Academic literature on the topic '1812-1836'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic '1812-1836.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "1812-1836"
1
Αργυροπούλου, Ρωξάνη Δ. "Ο «Ελληνικός Τηλέγραφος» (1812-1836)". Gleaner 8 (7 вересня 2016): 31. http://dx.doi.org/10.12681/er.10471.
Full text
2
Núñez Martínez, María. "Las cartas autonómicas de Cuba y Puerto Rico : primer antecedente del estado autonómico." Teoría y Realidad Constitucional, no. 25 (January 1, 2010): 335. http://dx.doi.org/10.5944/trc.25.2010.6898.
Full textAbstract:
Los deseos descentralizadores de Cuba y Puerto Rico se manifiestan por primera vez en los orígenes del Estado Constitucional español, especialmente en los procesos constituyentes de 1812 y 1836; posteriormente, a partir de la segunda mitad del siglo XIX, a los mismos se unirá el objetivo de una autonomía administrativa y política, especialmente en el caso de Cuba. La respuesta del Estado español, tardía siempre, se manifestará mediante las Cartas Autonómicas que conocerán su publicación cuando ya el desarrollo de los acontecimientos hagan inviable dicha solución. No obstante, tal otorgamiento Estatutario o de «Constitución Autonómica», supondrá el primer antecedente de dicho modelo de organización territorial del Estado y acaso, el único aspecto originario del constitucionalismo español.
3
Collins, Kristin A. "“Petitions Without Number”: Widows' Petitions and the Early Nineteenth-Century Origins of Public Marriage-Based Entitlements." Law and History Review 31, no. 1 (2013): 1–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0738248012000727.
Full textAbstract:
In 1858, Catharine Barr wrote to the Pension Commissioner in Washington, D.C., seeking reinstatement of her widow's pension. Barr explained that she had been married to two men who had died in the service of the United States: first to George Bundick, “a young and beloved husband” who had died in the War of 1812; then to William Davidson in 1835, who had died in 1836 of injuries sustained while serving on the USSVandalia. She acknowledged that she was not, strictly speaking, a widow, as her current husband, James Barr, was still living and they were still married. She nevertheless sought reinstatement of the pension she had been granted as Davidson's widow. Pursuant to the terms of the relevant pension statute, Barr's pension had terminated upon her remarriage to James. However, as Barr explained to the commissioner, James “has neither been with me or given me one Dollar for my support since 1849, and I know not his whereabouts.” Having also lost her father in the War of 1812, Barr saw herself as particularly deserving of the federal government's assistance and believed that she and other widows in her position had a claim on the national coffers. “I for one,” she implored, “have no Dependence on Earth only what comes through my relations.”
4
Gootenberg, Paul. "Population and Ethnicity in Early Republican Peru: Some Revisions." Latin American Research Review 26, no. 3 (1991): 109–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0023879100023955.
Full textAbstract:
All numbers on the makeup of Peru's republican population are wrong, the one point on which historians can agree. Peruvian governments had neither the capacity nor the will to mount thorough surveys of their scattered and elusive Andean subjects. Between the late viceregal census of 1791 (reporting a population of 1,076,000) and the first modern effort of 1876 (yielding a count of 2,699,000) lies a century of demographic no man's land, despite partial surveys claimed for 1812, 1836, 1850, and 1862. Unfortunately, historians cannot fly back in time and redo the head counts missed or mismanaged by successive governments, although this miracle has seemingly been worked for the older Incan and conquest periods.1 The best scholars can attempt at this point is to untangle the confusions of existing census documents and bring new evidence to bear on their strengths and weaknesses.
5
Gámiz Gordo, Antonio. "La Mezquita-Catedral de Córdoba. Fuentes gráficas hasta 1850." Al-Qanṭara 40, no. 1 (2019): 135. http://dx.doi.org/10.3989/alqantara.2019.005.
