Academic literature on the topic 'Administrative judge's office'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Administrative judge's office.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Administrative judge's office"
1
Mbang Essono, Désiré Aurèle. "The Judge and The Right of Preemption Land in Cameroon." African Journal of Law, Political Research and Administration 4, no. 1 (May 14, 2021): 52–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.52589/ajlpra-i8wuour1.
Full textAbstract:
The action of the Cameroonian judge in the context of the preservation of land ownership faced with the right of pre-emption remains very marginal. On the other hand, thanks to the increase in its field of competence, the administrative judge has been erected as a full-fledged protector of the property of private persons subject to pre-emption. Through his action, the administrative judge should ensure that land pre-emption operations comply with the law. In the event of non-compliance with legality, the respondent could be held liable. Moreover, the Cameroonian legal system reserves a traditional place for the judicial judge in the protection of pre-empted land ownership, as he contributes through his office to counter any infringement of land ownership. The judicial judge's field of competence could have been broadened with the possibility of carrying out legality control of land pre-emption operations, but this attribution of competence remains very clearly defined.
2
Monicadia, Monicadia, Azmi Fendri, and Khairani Khairani. "Juridical Analysis of the Legal Results of the Binding Agreement of Sale and Purchase with a Deed under the Hand Endorsed by a Notary after the Judge's Decision Number 54 /PDT.G/2014/PN.PDG." International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding 6, no. 5 (October 16, 2019): 231. http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v6i5.1091.
Full textAbstract:
Notary is authorized to authorize the letter under hand (legalization). The legalization process is a letter made under the hand signed by the parties before the Notary and the notary register the deed into a special book, for example a binding sale and purchase agreement. The author is interested in discuss1) What is behind the occurrence of the case Decision Number 54 /Pdt.G/2014/PN.Pdg? 2)How the judge's consideration of the sale and purchase agreement binding made and approved by the notary in the case Decision Number 54 /Pdt.G/2014 /PN.Pdg? The research method used is the method of juridical normative empirical approach. The result of the research 1) The background of the occurrence of the Decision Number 54 /Pdt.G/2014/PN.Pdg is that Defendant I did not carry out the payment of the Plaintiff's land sale and purchase of the above land, both the second term and the third termin payment, causing such a large loss Plaintiffs, such losses include the Plaintiff can not utilize the land sale money optimally, the Plaintiff has sought constantly to pursue the path of peace to find a way of settlement but Defendant I always tried to dodge so as not to meet common ground, 2) Judge's consideration of the binding agreement Sale and purchase made and approved by a notary in the case of Decision Number 54 /Pdt.G/2014/PN.Pdg is the object of PPJB is a plot of land that has been certified shall be held a local examination by the Assembly, the TRTB Service does not issue permits for the location of housing on land SHM .No.4065 / Balai Gadang with the reason that evidently the land is located just above the ground which is the plan of the road or in the area of the eastern ring road of the city of Padang. This is contrary to the IPPT issued by the Land Office of Padang City and the Sale and Purchase of Land of SHM.No.4065 / Balai Gadang has been declared void in accordance with the provisions of Article 5 of the Agreement dated September 13, 2013, that both parties agree to the costs incurred in The process of reversing the name of the land certificate either on a Notary which makes the deed or administrative process in the Land Affairs office of Padang city. Therefore, please punish the plaintiff for reconstruction and defendant to pay as much (50% each) the costs incurred in the process behind the name SHM.No.4065 / Balai Gadang.
3
Schmidt, Georg. "Die richterliche Unabhängigkeit – Eine Bestandsaufnahme." Die Verwaltung 51, no. 2 (April 1, 2018): 227–63. http://dx.doi.org/10.3790/verw.51.2.227.
Full textAbstract:
Summary Regarding recent developments in Europe, the constitutional basis and scope of judicial independence is a salient question of the architecture of the judicial power in Germany, too. This article argues that judicial independence is not a personal privilege of judges but a functional requirement, which enables the judicial branch to exert its powers effectively. The analysis illustrates how judicial independence is protected as well substantively as procedurally under German legislation, which fills out the constitutional guarantee of the independence of the judges. Albeit a judge is under no obligation to follow instructions of a superior officer with regard to his or her legal findings, there are legitimate instruments of the court administration outside the centre of adjudication to secure good behaviour of the judges in office.
4
Орлова, М. І. "THE QUESTION OF THE PROCEDURAL ORDER OF APPLICATION OF THE TEMPORARY SUSPENSION OF JUDGES FROM JUSTICE." Juridical science, no. 1(103) (February 19, 2020): 309–15. http://dx.doi.org/10.32844/2222-5374-2020-103-1.37.
Full textAbstract:
The temporary removal of a judge from the administration of justice is a relatively new measure to ensure criminal proceedings in criminal procedural law and is carried out by the High Council of Justice. At the same time, as evidenced by the practice of its implementation, there are certain issues that necessitate their study and discussion. Therefore, the procedure of temporary suspension of a judge from the administration of justice is characterized by features that are due to the special legal status of judges. It is the need to ensure the independence of judges that provides for a special procedure for their removal. At the same time, the temporary removal of a judge is a measure that involves the removal from justice of judges in respect of whom there are reasonable doubts about their suitability for office, high rank of judge, to confirm or deny the relevant information. This is necessary to maintain confidence in the judiciary as a whole. The purpose of the article is to study the procedural procedure for the application of temporary suspension of a judge from the administration of justice. The article examines the procedural procedure for the application of temporary suspension of a judge from the administration of justice. It is emphasized that the institution of temporary suspension of judges exists for the timely suspension of a judge. The peculiarities of the procedural order of application of temporary suspension of a judge from the administration of justice have been determined. It is concluded that based on the results of the consideration of the petition, the High Council of Justice may make the following decisions: on the temporary suspension of a judge from the administration of justice in connection with criminal prosecution or on the denial of such a petition. It was found that the suspension did not restrict access to the court premises, as well as to the materials of previously distributed cases. Therefore, if a judge is removed without a precautionary measure in the form of round-the-clock house arrest / detention, the court will continue to go to work. A judge may also continue to perform administrative functions as chairman of the court or judgespeaker. Continue lecturing at the School of Judges, or continue to take bribes.
5
Dubov, Gennadii, and Bohdan Bondarenko. "TERMINATION OF POWERS OF A JUDGE OF THE CONSTITUTIONAL COURT OF UKRAINE AS A COMPONENT OF THE MECHANISM TO ENSURE ITS INDEPENDENCE." Journal of International Legal Communication 1 (June 29, 2021): 55–72. http://dx.doi.org/10.32612/uw.27201643.2021.1.pp.55-72.
