Academic literature on the topic '1878-1972'

A list of available taxonomic names in Curculionidae: Scolytinae and Platypodinae in familyand genus-groups is given, together with some remarks on unavailable nominal taxa. Comments are provided on their status and nomenclature, and additions and corrections to extant catalogues given, as a first step for their inclusion in the electronic catalogue ‘WTaxa’. Available names, not recognised as such in current published catalogues, are: Mecopelminae Thompson, 1992; Trypodendrina Nunberg, 1954; Archaeoscolytus Butovitsch, 1929; Camptocerus Dejean, 1821; Coccotrypes Eichhoff, 1878 (April); Coptogaster Illiger, 1804; Cosmoderes Eichhoff, 1878 (April); Cryptoxyleborus Wood & Bright, 1992; Cylindra Illiger, 1802; Dendrochilus Schedl, 1963; Dendrocranulus Schedl, 1938; Doliopygus Browne, 1962; Doliopygus Schedl, 1972; Erioschidias Wood, 1960; Ernopocerus Wood, 1954; Idophelus Rye, 1877; Lepicerus Eichhoff, 1878 (April); Lepidocerus Rye, 1880; Miocryphalus Schedl, 1963; Ozopemon Hagedorn, 1910; Phloeoditica Schedl, 1963; Pinetoscolytus Butovitsch, 1929; Pycnarthrum Eichhoff, 1878 (April); Pygmaeoscolytus Butovitsch, 1929; Scolytogenes Eichhoff, 1878 (April); Spinuloscolytus Butovitsch, 1929; Stephanopodius Schedl, 1963; Stylotentus Schedl, 1963; Thamnophthorus Blackman, 1942; Trachyostus Browne, 1962; Treptoplatypus Schedl, 1972; Triarmocerus Eichhoff, 1878 (April); Trypodendrum Agassiz, 1846; Tubuloscolytus Butovitsch, 1929; Xelyborus Schedl, 1939. Unavailable names, not recognised as such in the current published catalogues, are: Chaetophloeini Schedl, 1966; Eidophelinae Murayama, 1954; Mecopelmini Wood, 1966; Strombophorini Schedl, 1960; Tomicidae Shuckard, 1840; Trypodendrinae Trédl, 1907; Acryphalus Tsai & Li, 1963; Adryocoetes Schedl, 1952; Asetus Nunberg, 1958; Carphoborites Schedl, 1947; Charphoborites Schedl, 1947; Cryptoxyleborus Schedl, 1937; Cylindrotomicus Eggers, 1936; Damicerus Dejean, 1835; Damicerus Dejean, 1836; Dendrochilus Schedl, 1957; Dendrocranulus Schedl, 1937; Doliopygus Schedl, 1939; Erioschidias Schedl, 1938; Ernopocerus Balachowsky, 1949; Gnathotrichoides Blackman, 1931; Ipites Karpiński, 1962; Isophthorus Schedl, 1938; Jugocryphalus Tsai & Li, 1963; Landolphianus Schedl, 1950; Mesopygus Nunberg, 1966; Micraciops Schedl, 1953; Miocryphalus Schedl, 1939; Mixopygus Nunberg, 1966; Neohyorrhynchus Schedl, 1962; Neophloeotribus Eggers, 1943; Neopityophthorus Schedl, 1938; Neoxyleborus Wood, 1982; Phloeoditica Schedl, 1962; Platypinus Schedl, 1939; Platyscapulus Schedl, 1957; Platyscapus Schedl, 1939; Pygodolius Nunberg, 1966; Scutopygus Nunberg, 1966; Stephanopodius Schedl, 1941; Stylotentus Schedl, 1939; Taphrostenoxis Schedl, 1965; Tesseroplatypus Schedl, 1935; Thamnophthorus Schedl, 1938; Thylurcos Schedl, 1939; Trachyostus Schedl, 1939; Treptoplatus Schedl, 1939. The name Tesseroceri Blandford, 1896, incorrectly given as “Tesserocerini genuini” in current catalogues, is unavailable as basionym for the family-group name, since it was proposed as a genusgroup name. Resurrected names from synonymy are: Hexacolini Eichhoff, 1878 from synonymy under Ctenophorini Chapuis, 1869 (invalid