Full textAbstract:
La Mezquita-Catedral de Córdoba cuenta con un rico legado de imágenes hasta la llegada de la fotografía a mediados del XIX que constituyen una destacada fuente documental para la investigación. Tras una amplia labor de rastreo y localización de dichas imágenes, se aportan referencias sobre sus autores, contexto y técnicas, valorando su fiabilidad o precisión gráfica. Las primeras conocidas corresponden a tiempos cristianos, destacando dos panorámicas urbanas de la segunda mitad del XVI, una de ellas objeto de plagios con una notable difusión en Europa. Los primeros planos a escala del monumento conservados son del XVIII y las primeras vistas interiores de finales de ese siglo. En la primera mitad del XIX se produjeron abundantes imágenes de viajeros y artistas, algunas muy bellas y publicadas con gran éxito editorial. Los documentos gráficos reseñados se presentan agrupados según su autoría y orden cronológico: primeras imágenes simbólicas (desde 1360), Wyngaerde (1567), Civitatis (h. 1585-1617), copias del Civitatis (s. XVII-XVIII), Baldi (1668), óleo anónimo (1741), imágenes esquemáticas (s. XVIII), dibujo colección Vázquez Venegas (1752), planos Académicos (1767-1804), Swinburne (1775-1779), Karwinsky y Rillo (1811), Laborde (h. 1800-1812), Murphy (1802-1813), Bacler d’Able (h. 1820), Taylor (h. 1826-1832), Ford (1831), Lewis (1832-1836), Prangey (1832-1837), Gail (h. 1832-37), Roberts (1833-1839), Dauzats (h. 1836-1838), Chapuy (h. 1838-1842), Villaamil (h. 1838-1844), Bossuet (h. 1841-1855), Gerhardt (h. 1849-1851), Guesdon (1853), Parcerisa (1855) y Los Monumentos Arquitectónicos (h. 1852-1881).
6
Ptaszyk, Marian. "Tomasz Ujazdowski 1796–1836 — pedagog, publicysta, wydawca, „starożytnik”, miłośnik książek i zabytków przeszłości, działacz polityczny." Roczniki Biblioteczne 61 (June 4, 2018): 85–133. http://dx.doi.org/10.19195/0080-3626.61.5.
Full textAbstract:
TOMASZ UJAZDOWSKI 1796–1836 — PEDAGOG, PUBLICYSTA, WYDAWCA, „STAROŻYTNIK”, MIŁOŚNIK KSIĄŻEK I ZABYTKÓW PRZESZŁOŚCI, DZIAŁACZ POLITYCZNYBiografia Ujazdowskiego. Pierwsze publikacje. Redagowanie „Pamiętnika Sandomierskiego”.Publicystyka czasu powstania listopadowego „Tandeciarz”. Redagowanie „Rozmaitości Krakowskich”. Pomnik rycerstwa polskiego z wieku XV. Prywatny księgozbiór Ujazdowskiego i kolekcjonerstwo zabytków przeszłości.TOMASZ UJAZDOWSKI 1796–1836 — A TEACHER, JOURNALIST, PUBLISHER, “ANTIQUARIAN”, LOVER OF BOOKS AND ANTIQUITIES, POLITICAL ACTIVISTTomasz Ujazdowski was born in 1796 in Vilnius. In 1812 he graduated from a school in Węgrów. The need to become financially independent prompted him to join the Piarist Order in Opole Lubelskie, where he took his perpetual vows. After completing his studies in Opole and Warsaw in 1817, he began to work as a teacher in Piarist-run schools. In 1819 he began his efforts to have his vows annulled. Despite the consent of his order’s authorities, we was not released. He started a family. His longest stint as a teacher was in the regional school in Kielce 1822–1826, from where he was transferred to the regional school in Kalisz. In the summer of 1827 he was dismissed and excluded from the teaching profession. In 1828–1830 we worked in the Public Library at the University of Warsaw. During the November Uprising he was active in the Patriotic Society. In 1826 he began to publish short articles in the Warsaw press about Polish monuments he encountered during his travels. He continued writing about them in Pamiętnik Sandomierski, a quarterly he published 1829–1830. He also included there old literary works as well as documents and articles concerning the regions of Podlasie, Sandomierz, Kraków and Kalisz. During the uprising he published a satirical magazine, Tandeciarz, where he fi ercely denounced traitors and those reluctant to fight against the partitioner. He used contemporary and old works, particularly those from the last years of the Polish-Lithuanian Commonwealth. After the uprising he moved to Kraków, where he was most likely involved in illegal patriotic activities. In 1836 he was deported to Trieste, where he died.
