Academic literature on the topic '主谓谓语句'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic '主谓谓语句.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "主谓谓语句"

1

Xiong, Zhongru. "A semantic-syntactic analysis of Chao's sentences with a verbal subject and a nominal predicate (in Chinese)." Journal of Chinese Linguistics 51, no. 3 (2023): 656–91. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jcl.2023.a911855.

Full text
Abstract:
摘要: 子句可以分成题元层、形态层与话语层,这三层可用来定义逻辑主语、语法主语与心理主语(话题)等三种主语。话题化为 A'-移位,涉及论元与附加语,对赵氏"动主名谓句"来说,就是标补子句与状语子句充当话题。标补子句是谓词的论元,可提升为语法主语与话题,如"不下雨已经三个月了"中的"不下雨";状语子句是句子的附加语,不能充当语法主语,但可提升为话题,如"逃孱头"中的"逃"。汉语时制范畴缺乏形态,允许空主语,也不需要动词性宿主。前者使得汉语子句可以以动词或动词短语的形式呈现,如"谁逃"呈现为"pro 逃";后者使得汉语名词性短语可以不借助系词充当谓语,如"谁是孱头"呈现为"谁孱头"。两者的合力产生了赵氏"动主名谓句",如" pro 逃 pro 孱头"。赵氏"动主名谓句"对普遍原则不构成挑战,它的存在跟汉语时制范畴的特征相关。 ABSTRACT: The clause can be divided into three layers: the thematic layer, the inflectional layer and the discourse layer, within which there exist the corresponding logical subject, grammatical subject and psychological subject. Topi
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Yanggah, Minny Elisa. "印尼语形容词充当谓语的句法特征分析". Journal International Lingua Mandarin (JILIN) 1, № 1 (2021): 28. http://dx.doi.org/10.26418/jilin.v1i1.46599.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Kuralova, Jansoya Turg'un qizi. "汉语句式教学要点与策略 KEY POINTS AND STRATEGIES OF CHINESE SENTENCE TEACHING". Oriental Renaissance: Innovative, educational, natural and social sciences 2, № 26 (2022): 124–29. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.7333868.

Full text
Abstract:
<em>This chapter first uses a section to briefly introduce seven common sentence patterns - continuous verb sentence, concurrent sentence, subject predicate predicate sentence, double object sentence, can wish verb sentence, bei sentence, &quot;lian&quot; sentence, etc. As the three sentence patterns of existential sentence, &quot;bi&quot; sentence and &quot;ba&quot; sentence are used frequently in daily language, their structural and functional characteristics are also significant, and learners have a high probability of error, they are separated into one section as the key part of this chapt
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Liu, Feng-hsi. "Abstracts of the English papers in Chinese." Chinese as a Second Language Research 4, no. 1 (2015): 67–68. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/caslar-2015-0004.

Full text
Abstract:
Acquiring Topic Structures in Mandarin Chinese前人认为汉语的主题结构,尤其是未经过移位产生的基本式结构,对以英语为母语的汉语学习者构成极大困难,只有当学习者达到最高水平时才能掌握。袁(1995)提出假设认为汉语学习者在初,中阶段可能无法在结构上加上主题节点,因此倾向于将句子主题分析为主语。本文针对此一假设进行测试,查看初,中阶汉语学习者是否有能力在主谓结构上加建主题节点。学习者对不同的主题结构进行合法度判断,结果显示对于某些主题结构初阶者的判断和母语为汉语者的判断并无不同。此一结果表示汉语学习者在初阶即有能力在主谓结构上加建结构。
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Tian, Qianzi, and Jackson T. S. Sun. "Verbal complementation in Dgebshes Horpa." Journal of Chinese Linguistics 53, no. 2 (2025): 410–44. https://doi.org/10.1353/jcl.2025.a963402.

Full text
Abstract:
摘要: 本文深入探讨汉藏语系格西霍尔语补语构造的性质及类型特征。格西 话的补语构造运用多种真性补语句与补语策略连结语义上的主要及 附属命题,不同结构的选择取决于主要及附属命题谓语间的语义整合 度。整合度越高,越倾向使用偏离独立语句的补语句或单句式的补语 策略。比较证据显示,格西话补语构造的两项类型特征"形式多样性 强"与"结构包蕴性弱"可能均与藏语长期接触的影响有关。 ABSTRACT: This paper analyzes the structures and typology of verbal complementation in the Dgebshes variety of Central Horpa (Sino-Tibetan). Dgebshes employs multiple types of complement clauses and complementation strategies to relate a primary state of affairs with a secondary state of affairs. Selection of complementation structures is determined to a large extent by the degree of semantic integration betwee
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

陈, 刚. "从形容词看现代汉语词类系统的主要特征". Chinese as a Second Language Research 2, № 2 (2013): 267–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/caslar-2013-0034.

Full text
Abstract:
提要跨语言的调查表明,和其他主要词类相比形容词的词类问题最为复杂。现代汉语形容词词类身份尚存较大争议。本文以名、动、形、副为词类研究框架,认为现代汉语的形容词是个柔性程度很高的词类,它与其他主要词类之间存在两种包含关系,即词类包含和功能包含,这些都为解释形容词的句法功能提供新的启示。此外,从名、动、形的重叠能力来看,汉语首先区分的是大名词和状词,而且这两者都具有指称性,因此汉语中体词和谓词的区别并不显得那么重要。
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

刘承峰 та 黄颖. "现代汉语的主观量标记 “基本”". Chinese as a Second Language Research 11, № 2 (2022): 313–34. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/caslar-2022-2005.

Full text
Abstract:
提 要 现代汉语副词 “基本” 表示量,其语义 “大体上” 基于客观标准这一 “参照量”,量化句子中表 “全量” 的谓词性成分、 “都” 和其前名词性成分,并表征现实量与预期量、标准量之间的关系。 “基本” 可限定客观量,也可限定主观量:前者仅指现实量接近标准 “参照量”; 后者指现实量未达到标准 “参照量”,但言者认为其超过了 “预期量”; 言者对现实量做积极评价,是主观大量类。 “基本” 表征主观量的同时,也体现了言者对事件可能性的判断,是一种认识上的不确定。
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Lu, Zhijie. "The Error and Teaching Strategy of Subject-Predicate Predicate Structure." Journal of China Studies 21, no. 1 (2018): 149–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.20288/jcs.2018.21.1.149.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Ha, Doo-jin. "A Contrastive Study of Chinese Subject -Predicate Sentences and Korean Double-Subject Constructions-." Society Of Korean Language and Literature 81 (January 31, 2025): 485–532. https://doi.org/10.15711/wr.81.0.16.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Xiong, Jiajuan, and Chu-Ren Huang. "Mental state, volition and argument realization." Journal of Chinese Linguistics 52, no. 1 (2024): 106–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/jcl.2024.a919400.

Full text
Abstract:
ABSTRACT: We explore argument realization in the resultative V- de construction under the framework of the Theta System. We find that the theta grids of the resultative V- de construction are of two types, i.e., ([+c-m], [-c]) and ([+cm], [-m]), depending on the (a-)thematic relation between the verb and second/internal argument. Crucially, the external argument always has a /-m feature (the minus value of the mental state), regardless of its animacy, leading to a non-volitional Agent reading (animate) and a Cause reading (inanimate). It is due to this [+c-m] feature cluster that the construct
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!