Добірка наукової літератури з теми "Constitutional codification"
Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями
Ознайомтеся зі списками актуальних статей, книг, дисертацій, тез та інших наукових джерел на тему "Constitutional codification".
Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.
Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.
Статті в журналах з теми "Constitutional codification":
1
Knyazev, Sergey D., Konstantin V. Aranovskiy, and Yuri M. Danilov. "Administrative offences law (constitutional prospects of codification)." Law Enforcement Review 4, no. 3 (October 5, 2020): 123–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.24147/2542-1514.2020.4(3).123-138.
Анотація:
The subject of the research is the problems of constitutional law enforcement of administrative offences legislation, taking into account the prospects for its new codification. The purpose of the article is confirmation or confutation of the hypothesis that the effectiveness of the new Code of administrative offences depends on whether the legal positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation on the principles of administrative responsibility will be taken into account when drafting it. The authors use methods of complex analysis, synthesis, as well as formal-legal method of interpretation of Constitution, legislation on administrative offences and judicial decisions of Russian Constitutional Court. The main results and scope of their application. The administrative torts law in Russia is expected to pass through the total review up to the grounds of its codification in close future. The article presents initial positions of that changes within basic frames produced by Russian Constitutional Court. Its case-law has already invaded into many spheres and details in respective sphere of legal rules and also prescribed a lot for their future. This case-law yet is necessarily made within its inherent range for it is ever constrained procedurally by content of actions and cases to be settled. However Russian administrative torts law is destined for reformation in new code-making in view of constitutional case-law and in order to do better with neighbor spheres of legal responsibility. Disputable matters of administrative liability, the company’s responsibility with psychical fiction on its fault (corporative thinking, wishing, desire, diligence), substantial and procedural equity etc. are described and discussed in the article as to the administrative law of torts on in its constitutional dimension. Conclusions. The Code of administrative offences of the Russian Federation does not fully meet the legal needs of society. Work on real improvement of this code will continue, therefore, legal science should be more strongly and persistently to implement in legislative practice constitutional ideas about improvement of codification and ensuring unity of legal space of the country. In particular, it is necessary to settle the debatable aspects of tort liability, the guilt of legal entities when it is addressed by fiction to the phenomena of the psyche (thinking, goals, will, caution), the constitutional and legal foundations of justice in the field of administrative penalties, procedural enforcement of rights and freedoms, etc.
2
Schmidt-Aßmann, Eberhard. "CODIFICATION OF ADMINISTRATIVE PROCEDURAL LAW: TRADITIONS AND MODELS." Administrative law and process, no. 3(26) (2019): 89–112. http://dx.doi.org/10.17721/2227-796x.2019.3.06.
Анотація:
The contribution explains the underlying rationale, objectives and constitutional framework for administrative procedural law. Furthermore, the arguments for and against comprehensive codification of administrative procedural rules, as well as the most significant elements of administrative procedural law, are discussed. Lastly, possible models for codification are presented, namely the German Law on Administrative Procedure, the US Administrative Procedure Act and the ReNEUAL Model Rules on EU Administrative Procedure.
3
van Biezen, Ingrid, and Gabriela Borz. "Models of party democracy: patterns of party regulation in post-war European constitutions." European Political Science Review 4, no. 3 (January 20, 2012): 327–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s1755773911000294.
Анотація:
This article investigates the ways in which political parties are codified in modern democratic constitutions, providing a unique cross-sectional and longitudinal overview of the patterns of party constitutionalization in post-war Europe. Although the constitutions of western liberal democracies traditionally have paid little attention to the role of parties, evidence suggests that in contemporary democracies, both old and new, they are increasingly accorded a formal constitutional status. Little is known, however, about the substantive content of their constitutional position or about the normative connotations of their constitutional codification. In this article, we demonstrate that there is a clear correlation between the nature and the intensity of party constitutionalization and the newness and historical experience of democracy and that, with time, the constitutional regulation of the extra-parliamentary organization and the parties’ rights and duties has gained in importance at the expense of their parliamentary and electoral roles. The analysis furthermore suggests that three distinct models of party constitutionalization can be identified – Defending Democracy, Parties in Public Office, and Parties as Public Utilities – each of which is related to a particular conception of party democracy.
4
Marmilova, Ekaterina. "EVALUATION OF THE STATEMENT OF TATIANA MASLOVSKAYA ABOUT THE NEW TRENDS IN ELECTORAL LAW IN THE CIS COUNTRIES IN THE PERIOD FROM 2017 TILL 2019." Proceedings of CBU in Social Sciences 2 (October 24, 2021): 253–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.12955/pss.v2.230.
