Увійти

Готові списки джерел за темами / New York Convention of 1958 / Статті в журналах

Статті в журналах з теми "New York Convention of 1958"

Щоб переглянути інші типи публікацій з цієї теми, перейдіть за посиланням: New York Convention of 1958.

Автор: Grafiati

Опубліковано: 19 липня 2022

Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями

Оберіть тип джерела:

Ознайомтеся з топ-50 статей у журналах для дослідження на тему "New York Convention of 1958".

Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.

Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.

Переглядайте статті в журналах для різних дисциплін та оформлюйте правильно вашу бібліографію.

1

Paulsson, Marike. "The 1958 New York Convention Article II: Fit for Modern International Trade?" BCDR International Arbitration Review 2, Issue 1 (June 1, 2015): 117–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/bcdr2015007.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Article II of the 1958 New York Convention contains a formal requirement that has brought UNCITRAL to issue recommendations on how to interpret the so-called "in writing" requirement. According to Article II(2), an agreement must be either signed by the parties or concluded through an exchange of telegrams. The Convention's success may falter if courts cannot find a way to relax the stringent requirement of Article II(2).Today, arbitration agreements are formally concluded differently, and they no longer respond to the idea of arbitration agreements in 1958. The author attempts to bring the 1958 treaty to the days of modern trade by revisiting the drafting history of Article II and bring the drafters' intent back to the surface. That enables the creation of guidelines for counsel to draft clauses that are "New York Convention-proof", and it enables the judiciary to realign the old treaty with modern trade.

2

Ay, Yunus Emre. "Recognition and Enforcement of Annulled Foreign Arbitral Awards in the Country of Origin under the 1958 New York Convention: the US and French Approaches." Teisė 120 (September 30, 2021): 147–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.15388/teise.2021.120.11.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

The recognition and enforcement of annulled foreign arbitral awards in the country of origin under the 1958 New York Convention is subject to doctrinal discussions. A relevant article of the1958 New York Convention become the subject matter of many cases in some large economies. These cases and doctrinal views are very important for other countries that did not host such a case before their national courts. Therefore, the purpose of this paper is to analyse the relevant article of the 1958 New York Convention and compare delocalization and territorial theories.

3

Nariman, Fali S. "Application of the New York Convention in India." Journal of International Arbitration 25, Issue 6 (December 1, 2008): 893–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/joia2008069.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Forty–five independent states were represented at the Conference of Plenipotentiaries held in New York in June 1958 to conclude the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards. India’s representative was elected as First Vice–President of the Conference. India was not only a party to the New York Convention but had been an active participant at the deliberations that led to the Convention. To give effect to the New York Convention (often described as “the most successful of all UN Conventions”) India’s Parliament enacted the Foreign Awards (Recognition and Enforcement) Act 1961; domestic arbitrations continued to be governed by the somewhat antiquated Indian Arbitration Act 1940. The 1961 Act, along with the 1940 Act, were later repealed and replaced by a new consolidated law applicable to both domestic and international arbitrations, the Arbitration and Conciliation Act 1996. This article examines how issues arising under statutory provisions implementing Article V of the New York Convention (Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Awards) have been dealt with by courts in India.

4

Khatchadourian, Minas. "The Application of the 1958 New York Convention in Qatar." BCDR International Arbitration Review 1, Issue 1 (September 1, 2014): 49–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/bcdr2014004.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

The New York Convention provides a uniform legal framework for the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in 150 Contracting States. Although the New York Convention has been criticized for some textual ambiguities and the lack of a clear common standard of 'public policy,' its application has been a real success in the field of arbitration for more than sixty years. As it became a signatory of the New York Convention in 2003, Qatar is obliged to recognize all forms of 'written arbitration agreements' and to enforce foreign arbitral awards according to its internal rules of procedure. In the last two years, the Qatari Supreme Court has decided surprisingly to use the 'national' standard of public policy to set aside a number of national and foreign arbitral awards based on the absence of a formal prologue at the opening of the award as required for the court's judgments. Finally, a recent judgment of the Court of Cassation declared that the requirement under Qatari Law that all decisions issued in Qatar be issued in the name of the Emir does not apply to an ICC award since the parties agreed in their contract that the arbitration would be governed by the ICC Rules and that Qatari Law applied to the merits of the dispute only.

5

Kravtsov, S. "THE APPEAL OF INTERNATIONAL COMMERCIAL ARBITRATION AWARDS AS A FORM OF JUDICAL CONTROL BY NATIONAL COURTS." Bulletin of Taras Shevchenko National University of Kyiv. Legal Studies, no. 110 (2019): 8–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.17721/1728-2195/2019/3.110-2.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

The appeal of the international commercial arbitration awards is a major issue in the dispute settlement mechanism for arbitration governed by multilateral conventions, bilateral treaties and national laws, as well as by the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards of 1958. Notwithstanding the importance of the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards of 1958, it restricts to a certain extent the scope of legal protection of arbitral awards, as it leaves national courts to challenge them by the way of possible annulment, and national courts when considering petitions for annulment decisions are vested in the power to revoke such decisions. In this respect, the resolution of these issues may raise the issue of the correlation between the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards 1958 and domestic legislation of the countries in which the relevant decision may be challenged. The specific of the international commercial arbitration decision is that it cannot be appealed to any higher court. However, the absence of any form of control over the arbitral award could lead to the enforcement of such decisions, which, if rendered within the judicial system, would be overturned or modified by a higher court. Therefore, there is an institution for challenging arbitral awards in national courts. Due to the fact that the arbitration award is a form of control by national courts, the regulation of this institution is defined in the legislation of each individual country, and at the international legal level only certain aspects are regulated. These are the European Convention of 1961 and the New York Convention of 1958.

