Щоб переглянути інші типи публікацій з цієї теми, перейдіть за посиланням: Participatory action research methodology.
Статті в журналах з теми "Participatory action research methodology"
Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями
Ознайомтеся з топ-50 статей у журналах для дослідження на тему "Participatory action research methodology".
Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.
Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.
Переглядайте статті в журналах для різних дисциплін та оформлюйте правильно вашу бібліографію.
1
Froggatt, Katherine, and Jo Hockley. "Action research in palliative care: Defining an evaluation methodology." Palliative Medicine 25, no. 8 (August 24, 2011): 782–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0269216311420483.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Background: Action research is beginning to be utilized within palliative care research to address questions concerned with practice and organizational change. An understanding of appropriate evaluation practices is required in order to ensure that high-quality action research is conducted. Aim: The aim of this paper is to present an account of participatory action research and illustrate the way in which evaluation approaches are integrated within this methodology. Design: Participatory action research will be described identifying its origins, principles and its relationship with evaluation frameworks. The key features of the evaluation process in regard to participatory research are outlined. Setting: Two studies are presented which illustrate the integration of evaluation within a participatory action research framework. The first approach uses a before–after summative evaluation approach in a study undertaken to develop palliative care practice within a UK nursing home context. The evaluation focused upon the impact of the intervention. The second study utilized similar methods and addressed the process of the action research using the Äldreväst Sjuhärad (ÄVS) model to evaluate participation in a peer education programme for advance care planning amongst older adults. Results: These examples of evaluation within action research illustrate how diverse methods can be used. The use of a specific participatory evaluation model ensures the process reflects the underlying participatory principle of action research. Conclusions: Evaluation processes are integral to action research approaches. The specific evaluative methods adopted will reflect the nature and focus of the evaluation being undertaken.
2
Gibson, Nancy. "Participatory action research approaches and methods." Gateways: International Journal of Community Research and Engagement 3 (November 25, 2010): 185–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.5130/ijcre.v3i0.1039.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
This book, published as part of Routledge’s Studies in Human Geography, is useful well beyond this discipline, as it provides a welcome review of Participatory Action Research (PAR). In three major sections, beginning and ending with ‘Reflections’ that bracket the ‘Action’ section, this collection provides a timely overview of the current status of this methodology, as well as many useful examples of applying PAR as a research process.
3
Mackenzie, John, Poh-Ling Tan, Suzanne Hoverman, and Claudia Baldwin. "The value and limitations of Participatory Action Research methodology." Journal of Hydrology 474 (December 2012): 11–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhydrol.2012.09.008.
Повний текст джерела
4
Robertson, Francesca, Jason Barrow, Magdalena Wajrak, Noel Nannup, Caroline Bishop, and Alison Nannup. "Participatory action and dual lens research." Qualitative Research Journal 17, no. 4 (November 13, 2017): 283–93. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/qrj-12-2016-0075.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore the idea that, in the last few decades, collaborative inquiry methods have evolved along a similar trajectory to dual lens research. Dual lens research, known in various contexts as both ways, two-eyed seeing Old Ways New Ways, and Koodjal Jinnung (looking both ways), is designed to generate new knowledge by exploring a theme through Aboriginal and contemporary western lenses. Participatory action research and a dual lens approach are considered in a number of projects with a particular focus on the issues such work can raise including conceptual challenges posed by fundamental differences between knowledge sets. Design/methodology/approach The authors hypothesize that a dual lens approach will become a branch of participatory action research, as such, a robust description needs to be developed and its ethical implications are considered. Existing work in this direction, including principles and processes, are collated and discussed. Findings Dual lens research as a branch of participatory action research is of great significance in countries with Aboriginal populations that are undergoing a cultural renaissance. As dual lens practitioners, the authors are finding their research outputs have a high positive impact on both Aboriginal and non-Aboriginal populations and make a genuine contribution to reconciliation by finding ways of going forward together. Originality/value This paper joins a growing body of research that supports resonances between Aboriginal and “western” research methods.
5
Bennett, Marlyn. "A Review of the Literature on the Benefits and Drawbacks of Participatory Action Research1." First Peoples Child & Family Review 14, no. 1 (August 31, 2020): 109–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/1071290ar.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
This paper reviews Participatory Action Research as a methodology. It maps the origins of Participatory Action Research and discusses the benefits and challenges that have been identified by other researchers in utilizing Participatory Action Research approaches in conducting research.
6
Livingston, Wulf, and Andrew Perkins. "Participatory action research (PAR) research: critical methodological considerations." Drugs and Alcohol Today 18, no. 1 (March 5, 2018): 61–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/dat-08-2017-0035.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore a range of key deliberations with regards to adopting participatory action research (PAR) and privileged access interviewer (PAI) approaches and methodologies within research on substance use. Design/methodology/approach This paper is a reflective piece; it adopts a mixture of applied practice and theory considerations. These conceptualisations capture what are still relatively early understandings and uses of such methodologies, acquired across several decades of research and service provision experiences. The paper is structured around some of the sequences of the research process and as such provides a broad framework for such approaches. Findings PAR and PAI approaches utilise several key theoretical considerations. There are many critical issues associated with adopting these approaches, including those of ethics, funding, involvement, language, resources and support. Three key principle reasons (moral, political and research based) help explain why the authors should see more adoption of such approaches in substance use-related research. Research limitations/implications This paper represents authors’ views which are by their nature very subjective. Practical implications Implementation of the key considerations highlighted within this paper can lead to an active adoption of PAR and PAI methodologies within alcohol and drug research. Increasing the use of such methodologies will allow commissioners, researchers and service providers to develop a more nuanced understanding of the experiences of and responses to alcohol and drug use. Originality/value This paper captures critical conversations at a time of increased calls for service user involvement across all aspects of alcohol and other drug provision, including evaluation and research
7
Kunt, Zeynep. "Art-based methods for Participatory Action Research (PAR)." Interactions: Studies in Communication & Culture 11, no. 1 (April 1, 2020): 87–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1386/iscc_00008_1.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
By reflecting on alternative forms of knowledge co-production through art-based methods, the article discusses the potential of Participatory Action Research (PAR) as a responsive research praxis. Art-based methods have widely been used in research engaging communities through giving access to the worlds of participants. At the intersections of disciplines, benefiting from a range of art forms from photography to theatre, this approach provides the space and tools for the exploration of multiple perspectives about shared problems or questions. In this respect, PAR is a significant methodology for communication studies with its alternative ways of knowledge production by positioning ‘dialogue’ and ‘participation’ at the centre.
