Journal articles on the topic '1837-1929'

The Agabus adpressus-group is defined and Agabus udege sp. n. is described from the Sikhote-Alin mountain range in easternmost Russia. It is the sisterspecies of A. adpressus Aube, 1837. Some East Palearctic specimens previously assigned to Agabus discolor (Harris, 1828), A. clypealis (Thomson, 1867), and A. levanderi Hellen, 1929, in the literature are described as Agabus angusi sp. n. The new species is known from the Lake Baikal region and eastwards to NE Mongolia and northernmost China.

In Britain's development as the first industrial nation, the crucial importance of surveyors, mining engineers and geologists in prospecting and exploiting minerals and raw materials seems self-evident. Yet historians of geology have yet to take proper account of this aspect of geological science. Why is this ? One reason may simply be that the historiography of the subject itself is only relatively recent and many areas, besides industrial geology, await coverage. Or perhaps the nature of the source material is to blame. While scientific geologists filled museums with their fossils and notebooks, engaged in well-publicized controversies of the day, and wrote numerous books and articles, industrial geologists often left relatively few papers and sometimes never published their results. On the other hand, it has been suggested that the neglect of economic geology may be due to a rapidly developing bias in the subject itself. A recent study has highlighted the fact that the history of British geology, as seen through the eyes of historians at least, appears to comprise two different but closely interconnected strands. The first relates to natural history and looks toward the scientific or ‘pure’ front; the second connects with mining and the search for raw materials and is slanted towards the industrial or ‘applied’ horizon. In the same way that the scientific branch of geology brought fame and fortune in Victorian times, so the protagonists of ‘pure’ geology have so far been the chief interest of historians – so much so that the literature so far lacks detailed case studies of the careers and work of applied geologists.

S. (D.) smyrneensis Gory, 1841 is resurrected from synonymy with S. (D.) rauca (Fabricius, 1787). New synonymy is established for the following taxa: S. (D.) smyrneensis Gory, 1841 (= inconspicua Jakovlev, 1893, congrua Jakovlev, 1900, anxia Jakovlev, 1900, captiosa Jakovlev, 1902, delicata Kerremans, 1909, subsulcata Kerremans, 1909, migriensis Obenberger, 1916, nephele Obenberger, 1929, cassia Obenberger, 1929, maronita Obenberger, 1929, salomonis Obenberger, 1952, pseudorauca Obenberger, 1952, agilis Obenberger, 1952, synn. n.), S. (D.) rauca (Fabricius, 1787) (= heliobia Obenberger, 1929, syn. n.), S. (D.) gemmata gemmata (Olivier, 1790) (= raucoides Obenberger, 1920, syn. n.), S. (D.) signata Jakovlev, 1887 (= obsoleta Jakovlev, 1891, satelles Jakovlev, 1898, addenda Jakovlev, 1900, jejuna Jakovlev, 1900, detrita Jakovlev, 1902, destituta Obenberger, 1929, julia Obenberger, 1929, araxicola Obenberger, 1929, buresi Obenberger, 1933, hierosolymitana Obenberger, 1946, jureceki Obenberger, 1946, arsinoe Obenberger, 1952, gyaurdagensis Obenberger, 1955, synn. n.), S. (D.) aeneomicans Kraatz, 1882 (= unidentata Jakovlev, 1891, veselyi Obenberger, 1915, aladaghensis Obenberger, 1920, aeneofulgens Obenberger, 1929, persica Obenberger, 1929, ushinskii Obenberger, 1929, ahriman Obenberger, 1929, amasiae Obenberger, 1929, baicalensis Obenberger, 1929, fabichi Obenberger, 1952, fleischeri Obenberger, 1952, moganensis Obenberger, 1955, hoberlandti Obenberger, 1955, synn. n.), S. (D.) misella Jakovlev, 1900 (= liliputana Obenberger, 1929, callimicra Obenberger, 1929, synn. n.), S. (D.) incerta Jakovlev, 1887 (= dolens Jakovlev, 1893, confusa Kerremans, 1913, joukli Obenberger, 1929, synn. n.), S. (D.) koenigi Jakovlev, 1891 (= integripennis Obenberger, 1929, alma Obenberger, 1952, synn. n.), S. (D.) sulciventris Jakovlev, 1886 (= kraatzi Jakovlev, 1887, alaiensis Jakovlev, 1893, dives Jakovlev, 1902, aucta Jakovlev, 1902, jaxartis Obenberger, 1929, kuliabensis Obenberger, 1952, synn. n.), S. (D.) bucharica Jakovlev, 1900 (= bactriana Jakovlev, 1902, syn. n.), S. (D.) hamata Jakovlev, 1899 (= zarawshanensis Obenberger, 1929, syn. n.), S. (D.) sculpticollis Heyden, 1886 (= alutaceiceps Obenberger, 1929, morgani Obenberger, 1929, synn. n.), S. (D.) simplex Jakovlev, 1893 (= fraterna Jakovlev, 1900, allecta Jakovlev, 1900, samotica Obenberger, 1929, ankarana Obenberger, 1952, synn. n.), S. (D.) micans Jakovlev, 1886 (= binominata Kerremans, 1913, irritatrix Obenberger, 1929, shah Obenberger, 1929, pseudomicans Obenberger, 1929, escalerae Obenberger, 1929, synn. n.), S. (D.) parysatis Obenberger, 1929 (= isfahanensis Obenberger, 1952, proserpina Obenberger, 1952, synn. n.), S. (D.) manifesta Jakovlev, 1900 (= megarauca Obenberger,1952, syn. n.), S. (D.) curta Jakovlev, 1885 (= caspica Jakovlev, 1904, plavilscikovi Obenberger, 1952, synn. n.), S. (D.) antilibanensis Obenberger, 1952 (= nikitaliae Obenberger, 1952, syn. n.), S. (s. str.) arcana Jakovlev, 1908 (= assuricola Obenberger, 1920, baghdadensis Obenberger, 1929, stella Obenberger, 1952, teheranica Obenberger, 1952, assuricola heliochaera Obenberger, 1929, synn. n.), S. (s. str.) antiqua (Illiger, 1803) (= serena Jakovlev, 1900, earo Obenberger, 1929, synn. n.), S. (s. str.) hypocrita Mannerheim, 1837 (= glabricollis Obenberger, 1929, levantina Obenberger, 1929, synn. n.), S. (s. str.) varia Jakovlev, 1887 (= samarkanda Obenberger, 1929, syn. n.), S. (s. str.) demissa Marseul, 1865 (= breiti Obenberger, 1920, syn. n.), S. (s. str.) pilipes Jakovlev, 1886 (= anchorifera Obenberger, 1952, syn. n.). S. donata Obenberger, 1929 and S. subtricostata Kraatz, 1882 are transferred from subgen. Deudora to Sphenoptera s. str. and S. confusa Kerremans, 1913, from subgen. Sphenoptera s. str. to Deudora. Lectotypes are designated for 112 nominal species and subspecies and 5 infrasubspecific taxa. Neotype is designated for S. armena (Steven, 1829).

