Auswahl der wissenschaftlichen Literatur zum Thema „- Criticism and interpretation“
Geben Sie eine Quelle nach APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard und anderen Zitierweisen an
Machen Sie sich mit den Listen der aktuellen Artikel, Bücher, Dissertationen, Berichten und anderer wissenschaftlichen Quellen zum Thema "- Criticism and interpretation" bekannt.
Neben jedem Werk im Literaturverzeichnis ist die Option "Zur Bibliographie hinzufügen" verfügbar. Nutzen Sie sie, wird Ihre bibliographische Angabe des gewählten Werkes nach der nötigen Zitierweise (APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver usw.) automatisch gestaltet.
Sie können auch den vollen Text der wissenschaftlichen Publikation im PDF-Format herunterladen und eine Online-Annotation der Arbeit lesen, wenn die relevanten Parameter in den Metadaten verfügbar sind.
Zeitschriftenartikel zum Thema "- Criticism and interpretation":
Syahputra, Fikry Prastya. „Meme Ideational Meaning: Multimodal Interpretation“. Talenta Conference Series: Local Wisdom, Social, and Arts (LWSA) 1, Nr. 1 (17.10.2018): 022–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.32734/lwsa.v1i1.136.
Rabbany T, Al-Faiz M., und Indal Abror. „TAFSIR PROGRESIF ATAS KISAH-KISAH DALAM AL-QUR’AN KARYA EKO PRASETYO“. Jurnal Studi Ilmu-ilmu Al-Qur'an dan Hadis 19, Nr. 1 (12.10.2019): 85. http://dx.doi.org/10.14421/qh.2018.1901-05.
Zaret, David, und Michael Walzer. „Interpretation and Social Criticism“. Contemporary Sociology 17, Nr. 1 (Januar 1988): 122. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2069485.
Senchuk, Dennis M., und Michael Walzer. „Interpretation and Social Criticism.“ Noûs 26, Nr. 3 (September 1992): 389. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2215966.
Gorski, Philip S. „SCIENTISM, INTERPRETATION, AND CRITICISM“. Zygon� 25, Nr. 3 (September 1990): 279–307. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9744.1990.tb00793.x.
Rosen, Bernard. „Interpretation and Social Criticism“. Journal of Higher Education 59, Nr. 6 (November 1988): 704–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00221546.1988.11780237.
Rosen, Bernard, und Michael Walzer. „Interpretation and Social Criticism“. Journal of Higher Education 59, Nr. 6 (November 1988): 704. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/1982241.
CAN GÜRBÜZ, Gülsevim. „Araştırıcı Sanat Eleştirisi ve Bir Sanat Eleştirisi Örneği“. Journal of Social Research and Behavioral Sciences 7, Nr. 14 (10.12.2021): 150–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.52096/jsrbs.7.14.7.
Morrow, Jeffrey L. „The Politics of Biblical Interpretation: A ‘Criticism of Criticism’“. New Blackfriars 91, Nr. 1035 (12.08.2010): 528–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1741-2005.2009.01342.x.
Green, Joel B. „Rethinking "History" for Theological Interpretation“. Journal of Theological Interpretation 5, Nr. 2 (2011): 159–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/26421422.
Dissertationen zum Thema "- Criticism and interpretation":
Hoyer, Steven. „Intention and interpretation“. Thesis, McGill University, 1993. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=68104.
Chapter two is about interpretation. I open the chapter with an examination of extreme conventionalist theses, arguing that their success depends on an unjustifiably strict demarcation between intentionality and textuality. Appropriating aspects of Donald Davidson's work in the philosophy of language, I argue for the recognition of linguistic communication as a form of intentional action. I then defend this thesis against more moderate conventionalist theories to offer a viable approach to the interpretation of literary works.
Anger, Suzy. „Victorian hermeneutics and literary interpretation /“. Thesis, Connect to this title online; UW restricted, 1994. http://hdl.handle.net/1773/9374.
King, Noel. „Anxieties of commentary : interpretation in recent literary, film and cultural criticism /“. Title page, table of contents and abstact only, 1994. http://web4.library.adelaide.edu.au/theses/09PH/09phk532.pdf.
HSIAO, CHING-SONG GENE. „SEMIOTIC INTERPRETATION OF CHINESE POETRY: TU MU'S POETRY AS EXAMPLE (CRITICISM)“. Diss., The University of Arizona, 1985. http://hdl.handle.net/10150/188120.