6

van den Berg, A. J. "Consolidated arbitrations and the 1958 New York Arbitration Convention." Arbitration International 2, no. 4 (October 1, 1986): 367–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/arbitration/2.4.367.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

7

Geisinger, Elliott. "Implementing the New York Convention in Switzerland." Journal of International Arbitration 25, Issue 6 (December 1, 2008): 691–706. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/joia2008056.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

The 1958 New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards entered into force for Switzerland in 1965 and, since 1989, has been applicable to the recognition and enforcement in Switzerland of all foreign arbitral awards. After a brief description of the legislative environment in which the Convention operates, this article describes how the implementation of the Convention in Switzerland reflects the arbitration–friendly and pro–enforcement policies of Swiss international arbitration law, in particular with respect to Article V of the Convention. It will also seek to identify issues that leave room for improvement, be it in Swiss practice or for the revision of the Convention itself.

8

Van Den Berg, A. J. "The New York Convention 1958 and Panama Convention 1975: Redundancy or Compatibility?" Arbitration International 5, no. 3 (September 1, 1989): 214–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/arbitration/5.3.214.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

9

Tsakiri, Dimitra A. "Application of the New York Convention to the Enforcement of Arbitration Agreements." ASA Bulletin 36, Issue 2 (May 1, 2018): 364–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/asab2018031.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

The 1958 New York Convention is indeed one of the most important instruments in international arbitration, contemplating not only the enforcement of arbitral awards, but also the enforcement of arbitration agreements under Article II (3). One of the perceived shortcomings of the Convention is the fact that it does not define which types of arbitration agreements can be enforced under it. The article takes into account some national legislations and judicial interpretations on the matter and contemplates the ways of interpreting the Convention so as to fill this gap. In this regard, Article II (3) is interpreted in conformity with Article I, which defines the Convention's scope of application based on the seat of arbitration. Moreover, this article discusses briefly a recent attempt to address the aforementioned shortcoming through the introduction of a hypothetical draft convention which would modernize the New York Convention.

10

Van Den Berg, A. J. "Non-domestic arbitral awards under the 1958 New York Convention." Arbitration International 2, no. 3 (July 1, 1986): 191–219. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/arbitration/2.3.191.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

11

Marinho Nunes, Thiago. "A Convenção de Nova Iorque de 10 de Junho de 1958: Alguns Pontos Polêmicos." Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem 6, Issue 23 (September 1, 2009): 33–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/rba2009040.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

ABSTRACT: This paper aims at analyzing the New York Convention of June 10, 1958 on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards with an overview on its effects in Brazilian law, mostly regarding the supremacy of the New York Convention vis-à-vis the Brazilian legislation and its effects regarding the fundamentals principles of international arbitration.

12

Castellanos Ruiz, María José. "Exequatur de laudos arbitrales extranjeros en España: comentario al auto del TSJ de Murcia de 12 de abril de 2019 = Exequatur of foreign arbitral awards in Spain: commentary to the decision of the High Court of Justice of Murcia of 12th April 2019." CUADERNOS DE DERECHO TRANSNACIONAL 12, no. 1 (March 5, 2020): 512. http://dx.doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2020.5200.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Resumen: En el Auto del TSJ de Murcia de 12 de abril de 2019 se acuerda conceder al exequatur en España de un laudo arbitral dictado en Colombia, solicitado por la parte demandante Productos Florida, S.A. Los motivos de denegación del exequatur que son alegados por la parte demandada, AMC JUICES, S.L y que son objeto de análisis son: a) Sentencia arbitral no obligatoria para las partes o que ha sido anulada o suspendida por una autoridad competente del país en que, o conforme a cuya Ley, ha sido dictada esa sentencia (art. V.1.e) Convenio de Nueva York de 1958); b) Reconocimiento o ejecución del laudo arbitral contrarios al orden público del Estado requerido (art. V.2.b) Convenio de Nueva York de 1958). En definitiva, la postura de los tribunales españoles en relación con el Convenio de Nueva York de 10 de junio de 1958 sobre el reconocimiento y ejecución de las sentencias arbitrales extranjeras, es la de favorecer el reconocimiento y ejecución de laudos arbitrales, de manera que sólo rechazan el exequatur de un laudo arbitral por motivos muy claros y evidentes.Palabras clave: laudos arbitrales extranjeros, convenios arbitrales, reconocimiento y ejecución, exequatur, Convenio de Nueva York de 1958, Ley española de Arbitraje de 2003. Abstract: In decision of the High Court of Murcia of 12th April 2019, it is agreed the exequatur in Spain of an foreign arbitral award issued in Colombia, requested by the plaintiff Productos Florida, S.A. The grounds for refusal of the exequatur that are alleged by the defendant, AMC JUICES, S.L. and that are subject to analysis are: a) The award has not yet become binding on the parties, or has been set aside or suspended by a competent authority of the country in which, or under the law of which, that award was made. (art. V.1.e) New York Convention of 1958); b) Recognition or enforcement of the foreign arbitral awards would be contrary to its public policy (art. V.2.b) New York Convention of 1958). In short, the position of the Spanish courts in relation to The New York Convention of June 10, 1958 on the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards, is to favor the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards, so that only they reject the exequatur of an arbitral award for very clear and obvious reasons. Keywords: foreign arbitral awards, arbitral clauses, recognition and enforcement, exequatur, New York Convention of 10 june 1958, Spanish arbitration law of 2003.