As part of the studies on Amaranthaceae Juss. (e.g. Iamonico 2014, 2015, Sánchez Del Pino & Iamonico 2016), and the preparation of the new Checklist of the Italian vascular alien Flora (Galasso et al. 2016), I present here a note on an Amaranthus hybrid which was reported for Italy by Cacciato (1966) as “Amaranthus ×galii Sennen & Gonzalo” (Sennen 1929: 34). This name was proposed by Sennen & Gonzalo (l.c.) without a diagnosis, and it is a nomen nudum and invalid under Art. 38.1 of the ICN (McNeill et al. 2012). Furthermore, Sennen & Gonzalo in Sennen (1929: 34) cited Amaranthus patulus Bertoloni (1837: 19) and A. retroflexus Linnaeus (1753: 991) as parental taxa of the new hybrid. According to the current knowledge (see Iamonico 2016), A. patulus is a heterotypic synonym of A. hybridus Linnaeus (1753: 990). Consequently, the hybrid concept of Sennen & Gonzalo refers to A. ×ozanonii (Thellung 1914: 263) Schuster & Goldschmidt in Ascherson & Graebner 1920: 20) (= A. hybridus × A. retroflexus).

Leporinus obtusidens Valenciennes, 1837 and L. elongatus Valenciennes, 1850 are redescribed based on the type specimens, including those of their junior synonyms, and recently collected specimens. Leporinus obtusidens is considered to be widespread, occuring in the river drainages of La Plata, São Francisco, and Parnaíba. Leporinus aguapeiensis Campos, 1945, described from the upper Rio Paraná, and L. silvestrii Boulenger, 1902, described from the Rio Paraguay, are considered junior synonyms of L. obtusidens. Leporinus elongatus is endemic to the Rio Jequitinhonha and Rio Pardo, two eastern Brazilian river basins, and the locality cited for the lectotype, Rio São Fransico, likely to be erroneous. Leporinus crassilabris Borodin, 1929, and L. crassilabris breviceps Borodin, 1929, both described from the Rio Jequitinhonha, are considered junior synynoms of L. elongatus. A new species of Leporinus, endemic to the upper Rio Paraná, very similar and sometimes mistaken with L. obtusidens, is formally described. In addition, comments on Leporinus pachyurus Valenciennes, 1850 and on L. bimaculatus Castelnau, 1855 are provided, and a lectotype for L. bimaculatus is selected.

In this study, the blister beetles belonging to the Hycleus sexmaculatus species group are revised. Morphological characters are described and figured for each species and keys to both male and female are provided. Hycleus hayki new species from Southwest Iran is described and the following new synonymies are proposed: Mylabris triangulifera ab. reitterioides Mader 1929 = Hycleus bipunctatus (Olivier, 1811) new synonymy; Mylabris triangulifera ab. bushirensis Mader 1929 = Hycleus bipunctatus (Olivier, 1811) new synonymy; Mylabris javeti Marseul, 1870 = Hycleus colligatus (Redtenbacher, 1850) new synonymy; Mylabris javeti umbilicatus Kaszab, 1958 = Hycleus colligatus (Redtenbacher, 1850) new synonymy; Hycleus amrishi Makhan, 2012 = Hycleus cingulatus (Faldermann, 1837) new synonymy. Additional remarks which rectify previous errors in the identification of the species are provided. The taxonomic positions of Zonabris soumacovi Pic, 1930 and Zonabris sialanus Pic, 1929 are also discussed. Phylogenetic relationships of the species, based on a subset of available species inferred from molecular data are proposed, and some morphologically defined subgroups of species are distinguished with the molecular support. The geographic and ecological distributions of all the species are defined, and a detailed list of localities is provided. The ecological information including phenology, elevation and host plants of the species are summarized in a table. Based on literature records, collections and recently collected data, the distribution of the sexmaculatus species and their biogeographic characteristics are discussed.

Analisa os estudos dietéticos realizados no Brasil entre meados do século XIX e início do século XXI. O método compreendeu a realização de revisão bibliográfica, procurando identificar e analisar, ao longo de seis cortes transversais intencionalmente estabelecidos (1837-1899; 1900-1929; 1930- 1939; 1940-1969; 1970-1989 e 1990-2005), as distintas modalidades e os principais resultados dos inquéritos sobre consumo alimentar realizados no país. Distintos procedimentos metodológicos de avaliação dietética de indivíduos e populações foram identificados: história alimentar; inquérito recordatório de 24 horas; registro ou diário alimentar; pesos e medidas de alimentos; questionário de freqüência de consumo alimentar e pesquisa de orçamento alimentar. Conclui-se que, ao tempo em que se aperfeiçoaram os métodos e instrumentos de avaliação do consumo alimentar, verificaramse profundas e substanciais alterações no padrão de consumo e nos hábitos alimentares da população brasileira.

The spider genusPterotrichaKulczyński, 1903 (Gnaphosidae) is surveyed in Iran. To date, three species of this genus were known in the country:P.loeffleri(Roewer, 1955),P.lentiginosa(C. L. Koch, 1837) andP.pseudoparasyriacaNuruyeva & Huseynov, 2016. Here two new species are described,P.kovblyukiZamani & Marusik,sp. n.(♂, western Iran) andP.montanaZamani & Marusik,sp. n.(♀, central and southwestern Iran), and P.cf.dalmasi Fage, 1929 (from Algeria to Jordan) is reported in Iran for the first time.PterotrichatikaderiGajbe, 1983syn. n.(India) andP.loeffleri(Roewer, 1955),syn. n.are synonymized withP.strandiSpassky, 1936 (hitherto known from Turkmenistan only). The record ofP.lentiginosafrom Iran is apparently based on misidentification. A distribution map of the genus in Iran with new provincial records is provided. In addition,IranotrichaZamani & Marusik,gen. n., a new genus closely related toPterotricha, is described from southeastern Iran with the type speciesI.lutensisZamani & Marusik,sp. n.

