Academic literature on the topic 'Administrative law – South Africa'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Administrative law – South Africa.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Administrative law – South Africa"
Hoexter, Cora. "Administrative Justice in Kenya: Learning from South Africa's Mistakes." Journal of African Law 62, no. 1 (February 2018): 105–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0021855318000025.
Full textOlivier, Marius, and Avinash Govindjee. "The Inter-Relationship between Administrative Law and Labour Law: Public Sector Employment Perspectives from South Africa." Southern African Public Law 30, no. 2 (December 1, 2017): 319–46. http://dx.doi.org/10.25159/2522-6800/3583.
Full textQuinot, Geo. "Substantive Legitimate Expectations in South African and European Administrative Law." German Law Journal 5, no. 1 (January 1, 2004): 65–85. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s2071832200012256.
Full textPretorius, D. M. "“What’s past is prologue”: an historical overview of judicial review in South Africa – part 2." Fundamina 26, no. 2 (2020): 424–519. http://dx.doi.org/10.47348/fund/v26/i2a6.
Full textIkhariale, M. A. "THE DOCTRINE OF LEGITIMATE EXPECTATIONS: PROSPECTS AND PROBLEMS IN CONSTITUTIONAL LITIGATION IN SOUTH AFRICA." Journal of African Law 45, no. 1 (April 2001): 1–12. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0221855301001572.
Full textHenrico, R. "Administrative law and voluntary religious associations in South Africa: some reflections." Tydskrif vir die Suid-Afrikaanse Reg 2021, no. 3 (2021): 521–37. http://dx.doi.org/10.47348/tsar/2021/i3a6.
Full textDo Vale, Helder Ferreira. "Educational Reforms and Decentralization in Brazil, South Africa, South Korea and Spain." Lex localis - Journal of Local Self-Government 14, no. 3 (July 31, 2016): 591–612. http://dx.doi.org/10.4335/14.3.591-612(2016).
Full textAbduroaf, Muneer. "Application of the Islamic Law of Succession in South Africa." Obiter 41, no. 2 (October 1, 2020): 396–409. http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/obiter.v41i2.9159.
Full textMupangavanhu, Brighton M., and Yeukai Mupangavanhu. "Alignment of Student Discipline Design and Administration to Constitutional and National Law Imperatives in South Africa." Potchefstroom Electronic Law Journal/Potchefstroomse Elektroniese Regsblad 14, no. 2 (June 6, 2017): 124. http://dx.doi.org/10.17159/1727-3781/2011/v14i2a2564.
Full textSippel, Harald. "Recht und Emotion: ‚German Angst‘ und das Verwaltungshandeln in Deutsch-Südwestafrika." Recht in Afrika 21, no. 2 (2018): 208–33. http://dx.doi.org/10.5771/2363-6270-2018-2-208.
Full textDissertations / Theses on the topic "Administrative law – South Africa"
Maree, Petrus Jacobus Hermanus. "Investigating an alternative administrative-law system in South Africa." Thesis, Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 2013. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/85591.
Full textENGLISH ABSTRACT: This dissertation considers the question whether there are viable alternatives to the conceptual framework within which the South African administrative-law system operates, given that the administration now functions under new constitutional demands and new approaches to administrative engagement. The intention is not to proffer concrete recommendations for such a system, but only to propose an approach by means of which questions concerning the legal regulation of the administration and administrative function may be addressed. The dissertation introduces the concept of the contextualised administrative-law system. This concept emphasises the legal relationship between the public administration and the judiciary, but is not limited to this relationship. The administrative-law system does not operate in a vacuum, though, and is informed by the conceptual framework within which the system operates. The system is also a function of its geo-political and socio-economic context. The historical development of the doctrine of separation of powers, as one aspect of the conceptual framework, is traced. Thereby the normative, dynamic and flexible nature of the doctrine is established. On this basis, the potential and value of a fourth branch, the administration, within the separation-of-powers doctrine is assessed. By implication, the administrative function would constitute a fourth, distinct function in addition to the legislative, executive and judicial functions. The concept of the administrative-law system is consequently applied to the South African context. Firstly, the development of the South African system is outlined and, secondly, the administrative-law relationship is analysed. This discussion establishes that the system is characterised by an embryonic administrative law, the equating of administrative law and judicial review, an emphasis on the rule-of-law or “red-light” approach to administrative regulation, a rhetoric of deference, and the supremacy of the Constitution of the Republic of South Africa, 1996. Therefore, the system must be informed by the Constitution and, arguably, by Karl Klare’s project of transformative constitutionalism and Etienne Mureinik’s “culture of justification”. The content of the separation of powers is also investigated by means of an historical analysis of the considerations that rationalise the existence of an independent administrative