Full textAbstract:
The article is devoted to the study of the grounds and procedure for termination of a judge's powers of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine as a constituent of ensuring its independence. The article aims to establish the reasons for the insufficient level of ensuring the independence of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine in terms of failure to comply with the current legislation on termination of powers of judges of the Constitutional Court and suggest recommendations to overcome defined problems. A set of methods was used for the study, such as: 1) a formal legal analysis of the texts of regulatory legal acts; 2) the historical and historical-legal analysis actualized and compared problems related to the independence of judges of the Constitutional Court during the events of 2008, 2010, 2014, and 2020-2021; 3) the comparative-legal method was used to compare the legal regulation of constitutional review bodies in several post-Soviet states with the transitional nature of legal and public administration systems; 4) the formal and dogmatic method allowed us to conclude the content of legal regulation for termination of powers of a judge of the Constitutional Court and changes in such regulation underwent during the existence of constitutional jurisdiction in Ukraine; 5) the systematic method defined the forms of interaction between legal institutions, in particular, the institution of removal from office in criminal proceedings and the institution of independence of judges of the Constitutional Court. As a research result, we described the key problems in the practice of termination of powers of judges of the Constitutional Court of Ukraine and suggested recommendations to solve defined problems. The value of this article, first of all, is due to the study of events in the Constitutional Court during 2008, 2010, 2014, and 2020-2021.
6
Aspani, Budi. "EKSISTENSI PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA DALAM PENYELENGGARAAN PEMERINTAHAN." Solusi 17, no. 2 (May 1, 2019): 114–21. http://dx.doi.org/10.36546/solusi.v17i2.172.
Full textAbstract:
Legal protection of citizens for acts committed by the authorities can be done through 3 (three) bodies, namely the State Administration Agency, through administrative efforts, the State Administrative Court, based on Undag - Law Number 5 of 1986, General Judiciary, through Article 1365 of the Civil Code. In an effort to approach the main problem in this study, the authors use the type of library research that is descriptive analysis, namely by conducting research on library materials, then carried out an analysis by referring to the laws and regulations in the fields related to the problem under study. After discussing the existing problems, it can be concluded that the authority or competence of the State Administrative Court Judge is to examine, decide upon and resolve the State Administration dispute between civil persons or legal entities as a result of the issuance of a State Administration Decree. The State Administration Decree issued by the State Administration Agency / Officer can be denied by submitting Administrative Efforts consisting of Administrative Objections and Appeals. Against Decisions Administrative efforts in the form of administrative objections and appeals can be filed with the State Administrative Court within a grace period of 90 (ninety) days from the date of receipt or announcement of the Decree of the State Administration Agency / Officer.
7
Marsudi, Rochman, Julio Aipassa, Nelson Ariyadi Martinus, and Alifian Fajar Erditama. "Analysis of Corruption Case Investigation After The Implementation of Law No. 30 of 2014." Syntax Literate ; Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia 6, no. 4 (April 20, 2021): 1961. http://dx.doi.org/10.36418/syntax-literate.v6i4.2355.
Full textAbstract:
This research aims to examine granting discretion to government officials or state administration is a logical consequence of the welfare state's conception. This opens up opportunities for officials to commit corruption. Based on the administrative law, state officials' abuse of power is not a criminal offence but purely the administration's fault. However, with the issuance of the Government Administration Law, court judges from Corruption Crime have their right to judge whether there is an element of abusing their authority or not. Better laws and no negative impact or a growing number of problems. Evaluation and updating must be carried out to obtain maximum results and satisfy all parties. The first method employs in this research was the statute approach or the statutory approach. The second method used was a conceptual approach. The data collection used in this article is secondary data collection by finding and collecting data that has already been published in books, newspapers, magazines, journals, online portals regarding this issue. The result is there are still problems arising from the enactment of Law Number 30 of 2014, especially on constitutional grounds, State Administrative Courts, and Corruption based on discretion. Several journals and studies have been conducted to corroborate this question. Therefore, it is necessary to make adjustments and improvements in several areas to obtain a better law and does not cause adverse impacts or a growing number of problems.
8
Putrijanti, Aju. "The Control of Environment Management Through Administrative Court." E3S Web of Conferences 31 (2018): 09024. http://dx.doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/20183109024.
Full textAbstract:
Environment is important in human life. Conflict of interest comes between development of economy sector, citizenship needs and Governance, as it becomes completely difficult to analyze. The environment’s lawsuit is increase from the beginning of the Court established. The duty of Administrative Court are to investigate, decide and settle administrative disputes. The Governance has to pay attention before issuing the Government’s decree by put principle of good governance as priority. The issue in this paper is strengthening the role of Administrative Court to maintain the environment reuse by settle environment disputes based on the importance of environment. The administrative decisions in environment field may cause a loss or damage for the people. When the public officer did not put the appreciation to the reuse of environment and principle of good governance, it will become problems. The decision should be environmentally friendly. There should be certified judge to settle the dispute. The method of this research by examines the Judge’s verdict in environment disputes, and its relation with regulations and the newest issues. The conclusion is increase the role of the Administrative Court to maintain the environment by law enforcement through settle environment disputes.
9
Skoromnyy, Yaroslav. "Normative and Procedural Grounds for Legal Liability of a Judge." Path of Science 6, no. 12 (December 31, 2020): 1001–10. http://dx.doi.org/10.22178/pos.65-1.
Full textAbstract:
The article defines the basic principles of formation of normative and procedural grounds of legal responsibility of a judge. It has been found out that bringing a judge to a legal obligation by the regular basis indicates the necessity to enshrine the relevant list of offences in law. It has been determined that getting a judge to legal responsibility on regulatory grounds means committing an illegal action (from an objective point of view), primarily enshrined in the appropriate level of regulatory prohibitions. It has been established that the main essence of the factual basis for bringing a judge to legal responsibility is the action or inaction of a judge which indicates a prohibited legal norm, including offences. It has been found that the essence of the procedural and legal grounds for bringing a judge to legal liability primarily depends on the clarity of the decision of unique bodies that are competent in the field of imposing measures of legal liability on a judge. It has been proved that the procedural conditions for bringing judges to justice today are interrelated with the initiative of proceedings against them. It is determined that the basic principles of bringing judges to justice should be interpreted as objective signs of an act (action or inaction) committed by a judge on illegal grounds, which is the fundamental right that guarantees the victim of offence administration of fair justice is damaged. Researching the critical grounds for bringing a judge to various types of legal liability for committing an offence as prospective in further research in this direction has been suggested.
10
Nurianti, Leni Eva, Yuslim Yuslim, and Khairani Khairani. "The Position of the Attorney's Request for Information in Corruption Case Investigation as the Object of the Application for Abuse of Authority in the State Administrative Court (Study of Decision Number: 25 / G / 2015 / PTUN-MDN)." International Journal of Multicultural and Multireligious Understanding 7, no. 6 (September 23, 2020): 590. http://dx.doi.org/10.18415/ijmmu.v7i6.1957.
