Добірка наукової літератури з теми "Formal catalogues of fundamental rights"
Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями
Ознайомтеся зі списками актуальних статей, книг, дисертацій, тез та інших наукових джерел на тему "Formal catalogues of fundamental rights".
Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.
Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.
Статті в журналах з теми "Formal catalogues of fundamental rights"
Jankuv, Juraj. "Protection of Right to Environment in International Public Law." International and Comparative Law Review 19, no. 1 (June 1, 2019): 146–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.2478/iclr-2019-0005.
Повний текст джерелаHoffman, Daniel N. "What Makes a Right Fundamental." Review of Politics 49, no. 4 (1987): 515–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0034670500035440.
Повний текст джерелаMeagher, Dan. "The judicial evolution (or counter-revolution) of fundamental rights protection in Australia." Alternative Law Journal 42, no. 1 (March 2017): 9–13. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1037969x17694785.
Повний текст джерелаForan, Michael P. "THE RULE OF GOOD LAW: FORM, SUBSTANCE AND FUNDAMENTAL RIGHTS." Cambridge Law Journal 78, no. 3 (August 8, 2019): 570–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0008197319000618.
Повний текст джерелаCharles, Jacob. "Securing Gun Rights by Statute: The Right to Keep and Bear Arms Outside the Constitution." Michigan Law Review, no. 120.4 (2022): 581. http://dx.doi.org/10.36644/mlr.120.4.securing.
Повний текст джерелаBurdeynyy, Yu. "Principles of interpretation of fundamental human rights through the prism of international case law." Uzhhorod National University Herald. Series: Law 1, no. 72 (November 16, 2022): 86–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2022.72.14.
Повний текст джерелаZhou, Wubiao. "Property Rights, Deregulation, and Entrepreneurial Development in a Transition Economy." Management and Organization Review 14, no. 1 (November 8, 2017): 73–103. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/mor.2016.59.
Повний текст джерелаChung, Hun. "Rawls’s Self-Defeat: A Formal Analysis." Erkenntnis 85, no. 5 (December 7, 2018): 1169–97. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10670-018-0079-4.
Повний текст джерелаLundy, Laura, and Gabriela Martínez Sainz. "The role of law and legal knowledge for a transformative human rights education: addressing violations of children’s rights in formal education." Human Rights Education Review 1, no. 2 (September 17, 2018): 04–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.7577/hrer.2560.
Повний текст джерелаKuzenko, Uliana. "Universal declaration of human rights as a source of universal international legal standards of human rights." Scientific and informational bulletin of Ivano-Frankivsk University of Law named after King Danylo Halytskyi, no. 9(21) (October 2, 2020): 36–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.33098/2078-6670.2020.9.21.36-42.
Повний текст джерелаДисертації з теми "Formal catalogues of fundamental rights"
Vidot, Agnès. "La codification constitutionnelle des droits fondamentaux : Recherche sur l'absence de catalogue formel de droits fondamentaux dans la Constitution française du 4 octobre 1958." Electronic Thesis or Diss., La Réunion, 2023. http://www.theses.fr/2023LARE0031.
Повний текст джерелаThe comparison of the Constitution of October 4, 1958 with the foreign constitutions allows to highlight a specific feature of the French constitutional order. Our fundamental law has never been endowed, after a codification exercise, with any formal catalogue of fundamental rights comparable to those which were introduced from the beginning of the 20th century in other States. While it is not completely ignored, the French exception has been barely discussed. The fact that the meeting between fundamental rights and codification has never taken place in France, willingly referred to as the “country of human rights” and the “chosen land of codification”, cannot however fail to attract attention. In particular, the question arises whether the singularity of our constitutional text, which is both salient and intriguing, is also irreducible. In other words, is the story of this meeting that never took place the story of missed appointments or of an impossible relationship ? The research aims to question both the possibility of codifying fundamental rights in the French Constitution of October 4, 1958, and the usefulness of such an operation
Sakamoto, Fábio Meneguelo. "Direitos materialmente fundamentais." Pontifícia Universidade Católica de São Paulo, 2017. https://tede2.pucsp.br/handle/handle/20735.
