Academic literature on the topic 'Actio iniuriarum'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Actio iniuriarum.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Actio iniuriarum"
1
Wallinga, Tammo. "Schmerzensgeld und actio iniuriarum aestimatoria." Tijdschrift voor rechtsgeschiedenis 83, no. 1-2 (May 31, 2015): 226–47. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/15718190-08312p11.
Full textAbstract:
Compensation for non-pecuniary loss and the actio aestimatoria, The case of Van Kreuningen/Bessem. – In the case Van Kreuningen/Bessem of 1943, the Roman actio iniuriarum (aestimatoria) was used as an argument in favour of granting compensation for non-pecuniary loss. This is surprising for a number of reasons, not least because it was a penal action. In this article, the action and its value as an argument is studied in the wider context of the history of compensation for pain, suffering and disfigurement in Dutch law before and after the codification of 1838.
2
Neethling, J. "Regspraak: The availability of the actio legis aquiliae and the actio iniuriarum between spouses." Tydskrif vir die Suid-Afrikaanse Reg 2021, no. 3 (2021): 602–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.47348/tsar/2021/i3a10.
Full textAbstract:
Daar is geen klinkklare antwoord in die Suid-Afrikaanse reg op die vraag of gades mekaar met die actio legis Aquiliae en die actio iniuriarum kan aanspreek nie. Vir doeleindes hiervan word onderskei tussen huwelike buite en binne gemeenskap van goed. Net eersgenoemde is hier van direkte belang en die positiefregtelike posisie sien soos volg daaruit: ’n Gade getroud buite gemeenskap van goed mag in beginsel stante matrimonio vrylik enige van dié twee deliksaksies teen die ander gade instel. In TG v WC was die partye, getroud buite gemeenskap van goed, besig om te skei. Hulle is getroud na ’n verhouding waarin die verweerder te kenne gegee het dat hy die eiseres lief het en altyd saam met haar wil wees. Kort na huweliksluiting het hul verhouding egter verbrokkel toe die verweerder haar begin verneder en gevra het om die huis te verlaat. Die eiseres het toe uitgevind dat op die tydstip wat die verweerder haar gevra het om te trou, hy reeds gemeen het dat hul verhouding onherstelbaar verbrokkel het, maar dit nie vir haar gesê het nie. Sodoende het hy haar deur sy bedrieglike wanvoorstelling beweeg om die huwelik te sluit. Gebaseer op dié feite, het die eiseres die verweerder op twee skuldoorsake aangespreek; eerstens die Aquiliese aksie om skadevergoeding te eis vir die suiwer ekonomiese verlies wat sy gely het (haar onkoste weens die huwelik) as gevolg van die verweerder se opsetlike wanvoorstelling; en tweedens die actio iniuriarum om solatium te verhaal weens die aantasting van haar eer en goeie naam. Die verweerder teken eksepsie teen beide eise aan op grond daarvan dat geeneen ’n skuldoorsaak daarstel nie. Die hof beslis dat die eiseres se eerste eis nie gedingsvatbaar is nie omdat dit strydig met openbare en regsbeleid sou wees. Ten onregte. Dit is gevestigde reg dat ’n opsetlike wanvoorstelling wat tot kontraksluiting lei, contra bonos mores en bygevolg onregmatig is en daarom ’n deliktuele skuldoorsaak uitmaak. Die hof moes dus die eksepsie teen hierdie eis van die hand gewys het. Daarenteen het die hof tereg bevestig, soos deesdae algemeen aanvaar word, dat die actio iniuriarum tot die beskikking van gades getroud buite gemeenskap van goed is en dat daar dus geen hindernis vir ’n vrou is om haar man weens iniuria aan te spreek nie. Die eksepsie teen hierdie eis word dus tereg afgewys.
3
Sitek, Bronisław. "‘REMOTIO AB ORDINEM’ WYDALENIE DEKURIONA (RADNEGO) Z ‘ORDO DECURIONUM’ (RADY MIASTA)." Zeszyty Prawnicze 11, no. 1 (December 21, 2016): 249. http://dx.doi.org/10.21697/zp.2011.11.1.14.
