Journal articles on the topic '1847-1896'

Currently with 85 named species, the family Platyrhacidae in America is still poorly studied, particularly regarding Barydesmus Cook, 1896, the most diversified among the American genera. The center of diversification of Barydesmus lies in the northern third of the Andes Mountains, a megadiverse region where surely more species of these large, conspicuous diplopods await description. Here we present a new species, Barydesmus nangaritza sp. nov., easily diagnosable by the shape of the paranota, unique among the American Platyrhacidae. We provide also an updated bibliographical, annotated checklist of the whole family in America, with the aim of encouraging further studies in the group. The checklist includes the following new combinations under the genus Barydesmus: Barydesmus acanthopleurus (Hoffman, 1960) comb. nov., B. acanthosternus (Brölemann, 1900) comb. nov., B. acompus (Chamberlin, 1941) comb. nov., B. aequinoctius (Attems, 1914) comb. nov., B. affinis (Brölemann, 1919) comb. nov., B. andinus (Cook, 1896) comb. nov., B. azulae (Kraus, 1956) comb. nov., B. balsapuertus (Chamberlin, 1941) comb. nov., B. bifasciatus (Silvestri, 1897) comb. nov., B. bombonus (Chamberlin, 1941) comb. nov., B. broelemanni (Attems, 1914) comb. nov., B. brunnior (Chamberlin, 1941) comb. nov., B. celinus (Chamberlin, 1941) comb. nov., B. chuncho (Chamberlin, 1941) comb. nov., B. clathratus (Gervais, 1847) comb. nov., B. comptus Cook, 1896 comb. nov., B. contayus (Chamberlin, 1941) comb. nov., B. dunalii (Gervais, 1847) comb. nov., B. exsul (Cook, 1896) comb. nov., B. festae (Silvestri, 1897) comb. nov., B. fuscatus (Chamberlin, 1941) comb. nov., B. helophorus (Attems, 1899) comb. nov., B. incus (Chamberlin, 1941) comb. nov., B. javarynus (Schubart, 1950) comb. nov., B. leucus (Chamberlin, 1941) comb. nov., B. loretus (Chamberlin, 1941) comb. nov., B. manserichus (Chamberlin, 1941) comb. nov., B. medius (Chamberlin, 1941) comb. nov., B. obscurus (Kraus, 1955) comb. nov., B. orellanus (Chamberlin, 1941) comb. nov., B. pococki (Brölemann, 1911) comb. nov., B. retentus (Chamberlin, 1941) comb. nov., B. riparius (Carl, 1902) comb. nov., B. rufipes (Koch, 1847) comb. nov., B. scaber (Koch, 1847) comb. nov., B. socius (Chamberlin, 1941) comb. nov., B. strenuus (Silvestri, 1897) comb. nov., B. tambonus (Chamberlin, 1952) comb. nov., B. tapichus (Chamberlin, 1941) comb. nov., B. trichotypus (Chamberlin, 1941) comb. nov., B. utoquinius (Chamberlin, 1941) comb. nov. and B. zygethus (Chamberlin, 1941) comb. nov.

Clara Schumann, née Wieck (1819–1896), and Fanny Hensel, née Mendelssohn Bartholdy (1805–1847), were among the outstanding women musicians of their time. Both kept diaries that still exist, and from these we can learn a great deal about the inner and outer lives of the two women. Fanny Hensel's diaries were originally used by her son Sebastian for his book Die Familie Mendelssohn, 1729–1847. He gave us her life story as seen through his eyes, and furnished the major information available about his mother until the recent publication of her diaries: Fanny Hensel, Tagebücher. This book was based on the diary manuscripts acquired by the Mendelssohn Archive of the Berlin Staatsbibliothek in 1969, 1970 and 1999. Fanny Hensel's Tagebücher cover the years 1829 to 1847, thus from the year of her marriage to the year of her death.

The history and original concept of Parygrus Erichson, 1847, is reviewed, the genus is redescribed, and the status of the type species, P. erichsoni Waterhouse, 1876, is clarified. The four original species are reviewed, with photographs provided for the type specimens of P. angustatus Grouvelle, 1896, P. elateroides Grouvelle, 1896, and P. erichsoni, and a non-type of P. parallelus (Grouvelle, 1890). The holotype of P. parallelus is apparently missing. The female holotype of P. erichsoni is redescribed. An associated male P. erichsoni specimen is compared with the holotype and the male genitalia are described and illustrated. General descriptions and provisional diagnoses are given for P. angustatus, P. elateroides and P. parallelus. Five new species (P. guarani new species, P. lengua new species, P. maya new species, P. quechua new species, P. zamuco new species) are proposed, illustrated, and their geographic distributions mapped. For the first time, the male genitalia of Parygrus species are described and illustrated. A provisional key to the species and an updated key to the Neotropical genera of Dryopidae are provided.

This work presents the length-weight relationships of 14 species of fish of the Napo River basin. Fish collections were carried out between 2012 and 2014, using gill nets and seine. A total of 1896 specimens, belonging to 14 species and five orders were analyzed. The allometric coefficient b ranged from 2.69 to 3.78. A new record of length-weight relationship is presented for Curimata cisandina (Allen, 1942). The comparisons with other Amazonian studies indicated differences in the parameters a and b of LWR with this study for the species Triportheus angulatus (Spix & Agassiz, 1829), Mylossoma duriventre (Cuvier, 1818), Roeboides myersii Gill, 1870 and Pellona castenaena Valenciennes, 1847 and only parameter b for Psectrogaster amazonica. The results presented in this work contribute to a better knowledge of fish resources in the region of the Peruvian Amazon, especially in the Napo River basin.

The article provides the list of Macroheterocera (Lepidoptera), collected in Mongolia in two expeditions of Russian entomologists in 2019. The first travel (September 14−24) − Bayan-Ulgii, Khovd, and Gobi-Altai Aimaks; the second travel (June 24 – July 5) − Uvurkhangai, Bayanhongor, and Töw Aimaks. 21 species are indicated for the fauna of Mongolia for the first time: Idaea elongaria (Rambur, 1833) (Geometridae), Orgyia dubia (Tauscher, 1806), Thylacigyna antiquoides (Hübner, 1822), Ivela ochropoda (Eversmann, 1847), Catocala deducta Eversmann, 1843, C. desiderata Staudinger, 1888, C. neglecta Staudinger, 1888, (Püngeler, 1906), Autophila vespertalis (Staudinger, 1896) (Erebidae), Acronicta tridens ([Denis & Schiffermüller], 1775), Caradrina expansa Alphéraky, 1887, C. inopinata Hacker, 2004, Polymixis atossa (Wiltshire, 1941), P. rosinae (Bohatsch, 1908), Dasypolia maria Volynkin, 2012, Pseudohadena argyllostigma (Varga & L.Ronkay, 1991), Ctenoceratoda turpis (Staudinger, 1900), Mythimna l-album (Linnaeus, 1767), M. vitellina (Hübner, 1808), Dichagyris flammatra ([Denis & Schiffermüller], 1775), Agrotis psammocharis Boursin, 1950, Eugnorisma atrabaelbops Varga, 1975 (Noctuidae).

In Mexico, the newportiine scolopocryptopid genus Newportia Gervais, 1847, comprises 10 species: N. mexicana (Saussure, 1858); N. azteca Humbert & Saussure, 1869; N. stolli (Pocock, 1896); N. spinipes Pocock, 1896; N. oreina Chamberlin, 1915; N. sabina and pelaezi, both by Chamberlin, 1942; N. atoyaca and morela, both by Chamberlin, 1943, and N. troglobia, n. sp. The last occurs in caves in Tamaulipas and appears to be an obligate troglobite; N. sabina, known only from caves in San Luis Potosi, is redescribed and illustrated. Newportia azteca is revived and returned to its rightful position as the third oldest name in the genus; despite having priority by 27 years, it had been considered to be “the same” as N. spinipes and dropped from nomenclature. Although Newportia and the Newportiinae are not known from the continental United States, they do inhabit the country’s territories in the Caribbean; N. heteropoda Chamberlin, 1918, is reported from Puerto Rico, and N. longitarsis virginiensis Lewis, 1989, is recorded from St. Thomas and St. Croix, US Virgin Islands, and Tortola and Virgin Gorda, British Virgin Islands. The northernmost Mexican record, of N. pelaezi in Nuevo León, is only 96 mi (154 km) south of the US border, suggesting that the taxa may potentially be discovered in the southern periphery of Texas; likewise, rafting from Cuba, where 4–5 species occur, could bring them to the Florida Keys. New localities from Mexico are presented for N. stolli, N. spinipes, N. oreina, N. atoyaca, and N. morela, and ranges are depicted on a distribution map.