Повний текст джерелаMade available in DSpace on 2017-12-20T08:48:16Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1 Fábio Meneguelo Sakamoto.pdf: 1270213 bytes, checksum: cd50de1346cf85f25ee0ac36df9df979 (MD5) Previous issue date: 2017-12-11
Despite the vast amount of literature available on fundamental rights, both in the Brazilian Law, and in the Comparative Law, there is still a need for more studies as the society evolves and personal relationships become richer and more complex, demanding that the interpreter and judges play a role beyond the traditional logical-subsumptive method in applying the norm to a concrete case (major premise, minor premise and conclusion). Thus, it is possible that, at a certain point, there is a need to acknowledge a right that has not been pre-established as a norm, neither in the constitutional text, nor in any other normative document; we believe this has been the reason why contemporary constitutions have expressly predicted a clause of unenumerated rights, such as art. 5, §2nd, of the Brazilian Constitution, and art. 16th, n. 1, of the Portuguese Constitution, acknowledging that other fundamental rights are recognized by constituted powers, especially by the Judiciary in the exercise of their activity. Such possibility requires a definition of what can be considered fundamental from the point of view of its contents, i. e., from its essence; this is precisely the object of our study: to investigate the values which can effectively be a benchmark for the acknowledgment of rights as fundamental. We concluded that such values derive from the combination of the precepts established in art. 1st, caput, its clauses and single paragraph, in art. 2nd and in art. 60, §4th, I to IV, of the Federal Constitution; such values are mutually related and constitute a safe indication that they have been elected by the Constituent as the most legitimate ones to forge the special category of rights known as the fundamental rights. Based on this conclusion, we verified that not every mechanism contained in the Federal Constitution - including in the catalogue of art. 5th - has the necessary to be considered fundamental. On the other hand, others that do not even appear in the text are included in this special category of rights. Therefore, it is possible to mention the existence of rights which are merely constitutional and rights which are materially fundamental, or fundamental per se, which, for a didactic effect herein, we chose to call truly fundamental. The practical consequence of this differentiation is the fact that merely constitutional rights, though named fundamental, could be deleted or substantially modified through a constitutional amendment, without the problem predicted by the eternity clauses. The opposite is also true, i. e., a right outside the catalogue, but with a status of fundamental right, cannot be suppressed, nor modified in its essence. In this study, we analyzed a vast bibliography, both Brazilian and foreign; besides, we selected some paradigmatic practical cases judged by the Brazilian Federal Supreme Court and some judged by foreign courts, such as the German Federal Constitutional Court
O tema dos direitos fundamentais, apesar da vasta produção bibliográfica já existente a respeito, tanto no direito brasileiro quanto no direito comparado, continua sempre atual, na medida em que a evolução da sociedade faz com que as relações pessoais sejam cada vez mais ricas e complexas, exigindo, do intérprete e do aplicador do Direito, naturalmente, um papel que, muitas vezes, vai além do método tradicional lógico-subsuntivo de aplicação da norma ao caso concreto (premissa maior, premissa menor e conclusão). Dessa maneira, é possível que, em algum momento, surja a necessidade de reconhecimento de um direito que não esteja pré-estabelecido, como norma, no texto constitucional nem em qualquer outro documento normativo, e acreditamos tenha sido exatamente por essa razão que as constituições contemporâneas tenham previsto expressamente uma cláusula de abertura material, como é o caso do art. 5, §2º, da brasileira e do art. 16º, n. 1, da portuguesa, admitindo que outros direitos fundamentais sejam reconhecidos pelos poderes constituídos, sobretudo pelo Poder Judiciário no exercício da sua atividade-fim. Essa possibilidade impõe a necessidade de definição do que pode ser considerado fundamental do ponto de vista do seu conteúdo, isto é, da sua essência, e foi precisamente esse o objetivo desta dissertação: investigar quais são os valores que efetivamente servem de parâmetro