
Resumo:
Introduktion: Under 2011 till året därpå var två politiker, Carl Bildt (moderat utrikesminister) och Håkan Juholt (Socialdemokraternas partiledare), utsatta för mediedrev: Etiopiensvenskar-na och bostadsaffären. Juholt var som en svamp som sög upp all kritik medan Bildt framstod som teflon i jämförelse. Hur kommer det sig att Bildt klarade sig och fick sitta kvar som mi-nister, medan Juholt avgick? Problem: Vad är det som skiljer Bildt från Juholts retorik under mediedreven 2011 enligt sta-tusläran? Hur ramar journalisterna in debatten för Bildt respektive Juholt? Teori: Med statusläran (stasis theory) kan en sakfråga analyseras retoriskt genom ett av fyra status (”ställning”): fakta, definition, kvalitet eller procedur. Exempelvis, ett dödande kan handla om huruvida det ägt rum (fakta), om det var mord eller självförsvar (definition), om det var rätt (kvalitet) samt om frågan ska avgöras i annat forum (procedur). Fakta och proce-dur är starkast försvar, definition och kvalitet svagast. Metod: Kvalitativ retorisk analys av Bildt och Juholts medieframträdanden i tv och radio, där medierna anklagar och aktörerna försvarar sig i en dialogsituation. Resultat: Bildt använder mer eller mindre uteslutande ett bevisande (fakta) och överförande status (procedur). När ny information är motstridig, hävdar han att den ska beskrivas an-norlunda (definition). Juholt använder huvudsakligen ett kvalitativt status, ofta för att bedyra sin goda karaktär, även när han kunde valt ett mer lämpligt status. Flera fall har också upp-täckts där journalisterna ställt frågor som varit inramade (presupponerad) på ett tveksamt sätt, ofta på ett kvalitativt status. Diskussion: Bildt använder starkare status vilket får till följd att skandalen inte tenderar att utvecklas i lika hög utsträckning då frågor om moral och värderingar utesluts. Juholt har valt det svagaste statuset. Slutsatsen är att man inte ska välja en försvarsstrategi och hålla fast vid den, utan anpassa försvaret varefter som ny information blir tillgänglig och anklagelsernas karaktär förändras. Slutsatsen gäller reaktiv kriskommunikation, inte nödvändigtvis proaktiv. Dessutom föreslås tre nya analyskriterier till statusläran. Studien begränsas huvudsakligen av medievalet (radio och tv) eftersom bara en del av den medierade politiken fångas, liksom ty-pen av kris (etiska normbrott).
Introduction: During 2011, two major Swedish politicians, Carl Bildt (right-wing foreign min-ister) and Håkan Juholt (leader of the Social Democrats), were set under siege during a so called ‘media hunt’: The Ethiopiaswedes and the residence affair. Juholt was like a sponge absorbing every bit of critique, whereas Bildt seemed like Teflon in comparison. How did Bildt manage to remain in power, while Juholt had to resign? Problem: What sets Bildt’s rhetoric apart from Juholt’s rhetoric during the media hunt under 2011 in relation to the stasis theory? How do the journalists frame the media discourse for Bildt and Juholt? Theory: A controversy can be analyzed rhetorically with one of four stases of the stasis theo-ry: fact, definition, quality or procedure. E.g., a killing has either occurred or not (fact), it may be defined as murder or self-defense (definition), there’s a question if it was the right thing to do (quality) and if the controversy should be judged in another forum (procedure). Fact and procedure is the strongest defense, definition and quality is the weakest. Method: Qualitative rhetorical analysis of Bildt’s and Juholt’s media appearances in TV and radio, where the media accuse and the politicians defend themselves in a dialogue situation. Results: Bildt uses more or less exclusively the stases of fact and procedure. When new in-formation is contradictory to fact, he claims that it should be described differently (stasis of definition). Juholt mostly uses a stasis of quality to assert his good moral character, even when he could’ve chosen a more appropriate stasis. A few cases where the journalists’ questions have been framed (presuppositioned) in a questionable manner have also been found, often in a qualitative stasis. Discussion: Bildt uses stronger stasis which prevents the scandal from evolving and therefore excludes questions about morals and values. Juholt uses a weaker stasis. The conclusion is that one shouldn’t select a rhetorical self-defense strategy and stick to it; rather, the defense should adapt to new information as well as changes in the type of accusation. This conclusion holds for reactive crisis communication, not necessarily proactive. Three new analytical criteria for the stasis theory are also offered. The study is primarily limited by the type of crisis (norm transgressions) and the choice of media (radio and TV) because only a part of the mediatized politics is captured.
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
9

Rosqvist, Jenny. "Pudelns kärna : Vad det innebär att "göra en pudel" ur ett kommunikativt perspektiv". Thesis, Södertörn University College, School of Discourse Studies, 2008. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:sh:diva-1865.

