Увійти

Готові списки джерел за темами / Head restraints / Книги

Щоб переглянути інші типи публікацій з цієї теми, перейдіть за посиланням: Head restraints.

Книги з теми "Head restraints"

Автор: Grafiati

Опубліковано: 10 січня 2023

Оновлено: 28 січня 2023

Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями

Оберіть тип джерела:

Ознайомтеся з топ-20 книг для дослідження на тему "Head restraints".

Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.

Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.

Переглядайте книги для різних дисциплін та оформлюйте правильно вашу бібліографію.

1

Desapriya, Ediriweera. Head restraints and whiplash: The past, present, and future. New York: Nova Science Publishers, 2010.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

2

Ediriweera, Desapriya, ed. Head restraints and whiplash: The past, present, and future. Hauppauge, N.Y: Nova Science Publishers, 2010.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

3

United Nations Conference on Trade and Development. Intergovernmental Group of Experts on Restrictive Business Practices. Report of the Intergovernmental Group of Experts on Restrictive Business Practices on its Eighth Session, held at the Palais des Nations, Geneva, from 23 to 27 October 1989. Geneva: United Nations, 1990.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

4

1957-, Eisenach Jeffrey A., Lenard Thomas M, and Progress & Freedom Foundation (U.S.), eds. Competition, innovation, and the Microsoft monopoly: Antitrust in the digital marketplace : proceedings of a conference held by the Progress & Freedom Foundation in Washington, DC, February 5, 1998. Boston, Mass: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1999.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

5

Library, The Law. Federal Motor Vehicle Safety Standards - Head Restraints. CreateSpace Independent Publishing Platform, 2018.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

6

Four Points Restraints: Demon in My Head. Independently Published, 2017.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

7

Bird, Wendell. The Revolution in Freedoms of Press and Speech. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197509197.001.0001.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

This book discusses the revolutionary broadening of concepts of freedoms of press and speech in Great Britain and in America during the quarter century before the First Amendment and Fox’s Libel Act. The conventional view of the history of freedoms of press and speech is that the common law since antiquity defined those freedoms narrowly. In that view, Sir William Blackstone in 1769, and Lord Chief Justice Mansfield in 1770, faithfully summarized that common law in giving very narrow definitions of those freedoms as mere liberty from prior restraint and not as liberty from punishment after printing or speaking (the political crimes of seditious libel and seditious speech). Today, that view continues to be held by neo-Blackstonians, and remains dominant or at least very influential among historians. Neo-Blackstonians claim that the Framers used freedom of press “in a Blackstonian sense to mean a guarantee against previous restraints” with no protection against “subsequent restraints” (punishment) of seditious expression. Neo-Blackstonians further claim that “[n]o other definition of freedom of the press by anyone anywhere in America before 1798” existed. This book, by contrast, concludes that a broad definition and understanding of freedoms of press and speech was the dominant context of the First Amendment and of Fox’s Libel Act. Its basis is hundreds of examples of a broad understanding of freedoms of press and speech, in both Britain and America, in the late eighteenth century. For example, a book published in London in 1760 by a Scottish lawyer, George Wallace, stated that it is tyranny “to restrain the freedom of speculative disquisitions,” and because “men have a right to think for themselves, and to publish their thoughts,” it is “monstrous … under the pretext of the authority of laws, which ought never to have been enacted … attempting to restrain the liberty of the press” (seditious libel law). This book also challenges the conventional view of Blackstone and the neo-Blackstonians. Blackstone and Mansfield did not find any definition in the common law, but instead selected the narrowest definition in popular essays from the prior seventy years. Blackstone misdescribed it as an accepted common law definition, which in fact did not exist, and a year later Mansfield inserted a similar definition into the common law for the first time. Both misdescribed that narrow definition and the unique rules for prosecuting sedition as ancient. They were leading a counter-revolution, cloaked as a summary of a narrow and ancient common law doctrine that was neither.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

8

Allan, Fels, and Business Law Education Centre (South Melbourne, Vic.), eds. Trade practices in 1992: Papers delivered at a BLEC workshop held in May 1992. South Melbourne, Vic., Australia: BLEC Books, 1992.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

9

Lucienne, Layton, and Business Law Education Centre (South Melbourne, Vic.), eds. Restrictive trade practices: Papers delivered at BLEC workshop held in May 1991. South Melbourne, Vic: BLEC Books, 1991.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

10

Authority, Police Complaints, ed. Safer restraint: Report of the conference held in April 2002 at Church House, Westminster. London: Police Complaints Authority, 2002.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

11

Mark, Dwor, Polsky Leonard H, and Barrigar Robert H, eds. Product distribution: Materials prepared for a Continuing Legal Education seminar held in Vancouver, B.C. on October 18, 1988. Vancouver, B.C: Continuing Legal Education Society of British Columbia, 1988.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

12

Palmer, R. R. The Limitations of Enlightened Despotism. Princeton University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.23943/princeton/9780691161280.003.0012.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