Full textAbstract:
The absolute authority of the State Administrative Court in examining, deciding and resolving State Administrative Disputes is based on objects in the form of decisions and / or actions regulated in the State Administrative Court Law (PERATUN Law) and the Government Administration Law (AP Law). In Decision Number: 25 / G / 2015 / PTUN-MDN, the Prosecutor's Request for Information is placed as the object of the request for abuse of authority. Based on these facts, normative legal research is carried out which aims to examine and analyze cases (case approach) with the statute approach and other regulations related to legal issues regarding how the limits of abuse of power are the absolute competence of the State Administrative Court and what is the position. Request for a statement from the Attorney General's Office in investigating corruption cases in the Procedural Law of the State Administrative Court. The conclusion of the research results is that the limit of abuse of power which is the absolute competence of the State Administrative Court is a decision and / or action as normalized in the Administrative Law and the Government Administration Law. The absence of procedural norms on abuse of authority in the Administrative Court Law makes Judges and Lawyers inaccurate in determining the legal basis for placing the Prosecutor's Request for Information as an object in the application for abuse of power when case Number : 25 / G / 2015 / PTUN-MDN is rolling in the Medan State Administrative Court . The norm vacancy is filled by Supreme Court Regulation Number 4 of 2015 which limits the absolute competence of the State Administrative Court in applications for abuse of power after the results of the Supervision of Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus and prior to criminal proceedings. The Prosecutor's Request for Information issued based on the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP) cannot be placed as an object based on the norms of Article 2 letter d of Law Number 9 of 2004, so the author advises the President and / or the House of Representatives to design amendments to the Administrative Law so that it is harmonious with the new norms presented by the Government Administration Law and it is hoped that Judges and Lawyers as law enforcers and justice carry out the norms of the Law ethically so that they do not get lost in determining the object of the application for abuse of power.
Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Administrative judge's office"
1
Wernert, Guillain. "Recherches sur l'office de juge-administrateur de l'environnement industriel." Thesis, université Paris-Saclay, 2020. http://www.theses.fr/2020UPASH009.
Full textAbstract:
La particularité du contentieux des mesures de police individuelles de l'environnement industriel est que le juge administratif dispose d'un office de juge-administrateur. Nous regroupons sous l'appellation de « police de l'environnement industriel » plusieurs polices administratives spéciales, créées sur le modèle de celle des installations classées pour la protection de l'environnement, et fonctionnant selon la même logique. En plus de la police des installations classées, la police de l'environnement industriel réunit la police des installations, ouvrages, travaux et activités (Iota) soumis à la loi sur l'eau, la police des installations nucléaires de base, la police de l'autorisation environnementale et, avec réserve, la police des canalisations de transport et celle des ouvrages d'infrastructures de transport de matières dangereuses. Grâce à l'office de juge-administrateur, le juge peut utiliser dans le contentieux des mesures de police de l'environnement industriel l'ensemble des pouvoirs juridictionnels, et notamment les plus grands. Ainsi, le cas échéant, après avoir estimé irrégulière la mesure de police contestée, le juge peut, lorsqu'il estime que c'est nécessaire pour trancher le litige qui lui est soumis, aller jusqu'à se transformer en juge-administrateur. Il substitue alors à l'appréciation de l'autorité administrative sa propre appréciation et fait œuvre d'administration active, c'est-à-dire qu'il prend une décision qui va directement rétablir la légalité bafouée par la mesure de police contestée. Cette recherche entend approfondir cet office de juge-administrateur de l'environnement industriel, que la doctrine a toujours présenté comme étant une particularité au sein du contentieux administratif. Elle va réfléchir à la place de cet office au sein du contentieux administratif, notamment pour savoir s'il est toujours possible de considérer qu'il s'agit d'un office particulier du juge administratif. Elle cherchera par ailleurs à savoir s'il est encore justifié que le juge dispose d'un tel office dans cette matièreThe particularity of litigation concerning individual policing measures in the industrial environment is that the administrative judge has an office of judge-administrator. We group together under the name of "industrial environment police" several special administrative policing, created on the model of classified installations for the protection of the environment, and operating according to the same logic. In addition to the policing of classified installations, the policing of the industrial environment brings together the policing of installations, structures, works and activities (Iota) subject to the water law, the policing of basic nuclear installations, the policing of environmental authorization and, with reservations, the policing of transport pipelines and that of infrastructure works for the transport of hazardous materials. Thanks to the office of judge-administrator, the judge can use all the jurisdictional powers, and in particular the larger ones, in litigation concerning industrial environment policing measures. Thus, where applicable, after having deemed the contested policing measure to be irregular, the judge may, when he considers it necessary to settle the dispute submitted to him, go so far as to transform himself into a judge-administrator. He then substitutes for the assessment of the administrative authority his own assessment and does the work of active administration, that is to say he takes a decision that will directly restore the legality flouted by the contested policing measure. This research intends to deepen this office of judge-administrator of the industrial environment, which the doctrine has always presented as being a particularity within administrative litigation. It will reflect on the place of this office within administrative litigation, in particular to find out whether it is still possible to consider that it is a special office of the administrative judge. It will also seek to know whether it is still justified for the judge to have such an office in this matter
2
Leroux-Campello, Marie. "Les sanctions en droit de la consommation." Thesis, Paris 2, 2018. http://www.theses.fr/2018PA020079.
Full textAbstract:
De multiples sanctions répondent à la violation du droit de la consommation. Ces sanctions sont perçues comme des outils indispensables au respect de ce droit. Leur prolifération ainsi que leur caractère dérogatoire au droit commun sont pourtant fréquemment dénoncés. Surpénalisation, prime à la mauvaise foi des consommateurs, automaticité, intrusion du juge dans la sphère contractuelle, atteindraient leur légitimité. L’instrumentalisation des sanctions provoquerait leur confusion et leur dénaturation généralisée. La pénalisation des sanctions civiles et la banalisation des sanctions pénales sont particulièrement critiquées. Mais ce double mouvement est-il systématique ? Ce travail entend apporter une réponse plus nuancée. L’abstraction de la protection offerte aux consommateurs exige certains aménagements. Saisir l’essence des sanctions devient alors nécessaire afin identifier celles qui participent d’un dévoiement. Certaines sanctions seront ainsi réhabilitées. D’autres, à l’inverse, seront condamnées. Après avoir mesuré le dévoiement des sanctions du droit de la consommation, une remise en ordre s’est avérée indispensable. Diverses propositions ont ainsi été formulées, dans une quête constante d’équilibre entre efficacité et validité, afin que l’effectivité du droit de la consommation soit elle-même mieux assuréeMultiple sanctions respond to violations of consumer law. These sanctions are perceived as essential tools for the respect of this right. However, their proliferation and their derogatory nature from ordinary law are frequently denounced. Over-criminalisation, primacy over bad faith on the part of consumers, automaticity, intrusion by the judge into the contractual sphere, would achieve their legitimacy. The instrumentalization of sanctions would lead to their confusion and general distortion. The criminalisation of civil sanctions and the trivialisation of criminal sanctions are particularly criticised. But is this double movement systematic ? This work aims to provide a more nuanced response. Abstracting from the protection offered to consumers requires certain adjustments. Understanding the essence of sanctions then becomes necessary in order to identify those that participate in a misuse. Some sanctions will thus be rehabilitated. Others, on the other hand, will be condemned. After having measured the misuse of consumer law sanctions, it was essential to put them in order. Many proposals were then formulated, so that the effectiveness of consumer law could be better ensured
3
Pros-Phalippon, Chloé. "Le juge administratif et les revirements de jurisprudence." Thesis, Saint-Etienne, 2014. http://www.theses.fr/2014STETT112.