8
Parsons,, Mickey L., Catherine Robichaux,, and Carmen Warner-Robbins,. "Empowered Caring: An Ethical Framework for Participatory Action Research." International Journal of Human Caring 12, no. 3 (April 2008): 74–78. http://dx.doi.org/10.20467/1091-5710.12.3.74.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Participatory action research (PAR), as a “new paradigm” approach, involves additional ethical and political issues beyond those encountered in empirical and interpretive models of science. This paper describes PAR methodology, a comprehensive ethical framework that is inclusive of the ethic of care and virtue, and applications with formerly incarcerated women.
9
Bennett, Marlyn. "A Review of the Literature on the Benefits and Drawbacks of Participatory Action Research." First Peoples Child & Family Review 1, no. 1 (May 25, 2020): 19–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/1069582ar.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
This paper reviews Participatory Action Research as a methodology. It maps the origins of Participatory Action Research (PAR) and discusses the benefits and challenges that have been identified by other researchers in utilizing PAR approaches in conducting research.
10
Gleerup, Janne, Lars Hulgaard, and Simon Teasdale. "Action research and participatory democracy in social enterprise." Social Enterprise Journal 16, no. 1 (October 3, 2019): 46–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/sej-02-2019-0012.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to introduce the reader to the Nordic tradition of Critical Utopian Action Research (CUAR) and to demonstrate how CUAR might reinvigorate participatory democracy as an intrinsic characteristic of social enterprise. This leads us to sketch out the beginnings of how researchers might work with communities to help realise their democratic impulses through social enterprise. Design/methodology/approach This paper aims to synthesise the participatory action research literature, particularly CUAR, with literature on social enterprise and democracy to demonstrate how the two approaches might fruitfully be combined. Findings The authors show how CUAR might be utilised by researchers, to articulate new social enterprise organisational responses to local problems or to reinvigorate democracy within existing social enterprises. Originality/value This exploratory paper marks (we believe) the first attempt to bring together social enterprise and CUAR.
11
Cammock, Radilaite, Cath Conn, and Shoba Nayar. "Strengthening Pacific voices through Talanoa participatory action research." AlterNative: An International Journal of Indigenous Peoples 17, no. 1 (February 19, 2021): 120–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1177180121996321.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Approaches to health and social research and development in the Pacific are dominated by Eurocentric frameworks that fail to reflect the region’s ethnic diversity and inherent cultural knowledge and belief systems. We aimed to advance innovative, indigenous methodology with a focus on youth voice and transformative approaches that contribute to a decolonising and sustainable model of development. Talanoa—a Pacific framework for communicating and connecting—and participatory action research were adapted to create a unique Pacific “action cycle” focused on providing opportunities to (a) hear from fruit and vegetable young entrepreneurs and (b) foster healthy and sustainable food systems among young entrepreneurs in Suva, Fiji. A Fijian worldview helped to centralise Fijian concepts of knowledge enquiry and research. This article describes the way in which Pacific Talanoa can be incorporated within a Fijian epistemological paradigm for research and development undertaken in the Fijian context.
12
Pacilli, Maria Giuseppina, Miretta Prezza, and Emanuela Zampatti. "Un'esperienza di ricerca realizzata nel progetto di home visiting "Raggiungere gli irraggiungibili": una action research?" PSICOLOGIA DI COMUNITA', no. 2 (February 2009): 67–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.3280/psc2008-002008.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
- The aim of the present work was to examine whether and how a research performed in the "Raggiungere gli irraggiungibili" Italian home visiting project may be considered an action research experience. The authors analyzed this research experience "two studies about the mothers-nurses relationship applying the five phases (diagnosing, action planning, taking action, evaluating, specifying learning) of the Susman's cyclical model of the action research. Moreover, since the evaluative research may adopt the action research methodology, the research experience of the home visiting project was examined applying the practical participatory evaluation approach. Keywords: home visiting, participatory evaluation, action research, practical participatory Evaluation
13
Meleo-Erwin, Zoë C. "Fat Bodies, Qualitative Research and the Spirit of Participatory Action Research." International Review of Qualitative Research 3, no. 3 (November 2010): 335–50. http://dx.doi.org/10.1525/irqr.2010.3.3.335.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Participatory Action Research (PAR) may be conceived of as a politic or an epistemology rather than a rigid methodology. If this is the case, how can PAR inform other qualitative methodologies? How can qualitative researchers adopt the spirit of PAR without doing PAR work itself? In this work, I seek to explore these questions by reviewing how PAR can guide my future dissertation work on the productive effects of the obesity epidemic. I examine how I might base my research in the ethics and politics of social justice and yet also remain open to and accountable for the ways in which my choice of methods reflects what can be seen as the colonizing approach of traditional social science.
14
Ripoll Gonzalez, Laura, and Fred Gale. "Combining participatory action research with sociological intervention to investigate participatory place branding." Qualitative Market Research: An International Journal 23, no. 1 (January 22, 2020): 199–216. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/qmr-02-2018-0028.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Purpose Place branding research has recently focused on developing more inclusive models to better capture the co-creation of place identities. This paper aims to investigate stakeholder communication interactions in place branding processes to inform alternative, participatory, network governance models of stakeholder engagement. Design/methodology/approach The literature on stakeholder engagement in place branding processes is sparse. Through a regional case study of the Australian island state of Tasmania, the paper combines participatory action research (PAR) with the method of sociological intervention (SI) to investigate how participants individually and collectively reflect on their practices and patterns of engagement. Findings By combining PAR with SI, participants were enabled to gain a greater appreciation of how cooperation and collective self-reflection enhance effective place branding practices. Furthermore, by facilitating participants to compile a list of impediments to collaboration, the research informs efforts to develop more inclusive governance models for place branding. Finally, the PAR/SI method itself served as a practical tool to encourage enhanced stakeholder engagement in applied settings. Research limitations/implications The approach is based on a single case study in a particular regional context and the findings require replication in other jurisdictions. Practical implications PAR/SI is a practical tool to achieve greater stakeholder engagement and enhance collaborative social action through a process of collective, critical reflection in applied settings. Originality/value The paper advances understanding of ways to operationalize participatory place branding through more inclusive, multistakeholder governance arrangements.