13

Van Den Berg, Albert Jan. "Enforcement of Arbitral Awards Annulled in Russia Case Comment on Dutch Supreme Court of 25 June 2010." Journal of International Arbitration 28, Issue 6 (December 1, 2011): 617–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/joia2011047.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

By a decision dated 28 April 2009, the Court of Appeal in Amsterdam granted enforcement of four arbitral awards annulled by the Russian courts under the New York Convention of 1958. The Dutch Supreme Court declared the recourse against the Court of Appeal decision inadmissible. The Supreme Court on 25 June 2010 opined that such a recourse would violate Article III of the New York Convention since it would impose a more onerous condition on the enforcement of Convention awards than on domestic (Dutch) awards. In the author's opinion, the Supreme Court's reasoning is at odds with both the New York Convention and Dutch arbitration law.

14

Van Den Berg, Albert Jan. "Enforcement of Arbitral Awards Annulled in Russia: Case Comment on Dutch Supreme Court of 25 June 2010." Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem 8, Issue 30 (April 1, 2011): 38–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/rba2011019.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

ABSTRACT: By a decision dated 28 April 2009, the Court of Appeal in Amsterdam granted enforcement of four arbitral awards annulled by the Russian courts under the New York Convention of 1958. The Dutch Supreme Court declared the recourse against the Court of Appeal decision inadmissible. The Supreme Court on 25 June 2010 opined that such a recourse would violate Article III of the New York Convention since it would impose a more onerous condition on the enforcement of Convention awards than on domestic (Dutch) awards. In the author's opinion, the Supreme Court's reasoning is at odds with both the New York Convention and Dutch arbitration law.

15

Kruger, Thalia. "I. The 20th Session Of The Hague Conference: A New Choice Of Court Convention And The Issue Of Ec Memebership." International and Comparative Law Quarterly 55, no. 2 (April 2006): 447–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/iclq/lei092.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

On 30 June 2005 a Convention to respect choice of court agreements was finally born. The Hague Convention on Choice of Court Agreements aspires to be parallel to the New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (1958) (‘New York Convention’). The exception is that if an equally broadly accepted convention exists with respect to choice of court agreements,1 business parties will have an alternative to choosing arbitration in their contracts. If they have the assurance that a judgement will be recognized and enforced in a large number of States, some might be more inclined to insert a choice of court clause instead of an arbitration clause. This assumption has been confirmed by ICC research.2

16

González de Cossío, Francisco. "The 1958 New York Convention in Action, by Marike R. P. Paulsson." Arbitration International 32, no. 3 (July 6, 2016): 541–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/arbint/aiw022.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

17

Deshpande, J. V. S. "Jurisdiction Over 'Foreign' and 'Domestic' Awards in the New York Convention, 1958." Arbitration International 7, no. 2 (June 1, 1991): 123–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/arbitration/7.2.123.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

18

Van Den Berg, Albert Jan. "Enforcement of Arbitral Awards Annulled in Russia – Case Comment on Court of Appeal of Amsterdam, April 28, 2009." Journal of International Arbitration 27, Issue 2 (April 1, 2010): 179–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/joia2010010.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

By a decision dated April 28, 2009, the Court of Appeal in Amsterdam granted enforcement of four arbitral awards annulled by the Russian courts under the New York Convention of 1958. The Court of Appeal’s principal reason was: “[S]ince it is very likely that the judgments by the Russian civil judge setting aside the arbitration decisions are the result of a dispensing of justice that must be qualified as partial and dependent, said judgments cannot be recognized in the Netherlands. This means that in considering the application by Yukos Capital for enforcement of the arbitration decisions, the setting aside of that decision [sic] by the Russian court must be disregarded.” In the author’s opinion, the Court of Appeal’s reasoning is at odds with the New York Convention of 1958.