name because its type genus is a homonym) and given precedence over Problechilidae Eichhoff, 1878 under Art. 24.2; Hylurgini Gistel, 1848 from virtual synonymy under Tomicini C.G. Thomson, 1859 (unavailable name); Afromicracis Schedl, 1959 from synonymy under Miocryphalus Schedl, 1939 (an unavailable name) to valid genus; Costaroplatus Nunberg, 1963 from synonymy under Platyscapulus Schedl, 1957 (an unavailable name) to valid genus; Cumatotomicus Ferrari, 1867 from synonymy under Ips DeGeer, 1775 to valid subgenus of the same; Hapalogenius Hagedorn, 1912 from synonymy under Rhopalopselion Hagedorn, 1909 to valid genus; Pseudips Cognato, 2000, from synonymy under Orthotomicus Ferrari, 1867 to valid genus. New synonyms are: Hexacolini Eichhoff, 1878 (= Erineophilides Hopkins, 1920, syn. nov.); Hypoborini Nuesslin, 1911 (= Chaetophloeini Schedl, 1966, unavailable name, syn. nov.); Scolytini Latreille, 1804 (= Minulini Reitter, 1913, syn. nov.); Afromicracis Schedl, 1959 (= Miocryphalus Schedl, 1963, syn. nov.); Aphanarthrum Wollaston, 1854 (= Coleobothrus Enderlein, 1929, syn. nov.); Coccotrypes Eichhoff, 1878 (April) (= Coccotrypes Eichhoff, 1878 (December), syn. nov.); Cosmoderes Eichhoff, 1878 (April) (= Cosmoderes Eichhoff, 1878 (December), syn. nov.); Cumatotomicus Ferrari, 1867 (=Emarips Cognato, 2001, syn. nov.); Doliopygus Browne, 1962 (=Doliopygus Schedl, 1972, syn. nov.); Eidophelus Eichhoff, 1875 (= Idophelus Rye, 1877, syn. nov.); Hapalogenius Hagedorn, 1912 (= Hylesinopsis Eggers, 1920, syn. nov.); Phloeoborus Erichson, 1836 (= Phloeotrypes Agassiz, 1846, syn. nov.); Pycnarthrum Eichhoff, 1878 (April) (= Pycnarthrum Eichhoff, 1878 (December), syn. nov.); Scolytogenes Eichhoff, 1878 (April) (= Scolytogenes Eichhoff, 1878 (December) = Lepicerus Eichhoff, 1878 (December) = Lepidocerus Rye, 1880, synn. nov.); Trypodendron Stephens, 1830 (=Xylotrophus Gistel, 1848 = Trypodendrum Gistel, 1856, synn. nov.); Xylechinus Chapuis, 1869 (= Chilodendron Schedl, 1953, syn. nov.); Cosmoderes monilicollis Eichhoff, 1878 (April) (= Cosmoderes monilicollis Eichhoff, 1878 (December), syn. nov.); Hylastes pumilus Mannerheim, 1843 (= Dolurgus pumilus Eichhoff, 1868, syn. nov.); Hypoborus hispidus Ferrari, 1867 (= Pycnarthrum gracile Eichhoff, 1878 (April) syn. nov.); Miocryphalus agnatus Schedl, 1939 (= Miocryphalus agnatus Schedl, 1942, syn. nov.); Miocryphalus congonus Schedl, 1939 (= Miocryphalus congonus Eggers, 1940, syn. nov.); Lepicerus aspericollis Eichhoff, 1878 (April) = Lepicerus aspericollis Eichhoff, 1878 (December), syn. nov.); Spathicranuloides moikui Schedl, 1972 (June) (= Spathicranuloides moikui Schedl, 1972 (December), syn. nov.); Triarmocerus cryphalo-ides Eichhoff, 1878 (April) (= Triarmocerus cryphaloides Eichhoff, 1878 (December), syn. nov.); Scolytogenes darvini Eichhoff, 1878 (April) (= Scolytogenes darwinii Eichhoff, 1878 (December), syn. nov.). New type species designations are: Bostrichus dactyliperda Fabricius, 1801 for Coccotrypes Eichhoff, 1878 (April); Triarmocerus cryphaloides Eichhoff, 1878 (April) for Triarmocerus Eichhoff, 1878 (April); Ozopemon regius Hagedorn, 1908 for Ozopemon Hagedorn, 1910 (non 1908); Dermestes