AbstractComposition, systematics, distribution and bionomics of the poorly known primarily Oriental genus Anchocerus Fauvel, 1905 is reviewed, with an annotated list and identification key provided for all 13 named species of the genus. The poorly known species from Papua New Guinea, A. punctus Last, 1980, A. similis Last, 1980 and A. wilhelmensis Last, 1980 are redescribed. Three new species, A. aparamerus sp.n. from Borneo, A. grandis sp.n. and A. thailandicus sp.n., both from Thailand are described. One species is transferred to Anchocerus from the genus Acylophorus Nordmann, 1837: Anchocerus tenuipes (Lea, 1929) comb. n., and also redescribed. Two species of Anchocerus are moved to Acylophorus: Acylophorus novaguinensis (Last, 1975) comb. n. and Acylophorus okasaensis (Last, 1975) comb. n. Morphological characters distinguishing the genera Anchocerus and Acylophorus are summarized. Type material was examined for all insufficiently known species.

The orb-weaving spider subfamily Arkyinae L. Koch, 1872 is exclusively found in the Australasian region and its taxonomy and the systematic relationships within and between genera of this subfamily are poorly understood. We here revise the arkyine genus Demadiana Strand, 1929 to include six Australian species, four of which are described as new: Demadiana simplex (Karsch, 1878) (type species), D. carrai, sp. nov., D. cerula (Simon, 1908), comb. nov., D. complicata, sp. nov., D. diabolus, sp. nov., and D. milledgei, sp. nov. A phylogenetic analysis based on an updated araneid morphological data matrix including 57 genera of orb-weaving spiders identified Demadiana as a member of the araneid subfamily Arkyinae. A separate phylogenetic analysis for the genus at the species level showed little resolution within Demadiana, but did identify a monophyletic Demadiana supported by three putative synapomorphies: small unique setal pits with spherical sockets covering the carapace, sternum and the bases of the paturon (chelicerae), an extreme elongation of the trumpet-like aggregate spigots of the posterior lateral spinnerets and a distinct curvature of the embolus. We detail several new generic and species synonymies within Arkyinae. Aerea Urquhart, 1891 (type species Aerea alticephala Urquhart, 1891) and Neoarchemorus Mascord, 1968 (type species N. speechleyi Mascord, 1968) are regarded as junior synonyms of Arkys Walckenaer, 1837 (type species A. lancearius Walckenaer, 1837), resulting in Arkys speechleyi (Mascord, 1968), comb. nov. Aerea magnifica Urquhart, 1893 and Archemorus simsoni Simon, 1893 are regarded as junior synonyms of Aerea alticephala Urquhart, 1891, and Arkys nitidiceps Simon, 1908 is proposed as a junior synonym of Arkys walckenaeri Simon, 1879.

Based on field work mostly done in the late 20th century, a survey is given on the diversity and distribution of spring- and stream-dwelling water mites of the family Hygrobatidae in Italy. Five species, all representatives of the subgenus Atractides Koch, 1837 s. str., are described as new to science: Atractides asinus sp. nov., A. castor sp. nov., A. cydonius sp. nov., A. dinisi sp. nov., and A. pollux sp. nov.. A further 13 species are recorded for the first time from Italy: Atractides anellatus Lundblad, 1956, A. asticae Petrova, 1968, A. denticulatus Walter, 1947, A. fissus (Walter, 1927), A. fluviatilis (Szalay, 1929), A. glandulosus (Walter, 1918), A. graecus K. Viets, 1950, A. lunipes Lundblad, 1956, A. remotus Szalay, 1953, A. subterraneus (K. Viets, 1932), Hygrobates arenarius Smit & Pešić, 2017, H. setosus Besseling, 1942, and H. cf. turcicus Pešić, Esen & Dabert, 2017. In summary, a total number of 66 hygrobatid species is now known from the area treated. Previous records of Atractides allgaier Gerecke, 2003 from Corsica and Sardinia, and of A. lunipes Lundblad, 1956 from Corsica, refer to A. castor sp. nov., resp. A. corsicus E. Angelier, 1954. Redescriptions are given for seven remarkable and/or incompletely documented species: Atractides asticae, A. fluviatilis, A. graecus, A. inflatipalpis K. Viets, 1950, A. lunipes, A. protendens K.O. Viets, 1955, and A. remotus. Problems concerning diagnostic features are discussed for several species. Atractides fluviatilis, A. valencianus K. Viets, 1930 and A. inflatipalpis, along with two species not recorded from Italy, namely A. algeriensis (Lundblad, 1942) and A. stancovici Pešić & Gerecke, 2010, are summed up in a “fluviatilis species group”. Within this clade, several species tend to grade into each other morphologically, and females cannot be classified with certainty.

The following taxonomic or nomenclatural changes are proposed: Agrilus acastus Kerremans, 1913 (= ohbayashii Tôyama, 1987 syn. nov.); A. adonis Deyrolle, 1864 (= falsulus Obenberger, 1924 syn. nov.); A. albopunctatus Deyrolle, 1864 (= nepos Kerremans, 1900 syn. nov.); A. angustulus (Illiger, 1803) (= laeticeps Semenov, 1890 syn. nov.); A. basilewskyanus Descarpentries & Villiers, 1963 correct original spelling; A. birmanicus Kerremans, 1892 (= legitimus Obenberger, 1936 syn. nov.); A. cairnensis Obenberger, 1959 correct original spelling (= cairnsensis Curletti, 2001 unjustified emendation syn. nov.); A. chekiangensis Gebhardt, 1929 (= semivittatus Tôyama, 1985 syn. nov.); A. confutus Obenberger, 1936 (= conjectus Obenberger, 1936 syn. nov.); A. convergens Fisher, 1930 (= japanensis Obenberger, 1935 syn. nov.); A. croaticus Abeille de Perrin, 1897 (= serbicus Obenberger, 1927 syn. nov.); A. cyanipennis Gory & Laporte, 1837 (= ornativentris Saunders, 1866 syn. nov.; = agilis Kerremans, 1894 syn. nov.; = amabilicolor Obenberger, 1936b syn. nov.); A. decoloratus decoloratus Kerremans, 1892 (= afghanistanicus Alexeev in Alexeev, Volkovitsh & Kabakov, 1992 syn. nov.); A. dignus Kerremans, 1912 (= csikii Gebhardt, 1925 syn. nov.; = kayan Fisher, 1930 syn. nov.); A. discicollis Deyrolle, 1864 (= punctiventris Kerremans, 1900 syn. nov.); A. ecarinatus Marseul, 1866 (= gracilicornis Ganglbauer, 1890 syn. nov.); A. erythrostictus Bourgoin, 1922 (= barmensis Obenberger, 1936 syn. nov.); A. fleischeri Obenberger, 1925 (= kurosawai Obenberger, 1940 syn. nov.; = tscherepanovi Stepanov, 1954 syn. nov.); A. lineariformis new replacement name (= lineatus Kerremans, 1899 syn. nov.); A. maculiventris Deyrolle, 1864 (= opulentus Kerremans, 1900b syn. nov., = woodlarkianus Kerremans, 1900c syn. nov., = viridissimus Cobos, 1964 syn. nov.); A. marginicollis Saunders, 1873 (= beppuensis Obenberger, 1936 syn. nov.); A. moerens Saunders, 1873 (= araxicola Abeille de Perrin, 1897 syn. nov.); A. monogrammus Thomson, 1879 (= kabakovi Alexeev in Alexeev,Volkovitsh & Kabakov, 1992 syn. nov.); A. ocularis Deyrolle, 1864 (= bidentellus Obenberger, 1924 syn. nov.); A. paganettii Obenberger, 1913 (= pisanus Curletti, 1980 syn. nov.); A. perniciosus Deyrolle, 1864 (= perniciosus Obenberger unavailable name, = subperniciosus Obenberger, 1936 unavailable name); A. perviridis Kerremans, 1894 (= singaporensis Obenberger, 1924 syn. nov.); A. quadrisignatus Marseul, 1866 (= mongoliae Obenberger, 1922; = lama Obenberger, 1935 syn. nov.); A. sospes Lewis, 1893 (= kinoshitae Obenberger, 1936 syn. nov.; = quadristictulus Oben-

Various issues in taxonomy and nomenclature of Diptera Chironomidae are discussed, in order to formalize and explain scientific names used in the Fauna Europaea database publications. General and specific remarks point out and exemplify the most common causes for erroneous data: insufficient consultation of the primary sources (literature and material), unjustified assumptions of type status, and uncritical handling of untested information. Recommendations are offered on how to avoid or solve such problems, and increase the stability and quality of the chironomid system. In addition to a number of changes affecting endings of species epithets, authorship, dates of publication, etc., the following acts and recognitions of nomenclature are proposed.Paramerina cingulata (Walker, 1856) remains valid in spite of being a junior homonym. Thienemannimyia geijskesi (Goetghebuer, 1934) by emendation replaces the incorrect original spelling "Ablasblesmyia Geijkesi". Diamesa starmachi Kownacki & Kownacka, 1970 is valid, D. starmachii is an incorrect (variant) original spelling. The new substitute name Cricotopus (Isocladius) maurii is proposed for C. (I.) polychaetus Hirvenoja, 1989, a junior secondary homonym of C. polychaetus (Kieffer, 1923). Dactylocladius longicalcar Kieffer sensu Thienemann (1926) = Eukiefferiella gracei (Edwards, 1929), a misidentification of Dactylocladius longicalcar Kieffer, 1911, is selected as the type species of Eukiefferiella Thienemann, 1926. Gymnometriocnemus and Pseudosmittia are available and valid from Edwards (1932). Limnophyes minimus (Meigen, 1818) is the valid name for Camptocladius foenisuga Potthast, 1914 syn. n. and C. hexatomus Potthast, 1914 syn. n. Metriocnemus cavicola Kieffer, 1921 is valid, M. "martinii" of Thienemann (1921) is a nomen nudum. Nanocladius dichromus (Kieffer, 1906) is the valid name for Chironomus bicolor Zetterstedt, 1838 (preoccupied by Waltl, 1837). Orthocladius (Eudactylocladius) almskari S ther, nom. nov., replaces the junior primary homonym O. (Eud.) schnelli S ther, 2004. Paralimnophyes longiseta (Thienemann, 1919) is the senior synonym of P. hydrophilus (Goetghebuer, 1921). Lindebergia Tuiskunen, 1984 has been a junior synonym of Pseudosmittia Edwards, 1932 since S ther & Ferrington (2003). Both Pseudosmittia hamata (Freeman, 1956) and P. neohamata Cranston, 1990 (= P. hamata Strenzke, 1960) comb n. are junior synonyms of P. danconai (Marcuzzi, 1947). Zalutschia tornetraeskensis (Edwards & Thienemann in Thienemann, 1941) is the correct spelling and authorship for the species originally described in Trissocladius. Chironomus (Camptochironomus) subaprilinus Kieffer, 1918 has been fixed as the type species of Camptochironomus Kieffer, 1918 by Goetghebuer (1937). Chironomus (Lobochironomus) dorsalis Meigen, 1818 is the valid name for C. longipes Staeger, 1839 syn. n., C. tricolor van der Wulp, 1874 syn. n., and C. bequaerti Goetghebuer, 1921 syn. n. The new substitute name Cladopelma goetghebueri is proposed for Chironomus lateralis Goetghebuer, 1934 (preoccupied by Walker in Curtis, 1837). Dicrotendipes septemmaculatus (Becker) is considered as the valid name for the type species of Dicrotendipes Kieffer, 1913: D. pictipennis Kieffer, 1913, a junior synonym. Dicrotendipes pulsus (Walker, 1856), not D. objectans (Walker, 1856), is the valid name for European material previously misidentified as D. modestus (Say, 1823). The type species of Glyptotendipes Kieffer, 1913 is Chironomus verrucosus Kieffer, 1911; a lectotype is designated, and the adult female diagnosed. The three subgenera in Glyptotendipes are reclassified; G. (Caulochironomus) Heyn, 1993 type species Chironomus caulicola Kieffer, 1913 is valid; G. (Heynotendipes) nom. nov. type species Chironomus signatus Kieffer, 1909 replaces G. (Trichotendipes) Heyn, 1993 (preoccupied by Trichotendipes Guha et al., 1985). Glyptotendipes imbecilis (Walker, 1856) is used as valid, in this correct original spelling. Glyptotendipes cauliginellus (Kieffer, 1913) takes precedence over G. gripekoveni (Kieffer, 1913), and becomes the valid name for Chironomus sparganii Willem, 1908 (preoccupied by C. sparganii Kieffer, 1908), G. gracilis Kieffer, 1918, G. iridis Kieffer, 1918 syn. n., G. scirporum Kieffer, 1924, and G. discolor Kieffer, 1926 syn. n. Kiefferulus Goetghebuer, 1922 is the valid name for Tendochironomus Lenz, 1937 syn. n. Polypedilum octopunctatum (Thunberg, 1784), for which a lectotype is designated, is the valid name for P. quadrimaculatum (Meigen, 1838) syn. n. The new substitute name Stempellinella edwardsi is proposed for Tanytarsus minor Edwards, 1929 (preoccupied by Kieffer, 1916). The type species of Stenochironomus Kieffer, 1919 is Chironomus pulchripennis Coquillett, 1902 by designation of Townes (1945). Stenochironomus gibbus (Fabricius, 1794), nomen protectum, is the valid name for S. parisiensis (Thunberg, 1784) syn. n., nomen oblitum. The following names require revisionary clarification, any future use should explicitly include the recent reference after which they are interpreted: Clunio adriaticus Schiner, 1856; Cluniobalearicus Bezzi, 1913; Chironomus "annularius" auctt.; Chironomus dorsalis auctt. not Meigen, 1818; Chironomus pallidivittatus auctt. not Malloch, 1915; Chironomus prasinus auctt. not Meigen, 1804; Chironomus venustus auctt. not Staeger, 1839; Chironomus viridis Macquart, 1834; Endochironomus albipennis (Meigen, 1830); Endochironomus tendens (Fabricius, 1775); Glyptotendipes foliicola Kieffer, 1918; Glyptotendipes sigillatus Kieffer, 1918; Tendipes abranchius Kieffer, 1913.