Анотація:
During the period from 2017 till 2019, there is a tendency of acceptance of new norms in Electoral Codes and Constitutional laws in the CIS countries. The author analyzed the hypothesis by Tatiana Maslovskaya about the evolution of electoral legislation in the CIS countries and new trends as codification, globalization, democratization in electoral law, by making the analysis of the amendments to the Electoral Codes and Constitutional Laws of the CIS countries in the period from 2017 to 2019. The globalization trend of electoral legislation in the CIS countries was not clearly expressed in those amendments, additions that were adopted in the research period.
Conclusions: There is a tendency for individual CIS countries to codify their electoral legislation in codification format since they haven't done it before. The democratization trend is clearly expressed in the amendments.
5
Yurko, S. S. "Procedure for consideration of cases of constitutional jurisdiction in Ukraine." Uzhhorod National University Herald. Series: Law 1, no. 79 (October 9, 2023): 177–81. http://dx.doi.org/10.24144/2307-3322.2023.79.1.30.
Анотація:
The article is devoted to the study of problems and prospects of legal regulation of the procedure for consideration of cases of constitutional jurisdiction in Ukraine. The author establishes that the tasks entrusted to the single body of constitutional jurisdiction by the Constitution and the Law «On the Constitutional Court of Ukraine» are implemented in the form of judicial constitutional proceedings, i.e., a special judicial procedure. Currently, such a procedure is generally provided for in Section 2 of the Law of Ukraine «On the Constitutional Court of Ukraine» and the Rules of Procedure of the Constitutional Court. Most of the judicial procedures for consideration of cases of constitutional jurisdiction are defined at the level of by-laws. The author believes that this approach is erroneous, since Article 19 of the Constitution of Ukraine provides that state and local self-government bodies and their officials are obliged to act only on the basis, within the limits of their powers and in the manner provided for by the Constitution and laws of Ukraine.
It is established that the Venice Commission has drawn its attention to the procedural problems of the Constitutional Court in terms of legislative regulation of the divergence of judicial practice, the need for legislative detail and specification of important parts of the procedural aspects of the court’s activities. It has been established that a number of European countries have special codes of constitutional jurisdiction or similar procedural laws.
For example, the Code of Constitutional Jurisdiction of the Republic of Moldova of 16 June 1995 has a much higher quality of legal technique than similar procedural provisions of the Law of Ukraine «On the Constitutional Court of Ukraine».
In order to address the above issues, the Draft Law on Constitutional Procedure No 4533 of 21 December 2020 is currently being considered by the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine. While supporting the main objectives of this Draft Law, the author identifies its significant shortcomings which offset the positive novelties proposed by it. It is emphasised that the relevant legislative work should be based on the national doctrine of constitutional law, the experience of codification of procedural legislation of other branches of law and relevant foreign experience.
6
Kovač, Polonca. "The Requirements and Limits of the Codification of Administrative Procedures in Slovenia According to European Trends." Review of Central and East European Law 41, no. 3-4 (November 11, 2016): 427–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15730352-04103007.
Анотація:
In regulating administrative procedures, legislators at the national and European levels should devote special attention to the codification of procedural rights in administrative relations that are recognized as European principles of good administration. Furthermore, there is a normative issue to be addressed between a more or less centralized general codification, with common minimum standards applying in any kind of administrative relation, and the admissibility of special procedural rules adapted to the specifics of individual administrative areas. A comparative analysis of the Slovenian General Administrative Procedure Act and eu standards regarding principles of administrative procedures is conducted in order to identify the role of principles, such as the right to be heard, the right of access to information, and the right to legal protection, on the national level. An additional analysis of the case law of the Slovenian Constitutional Court shows that the general codification of respective procedural rights is indispensable in pursuing the principle of the equal protection of rights. The Slovenian case can serve as a model for other, especially Eastern European, countries. The author argues that there is a need for general codification, which should not be overly detailed, but which should still serve the basic objectives of administrative procedures, namely ensuring substantive rights and the most important legal interests of the parties, in addition to guaranteeing effective protection of the public interest. At the same time, special rules should be allowed as exceptions in order to regulate sector-specific aspects, while nonetheless ensuring that such rules remain in compliance with European and constitutional procedural principles.
7
Cramér, Per. "Does the Codification of the Principle of Supremacy Matter?" Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 7 (2005): 57–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.5235/152888712802730828.
Анотація:
A little more than four decades ago, the European Court of Justice declared that the law of the European Communities constitutes the supreme law of the Member States. The national institutions, most importantly the national courts, were to apply rules of Community law and, in so doing, were required to set aside conflicting provisions of national law, however framed. Since then, this judicially formulated constitutional principle has been developed and restated in later judgments by the ECJ. However, during the same period the absolute character of the principle has been continually challenged by the Member States.