para o reconhecimento de direitos como sendo fundamentais. Pôde-se chegar à conclusão de que tais valores decorrem da conjugação dos preceitos estatuídos no art. 1º, caput, seus incisos e seu parágrafo único, no art. 2º e no art. 60, §4º, I a IV, da Constituição Federal, cujos valores se relacionam mutuamente e constituem um indicativo seguro de que tenham sido eleitos pelo Constituinte como os mais idôneos a forjar essa especial categoria de direitos: os direitos fundamentais. A partir dessa conclusão, foi possível constatar que nem todos os dispositivos contidos na Constituição Federal, inclusive no catálogo do art. 5º, se revestem de conteúdo apto a dotá-los da rubrica semântica fundamental. Em contrapartida, outros que sequer estão escritos no texto fazem parte dessa especial categoria de direitos. Em vista disso, torna-se possível falar na existência de direitos que são meramente constitucionais e direitos que são materialmente fundamentais, ou fundamentais propriamente ditos, os quais, apenas para efeito didático, optamos por denominar de verdadeiramente fundamentais. A consequência prática que decorre dessa diferenciação reside no fato de que os direitos meramente constitucionais, a despeito do rótulo de fundamentais, podem ser eliminados ou substancialmente modificados por meio de emenda constitucional sem esbarrar no óbice previsto pelas regras de eternidade. E o contrário também é verdadeiro, ou seja, um direito fora do catálogo, mas que tenha dignidade de direito fundamental, não pode ser suprimido tampouco modificado em sua essência. Uma vasta bibliografia, nacional e estrangeria, foi objeto de análise e comparação para elaboração desta dissertação assim como foram pinçados alguns casos práticos paradigmáticos julgados pelo Supremo Tribunal Federal e também outros que foram julgados por Tribunais estrangeiros, como é o caso do Tribunal Constitucional Federal alemão
Gdawitz, Susann. "Optimation or Conflict?: the interplay of multiple fundamental rights catalogues in the European Union : A closer examination of the relationship of the European Court of Justice and the Bundesverfassungsgericht." Thesis, Uppsala universitet, Juridiska institutionen, 2013. http://urn.kb.se/resolve?urn=urn:nbn:se:uu:diva-201163.
Повний текст джерелаDe, Waal Elda. "The educator-learner relationship within the South African public school system :|ban educational-juridical perspective / Elda de Waal." Thesis, Potchefstroom University for Christian Higher Education, 2000. http://hdl.handle.net/10394/8616.
Повний текст джерелаThesis (Ph.D.)--Potchefstroom University for Christian Higher Education, 2000
Silva, Selênia Gregory Luzzi da. "AÇÕES AFIRMATIVAS: UM INSTRUMENTO PARA A PROMOÇÃO DA IGUALDADE EFETIVA." Pontifícia Universidade Católica de Goiás, 2010. http://localhost:8080/tede/handle/tede/2768.
Повний текст джерелаThis study is primarily justified by the analysis of the principle of equality, the policy reasons for inequality to ensure effective equality material, which takes effect on the acceptance of difference, due to political pluralism, as expressed in the Constitution Federal. Inequalities originated due to natural factors or historical, cultural, social, economic or political. Whatever the reasons for distinguishing, policies are needed that balance to the minimum access rights and opportunities, from legal and political instruments of Equalization, which occurs through affirmative action. Only the designing principle of equality in its formal and material senses, demonstrating that there is only treatment isonomically if there is a distinction between the situations of inequality occurring, with regard to individuals unequally, which includes the need for implementation of affirmative action. Support for affirmative action policies are in international documents, the North-American, and the internal law, specifically in the Constitution. Nevertheless, it denotes a resistance to affirmative action, including the complicity of the public, whether by legislative omission, lack of effort - political will - the executive and the timidity of the judiciary. Making a systematic cut, this paper focuses on the issue of affirmative action in the face of two specific minority groups: blacks and women. Highlights the reasons for the historical prejudice and discrimination that these groups have suffered and points, using statistical data, the discriminatory situations still arise. Stresses the importance of affirmative action directed to the attendance of these groups, highlighting the policies already implemented.
