To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: Academic publication.
Journal articles on the topic 'Academic publication'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'Academic publication.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.
1
Schneijderberg, Christian, Nicolai Götze, and Lars Müller. "A study of 25 years of publication outputs in the German academic profession." Scientometrics 127, no. 1 (January 2022): 1–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s11192-021-04216-2.
Full textAbstract:
AbstractIn the weak evaluation state of Germany, full professors are involved in the traditional social governance partnership between the state, and the self-governing higher education institutions (HEI) and disciplinary associations. Literature suggests that formal and informal governance could trigger changes in academics’ publication behavior by valorizing certain publication outputs. In the article, secondary data from three surveys (1992, 2007 and 2018) is used for a multi-level study of the evolution of academics’ publication behavior. We find a trend toward the “model” of natural science publication behavior across all disciplines. On the organizational level, we observe that a strong HEI research performance orientation is positively correlated with journal articles, peer-reviewed publications, and co-publications with international co-authors. HEI performance-based funding is only positively correlated with the share of peer-reviewed publications. At the level of individual disciplines, humanities and social sciences scholars adapt to the peer-reviewed journal publication paradigm of the natural sciences at the expense of book publications. Considering how the academic profession is organized around reputation and status, it seems plausible that the academic profession and its institutional oligarchy are key contexts for the slow but steady change of academics’ publication behavior. The trend of changing academics’ publication behavior is partly related to HEI valorization of performance and (to a lesser extent) to HEI performance based-funding schemes, which are set by the strong academic profession in the weak evaluation state of Germany.
2
Inzelt, A., and A. Schubert. "Collaboration between researchers from academic and non-academic organisations." Acta Oeconomica 61, no. 4 (December 1, 2011): 441–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.1556/aoecon.61.2011.4.3.
Full textAbstract:
Throughout the reform process of the European university system, the importance of collaboration between actors at the academy and other areas of the economy and society are ever increasing, as evidenced by a growing number of co-authored articles and the number of citations to such works.This article analyses the characteristics of publications co-authored by Hungarian university researchers with non-academic partners. Scientometric indicators are used as primary methodological tools. Our sample was the publication output of 12 universities, which covers 90% of the university sphere’s publications, between 2001 and 2005 and was taken from the publications of Hungarian institutions of higher education appearing in the Web of Science database. The authors employed a new, important aspect in the cooperation activity of Hungarian universities: their connection with the non-academic partners. The selection and the institutional location of the co-authors resulted in an important database for further analysis. Based on the empirical analysis of the publication and citation performance data of 12 such universities the authors concluded that the proportion of citations to publications co-authored with either academic or non-academic partners is significantly higher for international partners than it is for Hungarian ones. For one publication, the proportion of citations to articles co-authored with foreign non-academic partners, such as firms or health care institutions, was five times higher than the number relating to papers co-authored with Hungarian firms or health care institutions. Higher citedness of the joint articles with the foreign country institutes than domestic partners are in harmony with observation in other countries. Generally the rate of the co-authored articles with non-academic partners is rather low. However it scatters to a great extent concerning the different universities. The presence or absence of medicine in the profile of the universities seems an important factor of that difference.
3
Serpa, Sandro, Maria José Sá, Ana Isabel Santos, and Carlos Miguel Ferreira. "Challenges for the Academic Editor in the Scientific Publication." Academic Journal of Interdisciplinary Studies 9, no. 3 (May 10, 2020): 12. http://dx.doi.org/10.36941/ajis-2020-0037.
Full textAbstract:
The academic editor has been, and still is, the gatekeeper of peer-reviewed scientific publications, by being whom, ultimately, defines whether or not a manuscript can be published. At a time of profound transformation in the context of scientific publication (digital publishing, open access, preprint, open peer review,...) and the expectations, inside and outside academia, towards academic publication, this perspective paper aims to add to the discussion of the (re)formulation of the academic editor’s role, considering that he or she, in this panoply of changes, continues, and will continue to be, the ultimate guardian of the scientific quality of what is published.
4
Grech, Carol, and David Evans. "Promoting Academic Publication." Nurse Author & Editor 22, no. 2 (June 2012): 1–6. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1750-4910.2012.tb00126.x.
Full text
5
Lutter, Mark, and Martin Schröder. "Is There a Motherhood Penalty in Academia? The Gendered Effect of Children on Academic Publications in German Sociology." European Sociological Review 36, no. 3 (November 27, 2019): 442–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/esr/jcz063.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract Based on data that tracks curriculum vitae (CV) and publication records as well as survey information from sociologists in German academia, we examine the effects of parenthood on the publication output of male and female academics that were present in German universities or research institutes in the year 2013. Results indicate that having children leads to a significant decline in the number of publications by women on average, while not affecting the number of publications by men. However, the gendered effect of children on productivity hardly mitigates differences in publication output between men and women, as women still publish about 20 per cent less than men after controlling for the adverse effects of children on productivity. The gendered effect of childbearing depends partly on prior levels of women’s academic achievements, suggesting a mechanism of performance-driven self-selection. Lower-performing women tend to suffer a stronger motherhood penalty than better performing women, while the publication output of successful women (who have been granted academic awards) is not reduced through childbirth. The results indicate that women are better at managing the ‘double burden’ of kids and career if external, award-giving committees have bestowed prestige upon them or indicated their potential for a scientific career.
6
Ansor, Shokibul. "Study Meta Analysis of Strategies and Utilization of Electronic Journals ( e - journals ) For Graduate Student University of Malang in Efforts Produce Internationally Reputed Scientific Publications." Record and Library Journal 3, no. 1 (January 9, 2018): 63. http://dx.doi.org/10.20473/rlj.v3-i1.2017.63-73.