Full textAbstract:
‘REMOTIO AB ORDINEM’. COUNCILLORS’ (‘DECURIO’) EXPULSION FROM THE CITY COUNCIL (‘ORDO DECURIONUM’) Summary In the light of the Polish law every citizen who has all civil rights can perform a function of a councillor. Polish legislation, with the exception of the requirement of age, does not introduce any further formal requirements for candidates for that office. A councillor needs not to have any professional or moral qualifications. Although there are codes of councillors’ conduct which relate to such values as honesty and integrity, however they do not introduce any sanctions for their violation. Source analysis shows that in the Roman law the major causes of expulsion from the city council include: conducting an immoral life, performing an infamous profession (actual infamy), conviction on the basis of a disgracing civil action (iudicia privata) or a disgracing public action (iudicia publica) and criminal expulsion from the army (missio ignominiosa). To the professions causing infamy were also included such professions as gladiator, actor, herald, gravedigger, or guardian in a theatre. Civil actions disgracing lost party were: fiduciae actio pro socio, actio tutelae, actio mandati. To the disgracing civil actions, but with the tort nature, were also included actio porter, actio iniuriarum and actio lot. Sentencing in the public was always associated with an additional penalty that generated discredit on the honour, or to infamy. The same was in the case of criminal deportation from the army.
4
Brown, Jonathan. "‘Revenge porn’ and the actio iniuriarum: using ‘old law’ to solve ‘new problems’." Legal Studies 38, no. 3 (July 5, 2018): 396–410. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/lst.2018.8.
Full textAbstract:
Abstract‘Revenge porn’ is conceptualised as a modern phenomenon which the law is not equipped to deal with. The advent of smartphone technology has allowed sexually explicit material to be created easily and disseminated quickly. An increasing number of individuals have fallen victim to this phenomenon in recent years. This paper submits that victims of revenge porn ought to be held due monetary redress in the civil law, while acknowledging that the damage done by revenge porn need not necessarily involve a loss. Victims of revenge porn are likely to suffer from severe emotional distress and upset, but these injuries are non-patrimonial. This can consequently make it difficult to frame an action for damages. This paper asks if the delict iniuria might offer appropriate remedy in instances of revenge porn. The actio iniuriarum was, in Roman law, a delict which served to protect the non-patrimonial aspects of a person's existence – ‘who a person is rather than what a person has’. As the propagation of sexually explicit images of an individual without their consent is clearly an affront to the esteem of that individual, it is argued that instances of revenge porn ought to be considered actionable as iniuria in modern Scottish law.
5
BROWN, JONATHAN. "Dignity, Body Parts, and the Actio Iniuriarum: A Novel Solution to a Common (Law) Problem?" Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics 28, no. 3 (July 2019): 522–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0963180119000446.
Full text
6
Kamińska, Renata. "SWOBODA KORZYSTANIA Z MIEJSC PUBLICZNYCH NA PRZYKŁADZIE MORZA I WYBRZEŻA MORSKIEGO." Zeszyty Prawnicze 14, no. 2 (December 7, 2016): 63. http://dx.doi.org/10.21697/zp.2014.14.2.04.
Full textAbstract:
FREEDOM TO USE PUBLIC PLACES AS EXEMPLIFIED BY THE USE OF THE SEA AND SEASHORESummaryIn Roman law the sea and its shore were considered res communes omnium, common property. This classification gave rise to two important consequences. Firstly, everyone was granted the right to their free access and use, viz. fishing, hauling fishing nets in, mooring boats were all permitted in such places. Furthermore, it was also admissible to build a cottage or an adobe on the coast, and to acquire property rights to it. The second consequence of the recognition of the sea and shore as res communes omnium was that any interested party could be granted legal protection if his entitlements within this scope were violated. One of the legal measures available was actio iniuriarum, alongside injunctions. Protection by injunction was also provided forthe sea itself and the shore as such.
7
Balthasar, Stephan. "Truth and secret: the protection of privacy in ancient German, French and English law." Tijdschrift voor Rechtsgeschiedenis / Revue d'Histoire du Droit / The Legal History Review 74, no. 3-4 (2006): 337–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.1163/157181906778946074.
Full textAbstract:
AbstractComparing the legal development in France, Germany and England from 1500–1800, this article analyses the protection of those interests which are covered today by the law of privacy. Continental law, influenced by the Roman actio iniuriarum, protected personal secrets, and it also restrained, to a certain extent, the divulgation of embarrassing truths. The English law of defamation however, afforded no comparable protection, the proof of truth ("justification") being a perfect defence against any claim for damages under the head of defamation. The conclusion that the civil law has a long tradition of preserving sensitive information against unwanted publicity is underlined by the fact that the ancient ideas of protecting secrets and restricting publication of the truth helped 19th century lawyers in France and in Germany to approach the modern concept of privacy ("vie privée", "Privatleben").
8
Nowicka, Dobromiła. "Iniuria Suffered by a Slave?" Studia Iuridica Lublinensia 29, no. 5 (December 31, 2020): 233. http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/sil.2020.29.5.233-247.