jurisdiction in France. This entails an exposition of the Conseil d’État’s structure, organisation and dual function. Principles that describe the French system, other than the pure separation of powers, are discussed, namely, the duality of jurisdiction, the separation of administrative and judicial authorities, the separation of the administrative jurisdiction and active administration, the maxim “to judge the administration is still administering”, and the hybrid nature of administrative litigation. The legal regulation of public contracts can be regarded as a doctrinal perspective of the administrative-law system. The public contract is discussed as one form of administration, due to its conceptual ambiguity as a legal instrument on the boundary between public and private law and due to the administration’s increasing contractual activity. To an extent the contrat administratif of French law indicates that particular legal rules are an extension of the broader principles, considerations and institutional structures discussed in the preceding sections. This dissertation introduces an approach that emphasises the relationship between the administration and the judiciary as well as the conceptual framework within which the administrative-law system operates. Through the application of this approach to the South African context and to public contracting the key concepts and debates underlying an appropriate administrative-law system in South Africa are identified and investigated. This constitutes a platform for the development of a particular administrative-law system and an exposition of viable alternatives to the conceptual framework within which the system operates.
AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: Hierdie proefskrif ondersoek die vraag of daar lewensvatbare alternatiewe tot die konseptuele raamwerk van die huidige Suid-Afrikaanse administratiefreg-stelsel moontlik is. Dié vraag word gestel teen die agtergrond van die nuwe grondwetlike vereistes en benaderings waaraan administratiewe interaksie moet voldoen. Die bedoeling is nie om aanbevelings vir die bestaande stelsel te maak nie, maar eerder om ‘n benadering voor te stel waarin vrae oor die regulering van die administrasie en die administratiewe funksie geakkommodeer kan word. In die proses skep die proefskrif ‘n nuwe konsep: die administratiefreg-stelsel in konteks, wat die regsverhouding tussen die administrasie en die regbank beklemtoon, terwyl dit nie beperk is tot die verhouding nie. Uiteraard word die administratiefregstelsel beïnvloed deur die konseptuele raamwerk waarin dit funksioneer, terwyl dit verder ook ‘n funksie is van sy geopolitiese en sosio-ekonomiese konteks. Die historiese ontwikkeling van die skeiding van magte, een aspek van die konseptuele raamwerk, word bespreek en daardeur word die normatiewe, dinamiese en buigsame aard van die leerstuk bevestig. Hiermee word die potensiaal en waarde van ‘n vierde been, naamlik die administrasie, binne die skeiding-van-magte leerstuk oorweeg, met die implikasie dat die administratiewe funksie ‘n onafhanklike, vierde funksie vestig, benewens die wetgewende, uitvoerende en regsprekende funksies. Die konsep van die administratiefreg-stelsel word gevolglik toegepas op die Suid- Afrikaanse konteks. Eerstens word die ontwikkeling van die Suid-Afrikaanse stelsel uiteengesit en dan tweedens word die administratiefreg-verhouding ontleed. Hierdie bespreking bevestig dat die stelsel gekenmerk word deur ‘n onderontwikkelde administratiefreg, die gelykstelling van die administratiefreg en geregtelike hersiening, die beklemtoning van die regstaat en ‘n sogenaamde rooilig-benadering tot administratiewe regulasie, ‘n retoriek van geregtike agting, en die oppergesag van die Grondwet van die Republiek van Suid-Afrika, 1996. Juis as gevolg hiervan moet die stelsel op die Grondwet gegrond word. Daar word ook geargumenteer dat Karl Klare se transformerende konstitusionalisme sowel as Etienne Mureinik se kultuur van regverdiging die stelsel vorm behoort te gee. Die skeiding van magte se inhoud word ook aan ‘n historiese ontleding van Franse reg onderwerp om sodoende die rasionaal agter die onafhanklike administratiewe jurisdiksie in Frankryk te verduidelik. Dit behels ‘n uiteensetting van die Conseil d’État se struktuur, interne organisering en tweeledige funksie. Die beginsels wat die Franse stelsel beskryf, bo-en-behalwe die suiwer skeiding van magte, word bespreek en dit is by name die dualiteit van jurisdiksie, die skeiding van administratiewe en regsprekende owerhede, die skeiding van die administratiewe jurisdiksie en aktiewe administrasie, die leuse wanneer die administrasie beoordeel word, word daar steeds administreer, en die gemengde aard van administratiewe regsgedinge. Die openbare kontrak word bespreek as ‘n instrument van administrasie gegewe die konseptuele dubbelsinnigheid van daardie regskonsep, wat op die grens tussen publiek- en privaatreg lê, en as gevolg van die administrasie se toenemende kontraktuele aktiwiteit. In ‘n mate dui die Franse contrat administratif daarop dat bepaalde regsreëls ‘n uitbreiding van die breër beginsels, oorwegings en institusionele strukture is, soos in die voorafgaande afdelings bespreek word. Dus stel hierdie proefskrif ‘n benadering voor wat die verhouding tussen die administrasie en die regbank, sowel as die konseptuele raamwerk waarbinne die administratiefreg-stelsel funksioneer, beklemtoon. Deur hierdie benadering toe te pas op die Suid-Afrikaanse konteks, en op openbare kontraktering, word die konsepte en debatte geïdentifiseer en ondersoek wat ‘n gepaste administratiefreg-stelsel onderskryf. Dit vorm ‘n basis vir die ontwikkeling van ‘n bepaalde administratiefregstelsel en die uiteensetting van lewensvatbare alternatiewe tot die konseptuele raamwerk waarbinne die stelsel funksioneer.