15
Benjamin-Thomas, Tanya Elizabeth, Debbie Laliberte Rudman, Jeshuran Gunaseelan, Vinod Joseph Abraham, Debra Cameron, Colleen McGrath, and Samuel Prasanna Vinoth Kumar. "A participatory filmmaking process with children with disabilities in rural India: Working towards inclusive research." Methodological Innovations 12, no. 3 (September 2019): 205979911989079. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2059799119890795.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Children with disabilities often experience exclusion within their communities, and this exclusion can extend into research processes. The United Nations Convention on the Rights of the Child, however, emphasizes that children of all abilities need to be involved as decision makers in matters affecting them. This article provides an in-depth description of the process of a participatory action research project carried out with children with disabilities from a rural village in India. It argues for the utility of participatory filmmaking as a research methodology that supports inclusion of children with disabilities as co-researchers in research and action processes. The different phases of the research project, namely the preparatory, participatory research, and the action phase, are made transparent along with the details of activities carried out within each phase. The technical and pragmatic challenges faced within this participatory filmmaking process are pointed out, and strategies used to negotiate challenges and adapt this methodology to fit context-specific needs are shared. This account of the complex, yet flexible and adaptable, participatory filmmaking process is presented as means to support critical and informed uptakes of participatory filmmaking for inclusive research practices with children with disabilities.
16
Meyer, Michelle Annette, Marccus Hendricks, Galen D. Newman, Jaimie Hicks Masterson, John T. Cooper, Garett Sansom, Nasir Gharaibeh, et al. "Participatory action research: tools for disaster resilience education." International Journal of Disaster Resilience in the Built Environment 9, no. 4/5 (September 28, 2018): 402–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ijdrbe-02-2017-0015.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Purpose Participatory action research can improve scientific knowledge and community capacity to address disaster resilience and environmental justice. Evidence from the literature suggests that resident participation enhances assessment of environmental risks, raises awareness and empowers residents to fight for equitable distribution of hazard and climate risk adaptations. Yet, risk assessment and urban planning processes still frequently operate within expertise-driven groups without significant community engagement. Such fragmentation results in part from a lack of appreciation for community expertise in built environment adaptations and educational tools to support resident involvement in the often technical built environment planning processes. Design/methodology/approach A participatory research and place-based education project was developed that enhanced co-learning between residents and researchers while collecting and analyzing local data on flood resilience in the built environment. Five research activities constitute the curriculum of resilience education on stormwater infrastructure: establishment of partnership agreement/memorandum of understanding, participatory GIS to identify flooding issues, water quality testing and health survey, stormwater infrastructure assessment and urban/landscape design. Partners included high school and college students, residents and environmental justice organizations. Findings Outcomes include a stakeholder-approved infrastructure assessment smartphone application, neighborhood maps of drainage issues, a report of water containments and neighborhood-scaled green infrastructure provisions and growth plans. Findings indicate that participatory research positively contributed to resilience knowledge of participants. Originality/value This paper outlines an interdisciplinary pedagogical strategy for resilience planning that engages residents to assess and monitor the performance of stormwater infrastructure and create resilience plans. The paper also discusses challenges and opportunities for similar participatory projects.
17
Chesnay, Catherine T. "THROUGH A FEMINIST POSTSTRUCTURALIST LENS: EMBODIED SUBJECTIVITES AND PARTICIPATORY ACTION RESEARCH." Canadian Journal of Action Research 17, no. 3 (December 21, 2016): 57–74. http://dx.doi.org/10.33524/cjar.v17i3.286.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
An emerging literature has been building bridges between poststructuralism and participatory action research, highlighting the latter’s potential for transformative action. Using examples from participative action research projects with incarcerated or previously incarcerated women, this article discusses how participatory action research is a methodology that can be enabling and restraining, with the effect of destabilising or maintaining or existing relations of power. Theorizing embodied subjectivity as a vehicle and an effect of power, this article explores how participation and action can have normalizing and disciplinary effects, as well as be sites in which participants can interrogate and frame subjectivities in new and alternative ways.
18
Njå, Ove, and Eivind L. Rake. "An Essay on Research Methodology: An Alternative Approach to Incident Command Research Through Participatory Action Research." Journal of Contingencies and Crisis Management 16, no. 2 (June 2008): 91–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5973.2008.00537.x.
Повний текст джерела
19
Kaptani, Erene, and Nira Yuval-Davis. "Participatory Theatre as a Research Methodology: Identity, Performance and Social Action among Refugees." Sociological Research Online 13, no. 5 (September 2008): 1–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.5153/sro.1789.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
The paper is based on the ESRC research project: ‘Identity, Performance and Social Action: Community Theatre Among Refugees’ which is part of the research programme on ‘Identities and Social Action’. After describing the project, the paper examines the methodological specificities and different stages of Playback and Forum Theatre. The latter includes image work, character building, scenes and interventions. It argues that overall participatory theatre, techniques as sociological research methods, provide different kinds of data and information than other methods – embodied, dialogical and illustrative. The paper ends by examining the circumstances in which the use of these techniques as research methodology are be beneficial. It also calls for an overall wider use of these techniques in sociological research, especially to study narratives of identity of marginalised groups, as well as to illustrate perceptions and experiences of social positionings and power relations in and outside community groupings. Using participatory theatre as a research tool, therefore, can be considered as one form of action research.
20
Thawinwong, Chareewat, and Wirot Sanrattana. "Teachers and Participatory Action Research for Developing Learning Environments." World Journal of Education 12, no. 3 (June 23, 2022): 17. http://dx.doi.org/10.5430/wje.v12n3p17.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
This research aims to develop learning environments through Participatory Action Research (PAR) methodology in a specific context of the Department of Electronics, Nong Han Industrial and Community Education College. Three development outcomes are expected: (1) changes in expected and non-expected outcomes of action; (2) action-based learning in the researchers, research participants and the institute and (3) knowledge from the grounded theory. The results are as the followings: 1) there are positive changes in both expected and unanticipated outcomes consisting of the implementation of the co-designated development approaches and the nature of the expected learning environments, 2) the researchers, research participants, and the institute learn about the efficiency of working together, which makes everyone realize how inefficient working alone was in the past, and 3) a body of knowledge gained from practice describes the relationship between the expected changes, and the driving force and resistances to change as well as ways to overcome the resistances.
