Добірка наукової літератури з теми "Periprosthetic joint infections"

Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями

Оберіть тип джерела:

Ознайомтеся зі списками актуальних статей, книг, дисертацій, тез та інших наукових джерел на тему "Periprosthetic joint infections".

Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.

Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.

Статті в журналах з теми "Periprosthetic joint infections"

1

Lima, Ana Lucia L., Priscila R. Oliveira, Vladimir C. Carvalho, Eduardo S. Saconi, Henrique B. Cabrita, and Marcelo B. Rodrigues. "Periprosthetic Joint Infections." Interdisciplinary Perspectives on Infectious Diseases 2013 (2013): 1–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2013/542796.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Implantation of joint prostheses is becoming increasingly common, especially for the hip and knee. Infection is considered to be the most devastating of prosthesis-related complications, leading to prolonged hospitalization, repeated surgical intervention, and even definitive loss of the implant. The main risk factors to periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs) are advanced age, malnutrition, obesity, diabetes mellitus, HIV infection at an advanced stage, presence of distant infectious foci, and antecedents of arthroscopy or infection in previous arthroplasty. Joint prostheses can become infected through three different routes: direct implantation, hematogenic infection, and reactivation of latent infection. Gram-positive bacteria predominate in cases of PJI, mainlyStaphylococcus aureusandStaphylococcus epidermidis. PJIs present characteristic signs that can be divided into acute and chronic manifestations. The main imaging method used in diagnosing joint prosthesis infections is X-ray. Computed tomography (CT) scan may assist in distinguishing between septic and aseptic loosening. Three-phase bone scintigraphy using technetium has high sensitivity, but low specificity. Positron emission tomography using fluorodeoxyglucose (FDG-PET) presents very divergent results in the literature. Definitive diagnosis of infection should be made by isolating the microorganism through cultures on material obtained from joint fluid puncturing, surgical wound secretions, surgical debridement procedures, or sonication fluid. Success in treating PJI depends on extensive surgical debridement and adequate and effective antibiotic therapy. Treatment in two stages using a spacer is recommended for most chronic infections in arthroplasty cases. Treatment in a single procedure is appropriate in carefully selected cases.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

Sigmund, Irene K., Markus Luger, Reinhard Windhager, and Martin A. McNally. "Diagnosing periprosthetic joint infections." Bone & Joint Research 11, no. 9 (2022): 608–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/2046-3758.119.bjr-2022-0078.r1.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Aims This study evaluated the definitions developed by the European Bone and Joint Infection Society (EBJIS) 2021, the International Consensus Meeting (ICM) 2018, and the Infectious Diseases Society of America (IDSA) 2013, for the diagnosis of periprosthetic joint infection (PJI). Methods In this single-centre, retrospective analysis of prospectively collected data, patients with an indicated revision surgery after a total hip or knee arthroplasty were included between 2015 and 2020. A standardized diagnostic workup was performed, identifying the components of the EBJIS, ICM, and IDSA criteria in each patient. Results Of 206 included patients, 101 (49%) were diagnosed with PJI with the EBJIS definition. IDSA and ICM diagnosed 99 (48%) and 86 (42%) as infected, respectively. A total of 84 cases (41%) had an infection based on all three criteria. In 15 cases (n = 15/206; 7%), PJI was present when applying only the IDSA and EBJIS criteria. No infection was detected by one definition alone. Inconclusive diagnoses occurred more frequently with the ICM criteria (n = 30/206; 15%) compared to EBJIS (likely infections: n = 16/206; 8%) (p = 0.029). A better preoperative performance of the EBJIS definition was seen compared with the ICM and IDSA definitions (p < 0.001). Conclusion The novel EBJIS definition identified all PJIs diagnosed by any other criteria. Use of the EBJIS definition significantly reduced the number of uncertain diagnoses, allowing easier clinical decision-making. Cite this article: Bone Joint Res 2022;11(9):608–618.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
3