Janse, van Rensburg Sean. "Administrative Penalties in South African Competition Law." Diss., University of Pretoria, 2020. http://hdl.handle.net/2263/75220.
Full textMini Dissertation (LLM)--University of Pretoria, 2020.
Mercantile Law
LLM
Unrestricted
Voultsos, Leon. "Fairness of a dismissal from a contractural and administrative law perspective." Thesis, Nelson Mandela Metropolitan University, 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/10948/1288.
Full textPlasket, Clive. "The fundamental right to just administrative action: judicial review of administrative action in the democratic South Africa." Thesis, Rhodes University, 2003. http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1003208.
Full textMadebwe, Tinashe Masvimbo. "Assessing the duty to exhaust internal remedies in the South African law." Thesis, Rhodes University, 2007. http://hdl.handle.net/10962/d1007253.
Full textArmstrong, Gillian Claire. "Administrative justice and tribunals in South Africa : a commonwealth comparison." Thesis, Stellenbosch : Stellenbosch University, 2011. http://hdl.handle.net/10019.1/17997.
Full textENGLISH ABSTRACT: In the field of administrative law, the judiciary has traditionally exercised control over the administrative actions of the executive through judicial review. However, judicial review is neither the most effective nor the most efficient primary control mechanism for systemic administrative improvement. In a country faced with a task of =transformative constitutionalism‘, and hindered with scarce resources, there is good cause to limit judicial intervention as the first response to administrative disputes. The major theme of this thesis is to investigate the feasibility of administrative tribunal reform in South Africa, using two other commonwealth countries, Australia and England, as a basis for comparison. Australia and England have been chosen for comparison because they share similar administrative law traditions and they can provide working models of coherent tribunal structures. The Australian tribunal system is well-established and consists of tribunals which fall under the control of the executive, while tribunals in England have recently undergone a significant transformation, and are now part of the independent judiciary. The South African government currently spends, indeed wastes, a significant amount of money on administrative law litigation. Due to the limitations of judicial review, even after the high costs of litigation and the long duration of court proceedings, the results achieved may still be unsatisfactory. Furthermore, judicial review is unsuited to giving effect to systemic administrative change and the improvement of initial decision-making. Australia and England have begun to move away from the traditional court model for the resolution of administrative disputes. Both have indicated a preference for the important role of tribunals in the administration of disputes. Tribunals have been shown to offer the advantage of being speedier, cheaper, more efficient, more participatory and more accessible than traditional courts, which contributes to tribunals being a more available resource for lay people or people without sophisticated legal knowledge, and provides wider access to remedies than courts. The English and Australian models indicate a few important trends which need to be applied universally to ensure a sustained tribunal reform and a system which provides a higher level of administrative redress than the over-burdened and institutionally inept courts currently do. These include co-operation among government departments and tribunals; open and accountable systemic change; the need for supervision and evaluation of the whole of administrative law by an independent and competent body; and ultimately a focus on the needs of users of state services. At the same time, there are arguments against administrative tribunal reform. These include the costs of reform; the ways to establish tribunals; and the level of independence shown by the tribunals. These arguments are especially relevant in the South African context, where the government faces huge social problems and a scarcity of resources. However, after an analysis of the valuable characteristics of tribunals and the role that they serve in the day to day administration of justice, it is difficult to see how these objections to tribunals can outweigh their potential importance in the administrative justice system. The need for sustained systematic reform in South Africa is one that cannot be ignored. Tribunals offer a valuable alternative to judicial review for the resolution of administrative disputes. Furthermore, the tribunal systems of Australia and England demonstrate how the effective creation and continued use of comprehensive tribunal structures contributes firstly to cost reduction and secondly to ease the administrative burden on courts who are not suited to cure large-scale administrative error.