The limits of Lyrcus Walker (1842), Catolaccus Thomson (1878), Eurydinoteloides Girault (1913a), Trimeromicrus Gahan (1914), and Jaliscoa Bouček (1993) are re-evaluated and redefined to better reflect observed distribution of morphological features. Nine of 13 New World species of Catolaccus are transferred to other genera and photographs of the primary type specimens are given to assist future recognition. New features are provided to assist identification of the remaining four Nearctic species of Catolaccus and these are compared to European species, with the observation that C. kansensis (Girault 1917c) could be a junior synonym of C. crassiceps (Masi 1911). Trimeromicrus is removed from synonymy under Lyrcus for the single species T. maculatus Gahan (1914) rev. comb. Newly synonymized under Lyrcus is the Australasian genus Neocylus Bouček (1988) n. syn. Ten species are newly transferred to Lyrcus—L. nigraeneus (Girault 1915) n. comb. (from Neocylus), L. helice (Walker 1843) n. comb. and L. cyaneus (Girault 1911) n. comb. (from Catolaccus), and L. albiclavus (Girault 1917c) n. comb., L. capitis (Burks 1955) n. comb., L. chalcis (Burks 1955) n. comb., L. coeliodis (Ashmead 1896) n. comb., L. deuterus (Crawford 1911) n. comb., L. nigroaeneus (Ashmead 1894a) n. comb. and L. rosaecolis (Burks 1955) n. comb. (from Zatropis Crawford 1908). Catolaccus pallipes Ashmead (1894b) is newly transferred to Pteromalus Swederus (1795) as Pteromalus pallipes (Ashmead) n. comb. and Catolaccus fragariae Rohwer (1934) to Lariophagus Crawford (1909) as Lariophagus fragariae (Rohwer) n. comb. Nine species are newly transferred to Eurydinoteloides—E. tepicensis (Ashmead 1895) n. comb. (from Catolaccus), E. dymnus (Walker 1847) n. comb., E. hermeas (Walker 1847) n. comb., E. incerta (Ashmead 1893) n. comb., E. orontas (Walker 1847) n. comb., E. perdubia (Girault 1916) n. comb., E. platensis (De Santis in De Santis et al. 1979) n. comb. and E. timaea (Walker 1847) n. comb. (from Lyrcus), and E. eudubia (Özdikmen 2011) n. comb. (from Spintherus Thomson 1878). Four species are newly transferred to Jaliscoa—J. grandis (Burks 1954) n. comb. and J. hunteri (Crawford 1908) n. comb. (from Catolaccus), and J. townsendi (Crawford 1912) n. comb. and J. vulgaris (Ashmead 1894b) n. comb. (from Pteromalus). The species of Jaliscoa are revised to include J. nudipennis Bouček 1993, J. bouceki n. sp., J. hunteri and J. vulgaris. Re-established in synonymy under J. hunteri is J. townsendi n. comb. One new species of Pteromalus, P. grisselli n. sp., is described as an egg predator in the egg sacs of Dictyna coloradensi Chamberlin (Araneae: Dictynidae) and compared to Catolaccus species and other pteromalids that are predators of spider eggs. Lectotypes are designated for Pteromalus helice Walker (1843), Catolaccus pallipes Ashmead (1894b) and Catolaccus vulgaris Ashmead (1894b). Diagnoses are given to differentiate Catolaccus, Eurydinoteloides, Jaliscoa, Lyrcus and Trimeromicrus from each other, and more extensive descriptions given to help differentiate these genera from other Pteromalinae. Morphological features are illustrated through macrophotography and scanning electron photomicrography.

Sand dollars in the Monophorasteridae Lahille, 1896, form an important part of the South American Cenozoic echinoid fauna. Re-examination of type and other material adds significantly to our knowledge of the morphology and taxonomy of the family, and shows that besides Monophoraster darwini (Desor, 1847), M. duboisi (Cotteau, 1884), Amplaster coloniensis Martínez, 1984, and A. alatus Rossi de Garcia and Levy, 1989, there is a new species, A. ellipticus. We also show that Karlaster Marchesini Santos, 1958, is not a monophorasterid as once thought. A phylogenetic analysis of 24 characters assessed from all species of Monophoraster Lambert and Thiéry, 1921, and Amplaster Martínez, 1984, along with genera of the Mellitidae Stefanini, 1912, produced a single most parsimonious tree. The analysis demonstrates monophyly of mellitids and monophorasterids, and that Iheringiella Berg, 1898, should be excluded from the latter. Although both Monophoraster Lambert and Thiéry, 1921, and Amplaster Martínez, 1984, retain many features of an ancestor in common with the Mellitidae Stefanini, 1912, they also exhibit bizarre morphologies quite different from those of mellitids. The study has also resulted in a clearer picture of the biogeography and biostratigraphy of the Monophorasteridae, and their great significance in the evolution of lunulate sand dollars in the Americas.

Objective: To evaluate the knowledge, believes, psychological and behavioural impact of COVID-19 on the general population in the Middle East, exploring how it impacted public lives. Methods: A descriptive cross-sectional online survey was sent to a convenience sample in the Middle East through social media (Facebook and WhatsApp) between 16th of June and 30th of June 2020. The questionnaire was designed to collect the demographic, participant’s source of information regarding COVID-19, knowledge and believes about COVID-19, the psychological consequences of COVID-19, impact of COVID-19 on participant’s behaviour. The final version of the questionnaire was further tested for content validity by experts in the field. Results: A total of 2,061 participants completed the survey, with the majority being females (n=1394, 67.6%), from urban areas (n=1896, 92%) and the majority were from countries of The Levant (n=1199, 58.1%), followed by the Arabian Peninsula (n=392, 19.1%), Iraq (n=300, 14.6%) and Egypt (n=138, 6.7%). Few participants (3.0%) reported to have been infected and many (n=1847, 89.6%) were committed to quarantine at home. Social media platforms were the most common sources of information (41.2%). Many (63%) believed that COVID-19 is a biological weapon and were afraid of visiting crowded places (85%). The majority avoided public facilities (86.9%) such as prayer places and believed that the news about COVID-19 made them anxious (49.5%).

AbstractWhen the new building of the Burgtheater on the Viennese Ringstrasse was inaugurated in 1888, the Austrian art historian Albert Ilg wrote a series of newspaper articles in which he praised the arrangement of the interior and its creator Carl Hasenauer, but devoted only a few critical words to the façade without even mentioning the name of the architect, Gottfried Semper. These articles are, with others, typical of Ilg's negative assessment of the architecture of the Ringstrasse, but for a full understanding of Ilg's stance it is necessary to relate it to his general positions on the history of art and politics. This article reveals that Ilg's position was not primarily motivated by aesthetic principles, but by identity politics, especially by his belief that the Baroque style was the only appropriate, supranational architectural style for the Habsburg monarchy.