Saccente, Michael. "Periprosthetic Joint Infections." Infectious Diseases in Clinical Practice 7, no. 9 (1998): 431–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00019048-199812000-00003.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
4

Fedorov, E. A., S. O. Kretien, A. G. Samokhin, N. V. Tikunova, A. A. Korytkin, and V. V. Pavlov. "Short-term results of treatment of staphylococcal periprosthetic hip joint infection with combined antibiotics and bacteriophages treatment." Acta Biomedica Scientifica 6, no. 4 (2021): 50–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.29413/abs.2021-6.4.5.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Infectious complications after primary implantation of the hip joint are 0.5–3 %, and in the case of re-endoprosthetics, the risk of periprosthetic infection can reach 30 %. Also, we should not forget about the high percentage (16–20 %) of recurrence of periprosthetic infection of the hip joint, which leads to an unsatisfactory result of treatment up to amputation of a limb or even death of the patient. The reasons for the recurrence of the infectious process can be antibiotic resistance and antibiotic tolerance of microorganisms, as well as the ability of microorganisms to form biofilms on implants. In this regard, there is a constant need to search for alternative means of antimicrobial therapy, as well as to select the optimal ways of their delivery and deposition, which is of practical importance when performing surgical interventions in traumatology and orthopedics to protect the implantable structure from possible infection of the surgical site. One of the methods currently available to combat bacterial infections acquired antibiotic resistance and antibiotic tolerance is the use of natural viruses that infect bacterial bacteriophages. The above suggests a more effective suppression of periprosthetic infection, including persisters that deviate from antibiotics. It is, as a rule, associated with biofilms if used in conjunction with antibiotics and phages, when the use of bacteriophages predetermines the effectiveness of treatment. With the use of sensitive bacteriophages in the treatment of periprosthetic infections, a significant (p = 0.030) reduction in the rate of recurrence of infection (from 31 to 4.5 %) was observed. The use of lytic bacteriophages in traumatology and orthopedics is of great interest for phagotherapy of infections caused by antibiotic-resistant and biofilm-forming strains of bacteria. A clinical study using a single-stage surgical revision with simultaneous application of antibiotics and phages in the treatment of deep periprosthesis infection of the hip joint endoprosthesis, followed by 12 months follow-up for periprosthetic infection recurrence, demonstrated the effectiveness of the use of combined antibiotic and bacteriophages treatment.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
5

Bozhkova, Svetlana A., Rashid M. Tikhilov, and Vasily A. Artyukh. "Periprosthetic Joint Infection as a Socio-Economic Problem of Modern Orthopedics." Annals of the Russian academy of medical sciences 78, no. 6 (2024): 601–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.15690/vramn8370.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Periprosthetic joint infection is the main social and economic problem of modern orthopedics with a recurrence rate of chronic forms of up to 23.2–31.5%. The aim of this review is to inform various specialties doctors about the features of pathogenesis, etiology and treatment of periprosthetic joint infection, which significantly differ it from of other surgical site infections. The severity of infectious complications is due to the suppression of the patient’s immune system and microbial biofilms. Surgical treatment of periprosthetic joint infection involves debridement with preservation or removal of the implants, resection arthroplasty and arthrodesis. Today, in the treatment of more than 80% of cases of chronic infection, a two-stage approach is used, which allows to restore joint function after an average of 1.0–1.5 years. An integral part of the treatment of patients is high-dose, long-term and combined antibiotic therapy, which allows you to effectively deal with the leading pathogens of periprosthetic infection Staphylococcus aureus and S. epidermidis, the share of which is 46.5–57.5%. In the conditions of growing resistance of bacteria to antibiotics, the interest of researchers in the possibilities of using bacteriophages in the complex therapy of infections of bones and joints has increased. The cost of treatment exceeds the cost of “aseptic” joint replacement by 2–24 times and is characterized by a high level of disability and mortality of patients. Taking into account the numerous factors affecting the course and effectiveness of complex treatment of patients with periprosthetic infection, a multidisciplinary approach is currently considered the main component of success. The medical and social significance and high financial costs of treating patients with periprosthetic infection indicate the need for further research and the active implementation of effective scientific developments in the practical healthcare system.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
6