O objetivo deste estudo é, primeiramente, justificar, a partir da análise do princípio da igualdade, as razões políticas para a desigualação de modo a assegurar efetiva igualdade material, que se concretiza na aceitação da diferença, decorrente do pluralismo político, como expresso na Constituição Federal. As desigualdades originariam-se em decorrência de fatores naturais ou de fatores históricos, culturais, sociais, econômicos ou políticos. Independentemente das razões de distinção, são necessárias políticas que permitam equilibrar ao máximo o acesso a direitos e oportunidades, a partir de instrumentos jurídicos e políticos de igualação, que se dá pelas ações afirmativas. Somente concebendo o princípio da igualdade nas suas acepções formal e material, demonstrando que só existe tratamento isonômico se houver a distinção das situações de desigualdade ocorrentes, tratando-se os indivíduos desigualmente é que se compreende a necessidade de implementação das ações afirmativas. O suporte para as políticas de ação afirmativa estão em documentos internacionais, na experiência norte-americana, e no direito interno, expressamente na Constituição Federal. Apesar disso, denota-se uma resistência as ações afirmativas, inclusive pela conivência do poder público, seja pela omissão legislativa, falta de esforço vontade política do executivo e pelo acanhamento do judiciário. Fazendo um corte sistemático, o presente trabalho enfoca o tema das ações afirmativas em face a dois grupos minoritários específicos: negros e mulheres. Destaca as razões do preconceito e discriminação histórica que este grupos têm sofrido e aponta, aproveitando dados estatísticos, as situações discriminatórias ainda ocorrentes. Assinala para a importância das ações afirmativas voltadas ao atendimento destes grupos, destacando as políticas já implementadas.
Lampron, Louis-Philippe. "L’existence d’une hiérarchie juridique favorisant la protection des convictions religieuses au sein des droits fondamentaux canadiens." Thesis, Avignon, 2010. http://www.theses.fr/2010AVIG2029/document.
Повний текст джерелаSince Dagenais c. Radio-Canada, rendered in 1994, the Supreme Court of Canada has never questioned the principle of “no legal hierarchy between the different Human Rights protected by the Canadian and Quebec charters. However, a careful review of Canadian jurisprudence on the protection of religious beliefs permits to detect a certain reluctance if not a "discomfort" of judicial institutions when they must identify clear boundaries beyond which the claims based on religious beliefs can not be constitutionnaly (or quasi-constitutionnaly) protected. This "judicial reluctance" being particular to provisions protecting religious convictions in Canada, it seemed possible to us that its impacts may be symptomatic of the implicit - but real - establishment a legal hierarchy between the various Human Rights protected by the Canadian and Quebec charters. Based on a theoretical framework inspired by the work of Rik Torfs, Professor in the Catholic University of Leuven in Belgium, and through a study focused on the context of labor relations, we intend to demonstrate that the current state of Canadian and Quebec law on claims based on different religious beliefs and customs underlies the application of a hierarchical model (the "trust model") which assigns to the provisions protecting individual religious beliefs a place among the highest in the same hierarchy. In doing so, we hope to contribute significantly to the theory of law by achieving three main objectives : (1) To establish and implement a method permitting to identify a material hierarchy between two sets of fundamental rights, (2) To expose the close relationship that may exist between the different national models of management of religious pluralism and the concept of material hierarchy among human rights, and (3) To establish the existence of a material hierarchy between constitutional Human rights in Canada through the demonstration of hierarchical imbalance favoring the provisions protecting religious beliefs within the broader set of constitutionnal Human Rights in Canada
Pinto-Ferreira, João Pedro Ramos de. "Adequação formal e garantias processuais na ação declarativa." Doctoral thesis, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/10362/104088.