21
Gershon, Robyn R. M., Marcie S. Rubin, Kristine A. Qureshi, Allison N. Canton, and Frederick J. Matzner. "Participatory Action Research Methodology in Disaster Research: Results From the World Trade Center Evacuation Study." Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness 2, no. 3 (October 2008): 142–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/dmp.0b013e318184b48f.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
ABSTRACTObjective: Participatory action research (PAR) methodology is an effective tool in identifying and implementing risk-reduction interventions. It has been used extensively in occupational health research, but not, to our knowledge, in disaster research. A PAR framework was incorporated into the World Trade Center evacuation study, which was designed to identify the individual, organizational, and structural (environmental) factors that affected evacuation from the World Trade Center Towers 1 and 2 on September 11, 2001. PAR teams—comprising World Trade Center evacuees, study investigators, and expert consultants—worked collaboratively to develop a set of recommendations designed to facilitate evacuation from high-rise office buildings and reduce risk of injury among evacuees.Methods: Two PAR teams worked first separately and then collectively to identify data-driven strategies for improvement of high-rise building evacuation.Results: The teams identified interventions targeting individual, organizational, and structural (environmental) barriers to safe and rapid evacuation.Conclusions: PAR teams were effective in identifying numerous feasible and cost-effective strategies for improvement of high-rise emergency preparedness and evacuation. This approach may have utility in other workplace disaster prevention planning and response programs. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2008;2:142–149)
22
Bonin, Sandrine, Wafa Singh, Veena Suresh, Tarek Rashed, Kuiljeit Uppaal, Rajiv Nair, and Rao R. Bhavani. "A priority action roadmap for women's economic empowerment (PARWEE) amid COVID-19: a co-creation approach." International Journal of Gender and Entrepreneurship 13, no. 2 (August 5, 2021): 142–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ijge-09-2020-0148.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Purpose The study aims to co-create a “priority action roadmap for women's economic empowerment” based on women's top priorities to charting recovery directions. Doing so contributes to the growing body of knowledge on COVID-19 literature in at least four areas: assessing COVID-19 impacts on women entrepreneurs; mapping these impacts with four interdependent women's entrepreneurial ecosystem components; innovating a co-creation methodology based on remote participatory research; and providing a replicable model to perform action-oriented research in the context of COVID-19 impacts. Design/methodology/approach A co-creation methodology is proposed, combining systems-thinking and remote participatory research to engage women entrepreneurs and institutional stakeholders to prioritize impact, response actions and recovery needs in the wake of COVID-19. A ranking exercise using the analytic hierarchy process was used to derive ranking and assess user inputs' consistency. Findings The study exemplifies the integration of participatory methods and mathematical tool to engage stakeholders in prioritizing recovery work. PARWEE action items ranked by entrepreneurs and vetted by institutional stakeholders cover: access to finances, capacity building, health care, public and private partnership, marketing opportunities and formation of active advocacy groups to voice out women entrepreneurs' needs to institutional stakeholders. Results show a slight difference in the ranking of priority actions between experience owners and fresh starters. Originality/value This study innovated a new co-creation methodology for remotely engaging stakeholders of the women's entrepreneurial ecosystem, which is grounded in evidence and provides a replicable model for performing action-oriented research.
23
Ward, James, and Di Bailey. "A participatory action research methodology in the management of self-harm in prison." Journal of Mental Health 22, no. 4 (January 16, 2013): 306–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.3109/09638237.2012.734645.
Повний текст джерела
24
Yang, Jing. "Participatory action research: Promoting partnership between a social work team and mothers of hemophiliac children." Action Research 18, no. 1 (December 18, 2019): 102–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1476750319895311.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
This article focuses on a participatory action research project as a process for improving social work practice and empowering mothers with hemophiliac children. Four stages of the action research are presented in this study. The research played a critical consciousness-raising and capacity-building role facilitating the mothers’ transformation from passive victims to active subjects. In addition, participatory action research contributed to identifying the emerging needs of families with hemophiliac children and improving the quality of social work services. We concluded that participatory action research is an effective way to empower disadvantaged people. This research methodology also facilitates social work practice in a non-traditional field. It is argued that participatory action research as a way of empowering the vulnerable also entails risks as attempts to redistribute power may earn further stigmatization and discrimination, especially from those whose existing power is challenged. Social work, as a profession committed to a more just and equal society, should be wary of this further stigmatization and insist on principles of social justice, human rights, collective responsibility, and respect for diversity. The article concludes by examining the limitations of employing participatory action research and makes recommendations for future programs.
25
Crowley, Kathleen A., Ronnie Myers, Halley E. M. Riley, Stephen S. Morse, Paul Brandt-Rauf, and Robyn R. M. Gershon. "Using Participatory Action Research to Identify Strategies to Improve Pandemic Vaccination." Disaster Medicine and Public Health Preparedness 7, no. 4 (June 7, 2013): 424–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/dmp.2013.72.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
AbstractObjectiveDeveloping and implementing effective strategies to increase influenza vaccination rates among health care personnel is an ongoing challenge, especially during a pandemic. We used participatory action research (PAR) methodology to identify targeted vaccination interventions that could potentially improve vaccine uptake in a medical center.MethodsFront-line medical center personnel were recruited to participate in 2 PAR teams (clinical and nonclinical staff). Data from a recent medical center survey on barriers and facilitators to influenza (seasonal, pandemic, and combination) vaccine uptake were reviewed, and strategies to increase vaccination rates among medical center personnel were identified.ResultsFeasible, creative, and low-cost interventions were identified, including organizational strategies that differed from investigator-identified interventions. The recommended strategies also differed by team. The nonclinical team suggested programs focused on dispelling vaccination-related myths, and the clinical team suggested campaigns emphasizing the importance of vaccination to protect patients.ConclusionsPAR methodology was useful to identify innovative and targeted recommendations for increasing vaccine uptake. By involving representative front-line workers, PAR may help medical centers improve influenza vaccination rates across all work groups. (Disaster Med Public Health Preparedness. 2013;0:1–7)
26
Hammad, Suzanne, Alice Alunni, and Tamara Alkhas. "Reflections on the potential (and limits) of action research as ethos, methodology and practice: A case study of a women’s empowerment programme in the Middle East." Action Research 17, no. 2 (March 28, 2018): 162–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1476750318759778.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
This paper argues that an evidence-based approach to advocacy led by and targeting women could amplify women’s positioning in the political and economic realms. Participatory Action Research is examined as a process for mobilisation, coalition-building and evidence-based advocacy and action, through a case study of a multi-country British Council supported programme that incorporated an action research approach. 1 Drawing from the experiences and perceptions of its participants, it offers reflective insights into the theory and practice of action research and its empowerment potential. The findings confirm a widespread support for the use of Participatory Action Research as a starting point for stronger advocacy work, showing its positive transformative effects on individuals, groups and coalition. Participatory Action Research contributes to evidence-based advocacy that is more relevant and inclusive, and arguably empowering for women advocates.
