To see the other types of publications on this topic, follow the link: ACOG.

Journal articles on the topic 'ACOG'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the top 50 journal articles for your research on the topic 'ACOG.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Browse journal articles on a wide variety of disciplines and organise your bibliography correctly.

1

Huang, Min, Fred Bernd Oppermann-Sanio, and Alexander Steinbüchel. "Biochemical and Molecular Characterization of theBacillus subtilis Acetoin Catabolic Pathway." Journal of Bacteriology 181, no. 12 (1999): 3837–41. http://dx.doi.org/10.1128/jb.181.12.3837-3841.1999.

Full text
Abstract:
ABSTRACT A recent study indicated that Bacillus subtiliscatabolizes acetoin by enzymes encoded by the acu gene cluster (F. J. Grundy, D. A. Waters, T. Y. Takova, and T. M. Henkin, Mol. Microbiol. 10:259–271, 1993) that are completely different from those in the multicomponent acetoin dehydrogenase enzyme system (AoDH ES) encoded by aco gene clusters found before in all other bacteria capable of utilizing acetoin as the sole carbon source for growth. By hybridization with a DNA probe covering acoA and acoB of the AoDH ES from Clostridium magnum, genomic fragments from B. subtilis harboring acoA, acoB,acoC, acoL, and acoR homologous genes were identified, and some of them were functionally expressed inE. coli. Furthermore, acoA was inactivated inB. subtilis by disruptive mutagenesis; these mutants were impaired to express PPi-dependent AoDH E1 activity to remove acetoin from the medium and to grow with acetoin as the carbon source. Therefore, acetoin is catabolized in B. subtilis by the same mechanism as all other bacteria investigated so far, leaving the function of the previously described acu genes obscure.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Santoli, Carmen M. A., Sarah K. Dotters‐Katz, Teresa N. Sparks, and Jeffrey A. Kuller. "An overview of current prenatal genetic screening and diagnosis guidelines." Pregnancy 1, no. 3 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1002/pmf2.70016.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractThe landscape of prenatal genetics continues to evolve rapidly, with improvements in processing speed and technology. Clinicians are tasked with staying current with the latest recommendations for prenatal genetic screening and diagnosis in order to provide patient‐centered and evidence‐based care. We present a review of 15 societal guidelines that have been published or reaffirmed between 2016 and 2023 from the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (ACOG), Society for Maternal Fetal Medicine (SMFM), American College of Medical Genetics and Genomics (ACMG), and International Society for Prenatal Diagnosis (ISPD). We provide a summary of the current guidance for carrier screening, cell‐free DNA (cfDNA) screening, and prenatal diagnostic testing, and also discuss key genetic principles. In brief, there are several approaches to prenatal carrier screening that range from a few select conditions (hemoglobinopathies, spinal muscular atrophy, cystic fibrosis) to several hundreds through expanded carrier screening panels. Both ACOG and ACMG support prenatal (ideally preconception) carrier screening, although have differing guidance about the optimal approach and number of conditions to screen. With regards to cfDNA screening, ACOG, SMFM, ACMG, and ISPD recommend offering all patients the option to screen for common aneuploidies, with consideration of sex chromosome aneuploidies after counseling. While ACOG, SMFM, and ISPD do not endorse microdeletion screening with cfDNA, ACMG supports cfDNA screening for 22q11.2 deletion syndrome. The societies are unanimous in recommending against cfDNA evaluation of rare autosomal trisomies. Finally, in terms of diagnostic testing, ACOG, SMFM, ACMG, and ISPD recommend offering chromosomal microarray for evaluation of fetal structural anomalies, stillbirth, and confirmation of screening results. Next‐generation sequencing with fetal exome or genome sequencing is recommended by ACMG, ISPD, and SMFM for evaluation of fetal anomalies following normal karyotype and/or microarray. ACOG, on the other hand, does not currently endorse fetal exome or genome sequencing outside of a research setting. Clinicians must have robust genetic literacy in order to understand current guidance and testing methodologies, discuss the benefits and limitations of genetic screening and diagnostic testing options, and engage in equitable and evidence‐based clinical practice.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

"ACOG." Obstetrics & Gynecology 129, no. 1 (2017): 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000001855.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

"ACOG." Obstetrics & Gynecology 129, no. 1 (2017): 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000001860.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

"ACOG." Obstetrics & Gynecology 129, no. 6 (2017): 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000002052.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

"ACOG." Obstetrics & Gynecology 129, no. 6 (2017): 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000002111.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

"ACOG." Obstetrics & Gynecology 130, no. 4 (2017): 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000002348.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

"ACOG." Obstetrics & Gynecology 130, no. 4 (2017): 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000002353.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

"ACOG." Obstetrics & Gynecology 133, no. 1 (2019): 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000003018.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