Tan, Timothy L., Michael M. Kheir, Dean D. Tan, and Javad Parvizi. "Polymicrobial Periprosthetic Joint Infections." Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 98, no. 24 (2016): 2082–88. http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.15.01450.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
7

Thiesen, Darius M., Seval Mumin-Gündüz, Thorsten Gehrke, et al. "Synchronous Periprosthetic Joint Infections." Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery 102, no. 4 (2020): 283–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.2106/jbjs.19.00835.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
8

Cierny,, G., and D. DiPasquale. "Periprosthetic Total Joint Infections." Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research 403 (October 2002): 23–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00003086-200210000-00005.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
9

Podhorecki, Adam, Artur Gądek, and Henryk Liszka. "Prevention of periprosthetic knee joint infections. Experience based on 590 patients treated before and after the introduction of a proprietary protocol." Chirurgia Narządów Ruchu i Ortopedia Polska 89, no. 2 (2024): 58–66. http://dx.doi.org/10.31139/chnriop.2024.89.2.2.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Introduction. Total knee arthroplasty is a widely performed procedure in orthopedics. One of its complications is periprosthetic joint infection. Efforts should be made to reduce their frequency by implementing appropriate preventive protocols. Objective. To assess the incidence of infectious complications and their association with comorbidities and to retrospectively evaluate the effectiveness of a polymodal protocol for preventing periprosthetic infections implemented in 2015. Further the paper aims to evaluate the spectrum of pathogens responsible for these complications. Materials and methods. A total of 590 cases were analyzed, 277 of which were operated on before the preventive protocol was introduced and 313 after its implementation. Results. Eleven cases of periprosthetic joint infections were diagnosed. Prolonged wound healing was observed in older individuals and diabetic patients. Increased risk of periprosthetic infections was found in obese individuals and those with inflammatory arthropathies. The implemented protocol did not impact the overall incidence of infectious complications in the studied population but a reduction in complications was observed in diabetic patients. The most commonly isolated pathogens were coagulase-negative Staphylococcus, followed by Staphylococcus aureus. Conclusions. The implemented protocol was effective in diabetic patients. The identified pathogens corresponded to those typically observed in periprosthetic infections in Europe.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
10

Sangaletti, Rudy, Luigi Zanna, Mustafa Akkaya, et al. "Periprosthetic joint infection in patients with multiple arthroplasties." Bone & Joint Journal 105-B, no. 3 (2023): 294–300. http://dx.doi.org/10.1302/0301-620x.105b3.bjj-2022-0800.r1.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
AimsDespite numerous studies focusing on periprosthetic joint infections (PJIs), there are no robust data on the risk factors and timing of metachronous infections. Metachronous PJIs are PJIs that can arise in the same or other artificial joints after a period of time, in patients who have previously had PJI.MethodsBetween January 2010 and December 2018, 661 patients with multiple joint prostheses in situ were treated for PJI at our institution. Of these, 73 patients (11%) developed a metachronous PJI (periprosthetic infection in patients who have previously had PJI in another joint, after a lag period) after a mean time interval of 49.5 months (SD 30.24; 7 to 82.9). To identify patient-related risk factors for a metachronous PJI, the following parameters were analyzed: sex; age; BMI; and pre-existing comorbidity. Metachronous infections were divided into three groups: Group 1, metachronous infections in ipsilateral joints; Group 2, metachronous infections of the contralateral lower limb; and Group 3, metachronous infections of the lower and upper limb.ResultsWe identified a total of 73 metachronous PJIs: 32 PJIs in Group 1, 38 in Group 2, and one in Group 3. The rate of metachronous infection was 11% (73 out 661 cases) at a mean of four years following first infection. Diabetes mellitus incidence was found significantly more frequently in the metachronous infection group than in non-metachronous infection group. The rate of infection in Group 1 (21.1%) was significantly higher (p = 0.049) compared to Groups 2 (6.2%) and 3 (3%). The time interval of metachronous infection development was shorter in adjacent joint infections. Concordance between the bacterium of the first PJI and that of the metachronous PJI in Group 1 (21/34) was significantly higher than Group 2 (13/38; p = 0.001).ConclusionThe findings of this study suggest that metachronous PJI occurs in more than one in ten patients with an index PJI. Female patients, diabetic patients, and patients with a polymicrobial index PJI are at significantly higher risk for developing a metachronous PJI. Furthermore, metachronous PJIs are significantly more likely to occur in an adjacent joint (e.g. ipsilateral hip and knee) as opposed to a more remote site (i.e. contralateral or upper vs lower limb). Additionally, adjacent joint PJIs occur significantly earlier and are more likely to be caused by the same bacteria as the index PJI.Cite this article: Bone Joint J 2023;105-B(3):294–300.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
Більше джерел