Full textAbstract:
<p>The dissonance between the perception of <em>edictum de iniuriis quae servis fiunt</em> on Ulpian’s and Gaius’ part is so significant that it can lead to a conclusion that a deed done to a slave – even if not always, what seems the most probable, certainly in most cases – qualified only as an insult harming the slave’s owner, whereas a would-be <em>actio</em> <em>servi</em> <em>nomine</em> was <em>de facto</em> not in use. As an infringement of a slave could additionally give rise to an owner’s entitlement to plead for damages according to the Aquilian regime, it seems that practical use of the edictal clause with regard to <em>actio</em> <em>servi</em> <em>nomine</em>, even if possible to take place at a certain level of legal development of the delict, was of minor importance. However, recognizing the main role of the edict in providing a modern and flexible basis for bringing praetorial <em>actio</em> <em>iniuriarum</em> <em>suo</em> <em>nomine</em> in a case of <em>iniuria</em> suffered through one’s slave, not limited to decemviral instances of <em>os fractum</em> and <em>membrum ruptum</em>, appears to be the most probable interpretation.</p>
9
Visser, CJ. "The Doctrine of Subjective Rights, the Actio Iniuriarum and the Constitution: A Convergent Doctrinal Basis for the Law of Personality." Stellenbosch Law Review 2021, no. 2 (2021): 272–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.47348/slr/2021/i2a5.
Full textAbstract:
This article revisits the doctrinal basis of the positive law in protecting the human personality as a legal interest given the approach adopted by the judiciary. In terms of this approach, based on common law and constitutional considerations, the human personality is not articulated as a composite interest (ie the human personality is not doctrinally conceptualised as consisting of various discrete personality rights). Arguably, such an approach denigrates the traditional view that the human personality ought to be protected as a composite interest in law. Therefore, this article interrogates more carefully the doctrinal basis of the law of personality from the perspective of the common law and the Constitution in the light of the controversial nature of the judiciary’s recent approach. In this regard, the article finds that there is an overlap, or more specifically a convergence, between common-law personality rights (as premised on the doctrine of subjective rights and the actio iniuriarum) and fundamental constitutional rights regarding the human personality. The article demonstrates that in terms of scope (ie the various personality interests recognised in positive law) and framework (ie the differentiation and adjudication of the different personality interests in positive law), both the common law and the Constitution attest to the composite nature of the human personality as a legal interest. On this basis, I argue that such convergence enables the creation of a single and integrated doctrinal basis for the post-constitutional operation of the human personality as a legal interest. It is further argued that such a single and integrated doctrinal basis provides the foundation for the further constitutionalisation of the law of personality in terms of a transformative constitutionalism paradigm and the horizontal application of the Constitution.
10
Neethling, Johan. "Helge Walter, ACTIO INIURIARUM: DER SCHUTZ DER PERSÖNLICHKEIT IM SÜDAFRIKANISCHEN PRIVATRECHT Berlin: Duncker and Humblot, 1996. Schriften zur Europaischen Rechts- und Verfassungsgeschichte, Band 17. 229 pp. ISBN 3 428 08872 7. DM 84.00." Edinburgh Law Review 1, no. 4 (September 1997): 506–9. http://dx.doi.org/10.3366/elr.1997.1.4.506.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Actio iniuriarum"
1
Balthasar, Stephan. "Wahrheit und Geheimnis im Zivilrecht : Der Schutz der Privatsphäre in Frankreich, Deutschland und England." Université Robert Schuman (Strasbourg) (1971-2008), 2005. http://www.theses.fr/2005STR30001.
Full textAbstract:
Cette thèse analyse la protection de la vie privée en France, en Angleterre et en Allemagne. Dans une pre-mière partie, elle aborde ce problème d'un point de vue historique. Elle démontre notamment, comment le droit commun (ius commune) protégeait la vie privée en s'appuyant sur l'" actio iniuriarum ". Dans une deuxième partie, cette thèse traite du droit moderne, c'est-à-dire des codifications de droit civil en France et en Allemagne mais aussi, pour le droit anglais, des décisions récentes comme Campell v. MGN ([2004] UKHL 22). Malgré des différences initialement très nettes, le droit français, le droit anglais et le droit alle-mand ont aujourd'hui beaucoup de points communsThis joint PhD thesis analyses the protection of privacy in England, France and Germany. Its first part focuses on the historical development, espacially on the continentalius commune where the actio iniuriarum offered a certain protection of secrecy and privacy. The second part describes the modern law of privacy, taking into account the recent development in England after the coming into force of Human rights act 1998 and considering recent decisions such as Campbell v. MGN ([2004] UKHL 22). Whereas the historical differences between the three countries seem rather substancial, nowadays, the three legal systems adopt very similar solutions to the problem of protecting privacy
2
CHEN, HAN. "Fatti ingiusti contro la persona nella prospettiva storico-comparativa: alcuni spunti di riflessione per diritto cinese." Doctoral thesis, Università degli Studi di Roma "Tor Vergata", 2009. http://hdl.handle.net/2108/751.