Повний текст джерелаA presente dissertação incide sobre a adequação formal do processo civil declarativo em 1.ª instância. Estão, assim, em causa os poderes que o nosso ordenamento jurídico atribui ao juiz para que este flexibilize a tramitação e a forma e conteúdo dos atos processuais em face das especificidades da causa. O objetivo passa por responder a uma das principais críticas feitas à adequação formal: a de que esta pode colocar em causa as garantias processuais (com particular destaque para a previsibilidade do processo). A hipótese de investigação assenta na ideia de que a tutela dos direitos processuais fundamentais (direitos com tutela constitucional expressa ou implícita e reflexo no processo civil) traduz, em simultâneo, o fundamento e o limite dos poderes de adequação do processo pelo juiz. Entre outros aspetos, a exposição estará focada na identificação e concretização dos direitos processuais fundamentais que podem, em abstrato, ser afetados pela variação da forma legal; na análise de exemplos de adequação do processo para perceber como é que estes interagem, em concreto, com aqueles direitos; no controlo em sede de recurso da conformidade dos despachos de adequação com os direitos processuais fundamentais. A análise desenvolvida permitirá concluir que a adequação do processo opera quando, em função das especificidades da causa, a forma legal não seja adequada à tutela dos direitos processuais fundamentais ou exista uma forma alternativa que permita atingir esse propósito de modo mais eficiente. Os direitos processuais fundamentais traduzem, pois, o fundamento dos poderes de adequação formal. Além disso, será possível constatar que os direitos processuais fundamentais balizam a adequação formal, ou seja, o juiz deve ter em conta os possíveis efeitos desta nos outros direitos processuais com tutela constitucional. No fundo, impõe-se uma análise de conjunto dos direitos processuais fundamentais. É neste sentido que estes surgem como um limite à adequação formal e é também por esta razão que os despachos de adequação admitem recurso sempre que contendam com um direito processual fundamental. Em síntese, a abordagem proposta ao longo da dissertação procura assegurar a flexibilidade da tramitação do processo e da forma e conteúdo dos atos processuais e, ao mesmo tempo, salvaguardar os direitos processuais fundamentais.
Книги з теми "Formal catalogues of fundamental rights"
Great Britain: Parliament: House of Commons: European Scrutiny Committee and Michael Connarty. Forty-second report of Session 2005-06 : Documents considered by the Committee on 7 November 2006, including: Fundamental rights and citizenship programme; European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights; EC action on health services; the EU-China relationship, report, together with formal Minutes. Stationery Office, The, 2006.
Знайти повний текст джерелаGreat Britain: Parliament: House of Commons: European Scrutiny Committee and Michael Connarty. Fortieth report of Session 2005-06: Documents considered by the Committee on 1 November 2006, including, European Union Agency for Fundamental Rights, report, together with formal Minutes. Stationery Office, The, 2006.
Знайти повний текст джерелаGreat Britain: Parliament: House of Commons: European Scrutiny Committee and William Cash. Application of the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights in the UK: A State of Confusion, Forty-Third Report of Session 2013-14, Report, Together with Formal Minutes. Stationery Office, The, 2014.
Знайти повний текст джерелаMcFarlane, Ben, Nicholas Hopkins, and Sarah Nield. 7. Formal methods of acquisition:. Oxford University Press, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198722847.003.0007.
Повний текст джерелаGreat Britain: Parliament: House of Commons: European Scrutiny Committee and William Cash. Fifth Report of Session 2012-13: Documents Considered by the Committee on 20 June 2012, Including the Following Recommendations for Debate, Promoting Human Rights and Democracy in External Action; the EU Special Representative for Human Rights; the EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, Report, Together with Formal Minutes. Stationery Office, The, 2012.
Знайти повний текст джерелаGreat Britain: Parliament: House of Commons: European Scrutiny Committee and William Cash. Thirteenth report of Session 2010-11: Documents considered by the Committee on 12 January 2011, including the following recommendations for debate, road safety, Treaty change, EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, report, together with formal Minutes. Stationery Office, The, 2011.
Знайти повний текст джерелаGreat Britain: Parliament: House of Commons: European Scrutiny Committee and William Sir Cash. Thirty-Second Report of Session 2014-15: Documents Considered by the Committee on 4 February 2015, Including the Following Recommendations for Debate, Investment Plan for Europe; EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, Report, Together with Formal Minutes. Stationery Office, The, 2015.
Знайти повний текст джерелаJinks, Derek. International Human Rights Law in Time of Armed Conflict. Edited by Andrew Clapham and Paola Gaeta. Oxford University Press, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199559695.003.0026.
