Увійти

Готові списки джерел за темами / Physician-rating websites

Добірка наукової літератури з теми "Physician-rating websites"

Автор: Grafiati

Опубліковано: 10 січня 2023

Оновлено: 29 січня 2023

Оформте джерело за APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard та іншими стилями

Оберіть тип джерела:

Ознайомтеся зі списками актуальних статей, книг, дисертацій, тез та інших наукових джерел на тему "Physician-rating websites".

Біля кожної праці в переліку літератури доступна кнопка «Додати до бібліографії». Скористайтеся нею – і ми автоматично оформимо бібліографічне посилання на обрану працю в потрібному вам стилі цитування: APA, MLA, «Гарвард», «Чикаго», «Ванкувер» тощо.

Також ви можете завантажити повний текст наукової публікації у форматі «.pdf» та прочитати онлайн анотацію до роботи, якщо відповідні параметри наявні в метаданих.

Зміст

Статті в журналах
Дисертації
Частини книг
Тези доповідей конференцій

Статті в журналах з теми "Physician-rating websites":

1

Lagu, Tara, Katherine Metayer, Michael Moran, Leidy Ortiz, Aruna Priya, Sarah L. Goff, and Peter K. Lindenauer. "Website Characteristics and Physician Reviews on Commercial Physician-Rating Websites." JAMA 317, no. 7 (February 21, 2017): 766. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.2016.18553.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

2

Hofmeister, Martin. "Use physician-rating websites with caution." Canadian Medical Association Journal 190, no. 29 (July 22, 2018): E892. http://dx.doi.org/10.1503/cmaj.69475.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

3

Zilber,, Claire. "An Ethical Response to Physician-Rating Websites." Psychiatric News 52, no. 21 (November 3, 2017): 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1176/appi.pn.2017.10b21.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

4

Malige, Ajith, and Kristofer S. Matullo. "The Influence of Physician-Rating Websites on Patient Physician Preference." Clinics in Orthopedic Surgery 12, no. 2 (2020): 238. http://dx.doi.org/10.4055/cios19103.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

5

Gordon, Howard S. "Consider Embracing the Reviews from Physician Rating Websites." Journal of General Internal Medicine 32, no. 6 (March 15, 2017): 599–600. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11606-017-4036-8.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

6

Mulgund, Pavankumar, Raj Sharman, Priya Anand, Shashank Shekhar, and Priya Karadi. "Data Quality Issues With Physician-Rating Websites: Systematic Review." Journal of Medical Internet Research 22, no. 9 (September 28, 2020): e15916. http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/15916.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Background In recent years, online physician-rating websites have become prominent and exert considerable influence on patients’ decisions. However, the quality of these decisions depends on the quality of data that these systems collect. Thus, there is a need to examine the various data quality issues with physician-rating websites. Objective This study’s objective was to identify and categorize the data quality issues afflicting physician-rating websites by reviewing the literature on online patient-reported physician ratings and reviews. Methods We performed a systematic literature search in ACM Digital Library, EBSCO, Springer, PubMed, and Google Scholar. The search was limited to quantitative, qualitative, and mixed-method papers published in the English language from 2001 to 2020. Results A total of 423 articles were screened. From these, 49 papers describing 18 unique data quality issues afflicting physician-rating websites were included. Using a data quality framework, we classified these issues into the following four categories: intrinsic, contextual, representational, and accessible. Among the papers, 53% (26/49) reported intrinsic data quality errors, 61% (30/49) highlighted contextual data quality issues, 8% (4/49) discussed representational data quality issues, and 27% (13/49) emphasized accessibility data quality. More than half the papers discussed multiple categories of data quality issues. Conclusions The results from this review demonstrate the presence of a range of data quality issues. While intrinsic and contextual factors have been well-researched, accessibility and representational issues warrant more attention from researchers, as well as practitioners. In particular, representational factors, such as the impact of inline advertisements and the positioning of positive reviews on the first few pages, are usually deliberate and result from the business model of physician-rating websites. The impact of these factors on data quality has not been addressed adequately and requires further investigation.