Full textAbstract:
Scientific publications in journals of international repute acts as a medium for self-actualization academics in the development of science internationally . Higher education institutions that have the quality of education , science and technology are good tend to have a high number of international publications . To produce scientific publications of high quality , must be supported by research and a source of reference quality . In an effort to improve the scientific publication of national repute academic environment . Malang State University. providing electronic information resources in the form of an electronic journal that comes from a variety of electronic information resources , in the hope utilized by students in an effort to increase scientific publication of international repute . The effort is also supported by a set of rules that requires that academic graduate students have a scientific publication of international repute as a graduation requirement
7
Komala Putri, Ratna, Ernie Tisnawati Sule, Nury Effendi, and Hilmiana . "The Academic Climate and Organizational Support Influence on Performance of Lecturers Scientific Publications (Study at the Private University Accredited in West Java)." International Journal of Engineering & Technology 7, no. 3.30 (August 24, 2018): 567. http://dx.doi.org/10.14419/ijet.v7i3.30.18432.
Full textAbstract:
Objective - This article aims to produce a study of: Academic climate, organizational support and the performance of scientific publications of lecturers. Then examine the influence of academic climate and organizational support on the performance of lecturer scientific publications. Research on the performance of scientific publications is still very rare, let alone linking the issue to the academic climate and organizational support. So that research on this scientific publication should be done immediately so that scientific publications of lecturers in Indonesia can increase, especially the performance of scientific publications of lecturers at the private university in West Java.Method - The research design used in this research is mixed method Research (MMR). The analytical tool uses a Partial Lease Square.Findings - Scientific publications of lecturers will increase both in quantity and quality if conducive academic climate and organizational support activities. Academic climate and organizational support affect the performance of lecturer scientific publications, either partially or simultaneously. Simultaneously influence the academic climate and organizational support to Performance of Scientific Publication of Lecturers, amounted to 54,4%. While partially Academic climate and Organizational Support influential significantly to Performance of Scientific Publication of Lecturers, which is Academic climate has a greater influence (34,8%).
8
Suart, Celeste, Kaitlyn Neuman, and Ray Truant. "The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on perceived publication pressure among academic researchers in Canada." PLOS ONE 17, no. 6 (June 22, 2022): e0269743. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0269743.
Full textAbstract:
The phenomenon of “publish-or-perish” in academia, spurred on by limited funding and academic positions, has led to increased competition and pressure on academics to publish. Publication pressure has been linked with multiple negative outcomes, including increased academic misconduct and researcher burnout. COVID-19 has disrupted research worldwide, leading to lost research time and increased anxiety amongst researchers. The objective of this study was to examine how COVID-19 has impacted perceived publication pressure amongst academic researchers in Canada. We used the revised Publication Pressure Questionnaire, in addition to Likert-type questions to discern respondents’ beliefs and concerns about the impact of COVID-19 on academic publishing. We found that publication pressure increased across academic researchers in Canada following the pandemic, with respondents reporting increased stress, increased pessimism, and decreased access to support related to publishing. Doctoral students reported the highest levels of stress and pessimism, while principal investigators had the most access to publication support. There were no significant differences in publication pressure reported between different research disciplines. Women and non-binary or genderfluid respondents reported higher stress and pessimism than men. We also identified differences in perceived publication pressure based on respondents’ publication frequency and other demographic factors, including disability and citizenship status. Overall, we document a snapshot of perceived publication pressure in Canada across researchers of different academic career stages and disciplines. This information can be used to guide the creation of researcher supports, as well as identify groups of researchers who may benefit from targeted resources.
9
Tregellas, Jason R., Jason Smucny, Donald C. Rojas, and Kristina T. Legget. "Predicting academic career outcomes by predoctoral publication record." PeerJ 6 (October 4, 2018): e5707. http://dx.doi.org/10.7717/peerj.5707.
Full textAbstract:
Background For students entering a science PhD program, a tenure-track faculty research position is often perceived as the ideal long-term goal. A relatively small percentage of individuals ultimately achieve this goal, however, with the vast majority of PhD recipients ultimately finding employment in industry or government positions. Given the disparity between academic career ambitions and outcomes, it is useful to understand factors that may predict those outcomes. Toward this goal, the current study examined employment status of PhD graduates from biomedical sciences programs at the University of Colorado Anschutz Medical Campus (CU AMC) and related this to metrics of predoctoral publication records, as well as to other potentially important factors, such as sex and time-since-degree, to determine if these measures could predict career outcomes. Methods Demographic information (name, PhD program, graduation date, sex) of CU AMC biomedical sciences PhD graduates between 2000 and 2015 was obtained from University records. Career outcomes (academic faculty vs. non-faculty) and predoctoral publication records (number and impact factors of first-author and non-first-author publications) were obtained via publicly available information. Relationships between predoctoral publication record and career outcomes were investigated by (a) comparing faculty vs. non-faculty publication metrics, using t-tests, and (b) investigating the ability of predoctoral publication record, sex, and time-since-degree to predict career outcomes, using logistic regression. Results Significant faculty vs. non-faculty differences were observed in months since graduation (p < 0.001), first-author publication number (p = 0.001), average first-author impact factor (p = 0.006), and highest first-author impact factor (p = 0.004). With sex and months since graduation as predictors of career outcome, the logistic regression model was significant (p < 0.001), with both being male and having more months since graduation predicting career status. First-author related publication metrics (number of publications, average impact factor, highest impact factor) all significantly improved model fit (χ2 < 0.05 for all) and were all significant predictors of faculty status (p < 0.05 for all). Non-first-author publication metrics did not significantly improve model fit or predict faculty status. Discussion Results suggest that while sex and months since graduation also predict career outcomes, a strong predoctoral first-author publication record may increase likelihood of obtaining an academic faculty research position. Compared to non-faculty, individuals employed in faculty positions produced more predoctoral first-author publications, with these being in journals with higher impact factors. Furthermore, first-author publication record, sex, and months since graduation were significant predictors of faculty status.