Дисертації з теми "Periprosthetic joint infections"

1

Zajonz, Dirk, Almut Zieme, Torsten Prietzel, et al. "Periprosthetic joint infections in modular endoprostheses of the lower extremities." Universitätsbibliothek Leipzig, 2016. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:15-qucosa-206184.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Background: Modular mega-endoprosthesis systems are used to bridge very large bone defects and have become a widespread method in orthopaedic surgery for the treatment of tumours and revision arthroplasty. However, the indications for the use of modular mega-endoprostheses must be carefully considered. Implanting modular endoprostheses requires major, complication-prone surgery in which the limited salvage procedures should always be borne in mind. The management of periprosthetic infection is particularly difficult and beset with problems. Given this, the present study was designed to gauge the significance of periprosthetic infections in connection with modular mega-implants in the lower extremities among our own patients. Methods: Patients who had been fitted with modular endoprosthesis on a lower extremity at our department between September 1994 and December 2011 were examined retrospectively. A total of 101 patients with 114 modular prostheses were identified. Comprising 30 men (29.7 %) and 71 women (70.3 %), their average age at the time of surgery was 67 years (18–92 years). Results: The average follow-up period was 27 months (5 months and 2 weeks to 14 years and 11 months) and the drop-out rate was about 8.8 %. Altogether, there were 19 (17.7 %) endoprosthesis infections: 3 early infections and 16 late or delayed infections. The pathogen spectrum was dominated by coagulase-negative staphylococci (36 %) and Staphylococcus aureus (16 %), including 26 % multi-resistant pathogens. Reinfection occurred in 37 % of cases of infection. Tumours were followed by significantly fewer infections than the other indications. Infections were twice as likely to occur after previous surgery. Conclusion: In our findings modular endoprostheses (18 %) are much more susceptible to infection than primary endoprostheses (0.5–2,5 %). Infection is the most common complication alongside the dislocation of proximal femur endoprostheses. Consistent, radical surgery is essential – although even with an adequate treatment strategy, the recurrence rate is very high. Unfortunately, the functional results are frequently unsatisfactory, with amputation often being the last resort. Therefore, the indication for implantation must be carefully considered and discussed in great detail, especially in the case of multimorbid patients with previous joint infections.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

Schwetlick, Jan [Verfasser]. "Analysis of the epidemiology and therapy of periprosthetic joint infections of total hip- and knee arthroplasty : a retro- and prospective study on „Klinikum im Friedrichshain, Berlin“ 2010 - 2015 / Jan Schwetlick." Berlin : Medizinische Fakultät Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 2019. http://d-nb.info/1180388275/34.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
3