8
Cramér, Per. "Does the Codification of the Principle of Supremacy Matter?" Cambridge Yearbook of European Legal Studies 7 (2005): 57–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s152888700000450x.
Анотація:
A little more than four decades ago, the European Court of Justice declared that the law of the European Communities constitutes the supreme law of the Member States. The national institutions, most importantly the national courts, were to apply rules of Community law and, in so doing, were required to set aside conflicting provisions of national law, however framed. Since then, this judicially formulated constitutional principle has been developed and restated in later judgments by the ECJ. However, during the same period the absolute character of the principle has been continually challenged by the Member States.
9
Knyazev, Sergey D. "Codification of Laws on the Administrative Liability within the Framework of Legal Positions of the Constitutional Court of the Russian Federation Revisited." Administrative law and procedure 2 (February 24, 2022): 6–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.18572/2071-1166-2022-2-6-14.
Анотація:
On the basis of detailed analysis of legal positions of the Constitutional Court of Russia the article presents research of key parameters of modern codification of legislation on administrative liability. The author believes that successful achieving the goals of such codification requires, as a matter of principle importance, definition of its scope within legal branches, clarification of distinction between federal and regional powers in the relevant sphere of legal regulation, introduction of necessary amendments to the whole set of institutes (norms) of General and Special parts of the Code on Administrative Offences of the Russian Federation, as well as ensuring development and adoption of a separate Procedural Code of the Russian Federation on Administrative Offences.
10
Kovač, Polonca. "Inspection Regulation between General Procedural Codification and Field Specifics – a Case Study of Slovenia." DANUBE: Law and Economics Review 7, no. 1 (March 1, 2016): 1–17. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/danb-2016-0001.
Анотація:
Abstract Inspection, as the authoritative supervision of private liable persons to comply their activities with sector-specific laws, should ensure the full implementation of public policies. Slovenia adopted the Inspection Act (IA) in 2002, in order to conduct efficient inspection, and simultaneously guarantee the defence rights of the supervised parties pursuant to the fundamental principles of the EU, the national Constitution, and general Administrative Procedure Act. This article addresses the search for a balance between general codification and sector-related specifics as stipulated by the IA, applying normative, constitutional case law and comparative methods. Special attention is dedicated to the IA rules regarding participants, their legal protection and stages of respective proceedings. It has been concluded that the most of the IA specifics are justified in order to efficiently serve the public interest. This study reveals that the Slovene IA can represent a role model for efficient yet democratic supervision in other MS as well.
Дисертації з теми "Constitutional codification":
1
Vidot, Agnès. "La codification constitutionnelle des droits fondamentaux : Recherche sur l'absence de catalogue formel de droits fondamentaux dans la Constitution française du 4 octobre 1958." Electronic Thesis or Diss., La Réunion, 2023. http://www.theses.fr/2023LARE0031.
Анотація:
Le rapprochement de la Constitution du 4 octobre 1958 des constitutions étrangères permet de mettre en lumière une particularité de l’ordre constitutionnel français. Notre loi fondamentale n’a jamais été dotée, au terme d’une opération de codification, d’un quelconque catalogue formel de droits fondamentaux comparable à ceux qui ont été introduits dès le début du XXème siècle dans d’autres États. Si elle n’est pas complètement ignorée, l’exception française a été assez peu interrogée. Que la rencontre entre droits fondamentaux et codification n’ait jamais eu lieu en France, volontiers désignée comme « pays des droits de l’homme » et « terre d’élection de la codification », ne peut pourtant manquer de retenir l’attention. La question se pose en particulier de savoir si la singularité de notre texte constitutionnel, saillante et intrigante, s’avère, en outre, irréductible. L’histoire de cette rencontre qui n’a jamais eu lieu est-elle, autrement exprimé, celle de rendez-vous manqués ou d’une liaison impossible ? La recherche se propose d’interroger tant la possibilité de codifier les droits fondamentaux dans la Constitution française du 4 octobre 1958, que l’utilité d’une telle opérationThe comparison of the Constitution of October 4, 1958 with the foreign constitutions allows to highlight a specific feature of the French constitutional order. Our fundamental law has never been endowed, after a codification exercise, with any formal catalogue of fundamental rights comparable to those which were introduced from the beginning of the 20th century in other States. While it is not completely ignored, the French exception has been barely discussed. The fact that the meeting between fundamental rights and codification has never taken place in France, willingly referred to as the “country of human rights” and the “chosen land of codification”, cannot however fail to attract attention. In particular, the question arises whether the singularity of our constitutional text, which is both salient and intriguing, is also irreducible. In other words, is the story of this meeting that never took place the story of missed appointments or of an impossible relationship ? The research aims to question both the possibility of codifying fundamental rights in the French Constitution of October 4, 1958, and the usefulness of such an operation
2
Кошіль, Наталія Михайлівна. "Систематизація конституційного законодавства України". Thesis, Одеса, 2017. http://hdl.handle.net/11300/7812.