27
Arstein-Kerslake, Anna, Piers Gooding, Sarah Mercer, Marlena Raymond, and Bernadette McSherry. "Implementing a Participatory Human Rights-Based Research Methodology: The Unfitness to Plead Project." Journal of Human Rights Practice 11, no. 3 (November 1, 2019): 589–606. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jhuman/huz034.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Abstract This article describes a novel action-research methodology that combines aspects of participatory methods and emancipatory principles into a human rights-based framework. The history of these different methods is discussed and the authors then explain how the methods can be combined to create a participatory human rights-based research methodology. This new methodology has the potential for high social impact, community inclusion, and scholarly output. The article also describes the implementation of the methodology on a project which analysed the human rights compliance of unfitness to plead laws in the Australian criminal justice system. This project developed a system of support persons within community legal centres across Australia in order to build an evidence-base for good practice in supporting people with cognitive disability who are charged with a crime. The new participatory human rights-based methodology was successful on this project and is replicable in future human rights research.
28
Schensul, Daniel. "Mapping the Par Path: Outcome Evaluation of Participatory Action Research Interventions with Youth." Practicing Anthropology 26, no. 2 (April 1, 2004): 51–55. http://dx.doi.org/10.17730/praa.26.2.442362017u84j743.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
There is a large and growing number of participatory action research (PAR) programs, both with youth and with the general population. There is significant literature on evaluation methodology, including on making evaluations more participatory (a topic addressed elsewhere in this issue). However, rarely are the two linked: there are very few published works on evaluations of PAR programs or PAR evaluation methodology. The lack of focus on evaluation of PAR is particularly troubling given the shift towards foundation and federal funding of ‘science-based,’ or rigorously evaluated, interventions with youth. Evaluation is becoming increasingly necessary in establishing interventions as legitimate. If PAR is to progress along the path towards prominence and viability with respect to youth-oriented intervention, then evaluation of PAR is the map needed to follow that path.
29
Trott, Carlie D. "Reshaping our world: Collaborating with children for community-based climate change action." Action Research 17, no. 1 (March 2019): 42–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1476750319829209.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
This paper documents a collaborative, multi-site participatory action research project in collaboration with children to act on climate change within local community settings. The project was an after-school program that combined hands-on climate change educational activities with photovoice, a participatory action research method that uses digital photography as the basis for problem identification, group dialogue, and social change action. Grounded in transformative sustainability learning theory and integrated with an arts-based participatory action research methodology, the program was designed to strengthen children’s climate change awareness and sense of agency through youth-led action projects. After describing the program, this article details the collaborative action projects designed and carried out by 10- to 12-year-olds in each community (e.g., policy advocacy, tree-planting, community garden) as well as how the program facilitated children’s constructive climate change engagement through children’s enjoyment and agentic action. The critical importance of participatory process and collaborative action in strengthening children’s sense of agency is discussed.
30
Peltier, Cindy. "An Application of Two-Eyed Seeing: Indigenous Research Methods With Participatory Action Research." International Journal of Qualitative Methods 17, no. 1 (November 20, 2018): 160940691881234. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1609406918812346.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
In this time of reconciliation, Indigenous researchers-in-relation are sharing research paradigms and approaches that align with Indigenous worldviews. This article shares an interpretation of the Mi’kmaw concept of Two-Eyed Seeing as the synthesis of Indigenous methodology and participatory action research situated within an Indigenous paradigm of relevant, reciprocal, respectful, and responsible research. Two-Eyed Seeing is discussed as a guiding approach for researchers offering Indigenous voices and ways of knowing as a means to shift existing qualitative research paradigms. The author offers practical considerations for conducting research with Indigenous peoples in a “good and authentic way.” Through the co-creation of knowledge with Indigenous communities, a collective story was produced as a wellness teaching tool to foster the transfer of knowledge in a meaningful way.
31
Corbett, Andrea M., Karen Francis, and Ysanne Chapman. "Feminist-informed participatory action research: A methodology of choice for examining critical nursing issues." International Journal of Nursing Practice 13, no. 2 (April 2007): 81–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1440-172x.2007.00612.x.
Повний текст джерела
32
Trajber, Rachel, Catherine Walker, Victor Marchezini, Peter Kraftl, Débora Olivato, Sophie Hadfield-Hill, Cristiana Zara, and Shirley Fernandes Monteiro. "Promoting climate change transformation with young people in Brazil: participatory action research through a looping approach." Action Research 17, no. 1 (March 2019): 87–107. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1476750319829202.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Amid research into the mounting social and environmental threats presented by climate change, young people’s everyday experiences and knowledges are often overlooked, despite being the generation that will be most affected by climate change. We present a ‘looping’ methodology, developed through collaborative work between two distinct but complementary research projects wherein young people in the Paraíba do Sul watershed, São Paulo state, Brazil shared their perspectives on (respectively) climate-related disasters and the food–water–energy nexus. The approach brings together the theoretical framings of citizen science and nexus thinking under the aegis of participatory action research, to identify points of mutual learning in relation to the knowledge, action and critique co-produced with young people. This ‘looping methodology’ enables meta-analytic insights into how participatory action research, looped with other forms of action-oriented research, can enable young people and other protagonists to articulate and act upon the complex, multi-scalar processes that characterise what it means to live in uncertain social, political and environmental times.
33
Zani, Bruna. "L'intervento psico-sociale, psicologia di comunitŕ e psicologia della salute." PSICOLOGIA DELLA SALUTE, no. 3 (March 2009): 83–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.3280/pds2008-003007.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
- The aim of this article is to explore the areas at the boundaries of community and health psychology, underlining the importance of a critical approach in the analysis of common issues of the two disciplines. In particular, the usefulness of the methodology of participatory action research in realising the goals of a community health psychology is emphasized. Key words: community health psychology, critical health psychology, participatory action research.