19

Lawry-White, Merryl. "The (Non)-Application of the New York Convention by the Qatari Courts: ITIIC v. Dyncorp." Journal of International Arbitration 29, Issue 4 (August 1, 2012): 429–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/joia2012028.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

In 2003, Qatar ratified the 1958 Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (the New York Convention). However, like a number of other Middle Eastern countries, Qatar did not amend its arbitration law to take account of its accession to the Convention. The resultant divergence is likely to create confusion for litigants and judges alike as demonstrated by the case of ITIIC v. Dyncorp, where the annulment of a foreign award by the Qatari courts notwithstanding the force of the Convention created a carousel of cases to be commenced in three jurisdictions over the course of five years.

20

Perrini, Marco, and Piero Bernardini. "New York Convention of June 10, 1958: the Application of Article V by the Courts in Italy." Journal of International Arbitration 25, Issue 6 (December 1, 2008): 707–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/joia2008057.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

This article examines the Italian procedural rules implementing the New York Convention by reference to specific proceedings for recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in Italy. In providing an overview of the relevant jurisprudence, this article makes reference to judgments of the Italian Supreme Court, which hears the I.C. Appeal of parties dissatisfied with decisions of the competent Court of Appeal granting or refusing recognition and enforcement of an award on any of the grounds set out in Article V(1) and Article V(2) of the New York Convention.

21

Badah, Saad Aljadean. "Capacity of Parties and Arbitration Agreement. Part I." Asian International Arbitration Journal 14, Issue 2 (December 1, 2018): 193–213. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/aiaj2018011.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

The Gulf Cooperation Council (‘GCC’) is a political and economic alliance of six states namely Saudi Arabia, Kuwait, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar, Bahrain and Oman. They share similar political and cultural identities rooted in the creed of Islam (See: http://www.gcc-sg.org/en-us/AboutGCC/Pages/StartingPointsAndGoals. aspx). They are all parties to the New York Convention 1958. This article seeks to examine the concept of capacity under the laws of the GCC states and how it impacts the enforcement of the agreement to arbitrate under the New York Convention when interposed with the Civil Codes of the GCC states.

22

Hovaguimian, Philippe. "The Res Judicata Effects of Foreign Judgments in Post-Award Proceedings: To Bind or Not to Bind?" Journal of International Arbitration 34, Issue 1 (February 1, 2017): 79–106. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/joia2017005.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

This comparative analysis explores the question of preclusive effects arising from arbitration related judgments, particularly when a foreign court has already ruled upon an issue relevant to the grounds for refusal under Article V of the 1958 New York Convention. It argues that arbitration-related judgments like exequatur or non-annulment decisions, along with the res judicata and estoppel effects arising from them, can be subject to recognition in other countries. The article thereby rejects some of the views contending that various legal obstacles stand in the way of such recognition, including its compatibility with the 1958 New York Convention. However, risks of forum shopping and undue imbalances in the parties’ rights ultimately support restricting this recognition to judgments rendered at the arbitral seat only. Such judgments should be able to preclude the re-litigation of identical issues in non-seat countries as a matter of res judicata and estoppel.

23

Hanotiau, Bernard. "Arbitrability, Due Process, and Public Policy Under Article V of the New York Convention Belgian and French Perspectives." Journal of International Arbitration 25, Issue 6 (December 1, 2008): 721–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/joia2008058.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

The free circulation of awards is ensured by the 10 June 1958 New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards. Even though freedom is the essence of arbitration, limits exist. The purpose of this article is to analyse the way France and Belgium deal with the limits related to arbitrability, due process and public policy in the light of Article V of the New York Convention, which lists a series of situations where recognition and enforcement of an award may be refused at the request of the party against whom it is invoked, or by the court on its own motion.

24

Lumbantobing, John. "The 1958 New York Convention in Indonesia: History and Commentaries Beyond Monism-Dualism." Indonesia Law Review 9, no. 3 (December 31, 2019): 222. http://dx.doi.org/10.15742/ilrev.v9n3.583.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

25

Petrochilos, Georgios C. "Enforcing Awards Annulled in their State of Origin under the New York Convention." International and Comparative Law Quarterly 48, no. 4 (October 1999): 856–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0020589300063715.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

An impressive corpus of legal literature has accumulated in the last few years on the question whether it is possible or desirable to have an arbitral award enforced under the 1958 New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards1despite the award's having been annulled in the State where it was made. The issue is important not only in the context of the New York Convention, which itself is the most widely used vehicle of recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards,2but also in the context of other international documents3or national law provisions modelled on the Convention4and bilateral treaties that incorporate it by reference.5The debate has largely centred on two well-known cases,HilmartonandChromalloy. It is the purpose of this article to analyse those cases and other relevant case law and offer a comprehensive analysis of the relevance of judicial decisions of the State of origin for purposes of enforcement under the New York Convention. In doing so this article proposes to discuss both the technical aspects of the relevant provisions of the Convention, and in particular their interrelationship, and the issues of legal policy that arise. Though the discussion will touch upon the wider doctrinal question of the degree of independence of arbitral proceedings from the law of the arbitralsitus.