typographus Linnaeus, 1758 for Bostrichus Fabricius, 1775 (non Geoffroy, 1762). New combinations are: Afromicracis agnata (Schedl, 1939), A. attenuata (Eggers, 1935), A. ciliatipennis (Schedl, 1979), A. congona (Schedl, 1939), A. dubia (Schedl, 1950), A. elongata (Schedl, 1965), A. grobleri (Schedl, 1961), A. klainedoxae (Schedl, 1957), A. longa (Nunberg, 1964), A. natalensis (Eggers, 1936), A. nigrina (Schedl, 1957), A. nitida (Schedl, 1965), A. pennata (Schedl, 1953) and A. punctipennis (Schedl, 1965) all from Miocryphalus; Costaroplatus abditulus (Wood, 1966), C. abditus (Schedl, 1936), C. carinulatus (Chapuis, 1865), C. clunalis (Wood, 1966), C. cluniculus (Wood, 1966), C. clunis (Wood, 1966), C. costellatus (Schedl, 1933), C. frontalis (Blandford, 1896), C. imitatrix (Schedl, 1972), C. manus (Schedl, 1936), C. occipitis (Wood, 1966), C. pulchellus (Chapuis, 1865), C. pulcher (Chapuis, 1865), C. pusillimus (Chapuis, 1865), C. subabditus (Schedl, 1935), C. turgifrons (Schedl, 1935) and C. umbrosus (Schedl, 1936) all from Platyscapulus; Hapalogenius africanus (Eggers, 1933), H. alluaudi (Lepesme, 1942), H. angolanus (Wood, 1988), H. angolensis (Schedl, 1959), H. arabiae (Schedl, 1975), H. atakorae (Schedl, 1951), H. ater (Nunberg, 1967), H. baphiae (Schedl, 1954), H. brincki (Schedl, 1957), H. confusus (Eggers, 1935), H. decellei (Nunberg, 1969), H. dimorphus (Schedl, 1937), H. dubius (Eggers, 1920), H. emarginatus (Nunberg, 1973), H. endroedyi (Schedl, 1967), H. fasciatus (Hagedorn, 1909), H. ficus (Schedl, 1954), H. fuscipennis (Chapuis, 1869), H. granulatus (Lepesme, 1942), H. hirsutus (Schedl, 1957), H. hispidus (Eggers, 1924), H. horridus (Eggers, 1924), H. joveri (Schedl, 1950), H. kenyae (Wood, 1986), H. oblongus (Eggers, 1935), H. orientalis (Eggers, 1943), H. pauliani (Lepesme, 1942), H. punctatus (Eggers, 1932), H. quadrituberculatus (Schedl, 1957), H. rhodesianus (Eggers, 1933), H. saudiarabiae (Schedl, 1971), H. seriatus (Eggers, 1940), H. squamosus (Eggers, 1936), H. striatus (Schedl, 1957), H. sulcatus Eggers, 1944), H. togonus (Eggers, 1919), H. ugandae (Wood, 1986) and H. variegatus (Eggers, 1936), all from Hylesinopsis. New ranks are: Diapodina Strohmeyer, 1914, downgraded from tribe of Tesserocerinae to subtribe of Tesserocerini; Tesserocerina Strohmeyer, 1914, downgraded from tribe of Tesserocerinae to subtribe of Tesserocerini. New placements are: Coptonotini Chapuis, 1869 from tribe of Coptonotinae to tribe of Scolytinae; Mecopelmini Thompson, 1992, from tribe of Coptonotinae to tribe of Platypodinae; Schedlariini Wood & Bright, 1992, from tribe of Coptonotinae to tribe of Platypodinae; Spathicranuloides Schedl, 1972, from Platypodinae s.l. to Tesserocerina; Toxophthorus Wood, 1962 from Scolytinae incertae sedis to Dryocoetini. Confirmed placements are: Onychiini Chapuis, 1869 to tribe of Cossoninae (including single genus Onychius Chapuis, 1869); Sciatrophus Sampson, 1914 in Cossoninae incertae sedis; Cryphalites Cockerell, 1917 in Zopheridae Colydiinae. Corrected spellings are: Micracidini LeConte, 1876 for Micracini; Phrixosomatini Wood, 1978 for Phrixosomini. Gender agreements are corrected for species of several genera.