10
Pereira, Gustavo Bernardi, Adriana de Paula Lacerda Santos, and Marcelo Gechele Cleto. "INDUSTRY 4.0: glitter or gold? A systematic review." Brazilian Journal of Operations & Production Management 15, no. 2 (June 1, 2018): 247–53. http://dx.doi.org/10.14488/bjopm.2018.v15.n2.a7.
Full textAbstract:
Publications on the fourth industrial revolution have skyrocketed since its establishment in 2011, both in academic and non-academic channels. Even though their measurable results have been published in non-academic material, especially among industry and business reports, within the academia it is still unclear how they are shown. This study aims to review and analyse the presence of industrial results within the academic context in a systematic manner by using the Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic reviews and Meta-Analyses (PRISMA) methodology. The findings indicate an increase trend of this type of publication within the academia and further directions are suggested.
11
Rowan, Andrew N., and M. K. Rowan. "Writing for Academic Publication." Anthrozoös 8, no. 1 (March 1995): 4–8. http://dx.doi.org/10.2752/089279395787156491.
Full text
12
Byard, Roger W. "Academic standing and publication." Forensic Science, Medicine and Pathology 18, no. 1 (January 3, 2022): 1–3. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12024-021-00449-y.
Full text
13
McCleary, Ken W. "Ethics in Academic Publication." Hospitality Research Journal 18, no. 1 (August 1994): 139–48. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/109634809401800110.
Full text
14
Joob, B., and V. Wiwanitkit. "Plagiarism in academic publication." Archivos de la Sociedad Española de Oftalmología (English Edition) 94, no. 2 (February 2019): e9. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.oftale.2018.10.010.
Full text
15
Grant, Maria J., Robyn R. Lotto, and Ian D. Jones. "What we can learn from elite academic staff publication portfolios: a social network analysis." Aslib Journal of Information Management 72, no. 4 (July 9, 2020): 605–24. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/ajim-10-2019-0300.
Full textAbstract:
PurposeThe study aims to construct an understanding of professional academic writing network structures to inform organisational strategic investment in academic staff development.Design/methodology/approachLongitudinal social network analysis is used to examine the personal-networks evident in the publication portfolios of a purposive sample of four international academics across each quartile of the SCOPUS defined area of General Nursing's top 100 authors.FindingsTrends in the publication portfolios of elite academics across gender, sector and geographic location are presented. In the first years of successful writing for publication, authors collaborate within a single highly connected co-author network. This network will typically expand to include new co-authors, before additional separate co-author collaborations emerge (three- to four- years). Authors experience steady growth in co-author numbers four- to seven- years from first co-authored publication. After a period of rapid expansion, these collaborations coalesce into a smaller number of highly connected groups (eight- to ten- years). Most collaborations occur within the higher education sector and across multiple disciplines including medicine, social sciences and psychology. Male co-authors are disproportionately represented in what is a predominantly female profession.Practical implicationsThe development of extended co-author networks, locally, internationally and across the higher education sector, enable authors to attain the marker of achievement required by universities and government funding bodies, namely sustained output of academic publications. Identified trends support the inclusion of investment in academic time and resources in higher education institutions strategic and operational plans to enable academic staff to develop interdisciplinary professional networks. In focussing this investment on gender equality, female academics will experience parity of opportunity in achieving their organisational and personal goals relating to professional academic writing. Medium-term investment may be required before the impact of that investment becomes apparent.Originality/valueThis is the first example of social network analysis used to determine characteristics of professional academic writing portfolios over time. Findings inform the type and range of investment required to facilitate academic staff writing activities, specifically those publishing in the area of General Nursing.
16
Hilbert, Fee, Julia Barth, Julia Gremm, Daniel Gros, Jessica Haiter, Maria Henkel, Wilhelm Reinhardt, and Wolfgang G. Stock. "Coverage of academic citation databases compared with coverage of scientific social media." Online Information Review 39, no. 2 (April 13, 2015): 255–64. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/oir-07-2014-0159.
Full textAbstract:
Purpose – The purpose of this paper is to show how the coverage of publications is represented in information services. Academic citation databases (Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar) and scientific social media (Mendeley, CiteULike, BibSonomy) were analyzed by applying a new method: the use of personal publication lists of scientists. Design/methodology/approach – Personal publication lists of scientists of the field of information science were analyzed. All data were taken in collaboration with the scientists in order to guarantee complete publication lists. Findings – The demonstrated calibration parameter shows the coverage of information services in the field of information science. None of the investigated databases reached a coverage of 100 percent. However Google Scholar covers a greater amount of publications than other academic citation databases and scientific social media. Research limitations/implications – Results were limited to the publications of scientists working at an information science department from 2003 to 2012 at German-speaking universities. Practical implications – Scientists of the field of information science are encouraged to review their publication strategy in case of quality and quantity. Originality/value – The paper confirms the usefulness of personal publication lists as a calibration parameter for measuring coverage of information services.
17
Pickett, Jackson B., and Paul Savala. "Rate of publication hastens, but number of publications slows academic promotion." PLOS ONE 17, no. 10 (October 26, 2022): e0276616. http://dx.doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0276616.
