Academic literature on the topic 'Acta Eruditorum'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Acta Eruditorum.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Acta Eruditorum"

1

Lemley, Samuel V. "Printing Leibniz's Calculus: Dating and Numbering the Editions of the Nova Methodus pro Maximis et Minimis (October 1684)." Library 22, no. 2 (June 1, 2021): 177–96. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/library/22.2.177.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract The textual history of the first work on infinitesimal calculus and differentiation in print—Gottfried Wilhelm Leibniz’s ‘Nova methodus pro maximis et minimis …’ in the October 1684 instalment of the Leipzig scientific journal Acta Eruditorum—remains unstudied. Consequent to this inattention, extant copies of Leibniz’s article have been assigned to a single edition and a single press, despite evidence of substantive variation among them. This article examines the typographic and bibliographical evidence across multiple copies of the October 1684 instalment of the Acta to demonstrate that these extant copies in fact represent three separate editions printed on multiple presses over many years. This evidence, in turn, casts new light on both the complex printing history of the Acta Eruditorum in its first decade of publication (1682–93) and the distribution of learned periodicals in the seventeenth century.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Lamarra, Antonio, Catherine Fullarton, and Ursula Goldenbaum. "(English translation of) “Contexte génétique et première réception de la Monadologie. Leibniz, Wolff et la Doctrine de L’harmonie préétablie,”." Leibniz Review 29 (2019): 185–99. http://dx.doi.org/10.5840/leibniz20192916.

Full text
Abstract:
The many equivocations that, in several respects, characterised the reception of Leibniz's Principes de la Nature et de la Grâce and Monadologie, up until the last century, find their origins in the genetic circumstances of their manuscripts, which gave rise to misinformation published in an anonymous review that appeared in the Leipzig Acta eruditorum in 1721. Archival research demonstrates that the author of this review, as well as of the Latin review of the Monadologie, which appeared, the same year, in the Supplementa of the Acta eruditorum, was Christian Wolff, who possessed a copy of the Leibnizian manuscrip since at least 1717. This translation figured as a precise cultural strategy that aimed to defuse any idealist interpretation of Leibniz’s monadology. An essential part of this strategy consists in reading the theory of pre-established harmony as a doctrine founded on a strictly dualistic substance metaphysics.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Dourado, Thiago. "Cálculo Integral de Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz." Revista Brasileira de História da Matemática 22, no. 45 (September 6, 2022): 01–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.47976/rbhm2022v22n4501-20.

Full text
Abstract:
Neste trabalho apresentamos uma tradução do artigo “Sobre uma geometria altamente oculta e a análise dos indivisíveis e infinitos” de Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz, publicado na Acta Eruditorum, edição de junho de 1686 (número VI), tomado como o trabalho que fundou e aporesentou pela primeira vez o cálculo integral em bases gerais.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Dourado, Thiago Augusto Silva. "Cálculo Diferencial de Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz." Revista Brasileira de História da Matemática 22, no. 44 (May 20, 2022): 45–60. http://dx.doi.org/10.47976/rbhm2022v22n4445-60.

Full text
Abstract:
Neste trabalho apresentamos uma tradução do artigo “Novo método para máximos e mínimos, bem como para tangentes, que não se detém ante as quantidades fracionárias ou irracionais, e é um singular gênero do cálculo para estes problemas” de Gottfried Wilhelm von Leibniz, publicado na Acta Eruditorum, edição de outubro de 1684 (número X), tomado como o trabalho que fundou e aporesentou pela primeira vez o cálculo diferencial em bases gerais.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Gemert, Guillaume van. "Acta Semi-Eruditorum: de lotgevallen van een 'anti-tijdschrift'." Tijdschrift voor Tijdschriftstudies, no. 18 (December 1, 2005): 26. http://dx.doi.org/10.18352/ts.202.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Follesa, Laura. "A Comparison of Wolff’s and Kant’s Receptions of Emanuel Swedenborg." Kant-Studien 112, no. 1 (March 1, 2021): 1–22. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/kant-2021-0001.