Metaltella simoni (Keyserling, 1878), an amaurobiid spider species precinctive to Argentina and Uruguay, and probably southern Brazil, is well established in the southeastern coastal regions of the United States (Leech 1972: 107). It was brought to North America by commercial and trade activities, hence the apparent distribution disjunction. The first Nearctic record is 23–30 July 1944, from Harahan, Louisiana (Leech 1972: 107).

Статья профессора С. В. Троицкого (1878 - 1972) является откликом на состоявшийся в Москве 21- 23 ноября 1944 года Собор епископов Русской Церкви. Собор состоял из 50 архиереев и прошел под председательством Патриаршего Местоблюстителя митрополита Алексия (Симанского) с целью выработать регламент проведения Поместного Собора, необходимого для избрания нового Предстоятели Русской Православной Церкви после кончины 15 мая 1944 года Святейшего Патриарха Сергия (Страгородского). На этом же Собор рассматривался проект «Положения об управлении Русской православной Церковью», подготовленный архиепископом Псковским и Порховским Григорием (Чуковым) и впоследствии принятый Поместным Собором 1945 года. The article by Professor S. V. Troitsky (1878-1972) is a response to the Council of Bishops of the Russian Church held in Moscow on November 21-23, 1944. The Council consisted of 50 bishops and was chaired by the Patriarchal Locum Tenens Metropolitan Alexy (Simansky) in order to develop the regulations for the Local Council, necessary for the election of the new Primate of the Russian Orthodox Church after the death of His Holiness Patriarch Sergius (Stragorodsky) on May 15, 1944. At the same Council, the draft "Regulations on the Management of the Russian Orthodox Church" prepared by Archbishop Grigory (Chukov) of Pskov and Porkhovsky and subsequently adopted by the Local Council of 1945 were considered.

Professor Kemp1 has revisited the circumstances in which the Princess Alice crossed ahead of, and was run down by, the oncoming Bywell Castle in 1878. This note focuses on the seamanship of the manoeuvre made by the Bywell Castle in the agony of the moment before collision. This manoeuvre was judged to be wrong at the time. The note concludes by considering how this manoeuvre would be judged today in the light of the seamanship required by Rule 17 of Colregs 1972 and draws attention to proposals made by Captain Phillip Colomb to the Thames Traffic Committee in 1879.

Dossier: Grandes psiquiatras argentinas: Arturo AMEGHINO (1869-1948), René ARDITI ROCHA (1904-1962), Gregorio BERMANN (1894-1972), José T. BORDA (1869-1936), Gonzalo BOSCH (1885-1965), Exequías BRINGAS NÚÑEZ (1904-2000),Domingo CABRED (1859-1929), Raúl CAMINO (1939-2018), Lanfranco CIAMPI (1885-1962), Juan DALMA (1895-1977), Francisco DE VEYGA (1866-1942), Noel FELDMAN (1928-2001), R. Horacio ETCHEGOYEN (1919-2016), Jorge GARCÍA BADARACCO (1924-2010), Mauricio GOLDENBERG (1916-2006), José INGENIEROS (1877-1925), Cristofredo JAKOB (1856-1966), Alejandro KORN (1860 -1936), Enrique Eduardo KRAPF (1901-1963), Osvaldo LOUDET (1889-1983), Lucio MELÉNDEZ (1844-1901), Braulio MOYANO (1906-1959), Juan M. OBARRIO (1878-1958), Elpidio R. OLIVERA (1924-2016), Carlos Rodolfo PEREYRA (1903-1965), Enrique PICHON RIVIÈRE (1907-1977), José María RAMOS MEJÍA (1852-1914), Telma RECA (1904-1979), Carolina TOBAR GARCIA (1898-1962), Guillermo VIDAL (1917-2000).

The taxonomical status of the species in the genus Stellaria Møller, 1832 is reviewed. Prior to this work, the genus included several recent and fossil species, showing considerable morphological variation. This genus is reviewed and Trochus solaris Linné, 1764 and Stellaria solaris paucispinosa Kosuge & Nomoto, 1972 are retained in it. The latter taxon is here elevated to species level.Trochus chinensis Philippi, 1841, Trochus infundibulum Brocchi, 1814, Tugurium makiyamai Itoigawa & Nishikawa, 1976, Tugurium subextensum var. ornatoparva Sacco, 1896, Xenophora dunkeri Martin, 1879, Xenophora gigantea Schepman, 1909, Xenophora lamberti Souverbie, 1871, [Xenophora] (Tugurium) plioitalicum Sacco, 1896, Xenophora (Trochotugurium) subagglutinans Glibert, 1938 and Stellaria striatissima Raven, 2021 are assigned to Aspidophoreas gen. nov. Xenophora digitata von Martens, 1878 and Xenophora (Stellaria) testigera profunda Ponder, 1983 are elevated to species level, and together with the fossil species Phorus testigerus Bronn, 1831, Xenophora cleopatrae Cuvillier, 1933, Xenophora conica Dall, 1892 and Stellaria kriegerbartholdi Nielsen & DeVries, 2002, they are assigned to Ponderiana gen. nov. The main morphological characters of the new genera are described.