Full textAbstract:
Openings for an assistant professor often attract a hundred or more applicants. This allows hiring committees to select highly productive candidates based on their number of publications. Applicants with more rapid publication would be hired with little or no postgraduate experience, but those with slower rates of publication would need more postgraduate experience. Our results show an association of more postgraduate experience, slower rates of publication, a smaller research group, and slower promotion when years are measured from PhD granting; conversely little or no postgraduate experience is generally associated with more rapid publication, a larger research group, and faster promotion. These results suggest the unexpected result that the number and rate of publication have opposite effects on the years from PhD granting to promotion which parametric survival analysis using a log-logistic distribution with gamma frailty confirmed. Statistical analysis revealed that number and rate of publication are reciprocal suppressor variables which were individually weaker predictors of years to promotion, but much more powerful when combined. Intuitively, this is probably because number and rate of publication contain information about other variables with: (1) number of publications being associated with more postgraduate experience, a smaller research group, and slower rates of publication; and (2) rate of publication being associated with a larger research group, and less postgraduate experience. Further, we found that promotion committees closely follow institutional tenure policy requiring promotion a fixed number of years after hiring as an assistant professor which may partially explain why promotion committees fail adjust the number and rate of publication for research group size as fairness in promotion might favor. Our results suggest that both postgraduate experience and research group size influence a professor’s career.
18
Zhang, Gupeng, Libin Xiong, Xiao Wang, Jianing Dong, and Hongbo Duan. "Artificial selection versus natural selection: Which causes the Matthew effect of science funding allocation in China?" Science and Public Policy 47, no. 3 (May 3, 2020): 434–45. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/scipol/scaa024.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract To investigate either artificial or natural selection leads to the Matthew effect in the science funding allocation and its consequences, this study retrieves 274,732 publications by Chinese scientists from the Web of Science and examines how the disparity of science funding determines scientists’ research performance. We employ the Negative Binomial Model and other models to regress the publication’s citation times, which measures the research performance, on the number of funding grants and their amounts of currency that the publication receives, which measures the disparity of science funding. The empirical results suggest an inverted U-shaped relationship. However, the optimum number of funding grants far exceeds the actual number that most publications receive, implying that increasing the funding for academic research positively impacts scientists’ research performance. The natural disparity thus plays a major role in distributing the science funding. Additionally, China’s publication-based academic assessment system may be another main cause.
19
Kreiner, Kristian. "Valuation Ecologies and Academic Governance." Valuation Studies 8, no. 2 (January 20, 2022): 89–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.3384/vs.2001-5992.2021.8.2.89-102.
Full textAbstract:
University managers are forced to assume responsibility for more and more aspects of academic life. This essay focuses on academic publishing and how deans and department heads attempt to manage the volume and quality of publications at their university because others, including politicians and scholars, rate the quality and effectiveness of the university on their publication output. How managers assume and practice this responsibility for academic publishing may seem self-evident but proves to hide both paradoxes and loopholes. Reflections build on an empirical illustration derived from the adoption of a conventional publication strategy. The implementation of this strategy is fueled by a large dose of strategic expediency. However, such expediency incurs costs related to impression management when managers need to show a sense of command in response to a disappointing performance. Both material costs (time and money) and symbolic costs (demonstrating allegiance to an embarrassingly naive conception of academia) are incurred. Exactly because management is exercised on the premise of an embarrassingly naive conception of academia, the presumed coercive forces are exceedingly loose and ineffective. The room for value judgment at all levels of the university organization is not closed but rather enshrined (for good or bad) behind a façade of objectivity and factuality.
20
Hughes, Emma. "Personal Publications Lists Serve as a Reliable Calibration Parameter to Compare Coverage in Academic Citation Databases with Scientific Social Media." Evidence Based Library and Information Practice 12, no. 1 (March 15, 2017): 125. http://dx.doi.org/10.18438/b8md0g.
Full textAbstract:
A Review of:
Hilbert, F., Barth, J., Gremm, J., Gros, D., Haiter, J., Henkel, M., Reinhardt, W., & Stock, W.G. (2015). Coverage of academic citation databases compared with coverage of scientific social media: personal publication lists as calibration parameters. Online Information Review 39(2): 255-264. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/OIR-07-2014-0159
Abstract
Objective – The purpose of this study was to explore coverage rates of information science publications in academic citation databases and scientific social media using a new method of personal publication lists as a calibration parameter. The research questions were: How many publications are covered in different databases, which has the best coverage, and what institutions are represented and how does the language of the publication play a role?
Design – Bibliometric analysis.
Setting – Academic citation databases (Web of Science, Scopus, Google Scholar) and scientific social media (Mendeley, CiteULike, Bibsonomy).
Subjects – 1,017 library and information science publications produced by 76 information scientists at 5 German-speaking universities in Germany and Austria.
Methods – Only documents which were published between 1 January 2003 and 31 December 2012 were included. In that time the 76 information scientists had produced 1,017 documents. The information scientists confirmed that their publication lists were complete and these served as the calibration parameter for the study. The citations from the publication lists were searched in three academic databases: Google Scholar, Web of Science (WoS), and Scopus; as well as three social media citation sites: Mendeley, CiteULike, and BibSonomy and the results were compared. The publications were searched for by author name and words from the title.
Main results – None of the databases investigated had 100% coverage. In the academic databases, Google Scholar had the highest amount of coverage with an average of 63%, Scopus an average of 31%, and lowest was WoS with an average of 15%. On social media sites, Bibsonomy had the highest coverage with an average of 24%, Mendeley had an average coverage of 19%, and the lowest coverage was CiteULike with an average of 8%.
Conclusion – The use of personal publication lists are reliable calibration parameters to compare coverage of information scientists in academic citation databases with scientific social media. Academic citation databases had a higher coverage of publications, in particular, Google Scholar, compared to scientific social media sites. The authors recommend that information scientists personally publish work on social media citation databases to increase exposure. Formulating a publication strategy may be useful to identify journals with the most exposure in academic citation databases. Individuals should be encouraged to keep personal publication lists and these can be used as calibration parameters as a measure of coverage in the future.
21
Millar, Dr Paul E., and Jane Barker. "Gender and Academic Promotion to Full Professor in Ontario." Canadian Journal of Sociology 45, no. 1 (March 29, 2020): 47–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.29173/cjs29365.