7

Emmert, Martin, Uwe Sander, and Frank Pisch. "Eight Questions About Physician-Rating Websites: A Systematic Review." Journal of Medical Internet Research 15, no. 2 (February 1, 2013): e24. http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.2360.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

8

Gilbert, Kirven, C. Matthew Hawkins, Danny R. Hughes, Kishen Patel, Navdeep Gogia, Aarti Sekhar, and Richard Duszak. "Physician Rating Websites: Do Radiologists Have an Online Presence?" Journal of the American College of Radiology 12, no. 8 (August 2015): 867–71. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jacr.2015.03.039.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

9

Terlutter, Ralf, Sonja Bidmon, and Johanna Röttl. "Who Uses Physician-Rating Websites? Differences in Sociodemographic Variables, Psychographic Variables, and Health Status of Users and Nonusers of Physician-Rating Websites." Journal of Medical Internet Research 16, no. 3 (March 31, 2014): e97. http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/jmir.3145.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

10

Han, Xi, Bei Li, Tingting Zhang, and Jiabin Qu. "Factors Associated With the Actual Behavior and Intention of Rating Physicians on Physician Rating Websites: Cross-Sectional Study." Journal of Medical Internet Research 22, no. 6 (June 4, 2020): e14417. http://dx.doi.org/10.2196/14417.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Background Although online physician rating information is popular among Chinese health consumers, the limited number of reviews greatly hampers the effective usage of this information. To date, little has been discussed on the variables that influence online physician rating from the users’ perspective. Objective This study aims to investigate the factors associated with the actual behavior and intention of generating online physician rating information in urban China. Methods A web-based cross-sectional survey was conducted, and the valid responses of 1371 Chinese health consumers were recorded. Using a pilot interview, we analyzed the effects of demographics, health variables, cognitive variables, and technology-related variables on online physician rating information generation. Binary multivariate logistic regression, multiple linear regression, one-way analysis of variance analyses, and independent samples t test were performed to analyze the rating behavior and the intentions of the health consumers. The survey instrument was designed based on the existing literature and the pilot interview. Results In this survey, 56.7% (778/1371) of the responders used online physician rating information, and 20.9% (287/1371) of the responders rated the physicians on the physician rating website at least once (posters). The actual physician rating behavior was mainly predicted by health-related factors and was significantly associated with seeking web-based physician information (odds ratio [OR] 5.548, 95% CI 3.072-10.017; P<.001), usage of web-based physician service (OR 2.771, 95% CI 1.979-3.879; P<.001), health information-seeking ability (OR 1.138, 95% CI 0.993-1.304; P=.04), serious disease development (OR 2.699, 95% CI 1.889-3.856; P<.001), good medical experience (OR 2.149, 95% CI 1.473-3.135; P<.001), altruism (OR 0.612, 95% CI 0.483-0.774; P<.001), self-efficacy (OR 1.453, 95% CI 1.182-1.787; P<.001), and trust in online physician rating information (OR 1.315, 95% CI 1.089-1.586; P=.004). Some factors influencing the intentions of the posters and nonposters rating the physicians were different, and the rating intention was mainly determined by cognitive and health-related factors. For posters, seeking web-based physician information (β=.486; P=.007), using web-based medical service (β=.420; P=.002), ability to seek health information (β=.193; P=.002), rating habits (β=.105; P=.02), altruism (β=.414; P<.001), self-efficacy (β=.102; P=.06), trust (β=.351; P<.001), and perceived ease of use (β=.275; P<.001) served as significant predictors of the rating intention. For nonposters, ability to seek health information (β=.077; P=.003), chronic disease development (β=.092; P=.06), bad medical experience (β=.047; P=.02), rating habits (β=.085; P<.001), altruism (β=.411; P<.001), self-efficacy (β=.171; P<.001), trust (β=.252; P<.001), and perceived usefulness of rating physicians (β=.109; P<.001) were significantly associated with the rating intention. Conclusions We showed that different factors affected the physician rating behavior and rating intention. Health-related variables influenced the physician rating behavior, while cognitive variables were critical in the rating intentions. We have proposed some practical implications for physician rating websites and physicians to promote online physician rating information generation.