"ACOG." Obstetrics & Gynecology 133, no. 1 (2019): 1. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000003019.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
11

"ACOG Publications." Obstetrics & Gynecology 137, no. 2 (2021): 383–84. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000004242.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
12

"ACOG Publications." Obstetrics & Gynecology 137, no. 6 (2021): 1129–30. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000004400.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
13

"ACOG Publications." Obstetrics & Gynecology 137, no. 4 (2021): 756–57. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000004323.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
14

"ACOG Publications." Obstetrics & Gynecology 137, no. 3 (2021): 551. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000004300.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
15

"ACOG Publications." Obstetrics & Gynecology 140, no. 1 (2022): 139. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000004831.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
16

"ACOG Publications." Obstetrics & Gynecology 140, no. 2 (2022): 347. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000004865.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
17

"ACOG Publications." Obstetrics & Gynecology 140, no. 3 (2022): 529. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000004894.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
18

"ACOG Publications." Obstetrics & Gynecology 140, no. 4 (2022): 707. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000004926.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
19

"ACOG Publications." Obstetrics & Gynecology 139, no. 4 (2022): 699. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000004707.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
20

"ACOG Publications." Obstetrics & Gynecology 139, no. 5 (2022): 944. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000004747.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
21

"ACOG Publications." Obstetrics & Gynecology 139, no. 6 (2022): 1199–200. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000004797.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
22

"ACOG Publications." Obstetrics & Gynecology 139, no. 1 (2022): 152. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000004618.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
23

"ACOG Publications." Obstetrics & Gynecology 137, no. 5 (2021): 963. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000004358.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
24

"ACOG Publications." Obstetrics & Gynecology 138, no. 6 (2021): 949. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000004600.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
25

"ACOG Publications." Obstetrics & Gynecology 138, no. 5 (2021): 822–23. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000004580.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
26

"ACOG Publications." Obstetrics & Gynecology 138, no. 2 (2021): 317–18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000004481.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
27

"ACOG Publications." Obstetrics & Gynecology 138, no. 1 (2021): 157. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000004451.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
28

"ACOG Publications." Obstetrics & Gynecology 138, no. 3 (2021): 493. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000004523.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
29

"ACOG Publications." Obstetrics & Gynecology 139, no. 2 (2022): 347–49. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000004651.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
30

"ACOG Publications." Obstetrics & Gynecology 139, no. 3 (2022): 476. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000004682.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
31

"ACOG Publications." Obstetrics & Gynecology 138, no. 4 (2021): 686–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000004546.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
32

"ACOG Publications." Obstetrics & Gynecology 140, no. 5 (2022): 903. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000004952.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
33

"ACOG Publications." Obstetrics & Gynecology 111, no. 3 (2008): 783. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/01.aog.0000291584.62489.79.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
34

"ACOG Publications." Obstetrics & Gynecology 145, no. 1 (2025): 125. https://doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000005785.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
35

"ACOG publications." Obstetrics & Gynecology 144, no. 5 (2024): 741. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000005717.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
36

"ACOG Publications." Obstetrics & Gynecology 144, no. 4 (2024): 573. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000005699.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
37

"ACOG Publications." Obstetrics & Gynecology 144, no. 3 (2024): 431–32. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000005664.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
38

"ACOG Publications." Obstetrics & Gynecology 131, no. 1 (2018): 185–86. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000002448.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
39

"ACOG Publications." Obstetrics & Gynecology 131, no. 2 (2018): 405. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000002497.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
40

"ACOG Publications." Obstetrics & Gynecology 131, no. 3 (2018): 609–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000002524.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
41

"ACOG Publications." Obstetrics & Gynecology 131, no. 4 (2018): 751. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000002585.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
42

"ACOG Publications." Obstetrics & Gynecology 131, no. 5 (2018): 943–44. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000002625.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
43

"ACOG Publications." Obstetrics & Gynecology 131, no. 6 (2018): 1173. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000002673.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
44

"ACOG Publications." Obstetrics & Gynecology 132, no. 1 (2018): 241–42. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000002700.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
45

"ACOG Publications." Obstetrics & Gynecology 132, no. 2 (2018): 527–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000002767.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
46

"ACOG Publications." Obstetrics & Gynecology 132, no. 3 (2018): 793–94. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000002830.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
47

"ACOG publications." Obstetrics & Gynecology 132, no. 4 (2018): 1075–76. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000002889.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
48

"ACOG Publications." Obstetrics & Gynecology 132, no. 5 (2018): 1309–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000002944.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
49

"ACOG publications." Obstetrics & Gynecology 132, no. 6 (2018): 1513. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000002982.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
50

"ACOG Publications." Obstetrics & Gynecology 133, no. 1 (2019): 209–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aog.0000000000003027.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!