Full text
Abstract:
Abstract Kant’s Dreams of a Spirit-Seer (1766) did not provide the sole perspective through which Emanuel Swedenborg’s work was known in Germany in the eighteenth century. Before Kant, another German philosopher was interested in Swedenborg from a completely different perspective: Christian Wolff. On the one hand, this paper analyzes the meaning of Wolff’s anonymous reviews of Swedenborg’s early writings published in Acta Eruditorum, the authorship of which was only recently discovered, in order to show Swedenborg’s intertwinement with German scholars during the 1720s. On the other, I juxtapose Kant’s and Wolff’s evaluations of Swedenborg’s work at the origins of their different attitudes towards fundamental problems such as the nature of the soul and immortality.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Recalde, Luis Cornelio, and Sara Marcela Henao. "Los obstáculos epistemológicos en el desarrollo histórico de las ecuaciones diferenciales ordinarias." Revista EIA 15, no. 29 (May 17, 2018): 59–70. http://dx.doi.org/10.24050/reia.v15i29.1140.

Full text
Abstract:
Los obstáculos epistemológicos en el desarrollo histórico de las ecuaciones diferenciales ordinariasResumenEl objetivo de este artículo es presentar algunas reflexiones, históricas y epistemológicas, que emergen como resultado de una investigación desarrollada en torno a la constitución histórica de las ecuaciones diferenciales ordinarias. Se tomaron como unidades de análisis, resultados publicados en el volumen 22 de Opera Omnia y en Acta Eruditorum, entre finales del siglo XVII y mediados del siglo XVIII. Se muestra que las ecuaciones diferenciales ordinarias surgen como producto de dos eventos; el primero vinculado con algunos problemas de la física que se modelaron mediante ecuaciones diferenciales ordinarias, y el segundo relacionado con los diversos métodos analíticos provenientes del cálculo. El análisis histórico realizado, permitió identificar algunos obstáculos epistemológicos, los cuales se tomaron como referencia para concluir con una reflexión didáctica.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Kinukawa, T. "Natural history as entrepreneurship: Maria Sibylla Merian's correspondence with J. G. Volkamer II and James Petiver." Archives of Natural History 38, no. 2 (October 2011): 313–27. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/anh.2011.0037.

Full text
Abstract:
The artist, naturalist and entrepreneur Maria Sibylla Merian (1647–1717) constructed her network by exchanging natural history specimens with other naturalists in Europe, created a market for her publication Metamorphosis insectorum Surinamensium (1705), and had her book reviewed in major literary journals in northwestern Europe. Two collections of letters provide information on this process: those exchanged between James Petiver (1664–1718) and his correspondents in Amsterdam and those between the German physician and botanist J. G. Volkamer II (1662–1744) and his friends in Amsterdam. Merian's strategies demonstrate that patronage played a limited role in her success as naturalist, while her skill as an entrepreneur provided a chance to engage in communication with other naturalists and have other naturalists receive her work positively. Merian's work epitomizes the growing role played by entrepreneur-naturalists in the accumulation of knowledge about the natural resources of overseas colonies and the distribution of this knowledge to European readers. Although her gender prevented her from obtaining membership of academies, Merian's book was reviewed by major European literary journals, including Acta eruditorum in Leipzig. The article analyses her letters in the context of larger networks of correspondence between Holland, England and Germany.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Mayer, Uwe. "Kein tummelplatz, darauff gelehrte leut Kugeln wechseln. Principles and Practice of Mencke’s Editorship of the Acta eruditorum in the Light of Mathematical Controversies." Archives Internationales d'Histoire des Sciences 63, no. 170-171 (June 2013): 49–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.1484/j.arihs.5.103834.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

KNOBLOCH, EBERHARD. "G. W. LEIBNIZ, La naissance du calcul diffrentiel, 26 articles des Acta Eruditorum,introduction, traduction et notes par Marc Parmentier. Paris, 1989. 180 FF." Nuncius 6, no. 1 (1991): 226–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/182539191x00245.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Acta Eruditorum"

1

Laeven, Hubert, and Lucy Laeven-Aretz. "The authors and reviewers of the Acta Eruditorum 1682 – 1735." Universitätsbibliothek Leipzig, 2014. http://nbn-resolving.de/urn:nbn:de:bsz:15-qucosa-138484.