34
Hughes, Hilary, Rike Wolf, and Marcus Foth. "Informed digital learning through social living labs as participatory methodology." Information and Learning Science 118, no. 9/10 (October 10, 2017): 518–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ils-05-2017-0041.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Purpose The purpose of this paper is to explore social living labs as a participatory methodology and context for fostering digital literacy and community well-being. This approach is examined through a case study of Food Rescue Townsville, a voluntary community organisation in North Queensland, Australia. Design/methodology/approach Using qualitative case study methodology, the research investigated volunteers’ experience of a social living lab where they selected, installed and used open source Food Rescue Robot software. Findings The social living lab enhanced volunteers’ digital literacy and the organisation’s efficiency. The participatory nature and transformative intentions of social living labs are similar to action research as both promote social change through collaboration. Research limitations/implications The case study intentionally focuses on one community organisation to gain in-depth insights of a real-life social living lab. Practical implications The paper models an innovative approach that contributes to community learning and well-being. It presents a social living labs framework for digital literacy development that is underpinned by participatory action research cycle and integrates informed learning principles. Social living labs provide a learning context and approach that extends beyond digital skills instruction to a holistic process of using information to learn. They enable individuals to participate as digital citizens in the creation, curation and use of digital information. Social implications Informed digital learning through social living labs addresses the digital divide by fostering digital participation, volunteering and community engagement. Originality/value The paper is of interest to researchers, information literacy educators and community groups. Theoretical insights and participatory practices of the Food Rescue Townsville case, and the proposed social living labs framework are transferable to other communities.
35
Gamboni, Valentina. "Developing academic librarians’ skills in e-book services through Participatory Action Research." Information and Learning Science 118, no. 9/10 (October 10, 2017): 535–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ils-05-2017-0044.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Purpose The purpose of this study is to understand how to improve librarians’ skills, using an active and reflective participative process, to develop a university e-book service. This research involved librarians who could not participate in a formal learning course and explored the possibility of improving their skills with e-books by means of informal and non-formal learning. Design/methodology/approach Using a qualitative methodology framework, the research was a participatory action research (PAR) study, utilizing a recurrent five-phase cycle – analysis, plan, action, evaluation, reflection/sharing – that joins research and reflective practice in action. Each phase has been discussed by categories defined from the gathered data, highlighting the evidence of participants’ contributions, to analyse the situation, plan and carry out interventions, and evaluate outcomes. Participants suggested and put into action informal and non-formal methods of learning to develop e-book skills that they named and included in broader categories such as technical, content selection, purchase and management and use. Findings Participants increased their awareness of the topic, and the PAR process also contributed to their personal development. PAR is recommended as a research process that fosters learning outcomes, as well as personal and professional development. Originality/value PAR has been applied in the Italian academic setting to understand how librarians can develop skills in e-book services through informal and non-formal learning methods.
36
Morris, Marika. "Inuit involvement in developing a participatory action research project on youth, violence prevention, and health promotion." Études/Inuit/Studies 40, no. 1 (June 14, 2017): 105–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.7202/1040147ar.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
This article describes the process of developing an academic and community participatory action research partnership on Inuit youth and violence prevention through social media. Pauktuutit Inuit Women of Canada chose the topic, defined the research goals, co-developed the first draft of the project and its methodology, established and chaired an Inuit advisory committee, spearheaded consultations with other Inuit organizations to refine the methodology, and co-facilitated a focus group. The “action” part of the project involved using the research results to develop with Inuit youth an outreach strategy to prevent violence and promote health via social media. The article discusses the research process, which was guided by Inuit Qaujimajatuqangit (traditional values) and which used a methodology redesigned by Inuit, including youth and elders. The result was a violence prevention focus group for Inuit aged 18 to 25, co-led by the Mamisarvik Healing Centre, and an online survey of social media use among Inuit aged 18 to 25. This participatory action research process is presented as a potential model for academic-community partnerships.
37
Kile, Mia. "Uncovering Social Issues Through Photovoice: A Comprehensive Methodology." HERD: Health Environments Research & Design Journal 15, no. 1 (October 27, 2021): 29–35. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/19375867211055101.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Photovoice is a form of participatory action research and community-based participatory research and often used in social sciences to understand the needs of others and uncover the challenges and assets that may exist. Photovoice engages participants in the research process by inviting them to share their experiences through photographs and personal narratives. This act of storytelling and group discussion provides emotional connections among the participant cohort. Through the discussion of shared experience, common themes may arise. This column provides and overview of the photovoice methodology and highlights some of the benefits and limitations one might experience when leading photovoice based projects. Photovoice is a powerful tool that can prove useful for design researchers and practitioners alike as they seek to understand the challenges facing others. It is through this understanding that transformation to improve situations can occur.
38
De Oliveira, Bruno. "On the news today: challenging homelessness through participatory action research." Housing, Care and Support 21, no. 1 (March 19, 2018): 13–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/hcs-01-2018-0002.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Purpose How can people with lived experience of homelessness actively participate in contesting their marginalisation? The purpose of this paper is to suggest that involving people who are homeless in participatory action research (PAR) is one such strategy. This paper shows that such an approach can have a significant impact on empowering people with direct of experience of homelessness to challenge prevailing social discourses, particularly in terms of the way in which the local media presents homelessness as a social issue. Design/methodology/approach A PAR approach informed the design, development and dissemination of the study on which this paper is based. Analytically, it is underpinned by Foucauldian discourse analysis (FDA). FDA, with its focus on power relations in society, is noted to be particularly useful for analysing local media representations of homeless people. Findings The research reported here found that academic practitioners and homeless people can work together to challenge media discourses, which serve to marginalise people affected by homelessness. Research limitations/implications The research reported here served to challenge some of the ways in homeless people are victimized and stigmatized. Practical implications The research reported here has the potential to inform future research concerned with understanding media presentations of homeless people. It can be seen as a model for how people affected by a particularly pernicious social issue can contribute to research in ways that go beyond researching for the sake of research. Originality/value The research reported here provides evidence of the emancipatory value of research that seeks to bring academic practitioners and homeless people together in a partnership to challenge vital social issues such as the power of the local media to frame understandings of homelessness.
39
Gragg, Richard Schulterbrandt, M. Miaisha Mitchell, Kareem M. Usher, Stephen Schensul, and Jean Schensul. "Collaboration of Community and University Scholars: Training in the Transformation of Research for Community Development." Practicing Anthropology 37, no. 4 (September 1, 2015): 44–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.17730/0888-4552-37.4.44.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Community-based Participatory Research (CBPR) provides a methodology that creates mutually beneficial and equitable partnerships between researchers and community people involved in positive change. Participatory Action Research (PAR) is rooted in trust, connectivity, and reciprocity to address issues and actions that remedy inequitable social, economic, and environmental problems arising from racism rooted in structural/political imbalances. In this paper, we discuss the Health Equity Alliance of Tallahassee (HEAT) and its affiliated six week Ethnographic Field School that trains graduate students in CBPR methodology by bringing faculty, local community activists and stakeholders, and students together for mutual learning in dynamic classroom, community, and social settings. The paper offers reflections on the experience by a student, HEAT activist, local and visiting faculty, and demonstrate how a model field school based on PAR offers an empirical approach to building capacity to address power inequities in local settings and beyond.
40
Hosseini, Mona. "Book Review: Decolonizing Transcultural Teacher Education through Participatory Action Research Dialogue, Culture, and Identity." International Journal of Education and Literacy Studies 9, no. 4 (November 5, 2021): 287. http://dx.doi.org/10.7575/aiac.ijels.v.9n.4p.287.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Decolonizing transcultural teacher education through participatory action research, culture, and identity sketches the laborious process of decolonizing the education in Belize in Central America. It consists of 9 chapters: introduction, review of the literature, methodology, findings and discussions (3 chapters), as well as the conclusion.
41
Bertozzi, Rita. "A Participatory Approach to Research with Migrant Working Adolescents." MIGRATION LETTERS 7, no. 1 (January 28, 2014): 57–67. http://dx.doi.org/10.33182/ml.v7i1.180.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Child-centred approaches focus on the children’s perspective and on participation. Participatory action research can be a fruitful methodology for investigating delicate topics such as child labour in migrant communities. This article presents a peer research project conducted in Rome (Italy) which actively involved a group of foreign working young people over two years and employed a variety of methodologies. Research methods will be illustrated and critically discussed, with a particular focus on the benefits for the migrant youths involved and ethical questions arising from this type of research. A brief summary of the main findings will also be provided.
42
Ortiz Aragón, Alfredo, and Kent Glenzer. "Untaming aid through action research: Seeking transformative reflective action." Action Research 15, no. 1 (March 2017): 3–14. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1476750317700253.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Planned international development—Official Development Assistance—pretends to address complex, intergenerational problems. The pretense is endemic to, and necessary for, the continuation of the development enterprise, frequently leading to docile projects. Official Development Assistance’s methodologies and methods are ill-matched for confronting such problems, while those of action research are well-suited to the task. Yet Official Development Assistance and action research are only infrequent and ephemeral bedmates. Research from five sites on three continents reveals five lessons for untaming aid through action research: (1) plan and develop programming iteratively and over long time frames to offer meaningful support to people’s lives, (2) develop new connective tissue and relational capital, (3) commit to inquiry and learning in specific contexts, (4) incrementally confront culturally embedded practice in a safe and feasible manner, and (5) use methodology to develop safe and participatory spaces that engage tacit and explicit perspectives and ways of knowing. This article, the introductory essay to the Action Research Journal’s special issue, “Development, Aid, and Social Transformation,” argues that adoption of these five practices could help untame Official Development Assistance and make it more powerful, ethical, and transformative.
43
Ai, Wenbo. "Participatory Action Research into Low Literates’ Medical Needs in Rural Communities." SciMedicine Journal 1, no. 4 (December 1, 2019): 176–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.28991/scimedj-2019-0104-3.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
This paper describes initial, exploratory fieldwork carried out at Hantun village in Henan Province, China by a Royal College of Art research student in April 2018. It focuses on low literates’ medical issues – the prescription and taking of medicines as prescribed – and is divided into three:Stage 1: Initial exploration of work: interviews with doctors, survey of patients and participant observations;Stage 2: Reflective and reflexive observations and interviews, plus the participant workshop with low-literate villagers;Stage 3: Evaluating the participatory design.The aim of this stage of the research journey was to collect primary data, understand the behaviour of the core data set – their needs, desires, habits, perceptions and unique cognitive strategies in terms of use of visual elements – and identify problems within the context of healthcare in Hantun. What might be the system of public health advocacy and how does government – local and provincial – as well as public and private health services manage key issues? More importantly, this paper addresses the examination of design theory and evaluation of research methodology. It shows how participatory research methods may contribute to answering research questions and lead to the next research stage.
44
Keahey, Jennifer, Laura T. Raynolds, Sandra Kruger, and Andries du Toit. "Participatory commodity networking: An integrated framework for Fairtrade research and support." Action Research 16, no. 1 (August 9, 2016): 25–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1476750316661396.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
This article discusses the potential for humanizing production and trade relations by extending action research to multilateral commodity networks. Participatory action research and Fairtrade certification both promote social justice, but the first faces difficulties in terms of scalability, while the second experiences challenges in terms of producer support. As conventional research has failed to deliver methods for improving services, we worked with small-scale farmers in South Africa’s rooibos tea industry to meet this gap. Responding to producer concerns regarding market and certification access, we conducted a participatory research, training, and networking program to establish a farmer leadership network within the rooibos industry. Despite the challenges involved in advancing participation in an arena marked by complex power relations, our work helped stakeholders establish trust, improve knowledge, and begin addressing issues. By incorporating commodity network analysis into action research methodology, our model facilitates both community and organizational development, offering a multilateral framework for collaborative inquiry.
45
Marcos, Luis, M. Rosales, Alexander Rödlach, and John Stone. "Comunidad Maya Pixan Ixim and University Researchers: Partnering in Community Health Development." Practicing Anthropology 34, no. 1 (January 1, 2012): 37–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.17730/praa.34.1.w8n1x25305v0735l.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Applied anthropologists value participatory action research (PAR). In 2008, the Society for Applied Anthropology bestowed the 2008 Bronislaw Malinowski Award upon Orlando Fals-Borda, who is best known for developing the theory and methodology of this approach and his leadership in social and political activism on behalf of and with marginalized communities. Fals-Borda argues that PAR encourages value-driven and collaboratively-conducted research that transforms the relationship between marginalized communities and the organizations that serve them so as to improve their socio-political situation (Fals-Borda and Rahman 1991). Comparably, the Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality of the US Department of Health and Human Services has recognized the value of community-based participatory research for both researchers and the community being studied (Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality 2004:1). The Agency has emphasized the importance of academic professionals and community members working together in community-based participatory research as equal partners in developing, implementing, and using research findings to improve local health and healthcare. Community-based participatory research and participatory action research share many features.