The genus Olios Walckenaer, 1837 is revised, a generic diagnosis is given and an identification key to eight species groups is provided. Olios in its revised sense includes 87 species and is distributed in Africa, southern Europe and Asia. Three species groups are revised in this first part, an identification key to species for each group is provided, five new species are described and all included species are illustrated. The Olios argelasius-group includes O. argelasius Walckenaer, 1806, O. canariensis (Lucas, 1838), O. pictus (Simon, 1885), O. fasciculatus Simon, 1880 and O. kunzi spec. nov. (male, female; Namibia, Zambia, South Africa); it is distributed in the Mediterranean region, northern Africa including Canary Islands, in the Middle East, South Sudan, East Africa, and southern Africa. The Olios coenobitus-group includes O. angolensis spec. nov. (male; Angola), O. coenobitus Fage, 1926, O. denticulus spec. nov. (male; Java), O. erraticus Fage, 1926, O. gambiensis spec. nov. (male, female; Gambia), O. milleti (Pocock, 1901b), O. mordax (O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1899) and O. pusillus Simon, 1880; it is distributed in Africa (Gambia, Angola, Tanzania, Madagascar) and Asia (India, Sri Lanka, Indonesia: Java). The Olios auricomis-group includes only O. auricomis (Simon, 1880), distributed in Africa south of 10°N. Other species groups are introduced briefly and will be revised in forthcoming revisions. The Olios correvoni-group includes currently O. claviger (Pocock, 1901a), O. correvoni Lessert, 1921, O. correvoni choupangensis Lessert, 1936, O. darlingi (Pocock, 1901a), O. faesi Lessert, 1933, O. freyi Lessert, 1929, O. kassenjicola Strand, 1916b, O. kruegeri (Simon, 1897a), O. quadrispilotus (Simon, 1880) comb. nov., O. lucieni comb. nov. nom. nov., O. sjostedti Lessert, 1921 and O. triarmatus Lessert, 1936; it is distributed in Africa (Zimbabwe, Tanzania incl. Zanzibar, Angola, Congo, Central Africa, South Africa, Botswana; O. darlingi was recorded from Zimbabwe and Botswana and not from South Africa). The Olios rossettii-group includes: O. baulnyi (Simon, 1874), O. bhattacharjeei (Saha & Raychaudhuri, 2007), O. brachycephalus Lawrence, 1938, O. floweri Lessert, 1921, O. jaldaparaensis Saha & Raychaudhuri, 2007, O. japonicus Jäger & Ono, 2000, O. kolosvaryi (Caporiacco, 1947b) comb. nov., O. longipes (Simon, 1884b), O. lutescens (Thorell, 1894), O. mahabangkawitus Barrion & Litsinger, 1995, O. obesulus (Pocock, 1901b), O. rossettii (Leardi, 1901), O. rotundiceps (Pocock, 1901b), O. sericeus (Kroneberg, 1875), O. sherwoodi Lessert, 1929, O. suavis (O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1876), O. tarandus (Simon, 1897d), O. tener (Thorell, 1891) and O. tiantongensis (Zhang & Kim, 1996); it is distributed in the Mediterranean region, in Africa (especially eastern half) and Asia (Middle East and Central Asia to Japan, Philippines and Java). The Olios nentwigi-group includes O. diao Jäger, 2012, O. digitatus Sun, Li & Zhang, 2011, O. jaenicke Jäger, 2012, O. muang Jäger, 2012, O. nanningensis (Hu & Ru, 1988), O. nentwigi spec. nov. (male, female; Indonesia: Krakatau), O. perezi Barrion & Litsinger, 1995, O. scalptor Jäger & Ono, 2001 and O. suung Jäger, 2012; it is distributed in Asia (Thailand, Laos, Vietnam, Cambodia, China, Taiwan, Indonesia, Philippines), Papua New Guinea and Mariana Islands. Olios diao is newly recorded from Cambodia and Champasak Province in Laos. The Olios stimulator-group includes O. admiratus (Pocock, 1901b), O. hampsoni (Pocock, 1901b), O. lamarcki (Latreille, 1806) and O. stimulator Simon, 1897c; it is distributed in Africa (Madagascar, Seychelles), Middle East and South Asia (United Arab Emirates, Iraq, Afghanistan, Pakistan, India, Maldives, Sri Lanka). The Olios hirtus-group includes O. bungarensis Strand, 1913b, O. debalae (Biswas & Roy, 2005), O. ferox (Thorell, 1892), O. hirtus (Karsch, 1879a), O. igraya (Barrion & Litsinger, 1995) comb. nov., O. menghaiensis (Wang & Zhang, 1990), O. nigrifrons (Simon, 1897b), O. punctipes Simon, 1884a, O. punctipes sordidatus (Thorell, 1895), O. pyrozonis (Pocock, 1901b), O. sungaya (Barrion & Litsinger, 1995) comb. nov., O. taprobanicus Strand, 1913b and O. tikaderi Kundu et al., 1999; it is distributed in South, East and Southeast Asia (Sri Lanka, India, Nepal, Bangladesh, Myanmar, China, Laos, Thailand, Cambodia, Vietnam, Malaysia, Indonesia, Philippines). Nineteen synonyms are recognised: Nisueta Simon, 1880, Nonianus Simon, 1885, both = Olios syn. nov.; O. spenceri Pocock, 1896, O. werneri (Simon, 1906a), O. albertius Strand, 1913a, O. banananus Strand, 1916a, O. aristophanei Lessert, 1936, all = O. fasciculatus; O. subpusillus Strand, 1907c = O. pusillus; O. schonlandi (Pocock, 1900b), O. rufilatus Pocock, 1900c, O. chiracanthiformis Strand, 1906, O. ituricus Strand, 1913a, O. isongonis Strand, 1915, O. flavescens Caporiacco, 1941 comb. nov., O. pacifer Lessert, 1921, all = O. auricomis; Olios sanguinifrons (Simon, 1906b) = O. rossettii Leardi, 1901; O. phipsoni (Pocock, 1899), Sparassus iranii (Pocock, 1901b), both = O. stimulator; O. fuligineus (Pocock, 1901b) = O. hampsoni. Nine species are transferred to Olios: O. gaujoni (Simon, 1897b) comb. nov., O. pictus comb. nov., O. unilateralis (Strand, 1908b) comb. nov. (all three from Nonianus), O. affinis (Strand, 1906) comb. nov., O. flavescens Caporiacco, 1941 comb. nov., O. quadrispilotus comb. nov., O. similis (Berland, 1922) comb. nov. (all four from Nisueta), O. sungaya (Barrion & Litsinger, 1995) comb. nov., O. igraya (Barrion & Litsinger, 1995) comb. nov. (both from Isopeda L. Koch 1875). Olios lucieni nom. nov. comb. nov. is proposed for Nisueta similis Berland, 1922, which becomes a secondary homonym. The male of O. quadrispilotus comb. nov. is described for the first time. Sixteen species are currently without affiliation to one of the eight species groups: O. acolastus (Thorell, 1890), O. alluaudi Simon, 1887a, O. batesi (Pocock, 1900c), O. bhavnagarensis Sethi & Tikader, 1988, O. croseiceps (Pocock, 1898b), O. durlaviae Biswas & Raychaudhuri, 2005, O. gentilis (Karsch, 1879b), O. gravelyi Sethi & Tikader, 1988, O. greeni (Pocock, 1901b), O. inaequipes (Simon 1890), O. punjabensis Dyal, 1935, O. ruwenzoricus Strand, 1913a, O. senilis Simon, 1880, O. somalicus Caporiacco, 1940, O. wroughtoni (Simon, 1897c) and O. zulu Simon, 1880. Five of these species are illustrated in order to allow identification of the opposite (male) sex and to settle their systematic placement. Thirty-seven species are considered nomina dubia, mostly because they were described from immatures, three of them are illustrated: O. abnormis (Blackwall, 1866), O. affinis (Strand, 1906) comb. nov., O. africanus (Karsch, 1878), O. amanensis Strand, 1907a, O. annandalei (Simon, 1901), O. bivittatus Roewer, 1951, O. ceylonicus (Leardi, 1902), O. conspersipes (Thorell, 1899), Palystes derasus (C.L. Koch, 1845) comb. nov., O. detritus (C.L. Koch, 1845), O. digitalis Eydoux & Souleyet, 1842, O. exterritorialis Strand, 1907b, O. flavovittatus (Caporiacco, 1935), O. fugax (O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1885), O. guineibius Strand, 1911c, O. guttipes (Simon, 1897a), O. kiranae Sethi & Tikader, 1988, O. longespinus Caporiacco, 1947b, O. maculinotatus Strand, 1909, O. morbillosus (MacLeay, 1827), O. occidentalis (Karsch, 1879b), O. ornatus (Thorell, 1877), O. pagurus Walckenaer, 1837, O. patagiatus (Simon, 1897b), O. praecinctus (L. Koch, 1865), O. provocator Walckenaer, 1837, O. quesitio Moradmand, 2013, O. quinquelineatus Taczanowski, 1872, O. sexpunctatus Caporiacco, 1947a, Heteropoda similaris (Rainbow, 1898) comb. rev., O. socotranus (Pocock, 1903), O. striatus (Blackwall, 1867), O. timidus (O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1885), Remmius variatus (Thorell, 1899) comb. nov., O. vittifemur Strand, 1916b, O. wolfi Strand, 1911a and O. zebra (Thorell, 1881). Eighty-nine species are misplaced in Olios but cannot be affiliated to any of the known genera. They belong to the subfamilies Deleninae Hogg, 1903, Sparassinae Bertkau, 1872 and Palystinae Simon, 1897a, nineteen of them are illustrated: O. acostae Schenkel, 1953, O. actaeon (Pocock, 1898c), O. artemis Hogg, 1915, O. atomarius Simon, 1880, O. attractus Petrunkevitch, 1911, O. auranticus Mello-Leitão, 1918, O. benitensis (Pocock, 1900c), O. berlandi Roewer, 1951, O. biarmatus Lessert, 1925, O. canalae Berland, 1924, O. caprinus Mello-Leitão, 1918, O. chelifer Lawrence, 1937, O. chubbi Lessert, 1923, O. clarus (Keyserling, 1880), O. coccineiventris (Simon, 1880), O. corallinus Schmidt, 1971, O. crassus Banks, 1909, O. debilipes Mello-Leitão, 1945, O. discolorichelis Caporiacco, 1947a, O. erroneus O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1890, O. extensus Berland, 1924, O. fasciiventris Simon, 1880 , O. feldmanni Strand, 1915, O. fimbriatus Chrysanthus, 1965, O. flavens Nicolet, 1849, O. fonticola (Pocock, 1902), O. formosus Banks, 1929, O. francoisi (Simon, 1898a), O. fulvithorax Berland, 1924, O. galapagoensis Banks, 1902, O. gaujoni (Simon, 1897b) comb. nov., O. giganteus Keyserling, 1884, O. hoplites Caporiacco, 1941, O. humboldtianus Berland, 1924, O. insignifer Chrysanthus, 1965, O. insulanus (Thorell, 1881), O. keyserlingi (Simon, 1880), O. lacticolor Lawrence, 1952, O. lepidus Vellard, 1924, O. longipedatus Roewer, 1951, O. machadoi Lawrence, 1952, O. macroepigynus Soares, 1944, O. maculatus Blackwall, 1862, O. marshalli (Pocock, 1898a), O. mathani (Simon, 1880), O. minensis Mello-Leitão, 1917, O. monticola Berland, 1924, O. mutabilis Mello-Leitão, 1917, O. mygalinus Doleschall, 1857, O. mygalinus cinctipes Merian, 1911, O. mygalinus nirgripalpis Merian, 1911, O. neocaledonicus Berland, 1924, O. nigristernis (Simon, 1880), O. nigriventris Taczanowski, 1872, O. oberzelleri Kritscher, 1966, O. obscurus (Keyserling, 1880), O. obtusus F.O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1900, O. orchiticus Mello-Leitão, 1930, O. oubatchensis Berland, 1924, O. paraensis (Keyserling, 1880), O. pellucidus (Keyserling, 1880), O. peruvianus Roewer, 1951, O. pictitarsis Simon, 1880, O. plumipes Mello-Leitão, 1937, O. princeps Hogg, 1914, O. pulchripes (Thorell, 1899), O. puniceus (Simon, 1880), O. roeweri Caporiacco, 1955a, O. rubripes Taczanowski, 1872, O. rubriventris (Thorell, 1881), O. rufus Keyserling, 1880, O. sanctivincenti (Simon, 1898b), O. similis (O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1890), O. simoni (O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1890), O. skwarrae Roewer, 1933, O. spinipalpis (Pocock, 1901a), O. stictopus (Pocock, 1898a), O. strandi Kolosváry, 1934, O. subadultus Mello-Leitão, 1930, O. sulphuratus (Thorell, 1899), O. sylvaticus (Blackwall, 1862), O. tamerlani Roewer, 1951, O. tigrinus (Keyserling, 1880), O. trifurcatus (Pocock, 1900c), O. trinitatis Strand, 1916a, O. velox (Simon, 1880), O. ventrosus Nicolet, 1849, O. vitiosus Vellard, 1924 and O. yucatanus Chamberlin, 1925. Seventeen taxa are transferred from Olios to other genera within Sparassidae, eight of them are illustrated: Adcatomus luteus (Keyserling, 1880) comb. nov., Eusparassus flavidus (O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1885) comb. nov., Palystes derasus (C.L. Koch, 1845) comb. nov., Heteropoda similaris (Rainbow, 1898) comb. rev., Remmius variatus (Thorell, 1899) comb. nov., Nolavia audax (Banks, 1909) comb. nov., Nolavia antiguensis (Keyserling, 1880) comb. nov., Nolavia antiguensis columbiensis (Schmidt, 1971) comb. nov., Nolavia fuhrmanni (Strand, 1914) comb. nov., Nolavia helva (Keyserling, 1880) comb. nov., Nolavia stylifer (F.O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1900) comb. nov., Nolavia valenciae (Strand, 1916a) comb. nov., Nungara cayana (Taczanowski, 1872) comb. nov., Polybetes bombilius (F.O. Pickard-Cambridge, 1899) comb. nov., Polybetes fasciatus (Keyserling, 1880) comb. nov., Polybetes hyeroglyphicus (Mello-Leitão, 1918) comb. nov. and Prychia paalonga (Barrion & Litsinger, 1995) comb. nov. One species is transferred from Olios to the family Clubionidae Wagner, 1887: Clubiona paenuliformis (Strand, 1916a) comb. nov.

A checklist of all described species of Philonthina, a subtribe of the staphylinid tribe Staphylinini, known to occur in Central and South America (CASA) is presented. Included for each species, and for synonyms known from CASA, is a reference to the original description, type locality and type depository, and for each species the known distribution within and outside CASA. Type material was sought in the main European and American collections where it is deposited (BMNH, MNHUB, IRSNB and FMNH) and is summarized for all indigenous CASA species, with lectotypes designated for 16 names and confirmation of holotypes and prior designation of lectotypes when necessary. Based on recent phylogenetic work in Philonthina and our revision of types of CASA species of Philonthus Stephens, 1829 and Belonuchus Nordmann, 1837, some taxonomic changes are proposed. Thirty-one species of Philonthus are transferred to Belonuchus (16), Gabrius Stephens 1829 (14), and Bisnius Stephens 1829 (one) resulting in the following new combinations: B. abnormalis (Sharp 1885), B. celatus (Sharp 1885), B. corticalis (Sharp 1885), B. extremus (Sharp 1885), B. infimus (Sharp 1885), B. iteratus (Sharp 1887), B. latecinctus (Sharp 1885), B. lucilius (Sharp 1885), B. muticus (Sharp 1876), B. optatus (Sharp 1885), B. platypterus (Sharp 1885), B. rufiventris (Sharp 1887), B. rufocaudus (Sharp 1885), B. rufopygus (Sharp 1885), B. serraticornis (Sharp 1876), B. supernus (Herman 2001), G. approximans (Sharp 1885), G. armatipes (Sharp 1885), G. atricolor (Sharp 1885), G. championi (Sharp 1885), G. dampfi (Bernhauer 1929), G. elegans (Sharp 1885), G. forsterianus (Scheerpeltz 1960), G. misellus (Sharp 1885), G. nugax (Sharp 1885), G. ovaticeps (Sharp 1885), G. peruvianus (Bernhauer 1916), G. planulatus (Sharp 1885), G. rusticus (Sharp 1885), G. serpens (Sharp 1885) and Bi. subaeneipennis (Bernhauer 1916). Endeius nitidipennis Solier 1849 is transferred to Gabrius, resulting in the following new combination, G. nitidipennis (Solier 1849). Leptopeltus carchiensis Chani-Posse & Asenjo 2013 is proposed as junior synonym of Philonthus divisus Sharp 1891, which is transferred to Leptopeltus Bernhauer 1906 resulting in a new combination: Leptopeltus divisus (Sharp 1891). Belonuchus penetrans Silvestri 1946 is transferred to Pridonius Blackwelder 1952 as a new combination. Lectotypes are designated for Atopocentrum mirabile Bernhauer 1906, Philonthus armatipes Sharp 1885, Ph. atricolor Sharp 1885, Ph. championi Sharp 1885, Ph. misellus Sharp 1885, Ph. planulatus Sharp 1885, Ph. rusticus Sharp 1885, Ph. serpens Sharp 1885, Ph. abnormalis Sharp 1885, Ph. celatus Sharp 1885, Ph. infimus Sharp 1885, Ph. latecinctus Sharp 1885, Ph. muticus Sharp 1876, Ph. platypterus Sharp 1885, Ph. rufocaudus Sharp 1885 and Ph. rufopygus Sharp 1885. Of the 543 currently known species of Philonthina reported from CASA, at least 14 are believed to be adventive from elsewhere, 56 may occur naturally elsewhere, and 473 (87%) are evidently endemic to this region. Of the 31 genera represented by these described species, 20 (65%) are endemic to CASA. One genus, Gabronthus Tottenham 1955, is adventive. However, the actual philonthine fauna of CASA will undoubtedly be much larger, and the generic composition highly modified, when the fauna is fully explored and studied within a phylogenetical framework.