Full text
Abstract:
For reasons of editorial policy the contributions to the Acta Eruditorum (Leipzig 1682-1731) and its successor, the Nova Acta Eruditorum (Leipzig 1731-1772), were published anonymously. However, a lot of volumes of the copies of these journals in the UB Leipzig, the SLUB Dresden, the SUB Göttingen and the UB Heidelberg are provided with handwritten marginal notes, originating from the editors. With the help of these, it was possible to identify, to a very large extent, the vast number of contributors from all corners of the international Republic of Letters for the period 1682-1735. So, the present publication may add to the history of the Acta Eruditorum as such, and to that of learned journalism, more in general. Furthermore it might contribute in some respects to the intellectual history of the Republic of Letters, and in particular to that of Saxony and the University of Leipzig. And last, but not least, it may add valuable information to the biographies and bibliographies of the scholars involved in the work of the Acta Eruditorum
Aus Gründen der Redaktionspolitik wurden die Beiträge der Acta Eruditorum (Leipzig 1682-1731) und deren Fortsetzung, die Nova Acta Eruditorum (1732-1772), anonym veröffentlicht. Eine Menge Bände der Exemplare dieser Zeitschriften in der UB Leipzig, der SLUB Dresden, der SUB Göttingen und der UB Heidelberg sind aber mit handschriftlichen Eintragungen aus dem Kreis der Herausgeber versehen. Mit Hilfe dieser Randnotizen war es möglich die grosse Schar der Kontribuenten aus allen Ecken der internationalen Gelehrtenrepublik für die Jahre 1682-1735 fast vollständig zu identifizieren. Damit erweitert diese Veröffentlichung die bisherigen Kenntnisse der Geschichte der Acta Eruditorum und die des gelehrten Journalismus mehr im allgemeinen. Weiterhin kann sie in einigen Hinsichten beitragen zu der intellektuellen Geschichte der internationalen Gelehrtenrepublik, und Sachsens und der Universität Leipzig ins besondere. Und nicht zuletzt enthält sie wertvolle Erweiterungen zu den Biographien und Bibliographien der Gelehrten die an der Arbeit der Acta Eruditorum beteiligt waren
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Parmentier, Marc. "Traduction commentée des opuscules mathématiques publiés par Leibniz dans les "Acta eruditorum"." Paris 1, 1987. http://www.theses.fr/1987PA010587.

Full text
Abstract:
Traduction commentee des opuscules mathematiques publies par deibniz dans les acta eruditorum. Marc parmentier, sous la direction de m. Serres. Cette traduction regroupe 27 articles exposant les principes et les developpements du calcul infinitesimal, publies par leibniz entre 1682 et 1713 dans la revue savante qu'il a contribue a creer a leipzig. Le commentaire s'attache a en degager les mecanismes de l'ars inveniendi leibnizien. Les decouvertes de leibniz ne sont pas en effet le resultat d'une methode prealable a vocation universelle et integralement rationnelle; tout au contraire les principes methodiques apparaissent toujours intriques au sein de leur mise en oeuvre effective. La grande decouverte que constitue le calcul infinitesimal, la seule partie de son oeuvre mathematique que leibniz ait decide de livrer au monde savant, est le fruit de son "optimisme mathematique", c'est-a-dire d'une confiance a priori dans l'efficacite des regles du calcul analytique et des analogies heuristiques. Mais l'originalite de leibniz est de deduire de ce processus les regles d'une methode d'inventer. De ce point de vue, la question du fondement logique de son calcul n'apparait pas a leibniz comme une condition de ses progres ulterieurs. Leibniz se contente de proposer, selon les circonstances, plusieurs interpretations de son calcul, dans un but surtout pedagogique, pour hater son adoption par d'autres savants. Le commentaire s'efforce egalement de situer l'invention leibnizienne par rapport aux possibilites objectives offertes par l'epoque, et aux travaux d'autres geometres qui en adopterent les principes : les freres bernouilli, le marquis de l'hopital. Les progres du calcul furent en grande partie la consequence des problemes lances de geometre a geometre. Il est donc le fruit d'une reelle collaboration. Ce phenomene est nouveau dans l'histoire des sciences, gouvernee jusque la par le primat de la vanite personnelle. Leibniz ne manque pas d'en prendre acte et de souligner. La necessite de considerer desormais la science comme une entreprise collective.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Parmentier, Marc. "Traduction commentée des opuscules mathématiques publiés par Leibniz dans les "Acta eruditorum"." Lille 3 : ANRT, 1988. http://catalogue.bnf.fr/ark:/12148/cb37608719n.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic "Acta Eruditorum"

1

Indici degli Acta Eruditorum Lipsiensium (1693-1733). Napoli: Liguori, 2016.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