Full textAbstract:
Le revirement de jurisprudence, en tension nécessaire entre la prévisibilité de la norme et la possibilité d’adaptation et de changement de la jurisprudence, n’a pendant longtemps été géré par le juge administratif qu’en fonction du contexte, par à-coups.Les temps ont changé car depuis le début des années deux mille, dans un contexte de valorisation du principe de sécurité juridique, une évolution s’est amorcée par une série d’arrêts puis a véritablement été consacrée par le juge administratif. Ce dernier a peu à peu substitué à la gestion strictement pragmatique des revirements une véritable méthode qui est fondée sur une logique d’ensemble. Cette méthode revêt les caractéristiques d’une politique jurisprudentielle en ce sens qu’elle traduit un choix, répond à un besoin et traduit une recherche de cohérence. Cette politique jurisprudentielle est le reflet de la conception que le juge a de son office. La pratique de la modulation des effets du revirement conduit le juge administratif non seulement à officialiser sa capacité à créer de la norme mais aussi à affirmer sa capacité à maîtriser les effets de la norme jurisprudentielle. La politique jurisprudentielle est donc symptomatique du rôle que le juge administratif s’assigne aujourd’hui. Il faut, néanmoins, relativiser l’impact de cette politique jurisprudentielle car elle ne conduit pas à une augmentation du flux des revirements. Peu de choses ont changé matériellement dans la pratique du juge administratif. Sur le plan symbolique, en revanche, la conception que le juge administratif a de son office de juge ordinaire par rapport au Conseil constitutionnel et de juge européen de droit commun a évoluéBorn out of the tension between legal certainty and the need for case law to evolve and adapt is the reversal of precedent. For a long time, the administrative judge only examined it in light of the problem at issue, on a case-by-case basis, without any clear methodology.But times have changed. Since the beginning of the years 2000, we have witnessed a new development, tied to the growing importance of the principle of legal security — with a series of new decisions which would eventually change the law. The administrative judge progressively abandoned his case-by-case analysis in favour of a toolbox based on an overall approach. This methodology has all the characteristics of a judicial policy (“politique jurisprudentielle”), meaning it reflects a choice, fulfills a need, and seeks to bring more coherence. The administrative judge chooses to assume his capacity to create law, while taking responsibility for departing from stare decisis. Because such a departure undermines legal certainty, he nevertheless acknowledges the need for the retroactive effects of his decisions to be adapted. Judicial policy is symptomatic of how the administrative judge understands his role. Not only can he create law, but, by limiting what happens when overturning a precedent, the administrative judge also shows his capacity to control its effects. It is important, however, not to overestimate its impact. For this judicial policy has not led to a higher rate of reversals of precedent. In practice, little has changed. On a symbolic level, however, how this judge sees his function vis-a-vis the Conseil constitutionnel and EU law has changed a lot
4
Lebrun, Geoffroy. "Office du juge administratif et questions préjudicielles : recherche sur la situation de juge a quo." Thesis, Bordeaux, 2014. http://www.theses.fr/2014BORD0261.
Full textAbstract:
Les questions préjudicielles interrogent l’office du juge administratif qui les formule.Accessoires du procès au principal, elles pourraient être considérées comme des questions annexes etsecondaires. Cette étude de contentieux administratif, fondée sur l’analyse systématique de lajurisprudence administrative, vise à démontrer le contraire. Remarquables tant par leur variété que parleurs incidences sur le procès, les questions préjudicielles restent souvent perçues comme descomplications de procédure inutiles visant à retarder la résolution du litige. Cette étude prend le partid’expliciter comment le juge administratif au principal en vient à construire une question préjudicielle,et quel en est le fondement juridique. De ce point de vue, si les parties au litige jouent bien souvent unrôle essentiel dans le relevé d’une exception, c’est en dernière analyse, le juge au principal qui détientle pouvoir de formulation de la question. Par ailleurs, la mise en oeuvre des questions préjudicielles,traditionnellement présentée comme paralysant l’office du juge, apparaît sous un nouveau jour. Loind’immobiliser l’office du juge au principal, l’étude minutieuse du droit positif révèle les importantspouvoirs que possède encore le juge a quo dans la maîtrise du procès dont il est compétemment saisi.Enfin, la réception par le juge a quo de la décision préjudicielle correspond à un partage de lasouveraineté juridictionnelle impliquant l’édiction d’un acte juridictionnel issu d’un processus decodécision. Cette étude livre un éclairage sur le fonctionnement et la complexité d’un mécanisme icitraité sous l’angle de l’office du juge lorsqu’il se place en situation de juge a quo. Elle permetégalement d’envisager les principales problématiques juridiques relatives à la fonction juridictionnellePreliminary issues challenge the role of the administrative law judge who formulates them.They are regarded as being accessory to the principle case at bar. They may even be perceived assecondary issues. This study of administrative litigation, based on a systematic analysis ofadministrative case law, aims to establish the opposite. Preliminary issues are characterized by theirdiversity as well as by their influence on the lawsuit, however, they are often perceived as useless andcumbersome procedural complications aiming to delay the resolution of the dispute. This study aimsto explicit the process by which the administrative law judge builds a preliminary issue and what is thelegal foundation of such an issue. From this angle, albeit the fact that the parties to the main disputeplay an essential role, it is the judge, who mainly retains the power to formulate the preliminary issue.This analysis challenges the traditional portrayal of preliminary issues as paralyzing the judicial“office”. To the contrary, far from immobilizing the “office of the judge”, an in depth study of positivelaw reveals the extensive powers that the judge a quo possesses with regards to the case at bar.Finally, the reception by the judge a quo of the preliminary ruling corresponds to a sharing of juridicalsovereignty implying the passing of a juridical act emanating from a process of co-decision. Thisstudy aims to shed light on the functioning and the complexity of a mechanism rarely examined fromthis angle. This study equally allows for an exploration of the main legal issues relating to the judicialfunction and the “Office” of the administrative law judge when placed in the situation of judge a quo
5
Akoun, Emilie. "Les moyens d'ordre public en contentieux administratif." Thesis, Grenoble, 2013. http://www.theses.fr/2013GREND012.