46
Almaguer-Kalixto, Patricia E., Margarita Maass Moreno, and José Antonio Amozurrutia. "Sociocybernetics and action research: Analysis and intervention in complex social problems." Current Sociology 67, no. 4 (April 24, 2019): 544–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0011392119837576.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Participatory action research (PAR) has been used as a methodology for social intervention that combines research enquiry and action in the analysis of and intervention in complex social problems. However, a better systematization of complex social research processes is required to enable reflexivity at a participatory level and second-order observation of the full research system constructed. This article proposes a PAR model using conceptual and methodological elements of sociocybernetics, which is the application of first- and second-order cybernetics and general systems theory to social sciences. The authors see this model as able to reinforce the systematization of PAR, enabling a second-order reflexivity and feedback process through information analysis and communication strategies. The first part of the article explains how sociocybernetics concepts can contribute to this sociological methodology and discusses points of similarity between the two approaches and the basis of the proposed model. The second part addresses an empirical case of PAR developed in the context of the High Atlas in Morocco using the proposed model. By reinforcing a systems perspective, internal and external elements of the research system can be defined better to understand its relevance to optimal fulfilment of the research purpose. The value that sociocybernetics adds may be the comprehension of processes of change through the assimilation, accommodation and adaptation of the components and limits of the system, the feedback process and other interactions within the system and its environment, in order to analyse how social changes occur in complex settings.
47
Cordeiro, Luciana, Cassia Baldini Soares, and Leslie Rittenmeyer. "Unscrambling method and methodology in action research traditions: theoretical conceptualization of praxis and emancipation." Qualitative Research 17, no. 4 (December 8, 2016): 395–407. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1468794116674771.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
Action research is a participatory approach that is used in an array of contexts. From its first proposition it comprises four core principles: participation and collaboration; a constant spiral cycle of self-reflection; knowledge generation; and practice transformation. Praxis and emancipation are two important analytical categories in AR, but are conceptualized differently in the two existing AR traditions. These conceptualizations reveal different AR aims, which lead to either the use of AR as a method (Northern tradition) or as a methodology (Southern tradition). Much depends on the researchers’ interest and worldview. Our objective in this paper is to compare how emancipation and praxis are theorized in both traditions. This discussion intends to add insight into the methodological understanding and utilization of AR.
48
Payne, Yasser Arafat, and Angela Bryant. "Street Participatory Action Research in Prison: A Methodology to Challenge Privilege and Power in Correctional Facilities." Prison Journal 98, no. 4 (June 6, 2018): 449–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0032885518776378.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
This article presents a prison research model grounded in street participatory action research (Street PAR) methodology but programmatically facilitated in an Inside-Out Prison Exchange Program class. Street PAR’s nine tenets were adapted to a prison setting, and we demonstrate its promise with a brief case study of research projects at one prison location. This article also explores the challenges scholars and incarcerated persons as researchers may face in correctional facilities. Street PAR and Inside-Out can improve prison environments and successful transition to local communities as a function of equipping incarcerated persons with reading, writing, and analytic skill sets.
49
Balthu, Krishna Chaitanya, and Ben Clegg. "Improving professional service operations: action research in a law firm." International Journal of Operations & Production Management 41, no. 6 (June 11, 2021): 805–29. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ijopm-10-2020-0696.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
PurposeThe purpose of this paper is to demonstrate how action research-based interventions can effect change in a complex and challenging professional service environment (Lewis and Brown, 2012). This paper presents a successful way to do this. First, by eliciting factors for change driven by deregulation in the United Kingdom’s (UK) legal service sector (Falconer, 2005). Second, by designing and implementing context-sensitive change in a selected legal service firm.Design/methodology/approachThis research adopts a participatory action research methodology involving the use of systems thinking (namely the PrOH modelling methodology) to design suitable interventions and catalyse change.FindingsThis study has generated new knowledge on three fronts–to the legal service operations, to methodology and to the intellectual framework used for abductive reasoning (Checkland and Poulter, 2006). Lessons are transferable to wider professional service operations research. Findings indicate, despite traditional challenges of delivering typical professional services, there is potential for rationalising processes and service delivery commodification, mainly in the low volume, high variety legal service typology (Silvestro et al., 1992).Research limitations/implicationsThis research uses data from an in-depth study of a single organisation.Practical implicationsThis research helped legal service professionals to improve overall efficiency and effectiveness and create new management tools.Social implicationsThis research could help improve legal service operations and make them more accessible.Originality/valueThis research applies a novel, systems thinking based methodology for the first time in a complex professional service operations environment leading to three-fold contributions in the areas of practice, theory and methodology. The paper uses a change management framework (the Change Kaleidoscope), a soft systems methodology (PrOH modelling) and applies these to legal services.
50
Onencan, Abby, Kenny Meesters, and Bartel Van de Walle. "Methodology for Participatory GIS Risk Mapping and Citizen Science for Solotvyno Salt Mines." Remote Sensing 10, no. 11 (November 19, 2018): 1828. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/rs10111828.
Повний текст джерелаАнотація:
The Horizon 2020 interim evaluation (2017) indicates a steep increase in citizen engagement in European Union Citizen Science (CS) projects, with less than 1% in budgetary terms and minimal influence. Research findings attribute weak CS influence to the restriction of citizen actions to data collection, with minimal or no engagement in co-design, co-creation, data analysis, and elucidation of results. We design a participatory GIS and CS methodology aimed at engaging the citizens in the entire Earth Observation (EO) project cycle. The methodology also seeks to address previous CS project challenges related to data quality, data interoperability, citizen-motivation, and participation. We draw the high-level requirements from the SENDAI framework of action and the three pillars of active citizen engagement, as enshrined in Principle 10 of the Rio Declaration and the Aarhus Convention. The primary input of the methodology is the Haklay (2018) approach for participatory mapping and CS, and the Reed (2009) stakeholder analysis framework. The proposed methodology comprises of three main parts: system analysis, stakeholder analysis, and a six-step methodology. We designed the six-step methodology using an iterative and flexible approach, to take account of unforeseen changes. Future research will focus on implementing the methodology and evaluating its effectiveness in the Solotvyno Saltmine case study in Ukraine.