A 45 km wide, shear-zone-bounded segment of the northwestern Makkovik Province, Labrador, is underlain by Archean gneisses derived from the adjacent Nain craton. This lithotectonic block (Kaipokok domain) was reworked at high metamorphic grade, overthrust by supracrustal sequences (Lower Aillik and Moran Lake groups), and intruded by granitoid plutons during the Paleoproterozoic. Initial amphibolite-facies reworking of the Kaipokok domain at 1896 ± 6 Ma is indicated by U–Pb ages of metamorphic zircon from a foliated Kikkertavak metadiabase dyke. This is one of the oldest Paleoproterozoic tectonic events dated thus far in northeast Laurentia and may be linked with ca. 1890 Ma plutonism documented elsewhere in the Kaipokok domain. Intrusion of granitoid plutons at [Formula: see text], 1877 ± 5, and [Formula: see text] in the Kaipokok Bay area postdates early thick- and thin-skinned thrusting (possibly east to northeast directed) that involved Lower Aillik Group strata. U–Pb titanite ages of 1866–1847 Ma in part record a metamorphic event that followed this plutonic–tectonic activity. These early events are temporally and kinematically difficult to reconcile with accretion of juvenile Makkovikian terranes in the southeast and may instead be related to early stages of the ca. 1.91–1.72 Ga Torngat orogeny along the western margin of the Nain craton. In contrast, high-grade metamorphism, dextral shearing, and northwestward thrusting between 1841 and 1784 Ma, including crystallization of an Iggiuk granitic vein at 1811 ± 8 Ma, are in accord with accretion of Makkovikian terranes in a dextral transpressional regime (Makkovikian orogeny sensu stricto). Coeval sinistral transpression in the Torngat orogen suggests that both otogenic belts accommodated relative northward tectonic escape of the Nain craton during this interval.

Abstract The discussion of floods in this paper covers the section of the Odra River basin from its source down to the mouth of the Nysa Klodzka River and the section of the Vistula River basin down to the Krakow profile. The area of the upper part of Odra River basin is 13,455 km2 and the length of the river bed in this section is ca. 273.0 km. In the reach examined, the Vistula River is 184.8 km long and has a catchment area of approximately 8,101 km2. Geographical and environmental conditions in the upper part of the Vistula and Odra Rivers basins are conducive to floods both in the summer and winter seasons. The analyses conducted for the 19th and 20th centuries demonstrate that two main types of floods can be distinguished. Floods with a single flood wave peak occurred in the following years in the upper Odra River basin: 1813, 1831, 1879, 1889, 1890 and 1896, and on the Vistula River they were recorded in 1805, 1813, 1816, 1818, 1826, 1830, 1834, 1844 and 1845. In the 20th century, similar phenomena were recorded on the Odra River in 1903, 1909, 1911, 1915, 1925, 1960, 1970 and 1985, and on the Vistula River they occurred in 1903, 1908, 1925, 1931, 1934, 1939, 1948, 1951, 1970, 1972, 1991, 1996, 1997 and 1999. The second category includes floods with two, three or more flood wave peaks. These are caused by successive episodes of high rainfall separated by dry periods that last for a few days, a fortnight or even several weeks. Such floods occurred on the upper Odra River in 1847, 1854, 1880, 1888, 1892, 1897 and 1899; while on the Vistula River only two (1839 and 1843) floods featured two flood wave peaks. In the 20th century on the upper Odra River, floods of this type occurred in 1902, 1926, 1939, 1940, 1972, 1977 and 1997; on the upper Vistula River, they were recorded in 1906, 1915, 1919, 1920, 1940, 1958, 1960 and 1987.