De Zeehond or Fiducie? New insights into the identity and date of foundering of Flevoland’s best known sailing barge shipwreck. This paper focuses on the late 19th-century wreck of a Groninger tjalk (sailing barge) that was discovered in the 1960s in the eastern part of Flevoland, near the city of Lelystad. During the excavation of the wreck (1972), two wooden battens were found that carried the inscriptions ’18 DE ZEEHOND 78’ and ‘W Venema 1878 A Koerts’. Soon it was concluded that the former carried the name and date of the ship and its construction, while the latter carried the names of the ship’s owners. Additional research revealed that the operators were identified as Willem Venema and Annegien Koerts from Hoogezand, Groningen. However, the archives failed to provide any information on a ship known as De Zeehond, whereas historical documents proved that Willem Venema did own a ship by the name of Fiducie. The current study answers the question whether the ship’s true name was De Zeehond or Fiducie, and provides new and more detailed insights into the ship’s career, date of foundering and crew history.

Catasticta lycurgus is a striking endemic butterfly, restricted to high elevation habitats in the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta, an isolated mountain range separate from the Andes in the north of Colombia. The type, which for almost a hundred years was the only known specimen, was collected in 1878 by Frederick Simons in the vicinity of Atánquez and was sent to the UK to be described by renowned naturalists Godman and Salvin in 1880. In 1972, explorers Adams and Bernard collected a second specimen of C. lycurgus in the locality of San Pedro at 2,900m of elevation in the Sierra Nevada de Santa Marta. These two specimens were the only known ones for many decades until recently, when Colombian entomologists found the species again in San Pedro de la Sierra and later, when a female was discovered in 2013. Here, we report the rediscovery of this rare and charismatic species, with new specimens collected near the type locality, which have not been reported previously. The female of C. lycurgus is described and illustrated for the first time as well the male genitalia of this species. We combine all information available to provide some insights on the systematic relationships of this species within the genus Catasticta Butler, discuss its distribution and provide a preliminary conservation assessment. Despite the newly collected specimens, the species remains very rare in the field and in collections.

In this thesis I argue that the received understanding of the work of the Women’s Missionary Association of the Presbyterian Church of England is flawed in that it does not acknowledge the agency of women themselves in creating and directing the path of the Association and its work of mission. Using archive material from the Presbyterian Church of England, and the Women’s Missionary Association itself, I show that as the context in which they were operating changed, the Women’s Missionary Association responded to that shifting context, and that changes in their relationship to the national Church affected the work that they sought to do among the congregations. I uncover a hitherto hidden story and to relate it to the context of the United Reformed Church which stands in the tradition of Presbyterians, Congregationalists and Churches of Christ. I demonstrate how the Story of the Women’s Missionary Association interacts with changing paradigms of mission. Further, I discuss the role of power relationships between the Women’s Missionary Association and the Presbyterian Church of England and the changing role and powerfulness/powerlessness of women in the Presbyterian Church and its successor the United Reformed Church. I show how seeming powerlessness can confer power and how being invited to the seat of power can restrict agency for the women of the Church. Finally, I look at the implications for the contemporary United Reformed Church.

Nous présentons dans notre thèse la pensée, les œuvres et la personnalité du théologien orthodoxe russe émérite S.V. Troickij, dont la longue vie s’est éteinte à l’âge de 94 ans (1878 - 1972). Le Professeur Sergej Viktorovič Troickij (1878-1972) était un vrai savant, ayant des connaissances approfondies dans plusieurs domaines. Il était expert à la fois en Droit canon (Tradition canonique), en archéologie, en histoire et, en particulier, en théologie chrétienne. Auteur de plusieurs centaines d’œuvres, dont une grande partie est consacrée aux questions canoniques, ce qui lui valut une autorité incontestable dans le monde orthodoxe. Ses écrits sont édités en Russie, en Serbie et en France à Paris. Dans le cadre du doctorat en mention : Histoire, textes et documents, nous proposons une présentation et une traduction des travaux de S.V.Troickij, avec l’analyse de sa pensée, ainsi que la présentation de ses archives personnelles que nous avons trouvées et exploitées lors de nos recherches en Russie (à la Laure de la Trinité-Saint-Serge), en Serbie (à Belgrade et à Sremcki-Karlovci) et en France (à l’Institut de Théologie Orthodoxe de Paris) de 2009 à 2015
This paper features the ideas, works and life of the famous Orthodox theologian S.V. Troitsky, who lived a long life of 94 years (1878-1972). S.V. Troitsky was a great scientist, with extensive knowledge in different areas. He was considered an expert in canon law, a specialist in archeology, history, and was a brilliant theologian. Author of several books and hundreds of articles, S.V. Troitsky was respected in academic circles and in the Orthodox world. His works were published in Russia, Serbia, and in Paris, France. As part of the research presented in this doctoral thesis in the field of history, texts and documents, we present a translation and overview of S.V. Troitsky’s works, the analysis of his ideas and personal archives, which we were able to find and process in Russia (St.Trinity-Sergius Lavra), Serbia (Belgrade and Sremski Karlovci) and France (St. Sergius Orthodox Theological Institute in Paris) from 2009 to 2015

L'architecture officielle nationale-socialiste adopte dès 1934, par sa monumentalité, une allure qui la distingue en tant que telle de tout ce qui s'est fait auparavant. L'analyse des caractéristiques et des sources de cette architecture est le thème principal de cette thèse. P. L. Troost dessine les premiers édifices du Parti à Munich; Ernst Sagebiel est l'architecte de l'aéroport de Tempelhof et du ministère de Göring à Berlin; Hans Reissinger imagine à Bayreuth un édifice à l'enveloppe composite pour l'association des enseignants du Reich; Ludwig et F. Ruff dessinent un hall gigantesque destiné aux congrès du parti à Nuremberg. Leurs œuvres présentent des formes de monumentalité très éloignées de la seule référence à un néoclassicisme simplifié. Leurs édifices, marqués par une grande exigence de représentation, répondent néanmoins, avec beaucoup d'efficacité pour certains d'entre eux, à la fonction à laquelle ils sont destinés. L'étude de ces édifices s'attache à observer l'évolution des esquisses et des maquettes dans le sens d'une monumentalité toujours plus grande, l'effet recherché l'emportant sur toute autre considération. Une iconographie sculptée à la gloire Reich et du Parti, en ses emblèmes et ses bas-reliefs, complète cette mise en scène. La notion de tectonique germanique privilégiée par les historiens de ce régime pour exprimer l'essence de l'architecture dans sa recherche de formes originelles est soigneusement examinée. Les racines dont elle se prévaut font appel à une Allemagne mythique entièrement recréée et berceau de l'univers. L'examen des édifices retenus est donc tout d'abord une analyse architecturale, complétée par la prise en compte de l'important appareil éditorial qui en a assuré la présentation officielle pendant le Reich. En contrepoint, il a été tenu compte des nombreuses publications que cette architecture a suscitées en Allemagne depuis les années 1970
As early as 1934, the official National-Socialist architecture takes a stand which sets it apart from ail things past, bringing out the very peculiar monumentality of the period. Analyzing the characteristics and the sources of this state architecture during the early years of the Third Reich, constitutes the main theme of the present thesis. P.L. Troost, who designed the first buildings of the Party in Munich, Ernst Sagebiel, author of the Tempelhof Airport and Göring's Ministry in Berlin, Hans Reissinger who designed a building with a composite envelop meant for the Reich teachers' Association in Bayreuth, and finally Ludwig and F. Ruff who designed a gigantic hall to accommodate the Party's conventions in Nuremberg, are the architects who se works are being reviewed. Their buildings present monumental forms which are quite remote from simplistic neo-classical references. These works are marked by great representational demands and yet, in some cases, they also respond to functionality in a highly efficient way. This study of the chosen buildings attempts to observe, from the moment of conception through the evolution of sketches and models, an ever-increasing monumentality: the establishment of a mode of composition favoring organizing symmetries of plans and elevations and the final embellishment of the facades with added-on elements, the reached-for effect being always more important than any other consideration. A sculptured iconography glorifying the regime and the Reich, with its signs, symbols and freezes, completes this setting. The concept of a German tectonic, so privileged by historians of the regime, expressing the essence of this official architecture in its search for original forms, is therefore examined in detail, revealing the roots it refers to: at its center is a newly-recreated mythical Germany as cradle of the universe. The analysis of the chosen buildings is thus first architectural, then completed by examining the editorial apparatus which has ensured its official presentation during the Third Reich. On the other hand, the numerous publications spurred by this architecture in Germany since the 1970's, have also been taken into account

Dans le contexte culturel moderne de l'entre-deux-guerres, le roman d'aventure(s) apparaît comme un mouvement littéraire novateur, se démarquant à la fois de l'esthétique de la fin du XIXe siècle, tournée vers la décadence et l'académisme, et de la vocation déconstructiviste des avant-gardes. Dynamisée par le concept d'aventure, envisagée comme un prisme thématique, poétique et spéculatif, la nouvelle esthétique romanesque se situe sous l'influence croisée du roman néo-réaliste et du roman poétique. Lancé par J. Rivière (1913), le débat sur le roman d'aventure(s) est repris dans une perspective "poétique" par la critique belge [Le Disque Vert, Sélection, Nord (1921-1929]. Il se prolonge par une réflexion de la revue italienne 900, qui fait interférer l'"aventure novécentiste" et le "réalisme magique" (1926-1929) et nourrit aussi quelques prises de positions littéraires en Russie, chez les Frères Sérapion (1921-1922) ainsi que certaines des professions de foi de l'écrivain roumain Panaït Istrati (1924-1934). Une série de romans, publiés dans les années 1920 par Franz Hellens, Massimo Bontempelli, Vsévolod Ivanov et Panaït Istrati, illustrent l'hybridation des poétiques du roman d'aventures canonique et de "l'esprit nouveau". Le hasard qui entretient la surprise et canalise la découverte de l'inconnu, rejoint le mystère et l'étrange, le tout coulé dans le moule du vraisemblabe et de l'illusoire. Mélusine, La Vita Intensa, Les Merveilleuses aventures du tailleur Fokine, Les Chardons de Baragan sont quelques oeuvres représentatives d'un corpus européen plus ample, qui propose un parcours romanesque allant du portrait de l'artiste en aventurier à l'écriture "en état d'aventure". Mettant en scène des personnages du naïf, du fou, du mannequin et de l'anti-aventurier aux exploits dérisoires, ces romans se fondent sur un traitement subversif, essentiellement parodique des topoï d'une aventure intertextuelle à multiples référents. Des aventures merveilleuses, extraordinaires, picaresques, policières, coloniales qui interfèrent avec une méta-aventure moderne, qui met l'accent sur le processus artistique et ses protagonistes. Lorsqu'il s'érige en créateur, le héros moderne rejoint un avatar moins conventionnel du démiurge, le marionnettiste, tout à manipuler maladroitement les fils de sa création

2.1 L’impresa famigliare e longeva. – 2.1.1 Il Significato dell’impresa famigliare. – 2.1.2. Il Significato dell’Impresa Longeva. – 2.2 Il caso aziendale Barovier&Toso. – 2.2.2. Antonio Salviati (1866-1878): valorizzare la tradizione artigianale (e mercantile) di un territorio. – 2.2.3 Giovanni Barovier & nipoti (1878-1919): valorizzare la tradizione artigianale di una famiglia (e di un territorio), innovando i prodotti. – 2.2.4 Ercole Barovier (1919-1936): dall’artigiano artista all’imprenditore designer per perseguire la strategia delle ‘2e’ (esperienza estetica & efficienza). – 2.2.5 Ercole e Angelo Barovier (1936-1972): dalla strategia delle ‘2e’, a quella delle ‘2b’ (big & better) per rispondere alle discontinuità ambientali. – 2.2.6 Angelo e Jacopo Barovier (1972-1990): valorizzare la tradizione artigianale di un’impresa famigliare, innovando il modello di business. – 2.2.7 Jacopo Barovier (1990-2013): dall’imprenditore manager, al manager imprenditore per perseguire la strategia delle ‘2f’ (focalizzazione e funzione). – 2.2.8 Visione, Missione, Strategia, Paradossi Strategici, Modello di Business di Barovier&Toso.