Full textAbstract:
La ricerca è divisa in tre capitoli. Il primo capitolo riguarda il tema dei fatti ingiusti contro la persona nel diritto
romano. Si tratta di quattro argomenti: la disciplina decemvirale, l’actio iniuriarum, il damnum sorta nell’ambito
della lex Aquila, e la pena privata. Con questo capitolo si spiega l’evoluzione della responsabilità extracontrattuale e
la bipartizione tra danno e offesa. Il secondo capitolo è concentrato nell’art. 2059 c.c.. Qui si spiega come è
formulato storicamente tale articolo e come è stata superata la limitazione della riparazione al danno non
patrimoniale. Con il danno biologico e il danno esistenziale, il diritto italiano segna un’espansione del concetto di
danno non patrimoniale. Il terzo capitolo parla del diritto tradizionale cinese. Influenzata dal diritto sovietico, la
legge sui principi generali del diritto civile del 1987 non ha una posizione chiara sulla riparabilità al danno morale.
Con gli interventi della Corte Suprema e con la promulgazione di nuove leggi di settore, il danno morale è
finalmente stato accettato dal diritto cinese. Nel corso della elaborazione di una legge sulla responsabilità sono sorti
molti dibattiti: uno più discusso è la personalizzazione nella liquidazione del danno alla persona. Con una
prospettiva storico-comparatistica, la tutela della persona nell’ambito della responsabilità extracontrattuale segna
un’espansione dei valori meritevoli di tutela. Questo richiede anche un sistema aperto della responsabilità
extracontrattuale.The research is divided into three chapters. The first chapter concerns the Personal Injury in Roman law. There are four topics: discipline decemvirale, l’actio iniuriarum, damnum of the lex Aquila, and the private penalty. in this chapter which explains the evolution of the civil liability and the bi-partition of damage and offense in the roman law. The second chapter is concentrated on art. 2059 c.c. which can be explained as a limitation of reparation to nonpecuniary damage. With the danno biologico (biological damage) and danno esistenziale (the damage existential), the Italian law marks an expansion of the concept of non-pecuniary damage. The third chapter concerns the Chinese law which starts from traditional Chinese law. Influenced by Soviet law, the general principles of civil law of 1987 does not have a clear position on the question of repairing the moral damage. With the interpretations provided by the Supreme Court and the new laws of sectors, the concept of moral damage is finally accepted by Chinese law. In the course of drawing up a law on civil liability, many debates have been arisen: one of the most discussed is the customization in the liquidation of personal damages. With a historical- comparatistica perspective, the protection of person marks an expansion of values worthy of protection. This also requires an open system of non-contractual liability.
Books on the topic "Actio iniuriarum"
1
Walter, Helge. Actio Iniuriarum: Der Schutz der Persönlichkeit Im Südafrikanischen Privatrecht. Duncker & Humblot GmbH, 1996.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Actio iniuriarum"
1
Zimmermann, Reinhard. "Actio iniuriarum." In The Law of ObligationsRoman Foundations of the Civilian Tradition, 1050–94. Oxford University Press, 1996. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198764267.003.0031.
Full text
2
"23 Liability for Insulting Behaviour: The Actio Iniuriarum." In Roman Law for Scots Law Students, 405–16. Edinburgh University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9781474450201-029.
Full text
3
Jansen, Nils, and Sandy Steel. "Steps towards a Modern Tort Law." In The Structure of Tort Law, 270–88. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198705055.003.0007.
Full textAbstract:
This chapter assesses how the gemeines Recht tort law system displays extensive similarities to the ancient Roman law, but seems to have little connection to the modern law. The most important of the original Roman law claims were the actio iniuriarum and the actio de dolo, which provided some protection against immoral infliction of economic loss; however, special actions, such as the actio de deictis vel effusis and the actio de pauperie, continued to exist for particular cases of property damage or bodily injury. In legal experience, the shift in understanding of tort law has not been limited to a few exceptional liability rules; it is really a shift which has also occurred within the traditional law of delict. The latter is also generally understood today to be part of a compensatory tort law which, as a whole, is geared towards fair distribution of protected positions and risks of loss between potential injurers and victims. It would be surprising if this development were not accompanied by difficulties within the doctrinal system, as it must ultimately lead to a decoupling of the law of delict from actual duties of conduct, with the result that the injurer's duty to insure could be a liability-grounding argument just as much as a victim's failure to do so could be a reason for denying their claim.