Die Lectotypen der folgenden Arten wurden festgelegt: Dodecastichus heydeni Stierlin, 1861; Otiorhynchus (Acunotus) lutosus Stierlin, 1858; O. (Amosilnus) oberti Faust, (1886); O. (Arammichnus) dobrutschae Stierlin, 1882; O. (Aranihus) misellus Stierlin, 1861; O. (Aranihus) riguus Stierlin, 1883; O. (Choilisanus) affinis Hochhuth, 1847; O. (Choilisanus) caroli Stierlin, 1893; O. (Choilisanus) caucasicus Stierlin, 1872; O. (Choilisanus) schoenherri Stierlin, 1877; O. (Choilisanus) viridisetosus Stierlin, 1905; O. (Egydelenus) jaltensis Formanek, 1926; O. (Elechranus) banaticus Stierlin, 1861; O. (Elechranus) chalceus Stierlin, 1861; O. (Elechranus) roubali Penecke, 1931; O. (Ergiferanus) mus Stierlin, 1862; O. (Lolatismus) chaudoiri Hochhuth, 1851; O. (Lolatismus) depressus Stierlin, 1875; O. (Melasemnus) brevipennis Stierlin, 1892; O. (Melasemnus) crucirostris Hochhuth, 1851; O. (Meriplodus) laconicus Kirsch, 1880; O. (Mitomiris) astutus (Faust, 1886); O. (Mitomiris) laniger Faust, 1887; O. (Namertanus) pseudomias Hochhuth, 1847; O. (Nihus) proximus Stierlin, 1861; O. (Nubidanus) punctirostris Stierlin, 1883; O. (Nubidanus) ruminalis Faust, 1894; O. (Osmobodes) rutilipes Hochhuth, 1851; O. (Osmobodes) tenuimanus Faust, 1890; O. (Osmobodes) venalis Faust, 1888; O. (Otiomimus) desbrochersi Stierlin, 1883; O. (Otiorhynchus) amabilis Stierlin, 1861; O. (Otiorhynchus) auropupillatus Stierlin, 1861; O. (Otiorhynchus) delatus Faust, 1899; O. (Otiorhynchus) latissimus Stierlin, 1861; O. (Otiorhynchus) scaberrimus Stierlin, 1861; O. (Otiorhynchus) steppensis Faust, 1888; O. (Otismotilus) auroguttatus Stierlin, 1879; O. (Paracryphiphorus) nuncius Faust, 1890; O. (Petalorrhynchus) crinitarsis Stierlin, 1861; O. (Phalantorrhynchus) patruelis Stierlin, 1861; O. (Phalantorrhynchus) planidorsis Stierlin, 1886; O. (Pliadonus) schneideri Stierlin, 1876; O. (Tournieria) siewersi Faust, 1888; O. (Podonebistus) alaianus Stierlin, 1886; O. (Podonebistus) bleusei Faust, 1899; O. (Podonebistus) cylindricus Stierlin, 1877; O. (Podonebistus) nefandus Faust, 1888; O. (Podonebistus) prostratus Heyden, 1886; O. (Podonebistus) subparallelus Stierlin, 1893; O. (Prototis) popovi Faust, 1888; O. (Provadilus) carbonarius Hochhuth, 1847; O. (Pseudocryphiphorus) argillosus Hochhuth, 1851; O. (Pseudocryphiphorus) irritabilis (Faust, 1886); O. (Pseudocryphiphorus) zebei Stierlin, 1861; O. (Rimenostolus) auripes Stierlin, 1875; O. (Rusnepranus) arenosus Stierlin, 1861; O. (Rusnepranus) heerii Stierlin, 1858; O. (Stupamacus) erroneus (Faust, 1886); O. (Stupamacus) infensus Faust, 1888; O. (Stupamacus) pilosulus Penecke, 1928; O. (Tournieria) cornicinus Stierlin, 1861; O. (Tournieria) emgei Stierlin, 1887; O. (Tournieria) lubriculus Faust, 1890; O. (Udonedus) koenigi Faust, 1888; O. (Urorrhynchus) truncatus Stierlin, 1861; O. (Zariedus) hystericus Faust, 1892; O. (Zariedus) sedulus Faust, 1894. Neotypen von O. (Amosilnus) pityophilus Gistel, 1857 und von O. (Postaremus) gelidus Gistel, 1857 wurden ausgewählt. Die folgenden neuen Synonyme (Synonyme in eckigen Klammern) wurden begründet: O. velutinus Germar, 1824 [= O. desbrochersi Stierlin, 1896 (nicht O. desbrochersi Stierlin, 1883)]; O. laconicus Kirsch, 1880 [= O. oertzeni Stierlin, 1883]; O. nodosus (O. F. Müller, 1754) [= O. gelidus Gistel, 1857]; O. lavandus Germar, 1824 [= O. pityophilus Gistel, 1857]; O. proximus Stierlin, 1861 [= O. depilis Smreczynski, 1959]; O. parvicollis Gyllenhal, 1834 [= O. riguus Stierlin, 1883]; O. caucasicus Stierlin, 1872 [= O. viridisetosus Stierlin, 1905]. Otiorhynchus erroneus (Faust, 1886) erhielt einen neuen Status. Otiorhynchus affinis Hochhuth ist kein Synonym von O. incivilis Faldermann, 1838; O. auroguttatus Stierlin ist kein Synonym von O. heerii Stierlin, 1858 und ist zu übertragen aus O. (Rusnepranus) Reitter, 1912 in O. (Otismotilus) Reitter, 1912. Neue Kombinationen sind: Otiorhynchus (Rimenostolus) auripes Stierlin aus O. (Panorosemus) Reitter, 1913; O. (Rusnepranus) heerii Stierlin aus O. (Otismotilus) Reitter, 1912; O. (Stupamacus) infensus Faust aus O. (Microphalantus) Reitter, 1912; O. (Elechranus) roubali Penecke aus O. (Cryphiphorus) Stierlin, 1883; O. (Pliadonus) siewersi Faust, 1888 aus O. (Melasemnus) Reitter, 1912; O. (Podonebistus) alaianus Stierlin, O. (Cryphiphorus) argillosus Hochhuth, O. (Lolatismus) depressus Stierlin, O. (Ergiferanus) mus Stierlin, O. (Podonebistus) prostratus Heyden, O. (Pliadonus) schneideri Stierlin, und O. (Osmobodes) venalis Faust, alle diese sind als species incertae sedis aufgelisted.Nomenklatorische Handlungenheydeni (Stierlin, 1861) (Dodecastichus), Lectotype described as Otiorhynchus heydenidebilis Smreczynski, 1959 (Otiorhynchus), syn. n. of Otiorhynchus (Nihus) proximus Stierlin, 1861oertzeni Stierlin, 1883 (Otiorhynchus), syn. n. of Otiorhynchus (Meriplodus) laconicus Kirsch, 1880lutosus Siterlin, 1858 (Otiorhynchus (Acunotus)), Lectotypeoberti (Faust, 1886) (Otiorhynchus (Amosilnus)), Lectotype described as Brachyrrhinus obertipityophilus Gistel, 1857 (Otiorhynchus (Amosilnus)), Neotype; syn. n. of Otiorhynchus lavander Germar, 1824dobrutschae Stierlin, 1882 (Otiorhynchus (Arammichnus)), Lectotypemisellus Stierlin, 1861 (Otiorhynchus (Aranihus)), Lectotyperiguus Stierlin, 1883 (Otiorhynchus (Aranihus)), Lectotype; syn. n. of Otiorhynchus parvicollis Gyllenhal, 1834affinis Hochhuth, 1847 (Otiorhynchus (Choilisanus)), Lectotype; stat. rev. now a valid speciescaroli Stierlin, 1893 (Otiorhynchus (Choilisanus)), Lectotypecaucasicus Stierlin, 1872 (Otiorhynchus (Choilisanus)), Lectotypeschoenherri Stierlin, 1877 (Otiorhynchus (Choilisanus)), Lectotype now a synonym of Otiorhynchus caucasicus Stierlin, 1872viridisetosus Stierlin, 1905 (Otiorhynchus (Choilisanus)), Lectotype; syn. n. of Otiorhynchus caucasicus Stierlin, 1872jaltensis Formanek, 1926 (Otiorhynchus (Egydelenus)), Lectotypebanaticus Stierlin, 1861 (Otiorhynchus (Elechranus)), Lectotypechalceus Stierlin, 1861 (Otiorhynchus (Elechranus)), Lectotyperoubali Penecke, 1931 (Otiorhynchus (Elechranus)), Lectotype; comb. n. hitherto Otiorhynchus (Cryphiphorus) roubalimus Stierlin, 1862 (Otiorhynchus (Ergiferanus)), Lectotype; comb. n. hitherto Otiorhynchus muschaudoiri Hochhuth, 1851 (Otiorhynchus (Lolatismus)), Lectotypedepressus Stierlin, 1875 (Otiorhynchus (Lolatismus)), Lectotype; comb. n. hitherto Otiorhynchus depressusbrevipennis Stierlin, 1892 (Otiorhynchus (Melasemnus)), Lectotypecrucirostris Hochhuth, 1851 (Otiorhynchus (Melasemnus)), Lectotype now a synonym of Otiorhynchus ovalipennis Boheman, 1843laconicus Kirsch, 1880 (Otiorhynchus (Meriplodus)), Lectotypeastutus (Faust, 1886) (Otiorhynchus (Mitomiris)), Lectotype described as Brachyrrhinus (Tournieria) astutuslaniger Faust, 1887 (Otiorhynchus (Mitomiris)), Lectotypepseudomias Hochhuth, 1847 (Otiorhynchus (Namertanus)), Lectotypeproximus Stierlin, 1861 (Otiorhynchus (Nihus)), Lectotypepunctirostris Stierlin, 1883 (Otiorhynchus (Nubidanus)), Lectotyperuminalis Faust, 1894 (Otiorhynchus (Nubidanus)), Lectotyperutilipes Hochhuth, 1851 (Otiorhynchus (Osmobodes)), Lectotype now a synonym of Otiorhynchus cribrosicollis Boheman, 1843tenuimanus Faust, 1890 (Otiorhynchus (Osmobodes)), Lectotypevernalis Faust, 1888 (Otiorhynchus (Osmobodes)), Lectotype; comb. n. hitherto Otiorhynchus vernalisdesbrochersi Stierlin, 1883 (Otiorhynchus (Otiomimus)), Lectotypeamabilis Stierlin, 1861 (Otiorhynchus (Otiorhynchus)), Lectotype now a synonym of Otiorhynchus amplipennis Fairmaire, 1859auropupillatus Stierlin, 1861 (Otiorhynchus (Otiorhynchus)), Lectotypedelatus Faust, 1899 (Otiorhynchus (Otiorhynchus)), Lectotypelatissimus Stierlin, 1861 (Otiorhynchus (Otiorhynchus)), Lectotypescaberrimus Stierlin, 1861 (Otiorhynchus (Otiorhynchus)), Lectotypesteppensis Faust, 1888 (Otiorhynchus (Otiorhynchus)), Lectotype now a synonym of Otiorhynchus concinnus Gyllenhal, 1834auroguttatus Stierlin, 1879 (Otiorhynchus (Otismutilus)), Lectotype; stat. n.; comb. n. now a valid species; hitherto Otiorhynchus (Rusnepranus) auroguttatusnuncius Faust, 1890 (Otiorhynchus (Paracryphiphorus)), Lectotypecrinitarsis Stierlin, 1861 (Otiorhynchus (Petalorrhynchus)), Lectotype now a synonym of Otiorhynchus cupreosparsus (Fairmaire, 1859)patruelis Stierlin, 1861 (Otiorhynchus (Phalantorrhynchus)), Lectotypeplanidorsis Stierlin, 1886 (Otiorhynchus (Phalantorrhynchus)), Lectotype now a synonym of Otiorhynchus moestus Gyllenhal, 1834schneideri Stierlin, 1876 (Otiorhynchus (Pliadonus)), Lectotype; comb. n. hitherto Otiorhynchus schneiderisiewersi Faust, 1888 (Otiorhynchus (Pliadonus)), Lectotype, comb. n. hitrherto Otiorhynchus (Melasemnus) siewersialaianus Stierlin, 1886 (Otiorhynchus (Podonebistus)), Lectotype; comb. n. hitherto Otiorhynchus alaianusbleusei Faust, 1899 (Otiorhynchus (Podonebistus)), Lectotypecylindricus Stierlin, 1877 (Otiorhynchus (Podonebistus)), Lectotypenefandus Faust, 1888 (Otiorhynchus (Podonebistus)), Lectotypeprostratus Heyden, 1886 (Otiorhynchus (Podonebistus)), Lectotype; comb. n. hitherto Otiorhynchus prostratussubparallelus Stierlin, 1893 (Otiorhynchus (Podonebistus)), Lectotype; syn. n. of Otiorhynchus (Podonebistus) cylindricus Stierlin, 1877gelidus Gistel, 1857 (Otiorhynchus (Postaremus)), Neotype; syn. n. of Otiorhyrhynchus nodosus (O. F. Müller, 1754)popovi Faust, 1888 (Otiorhynchus (Prototis)), Lectotypecarbonarius Hochhuth, 1847 (Otiorhynchus (Provadilus)), Lectotypeargillosus Hochhuth, 1851 (Otiorhynchus (Pseudocryphiphorus)), Lectotypeirritabilis (Faust, 1886) (Otiorhynchus (Pseudocryphiphorus)), Lectotype described as Brachyrrhinus irritabiliszebei Stierlin, 1861 (Otiorhynchus (Pseudocryphiphorus)), Lectotypeauripes Stierlin, 1875 (Otiorhynchus (Rimenostolus)), Lectotype; comb. n. hitherto Otiorhynchus (Panorosemus) auripesarenosus Stierlin, 1861 (Otiorhynchus (Rusnepranus)), Lectotypeheerii Stierlin, 1858 (Otiorhynchus (Rusnepranus)), Lectotype; comb. n. hitherto Otiorhynchus (Otismotilus) heeriierroneus (Faust, 1886) (Otiorhynchus (Stupamacus)), Lectotype; stat. n. now a valid speciesinfensus Faust, 1888 (Otiorhynchus (Stupamacus)), Lectotype; comb. n. hitherto Otiorhynchus (Microphalantus) infensuspilosulus Penecke, 1928 (Otiorhynchus (Stupamacus)), Lectotype now a synonym of Otiorhynchus clavalis Apfelbeck, 1922cornicinus Stierlin, 1861 (Otiorhynchus (Tournieria)), Lectotypeemgei Stierlin, 1887 (Otiorhynchus (Tournieria)), Lectotypelubriculus Faust, 1890 (Otiorhynchus (Tournieria)), Lectotypekoenigi Faust, 1888 (Otiorhynchus (Udonedus)), Lectotypetruncatus Stierlin, 1861 (Otiorhynchus (Urorrhynchus)), Lectotypehystericus Faust, 1892 (Otiorhynchus (Zariedus)), Lectotypesedulus Faust, 1894 (Otiorhynchus (Zariedus)), Lectotype