Li, Cheng [Verfasser]. "Evaluation of periprosthetic joint infection using bibliometric and meta-analysis / Cheng Li." Berlin : Medizinische Fakultät Charité - Universitätsmedizin Berlin, 2021. http://d-nb.info/1241541175/34.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
4

Jansen, Philipp [Verfasser], Benita [Akademischer Betreuer] Hermanns-Sachweh, and Björn [Akademischer Betreuer] Rath. "Endoglin (CD105) expression differentiates between aseptic loosening and periprosthetic joint infection after total joint arthroplasty / Philipp Jansen ; Benita Hermanns-Sachweh, Björn Rath." Aachen : Universitätsbibliothek der RWTH Aachen, 2016. http://d-nb.info/1128731142/34.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
5

Biewald, Philipp [Verfasser], Carl [Akademischer Betreuer] Haasper, and Nael [Akademischer Betreuer] Hawi. "Midterm results after tantalum cones in 1-stage knee exchange for periprosthetic joint infection : a single-center study / Philipp Biewald ; Akademische Betreuer: Carl Haasper, Nael Hawi ; HELIOS ENDO-Klinik Hamburg." Hannover : Bibliothek der Medizinischen Hochschule Hannover, 2021. http://d-nb.info/123675834X/34.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
6

Lobo, André Alves Moreno Sampaio. "Novel method for prevention of periprosthetic joint infections : chitosan and hydroxyapatite composite in paste form." Master's thesis, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/10400.14/32940.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Periprosthetic joint infections are one of the leading challenges in the orthopedic field today. This specific type of infection surrounds bone’s prosthesis and the tissues adjacent to it, occurring mainly when a total joint arthroplasty is performed. When successful, this joint replacement provides pain relief and restores function and independence to the body, improving the patients’ quality of life. The full dynamic of these infections is still unclear, but as the number of joint arthroplasties keeps rising due to the aging population, so does the incidence of infections. The selection of materials to interact with hard tissues, such as bone, must possess two essential characteristics for the proper healing of the tissue surrounding the material, which are osteoconduction and osteoinduction. Osteoconduction is the ability of bone to grow on a surface, in this case, the material’s surface. Osteoinduction is the process of inducing new bone formation, also known as osteogenesis, by the mobilization of immature and undifferentiated cells, differentiating them into pre-osteoblasts. Currently, calcium phosphate ceramics, such as hydroxyapatite (HAp), are promising substitutes for large orthopedic defects’ remodeling and regeneration. This biomaterial presents osteoconductive and osteoinductive properties. However, pure HAp is a material that can be limited by its brittleness, low fracture toughness, bad tensile strength and poor wear resistance. A lot of effort has been put into modifying HAp with the use of polymers in order to enhance its clinical applications. The polymer used in this work was chitosan, which possesses an intrinsic antimicrobial nature, it is biodegradable and biocompatible, and it can be molded into all sorts of structures. This biocomposite was tested in L929 fibroblast cells in other to assess the toxicity of the material. Besides that, the paste was tested in a pre-osteoblastic cell line (MC3T3) by several techniques, to determine the differentiation, proliferation, and calcium production of the cells when in contact with the biocomposite. This work presents a new biocomposite that should have the appropriate characteristics, not only to promote faster regeneration of the bone defect, but also to reduce the incidence rate of periprosthetic joint infections, through the antimicrobial properties of chitosan.<br>Atualmente, as infeções articulares periprostéticas são um dos principais desafios no campo ortopédico. Este tipo específico de infeção que envolve a prótese óssea e os tecidos adjacentes ocorre principalmente após uma artroplastia total da articulação. Quando bem-sucedidas, estas substituições articulares proporcionam alívio da dor, restauram a função e a independência do corpo, melhorando assim a qualidade de vida do paciente. Ainda não é claro como estas infeções se estabelecem, no entanto como o número de artroplastias continua a aumentar, devido ao envelhecimento populacional, a incidência destas infeções também continua a aumentar. Na escolha dos materiais para interagir com tecidos duros como o osso, existem duas características inerentes a esses materiais que devem estar presentes, que são a osteocondução e a osteoindução. A osteocondução é a capacidade de o osso crescer numa superfície, neste caso, na superfície dos materiais, e a osteoindução é o processo que induz a formação de osso novo, também conhecido como osteogénese, mobilizando células imaturas e diferenciando-as em pré-osteoblastos. Atualmente, os cerâmicos de fosfato de cálcio, como a hidroxiapatite (HAp), são substitutos promissores para a remodelação e regeneração de defeitos ortopédicos. Este biomaterial apresenta osteoconductividade e osteoindutividade. No entanto, a HAp pura é um material que pode ser limitado pela sua fragilidade, baixa resistência a fraturas, à tração e ao desgaste. Tem sido feito um grande esforço para modificar HAp com polímeros, a fim de melhorar as suas aplicações clínicas. O polímero utilizado neste trabalho foi o quitosano, que possui propriedades antimicrobianas intrínsecas, é biodegradável e biocompatível e pode ser moldado em vários tipos de estruturas. Este biocompósito foi testado com a linha celular de fibroblastos L929, com o objetivo de inferir sobre a toxicidade do material. Para além disso, o biocompósito foi testada em células de uma linha pré-osteoblástica (MC3T3) através de várias técnicas, de forma a determinar a diferenciação, proliferação e produção de cálcio das células em contacto com o composito. Este trabalho apresenta um novo biocompósito que deve ter as características necessárias para, não só promover uma regeneração mais rápida de defeitos ósseos, mas também ser capaz de reduzir a taxa de incidência de infeções articulares periprotéticas, graças às propriedades antimicrobianas do quitosano.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Книги з теми "Periprosthetic joint infections"