AFRIKAANSE OPSOMMING: In die administratiefreg oefen die regsprekende gesag tradisioneel beheer uit oor die uitvoerende gesag deur middel van geregtelike hersiening. Geregtelike hersiening is egter nie die mees doeltreffende of effektiewe primêre beheermeganisme om sistemiese administratiewe verbetering teweeg te bring nie. In 'n land met die uitdagings van 'transformatiewe konstitusionalisme‘ en skaars hulpbronne, kan 'n goeie argument gevoer word dat geregtelike inmenging as die eerste antwoord op administratiewe dispute beperk moet word. Die deurlopende tema van hierdie tesis is 'n ondersoek na die lewensvatbaarheid van hervorming van administratiewe tribunale in Suid-Afrika, in vergelyking met die posisie in Australië en Engeland, waarvan beide ook, tesame met Suid-Afrika, deel vorm van die Statebond. Hierdie lande is gekies vir regsvergelykende studie aangesien hulle 'n administratiefregtelike tradisie met Suid-Afrika deel en beide werkende modelle van duidelike tribunale strukture daarstel. Die Australiese tribunale stelsel is goed gevestig en bestaan uit tribunale onder die beheer van die uitvoerende gesag, terwyl die tribunale stelsel in Engeland onlangs 'n beduidende hervorming ondergaan het en nou deel van die onafhanklike regsprekende gesag is. Die Suid-Afrikaanse regering mors aansienlike hoeveelhede geld op administratiefregtelike litigasie. Selfs na hoë koste en lang vertragings van litigasie mag die resultate steeds onbevredigend wees as gevolg van die beperkings inherent aan geregtelike hersiening. Tesame met hierdie oorwegings is geregtelike hersiening ook nie gerig op sistemiese administratiewe verandering en verbetering van aanvanklike besluitneming nie. Australië en Engeland het onlangs begin wegbeweeg van die tradisionele hof-gebaseerde model vir die oplossing van administratiewe dispute. Beide toon 'n voorkeur vir die belangrike rol wat tribunale in die administrasie van dispute kan speel Tribunale bied die bewese voordele om vinniger, goedkoper, meer doeltreffend, meer deelnemend en meer toeganklik te wees as tradisionele howe, sodat tribunale 'n meer beskikbare hulpbron is vir leke, oftewel, persone sonder gesofistikeerde regskennis en dus beter toegang tot remedies as tradisionele howe verskaf. Die Engelse en Australiese modelle dui op enkele belangrike tendense wat universeel toegepas moet word om volgehoue tribunale hervorming te verseker en om =n stelsel te skep wat 'n hoër vlak van administratiewe geregtigheid daarstel as wat oorlaaide en institusioneel onbekwame howe kan. Dit verwys bepaald na samewerking tussen staatsdepartemente en tibunale; deursigtige en verantwoordbare sistemiese veranderinge; die behoefte aan toesighouding en evaluasie van die hele administratiefreg deur 'n onafhanklike, bevoegde liggaam; en uiteindelik 'n fokus op die behoeftes van die gebruikers van staatsdienste. Daar is egter terselfdertyd ook argumente teen administratiewe tribunale hervorming. Hierdie argumente sluit in die koste van hervorming; die wyses waarop tribunale gevestig word; en die vlak van onafhanklikheid voorgehou deur tribunale. Hierdie argumente is veral relevant in die Suid-Afrikaanse konteks waar die regering voor groot sosiale probleme te staan kom en daarby ingesluit, 'n tekort aan hulpbronne ook moet hanteer. Daarenteen is dit moeilik om in te sien hoe enige teenkanting en teenargumente met betrekking tot die vestiging van administratiewe tribunale swaarder kan weeg as die potensiële belang van sulke tribunale in die administratiewe geregtigheidstelsel, veral nadat 'n analise van die waardevolle karaktereienskappe van tribunale en die rol wat hulle speel in die dag-tot-dag administrasie van geregtigheid onderneem is. Die behoefte aan volhoubare sistemiese hervorming in Suid-Afrika kan nie geïgnoreer word nie. Tribunale bied 'n waardevolle alternatief tot geregtelike hersiening met die oog op die oplossing van administratiewe dispute. Tesame hiermee demonstreer die tribunale stelsels in Australië en Engeland hoe die doeltreffende vestiging en deurlopende gebruik van omvattende tribunale bydra, eerstens om kostes verbonde aan die oplossing van administratiewe dispute te verlaag en tweedens, om die administratiewe las op die howe, wat nie aangelê is daarvoor om grootskaalse administratiewe foute reg te stel nie, te verlig.