7
Morales Cama, Grover Paúl, and Joan Manuel Morales Cama. "El magistrado Manuel Lorenzo de Vidaurre y el nacimiento de la República." Revista del Archivo General de la Nación 31, no. 1 (2016): 123–89. http://dx.doi.org/10.37840/ragn.v31i1.31.
Full textAbstract:
Durante las últimas décadas del siglo XVIII y la primera mitad del XIX el territorio peruano, como el resto de Hispanoamérica, fue escenario de una serie de eventos que lentamente produjeron importantes cambios sociales y engendraron y definieron un nuevo orden político: el del sistema de gobierno republicano. La fundación del Real Convictorio de San Carlos, la difusión de las ideas liberales de la Ilustración, la proclamación de la Constitución de Cádiz de 1812, la rebelión de los hermanos Angulo y Mateo Pumacahua en el Cuzco en 1814, la declaración de la independencia en 1821, el triunfo patriota en Ayacucho en 1824, la creación de Bolivia en 1825, y el experimento de la Confederación Perú-Boliviana (1836-1839), fueron algunos de los acontecimientos más relevantes. Manuel Lorenzo de Vidaurre (1773-1841), uno de los principales representantes de la élite intelectual peruana, cumplió un rol decisivo a lo largo de todo ese proceso: se graduó de abogado, planteó reformas radicales, optó por el separatismo y participó activamente en la organización del nuevo Estado.
8
Grotsch, Klaus. "Some remarks on the origin of ‘assimilation’ and ‘dissimilation’ in linguistic terminology." Historiographia Linguistica 16, no. 1-2 (1989): 49–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/hl.16.1-2.04gro.
Full textAbstract:
Summary The paper attempts to reconstruct when and by whom the terms ‘assimilation’ and ‘dissimilation’ were used for the first time in an expressly linguistic context, and thus became part of the scientific nomenclature. In the case of ‘dissimilation’, it may be said that it received wide currency through A. F. Pott’s use of the term in volume II of his Etymologische Forschungen in 1836. However, Pott used ‘dissimilation’ as early as 1832 and it appears that he was the introducer of the term into linguistics. The history of the term ‘assimilation’ goes further back than has thus far been assumed. Franz Bopp made use of it in 1824, and Jacob Grimm used it earlier in the second edition of volume I of his Deutsche Grammatik (1822) and even two years earlier in a letter to Karl Lachmann. It would appear, however, that the original source of ‘assimilation’ was Rasmus Rask’s Vejledning til det Islandske eller gamle Nordiske Sprog (1811), in which the term is frequently used. Grimm reviewed the book in 1812. Yet there is no indication in Rask’s writings that he considered himself the coiner or first user of ‘assimilation’ in linguistics.
9
Гапонов, Сергей Петрович, Руссом Теклай Теуэльде, and Ольга Григорьевна Солодовникова. "Fauna of louse-flies (Diptera, Hippoboscidae) of the south-east of the Central Black soil region of Russia." Herald of Tver State University. Series: Biology and Ecology, no. 3(59) (October 19, 2020): 27–40. http://dx.doi.org/10.26456/vtbio157.