26

Betancourt, Julio César. "State Liability for Breach of Article II.3 of the 1958 New York Convention." Arbitration International 33, no. 2 (May 29, 2017): 203–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/arbint/aix004.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

27

Kofi Annan, H. E. "The 1958 New York Convention as a Model for Subsequent Legislative Texts on Arbitration." Arbitration International 15, no. 3 (September 1, 1999): 319–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/arbitration/15.3.319.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

28

Daradkeh, Lafi. "Constitutionality of Article VII of the New York Convention of 1958 under Egyptian and Jordanian Law." Arab Law Quarterly 32, no. 4 (November 9, 2018): 501–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15730255-12323064.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Abstract This article examines the constitutionality of Article VII of the 1958 New York Convention (NY Convention) under Egyptian and Jordanian law. Under Article VII, which provides for the application of the more-favourable-right provision, the winning party in an arbitration can rely on any regime provided by the local legal system to recognize and enforce the arbitral award. In doing so, the winning party can bypass provisions under which the losing party can resist enforcement. This article examines whether Article VII constitutionally provides modes of enforcement by which the winning party can enforce a legal arbitral award as well as providing grounds of refusal by which the losing party can resist enforcement of illegal awards. As such, this article examines the constitutionality of Article VII, and asks whether it balances the interests of the winning party and the losing party under constitutional law in Egypt and Jordan.

29

Tuegeh-Longdong, Tineke. "Peranan Ketentuan More Favourable Right Pasal VII ayat I dalam Pelaksanaan Konvensi NY 1958." Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 30, no. 4 (August 29, 2000): 355. http://dx.doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol30.no4.321.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Konvensi New York 1958, Pasal I (I) memberikan suatu lingkup wilayah yang luas bagi apa yang diartikan dengan suatu putusan arbitrase asing (luar negeri). Karena yang menjadi patokan hanya bahwa putusan arbitrase asing tersebut diputuskan tidak dalam wilayah dimana pelaksanaannya diminta. Tidak ada syarat lain yang diperlukan sesuai dengan "principle of universality ", tendensi modem dalam "internatiollal Conventions ", yang berusaha untuk melaksanakan sebanyak mungkin putusan arbilrase asing, sehingga adalah dalam rangka ini Konvensi New York 1958, untuk selanjutnya disebut KNY 1958, memperlakukan ketentuan "more favourable right" sebagaimana diaturdalam Pasal VII (I) KNYork 1958.

30

Badah, Saad. "THE ENFORCEMENT OF FOREIGN ARBITRAL AWARDS IN KUWAIT." Agora International Journal of Juridical Sciences 8, no. 2 (June 24, 2014): 9–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.15837/aijjs.v8i2.1185.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

This article is an analysis of the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards in Kuwait, an Islamicnation governed by Sharia law. The need for this analysis stems from the potential conflictbetween the Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards (1958)(the ‘New York Convention’)(which came into effect in Kuwait on 27 July 1978)and Sharia lawand the need to merge the two into a cohesive legal system.The Gulf Cooperation Council (GCC)has a representative office in Kuwait that facilitates the applicable provisions contained therein.

31

Gautama, Sudargo. "PELAKSANAAN KEPUTUSAN ARBITRASE LUAR NEGERI DI DALAM WILAYAH REPUBLIK INDONESIA." Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan 15, no. 2 (June 9, 2017): 111. http://dx.doi.org/10.21143/jhp.vol15.no2.1113.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Setelah adanya Keputusan Presiden Republik Indonesia tanggal 5 Agustus 1981 Nomor 34, sesungguhnya Keputusan-keputusan Arbitrase Luar Negeri dapat dilaksanakan di dalam wilayah Indonesia. Bukankah dengan Keppres No. 34 tahun 1981 ini telah disahkan Konvensi PBB tentang Pengakuan dan Pelaksanaan Keputusan-keputusan Arbitrase Luar Negeri (Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Abitral Awards)? Konvensi ini telah ditandatangani di New York pada tanggal 10 Juni 1958 dan telah mulai berlaku untuk negara-negara yang telah menandatangani pada 7 Juni 1959. Negara kita baru turut serta pada Konvensi ini secara Accession mulai tanggal 5 Agustus 1981, yaitu dengan Keppres No. 34 tahun 1981, Lembaran Negara RI tahun 1981 No. 40, yang telah di beritahukan dengan surat Presiden Soeharto tanggal 5 Agustus 1981 No. R.7/Prd./PU/PU/XIII/1981 kepada Pimpinan Dewan Perwakilan Rakyat Republik Indonesia. Menurut Pasal 3 daripada New York Convention tahun 1958 yang telah dinyatakan berlaku dengan Keppres 1981 No. 34 maka tiap negara peserta dari Konvensi ini akan mengakui keputusan arbitrase luar negeri dan menganggapnya sebagai mengikat serta melaksanakan keputusan arbitrase itu sesuai dengan ketentuan-ketentuan Hukum Acara yang berlaku di dalam wilayah di mana keputusan itu diminta untuk dilaksanakan.