Full textAbstract:
L'élaboration du moyen d'ordre public par le juge est une quête constante d'équilibre. Ce dernier est, en effet, soumis à deux impératifs potentiellement contradictoires. Il lui faut assurer la préservation du corpus de valeurs composant l'ordre public contentieux. L'obligation de relever d'office et d'autoriser son invocation à tout instant du procès, après l'avoir soumis à la contradiction, lui permet d'atteindre pleinement cet objectif. Cependant ce régime coercitif est susceptible de mettre à mal la bonne administration de la justice. Les sujétions que le juge s'impose peuvent alourdir considérablement sa tâche. La vérification systématique de la présence au dossier d'un moyen d'ordre public, la communication aux parties et la possibilité pour ces dernières d'y répondre tout comme la dérogation aux règles de recevabilité des demandes nouvelles ralentissent le procès quand le juge administratif est mis plus que jamais au défi de l'efficacité. Il lui appartient alors de dépasser cet antagonisme en conciliant la nécessité de protéger l'ordre public contentieux avec celle de dispenser une justice bien administrée. Le juge parvient à cet équilibre en agissant tant sur la notion que sur le régime des moyens d'ordre public. Celui-ci crée et entretient l'indétermination de la notion de sorte que la nomenclature de ces moyens est amenée à évoluer au cours des époques et des contentieux. Il trouve alors dans cette plasticité la liberté lui permettant de contrebalancer les obligations procédant de son régime. Ces marges d'appréciation paraissent néanmoins insuffisantes. La jurisprudence la plus récente du Conseil d'État vient neutraliser et concurrencer cette technique. Sa pérennité n'est toutefois pas remise en cause. Le moyen d'ordre public a vocation à demeurer et pourrait même être renforcé par la reconnaissance par le juge d'un pouvoir de relever d'office les moyens ordinairesL'auteur n'a pas fourni de résumé en anglais
6
Leclerc, Caroline. "Le renouvellement de l'office du juge administratif français." Thesis, Dijon, 2012. http://www.theses.fr/2012DIJOD005.
Full textAbstract:
L’étude de l’évolution des méthodes du juge administratif français doit être rattachée aux nouvelles priorités choisies par lui dans l’exercice de sa fonction. « Dire le droit et trancher les litiges » reste bien la principale mission du juge administratif. Certaines des composantes de son office ont néanmoins pris une importance renouvelée dans le cadre d’une politique de renforcement de sa légitimité. La juridiction administrative tient en effet de plus en plus compte de la personne du justiciable et a placé le renouveau de son office sous le signe de la protection des droits fondamentaux, terrain d’élection du dialogue des juges. Ces tendances fortes ont motivé et alimenté une profonde rénovation de ses techniques et méthodes de jugement. Le juge administratif français est aujourd’hui pleinement adapté au temps de l’action administrative et à ses enjeux. Qu’il s’agisse des opérations de contrôle de légalité ou de leur issue, l’efficacité de ses interventions est manifeste. En pleine possession de ses pouvoirs, le juge administratif français apporte une réponse adéquate à la demande de justice contemporaine et a une nouvelle fois relevé le défi du renouvellementThe study of the evolution of the methods used by the French administrative judge is necessarily connected to the new priorities that were chosen regarding the carrying out of his functions. « Pass judgment and resolve disputes » remains the foremost mission of the administrative judge. Some of the aspects of his powers and duties have nevertheless grown in importance as part of a policy of strengthening his legitimacy.. Indeed , administrative courts increasingly take into account the persons subject to trial and they have focused the revitalization of the jurisdiction on the protection of fundamental rights, a favoured field for the dialogue of judges. Those strong orientations led to a deep reform of their techniques and methods of judgment. The French administrative judge is now fully in accordance with the requirements of administrative actions and the issues at stake. Whether it concerns reviews of legality or their outcome, those interventions are obviously efficient. Thanks to the powers he now detains, the French administrative judge brings an adequate response to the needs of modern justice and has once again taken up the tough challenge of self-reforming his functions
7
Charité, Maxime. "Excès de pouvoir législatif et excès de pouvoir administratif : Etude comparée de l'office des juges constitutionnel et administratif français." Thesis, Orléans, 2019. http://www.theses.fr/2019ORLE0001.
Full textAbstract:
En France, le contentieux des normes générales se décline aujourd’hui en deux ensembles principaux, le recours pour excès de pouvoir dirigé contre les actes réglementaires et le contrôle de constitutionnalité des lois. Partageant un certain nombre de propriétés, ces derniers s’analysent non seulement comme des « contentieux objectifs », mais également comme des « contentieux d’annulation ». C’est ainsi qu’afin d’accomplir leur office, les juges constitutionnel et administratif français doivent tous les deux, d’abord, établir un rapport de norme à norme, puis, le cas échéant, annuler l’acte juridique contraire à une norme juridique qui s’impose à lui. Ces propriétés communes contrastent avec les conditions différentes dans lesquelles les deux juges du Palais-Royal sont appelés à statuer. Cette tension permanente entre les propriétés qu’ils partagent et les conditions différentes dans lesquelles ils s’accomplissent fait que les rapports entre l’office du Conseil constitutionnel et celui du juge de l’excès de pouvoir oscillent entre l’unité et la dualité. Précisément, la présente étude comparée, intitulée « Excès de pouvoir législatif et excès de pouvoir administratif » par référence à l’étude pionnière du doyen Vedel dans la première livraison des Cahiers du Conseil constitutionnel, a pour objet de démontrer qu’au fur et à mesure du déroulement des étapes du contentieux, la démarche du Conseil constitutionnel et celle du juge administratif se rapprochent au point de s’identifier. L’inscription de cette comparaison dans le cadre d’une théorie des contraintes juridiques nous permet ainsi de montrer que si, dans la recherche de l’excès de pouvoir, l’office des juges constitutionnel et administratif français est dominé par la dualité, il est, dans la sanction de l’excès de pouvoir, marqué par une profonde unitéIn France, general norms litigation is nowadays divided into two main groups, the actions for abuse of power directed against the normative acts and the control of constitutionality of the laws. Sharing a certain number of similarities, they are analyzed not only as "objective litigation", but also as "cancellation litigation". Thus, in order to fulfill their role, French constitutional and administrative judges must both, first, establish a norm-to-norm report and, if necessary, cancel the general legal act contrary to a superior legal norm. These similarities contrast with the different conditions in which the two judges of the Palais-Royal are called to judge. This permanent tension between the similarities they share and the different conditions in which they are called to judge makes the relationships between the role of the Constitutional Council and that of the abuse of power’s judge oscillate between unity and duality. Precisely, the present comparative study, named "Abuse of legislative power and abuse of administrative power" after the study of Dean Vedel in the first numbers of Constitutional Council Review, aims to demonstrate that, as the stages of litigation progress, the approach of the Constitutional Council and that of the administrative judge get closer to the point of identifying. The inscription of this comparison in the framework of a theory of legal constraints allows us to show that if, in the search for abuse of power, the role of French constitutional and administrative judges is dominated by duality, it is, in the sanction of abuse of power, marked by a deep unity
8
Baillargeon, Johan. "La question prioritaire de constitutionnalité et le juge administratif." Thesis, Aix-Marseille, 2016. http://www.theses.fr/2016AIXM1043.