Full textAbstract:
В результате проведенных в 1990-2019 годах исследований выявлено 13 видов мух-кровососок. Из них 9 видов паразитируют на птицах: Crataerina hirundinis (L., 1758), Crataerina pallidа (Olivier, 1812), Ornithomya avicularia (L., 1758), Ornithomya fringillina Curtis, 1836, Ornithomya chloropus Bergroth, 1901, Ornithoica turdi (Olivier, 1811), Ornithophila metallica (Schiner, 1864), Pseudolynchia canariensis (Mcq., 1840), Icosta ardeae (Mcq., 1935) (подсемейство Ornithomyinae) и 4 вида - Hippobosca equina L., 1758, Hippobosca longipennis F., 1805 (подсемейство Hippoboscinae), Lipoptena cervi (L., 1758) и Melophagus ovinus (L., 1758) (подсемейство Lipopteninae) - на млекопитающих. Десять видов - C. hirundinis, C. pallidа, O. avicularia, O. fringillina, O. chloropus, P. canariensis, H. equina, H. longipennis, L. cervi и M. ovinus - осуществляют жизненный цикл на территории Воронежской области. Остальные виды, по-видимому, привносятся птицами с весенними перелетами и отмечаются ежегодно в апреле-мае на птицах; пупарии их обнаружены не были. Преобладающими видами кровососок птиц в регионе являются O. avicularia (42,29%), O. fringillina (29,57%) и C. hirundinis (12,56%). Среди кровососок, паразитирующих на млекопитающих, массовым видом является L. cervi. M. ovinus, C. hirundinis и C. pallidа - моноксенные виды, I. ardeae, P. canariensis, L. cervi, H. equina и H. longipennis - олигоксенные, остальные - поликсенные. Имаго наиболее широко распространенных видов - O. avicularia, O. fringillina, C. pallida, и C. hirundinis - имеют пик активности в мае-июле, приходящийся на прилет птиц, насиживание и выкармливание птенцов. Однако C. hirundinis при позднем отлете хозяев отмечается и в августе-сентябре. Массовый вид - L. cervi - обычен в сентябре-октябре During research in 1999-2020, 13 species of the louse-flies were identified in the south-east of the Central Black Soil Region of Russia. The flies were collected on 22 bird species and 7 mammal species. Nine species of loose flies - Crataerina hirundinis (L., 1758), Crataerina pallidа (Olivier, 1812), Ornithomya avicularia (L., 1758), Ornithomya fringillina Curtis, 1836, Ornithomya chloropus Bergroth, 1901, Ornithoica turdi (Olivier, 1811), Ornithophila metallica (Schiner, 1864), Pseudolynchia canariensis (Mcq., 1840), Icosta ardeae (Mcq., 1835) (подсемейство Ornithomyinae) - are parasites of birds while 4 species - Hippobosca equina L., 1758, Hippobosca longipennis F., 1805 (подсемейство Hippoboscinae), Lipoptena cervi (L., 1758) и Melophagus ovinus (L., 1758) (подсемейство Lipopteninae) - feed on blood of mammals. P. canariensis was found in the region for the first time. Ten species of Hippoboscidae - C. hirundinis, C. pallida, O. avicularia, O. fringillina, O. chloropus, P. canariensis, H. equina, H. longipennis, L. cervi, and M. ovinus - reproduce and carry out their life cycles in Voronezh Region. The rest species - Icosta ardeae, Ornithoica turdi, and Ornithophila metallica, are introduced into the region by migratory birds. The predominant species were O. avicularia (42,29%), O. fringillina (29,57%), C. hirundinis (12,56%). Among parasites of mammals, L. cervi is a mass and wide spread species in the region. M. ovinus, Crataerina hirundinis, and Crataerina pallidа - monoxenous, P. canariensis, Icosta ardeae, L. cervi, H. equina, and H. longipennis - olygoxenous, while the rest of the species were polyxenous parasites of birds. All louse-flies species were found on birds and their nestlings in April-May, however C. hirundinis was also common on the second nestlings in August-September. Mass species, L. cervi, is usual in September-October.
10
Flores, Carol A. Hrvol. "Engaging the Mind's Eye: The Use of Inscriptions in the Architecture of Owen Jones and A. W. N. Pugin." Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 60, no. 2 (2001): 158–79. http://dx.doi.org/10.2307/991702.