1

Kendoff, Daniel, Rhidian Morgan-Jones, and Fares S. Haddad, eds. Periprosthetic Joint Infections. Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30091-7.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

Parvizi, Javad, and Bryan D. Springer. Periprosthetic joint infection of the hip and knee. Springer, 2014.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
3

Kühn, Klaus-Dieter, ed. Management of Periprosthetic Joint Infection. Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-54469-3.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
4

Springer, Bryan D., and Javad Parvizi, eds. Periprosthetic Joint Infection of the Hip and Knee. Springer New York, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-1-4614-7928-4.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
5

Haddad, Fares S., Daniel Kendoff, and Rhidian Morgan-Jones. Periprosthetic Joint Infections: Changing Paradigms. Springer, 2018.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
6

Haddad, Fares S., Daniel Kendoff, and Rhidian Morgan-Jones. Periprosthetic Joint Infections: Changing Paradigms. Springer London, Limited, 2016.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
7

Haddad, Fares S., Daniel Kendoff, and Rhidian Morgan-Jones. Periprosthetic Joint Infections: Changing Paradigms. Springer, 2016.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
8

Management of Periprosthetic Joint Infections (PJIs). Elsevier, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/c2014-0-02112-0.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
9

Geurts, Jan, and J. J. Chris Arts. Management of Periprosthetic Joint Infections (PJIs). Elsevier Science & Technology, 2016.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
10

Arts, J. J. Chris, and Jan Guerts. Management of Periprosthetic Joint Infections (PJIs). Elsevier Science & Technology, 2016.

Знайти повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
Більше джерел

Частини книг з теми "Periprosthetic joint infections"

1

Malizos, Konstantinos N., and Klaus Kirketerp-Møller. "Incidence and Socioeconomic Impact of Bone and Joint Infections (BJIs): The European Perspective." In Periprosthetic Joint Infections. Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30091-7_1.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

El-Husseiny, Moataz. "Local Antibiotic Therapy: Non–cement-based Antibiotic Delivery Methods." In Periprosthetic Joint Infections. Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30091-7_10.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
3