Full textAbstract:
La question prioritaire de constitutionnalité constitue une véritable « révolution » en droit interne, tant au regard des institutions de l’ordre juridique français qu’au niveau de la protection constitutionnelle des droits fondamentaux des citoyens. Ce mécanisme novateur, permettant désormais au Conseil constitutionnel d’opérer un contrôle de constitutionnalité des lois a posteriori, ne peut toutefois fonctionner sans le concours des juridictions ordinaires qui s’érigent désormais en juges du filtre de la constitutionnalité. Or, en prenant le parti d’organiser une telle procédure, le constituant et le législateur organique ont invité officiellement le juge administratif à participer au contrôle de la constitutionnalité des lois. Au-delà de ce premier constat, que la thèse s’attache à étayer in concreto, l’entrée en vigueur de cette nouvelle voie de droit a entrainé une modernisation du droit tant au niveau juridictionnel qu’institutionnel. Celle-ci s’analyse comme la conséquence immédiate du processus de constitutionnalisation des diverses branches du droit qu’accroit de manière exponentielle l’utilisation quotidienne de la question prioritaire de constitutionnalité. Le droit du contentieux administratif, qui voit certaines de ses règles renouvelées sous l’effet de la nouvelle jurisprudence constitutionnelle affectant concomitamment l’office du juge administratif et plus globalement l’exercice de la justice administrative, montre que le juge administratif n’est pas seulement acteur de ce mécanisme mais aussi son sujetThe priority preliminary ruling on the issue of constitutionality is a real "revolution" in domestic law, both in terms of the institutions of the French legal system and at the level of constitutional protection of fundamental rights of citizens. This innovative mechanism, now allowing the Constitutional Council to reviewa posteriori the constitutionality of laws, however, can not function without the help of the ordinary courtswhich are now elevated as judges of the constitutional filter. Taking the party to organize such a procedure, the constituents and the legislator officially invited the administrative courts to participate in the review of the constitutionality of laws. Beyond this observation, which the thesis illustrates concretely, the entry in force of this new remedy has led to a modernization of the law both at the institutional and the jurisdictional levels.This is the immediate consequence of the process of constitutionalisation of the various branches of the law which the daily use of the priority question of constitutionality exponentially increases. The contentious rules before administrative courts, which are renewed under the influence of the new constitutional case law affecting simultaneously the powers of the administrative courts and more generally the exercise of administrative justice, shows the administrative courts are not only the participants of the process but also its subject matter
9
Lepoutre, Naïke. "Le dialogue entre le juge administratif français et la Cour de justice de l'Union européenne par le mécanisme du renvoi préjudiciel." Thesis, Lille 2, 2016. http://www.theses.fr/2016LIL20019.
Full textAbstract:
L’attitude du juge administratif français face à la Cour de justice et au regard des obligations imposées par la procédure préjudicielle est particulièrement démonstrative des difficultés de mise en place d’un dialogue des juges, bien que le mécanisme préjudiciel soit considéré comme le canal privilégié de celui-ci et comme son pendant juridique. Le juge administratif a cru pouvoir affirmer son indépendance et son autonomie en usant de la théorie de l’acte clair et de la règle du précédent. Les abus commis dans l’utilisation de ces moyens procéduraux, occultant le renvoi préjudiciel, ont posé des difficultés et il en fut de même pour l’autorité et les effets des arrêts préjudiciels. De son côté la Cour a aussi exprimé des volontés contraires ou incompatibles avec l’instauration d’un dialogue entre juges par la voie préjudicielle. Elle a voulu affirmer son autorité en utilisant de façon extensive les compétences que lui avaient délivrées les Traités. Fort heureusement, par plusieurs assouplissements jurisprudentiels de part et d’autre, les relations dialogiques préjudicielles se sont bonifiées. Une acceptation mutuelle des compétences et des autorités a été acquise par la voie de dialogues qu’il convient de cerner, d’entretenir, de favoriser et de fortifier par le biais d’échanges courants et de techniques nouvelles, mieux adaptées au pluralisme juridique européen et au renouvellement actuel de l’office du juge en EuropeThe difficulties to establish a dialogue between judges are well illustrated by french administrative judge’s attitude with respect to the Court of Justice of European Union and regarding the preliminary ruling proceedings. Indeed, french administrative judges have clearly considered that they could assert their autonomy through the use of the acte clair doctrine and the rule of precedent (stare decisis) to prevent the preleminary ruling. The excessive use of both procedural approaches has been the source of numerous problems, notably for the authority and effects of preliminary ruling decisions. For its part, the Court also took positions either radically opposite to that of the national judges, or that at least were not in favour of a putative dialogue. Indeed, the Court has clearly wished to assert its authority over the national judges by an extensive use of the competences European Treaties awarded to it. This context has fortunately started to resolve itself through a reciprocal acceptance of competences and prerogatives by the concerned authorities in the dialogue. This emerging dialogue must be reinforced and promoted via routine exchanges and novel techniques. Both jurisdictions will have to steer in harmony in this direction of the european legal pluralism
10
Constant, Anne-Laure. "Les voies de recours spéciales en contentieux administratif français." Thesis, Rennes 1, 2016. http://www.theses.fr/2016REN1G020.