32

Kunz, Catherine Anne. "Enforcement of Arbitral Awards under the New York Convention in Switzerland An overview of the current practice and case law of the Swiss Supreme Court." ASA Bulletin 34, Issue 4 (December 1, 2016): 836–65. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/asab2016074.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

This article presents an overview of the current practice and case law of the Swiss Supreme Court in relation to the implementation of the 1958 New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards. More specifically, this article examines the decisions rendered by the Swiss Supreme Court over the period 2000-2016. Decisions are discussed in relation to the relevant provision of the Convention on an article-by-article basis. For each provision of the Convention, a short commentary is included highlighting the relevant requirements and thresholds that need to be met in light of the recent case law of the Swiss Supreme Court in order for a party to obtain or to successfully resist the recognition and enforcement of a foreign award in Switzerland. The decisions of the Swiss Supreme Court rendered during the period under review are of particular interest as the Supreme Court has examined several Convention provisions for the first time, whilst confirming, clarifying and even overturning its earlier case law. These decisions confirm that Swiss courts continue to take a liberal, pragmatic and pro-enforcement approach to the New York Convention in practice.

33

Chapdelaine, P. "The Temporal Application of the New York Arbitration Convention of 1958: Retroactivity or Immediate Application?" Arbitration International 8, no. 1 (March 1, 1992): 73–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/arbitration/8.1.73.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

34

Rajput, Aniruddha. "Reinmar Wolf: New York convention. Convention on the recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards of 10 June 1958. Commentary." Indian Journal of International Law 55, no. 2 (May 2015): 297–98. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s40901-015-0017-9.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

35

Anezi, Rashid Hamad Al. "Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards in Kuwait." BCDR International Arbitration Review 1, Issue 1 (September 1, 2014): 85–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/bcdr2014007.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Arbitration is a judicial act of a special nature wherein the arbitrator obtains his authority from the agreement of the parties. The benefits of such an alternative means of dispute settlement usually include cost savings, increased efficiency compared to court hearings, more control over the proceedings, and some degree of confidentiality with respect to pleadings and the award. Arbitration, whether local or foreign, is regulated in Kuwait by the Civil and Commercial Pleadings Law No. 38 of 1980. Under the Pleadings Law and the 1958 New York Convention, to which Kuwait is a party, a foreign arbitral award is enforced in Kuwait provided that certain conditions are met.The Pleadings Law follows an 'observation' approach rather than a 'revision' approach, which means that a Kuwaiti judge will not act like an appeals court judge but rather as an 'observer of conformity' of the award with Kuwaiti law and the New York Convention.

36

Steindl, Barbara. "Watch Out and Act! Recent Case Law on Due Process in Light of Austrian Law and the 1958 New York Convention." Journal of International Arbitration 25, Issue 4 (August 1, 2008): 513–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/joia2008039.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Two months after the fiftieth anniversary of the New York Convention, the concept of due process is more in vogue than ever. Arbitral tribunals (sometimes at the request of the parties) restrict the proceedings on a strict time and cost management basis. However, in formulating the procedural timetable, both the tribunal and the parties should have regard to the ultimate aim of the proceedings. This article reports on recent case law of the Austrian Supreme Court dealing with elements of due process that arose in enforcement proceedings under the New York Convention as well as in setting aside proceedings concerning foreign arbitral awards in the Austrian courts and illustrates comparisons with the jurisprudence of other national courts. The article discusses the main features of due process under the 1895 Civil Procedure Code and contrasts it with the 2006 Civil Procedure Code, highlighting that case law rendered under the 1895 Civil Procedure Code still remains relevant.

37

Farsia, Lena, and Rafika Taufik. "Penerapan Asas Ketertiban Umum terhadap Putusan Arbitrase Asing di Indonesia." Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum 20, no. 3 (December 13, 2018): 439–56. http://dx.doi.org/10.24815/kanun.v20i3.11374.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Penelitian ini ingin menjawab interpretasi dan pelaksanaan asas ketertiban umum terhadap putusan arbitrase asing di pengadilan Indonesia. Dengan berbasis pada penelitian hukum, penelitian diharapkan akan menjawab pengakuan dan pelaksanaan keputusan arbritase asing tersebut. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengecualian terhadap ketertiban umum ditemukan dalam Pasal V Paragraph 2 angka (b) Konvensi New York 1958 tentang Pengakuan dan Pelaksanaan Keputusan Arbitrase Asing. Konvensi menentukan bahwa pengakuan dan pelaksanaan putusan arbitrase dapat ditolak apabila kemudian ditemukan pengakuan dan pelaksanaan putusan tersebut melanggar ketentuan ketertiban umum di negara yang bersangkutan. Namun demikian, Konvensi tidak memberikan pengertian secara jelas tentang ketertiban umum, hal ini diserahkan kepada masing-masing negara peserta konvensi. Berdasarkan putusan pengadilan, konsep ketertiban umum yang diterapkan di Indonesia diinterpretasi secara luas dan domestik. The Implementation of Public Order Principle on Foreign Arbitral Awards in Indonesia This study aims to answer the interpretation and implementation of public order principle on foreign arbitral awards in Indonesian courts. Based on legal research, it is expected to answer the recognition and implementation of foreign arbitral awards. The results show that the exception to public order is found in Article V Paragraph 2 Number (b) of the 1958 New York Convention concerning the Recognition and Implementation of Foreign Arbitral Awards. The Convention stipulates that the recognition and implementation of an arbitral award can be rejected if later found that the recognition and implementation of the award violates the provisions of public order in the concerned country. However, the Convention does not provide a clear conception of public order, this is submitted to the respective countries participating in the convention. Based on a court decisions, the concept of public order applied in Indonesia was interpreted widely and domestically.