Full textAbstract:
In attempting to create an appropriate architecture for an industrialized world, nineteenth-century architects argued the merits of particular materials and styles and debated principles of ornamentation and polychromatics. Although opposed in many aspects of theory and built form, their works share one aspect: a new interest in the use of inscriptions as emblematic ornamentation. The article proposes Owen Jones's publication of the Plans, Sections, Elevations and Details of the Alhambra (1836-1845) as one source for this attention to inscriptions and investigates the significance of the use of text within the decorative schemes produced by the British architects Owen Jones (1809-1874) and A. W. N. Pugin (1812-1852). The article advances the position that although Jones and Pugin had different motives for using inscriptions, both display a comprehension of Islamic ornamentation as understood and explained by Jones. New information on the relationship between Jones and Pugin is introduced and their mutual agreement and involvement in many concerns important to nineteenth-century architecture and the decorative arts are stressed. In addition, the essay explores the topic of architectural inscriptions theoretically and from a sociocultural perspective, emphasizing the importance of epigraphs within studies of the built environment, ornamentation, and visual culture, as a rich resource for understanding the mentality of a particular period and as a significant expression of the intentions informing aesthetic schemes developed by individual patrons and designers such as Jones and Pugin. Inscriptions are classified and defined in the article as informative, aesthetic, or emblematic, and the ideas and terms introduced in the essay are compared with the findings and theoretical concepts proposed in the work of the noted Islamicist Oleg Grabar.
Dissertations / Theses on the topic "1812-1836"
1
Paradis, Matthieu. "La présence militaire britannique et les réseaux d'affaires dans le Haut-Richelieu (1812-1836)." Thèse, 2007. http://hdl.handle.net/1866/17930.
Full textBooks on the topic "1812-1836"
1
Macleay, Frances Leonora. Fanny to William: The letters of Frances Leonora Macleay 1812-1836. Historic Houses Trust of NSW, Macleay Museum, University of Sydney, 1993.
2
Alward, Cleo M. Higgins. Thomas "Old Tom" Higgins, 1790-1836, Illinois Mounted Ranger, War of 1812: Research of Higgins and related families. C.M.H. Alward, 1997.
3
Mr. and Mrs. Madison's war: America's first couple and the second war of independence. Bloomsbury Press, 2012.
4
The presidency of James Madison. University press of Kansas, 1990.
5
Hacks, sycophants, adventurers, and heroes: Madison's commanders in the War of 1812. Taylor Trade Pub., 2012.
6
Howell, H. Grady. Defenders of the old southwest: A muster listing of all known Mississippi territorial volunteers (1784-1811), soldiers in the War of 1812, Creek "Red Stick" War (1813-1814), the Alamo (1836) and Mexican War (1846-1848). H. Grady Howell, Jr., 2012.
7
The Dickens industry: Critical perspectives 1836-2005. Camden House, 2008.
8
Kelley, Brent P. James Madison: Father of the Constitution. Edited by Schlesinger Arthur Meier 1917-. Chelsea House Publishers, 2001.
9
1951-, Mattern David B., ed. The papers of James Madison. University of Virginia Press, 2010.
10
James, Madison. The papers of James Madison: Presidential series. University Press of Virginia, 1992.
Book chapters on the topic "1812-1836"
1
Kiefner, J. F., and E. B. Clark. "Historical Overview." In History of Line Pipe Manufacturing in North America. ASME, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1115/1.812334_ch1.
Full textAbstract:
Prior to 1812 pipe and tubing for various uses was hand-made from wrought-iron plate by heating, bending, lapping and hammering the edges together. In 1812 an Englishman named Osborne invented machines to do much the same thing in a process known as “hammer lap-welding”. Later, in 1824 and 1825 came the process known as butt welding or furnace butt welding. Still later followed the development of continuous lap welding in the 1840's. The first extruded wrought-iron seamless tubing appeared in the 1836 with improvements arising in 1840 and 1845. It remained a costly process, however, and seamless tubing was little-used until the invention of rotary piercing in 1886. The invention of the Bessemer process for making steel in 1856 made possible the first butt-welded and lap-welded steel pipe in 1887. By 1900 most pipe was made from steel by either butt welding (1/8 to 4-inch diameter) or lap welding (2 to 12-inch diameter).