Konan, Sujith, David A. George, Vaibhav Punjabi, and Fares S. Haddad. "Acute Infections: Irrigation and Debridement with Implant Retention." In Periprosthetic Joint Infections. Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30091-7_11.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
4

Kendoff, Daniel, Akos Zahar, and Thorsten Gehrke. "One-Stage Approach with Cement." In Periprosthetic Joint Infections. Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30091-7_12.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
5

Winkler, Heinz, and Peter Haiden. "Infections of the Hip Joint: One-Stage Approach Without Cement." In Periprosthetic Joint Infections. Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30091-7_13.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
6

Harrison, Tim, and Ian Stockley. "Late Infections: Two-Stage Traditional Solution." In Periprosthetic Joint Infections. Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30091-7_14.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
7

Sandiford, N. Amir, Donald Garbuz, Bassam Masri, and Clive P. Duncan. "Management of Periprosthetic Infection Following Hip Arthroplasty in Two Stages Using an Articulating Antibiotic-Loaded Spacer." In Periprosthetic Joint Infections. Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30091-7_15.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
8

Konan, Sujith, and Fares S. Haddad. "Late Infections: Algorithm Approach." In Periprosthetic Joint Infections. Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30091-7_16.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
9

Garvin, Kevin L., Beau S. Konigsberg, and Curtis W. Hartman. "Late Infections of the Hip Joint: Resection Arthroplasty and Other Solutions." In Periprosthetic Joint Infections. Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30091-7_17.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
10

Antoci, Valentin, Hany Bedair, and Craig J. Della Valle. "Acute Periprosthetic Joint Infections: Diagnostic Considerations." In Periprosthetic Joint Infections. Springer International Publishing, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-30091-7_18.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Тези доповідей конференцій з теми "Periprosthetic joint infections"

1

Gandotra, Rishabh, Hung-Bin Wu, Feng-Chih Kuo, Mel S. Lee, and Gwo-Bin Lee. "A Novel One-aptamer-one-antibody Assay for Detection of Alpha Defensins HNP 1-3 in Synovial Fluid for Diagnosis of Periprosthetic Joint Infections." In 2024 IEEE 19th International Conference on Nano/Micro Engineered and Molecular Systems (NEMS). IEEE, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/nems60219.2024.10639914.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

Fuchs, Michael, Sven Geissler, Janine Mikutta, et al. "Soluble Pecam-1 As Biomarker In Periprosthetic Joint Infections (PJI)." In Deutscher Kongress für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie. Georg Thieme Verlag KG, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1717359.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
3

Chang, Wen-Hsin, Chih-Hung Wang, Sung-Yi Yang, et al. "An integrated microfluidic system for rapid isolation and detection of live bacteria in periprosthetic joint infections." In 2014 IEEE 27th International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS). IEEE, 2014. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/memsys.2014.6765559.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
4

Alunni Cardinali, Martina, Marco Govoni, Sara Stefani, et al. "A multi-spectroscopic approach based on Raman microspectroscopy and ATR-FTIR spectroscopy to investigate Staphylococcus aureus-induced osteomyelitis and periprosthetic joint infections." In Biomedical Spectroscopy, Microscopy, and Imaging III, edited by Jürgen Popp and Csilla Gergely. SPIE, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1117/12.3022328.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
5

Gandotra, Rishabh, Feng-Chih Kuo, Mel S. Lee, and Gwo-Bin Lee. "A Paper-Based Dual Aptamer Assay on an Integrated Microfluidic System for Detection of HNP 1 as a Biomarker for Periprosthetic Joint Infections." In 2023 IEEE 36th International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS). IEEE, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/mems49605.2023.10052430.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
6