38

Trooboff, Peter D., and David J. Bederman. "Jurisdiction—1958 New York Convention—enforcement of award by Iran-U.S. Claims Tribunal in United States courts." American Journal of International Law 84, no. 2 (April 1990): 556–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/2203472.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

39

Mayer, Ulrich C. "The Enforcement of Annulled Arbitral Awards: Towards a Uniform Judicial Interpretation of the 1958 New York Convention." Uniform Law Review 3, no. 2-3 (April 1, 1998): 583–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ulr/3.2-3.583.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

40

Ziade, N. G. "Selective Bibliography on the 1958 New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards." ICSID Review 4, no. 2 (September 1, 1989): 434–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/icsidreview/4.2.434.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

41

Ibrahim, Rashid Abdulrahman. "Enforcement of Arbitral Awards in the Kingdom of Bahrain." BCDR International Arbitration Review 1, Issue 1 (September 1, 2014): 1011–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/bcdr2014017.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

This article discusses the enforcement of local and foreign arbitral awards in the courts of the Kingdom of Bahrain. The article explains the procedures required to give executory force to local arbitral awards according to the Bahraini Civil and Commercial Procedures Law. It also describes enforcement of awards under the Arbitration Procedural Rules of the GCC Commercial Arbitration Centre and the Bahrain Chamber for Dispute Resolution. As to the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards, the article outlines the standards and procedures for recognition and enforcement according to the New York Convention of 1958.

42

Eiselen, Sieg. "The Adoption of UNCITRAL Instruments to Fast Track Regional Integration of Commercial Law." Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem 12, Issue 46 (May 1, 2015): 82–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/rba2015025.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

ABSTRACT: The United Nations Commission for International Trade Law (UNCITRAL) has adopted and is promoting a number of texts for the harmonization of international trade law such as the 1980 Vienna Convention for the International Sale of Goods (CISG), the 1958 New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards and the 1974 New York Convention on the Limitation Period in the International Sale of Goods. There are also newer instruments which have not yet gained such wide acceptance that may be considered for adoption such as the 2005 UN Convention on the Use of Electronic Communications in International Contracts, the 1996 UNCITRAL Model Law on Electronic Commerce and the 1997 UNCITRAL Model Law on Cross-Border Insolvency. This paper will identify and discuss the UNCITRAL texts that may be most useful to fast track the regional harmonization and integration of commercial law. The paper will discuss the experience with these instruments internationally, more specifically the experience with the CISG and the Model Law on Electronic Commerce. The paper will critically examine the value of such harmonizing instruments. The paper will also outline critical success factors for regional legal harmonization and integration based on the experience with the UNCITRAL documents. Finally it will be argued that a number of these instruments are suitable for adoption in countries in order to facilitate regional integration.

43

Martinez-Fraga, Pedro J. "On The 50th Anniversary of the New York Convention, Revisiting Annulment and Vacatur Through the Prism of In Re: Chromalloy, Baker Marine, and TermoRio." Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem 5, Issue 18 (May 1, 2008): 91–113. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/rba2008031.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

ABSTRACT: Within the framework of what the author calls the need for "juridic or jurisprudential globalization" as a necessary counterpart to economic globalization, the article explores the tension between the permissive wording of the Convention's Article V (1)(e) asserting that recognition and enforcement of an arbitral award may be refused pursuant to subsection (1)(e) of Article V, and the mandatory stricture enunciated in the very Convention's Article VII (1) providing that parties shall not be divested or any right that they may have to avail themselves of the benefits of an arbitral award rendered in conformance with the laws or treaties of the country where such award is sought to be relied upon. This analysis is undertaken by tracing the contours of the three seminal cases addressing this issue, which culminate with the pronouncement by the Court of Appeals of the District of Columbia's decision, entered scarcely one year before the fiftieth anniversary of the New York Convention of 1958, in the case styled TermoRios S.A. E.S.P. v. Electranta S.P., 487 F.3d 928 (C.A.D.C., 2007). Contrary to the more conventional exegeses interpreting this authority, the author concludes that analytically the Second Circuit Court of Appeals and the District of Columbia Court of Appeals are not conceptually at odds and have found the very embryonic paradigm in TermoRios that may lead to a reconciliation of the permissive and mandatory strictures of the Convention with respect to the recognition, confirmation, and enforcement of judgments.