2
Hartley, Jenny. "2. Public and private." In Charles Dickens: A Very Short Introduction. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/actrade/9780198714996.003.0002.
Full textAbstract:
Charles Dickens was born in Portsmouth in February 1812. ‘Public and private’ describes his early childhood, his first jobs, and his move into writing. His father’s imprisonment for debt when he was just 12 led to the most painful episode of his life. His first sketch appeared in December 1833 and he went on to write many more under the nickname of Boz. He married Catherine Hogarth in 1836 and before he was 30 was one of the most famous men in Britain. By the late 1840s, he felt financially secure and could devote time to social reform issues. His later work and the failure of his marriage are also described.
3
Diaz-Andreu, Margarita. "The Archaeology of the French Revolution." In A World History of Nineteenth-Century Archaeology. Oxford University Press, 2007. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780199217175.003.0009.
Full textAbstract:
The nineteenth century saw the emergence of both nationalism and archaeology as a professional discipline. The aim of this chapter is to show how this apparent coincidence was not accidental. This discussion will take us into uncharted territory. Despite the growing literature on archaeology and nationalism (Atkinson et al. 1996; Díaz-Andreu & Champion 1996a; Kohl & Fawcett 1995; Meskell 1998), the relationship between the two during the late eighteenth and early nineteenth centuries has yet to be explored. The analysis of how the past was appropriated during this era of the revolutions, which marked the dawn of nationalism, is not helped by the specialized literature available on nationalism, as little attention has been paid to these early years. Most authors dealing with nationalism focus their research on the mid to late nineteenth and twentieth centuries, when the ideas that emerged during the era of the revolutions bore fruit and the balance between civic and ethnic nationalism (i.e. between a nationalism based on individual rights and the sovereignty of the people within the nation and another built on the common history and culture of the members of the nation) definitively shifted towards the latter. The reluctance to scrutinize the first years of nationalism by experts in the field may be a result of unease in dealing with a phenomenon which some simply label as patriotism. The term nationalism was not often used at the time. The political scientist Tom Nairn (1975: 6) traced it back to the late 1790s in France (it was employed by Abbé Baruel in 1798). However, its use seems to have been far from common, to the extent that other scholars believed it appeared in 1812. In other European countries, such as England, ‘nationalism’ was first employed in 1836 (Huizinga 1972: 14). Despite this disregard for the term itself until several decades later, specialists in the Weld of nationalism consider the most common date of origin as the end of the eighteenth century with the French Revolution as the key event in its definition.
4
Easley, Alexis. "Constructing the Mass-Market Woman Reader and Writer: Eliza Cook and the Weekly Dispatch, 1836–1850." In Women, Periodicals and Print Culture in Britain, 1830s-1900s. Edinburgh University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/edinburgh/9781474433907.003.0026.
Full textAbstract:
In this essay, Alexis Easley points to the significance of the marginal space of the ‘facts and scraps’ column for women writers and readers alike. As a precursor to the women’s columns and the dedicated women’s press that proliferated in the final decades of the century, the ‘facts and scraps’ columns of cheap Sunday newspapers are here shown to have ‘provided opportunities for women to publish poetry aimed at a mass-market reading audience’ (p.413). The exposure provided in this context, as well as through the practice of poems being reprinted in other newspapers, was a double-edged sword for women writers in professional terms: on the one hand, this practice ‘did not make writing newspaper poetry a lucrative enterprise’ while on the other, it ‘provided a means for women poets to establish recognisable public identities in the popular press–a visibility that sometimes led to book publication’ (p.414). The example of Eliza Cook (1812–89), a contributor to the ‘facts and scraps’ column of the Weekly Dispatch (1795–1961), shows ‘how women writers could capitalise upon opportunities that arose with the formation of new publishing media in order to establish themselves in a male-dominated literary marketplace’ (p.414).