The forces of aristocracy, which in some countries in the 1780s prevailed over democratic movements, prevailed in others over monarchy itself. This chapter takes up a thread left hanging at the close of Chapter IV. It was shown there that, by the middle 1770s, or just before the American Revolution, the kings of France and of Sweden, and the Queen of Hungary and Bohemia, had asserted royal authority and put the constituted bodies of their several realms under restraint. The following fifteen years made clear the limits beyond which enlightened despotism could not go. However held down, the constituted bodies—estates, diets, parlements, and the like—had strong powers of survival and resurgence. This chapter deals mainly with the Hapsburg monarchy under Joseph II and Leopold II, with observations, since not everything can be told, on Prussia, Sweden, and Russia.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

13

Szmukler, George. Can we reduce the need for coercive interventions? Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/med/9780198801047.003.0010.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Sadly, little research has been devoted to developing interventions aimed at reducing the use of coercive measures. A large study in the United States showed that patient perceptions of coercion at admission to psychiatric hospitals are less if they believe their ‘voice’ has been heard, and they have been treated with respect, concern, and in good faith—termed ‘procedural justice’. However, trials of whether training staff in accord with these observations will reduce coercion have yet to be done. The most promising interventions to reduce involuntary admissions have been ‘joint crisis plans’. These offer opportunities for patients to state their treatment preferences in case of future crises, and plans are negotiated in joint meetings with the treatment team. Though randomized controlled trials are lacking, ‘before versus after’ comparisons have suggested a range of complex interventions that may reduce the use of coercive measures, such as restraint and seclusion, on inpatient units.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

14

Industrial/office development in areas of planning restraint: The London Green Belt : proceedings of a conference held at Kingston Polytechnic in April, 1986. Kingston: Kingston Polytechnic School of Geography in association with the Regional Studies Association S.E. Branch, 1986.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

15

Weiss, Shira. The Hardening of Pharaoh’s Heart. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780190684426.003.0004.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

Albo focuses his exegetical interpretation on his conception of free choice in a unique reading of the Exodus narrative. In the biblical description of the plagues that God brought upon the Egyptians, it is written that God “hardened Pharaoh’s heart” so that he would not agree to allow the Israelites to leave his land. The literal meaning of the narrative implies that God restrained Pharaoh’s free will. Such an interpretation calls God’s justice into question, since Pharaoh is held morally responsible for his refusal to liberate the Israelites. In an effort to reconcile the seeming conflict, Albo creatively interprets this enigmatic narrative, concluding that God did not deprive Pharaoh of his free choice, but rather preserved his volitional will, thereby maintaining divine justice. By hardening Pharaoh’s heart, God gave Pharaoh the fortitude to withstand the pressures of the plagues and exercise free choice whether or not to liberate the Israelites.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

16

Lenard, Thomas M., and Jeffrey A. Eisenach. Competition, Innovation and the Microsoft Monopoly : Antitrust in the Digital Marketplace: Proceedings of a Conference Held by the Progress and Freedom Foundation in Washington, DC February 5 1998. Springer London, Limited, 2012.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

17

Lenard, Thomas M., and Jeffrey A. Eisenach. Competition, Innovation and the Microsoft Monopoly : Antitrust in the Digital Marketplace: Proceedings of a Conference Held by the Progress and Freedom Foundation in Washington, DC February 5 1998. Springer Netherlands, 2012.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

18

Myles, O'Reilly, and University College Dublin. Irish Centre for Commercial Law Studies., eds. The Competition Act, restraint of trade and employee covenants: (papers presented at a conference held in the) University Industry Centre, U.C.D. Belfield, Thursday 7th October 1993. Dublin: Irish Centre for Commercial Law Studies, 1993.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

19

Paul, Torremans. Part III Jurisdiction, Foreign Judgments and Awards, 10 Jurisdiction of the English Courts—An Introduction. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199678983.003.0010.

Повний текст джерела

Анотація:

This chapter provides an overview of issues relating to the jurisdiction of the English courts. It begins with a discussion of jurisdiction under the Brussels/Lugano system, focusing on four different sets of rules: the rules contained in the Brussels I Regulation as amended in the Brussels I Recast, the EC/Denmark Agreement, the Brussels Convention, and the Lugano Convention. It then considers jurisdiction under the rules contained in a modified version of the Brussels I Regulation, as well as jurisdiction under the traditional English rules (whether the English courts have power to hear the case; whether the court will decline jurisdiction or stay the proceedings. or restrain foreign proceedings; and whether there is a limitation upon the exercise of jurisdiction). The chapter also examines jurisdiction under the rules in the Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements 2005, ratified by the European Union on behalf of all the Member States.

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

20

Ellingsworth, Christopher Allen. Search for the Truth about God and the Universe: Hast Thou Heard the Secret of God? and Dost Thou Restrain Wisdom to Thyself? AuthorHouse, 2013.

Знайти повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Ми пропонуємо знижки на всі преміум-плани для авторів, чиї праці увійшли до тематичних добірок літератури. Зв'яжіться з нами, щоб отримати унікальний промокод!