Full textAbstract:
This is a study of 933 academic promotions from associate to full professor in Ontario, Canada for the period 2010-2014. Publicly available sources provided a bibliometric profile including gender, year of promotion, university, academic discipline, salary, type and number of publications and number of authors for each promotion to full professor. We found a large gender gap in academic promotions favouring men, which is explained mainly by a structural focus on male-dominated academic disciplines. We also found large differences in numbers of publications by academic discipline, which was substantially reduced after considering the number of authors per publication. Business professors were paid substantially more than other professors at the time of promotion. Our study focused on publications, and given this limitation the results should be taken in the context that there are multiple considerations for promotion. Publication quality and impact, grants and patents, were not adjusted for.
22
Webber, Charles F. "A Revolution in Academic Publication." Education Libraries 28, no. 2 (September 5, 2017): 5. http://dx.doi.org/10.26443/el.v28i2.214.
Full textAbstract:
This paper discusses some of the issues related to e-journals: cost, speed of publication, global access, the politics of academic publication, and reduced control of publication houses. E-journals are also examined relative to their impact on academic responsibility, the peer review process, censorship, credibility, and academic literacy skill development. Commonly-cited drawbacks of e-journals are critiqued, e.g., archiving, range of quality, institutional acceptance, cost of technology, and plagiarism. The paper proposes a framework for assessing both e-journals and traditional print journals.
23
Greener, Sue. "Academic rigour versus rapid publication." Interactive Learning Environments 29, no. 6 (August 18, 2021): 881–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/10494820.2021.1974748.
Full text
24
Wen, Qiufang, and Yihong Gao. "Dual publication and academic inequality." International Journal of Applied Linguistics 17, no. 2 (July 2007): 221–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1473-4192.2007.00147.x.
Full text
25
Rydberg-Cox, Jeffrey. "Electronic Publication and Academic Promotion." Syllecta Classica 16, no. 1 (2005): 247–61. http://dx.doi.org/10.1353/syl.2005.0003.
Full text
26
Ou, Amy Y., Luisa Varriale, and Anne S. Tsui. "International Collaboration for Academic Publication." Group & Organization Management 37, no. 4 (June 13, 2012): 407–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/1059601112448422.
Full text
27
Klaus, Peter. "Today's Challenge for Academic Publication." Logistics Research 1, no. 2 (September 2009): 69–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s12159-009-0016-7.
Full text
28
Lecklitner, Myron L. "Young Academic Physicians and Publication." JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 255, no. 15 (April 18, 1986): 2023. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.1986.03370150065016.
Full text
29
Yamin, Mohammad. "KEBIJAKAN LITERASI UNTUK MENINGKATKAN PRODUKTIVITAS PUBLIKASI DI PERGURUAN TINGGI." JAS-PT Jurnal Analisis Sistem Pendidikan Tinggi 2, no. 1 (July 31, 2018): 19. http://dx.doi.org/10.36339/jaspt.v2i1.120.
Full textAbstract:
This research studies the importance of literacy as an integral part of building a higher education institution through upholding the academic culture. This study is a policy study that analyzes the act of higher education, technology, and research No. 20/2017. This study deals with the need for universities to encourage every lecturer to revive the academic atmosphere and one of them is a scientific publication as the manifestation of the three tasks of higher education. It means that when the academic atmosphere of publication is formed well, it can encourage lecturers to write the scientific publications.
Keywords: literacy policy, scientific publication, and three tasks of higher education
30
Kartvelishvili, V. M., D. S. Krynetskiy, and A. S. Yusupova. "About Optimization Methods Printing Activity." Vestnik of the Plekhanov Russian University of Economics, no. 6 (December 18, 2018): 172–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.21686/2413-2829-2018-6-172-184.
Full textAbstract:
The article considers publication activity of academic and pedagogical workers of the university as an important criterion of the organization and its personnel work. Publication activity is an indirect presentation of results of employees' research work. The review of leading bases of academic citing of Russian authors, including international ones (Web of Scince, Scopus), as international publication activity shows the degree of science development in the Russian Federation in comparison with science in other countries. The article investigates the interrelation of subjective in-university assessment of the author's publication activity and objective positioning of the employee's works in academic community through local indicators of awarding and score rating fixed by the university, which in their turn can become a key administrative way of stimulating publication activity. The optimization task of creating a bonus plan for publications taking into account structural and budgetary constraints, as well as psychosocial aspects of the behavior of authors, was solved.
31
Risal, S., and H. N. Prasad. "Some scientific publications of BPKIHS: a bibliometric study of articles listed in the Web of Science." Health Renaissance 10, no. 2 (July 30, 2012): 139–43. http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/hren.v10i2.6584.
Full textAbstract:
Scientific productivity of any academic institution is expressed by the total number of publications generated by its academic faculties and the use of the publication by scientific community. Citation analysis is done to evaluate the use of the publications. Use of the publication can be studied with the help of bibliometric analysis. Counting publication, publications trends, authorship patterns and citation analysis are parts of bibliometric analysis. Web of Science is one of the best databases which allow the study in the use of the publications through citation analysis. In this article, scientific articles produced by the faculties and other international affiliated faculties of BP Koirala Institute of Health Sciences have been studied. Citation analysis of scientific publications of BP Koirala Institute of Health Sciences is done with the help of the Web of Science, a product of Thomason Reuters.DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/hren.v10i2.6584 Health Renaissance 2012; Vol 10 (No.2); 139-143
32
Allen, Kelly-Ann, Gregory M. Donoghue Dr, Saeed Pahlevansharif Dr, Shane R. Jimerson Professor, and John A. C. Hattie Professor. "Addressing academic rejection: Recommendations for reform." Journal of University Teaching and Learning Practice 17, no. 5 (December 1, 2020): 302–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.53761/1.17.5.19.