44

Huala Adolf. "The Provisions on the Enforcement of Foreign Arbitration Awards in Indonesia (under the New York Convention of 1958?)." JOURNAL OF ARBITRATION STUDIES 27, no. 3 (September 2017): 33–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.16998/jas.2017.27.3.33.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

45

Anisi, Elham, and Mehrab Darabpour. "Granting Enforcement to the FIDIC Dispute Adjudication Board’s Decision by the Amendment of the New York Convention 1958." Journal of Legal Affairs and Dispute Resolution in Engineering and Construction 13, no. 2 (May 2021): 06521001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1061/(asce)la.1943-4170.0000465.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

46

Barnashov, Alexey, and Patricia Nacimiento. "Recognition and Enforcement of Arbitral Awards in Russia." Journal of International Arbitration 27, Issue 3 (June 1, 2010): 295–306. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/joia2010016.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Recognition and enforcement are crucial elements of arbitration. Without the possibility for the winning party to enforce the arbitral award in its desired country, the whole arbitration was pointless. However, the enforcement proceedings are the only way for state courts to take influence on the outcome of the arbitral trial. Thus, even though uniform recognition and enforcement of foreign arbitral awards is the main goal of the almost worldwide applicable New York Convention of 1958, the interpretation of the provisions of this Convention is still up to national courts. While for example judges in Germany strictly stick to the rules set up by the Convention, courts in Russia tend to stress the meaning of these provisions. The following article is meant to point out difficulties in enforcing arbitral awards in Russia, as there is no predictable jurisdiction yet, when it comes to the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards. The article specifically will focus on the broad application of the public policy rule by Russian state courts.

47

Abdul Rahman, Abdullah. "Islamic finance arbitration: enforceability under the New York Convention 1958 of arbitration awards made following a reference to the Shariah Advisory Council under the Central Bank of Malaysia Act 2009." Arbitration International 35, no. 2 (June 1, 2019): 245–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/arbint/aiz009.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Abstract This article analyses the enforceability of arbitration awards, rendered following a reference to the Shariah Advisory Council of the Central Bank of Malaysia under sections 56 and 57 of the Central Bank of Malaysia Act 2009, under the New York Convention 1958 which has been adopted in 159 countries. This article employs the theoretical legal research method and has compared sections 56 and 57 against the requirements of the Convention for enforceability of awards, in particular the fundamental attributes of an arbitration. The conclusion is that such awards would not be enforceable under the Convention as they infringe Article V(1)(d) of the Convention. This would cause such awards to lose the feature of global and convenient enforceability usually attached to arbitration awards. These consequences make it less attractive, where there is an arbitration clause in the Islamic financial transaction documentation, to choose the Malaysian law as the governing law whether with regard to the substantive merits or the arbitration proceedings. This article recommends that amendments be made to sections 56 and 57 to make the reference to the Shariah Advisory Council optional rather than mandatory and its ruling advisory instead of binding, in respect of arbitration only, so that the global enforceability of such arbitration awards under the Convention is not undermined.

48

Shahry, Said Bin Saad Al. "Enforcement of Arbitral Awards in the Sultanate of Oman." BCDR International Arbitration Review 1, Issue 1 (September 1, 2014): 1039–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/bcdr2014020.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

This article examines the legal and judicial systems of the Sultanate of Oman and how they relate to structural and procedural aspects of arbitration within the country. The article identifies regulations and procedures affecting the status of arbitration under Omani law since the promulgation of Sultani Decree 47/97 on the Law of Arbitration in Civil and Commercial Disputes. The article also describes the role of the Commercial Dispute Resolution Tribunal established in accordance with Sultani Decree 79/81 and how Omani legislation regulates the enforcement of foreign arbitral awards under the 1958 New York Convention on the Recognition and Enforcement of Foreign Arbitral Awards to which Oman acceded in 1999.

49

Hill, Jonathan. "The Exercise of Judicial Discretion in Relation to Applications to Enforce Arbitral Awards under the New York Convention 1958." Oxford Journal of Legal Studies 36, no. 2 (September 27, 2015): 304–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/ojls/gqv025.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

50

Schulz, Alexandre Buono. "A Ordem Pública na Convenção de Nova Iorque sobre Reconhecimento e a Execução de Sentenças Arbitrais Estrangeiras." Revista Brasileira de Arbitragem 10, Issue 38 (June 1, 2013): 65–95. http://dx.doi.org/10.54648/rba2013029.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

ABSTRACT: The 1958 New York Convention authorizes the courts to refuse recognition and enforcement of foreign and "non-domestic" arbitral awards in case of violation of the public policy of that country. However, there being at least five identifiable levels of public policy (domestic, international, regional, transnational and truly international), the Convention does not specify which one(s) should be considered by the State court. This articles suggests that only the truly international, regional and the relevant country's international public policy be considered by the State court. The refusal, based on public policy, albeit very frequently raised by the parties, is and shall be accepted only on an extraordinary basis. Nevertheless, should such intervention be appropriate and necessary, it has to be effective and broad. It means that both merits and facts have to be subject to control, as a result of state courts' duties towards the society.