Texto completo da fonte
Resumo:

In this essay I want to investigate how the poodle strategy affects a person’s credibility when he or she uses it. The poodle strategy is a strategy, which someone uses when he or she is scrutinized by the media. It’s primary purpose is to suppress further media coverage but it is also a strategy for defending oneself and hence rescuing one’s reputation either as a private person or as an official.

The essay’s research questions are:

  • How has the strategy been applied for defensive purposes and what are the results?
  • To which extent can the Stasis theory and Benoit’s theory on Apologia be connected to the strategy?
  • Does the strategy affect the user’s credibility?

To answer these questions four cases from the political sphere in Sweden where persons have been said to have “done a poodle” have been analyzed. In order to analyze the strategy and to judge how successful it has been these cases have been connected to the Stasis theory, Benoit’s theory on apologia and theories about credibility and trust.

Additionally this essay investigates how applicable the Stasis theory is as a model for analyses and how relevant analyses based on stasis theory are today. Furthermore it investigates wheteher a fusion of the Stasis theory and Benoit´s theory on Apologia can be profitable.

An important conclusion is that the poodle strategy is a strategy, which is more complicated than one might first think. Whether the strategy works depends on a series of factors; for example the person’s initial credibility (or ethos) and the morality of the actions. These factors need to be assessed before the strategy is put into use.

Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
10

Littmarck, Sofia. "Barn, föräldrar, välfärdsstat : Den politiska debatten om föräldrautbildning och föräldrastöd 1964-2009". Doctoral thesis, Linköpings universitet, Tema Barn, 2017. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:liu:diva-140911.

Texto completo da fonte
Resumo:
The political debate concerning parent education and parenting support between 1964 and 2009 has been scrutinized in this study in the light of the development of and changes in the welfare state. The investigation is based upon the analysis of official government inquiries and parliamentary papers dealing with parent education and parenting support. This study analyzes the different choices in the organization of welfare relevant to children and the family for which political actors have argued, and it examines the views on the relations between children, parents, family and the welfare state that were expressed in the argumentation. Parent education and parenting support aim at changing the living conditions of children by means of the parents. The study shows that the interest in this type of investment has been shared by both the political left and center-right, but from different arguments and political visions on how welfare for children and families with children should be organized, as well as from different views of the role of parent education and parenting support in the welfare.
I den här avhandlingen granskas den politiska debatten om föräldrautbildning och föräldrastöd mellan 1964 och 2009 i ljuset av välfärdssamhällets utveckling och förändring. Studien bygger på en analys av betänkanden från statliga utredningar och riksdagstryck i frågan om föräldrautbildning och föräldrastöd. I studien granskas vilka vägval i organiseringen av välfärden kring barn och familj som politiska aktörer har argumenterat för och vilken syn på relationerna mellan barn, föräldrar, familj och välfärdsstat som kommit till uttryck i argumentationen. Föräldrautbildning och föräldrastöd syftar till att förändra barns villkor genom att påverka föräldrarna. Analysen visar att intresset för denna typ av åtgärd har delats av såväl vänster som borgerliga, men utifrån skilda argument och politiska visioner för hur välfärden kring barn och barnfamiljen ska organiseras, såväl som utifrån olika sätt att se på föräldrautbildningens och föräldrastödets roll i välfärden.
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
Mais fontes

Livros sobre o assunto "Politisk argumentation"

1

Humlum, Jøren. Politisk argumentation: Med særligt henblik på værdirelativismens teoretiske forudsætninger og implikationer. Århus: Institut for statskundskab, Aarhus universitet, 1989.

Encontre o texto completo da fonte
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
2

Busshoff, Heinrich. Politische Argumentation: Überlegungen zu einer Argumentationstheorie der Politik. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 1997.

Encontre o texto completo da fonte
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
3

Busshoff, Heinrich. Gemeinwohl als Wert und Norm: Zur Argumentations- und Kommunikationskultur der Politik. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2001.

Encontre o texto completo da fonte
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
4

Divine talk: Religious argumentation in Demosthenes. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2009.

Encontre o texto completo da fonte
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
5

Irredentism in European politics: Argumentation, compromise, and norms. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2008.

Encontre o texto completo da fonte
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
6

Touloumakos, J. Die theoretische Begründung der Demokratie in der klassischen Zeit Griechnlands: Die demokratishe Argumentation in der "Politik" des Aristoteles. Athens: E. Papazisis, 1985.

Encontre o texto completo da fonte
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
7

Argumentation in der "politischen Predigt": Untersuchungen zur Kommunikationskultur in theologischem Interesse. Frankfurt am Main: P. Lang, 1990.

Encontre o texto completo da fonte
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
8

Lüddecke, Dirk. Das politische Denken Dantes: Überlegungen zur Argumentation der Monarchia Dante Alighieris. Neuried: Ars una, 1999.

Encontre o texto completo da fonte
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
9

Klug, Matthias. Rückwendung zum Mittelalter?: Geschichtsbilder und historische Argumentation im politischen Katholizismus des Vormärz. Paderborn: Schöningh, 1995.

Encontre o texto completo da fonte
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
10

Klug, Matthias. Rückwendung zum Mittelalter?: Geschichtsbilder und historische Argumentation im politischen Katholizismus des Vormärz. Paderborn: Ferdinand Schöningh, 1995.

Encontre o texto completo da fonte
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
Mais fontes

Capítulos de livros sobre o assunto "Politisk argumentation"

1

Netelenbos, Benno. "Politics as Argumentation". In Political Legitimacy beyond Weber, 175–237. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-55112-2_5.

Texto completo da fonte
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
2

Rutten, Kris, Hilde Van Belle e Paul Gillaerts. "Let’s talk politics: Introduction". In Argumentation in Context, 3–9. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/aic.6.00int.

Texto completo da fonte
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
3

Zarefsky, David. "The Impasse of the Liberal Argument: Speculation on American Politics in the Late 1960s". In Argumentation Library, 239–52. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-05485-8_19.

Texto completo da fonte
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
4

Kock, Christian. "Aristotle on deliberation: Its place in ethics, politics and rhetoric". In Argumentation in Context, 13–25. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Publishing Company, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/aic.6.01koc.

Texto completo da fonte
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
5

Amossy, Ruth. "Understanding political issues through argumentation analysis". In The Routledge Handbook of Language and Politics, 262–75. Milton Park, Abingdon, Oxon; New York, NY: Routledge, [2017] |: Routledge, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315183718-20.

Texto completo da fonte
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
6

Rudolph, Hartmut. "Religion and Politics: The Controversy over the Political Mandate of the Protestant Church in Germany (EKD) Relating to the Eastern Policy 1950–1972". In Logic, Argumentation & Reasoning, 113–20. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7131-4_11.

Texto completo da fonte
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
7

Pinto, Laura Elizabeth. "Politics and Argumentation in Financial Literacy Education Policy". In International Handbook of Financial Literacy, 131–46. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-10-0360-8_10.

Texto completo da fonte
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
8

Pinho, Fabiana. "On Logos, Pathos and Ethos in Judicial Argumentation". In Aristotle on Emotions in Law and Politics, 133–53. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-66703-4_7.

Texto completo da fonte
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
9

Durnova, Anna, Frank Fischer e Philippe Zittoun. "Discursive Approaches to Public Policy: Politics, Argumentation, and Deliberation". In Contemporary Approaches to Public Policy, 35–56. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/978-1-137-50494-4_3.

Texto completo da fonte
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
10

Dunne, Tim, e Katharine Gelber. "Argumentation and the Responsibility to Protect: The Case of Libya". In Human Rights Protection in Global Politics, 288–308. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137463173_14.

Texto completo da fonte
Estilos ABNT, Harvard, Vancouver, APA, etc.
Você também pode estar interessado nas extensas listas de trabalhos sobre o assunto "Politisk argumentation":
Artigos de revistas Teses / dissertações Livros
Oferecemos descontos em todos os planos premium para autores cujas obras estão incluídas em seleções literárias temáticas. Contate-nos para obter um código promocional único!

Vá para a bibliografia