Mizuki, S., S. Ishibashi, T. Tsuji, K. Mishima, and K. Kodama. "POS0706 CLINICAL USEFULNESS OF POLYMERASE CHAIN REACTION-LATERAL FLOW FOR THE DIAGNOSIS AND MANAGEMENT OF PERIPROSTHETIC JOINT INFECTIONS IN RHEUMATOID ARTHRITIS PATIENTS AT RISK FOR BACTERIAL CULTURE-NEGATIVE." In EULAR 2024 European Congress of Rheumatology, 12-15 June. Vienna, Austria. BMJ Publishing Group Ltd and European League Against Rheumatism, 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1136/annrheumdis-2024-eular.1534.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
7

Jiang, Jiaxin, Krithika Sureshkumar, Chandrashekhar Choudhary, et al. "A PASSIVE WIRELESS DIFFERENTIAL SENSOR FOR IN-SITU EARLY DETECTION OF PERIPROSTHETIC JOINT INFECTION." In 2022 Solid-State, Actuators, and Microsystems Workshop. Transducer Research Foundation, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.31438/trf.hh2022.1.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
8

Klasan, A., A. Schermuksnies, F. Gerber, D. Malcherczyk, S. Fuchs-Winkelmann, and TJ Heyse. "The role of vancomycin in increasing antibiotic resistance in periprosthetic joint infection after total knee arthroplasty." In Deutscher Kongress für Orthopädie und Unfallchirurgie. Georg Thieme Verlag KG, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1055/s-0040-1717416.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
9

Jiang, Jiaxin, Cole Napier, Chandrashekhar Choudhary, et al. "An Implantable Differential Sensor with Passive Wireless Interrogation for In-Situ Early Detection of Periprosthetic Joint Infection." In 2023 IEEE 36th International Conference on Micro Electro Mechanical Systems (MEMS). IEEE, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/mems49605.2023.10052594.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Звіти організацій з теми "Periprosthetic joint infections"

1

A. Komnos, Georgios, Antonios Papadopoulos, Efstratios Athanaselis, Theofilos Karachalios, and Sokratis E. Varitimidis. Migrating Periprosthetic Infection from a Total Hip Replacement to a Contralateral Non-Operated Osteoarthritic Knee Joint. Science Repository, 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.31487/j.ijscr.2022.03.02.

Повний текст джерела
Анотація:
Introduction: There is a paucity of published data on whether a treated infected arthroplasty is a risk factor for infection in another, non-operated joint. Contamination of a primary, arthritic, non-operated joint from an infected arthroplasty is a relatively rare entity. Case: We report a case of migration of a pathogen (Enterococcus faecalis) from an infected prosthetic joint (hip) to the contralateral native joint (knee). Identification of the pathogen was made with PCR, by obtaining cultures during the implantation of the primary knee prosthesis. Conclusion: Contamination of a primary, arthritic, non-operated joint from an infected arthroplasty has not been widely reported. Management of such cases is extremely challenging and without clear and established guidelines. Our experience shows that tissue samples should be taken intraoperatively and sent for cultures, so as to exclude contamination in those cases.
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
2

Wang, Huhu, Jiaming He, Shuai Ding, Qiaolong Hu, and Ting Fu. Diagnostic Accuracy of neutrophil gelatinase-associated lipocalin (NGAL) in Periprosthetic Joint Infection: A Meta-analysis. INPLASY - International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.37766/inplasy2022.12.0098.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
3

Li, Zhizhuo, Chengxin Li, guangxue Wang, et al. Diagnostic accuracy of synovial fluid D-lactate for periprosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. INPLASY - International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.37766/inplasy2021.9.0036.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
4

WANG, Huhu, Ting FU, and Hongwei LI. Diagnostic accuracy of globulin and albumin to globulin ratio for periprosthetic joint infection: a systematic review and meta-analysis. INPLASY - International Platform of Registered Systematic Review and Meta-analysis Protocols, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.37766/inplasy2022.11.0028.

Повний текст джерела
Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.
Ми пропонуємо знижки на всі преміум-плани для авторів, чиї праці увійшли до тематичних добірок літератури. Зв'яжіться з нами, щоб отримати унікальний промокод!

До бібліографії