Tulkaa minun tyköni oli 1800- ja 1900-lukujen vaihteen kirkossakävijöille tuttu, ilmeisen pidetty ja sanomaltaan helposti omaksuttava aihe. Se oli Kirkastuksen ohella suosituimpia alttaritauluaiheita 1880-luvun Suomessa. Aikakauden tuotteliain alttaritaulutaiteilija Alexandra Frosterus-Såltin (1837–1916) maalasi motiivin kymmenen kertaa, eli melkein puolet kaikista aihepiirin alttaritauluista. Kuva-aihe perustuu Raamatun kohtaan, jossa Jeesus kutsuu luokseen ”työtä tekeviä ja raskautettuja” ihmisiä, antaa heidän sielulleen levon ja kehottaa heitä ottamaan itsestään oppia. Monet aihepiirin teoksista olivat ulkomaisten esikuvien reproduktioita tai muunnelmia. Keskeiset esikuvat kuva-aiheen toisinnoille ovat tanskalaisten Carl Blochin (1834–1890) ja Bertel Thorvaldsenin (1768/1770–1844) teokset, jotka levisivät myös painokuvina kaikkialle protestanttiseen Eurooppaan.Tässä artikkelissa tarkastelen Tulkaa minun tyköni -aihetta, ensin yleisesti ja sitten erityistapauksena Alexandra Frosterus-Såltinin Nakkilan kirkon alttaritaulua (1891), Aby Warburgin (1866–1929) ajatuksiin pohjautuvan, warburgilaista terminologiaa hyödyntävän ikonografisen lähestymistavan soveltamisen näkökulmasta. Tarkoitukseni ei ole analysoida Warburgin tekstejä tai uudelleen määritellä itse käsitteistöä. Tavoitteenani on arvioida empiirisesti ikonografisen käsitteistön käyttökelpoisuutta kuva-aiheen ja sitä kautta kristillisen taiteen tulkinnassa. Tiettyjen eleiden ja asentojen kuvaustavan suosio on hyvä esimerkki warburgilaisesta kuvien vaellushistoriasta, jossa selkeästi tunnetta kuvaavat ja siten käyttökelpoiset elemuodot, erityisesti voimakkaita emootiotiloja välittävät tunneilmaisut, paatosmuodot, avainteemat ja kuvatyypit kulkevat ja nousevat esille uudestaan hieman muuttuneina. Tulkaa minun tyköni -aiheen kohdalla tosin kyse on enemmän maantieteellisestä levinneisyydestä kuin ajallisesta vaeltamisesta.

Christine Desan of Harvard Law School reviews “Constitutional Money: A Review of the Supreme Court's Monetary Decisions”, by Richard H. Timberlake. The Econlit abstract of this book begins: “Reviews ten U.S. Supreme Court cases and decisions that dealt with monetary laws and presents a summary history of monetary events and policies as they were affected by the Court's decisions. Discusses the current condition of monetary affairs in the United States; the emergence of money in civilized societies; the bimetallic monetary system and appearance of a national bank; McCulloch v. Maryland, 1819; Congress's power ““to coin money and regulate the value thereof …”; Craig v. Missouri, 1830; Briscoe v. The Bank of the Commonwealth of Kentucky, 1837; federal government issues of Treasury notes and greenbacks; the track of the legal tender bills through Congress; Bronson v. Rodes, 1868; Veazie Bank v. Fenno, 1869; Hepburn v. Griswold, 1870—the legal tender issue; Knox v. Lee and Parker v. Davis—reversal of Hepburn; monetary affairs in the United States, 1871–83; the third legal tender case—Juilliard v. Greenman, 1884; commentaries on the legal tender decisions—the issue of sovereignty; other commentaries on the legal tender cases; the (Gold) Currency Act of 1900 and monetary affairs in the United States before 1914; the Federal Reserve System, 1914–29; the Great Contraction, 1929–33; gold—where did it go, and why didn't the gold standard work?; the Gold Clause cases, 1934–35; gold and monetary affairs in the twentieth century; and a constitutional monetary system. Timberlake is Emeritus Professor of Economics at the University of Georgia and Adjunct Scholar at the Cato Institute.”