The type material of <em>Feronia</em> <em>cognata</em> Dejean, 1831, <em>Steropus</em> <em>schmidtii</em> Chaudoir, 1838 and <em>Pterostichus</em> <em>placidus</em> W. Rosenhauer, 1847 is examined. This action resulted into new combinations, new synonym, and restored status in terms of the genera <em>Pterostichus</em> Bonelli, 1810 and <em>Tapinopterus</em> Schaum, 1858: <em>Tapinopterus</em> (<em>Tapinopterus</em>) <em>cognatus</em> (Dejean, 1831), <strong>comb. nov</strong>. of <em>Pterostichus</em> (<em>Pseudosteropus</em>) <em>cognatus</em> (Dejean, 1831); <em>Tapinopterus</em> (<em>Tapinopterus</em>) <em>kaufmanni</em> Ganglbauer, 1896, <strong>syn. nov.</strong> of <em>Tapinopterus</em> (<em>Tapinopterus</em>) <em>cognatus</em> (Dejean, 1831); <em>Tapinopterus</em> (<em>Tapinopterus</em>) <em>cognatus</em> <em>transsylvanicus</em> Mandl, 1936, <strong>comb. nov.</strong> of <em>Tapinopterus</em> (<em>Tapinopterus</em>) <em>kaufmanni</em> <em>transsylvanicus</em> Mandl, 1936; <em>Tapinopterus</em> (<em>Tapinopterus</em>) <em>cognatus</em> <em>kalofi­rensis</em> Maran, 1933, <strong>comb. nov</strong>. of <em>Tapinopterus</em> (<em>Tapinopterus</em>) <em>kaufmanni</em> <em>kalofirensis</em> Maran, 1933; <em>Tapinopterus</em> (<em>Tapinopterus</em>) <em>cognatus</em> <em>winkleri</em> Mandl, 1936, <strong>comb. nov.</strong> of <em>Tapinopterus</em> (<em>Tapinopterus</em>) <em>kaufmanni</em> <em>winkleri</em> Mandl, 1936; <em>Steropus schmidtii</em> Chaudoir, 1838 removed from synonymy with <em>Feronia cognata</em> Dejean, 1831 and treated as valid species - <em>Pterostichus</em> (<em>Pseudosteropus</em>) <em>schmidtii</em> (Chaudoir, 1838), <strong>stat. rest.</strong> Lectotype and paralectotypes for<em> Steropus schmidtii</em> Chaudoir, 1838 are designated.

It was noted that during 25 years of scientific and teaching activity N. F. Filatov has made a significant contribution to the development of world Pediatrics. He is the author of over 70 scientific works, including «A short textbook of pediatric diseases» (1893), that was published in 12 editions, and «Clinical lectures» (1900). His monograph «Lectures on acute infectious diseases» (1885) was published in 4 editions, «Semiotics and diagnosis of childhood diseases» (1890) – 9 editions, it istranslated into German, Czech, Italian, Hungarian and French. Many generations of pediatricians have studied on N.F. Filatov’s monographs and manuals. He described the infectious disease named Filatov scarlatinal rubella. Later it was described by the British physician Dukes; one of the presently used names of the disease is Filatov-Dukes disease. In the first edition of «Lectures on infectious diseases» N. F. Filatov described not known until that time infectious mononucleosis, which he called idiopathic inflammation of the cervical lymphatic nodes. The disease is now often called the Filatov’s disease. In 1895 N. F. Filatov, described an important diagnostic sign of measles – the appearance in the catarrhal period of illness of grayish-white lesions on the mucose membrane of lips and cheeks 1–2 days prior to the appearance of rash. As was established later, this sign was first described by A. P. Belsky in 1890, then, independently, by N.F. Filatov, and in 1896 by Koplik. In the literature, this symptom is known as Belsky-Filatov-Koplik spots. N.F. Filatov described the pathogenesis of some forms of oedema syndrome in children, published works on prolonged afebrile forms of the flu. N.F. Filatov was developing a clinical-physiological direction in Pediatrics. He created a large school of native pediatricians. Among his students were famous pediatricians V.I. Molchanov and G.N. Speransky.

Heterobranch specimens of the genus Roxania collected during the Russian expedition (1894) aboard the Turkish steamship Selânik to the Sea of Marmara are found in the collection of the Zoological Institute of the Russian Academy of Sciences (Saint Petersburg). One of the aims of the expedition was investigation of the fauna of the Sea of Marmara including its deepest zone to compare with the Black Sea. In 1896 A.A. Ostroumoff published a report on the expedition. Heterobranch mollusks of the genus Roxania are represented in our material by two lots from the first voyage of the expedition to the archipelago of the Prince Islands. The specimens were identified by K.O. Milaschewitsch as Roxania utriculus (Brocchi, 1814) and “Cryptaxis imperforatus n. sp.”, but a description of the last taxon has not been published. In this study, the specimens labeled by Milachewitch as Cryptaxis imperforatus n. sp. were identified as belonging to Roxania monterosatoi Dautzenberg et H. Fischer, 1896. The species is recorded for the Sea of Marmara for the first time; the description and illustrations of the species are presented. Most species of gastropod mollusks collected during the expedition including all samples of Roxania were represented by empty shells. Taxonomical value of the columella morphology in Roxania species is discussed. Based on this character the species of the genus can be divided into two groups: R. utriculus species group (mouth channeled) and R. monterosatoi species group (mouth without a channel). Morphological and molecular phylogenetic investigations are needed to clarify the status of these two groups.

The article contains the main milestones of life and career of professor Filatov. It was noted that during 25 years of scientific and teaching activity N.F. Filatov has made a significant contribution to the development of world Pediatrics. He is the author of over 70 scientific works, including “a Short textbook of pediatric diseases” (1893), aged 12 editions, and “Clinical lectures” (1900). His monograph “Lectures on acute infectious diseases” (1885) through 4 editions, “Semiotics and diagnosis of childhood diseases” (1890) - 9 editions, it is translated into German, Czech, Italian, Hungarian and French. In the monographs and manuals N.F. Filatov studied many of pokoleniya-pediatricians. He described the infectious disease named Filatov scarlatinal rubella. She was later described by the British physician Duxom; one of the presently used names of the disease - a disease Filatov-Dukes. In the first edition of “Lectures on infectious diseases” N.F. Filatov described is not known until the time of infectious mononucleosis, which he called idiopathic inflammation of the cervical lymphatic glands. The disease is now often called a disease Filatov. In 1895 N. F. Filatov, described an important diagnostic sign of measles is the appearance of catarrhal period of illness 1 - 2 days before appearance of rash spot grayish-white lesions on the mucosa of lips and cheeks. As was established later, this sign was first described by A.P. Belsky in 1890, then regardless of him. F. Filatov, and in 1896 Aplicom. In the literature, this symptom is known as spots Belsky-Filatova-Koplik. N.F. Filatov described the pathogenesis of some forms of edema syndrome in children, published works on prolonged afebrile forms of the flu. N. F. Filatov developed a clinical-physiological direction in Pediatrics. He created a large school of domestic pediatricians. Among his students were V.I. Molchanov and G.N. Speransky.

The article contains the main milestones of life and career of professor Filatov. It was noted that during 25 years of scientific and teaching activity N.F. Filatov has made a significant contribution to the development of world Pediatrics. He is the author of over 70 scientific works, including “a Short textbook of pediatric diseases” (1893), aged 12 editions, and “Clinical lectures” (1900). His monograph “Lectures on acute infectious diseases” (1885) through 4 editions, “Semiotics and diagnosis of childhood diseases” (1890) - 9 editions, it is translated into German, Czech, Italian, Hungarian and French. In the monographs and manuals N.F. Filatov studied many of pokoleniya-pediatricians. He described the infectious disease named Filatov scarlatinal rubella. She was later described by the British physician Duxom; one of the presently used names of the disease - a disease Filatov-Dukes. In the first edition of “Lectures on infectious diseases” N.F. Filatov described is not known until the time of infectious mononucleosis, which he called idiopathic inflammation of the cervical lymphatic glands. The disease is now often called a disease Filatov. In 1895 N. F. Filatov, described an important diagnostic sign of measles is the appearance of catarrhal period of illness 1 - 2 days before appearance of rash spot grayish-white lesions on the mucosa of lips and cheeks. As was established later, this sign was first described by A.P. Belsky in 1890, then regardless of him. F. Filatov, and in 1896 Aplicom. In the literature, this symptom is known as spots Belsky-Filatova-Koplik. N.F. Filatov described the pathogenesis of some forms of edema syndrome in children, published works on prolonged afebrile forms of the flu. N. F. Filatov developed a clinical-physiological direction in Pediatrics. He created a large school of domestic pediatricians. Among his students were V.I. Molchanov and G.N. Speransky.

It was noted that during 25 years of scientific and teaching activity N.F. Filatov has made a significant contribution to the development of world Pediatrics. He is the author of over 70 scientific works, including “a Short textbook of pediatric diseases” (1893), aged 12 editions, and “Clinical lectures” (1900). His monograph “Lectures on acute infectious diseases” (1885) through 4 editions, “Semiotics and diagnosis of childhood diseases” (1890) – 9 editions, it is translated into German, Czech, Italian, Hungarian and French. In the monographs and manuals N.F. Filatov studied many of pokoleniya-pediatricians. He described the infectious disease named Filatov scarlatinal rubella. She was later described by the British physician Duxom; one of the presently used names of the disease – a disease Filatov-Dukes. In the first edition of "Lectures on infectious diseases" N.F. Filatov described is not known until the time of infectious mononucleosis, which he called idiopathic inflammation of the cervical lymphatic glands. The disease is now often called a disease Filatov. In 1895 N.F. Filatov, described an important diagnostic sign of measles is the appearance of catarrhal period of illness 1-2 days before appearance of rash spot grayish-white lesions on the mucosa of lips and cheeks. As was established later, this sign was first described by A.P. Belsky in 1890, then regardless of him F. Filatov, and in 1896 Koplik. In the literature, this symptom is known as spots Belsky-Filatova-Koplik. N.F. Filatov described the pathogenesis of some forms of edema syndrome in children, published works on prolonged afebrile forms of the flu. N.F. Filatov developed a clinical-physiological direction in Pediatrics. He created a large school of domestic pediatricians. Among his students were V.I. Molchanov and G.N. Speransky.

The classification of Microhoriini Bonadona, 1974 is revised. Five genera are recognized: Aulacoderus LaFerté-Sénectère, 1849, Falsophilus Kejval, 2015, Liparoderus LaFerté-Sénectère, 1849, Microhoria Chevrolat, 1877, and Neocrohoria Telnov, 2019. (i) New species: Microhoria almukalla Kejval, sp. nov. (Yemen), M. anahita Kejval, sp. nov. (Iran), M. antalya Kejval, sp. nov. (Turkey), M. bacillisternum Kejval, sp. nov. (Iran), M. cervi Kejval, sp. nov. (Oman), M. fergana Kejval, sp. nov. (Kyrgyzstan), M. garavuti Kejval, sp. nov. (Tajikistan), M. gibbipennis Kejval, sp. nov. (Turkey), M. halophila Kejval, sp. nov. (Turkey), M. hazara Kejval, sp. nov. (Afghanistan), M. heracleana Kejval, sp. nov. (Greece), M. impavida Kejval, sp. nov. (Turkey), M. kabulensis Kejval, sp. nov. (Afghanistan), M. kermanica Kejval, sp. nov. (Iran), M. pahlavi Kejval, sp. nov. (Iran), M. persica Kejval, sp. nov. (Iran), M. strejceki Kejval, sp. nov. (Tajikistan), M. sawda Kejval, sp. nov. (Saudi Arabia), and M. sulaimanica Kejval, sp. nov. (Pakistan, Uzbekistan). (ii) New synonymies: Microhoria Chevrolat, 1877 = Clavicomus Pic, 1894 syn. nov. = Tenuicomus Pic, 1894 syn. nov.; Microhoria depressa (LaFerté-Sénectère, 1849) = Anthicus mollis Desbrochers des Loges, 1875 syn. nov.; Microhoria edmondi (Pic, 1893) = Anthicus spinosus Pic, 1912 syn. nov.; Microhoria globipennis (Pic, 1897) = Anthicus globipennis quercicola Sahlberg, 1913 syn. nov.; Microhoria luristanica (Pic, 1911) = Anthicus pietschmi Pic, 1938 syn. nov.; Microhoria ottomana (LaFerté-Sénectère, 1849) = Anthicus merkli Pic, 1897 syn. nov.; Microhoria pinicola (Reitter, 1889) = Microhoria feroni Bonadona, 1960 syn. nov.; Microhoria posthuma (Krekich-Strassoldo, 1931) = Anthicus fumeoalatus Krekich-Strassoldo, 1931 syn. nov.; Microhoria truncatipennis (Pic, 1897) = Anthicus mouzafferi Pic, 1910 syn. nov. (iii) Status changes. Anthicus tauricus var. inobscura Pic, 1908 is raised to species level as Microhoria inobscura (Pic, 1908) stat. nov.; Anthicus truncatus var. decoloratus Pic, 1897 is removed from synonymy with Anthicus truncatus Pic, 1895 and raised to species level as Microhoria decolorata (Pic, 1897) stat. restit. (iv) New combinations: Microhoria disconotata (Pic, 1907) comb. nov., M. fossicollis (LaFerté-Sénectère, 1849) comb. nov., M. gestroi (Pic, 1895) comb. nov., M. irregularis (Pic, 1932) comb. nov., M. lividipes (Desbrochers des Loges, 1875) comb. nov., M. marginicollis (Pic, 1951) comb. nov., M. nystii (LaFerté-Sénectère, 1849) comb. nov., M. schimperi (Pic, 1898) comb. nov., M. semiviridis (Pic, 1951) comb. nov., M. strandi (Krekich-Strassoldo, 1931) comb. nov., and M. yemenita (Nardi, 2004) comb. nov., all from Anthicus Paykull, 1798. Microhoria abscondita (Telnov, 2000) comb. nov., M. adusta (Krekich-Strassoldo, 1931) comb. nov., M. afghana (Telnov, 2010) comb. nov., M. almorae (Krekich-Strassoldo, 1931) comb. nov., M. ambusta (Krekich-Strassoldo, 1931) comb. nov., M. angulifer (Pic, 1893) comb. nov., M. anomala (Telnov, 1998) comb. nov., M. antinorii (Pic, 1894) comb. nov., M. apicordiger (Bonadona, 1954) comb. nov., M. aquatilis (Krekich-Strassoldo, 1931) comb. nov., M. assamensis (Pic, 1907) comb. nov., M. assequens (Krekich-Strassoldo, 1931) comb. nov., M. atrata (Krekich-Strassoldo, 1931) comb. nov., M. austriaca (Pic, 1901) comb. nov., M. bicarinifrons (Pic, 1892) comb. nov., M. biguttata (Bonadona, 1964) comb. nov., M. brevipilis (Pic, 1893) comb. nov., M. bruckii (Kiesenwetter, 1870) comb. nov., M. brunneipes (Krekich-Strassoldo, 1931) comb. nov., M. caeruleicolor (Pic, 1906) comb. nov., M. callima (Baudi di Selve, 1877) comb. nov., M. comes (Krekich-Strassoldo, 1931) comb. nov., M. cordata (Krekich-Strassoldo, 1931) comb. nov., M. curticeps (Pic, 1923) comb. nov., M. dichrous (LaFerté-Sénectère, 1849) comb. nov., M. doderoi (Pic, 1902) comb. nov., M. erythraea (Pic, 1899) comb. nov., M. erythrodera (Marseul, 1878) comb. nov., M. feai (Pic, 1907) comb. nov., M. fugax (LaFerté-Sénectère, 1849) comb. nov., M. fugiens (Marseul, 1876) comb. nov., M. garze (Telnov, 2018) comb. nov., M. gigas (Pic, 1899) comb. nov., M. gravida (Krekich-Strassoldo, 1931) comb. nov., M. harmandi (Pic, 1899) comb. nov., M. hauseri (Pic, 1906) comb. nov., M. henoni (Pic, 1892) comb. nov., M. heydeni (Marseul, 1879) comb. nov., M. himalayana (Pic, 1909) comb. nov., M. hummeli (Pic, 1933) comb. nov., M. immaculipennis (Krekich-Strassoldo, 1931) comb. nov., M. inabsoluta (Telnov, 2003) comb. nov., M. indeprensa (Telnov, 2000) comb. nov., M. kabyliana (Pic, 1896) comb. nov., M. kejvali (Telnov, 1999) comb. nov., M. kham (Telnov, 2018) comb. nov., M. kocheri (Pic, 1951) comb. nov., M. kuluensis (Pic, 1914) comb. nov., M. lepidula (Marseul, 1876) comb. nov., M. longiceps (LaFerté-Sénectère, 1849) comb. nov., M. longicornis (Uhmann, 1983) comb. nov., M. manifesta (Pic, 1907) comb. nov., M. martinezi (Pic, 1932) comb. nov., M. muguensis (Telnov, 2000) comb. nov., M. nigrocyanella (Marseul, 1877) comb. nov., M. nigrofusca (Telnov, 2000) comb. nov., M. nigroterminata (Pic, 1909) comb. nov., M. notatipennis (Pic, 1909) comb. nov., M. olivierii (Desbrochers des Loges, 1868) comb. nov., M. optabilis LaFerté-Sénectère, 1849) comb. nov., M. paganettii (Pic, 1909) comb. nov., M. phungi (Pic, 1926) comb. nov., M. picea (LaFerté-Sénectère, 1849) comb. nov., M. plagiostola (Bonadona, 1958) comb. nov., M. plicatipennis (Pic, 1936) comb. nov., M. posthuma (Krekich-Strassoldo, 1931) comb. nov., M. postimpressa (Pic, 1938) comb. nov., M. postluteofasciata (Pic, 1938) comb. nov., M. prolatithorax (Pic, 1899) comb. nov., M. proterva (Krekich-Strassoldo, 1931) comb. nov., M. ragusae (Pic, 1898) comb. nov., M. semidepressa (Pic, 1893) comb. nov., M. separatithorax (Pic, 1914) comb. nov., M. shibatai (Nomura, 1962) comb. nov., M. schrammi Pic, 1913) comb. nov., M. sikkimensis (Pic, 1907) comb. nov., M. sinensis (Pic, 1907) comb. nov., M. spinipennis (Pic, 1898) comb. nov., M. sporadica (Krekich-Strassoldo, 1931) comb. nov., M. striaticollis (Krekich-Strassoldo, 1931) comb. nov., M. subpicea (Pic, 1914) comb. nov., M. tersa (Krekich-Strassoldo, 1931) comb. nov., M. tonkinensis (Krekich-Strassoldo, 1928) comb. nov., M. truncatella (LaFerté-Sénectère, 1849) comb. nov., M. turgida (Krekich-Strassoldo, 1928) comb. nov., M. uhagoni (Pic, 1904) comb. nov., M. uniformis (Krekich-Strassoldo, 1931) comb. nov., M. variabilis (Telnov, 2003) comb. nov., M. weigeli (Telnov, 2000) comb. nov., M. versicolor (Kiesenwetter, 1866) comb. nov., M. wuyishanensis (Nardi, 2004) comb. nov., and Nitorus niger (Uhmann, 1996) comb. nov., all from Clavicomus Pic, 1894. Microhoria agriliformis (Pic, 1893) comb. nov., M. alfierii (Pic, 1923) comb. nov., M. angelinii (Degiovanni, 2012) comb. nov., M. babaulti (Pic, 1921) comb. nov., M. barnevillei (Pic, 1892) comb. nov., M. armeniaca (Pic, 1899) comb. nov., M. bonnairii (Fairmaire, 1883) comb. nov., M. cyanipennis (Grilat, 1886) comb. nov., M. depressa (LaFerté-Sénectère, 1849) comb. nov., M. dolichocephala (Baudi di Selve, 1877) comb. nov., M. duplex (Nardi, 2004) comb. nov., M. edmondi (Pic, 1893) comb. nov., M. escalerai (Pic, 1904) comb. nov., M. finalis (Telnov, 2003) comb. nov., M. fuscomaculata (Pic, 1893) comb. nov., M. insignita (Pic, 1906) comb. nov., M. luristanica (Pic, 1911) comb. nov., M. meloiformis (Reitter, 1890) comb. nov., M. mesopotamica (Pic, 1912) comb. nov., M. ocreata (LaFerté-Sénectère, 1847) comb. nov., M. olivacea (LaFerté-Sénectère, 1849) comb. nov., M. ottomana (LaFerté-Sénectère, 1849) comb. nov., M. pallicra (Dufour, 1849) comb. nov., M. paralleliceps (Reitter, 1890) comb. nov., M. paupercula (LaFerté-Sénectère, 1847) comb. nov., M. platiai (Degiovanni, 2000) comb. nov., M. siccensis (Normand, 1950) comb. nov., M. subaerea (Reitter, 1890) comb. nov., M. subcaerulea (Pic, 1906) comb. nov., M. subsericea (Pic, 1898) comb. nov., M. tarifana (Pic, 1904) comb. nov., M. tibialis (Waltl, 1835) comb. nov., M. velox (LaFerté-Sénectère, 1849) comb. nov., M. viridipennis (Pic, 1899) comb. nov., and M. viturati (Pic, 1893) comb. nov., all from Tenuicomus Pic, 1894. Microhoria decolorata (Pic, 1897) comb. nov. and M. truncata (Pic, 1895) comb. nov. from Stricticomus Pic, 1894. Microhoria truncatipennis (Pic, 1897) comb. nov. from Anthelephila Hope, 1833. (v) Lectotype designations. Lectotypes are designated for the following species: Anthicus depressus LaFerté-Sénectère, 1849, A. edmondi Pic, 1893, A. luristanicus Pic, 1911, A. merkli Pic, 1897, A. mouzafferi Pic, 1910, A. pietschmi Pic, 1938, A. pinicola Reitter, 1889, A. posthumus Krekich-Strassoldo, 1931, and A. spinosus Pic, 1912.