H, Laeven A., Laeven-Aretz Lucy J. M, and Ecole Jean, eds. Sämtliche Rezensionen in den Acta Eruditorum (1705-1731). Hildesheim: G. Olms, 2001.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

De " Acta eruditorum" onder redactie van Otto Mencke (1644-1707): De geschiedenis van een internationaal geleerdenperiodiek tussen 1682 en 1707. Amsterdam: APA-Holland University Press, 1986.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Laeven, A. H. The " Acta eruditorum" under the editorship of Otto Mencke (1644-1707): The history of an international learned journal between 1682 and 1707. Amsterdam: APA-Holland University Press, 1990.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Gershom Carmichael's supplements and appendix to Samuel Pufendorf's De officio hominis et civis juxta legem naturalem libri duo, as well as the introduction to the 1769 edition and the 1727 Acta eruditorum review of Carmichael's notes. Cleveland, Ohio: J.N. Lenhart, 1985.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Acta Eruditorum. Creative Media Partners, LLC, 2015.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Beowulf. Acta Eruditorum. Creative Media Partners, LLC, 2018.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Anonyma. Acta Eruditorum: Anno ... Publicata. Arkose Press, 2015.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Anonyma. Acta Eruditorum: Anno ... Publicata. Arkose Press, 2015.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Anonyma. Acta Eruditorum: Anno ... Publicata. Arkose Press, 2015.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Book chapters on the topic "Acta Eruditorum"

1

Pietschmann, Klaus. "3.4 Musikgeschichtsschreibung im italienisch-deutschen Wissenstransfer um 1700. Andrea Bontempis „Historia musica“ (Perugia 1695) und ihre Rezension in den „Acta eruditorum“ (Leipzig 1696)." In Praktiken der Frühen Neuzeit, 163–73. Köln: Böhlau Verlag, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.7788/9783412502591-012.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

"Acta eruditorum." In Encyclopedia of the Scientific Revolution, 73–74. Routledge, 2003. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780203801864-12.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

McDonough, Jeffrey K. "Vis viva and the Origins of Leibniz’s Natural Philosophy." In A Miracle Creed, 100–132. Oxford University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197629079.003.0004.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter takes up Leibniz’s famous defense of the conservation of vis viva as announced in his A Brief Demonstration of a Notable Error of Descartes and Others Concerning a Natural Law, published in the Acta Eruditorum in 1686. It argues that Leibniz’s mature understanding of the laws of nature is best understood—both historically and conceptually—as arising not out of his work in dynamics, but rather out of his optimality approach to the laws of optics. The upshot of the chapter is that Leibniz’s mature natural philosophy should be understood as being initially driven not by his discoveries in dynamics, but rather by his studies in optics and his embrace of the Principle of Optimality.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

McDonough, Jeffrey K. "Optics and Immanent Lawful Teleology." In A Miracle Creed, 8–59. Oxford University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197629079.003.0002.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter begins with a discussion of Leibniz’s seminal Unitary Principle of Optics, Catoptrics and Dioptrics, published in 1682 in the Acta Eruditorum. In that piece, Leibniz shows how the central laws of geometrical optics—the laws of reflection and refraction—can be derived from an optimality principle according to which light takes the easiest path between its starting and ending points. After sketching the historical and technical context of Leibniz’s discoveries in optics, the chapter goes on to explore the implications of Leibniz’s discoveries for his views on teleology. It argues that Leibniz’s immanent lawful teleology presents a formidable challenge even to contemporary philosophers, many of whom are understandably reluctant to allow genuine teleological explanations at the level of fundamental physics.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

McDonough, Jeffrey K. "Rigid Beams and the Foundations of Physics." In A Miracle Creed, 60–99. Oxford University Press, 2022. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197629079.003.0003.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter explores Leibniz’s ingenious treatment of the breaking strength of rigid bodies. In 1684, in a seminal paper published in the Acta Eruditorum, Leibniz offered a model of the behavior of rigid bodies that crucially takes it for granted that rigid beams must satisfy his Principle of Optimality. In doing so, he successfully arrived at an improved formula for calculating the strength of a cubic beam. Beyond its scientific results, however, Leibniz’s approach to the problem of determining the breaking strength of rigid beams had profound implications for the structure and nature of matter itself. This chapter draws out the implications of Leibniz’s account for his views on the nature of forces and material bodies. It concludes by considering the implications of Leibniz’s thinking about forces and bodies for his understanding of the relationship between monads and space.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography