Log in

Relevant bibliographies by topics / Accelerated orthodontics

Contents

Journal articles

Academic literature on the topic 'Accelerated orthodontics'

Author: Grafiati

Published: 4 June 2021

Last updated: 1 February 2022

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Accelerated orthodontics.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Accelerated orthodontics"

1

Narendra, Suryakanta, N. C. Sahani, and Sanghamitra Jena. "Application of surgical periodontics for accelerated orthodontic correction of class ll division l malocclusion with skeletal discrepancy." International Journal of Research in Medical Sciences 5, no. 7 (2017): 2870. http://dx.doi.org/10.18203/2320-6012.ijrms20172615.

Full text

Abstract:

Background: There is a constant pursuit for substituting orthognathic surgical options by minimally invasive pre-orthodontic surgical procedures. Application of osseous resective surgery for alveolar reshaping is referred to here as "surgical periodontics for accelerated orthodontics". A parallel randomized clinical trial was designed to evaluate the clinical outcome of class 2 division 1 malocclusion with skeletal discrepancy using pre-orthodontic surgical procedures, comparing periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics with surgical periodontics for accelerated orthodontics.Methods: Twenty-four adult orthodontics patients selected for this study were randomly divided into 2 equal groups. One group was treated with periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics with augmentation grafting and the other was with surgical periodontics for accelerated orthodontics. These procedures were followed by fixed orthodontics treatment. Comparative evaluation of alveolar bone thickness was done by cone beam computed tomogram for both the groups.Results: The cephalometric parameters, A point nasion B point (ANB) angle and over jet of these subjects before and after the surgical interventions at three, six and twelve month’s intervals were compared to the base values, showing changes within 3 months when treated with surgical periodontics for accelerated orthodontics and within 6 months when treated with periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics, without significant change in periodontal supporting alveolar bone thickness.Conclusions: Surgical periodontics for accelerated orthodontics and periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics are effective pre-orthodontics surgical procedures for accelerating orthodontic treatment, without bringing any change in periodontal alveolar bone thickness.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

2

Sidiqha, Nishat, Nausheer Ahmed, and Shraddha Suryavanshi. "Accelerated orthodontics." IP Indian Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Research 5, no. 2 (2019): 47–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.18231/j.ijodr.2019.011.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

3

Mandar N, Pathak, and Tohid Mujawar. "Accelerated orthodontics: A review on methods of accelerated orthodontic treatment." Global Journal of Dental Specialty 1, no. 2 (2021): 1–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.53647/gjds.2021.v01i02.01.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

4

Panda, Ananya. "Accelerated Orthodontics: A Boost to Orthodontic Treatment." Indian Journal of Public Health Research & Development 10, no. 9 (2019): 1652. http://dx.doi.org/10.5958/0976-5506.2019.02691.3.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

5

Umeh, O. D., I. G. Isiekwe, O. O. DaCosta, O. O. Sanu, I. L. Utomi, and M. Izuka. "Attitude and perception of orthodontic patients to orthodontic treatment time and accelerated orthodontics." African Journal of Oral Health 9, no. 2 (2020): 28–39. http://dx.doi.org/10.4314/ajoh.v9i2.2.

Full text

Abstract:

Objectives: The purpose of this study was to evaluate the a􀄴itude and perception of orthodontic patients to the duration of orthodontic treatment and the procedures for accelerating orthodontic tooth movement.Methods: This was a cross-sectional analytical study. The study population was made up of patients undergoing fixed appliance orthodontic treatment at the Orthodontic Unit of the Lagos University Teaching Hospital. A convenience sampling technique was used and data collection was via selfadministered questionnaires and an information sheet. The questionnaires assessed patients' knowledge of accelerated orthodontic procedures as well as their perception of orthodontic treatment time and willingness to undergo some accelerated orthodontic treatment procedures. The procedures evaluated included corticotomy, piezocision, micro-osteoperforation, laser therapy, local administration of injections and use of vibrations.Results: One hundred orthodontic patients (n=100, adolescents, 46%; adults, 54%) were surveyed comprising 36 males and 64 females. Most of the participants (88%) had never heard of accelerated orthodontics. A majority of respondents (75%) believed that orthodontic treatment time was too long, and were willing to undergo additional procedures to reduce treatment time (81%). Subjects' willingness to undergo the procedures were inversely proportional to the degree of its invasiveness for all groups, with at least a third of the patients willing to accept a 10% increase in treatment fees for a reduction in treatment time across all techniques surveyed.Conclusion: The orthodontic patients surveyed considered treatment time protracted and were interested in undergoing adjunctive orthodontic procedures to accelerate tooth movement, with a consequent increase in treatment cost. They, however, had a limited knowledge of the different methods of accelerating orthodontic treatment. Key words: Accelerated orthodontics, orthodontic treatment time

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

6

Jerrold, Laurance. "Accelerated orthodontics or accelerated liability?" American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 145, no. 4 (2014): S148—S151. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2014.01.001.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

7

Al-Attar, Ali M., Samher Al-Shaham, and Mushriq Abid. "Perception of Iraqi Orthodontists and Patients toward Accelerated Orthodontics." International Journal of Dentistry 2021 (April 29, 2021): 1–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2021/5512455.

Full text

Abstract:

Background/Purpose. In the literature, no consensus about the duration of orthodontic treatment has been reached out. This study aimed to identify orthodontist’s and patient’s perception about the time of orthodontic treatment and their willingness to undergo and pay for various acceleration techniques and procedures. Materials and Methods. An electronic survey was conducted from August to October 2020. The questionnaire consisted of 20 multiple choice questions which was designed and emailed to members of the Iraqi Orthodontic Society and self-administered to patients in several orthodontic centers in Baghdad. The questionnaire included questions about the perception toward the duration of orthodontic treatment, approval of different procedures used to reduce treatment time, and how much fee increment they are able to pay for various techniques and appliances. Descriptive and chi-square test statistics were used, and the level of significance was set at p ≤ 0.05 . Results. The response rate was 78.7%. The willingness for additional techniques and procedures was rated in the following order: customized appliances: 50.8% orthodontists and 38.4% patients, followed by intraoral vibrating devices: 49.2% orthodontists and 38.1% patients, piezocision: 10.2% orthodontists and 8.2% patients, and corticotomies: 8.1% orthodontists and 5.9% patients. Most orthodontists were willing to pay up to 40% of treatment income for the acceleration procedure, while the payment of patients was up to 20%. Conclusion. Both orthodontists and patients were interested in techniques that can decrease the treatment duration. Noninvasive accelerating procedures were more preferable by orthodontists and patients than invasive surgical procedures.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

8

Murphy, Neal C. "Accelerated Osteogenic Orthodontics." American Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Orthopedics 137, no. 1 (2010): 2. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.ajodo.2009.11.003.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

9

Surender, B., P. Kiran Kumar, R. Naveen, and T. Saritha. "Accelerated Osteogenic Orthodontics." IP Indian Journal of Orthodontics and Dentofacial Research 5, no. 1 (2019): 1–4. http://dx.doi.org/10.18231/j.ijodr.2019.001.

Full text

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

10

Donald J., Ferguson, Irelia Machado, M. Thomas Wilcko, and William M. Wilcko. "Root resorption following periodontally accelerated osteogenic orthodontics." APOS Trends in Orthodontics 6 (March 4, 2016): 78–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.4103/2321-1407.177961.

Full text

Abstract:

Background Literature evidence suggests that root resorption, an adverse side effect of orthodontic therapy, may be decreased under conditions of alveolar osteopenia, a condition characterized by diminished bone density and created secondary to alveolar corticotomy (Cort) surgery. Purpose To compare root resorption of the maxillary central incisors following nonextraction orthodontic therapy with and without Cort surgery. Materials and Methods The sample comprised two groups, with and without Cort and was matched by age and gender: Cort-facilitated nonextraction orthodontics with 27 subjects, 53 central incisors of mean age 24.8 ± 10.2 years, and conventional (Conv) nonextraction orthodontics with 27 subjects, 54 incisors with mean age of 19.6 ± 8.8 years. All periapical radiographs were taken with the paralleling technique; total tooth lengths of the right and left central incisors were measured by projecting and enlarging the periapical radiographs exactly 8 times. Results t-tests revealed a significant decrease in treatment time in the Cort group (6.3 ± 8.0 vs. 17.4 ± 20.2 months,P = 0.000). Pretreatment root lengths were not significantly different (P = 0.11), but Conv had significantly shorter roots at posttreatment when compared with Cort (P = 0.03). Significant root resorption (P < 0.01) occurred in both Cort (0.3 mm) and Conv (0.7 mm), but the increment of change was significantly greater in Conv (P < 0.03). The variable SNA increased significantly in the Cort (P = 0.001) group and decreased significantly in the Conv group (P < 0.001). Conclusions Based on the conditions of this study, it may be concluded that Cort-facilitated nonextraction orthodontic therapy results in less root resorption and enhanced alveolar support within a significantly reduced clinical service delivery time frame. Rapid orthodontic treatment and reduced apical root resorption are probably due to the transient osteopenia induced by the Cort surgery and inspired by regional acceleratory phenomenon.

APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

More sources

We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!