Background. А history of the development of the human community is at the same time a history of the relationship between men and women, their role in society, in formation of mindset, development of science, technology and art. A woman’s path to the recognition of her merits is a struggle for equality and inclusion in all sectors of public life. Originated with particular urgency in the twentieth century, this set of problems gave impetus to the study of the female phenomenon in the sociocultural space. In this context, the disclosure of the direct contribution of talented women to art and their influence on its development has become of special relevance. The purpose of the article is to summarize segmental of information that highlights the contribution of women to the treasury of world art, their creative and inspiring power. Analytical, historical-biographical and comparative studying methods were applied to reveal the gender relationships in art and the role of woman in them as well as in the sociocultural space in general. The results from this study present a panorama of gifted women from the world of art and music who paved the way for future generations. Among them are: A. Gentileschi (1593–1653), who was the first woman admitted to The Florence Academy of Art; M. Vigee Le Brun (1755–1842), who painted portraits of the French aristocracy and later became a confidant of Marie-Antoinette; B. Morisot (1841–1895), who was accepted by the impressionists in their circle and repeatedly exhibited her works in the Paris Salon; F. Caccini (1587–1640), who went down in history as an Italian composer, teacher, harpsichordist, author of ballets and music for court theater performances; J. Kinkel (1810–1858) – the first female choral director in Germany, who published books about musical education, composed songs on poems of famous poets, as well as on her own texts; F. Mendelssohn (1805–1847) – German singer, pianist and composer, author of cantatas, vocal miniatures of organ preludes, piano pieces; R. Clark (1886–1979) – British viola player and composer who created trio, quartets, compositions for solo instruments, songs on poems of English poets; L. Boulanger (1893–1918) became the first woman to receive Grand Prix de Rome; R. Tsekhlin (1926–2007) – German harpsichordist, composer and teacher who successfully combined the composition of symphonies, concerts, choral and vocal opuses, operas, ballets, music for theatrical productions and cinema with active performing and teaching activities, and many others. The article emphasise the contribution of women-composers, writers, poetesses to the treasury of world literature and art. Among the composers in this row is S. Gubaidulina (1931), who has about 30 prizes and awards. She wrote music for 17 films and her works are being performed by famous musicians around the world. The glory of Ukrainian music is L. Dychko (1939) – the author of operas, oratorios, cantatas, symphonies, choral concertos, ballets, piano works, romances, film music. The broad famous are the French writers: S.-G. Colette (1873–1954), to which the films were devoted, the performances based on her novels are going all over the world, her lyrics are being studied in the literature departments. She was the President of the Goncourt Academy, Chevalier of the Legion of Honour, a square in the center of Paris is named after her. Also, creativity by her compatriot, L. de Vilmorin (1902–1969), on whose poems С. Arrieu, G. Auric, F. Poulenc wrote vocal miniatures, is beloved and recognized as in France as and widely abroad. The article denotes a circle of women who combined the position of a selfsufficient creator and a muse for their companion. M. Verevkina (1860–1938) – a Russian artist, a representative of expressionism in painting, not only helped shape the aesthetic views of her husband A. Yavlensky, contributing to his art education, but for a long time “left the stage” for to not compete with him and help him develop his talent fully. Furthermore, she managed to anticipate many of the discoveries as for the use of light that are associated with the names of H. Matisse, A. Derain and other French fauvist. F. Kahlo (1907–1954), a Mexican artist, was a strict critic and supporter for her husband D. Rivera, led his business, was frequently depicted in his frescoes. C. Schumann (1819–1896) was a committed promoter of R. Schumann’s creativity. She performed his music even when he was not yet recognized by public. She included his compositions in the repertoire of her students after the composer lost his ability to play due to the illness of the hands. She herself performed his works, making R. Schumann famous across Europe. In addition, Clara took care of the welfare of the family – the main source of finance was income from her concerts. The article indicates the growing interest of the twentieth century composers to the poems of female poets. Among them M. Debord-Valmore (1786–1859) – a French poetess, about whom S. Zweig, P. Verlaine and L. Aragon wrote their essays, and her poems were set to music by C. Franck, G. Bizet and R. Ahn; R. Auslender (1901–1988) is a German poetess, a native of Ukraine (Chernovtsy city), author of more than 20 collections, her lyrics were used by an American woman-composer E. Alexander to write “Three Songs” and by German composer G. Grosse-Schware who wrote four pieces for the choir; I. Bachmann (1926–1973) – the winner of three major Austrian awards, author of the libretto for the ballet “Idiot” and opera “The Prince of Hombur”. The composer H. W. Henze, in turn, created music for the play “Cicadas” by I. Bachmann. On this basis, we conclude that women not only successfully engaged in painting, wrote poems and novels, composed music, opened «locked doors», destroyed established stereotypes but were a powerful source of inspiration. Combining the roles of the creator and muse, they helped men reach the greatest heights. Toward the twentieth century, the role of the fair sex representatives in the world of art increased and strengthened significantly, which led Western European culture to a new round of its evolution.

Dugald Blair Brown, a military surgeon and Fellow of the Royal College of Surgeons, Edinburgh, published twelve papers containing 77 case studies of gunshot wounds that he had treated in the Anglo-Zulu War of 1879 and in the First Anglo-Boer War of 1880–1881. Brown devised a “conservative” method of surgery, the early development of which had been influenced by Thomas Longmore (1816–1895), Joseph Lister (1827–1912), F. J. von Esmarch (1823–1912), and Carl von Reyher (1846–1890). During these conflicts, Brown reacted to surgical practices unsuited to the battlefield and not in the interest of the wounded. One such practice was “expectant” surgery, the practitioners of which dangerously substituted natural healing for immediate wound resection. Brown also criticized “operative” surgeons who, when faced with gunshot wounds of the extremities, expeditiously amputated limbs. Viewing each case as diagnostically unique, Brown tried to salvage limbs, to preserve function, and to accelerate recovery. To achieve these objectives, he used debridement, antisepsis, drainage, nutrition, and limited post-operative intervention.

Resumen Se presenta por vez primera la biografía del ingeniero de minas Enrique Abella y Casariego, cuya vida estuvo marcada por su paso por la Inspección General de Minas de las Islas Filipinas, a la que se incorporó en 1877 y abandonó tras el desastre del 98. En las islas desarrolló una intensa investigación geológica y minera y, como jefe de la Inspección, trabajó activamente no sólo en el servicio minero, sino dando apoyo también al gobierno colonial en temas de diversa índole. Su colaboración con el general Camilo García de Polavieja, cuando este fue nombrado Gobernador y Capitán General de Filipinas en 1896, determinó también su carrera política, de marcado carácter conservador, al presentarse a diputado a Cortes en las legislaturas transcurridas entre 1899 y 1907. A su vuelta del archipiélago filipino tampoco dejó de lado su faceta de competente profesional de la minería, y fue director de dos de los más importantes establecimientos mineros del Estado, la mina de cinabrio de Almadén y la mina de plomo Arrayanes, en Linares. Abstract The biography of the mining engineer Enrique Abella y Casariego is presented for the first time, whose life path was determined by his accomplishments in the Bureau of Mines of the Philippine Islands, which he joined in 1877 and left after the loss of the colony in 1898. Abella developed an intensive geological and mining research in the Philippines and, as head of the Bureau, he worked actively not only in the mining service, but also supporting the colonial government. His collaboration with General Camilo García de Polavieja, Governor and Captain General of the Philippines in 1896, also defined his markedly conservative political career, being deputy in the legislatures between 1899 and 1907. Nevertheless, Abella did not leave aside his interests in mining at his return of the Philippines. He was appointed director of two of the main state mining establishments, the Almaden cinnabar mine and the Arrayanes lead mine in Linares. Palabras claves: Geología, Minería, Política, Filipinas, Almadén, Linares. Key words: Geology, Mining, Politics, Philippine Islands, Almaden, Linares.