Bennett, Richard. „Variations : influence intertextuality, and Milan Kundera, Jean Rhys, and Tom Stoppard“. Thesis, McGill University, 1994. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=26254.
Chapter two deals with theories of intertextuality, principally those of Julia Kristeva and Michael Riffaterre. As alternatives to theories of influence, neither proves satisfactory. Both founder on the contradictory goal to explain all literature, at the expense of recognizing literary diversity.
Chapter three concerns literary variations. These are texts which are deliberately premised on pre-existing texts. I focus on three examples from this class of literary texts which is not satisfactorily dealt with by any of the theories I consider. I pursue a less wide-ranging approach in order to unearth important features of literary variations.
Meir, Amira. „Medieval Jewish interpretation of pentateuchal poetry“. Thesis, McGill University, 1994. http://digitool.Library.McGill.CA:80/R/?func=dbin-jump-full&object_id=28842.
The effort begins by defining Pentateuchal poetry and discussing a range of its presentations by various ancient writers. Subsequent chapters examine its treatment by Rabbi Saadia Gaon of Baghdad (882-942), Abraham Ibn Ezra of Spain (1089-1164), Samuel Ben Meir (1080-1160) and Joseph Bekhor Shor (12th century) of Northern France, David Kimhi of Provence (1160-1235), and Obadiah Sforno of Italy (1470-1550).
While all of these commentators wrote on the poetic passages, none differentiated systematically between Pentateuchal prose and poetry or treated them in substantially different ways. Samuel Ben Meir, Ibn Ezra, Bekhor Shor, and Kimhi did discuss some poetic features of these texts. The other two men were far less inclined to do so, but occasionally recognized some differences between prose and poetry and some phenomena unique to the latter.
Walton, Jennifer Lee. „POLITICAL REELISM: A RHETORICAL CRITICISM OF REFLECTION AND INTERPRETATION IN POLITICAL FILMS“. Connect to this title online, 2006. http://rave.ohiolink.edu/etdc/view?acc%5Fnum=bgsu1143492027.
Turner, Seth. „Revelation 11:1-13 : history of interpretation“. Thesis, University of Oxford, 2005. http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:57efe3b3-7c61-412f-9001-5269860a896d.
Nicol, George Grey. „Studies in the interpretation of Genesis 26.1-33“. Thesis, University of Oxford, 1987. http://ora.ox.ac.uk/objects/uuid:8fff7ce7-9a50-4011-9f54-5776c84aa36a.
Kilian, Monica. „The exile's experience : an examination of the poetry of Hilde Domin and Waclaw Iwaniuk“. Thesis, University of British Columbia, 1987. http://hdl.handle.net/2429/26855.
Arts, Faculty of
English, Department of
Graduate
Bücher zum Thema "- Criticism and interpretation":
Walzer, Michael. Interpretation and social criticism. Cambridge, Mass: Harvard University Press, 1987.
Fidora, Alexander, und Nicola Polloni, Hrsg. Appropriation, Interpretation and Criticism. Turnhout: Brepols Publishers, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1484/m.tema-eb.5.114029.
J, McGann Jerome, Hrsg. Textual criticism and literary interpretation. Chicago: University of Chicago Press, 1985.
1952-, Black David Alan, und Dockery David S, Hrsg. New Testament criticism and interpretation. Grand Rapids, Mich: Zondervan, 1991.
Scodari, Christine. Media criticism: Journeys in interpretation. Dubuque, Iowa: Kendall/Hunt Pub. Co., 1992.
Sugirtharajah, R. S. Postcolonial criticism and biblical interpretation. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2002.
Blount, Brian K. Cultural interpretation: Reorienting New Testament criticism. Minneapolis: Fortress Press, 1995.
Claire, Gaard Greta, und Murphy Patrick D. 1951-, Hrsg. Ecofeminist literary criticism: Theory, interpretation, pedagogy. Urbana: University of Illinois Press, 1998.
1956-, Porter Stanley E., Hrsg. Dictionary of biblical criticism and interpretation. London: Routledge, 2006.
N, Devy G., Hrsg. Indian literary criticism: Theory and interpretation. Hyderabad: Orient Longman, 2002.
Buchteile zum Thema "- Criticism and interpretation":
Bogel, Fredric V. „New Formalist Interpretation“. In New Formalist Criticism, 102–52. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137362599_4.
Cohen, Ralph. „Literary Criticism and Artistic Interpretation“. In Reason and Imagination, 279–306. London: Routledge, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781003222996-14.
Bonelli, Paolo, Giorgio Guidotti, Enrico Paolini und Giulio Spinucci. „Pacemaker Stimulation Criticism at ECG“. In New Concepts in ECG Interpretation, 175–85. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-91677-4_16.
Wang, Fengzhen. „Marxist Literary Criticism in China“. In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, 715–22. London: Macmillan Education UK, 1988. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19059-1_49.
Capellmann, Herbert. „Later Criticism of the Copenhagen Interpretation“. In SpringerBriefs in History of Science and Technology, 77–81. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-61884-5_10.
Amesbury, Richard. „Norms, Interpretation, and Decision-Making: Derrida on Justice“. In Morality and Social Criticism, 46–64. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9780230507951_3.
Mallinson, Jane. „Objects of Attention: The Literary Criticism“. In T.S. Eliot’s Interpretation of F.H. Bradley, 23–34. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-017-0411-3_3.
Gutiérrez Pozo, Antonio. „Subjectivity and Transcendence: Husserl’s Criticism of Naturalistic Thought“. In Man’s Self-Interpretation-in-Existence, 379–85. Dordrecht: Springer Netherlands, 1990. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-94-009-1864-1_30.
Barrett, Michèle. „The Place of Aesthetics in Marxist Criticism“. In Marxism and the Interpretation of Culture, 697–713. London: Macmillan Education UK, 1988. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-19059-1_48.
Polka, Brayton. „Interpretation and the Bible: The Dialectic of Concept and Content in Interpretative Practice“. In Hermeneutics, the Bible and Literary Criticism, 27–45. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 1992. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-349-21986-5_2.
Konferenzberichte zum Thema "- Criticism and interpretation":
Al-dabbagh, Asma. „The Nature of Interpretation in Architectural criticism“. In INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ARCHITECTURAL AND CIVIL ENGINEERING 2020. Cihan University-Erbil, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.24086/aces2020/paper.256.
„Interpretation of "Wuthering Heights" from the Perspective of Eco-criticism“. In 2018 4th International Conference on Economics, Management and Humanities Science. Francis Academic Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.25236/ecomhs.2018.126.
Kenyhercz, Róbert. „Interpretation of data and sources in etymological research“. In International Conference on Onomastics “Name and Naming”. Editura Mega, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.30816/iconn5/2019/39.
Verner, Inna. „The legacy of Maximus the Greek in the biblical revision of Euthymius Chudovsky (1680s)“. In Tenth Rome Cyril-Methodian Readings. Indrik, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.31168/91674-576-4.04.
Fateeva, I. „“AN EVERLASTING DAY” (IN RELATION TO THE PAINTING “HUNTERS IN THE SNOW” BY PIETER BRUEGEL)“. In Aesthetics and Hermeneutics. LCC MAKS Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.29003/m2554.978-5-317-06726-7/93-96.
Aravot, Iris. „An Attempt at Making Urban Design Principles Explicit“. In 1995 ACSA International Conference. ACSA Press, 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.35483/acsa.intl.1995.42.
Aslandogan, Y. Alp. „PRESENT AND POTENTIAL IMPACT OF THE SPIRITUAL TRADITION OF ISLAM ON CONTEMPORARY MUSLIMS: FROM GHAZALI TO GÜLEN“. In Muslim World in Transition: Contributions of the Gülen Movement. Leeds Metropolitan University Press, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.55207/mnsp5562.
Xu, Manyan. „A New Interpretation of Chinese Versions of Stray Birds Based on Reiss's Translation Criticism A Case Study of the Translations by Feng Tang and Zheng Zhenduo“. In Proceedings of the 2nd International Conference on Contemporary Education, Social Sciences and Ecological Studies (CESSES 2019). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/cesses-19.2019.128.
Livesey, Graham, und Antony Moulis. „From Impact to Legacy: Interpreting Critical Writing on Le Corbusier from the 1920s to the Present“. In LC2015 - Le Corbusier, 50 years later. Valencia: Universitat Politècnica València, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.4995/lc2015.2015.712.
Apenko, Elena. „qAnotherq Literature of American Revolution: poetry of M. O. Warren and Ph. Wheatley and its Interpretation by American Feminist Critics“. In 45th International Philological Conference (IPC 2016). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/ipc-16.2017.40.
Berichte der Organisationen zum Thema "- Criticism and interpretation":
Kelly, Luke. Emerging Trends Within the Women, Peace and Security (WPS) Agenda. Institute of Development Studies (IDS), Januar 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.19088/k4d.2022.019.