Full textAbstract:
The aim of this paper is to provide a number of reasoned and evidence-supported arguments and a list of recommendations for reducing the impact of academic rejection. A brief literature review examined the prevalence and negative impacts of academic rejection including its purported purposes, predictors, and consequences. Findings revealed that the topic of academic rejection is largely under-studied, with very few empirical investigations. The extant literature typically places the onus on the individual academic to deal with rejection. Few articles have recommended institutional changes to ameliorate the known mental health impacts of rejection. We propose that the discovery and dissemination of knowledge are among the core purposes of academia, and that scholars are far more likely to contribute through institutional and systemic support. Several elements of the current approaches are contraindicated, thus, we recommend several changes, at both the individual and institutional levels to reduce opportunity costs for grants and funding, improve the publication process, and promote academics’ mental health and wellbeing. When examining academic rejection through the lens of effective learning, the vast literature of feedback can support important changes to how publications are accepted and rejected. Considering the limited literature pertaining to academic rejection, we present recommendations for changes in how academic performance can be evaluated, for the benefit of both the academy and the mental health of its members.
33
Lin, Wei-Chao, Chih-Fong Tsai, and Shih-Wen Ke. "Correlation analysis for comparison of the citation impact of journals, magazines, and conferences in computer science." Online Information Review 39, no. 3 (June 8, 2015): 310–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/oir-11-2014-0273.
Full textAbstract:
Purpose – In many research areas, there are a variety of different types of academic publications, including journals, magazines and conferences, which provide outlets for researchers to present their findings. Generally speaking, although there are differences in the reviewing criteria and publication processes of different publication types, in the same research area, there is certainly overlap in terms of the problems addressed and the audience for different publication types. Therefore, the research impacts of different publication types in the same research area should be moderately or highly correlated. The paper aims to discuss these issues. Design/methodology/approach – To prove this hypothesis, the authors examine the correlation coefficient of citation impacts for different types of publications, in seven research areas of computer science, from 2000 to 2013. In particular, four related citation statistics are examined for each publication type, which are average citations per paper, average citations per year, average annual increase in individual h-index, and h-index. Findings – The analysis results show only a partial correlation in terms of several specific citation measures for different publication types in the same research area. Moreover, the level of correlation of the citation impact between different publication types is different, depending on the research area. Originality/value – The contribution of this paper is to investigate whether the research impact of different types of publications in the same area is correlated. The findings can help guide researchers and academics choose the most appropriate publication outlets.
34
Sawitri, Anak Agung Sagung. "Ethical violations and the publication of journal articles." Public Health and Preventive Medicine Archive 7, no. 2 (December 1, 2019): 73. http://dx.doi.org/10.15562/phpma.v7i2.230.
Full textAbstract:
There is a high demand for publication in the form of scientific articles in reputable journals in the academic world in Indonesia. Research publication in reputable or accredited national journals is required for graduation from tertiary institutions for master level students.Publication in reputable international journals is also a requirement for doctoral-level students graduation. For teaching staff, research publication in the form of peer reviewed journal articles is also a requirement for higher levels in the academic career. The increasing demand for scientific publication also reported globally. Furthermore, various reported reasons for publication include adding work resumes, for job promotion, obtaining funding grants, competition among colleagues or proving supremacy, and even in some universities, the history of publications is used as the criteria for determining dissertation internal and external examiners.
35
Paliadelis, Penny, Vicki Parker, Glenda Parmenter, and Myf Maple. "‘Right' for publication: strategies for supporting novice writers across health and medical disciplines." Australian Health Review 39, no. 2 (2015): 165. http://dx.doi.org/10.1071/ah14104.
Full textAbstract:
The idea that scholarly writing is an integral part of academic and clinical work is not new; however, increasing expectations that health professionals contribute to research output through publication, regardless of level of employment or experience, creates anxiety and dissonance for many novice and sometimes not-so-novice writers. Publications and the impact of scholarly work have become the key indicators not only of the performance of individual health academics, but also of health disciplines and universities more broadly. In Australia, as in many other countries, publications as the measure of research impact and outputs are expected in professional disciplines, universities and schools. Research impact is assessed and rated against other institutions and used as a means of allocating scarce research funding. Publishing has become a matter of professional reputation and sustainability. This paper reports on a project designed to enhance publication rates across health disciplines based at a rural university, where many staff members combine academic work with ongoing clinical roles. Without deliberate and focused support to enhance skills and confidence in writing it was unlikely that these academics and clinical staff members would be able to develop the kind of track record required for a successful academic career or promotion. This paper outlines the development, delivery and outcomes of this university-funded project, which drew on evidence in the literature to increase the publication rates across two Schools (Health and Medicine) at a rural university. What is known about the topic? The dissemination of scholarly work is an expectation in most health disciplines, and there are numerous strategies presented in the literature designed to boost publication rates. However, the expectation to publish becomes more challenging because many teaching positions straddle both clinical and academic roles. This article reports on a project focused on increasing the rate of published work by implementing some of the strategies discussed in the literature. What does this paper add? This paper describes the development, delivery and outcomes of a project focused on implementing strategies discussed in the literature to increase the confidence and competence of clinical and academic health professionals to publish their scholarly, project-based and research work. What are the implications for practitioners? With many health professionals combining clinical and teaching roles, there is an expectation that as they progress through their careers they can demonstrate evidence of scholarly publications. This paper provides an overview of the development and delivery of a strategy to encourage health professionals to publish that may be useful across a range of health settings.
36
Șuteu, Cristina. "The Assessment of Originality in Academic Research." Studia Universitatis Babeş-Bolyai Musica 67, no. 1 (June 30, 2022): 165–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.24193/subbmusica.2022.1.11.