Повний текст джерелаRatna, Kapur. Part VII Rights—Substance and Content, Ch.41 Gender Equality. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198704898.003.0041.
Повний текст джерелаGreat Britain: Parliament: House of Commons: European Scrutiny Committee and William Sir Cash. First Report of Session 2015-16: Documents Considered by the Committee on 21 July 2015, Including the Following Recommendations for Debate, Better Regulation; the EU and the Post-2015 Development Agenda; EU General Budgets for 2015 and 2016; Economic and Monetary Union; Financial Assistance for Greece; European Agenda on Security; EU Charter of Fundamental Rights, Report, Together with Formal Minutes. Stationery Office, The, 2015.
Знайти повний текст джерелаЧастини книг з теми "Formal catalogues of fundamental rights"
Weber, Albrecht. "Structure of Fundamental Rights Catalogues." In Writing Constitutions, 23–69. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-39622-9_2.
Повний текст джерелаSchroeder, Werner. "The Rule of Law As a Value in the Sense of Article 2 TEU: What Does It Mean and Imply?" In Defending Checks and Balances in EU Member States, 105–26. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-62317-6_5.
Повний текст джерелаBriffa, Hillary, and Alessandra Baldacchino. "Diaspora Policies, Consular Services and Social Protection for Maltese Citizens Abroad." In IMISCOE Research Series, 337–55. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-51245-3_20.
Повний текст джерелаBlackburn, Robert. "The Institutions and Processes of the Convention." In Fundamental Rights In Europe, 3–29. Oxford University PressOxford, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199243488.003.0001.
Повний текст джерелаDrzemczewski, Andrew, and Marek Antoni Nowicki. "Poland." In Fundamental Rights In Europe, 657–79. Oxford University PressOxford, 2001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199243488.003.0025.
Повний текст джерелаDaka, Marija. "Trends on Fundamental Rights Protection in the European Legal Space - 2023 Prospective." In Regional Law Review, 17–31. Institute of Comparative Law, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.56461/iup_rlrc.2023.4.ch2.
Повний текст джерелаTomkin, Jonathan. "Article 53 TFEU." In The EU Treaties and the Charter of Fundamental Rights. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198759393.003.136.
Повний текст джерелаErlbacher, Friedrich. "Article 219 TFEU." In The EU Treaties and the Charter of Fundamental Rights. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198759393.003.349.
Повний текст джерелаGhai, Yash. "The Kenyan Bill of Rights: Theory and Practice." In Promoting Human Rights Through Bills of Rights: Comparative Perspectives, 187–240. Oxford University PressOxford, 2000. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198258223.003.0006.
Повний текст джерелаSchütze, Robert. "12. Limiting Powers." In European Union Law, 451–96. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198864660.003.0012.
Повний текст джерелаТези доповідей конференцій з теми "Formal catalogues of fundamental rights"
Ihuoma, Chinwe. "Achieving Sustainable Development Goal (SDG) 4 among Female Nomadic Children in Nigeria using Open and Distance Learning Strategies." In Tenth Pan-Commonwealth Forum on Open Learning. Commonwealth of Learning, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.56059/pcf10.5898.
Повний текст джерелаАхметова, А. А., and Елена Олеговна Тулупова. "THE EUROPEAN COURT OF HUMAN RIGHTS AND RUSSIA: THE EVOLUTION OF RELATIONS, THE PROBLEM OF INTERACTION AND THE LEGAL CONSEQUENCES OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION'S WITHDRAWAL FROM THE COUNCIL OF EUROPE." In ИНСТИТУТЫ ЗАЩИТЫ ПРАВ ЧЕЛОВЕКА И ГРАЖДАНИНА В ИСТОРИИ РОССИИ. Crossref, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.56777/lawinn.2023.41.28.002.
Повний текст джерелаJESKU, Franklind. "The Architecture of Hospitals. Learning From the Past." In ISSUES OF HOUSING, PLANNING, AND RESILIENT DEVELOPMENT OF THE TERRITORY Towards Euro-Mediterranean Perspectives. POLIS PRESS, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.37199/c41000110.
Повний текст джерела