Full textAbstract:
Pour contester les décisions juridictionnelles du juge administratif français, un éventail de voies de recours est mis à la disposition des justiciables. Si l'appel et la cassation sont les plus connues et les plus usitées, il existe six autres voies d'action que l'on peut qualifier de « spéciales » dès lors qu'elles remettent en cause un manquement précis à l'office du juge. A la différence des voies de recours habituelles qui constituent une critique globale, les voies de recours spéciales correspondent chacune à une hypothèse d'erreur judiciaire spécifique. Ainsi, le requérant exerçant une telle voie de droit attaque la décision de justice non pas dans sa totalité mais sur un aspect particulier, de forme ou de fond. Cette argumentation étroite ne préjuge cependant pas l'objectif recherché : une modification voire une rétractation de la décision initiale.Présentées généralement sous la forme d'une simple énumération de voies de recours exceptionnelles, leur étude révèle qu'elles suivent une logique d'ensemble propre à leur reconnaître la qualité de catégorie juridique. Cette cohérence de groupe complémentaire de l'appel et de la cassation permet de mettre en évidence une théorie générale des voies de recours en contentieux administratif françaisIn France, all defendants have several remedies to contest an administrative judge's decision. If appeal and cassation complaints are the best known and the most used, there are six other remedies which can be qualified as « special » as they demonstrate a specific failure of the judicial function. Unlike common remedies which are a general criticism of the judgment, each special remedy relates to a particular error of the judge. Thefore, a defendant who applies one of these remedies is challenging not the whole judgment but its specific aspect, whether form or substance. However, by applying one of these remedies, the defendant is targeting the modification or revocation of the judgment.Frequently presented as a list of unusual remedies, the research shows that they actually follow a general pattern that allows one to consider them as a legal category of their own. Complementary to appeal and cassation complaints, this group system serves to highlight the existence of a general theory of remedies in French administrative law
Books on the topic "Administrative judge's office"
1
United States. Congress. House. Committee on the Judiciary. Technical amendments to laws relating to the courts: Report (to accompany S. 1284) (including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office). [Washington, D.C.?: U.S. G.P.O., 1991.
Find full text
2
United States. Dept. of Justice. Executive Office for Immigration Review. Ethics manual: For members of the Board of Immigration Appeals, immigration judges, and administrative law judges employed by the Executive Office for Immigration Review. [Falls Church, Va: U.S. Department of Justice, Executive Office for Immigration Review, 2001.
Find full text
3
North Carolina. Administrative Office of the Courts. Administrative Office of the Courts report to the Legislature on mandatory retirement requirements for North Carolina judges and justices. [Raleigh, N.C.]: Supreme Court of North Carolina, Administrative Office of the Courts, 2005.
Find full text
4
Golder, Hilary. High and responsible office: A history of the NSW magistracy. South Melbourne: Sydney University Press, 1991.
Find full text
5
Telliez, Romain. Les officiers devant la justice dans le royaume de France au XIVe siècle: Per potentiam officii. Paris: Champion, 2005.
Find full text
6
Judicial Improvements Act of 2002: Report (to accompany H.R. 3892) (including cost estimate of the Congressional Budget Office). [Washington, D.C: U.S. G.P.O., 2002.
Find full text
7
Kasassbeh, Hussein F. The office of qāḍī in the early ʻAbbāsid Caliphate, 132-247/750-861. [Muʼtah, Jordan]: Deanship of Research and Graduate Studies, Muʼtah University, 1994.
Find full text
8
Kasassbeh, Hussein F. The office of qāḍī in the early ʻAbbāsid Caliphate, 132-247/750-861. [Muʾtah, Jordan]: Deanship of Research and Graduate Studies, Muʾtah University, 1994.
Find full text
9
United States. Congress. House. Committee on Ways and Means. Subcommittee on Social Security. Judicial independence of administrative law judges at the Social Security Administration: Hearing before the Subcommittee on Social Security of the Committee on Ways and Means, House of Representatives, One Hundred First Congress, second session, June 13, 1990. Washington: U.S. G.P.O., 1990.
Find full text
10
Sako, Rebecca. Suspects and the criminal justice system: Manual for police officers, prosecutors, area court judges, etc. Kaduna, Nigeria: Human Rights Monitor, 1999.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Administrative judge's office"
1
Skowronek, Stephen, John A. Dearborn, and Desmond King. "Depth in Appointment." In Phantoms of a Beleaguered Republic, 127–64. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780197543085.003.0009.
Full textAbstract:
This chapter examines depth in appointment, focusing on the tension between qualifications for administrative office and expectations for presidential control. What Trump’s administration has brought to the fore are the suspicions harbored by a unitary executive toward qualifications per se and in the broadest sense of the term. Ability, sound judgment, commitment to assigned duties are all presumptive conditions on presidential control, implicit limits on political subordination, anticipated brakes on personal will. Conversely, the demand for executive branch unity elevates loyalty above all other qualifications. Here, we offer snapshots of the drive to dissolve administrative qualifications into loyalty to the president at several sites, considering: a hybrid arrangement at the National Security Council; the use of acting appointments at the Office of the Director of National Intelligence, Department of Homeland Security, and the Consumer Financial Protection Bureau; the assault on merit-based appointments for administrative law judges; and protections against at-will removal at independence agencies like the Federal Reserve.
2
McLean, Janet. "The Authority of the Administration." In The Foundations and Future of Public Law, 45–66. Oxford University Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198845249.003.0003.
Full textAbstract:
The authority claims of the administration have undergone radical change with consequences for the shape and content of administrative law. In the seventeenth century, authority was claimed in office, as a means to limit the imposition of the King’s will and to secure the independence of officials, especially the judges. In the eighteenth century, virtue, property, and independence became the basis for office, and the common law sought to enhance such authority through notions of public trust. After the nineteenth-century transition to more centralised and bureaucratic hierarchy, democracy became the new source of authority for the administration, reinforced by the ultra vires doctrine. In each era, the authority claims of the administration have been reflected in the frameworks for judicial supervision. In this way the common law has simultaneously constituted and controlled authority. In the present day we are in the process of rethinking whence administrators derive their legitimate authority and the theoretical foundations of judicial review. Beginning with the authority claims of the administration and framing a juridical response which reflects and tests such claims would be a good place to start.
3
Singh, Rattan. "Judging the Subordinate Judiciary." In Advancing Civil Justice Reform and Conflict Resolution in Africa and Asia, 75–92. IGI Global, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.4018/978-1-7998-7898-8.ch005.
Full textAbstract:
The subordinate judiciary of a nation plays an important role in the administration and dispensation of justice. A judicial officer in the subordinate courts performs a “pious duty” in the service of justice. A majority of the members of the society come in contact with the trial court judges rather than with the appellate or higher court judges. No law, court, precedent, or custom can provide guidelines for better administration of justice, because there is no fixed formula to find the solution of the problem. In such situations, personal qualities, experience, training, and worth of a trial judge make themselves manifest. Through the image of subordinate judiciary and its functioning, the true picture of judiciary presents itself to the nation. The mind of the judiciary can be known to the millions only through the actions and working of the subordinate or trial court judges. In this chapter, researcher has pointed out some problems faced by subordinate courts and judges due to the backlog, and the daily increase, in legal cases.