Більше джерел

Дисертації з теми "Physician-rating websites":

1

Ulpiano, Renato. "Adopting Physician-Rating Websites: Assessing the Influence of Practitioners’ Motivations and System Perceptions." Thesis, 2021. https://vuir.vu.edu.au/43687/.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

Physician-rating websites (PRWs) are internet-based platforms that allow users to read or contribute to reviews of service performance about healthcare practitioners (HCPs). Healthcare consumers use PRWs to rate healthcare services; however, PRWs are not commonly embraced by HCPs, nor by professional associations. Nonetheless, in a competitive environment, HCPs could benefit their practice by attending to what clients publicly communicate about their services to align with the patient centred care (PCC) movement. The systematic literature review (SLR) revealed a paucity of research in the area. This research sought to understand what influences a HCP’s intention to adopt a PRW. In doing so, this research explored the relationship between HCPs’ motivation to adopt such websites and the role of their perceptions of a PRW’s characteristics. The motivation and system elements were assessed in terms of their relative influence on HCPs’ PRW adoption. This research conducted a narrative and SLR to inform a conceptual model to theoretically explain the relationship between motivation, system characteristics, and intention to adopt a PRW that was tested in a cross-sectional study. The research method and methodology included participants, 249 Australian allied healthcare professionals, who were surveyed using validated scales. Structural equation modelling estimated the model and the relative contribution of motivation and system characteristics on the adoption of PRWs. The Results chapter showed that HCPs’ motivation type external regulation—social had a direct negative effect on their intention to adopt a PRW (r = −.21, p < 0.01). In discussing the findings, they contrasted with the perceived system characteristics of relative advantage and ease of use, which were found to have a direct positive effect on intention to adopt a PRW (r = .88, p < .00) and (r = .24, p < .00), respectively. In conclusion, the results from this study, first, increase current understanding of HCP behavioural intention to adopt a PRW. Second, theoretical contributions are made through the integration of self-determination theory and diffusion of innovation applied to this unique context. Third, this study is the first to apply the Multidimensional Work Motivation Scale in Australia. The findings have implications for healthcare businesses and HCPs’ strategic development of PCC measures. Furthermore, translation of the findings could assist in the design of HCPs’ professional development to use online feedback, to manage patient onboarding, and to identify pathways to innovation adoption by HCPs.

Частини книг з теми "Physician-rating websites":

1

Taffet, George E. "Hospital and Physician Rating Websites: Ethical Challenges Without Context." In Ethical Considerations and Challenges in Geriatrics, 137–45. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-44084-2_12.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

2

Bidmon, Sonja. "Patient Satisfaction with the Primary Care Physician and Usage of Physician Rating Websites: How Do They Relate to Each Other?" In European Advertising Academy, 15–28. Wiesbaden: Springer Fachmedien Wiesbaden, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-658-24878-9_2.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

3

Bäumer, Frederik S., Joschka Kersting, Vytautas Kuršelis, and Michaela Geierhos. "Rate Your Physician: Findings from a Lithuanian Physician Rating Website." In Communications in Computer and Information Science, 43–58. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-99972-2_4.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

4

Kerisit, Erwan, Bertrand Legrand, Matthieu Calafiore, Michaël Rochoy, Emmanuel Chazard, Romaric Marcilly, and Antoine Lamer. "Awareness and Perception of Google® Reviews Among French GPs." In MEDINFO 2021: One World, One Health – Global Partnership for Digital Innovation. IOS Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.3233/shti220296.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

Анотація:

The objective of this study was to assess the perception of French general practitioners (GPs) and the impact of the Google® online physician rating system. We questioned the French GPs with a self-administered questionnaire. A total of 412 GPs had answered the complete questionnaire. 83.25% of respondents did not validate the relevance of the physician rating websites. The most decried limitations were the lack of validity of these opinions and the negative impact on physicians.

Тези доповідей конференцій з теми "Physician-rating websites":

1

Kordzadeh, Nima. "An Empirical Examination of Factors Influencing the Intention to Use Physician Rating Websites." In Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.24251/hicss.2019.525.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

2

Mamonov, Stanislav. "Blowing the Whistle on Opioid Overprescription: Insights from Patient Feedback on Physician Rating Websites." In Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.24251/hicss.2021.478.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.

3

Haug, Maximilian, and Heiko Gewald. "Why Do I Rate? - Shedding Light on the Factors Influencing the Participation on Physician Rating Websites." In Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences. Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.24251/hicss.2019.526.

Повний текст джерела

Стилі APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO та ін.