Анотація:
Кошіль Н. М. Систематизація конституційного законодавства України : дис.. … канд. юрид наук : 12.00.02 / Кошіль Наталія Михайлівна. – Одеса, 2017. – 187 с.Дисертація є першим у національній юридичній науці дослідженням систематизації конституційного законодавства України, в якому виявлено перспективи інкорпорації, консолідації та кодифікації конституційного законодавства України та розроблено конкретні пропозиції. Визначено, що систематизація конституційного законодавства України – це результат впорядкування та зведення до єдності положень нормативно-правових актів та міжнародних договорів, згода на обов’язковість яких надана Верховною Радою України, які регламентують однорідні суспільні відносини, що складаються стосовно основ правового становища особистості, юридичної організації держави, у процесі здійснення публічної (державної і публічно-самоврядної) влади та її взаємодії з громадянським суспільством і населенням країни. У дисертації сформульовано мету систематизації конституційного законодавства України, виявлено задачі систематизації конституційного законодавства України, розкрито особливості застосування таких форм систематизації законодавства, як інкорпорація, кодифікація та консолідація, щодо конституційного законодавства.
Диссертация является первым в национальной юридической науке исследованием систематизации конституционного законодательства Украины, в котором выявлены перспективы инкорпорации, консолидации и кодификации конституционного законодательства Украины и разработаны конкретные предложения.Определено, что систематизация конституционного законодательства Украины – это результат упорядочивания и объединения положений нормативно-правовых актов и международных договоров, согласие на обязательность которых дано Верховной Радой Украины, регламентирующих однородные общественные отношения, складывающиеся в отношении основ правового положения личности, юридической организации государства, в процессе осуществления публичной (государственной и публично-самоуправляющейся) власти и ее взаимодействия с гражданским обществом и населением страны. Сформулированы цель систематизации конституционного законодательства Украины – составление, приведение в систему нормативно-правовых актов и международных договоров, согласие на обязательность которых дано Верховной Радой Украины, регламентирующих общественные отношения, составляющие предмет конституционного права. Выявлены задачи систематизации конституционного законодательства Украины – содействие последовательной реализации принципов современного украинского конституционализма (концептуальная задача), устранение дефектов и пробелов в конституционном праве, обеспечение доступа к конституционному законодательству и удобства пользования ним. Раскрыты особенности применения таких форм систематизации законодательства, как инкорпорация, кодификация и консолидация, по отношению к конституционному законодательству. При исследовании потенциала инкорпорации конституционного законодательства Украины выявлено, что было бы неверным рассматривать ее исключительно как форму систематизации, которая предшествует консолидации или кодификации конституционного законодательства. Выявлено, что сейчас по отношению к конституционному законодательству Украины применяется исключительно частичная инкорпорация (как официальная, так и неофициальная). С целью повышения эффективности неофициальных частных инкорпораций конституционного законодательства Украины сформулированы рекомендации о сочетании инкорпорации конституционного законодательства как с инкорпорацией других отраслевых актов, так и с инкорпорацией судебных решений. Аргументировано, что при этом следует отдавать предпочтение сначала предметному, а затем хронологическому критериям инкорпорации. Выявлено, что в настоящее время в Украине осуществляется лишь частичная консолидация конституционного законодательства (официальная или неофициальная). В случае необходимости проведения полной консолидации конституционного законодательства Украины предложено обращаться к опыту зарубежных стран, например США. Сформулировано, что кодифицированные акты, входящие в состав конституционного законодательства Украины, в основном имеют комплексный межотраслевой характер: Кодекс административного судопроизводства, Основы законодательства Украины об общеобязательном государственном социальном страховании, Основы законодательства Украины о здравоохранении и др. В процессе исследования перспектив тематической систематизации конституционного законодательства Украины аргументировано отсутствие необходимости разработки и принятия по аналогии с Кодексом административного судопроизводства Украины Кодекса конституционного судопроизводства Украины, Кодекса прав и свобод человека и гражданина в Украине, а также обоснована целесообразность разработки и принятия Избирательного кодекса Украины. Избирательный кодекс Украины предложено структурировать следующим образом: преамбула, общая часть, особенная часть. В этом нормативно-правовом акте следует кодифицировать нормы Законов «О выборах народных депутатов Украины», «О выборах Президента Украины» и «О местных выборах». Также в него должны войти те нормы Законов «О Центральной избирательной комиссии» и «О Государственном реестре избирателей», которые имеют отношение к выборам. При исследовании перспектив систематизации актов органов местного самоуправления в Украине рекомендовано: а) применять консолидацию для создания Свода нормативно-правовых актов органов местного самоуправления города, поселка, села; б) считать одним из признаков устава территориальной общины города, поселка, села его кодифицированный характер и систематизировать в нем нормы о формах непосредственной демократии в селе, поселке, городе.
