Academic literature on the topic '市场竞争 Market competition'

The xianggu (shiitake) mushroom industry in Xixia county, Henan, emerged and initially experienced rapid growth during the reform and opening up period. It has benefited from both the rapid expansion of the food consumption market in China and the guidance and support of the local government. After thirty years of sustained expansion, the growth of the mushroom market began to slow down and competition within the industry became fierce. Facing rich and powerful mushroom dealers, individual mushroom farmers have had to bear the brunt of market fluctuations. To break the predicament of farmers’ suffering from low prices (because of the bumper harvest paradox) and to help farmers protect their interests and gain a fair share of the industry’s profits, and thus to achieve sustained and healthy development of the mushroom industry, important institutional innovations are needed. 西峡县香菇产业在改革开放时期经历了从零开始的飞速增长，这既得益于食品消费市场的迅速扩张，也得益于地方政府的引导和扶持。在经历了三十年的持续扩张后，香菇市场增速开始放缓，业内竞争压力凸显。面对财大气粗的菇行，势孤力单的个体菇农首当其冲,受到市场的挤压。要破解菇贱伤农的困局，帮助菇农保护自己的利益和分享产业的利润，并实现香菇产业的健康持续发展，就需要在产业组织和制度上进行创新。 (This article is in English.)

Non-governmental organisations (NGOs) have been the major provider of social welfare services in Hong Kong. Facing an economic downturn, the Hong Kong government decides to enhance cost-effectiveness and accountability in social service through the introduction of market values and business management practices. Market-oriented practices include contracting out, competitive bidding, performance monitoring and lump-sum grant. The appeal of these practices lies in the possibility of lowering costs, but their long-term effect on quality and stability of services is largely uncertain. With the emergence of competition and deregulation in social welfare, NGOs have to face formidable challenges to change their traditional philosophies and mode of operations. The reform implicates the redefinition of the relationship between the government and NGOs, and between social workers and their NGO employers. This paper points out the need to adopt a cautious and consensus approach to introduce welfare reforms. 非政府机构为香港社会福利的最大提供者。 面对经济不景， 香港政府决定引入市场导向和工商管理的措施， 以提高社会服 务的成本效益和问责性。 市场导向的措施包括外判、 投标、 表现监察及一笔过拨款。 这些措施吸引人的地方是可以降 低成本，但长此下去可能影响服务质素和稳定性。 随著出现竞争和取消管制， 非政府机构将要改变其固有的哲学和运作 的方式。 福利改革重新订定政府和非政府机构的关系， 亦改变社工的雇佣的关系。 本文指出在福利改革中， 有需要采 取审慎的态度去寻求共识。

This article demonstrates how the “old agriculture” of grain production operates today mainly by an administrative model, while the “new agriculture” of high-value-added products (high-end vegetables, fruits, meat-poultry-fish, and eggs-milk) operates mainly by a laissez faire market model. The former serves to protect low-value agricultural products from violent market price swings and international competition to ensure China’s “grain security,” but is prone to a commandist approach that can disregard peasant interests and wishes. The latter has stimulated peasant initiatives through market incentives, but suffers from violent price fluctuations and merchant extractions. A third model, “specialty co-ops,” has thus far been guided by a mistaken model of trying to imitate U.S. co-ops, which are purely economic entities, to the disregard of Chinese village communities. This article urges the adoption of an “East Asian” model of semi-governmental, integrated co-ops based on peasant communities (villages), extending from there up through the governmental hierarchy of townships, counties, provinces, and the central levels. Such co-ops provide “vertical integration” (processing and marketing) services for small-peasant agricultural products, offer technical assistance, organize the purchase and supply of agricultural inputs, extend credit services, engage in community activities, and see to peasant social-political interests, as was done so successfully in Japan-Korea-Taiwan, most especially during the period when their per capita GDP and relative proportions of industry and agriculture stood at levels roughly comparable to China’s today. 本文论证,中国的“旧农业”——谷物生产——今天主要运作于一个行政模式之下,而“新农业”——高值蔬菜、水果、肉-禽-鱼和蛋奶——则主要运作于一个放任的市场模式之下。在国际市场竞争和粮食价格相对低廉的压力下,前者起到保护中国谷物生产和“粮食安全”的作用,但也显示倾向过度依赖指令性手段和无视农民意愿的弱点。后者则成功地凭借市场收益激发了小农的创新性,但经常受到市场价格波动的冲击以及商业资本的榨取。作为第三种模式的“专业合作社”,则主要试图模仿美国的纯经济性合作社模式,无视中国村庄，不符合中国实际。本文提倡,中国应该模仿“东亚”模式的半政府性综合农协,扎根于村庄社区、由此往上延伸到乡-镇、县、省、中央各级政府。它们主要为小农提供“纵向一体化”的产品加工和销售服务、技术咨询与服务、信贷服务、组织农资供销、组织社区活动、并参与国家政治来维护小农利益,一如日-韩-台历史经验中,在其人均gdp以及工农业所占相对比例大致相当于如今中国的那段时期。 (This article is in English.)

abstract: 我国金融市场长期以来实行分业经营，但近年我国金融控股公司迅速发展，其体量极其庞大，对金融行业乃至整个经济体系产生系统性影响。随着金融全球化和经济金融化发展，金融业竞争日渐激烈，金融机构间跨行业以及金融集团化经营成为金融市场成熟完善的必然趋势。此外，中美贸易战迫使我国金融业加快开放步伐，意味着国内分业经营的金融机构将面临空前激烈的海外竞争。在内部需求以及外部压力的推动下，亟需提升我国金融机构的竞争力。在促使银行混业经营合规发展的同时，产生了一些问题：混业经营是否可以促进银行的绩效提升？混业经营通过何种渠道来作用于银行绩效？ 本文通过案例分析与实证相结合的方式来解答上述问题。在案例分析部分，分别就银行拓展信托业务和保险业务两个方面展开分析，具体来说，在拓展信托业务方面，以浦发银行收购上海信托为案例分析了浦发银行开拓信托业务后对其经营绩效的影响；在拓展保险业务方面，以北京银行并购首创安泰为例，分析银保混业对北京银行带来的协同效应。在实证分析部分，首先，基于相关的理论以及文献提出三个假说：银行实施混业经营战略，可以提高银行的绩效水平；混业经营通过提高银行规模，增强规模经济优势，促进银行的绩效水平较高；混业经营会提高银行势力水平，从而提升银行的绩效水平。其次，建立回归模型来验证上述三个假说，研究了是否混业以及混业经营的程度对银行绩效的影响。最后，构建中介效应模型验证混业经营作用于银行绩效的渠道，本文主要检验了规模、市场势力两个渠道。 综合上述分析，本文认为混业经营会显著正向影响公司业绩，并且银行势力存在显著的中介传导效应，即银行通过混业经营增加了市场势力、提高了规模经济，从而影响了公司业绩。 案例分析结果支持上述结论，即混业经营会带来银行经营绩效的提升，但是同时也可能会带来短期的风险。 银行是否需要采取混业经营需要根据自身的经营情况，不能盲目扩张。业务的拓展需要与自身现有的业务形成互补，才能实现协同发展效应。在拓展业务的同时，需要注意开拓新的业务是否会给自身带来更多的经营风险。 关键词：混业经营；银行绩效；市场竞争；银行势力
Dissertation/Thesis
Doctoral Dissertation Business Administration 2020