4
Bulmer, W. Elliot. "Judiciary, Administration, Elections and Miscellaneous Provisions." In Westminster and the World, 217–30. Policy Press, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1332/policypress/9781529200621.003.0011.
Full textAbstract:
This chapter emphasizes that a particular care must be taken by the judiciary to perform its functions properly and ensure that the mechanisms for the appointment of judges, the rules protecting their neutrality and independence, and the procedures for their removal from office are sufficiently robust. It recounts the practice in early Westminster Model constitutions wherein judicial appointments were made by the Crown and acted on the advice of the prime minister. It also examines the Ontario Judicial Appointments Board and the Judicial Appointments Advisory Board in Ireland that apply executive-centred appointment mechanisms. The chapter mentions that the Indian constitution sought to regularize the practice of informal consultations and put it upon a constitutional footing. It considers Article 124 of the Indian constitution, which states that judges of the Supreme Court are appointed by the president.
5
Tilmann, Winfried. "Powers of the Court as regards representatives." In Unified Patent Protection in Europe: A Commentary. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198755463.003.0458.
Full textAbstract:
Persons vested with power of representation, being admitted to the Court, are designated by the German legal expression of ‘Organe der Rechtspflege’ (officers for the administration of justice). The willingness to act in such capacity is a condition for national authorization to practise as a lawyer. For that reason, the UPC may exercise disciplinary power over representatives authorized to act before the Court. The Presidents, the presiding judges, and judges rapporteur or single judges or standing judges also exercise domiciliary authority within the premises of the UPC. The measures they may take, on one basis or another, range from formal warnings to revoking a representative’s authorization to act in particular proceedings (Rule 291) or even in all proceedings, as well as a limited or permanent ban from the premises of the Court.
6
Le Sueur, Andrew. "8. The Foundations of Justice." In The Changing Constitution, 209–38. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198806363.003.0008.
Full textAbstract:
Everybody agrees there is broad consensus that the constitutional principle of judicial independence is important. In relation to the core judicial functions of hearing cases and writing judgments, the central meaning and application of the principle is fairly straightforward: people holding public office (politicians, parliamentarians, and officials) must refrain from interfering with judicial decision-making in individual cases; and judges should be protected from illegitimate pressure from the news media and other organizations. But hearings and judgments do not ‘just happen’; they have to be facilitated by a wide array of institutions and processes (the justice infrastructure), covering matters as diverse as court buildings, litigation procedures, judicial careers, and legal aid. In the absence of a codified constitution, in the United Kingdom the justice infrastructure is set out in Acts of Parliament, delegated legislation and ‘soft law’ (including the 2003 ‘Concordat’). The day-to-day running of the justice infrastructure can be understood in terms of who carries out functions related to the administration of justice—the judges, government (in particular, the Lord Chancellor), functions shared between judges and government, and functions given to arm’s length bodies. Periodically, the justice infrastructure is reshaped. This is a constitutionally significant activity that may take place in different settings—the political environment, expert environments, and blended environments. The day-to-day running of this infrastructure, along with its periodic reshaping, presents numerous and complex challenges for a legal system intent on respecting judicial independence and facilitating access to justice.
7
Morton, James. "The Secular Church and the Laity." In Byzantine Religious Law in Medieval Italy, 139–54. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198861140.003.0008.
Full textAbstract:
Chapter 7 examines the surviving evidence for nomocanon use among the secular (i.e. non-monastic) church and lay officials under Norman rule. While far fewer manuscripts survive from these circles than from monasteries, it is nonetheless clear that nomocanons continued to be used not only by Greek bishops but even by lay judges and notaries. The chapter begins with an examination of the Italo-Greek episcopate, highlighting the significance of the bishop’s judicial role in the Byzantine church and the lack of evidence for any kind of influence of Latin canon law on the nomocanons of Greek bishops of southern Italy in the twelfth century. It then discusses two fascinating twelfth-century nomocanons: the Epitome Marciana from southern Calabria and the ‘Nomocanon of Doxapatres’ from Rossano. The manuscripts provide decisive evidence that Greek lay judges in the Norman kingdom played a role in the administration of ecclesiastical justice, relying entirely on Byzantine legal sources. In some cases, as in Rossano, Greek aristocratic families would dominate both the archiepiscopal and civil judicial offices, with the result that the family would possess multiple manuscripts of Byzantine civil and canon law.
8
Gillespie, Alisdair, and Siobhan Weare. "7. The Structure of the Tribunals." In The English Legal System. Oxford University Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198785439.003.0007.
Full textAbstract:
This chapter examines the jurisdiction and structure of tribunals. It then considers two very different tribunals through the use of case studies, namely the Employment Tribunals and the Investigatory Powers Tribunal. Tribunals have existed for many years but have traditionally operated as an oversight system for administrative issues. In recent years, the number of tribunals has increased and their work has begun to involve more complicated legal questions. Tribunals are now, in essence, a parallel system of dispute resolution and their complexity is recognized by the fact that their presiding officers now bear the title of ‘judge’. This chapter examines this parallel judicial system and identifies similarities between and differences from court justice.
9
Gillespie, Alisdair A., and Siobhan Weare. "7. The Structure of the Tribunals." In The English Legal System, 225–42. Oxford University Press, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198830900.003.0007.
Full textAbstract:
This chapter examines the jurisdiction and structure of tribunals. It then considers two very different tribunals through the use of case studies, namely the Employment Tribunals and the Investigatory Powers Tribunal. Tribunals have existed for many years but have traditionally operated as an oversight system for administrative issues. In recent years, the number of tribunals has increased and their work has begun to involve more complicated legal questions. Tribunals are now, in essence, a parallel system of dispute resolution and their complexity is recognized by the fact that their presiding officers now bear the title of ‘judge’. This chapter examines this parallel judicial system and identifies similarities between and differences from court justice.
10
Gillespie, Alisdair A., and Siobhan Weare. "7. The Structure of the Tribunals." In The English Legal System, 225–42. Oxford University Press, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/he/9780198868996.003.0007.
Full textAbstract:
This chapter examines the jurisdiction and structure of tribunals. It then considers two very different tribunals through the use of case studies, namely the Employment Tribunals and the Investigatory Powers Tribunal. Tribunals have existed for many years but have traditionally operated as an oversight system for administrative issues. In recent years, the number of tribunals has increased and their work has begun to involve more complicated legal questions. Tribunals are now, in essence, a parallel system of dispute resolution and their complexity is recognized by the fact that their presiding officers now bear the title of ‘judge’. This chapter examines this parallel judicial system and identifies similarities between and differences from court justice.