The dissertation is the first national study of Ukrainian constitutional legislation’s systematization, as well as the research of the prospects of incorporation, consolidation and codification of the Ukrainian constitutional legislation. The author determines that the Ukrainian constitutional legislation’s systematization is the result of the constructed in a single document provisions of the national legal acts and international treaties ratified by the Verkhovna Rada of Ukraine, which regulate the social relations, consisting of the legal status of the individual, the legal organization state and the implementation of public (state and public self-governing) government and its interaction with civil society and the population. The author formulates the goal of the Ukrainian constitutional legislation’s systematization, reveals the problems of the Ukrainian constitutional legislation’s systematization, characterizes the features of such forms of the Ukrainian constitutional legislation’s systematization as incorporation, codification and consolidation.
3
Rrapi, Patricia. "L'accessibilité et l'intelligibilité de la loi en droit constitutionnel : étude du discours sur la "qualité de la loi"." Thesis, Aix-Marseille, 2012. http://www.theses.fr/2012AIXM1051.
Анотація:
L'objectif de valeur constitutionnelle d'accessibilité et d'intelligibilité de la loi, largement inspiré du discours sur la « qualité de la loi », semble consister, dans la jurisprudence du Conseil constitutionnel, en deux exigences différentes : la capacité de la loi à avertir le citoyen et la soumission de l'administration et du juge au respect de la loi. Cette étude propose une dissociation de ces deux exigences, qui renvoient à deux « qualités » distinctes de la loi : celle ex ante et celle ex post. Alors que la « qualité » ex post concerne la prédétermination de l'utilisation du texte par les autorités chargées d'appliquer la loi, la « qualité » ex ante renvoie à l'information du citoyen sur la législation en vigueur et implique un renouvellement du rapport préjuridique du citoyen au droit. Cette étude propose également une comparaison entre la jurisprudence de la Cour suprême des États-Unis – « Vagueness doctrine » – et la jurisprudence du Conseil constitutionnel relative à la « qualité de la loi »The « Quality of law » doctrine, as found in the jurisprudence of the Constitutional Council, has two functions. First it means that a citizen must have notice of a law before it is applied to him; and second that a statute's text must be sufficiently « clear » in order to avoid arbitrary enforcement. This thesis proposes a distinction between these two functions of the « Quality of Law » doctrine; the first reflecting an ex ante principle and the latter an ex post principle. Whereas the ex post « quality » deals with misuse of the statute's text by authorities charged with enforcement, the ex ante function – fair notice of laws in force – requires a more modern meaning as the nature of law changes and its delivery becomes more fractured and unpredictable. This thesis includes a comparison of the French doctrine with a parallel doctrine in American Constitutional Law – the « Vagueness doctrine »
4
Macario, Mariana Pedron. "José Clemente Pereira e o debate jurídico do Império 1830-1850." Universidade de São Paulo, 2011. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/2/2139/tde-15052012-091245/.