Full textAbstract:
"Nowadays, for those working in the academic field, the list of publications has become an essential condition in justifying the research activity. “To be or not to be” published in high-ranking journals and indexed in databases is a criterion in the evaluation of any researcher. In some cases, originality is a sine qua non condition for acceptance or publication. And yet sometimes the definition of the concept of “originality” is confusing in some cases. The novice researcher (and not only) needs some terminological clarifications and contextualization in the daily practice. In this sense, this paper offers possible answers to the questions: what is considered to be research? what is originality in research and why is it important? who and how evaluates originality in research? This last interrogation is the key question of the article, and the answer is presented on two main coordinates: the pre-publication evaluation (performed by the author himself followed by the peer-reviewer) and the post-publication evaluation (performed by Altmetrics and again by the author). Therefore, the whole process of evaluation is viewed from the perspective of a cycle that begins and ends with the author. Keywords: research, originality, peer-review, databases, Altmetrics, databases, citations "
37
Rahmatulloh, Alam, and Rohmat Gunawan. "Web Scraping with HTML DOM Method for Data Collection of Scientific Articles from Google Scholar." Indonesian Journal of Information Systems 2, no. 2 (February 26, 2020): 16. http://dx.doi.org/10.24002/ijis.v2i2.3029.
Full textAbstract:
Google Scholar is a web-based service for searching a broad academic literature. Various types of references can be accessed such as: peer-reviewed papers, theses, books, abstracts and articles from academic publishers, professional communities, pre-printed data centers, universities and other academic organizations. Google Scholar provides the profile creation feature of every researcher, expert and lecturer. Quantity of publication from an academic institution along with detailed data on the publication of scientific articles can be accessed through Google Scholar. A recap of the publication of scientific articles of each researcher in an institution or organization is needed to determine the research performance collectively. But the problems that occur, the unavailability of recap services for publishing scientific articles for each researcher in an institution or organization. So that the scientific article publication data can be utilized by academic institutions or organizations, this research will take data from Google Scholar to make a recap of scientific article publication data by applying web scraping technology. Implementation of web scraping can help to take the available resources on the web and the results can be utilized by other applications. By doing web scraping on Google Scholar, collective scientific article publication data can be obtained. So that the process of making scientific publications data recap can be done quickly. Experiments in this study have succeeded in taking 236 researchers data from Google Scholar, with 9 attributes, and 2,420 articles.
38
To, W. M., and Billy T. W. Yu. "Rise in higher education researchers and academic publications." Emerald Open Research 2 (January 30, 2020): 3. http://dx.doi.org/10.35241/emeraldopenres.13437.1.
Full textAbstract:
Background: How many higher education researchers are there in the world? How many academic articles are published by researchers each year? This paper aims to answer these two questions by tracking the number of higher education teachers and the number of publications over the past four decades. Methods: We collected data on the number of higher education institutions and researchers from the United Nations, the World Bank, and the U.S., China, and U.K. governments (three countries with the largest number of academic publications in recent years). We used Scopus to obtain the number of publications per year. The growth of higher education researchers and academic publications were characterized using 4-parameter logistic models. Results: The number of higher education teachers-cum-researchers increased from 4 million in 1980 to 13.1 million in 2018 worldwide. Concurrently, the number of academic publications increased from 0.65 million in 1980 to 3.16 million in 2018 based on data from Scopus. At the country level, the number of academic publications from the U.S. increased from 0.15 million in 1980 to 0.70 million in 2018, while that from China increased by almost 1,000 times from 629 in 1980 to 0.60 million in 2018. Conclusions: The number of higher education researchers would reach 13.6 million and they would publish 3.21 million academic articles in 2020, imposing enormous pressure to publishers, peer-reviewers, and people who want to understand emerging scientific development. Additionally, not all academic publications are easily assessable because most articles are behind pay-walls. In addition, unethical research practices including falsification, fabrication, plagiarism, slicing publication, publication in a predatory journal or conference, etc. may hinder scientific and human development.
39
Papanikos, Gregory T. "Predatory Publications in the Era of Internet and Technology: A Comment." Athens Journal of Mass Media and Communications 8, no. 4 (September 29, 2022): 257–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.30958/ajmmc.8-4-3.
Full textAbstract:
In an article published in this journal entitled “Predatory publications in the era of internet and technology: Open access publications are at risk”, Akhilesh Kumar, Ravi Gupta, Krishna Kant Tripathi & Rajani Ranjan Singh argue that the definition of predatory publications defame the open access journals putting the sustainability of these type of publications at risk which mushroomed in the age of internet and electronic freedom in disseminating academic and non-academic information. This note comments on their paper by arguing that (a) predatory practices are ubiquitous in the academic world, not only in publications; (b) charging a fee does not make an academic practice predatory; and (c) in the long-term no publication or an academic practice can survive if it does not offer some sort of “satisfaction” to users (readers and authors). The argument of peer review or not is irrelevant because a publication, once it becomes available, is constantly reviewed by its readers who are the ultimate judges of its quality. At the end of the day, what counts are the number of readers and the number of citations of a published work. Thanks to the internet these are now easily measurable. Keywords: open access, predatory journals, article processing charges, peer review
40
Kasatkin, P. I., J. A. Kovalchuk, and I. M. Stepnov. "The Financial Component of the Scientific Publication’s Value Original article." Vysshee Obrazovanie v Rossii = Higher Education in Russia 31, no. 12 (December 21, 2022): 85–102. http://dx.doi.org/10.31992/0869-3617-2022-31-12-85-102.
Full textAbstract:
Publication activity in modern society is presented as a driving force of scientific and technological development and as an indicator of university management reporting. The article is devoted to the study of approaches to determining the monetary value of a scientific publication, taking into account different behavior’s motives of researchers and teachers in higher education as authors. The methodological basis of the study was formed by concepts of creating a public good and financial good, concepts of scientific productivity and academic remuneration, neoclassical and neoinstitutional economic theories, approaches to the implementation of state policy in the field of science and education in terms of stimulating scientific publications. Research methods: critical and comparative analysis, with the inclusion of three groups of methods: a) the study of direct and indirect authors’ motives and traps in the publication of scientific papers; b) asset evaluation methods; c) a combination of socio-economic campaigns for monetary evaluation of the results of scientific research. Asset valuation approaches have been adapted to assess the scientific publication’s value from the position of the author as a beneficiary. The theoretical and practical significance of the research lies in the contribution to the value dimension of scientific publications for their authors in the conditions of academic capitalism with potential opportunities to receive monetary income from the results of their research.