Анотація:
O presente trabalho trata de alguns temas do debate jurídico da primeira metade do século XIX. Estes temas são analisados a partir da participação do magistrado e político José Clemente Pereira. É o momento do esforço de criação de uma legislação nacional, necessária em decorrência do rompimento dos laços com Portugal. Nascido em Portugal em 1787, formado em Coimbra, Clemente Pereira imigrou para o Brasil em 1815. Rapidamente ascendeu nos negócios e na carreira política, participando das articulações que levaram à independência e se tornando muito influente na capital fluminense em razão de negócios no mercado de gêneros de abastecimento e de sua atuação como advogado dos grandes comerciantes da Corte. Foi juiz de fora, deputado geral, ministro do império, da guerra e da marinha, senador, conselheiro de estado e presidente do primeiro Tribunal do Comércio do Brasil. A partir dessas posições participou e influenciou vários debates sobre temas políticos e jurídicos, entre os quais escolhemos três: a criação da lei de responsabilidade dos ministros de Estado, de 1827; os debates sobre o Código Criminal do Império, criado em 1830, e do Código Comercial, de 1850. Os debates mostram os desafios que estavam colocados para a formação do Estado e da nação brasileiros, num contexto de transformação do direito representado pelo moderno ideário de codificação, e mudanças na política, com a crescente centralização do poder monárquico, mas também com sua limitação a partir do advento do constitucionalismo.This paper aims at discussing some aspects of the legal debate that took place during the first half of the XIXth Century. Said aspects are assessed from the moment Justice and Politician José Clemente Pereira appears in the public scenario. It is the moment when strengths are gathered to create a national legislation, then mandatory due to the rupture of bonds with Portugal. Born in Portugal in 1787, graduate at the University of Coimbra, Clemente Pereira immigrated to Brazil in 1815. He rapidly gained importance as a businessman and as a politician, taking part in the discussions that lead to the Independence and becoming quite influential in the Court due to his business and his work as an attorney for major traders. He was a judge, congressman, a ministry of the Empire, of War and Navy, a Senator, a State Counselor, and the Chairman of the first Board of Trade of Brazil. After occupying the afore mentioned positions, he acted as an influential player in several debates about legal and political matters, among which we chose three: the creation of the act of liability for ministries of State of 1827; the debates on the Criminal Code of the Empire, created in 1830, and of the Commercial Code of 1850. The debates show the challenges that were set for the establishment of the Brazilian State and Nation, in a context of transformation of the Law represented by the modern set of codification ideas and changes in politics, with the growing centralization of monarchical power, but also with its limitation, starting with the onset of constitutionalism.
5
Barbuy, Victor Emanuel Vilela. "Idéias jurídicas de José de Alencar." Universidade de São Paulo, 2014. http://www.teses.usp.br/teses/disponiveis/2/2131/tde-13022015-134909/.
Анотація:
No presente trabalho, analisaremos as ideias jurídicas de José de Alencar (1829-1877), procurando demonstrar que este não foi somente um dos mais proeminentes vultos das letras pátrias e um dos mais destacados publicistas, políticos e oradores do Brasil de seu tempo, mas também um importante jurista. Embora o jurisconsulto José de Alencar seja inegavelmente menor do que o literato e mesmo que o homem de Estado, não deixa ele de ter sua relevância, merecendo, pois, ser mais conhecido e reconhecido do que tem sido. Em nossa exposição de suas ideias em diversos campos do Direito, nos concentramos mais naquelas que reputamos mais importantes social, política e historicamente, particularmente naquelas referentes à relação entre a Lei Natural e a Lei Positiva, à Constituição Imperial, ao Poder Moderador, à representação política, à abolição da escravatura, à codificação civil e à propriedade.In this work we will analyse the juridical ideas of José de Alencar (1829-1877), seeking to demonstrate that he was not only one of the most prominent figures of the Brazilian literature and one of the most distinguished journalists, political writers, politicians and orators of the Brazil of his time but also an important jurist. Although the jurisconsult José de Alencar is unquestionably smaller in importance than the writer and even the man of State he does not lack relevance, thus deserving to be more known and recognised. In our exposition of his ideas in different fields of law we will concentrate more on those that we consider more important socially, politically and historically, particularly on the ones which refer to the relation between Natural Law and Positive Law, the Imperial Constitution, the Moderator Power, the political representation, the abolition of slavery, the civil codification and the property.
6
Jivan, Usha Ashwin. "A gender equality perspective on the non-recognition of Muslim marriages." Diss., 1997. http://hdl.handle.net/10500/17014.
Анотація:
Generally, traditional "marriages" according to Islamic custom are void in
South African law because they are potentially polygynous and do not
comply with the formalities prescribed by the Marriage Act 25 of 1961 . A
valid concern for those who oppose polygyny is that it may enforce and
promote gender inequality in that it is practised in patriarchal Muslim
societies. The Constitution of the Republic of South Africa Act 108 of 1996
contains numerous provisions aimed at combating gender inequalities, and
these could be used to justify the policy of non-recognition. On the other
hand, the Constitution has ushered in an era of tolerance and empathy; and
the equality and religion clauses could be used to ensure that polygynous
marriages are no longer ignored.
This study will examine the tensions between Muslim personal law and
clauses in the Constitution which have led to calls for the reformation and
codification of Muslim personal law.Private Law
LL. M.
Книги з теми "Constitutional codification":
1
Constitution, Canada. A consolidation of the Constitution Acts, 1867 to 1982 =: Codification administrative des Lois constitutionnelles de 1867 à 1982. Ottawa, Ont: Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada = Ministre des travaux publics et services gouvernementaux Canada, 1998.
2
Constitution, Canada. A consolidation of the Constitution Acts, 1867 to 1982 =: Codification administrative des Lois constitutionnelles de 1867 à 1982. Ottawa, Ont: Minister of Public Works and Government Services Canada = Ministre des travaux publics et services gouvernementaux Canada, 1999.
3
Constitution, Canada. A consolidation of the Constitution Acts, 1867 to 1982 =: Codification administrative des Lois constitutionnelles de 1867 à 1982. Ottawa, Ont: Dept. of Justice = Ministère de la justice, 1989.
4
Constitution, Canada. A consolidation of the Constitution Acts, 1867 to 1982 =: Codification administrative des Lois constitutionnelles de 1867 à 1982. Ottawa, Ont: Dept. of Justice = Ministère de la justice, 2001.
5
Constitution, Canada. A consolidation of the Constitution Acts, 1867 to 1982 =: Codification administrative des Lois constitutionnelles de 1867 à 1982. Ottawa, Ont: Minister of Supply and Services Canada = Ministre des approvisionnements et services Canada, 1996.
6
Scholler, Heinrich. Ethiopian constitutional and legal development. Köln: R. Köppe, 2005.
7
Scholler, Heinrich. Ethiopian constitutional and legal development. Köln: R. Köppe, 2005.
8
Scholler, Heinrich. Ethiopian constitutional and legal development. Köln: R. Köppe, 2005.
9
Scholler, Heinrich. Ethiopian constitutional and legal development. Köln: R. Köppe, 2005.
10
Richard, Novak. Zur Neukodifikation des österreichischen Bundesverfassungsrechts. Wien: Österreichische Staatsdruckerei, 1994.
Частини книг з теми "Constitutional codification":
1
EJIMA, Akiko. "A Possibility of the Multi-layered Human Rights Implementation System Underpinned by the Simultaneous Codification of the Constitution of Japan and the International Human Rights Treaty." In Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law, 297–312. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-03455-3_15.
2
Albert, Richard. "Finding Constitutional Amendments." In Constitutional Amendments, 229–60. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780190640484.003.0007.
Анотація:
Constitutional designers rarely ask many questions they should. How and where will the constitution indicate that it has been amended? Will it record the change at the end of the original constitution, or will the change be inserted directly into the founding text? And what about an uncodified constitution: How will it identify constitution-level changes? This chapter offers the first analysis into the options available to constitutional designers for codifying constitutional amendments. This chapter identifies and illustrates the four major models of amendment codification in the world: the appendative model in the United States, the integrative model in India, the invisible model in Ireland, and the disaggregative model in Great Britain. How and where to memorialize changes to the constitution entails implications for how interpreters of constitutional meaning will read the constitution in the course of adjudication, whether the constitution will become a focal point of reference in constitutional politics, and how intensely citizens will venerate their constitution. The way amendments are recorded is ultimately a choice about how and indeed whether a people chooses to remember its past. Today constitutional designers do not consider the consequences of amendment codification, but they should. This chapter explains why the choices involved in amendment codification concern more than mere aesthetics. This chapter considers constitutions from Canada, Great Britain, India, Ireland, Israel, Mexico, New Zealand, Norway, Saint Lucia, Spain, and the United States.
3
"V. THE ERA OF CODIFICATION." In Is NAFTA Constitutional?, 97–107. Harvard University Press, 1995. http://dx.doi.org/10.4159/harvard.9780674187757.c6.
4
Pfrunder, Caspar. "Amendment Codification in Switzerland." In The Architecture of Constitutional Amendments. Hart Publishing, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781509959112.ch-013.
5
Schofield, Philip. "Codification, Constitutional Law, and Republicanism." In Utility and Democracy, 221–49. Oxford University Press, 2006. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198208563.003.0009.
6
Parpworth, Neil. "10. Constitutional conventions." In Constitutional and Administrative Law, 226–42. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198847120.003.0010.
Анотація:
After the legal sources of the UK constitution considered in previous chapters, this chapter turns its attention to an important non-legal source of the UK constitution: its constitutional conventions. It will be shown that constitutional conventions relate to practical and significant political matters which allow the UK constitution to function. They also represent a means by which the executive branch can be made accountable for its actions. The discussion explores the nature of constitutional conventions, gives examples of constitutional conventions, enforcing conventions, the Cabinet Manual, and investigates the courts and conventions. Codification of conventions and the importance of conventions in relation to devolution is also discussed.
7
Nakashidze, Malkhaz. "Georgia’s Model of Constitutional Amendment Codification." In The Architecture of Constitutional Amendments. Hart Publishing, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781509959112.ch-017.
8
Vorpsi, Arta. "One Constitution, Two Models of Codification." In The Architecture of Constitutional Amendments. Hart Publishing, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781509959112.ch-016.
9
Kaino, Michihiro. "Bentham’s Constitutional Code and His Pannomion." In Bentham on Democracy, Courts, and Codification, 315–36. Cambridge University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/9781009031745.017.
10
Cunha, Bruno. "The Codification of Constitutional Amendments in Brazil." In The Architecture of Constitutional Amendments. Hart Publishing, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.5040/9781509959112.ch-005.
Тези доповідей конференцій з теми "Constitutional codification":
1
Mahingoda, Chaga Bihari. "UK Constitution: Should it be Codified." In SLIIT INTERNATIONAL CONFERENCE ON ADVANCEMENTS IN SCIENCES AND HUMANITIES [SICASH]. Faculty of Humanities and Sciences, SLIIT, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.54389/xcqq5827.
Анотація:
A Constitution is a vital part of a State, as it encompasses the fundamental principles and rules upon which a state exists. Considering the Constitution of the United Kingdom (UK) and the Constitution of Sri Lanka, there is an apparent difference: Sri Lanka operates upon the powers derived from a Codified Constitution, whereas the UK does not have a Codified Constitution but rather an array of legislation, judge-made laws and regulations. The system of laws and regulations within the UK has been encompassed in an Uncodified Constitution. Several academics and organizations have advocated for the codification of the British Constitution based on a balance of the power of the executive, stability, and clarity hoping to provide a clearer and more straightforward arrangement of the fundamental rules and principles according to which the state is established and governed. However, other scholars have contested it on the basis that it would make the Constitution conservative and anti-rationalist, and that it would be a rather disruptive process. The EU referendum in 2016, the EU withdrawal and other reforms have further added to this debate. Within this article, we closely observe and dissect the ongoing debate on the codification of the UK Constitution. Keywords: British Constitution; Codified Constitution; Uncodified Constitution
2
Kolumber, David. "Protistátní trestné činy v moderních kodifikacích." In Protistátní trestné činy včera a dnes. Brno: Masaryk University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.5817/cz.muni.p210-9976-2021-4.
Анотація:
The contribution “Anti-state Crimes in Modern Codifications” deals with the topic of anti-state crimes during centuries. Firstly, legal concepts in the pre-state period are mentioned. Then the attention is paid on the evolution of this institute in the Euro-Atlantic area. From this point of view, there are mentioned mainly regulations from England (1351), France (1810), Germany (1871) and Soviet Union (1958) which could be remarked as the most important for the development of other countries. On the other hand, it also reminds the development of codifications in Czechoslovakia, the Czech Republic and Slovakia, which were affected by the Austro-Hungarian legislations as well as German and Soviet approaches. The Czech current arrangement generally does not depart from the other European samples, but it cannot be omitted that in the Czech Republic it is distinguished the penal concept of the high treason (Landesverrat, vlastizrada) from the constitutional concept (Hochverrat, velezrada) which is dedicated to the presidential anti-state activities. The contribution also indicates that the concept of anti-state crimes in countries has not been unified and it has been varying according to various experiences and attitudes.
3
Machado, Luan Theodoro. "Interim relief: Historical evolution and controversial points in the 2015 code of civil procedure." In III SEVEN INTERNATIONAL MULTIDISCIPLINARY CONGRESS. Seven Congress, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.56238/seveniiimulti2023-172.
Анотація:
Introduction: This article proposes a brief historical analysis of the evolution of provisional protection in the Brazilian legal system, followed by a discussion of the application of the institute within the scope of the 2015 Code of Civil Procedure, specifically dealing with the problems involving the modalities of urgency and evidence. Objective: It is known that the 2015 Code of Civil Procedure brought a new look to the old precautionary guardianship, which in addition to being renamed, was adapted to the constitutional vision of the effectiveness of the process. However, the novelties presented, although virtuous, have brought to light some points of practical conflict, such as: fungibility, granting provisional relief ex officio, provisional relief on appeal, reversibility of the measure, partial anticipation and stabilization of the guardianship, which this article seeks to analyze. Justification: This research is relevant because it aims to bring to the center of the study the historical context of interim relief in order to understand its evolution and from there, interpret the problems that have arisen in the current procedural conjuncture. Methodology: In short, the research was carried out using a qualitative approach, the bibliographical review procedure and inductive-deductive logic, in order to carry out a theoretical survey of the problem presented and apply it to the content studied. Secondary sources were also used, especially publications in books, academic studies and scientific articles that cover the central question of the research. Conclusion and result: In the end, it can be concluded that provisional protection has been present in our legal system since the beginning of the codifications, although usually identified by other names. Hence its importance in the legal world. On the other hand, the study identified that interim relief is a complex institute that should always be studied for the sake of efficient judicial protection.