41
Zhang, Jinsong, Bao Jin, Junyi Sha, Yan Chen, and Yijin Zhang. "SentenceLDA- and ConNetClus-Based Heterogeneous Academic Network Analysis for Publication Ranking." Algorithms 15, no. 5 (May 10, 2022): 159. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/a15050159.
Full textAbstract:
Scientific papers published in journals or conferences, also considered academic publications, are the manifestation of scientific research achievements. Lots of scientific papers published in digital form bring new challenges for academic evaluation and information retrieval. Therefore, research on the ranking method of scientific papers is significant for the management and evaluation of academic resources. In this paper, we first identify internal and external factors for evaluating scientific papers and propose a publication ranking method based on an analysis of a heterogeneous academic network. We use four types of metadata (i.e., author, venue (journal or conference), topic, and title) as vertexes for creating the network; in there, the topics are trained by the SentenceLDA algorithm with the metadata of the abstract. We then use the Gibbs sampling method to create a heterogeneous academic network and apply the ConNetClus algorithm to calculate the probability value of publication ranking. To evaluate the significance of the method proposed in this paper, we compare the ranking results with BM25, PageRank, etc., and homogeneous networks in MAP and NDCG. As shown in our evaluation results, the performance of the method we propose in this paper is better than other baselines for ranking publications.
42
TAHMOORESNEJAD, LEILA, and CATHERINE BEAUDRY. "DOES GOVERNMENT FUNDING HAVE THE SAME IMPACT ON ACADEMIC PUBLICATIONS AND PATENTS? THE CASE OF NANOTECHNOLOGY IN CANADA." International Journal of Innovation Management 19, no. 03 (May 27, 2015): 1540001. http://dx.doi.org/10.1142/s1363919615400010.
Full textAbstract:
University patenting has become an important research outcome in the past few decades. There has been an increase in the number of faculty patents and individual scientists listed as inventors on patent applications. The effective allocation of funding to universities is of great concern to policymakers. In this paper, we evaluate whether an increase in government funding for academic scientists enhances the performance of researchers in both scientific publications and academic patents or if this merely increases publications in the academic realm. We provide summary statistics from nanotechnology data in Quebec, compare it with other provinces in Canada, and build econometric models of various publication, patenting and grant databases. The analysis illustrates the strong relationship between funding and publication productivity as well as the citation impact of publications. In the light of research performance in patenting activities of academic researchers, this empirical study finds a strong influence on the number of patents. Moreover, increased funding appears to strengthen the citation impact of patents in Quebec, which affects the citation impact of patenting activities.
43
Dobrynina, Oksana L. "ACADEMIC WRITING FOR RESEARCH PUBLICATION PURPOSES." Lifelong education: the XXI century 25, no. 1 (March 2019): 92–100. http://dx.doi.org/10.15393/j5.art.2019.4485.
Full text
44
E. H. Boeckstyns, Michel, Tim Hems, Geoffrey Hooper, Wee Lam, Mike Ruettermann, and Jin Bo Tang. "Publication ethics: maintaining sound academic standards." Journal of Hand Surgery (European Volume) 46, no. 9 (October 8, 2021): 925–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/17531934211050872.
Full text
45
Simkhada, PP, E. Van Teijlingen, and V. Hundley. "Writing an academic paper for publication." Health Renaissance 11, no. 1 (February 10, 2013): 1–5. http://dx.doi.org/10.3126/hren.v11i1.7592.
Full text
46
Malouff, John, Nicola Schutte, and Jennifer Priest. "Publication rates of Australian academic psychologists." Australian Psychologist 45, no. 2 (June 2010): 78–83. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/00050060903078536.
Full text
47
Horiuchi, Shigeko. "International Trends of Academic Journal Publication." Journal of Japan Academy of Nursing Science 30, no. 4 (2010): 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.5630/jans.30.4_1.
Full text
48
Cheng, L., A. Sadler, and Ed Bailey. "Independent (self) publication for academic books." International Journal of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery 48 (May 2019): 181–82. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ijom.2019.03.562.
Full text
49
Strasburger, Victor C. "Young Academic Physicians and Publication-Reply." JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association 255, no. 15 (April 18, 1986): 2024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1001/jama.1986.03370150065017.
Full text
50
Sheldon, Elena. "‘We cannot abandon the two worlds, we have to be in both’." Journal of English for Research Publication Purposes 1, no. 2 (November 30, 2020): 120–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/jerpp.19016.she.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract This study investigates how the importance of English in academia has impacted the academic life of fourteen researchers in the humanities and social sciences (HSS) at one university in Chile and uses semi-structured interviews focussing on scholarly publication. The study intends to discover, firstly, what the national and the university policies are regarding publishing in Spanish and English in Chile; secondly, how important it is to publish in English and Spanish, with respect to the researchers’ disciplines; and, thirdly, whether researchers with expertise in English are better off in terms of publication than those who lack this expertise. Findings suggest that these researchers write more publications in Spanish than in English, but favour publishing in both languages, counterbalancing the spread of English as the dominant language of publication in academia because Spanish and English can co-exist without threatening the scholarly cultural traditions of Spanish scholars. These scholars also recognise that publishing in English assists them to attain a wider readership, and to gain greater monetary rewards for publication in high impact journals, usually in English, as a result of increased grants and promotions. Finally, the paper suggests considering practices for teaching English for Research Publication Purposes.