Fletcher, John. "The courts cut out : administrative law and detention without trial in South Africa." Thesis, University of Cambridge, 1990. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.385372.
Full textMosdell, Susan Carolyn. "The role of municipalities in energy governance in South Africa." Master's thesis, University of Cape Town, 2016. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/20812.
Full textZondi, Nokulunga. "Assessing public-private-partnerships in South Africa and how administrative law should respond." Master's thesis, Faculty of Law, 2018. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/30114.
Full textSchweitzer, A. G. "Aspects of the administrative law relationship between the taxpayer and the Commissioner for Inland Revenue." Master's thesis, University of Cape Town, 1991. http://hdl.handle.net/11427/22172.
Full textThere is an administrative law relationship between the taxpayer and the Commissioner for Inland Revenue, (hereinafter referred to as 'the Commissioner') The basis of this relationship is that the Commissioner is required to collect tax and the taxpayer is required to pay the tax. In exercising his powers under the Income Tax Act No. 58 of 1962 (hereinafter referred to as the Act), the Commissioner has been conferred with discretionary powers. In this thesis, this administrative law relationship is examined with specific reference to the means of regulating the exercise by the Commissioner of his discretionary powers. There are a number of ways in which the discretionary powers of the Commissioner may be regulated. Generally discretion may be regulated by 'rule based administrative action' (1). This means that discretionary power is exercised subject to internal rules which state how discretionary power must be exercised. Another method of regulating the exercise of discretionary power is subsumed under the category of 'adjudicative techniques of decision' (2). The essence of the latter category is that the affected person participates in the decision which affects him. The exercise of discretionary power may be regulated furthermore if the Minister who has responsibility for the Department is required to be responsible for and account publicly for the actions of his subordinate. In this thesis, examples of rule based administrative action and adjudicative techniques of decision are examined.
Books on the topic "Administrative law – South Africa"
Devenish, G. E. Administrative law and justice in South Africa. Durban: Butterworths, 2001.
Find full textCloete, Jacobus Johannes Nicolaas. Accountable government and administration for the Republic of South Africa. Hatfield, Pretoria: J.L. van Schaik, 1996.
Find full textMcQuoid-Mason, David Jan, and Linda Coetzee. Street law South Africa: Practical law for South Africans : educator's manual. 2nd ed. Lansdowne [South Africa]: Juta, 2005.
Find full textLange, Claudia. Unreasonableness as a ground of judicial review in South Africa: Constitutional challenges for South Africa's administrative law : including comparative aspects of German public law. Baden-Baden: Nomos, 2002.
Find full textWorkshop on Controlling Public Power in Southern Africa (1996 Cape Town, South Africa). Administrative justice in Southern Africa: Proceedings of the Workshop on Controlling Public Power in Southern Africa held in Cape Town, South Africa, 8-11 March 1996. [Cape Town]: Dept. of Public Law, University of Cape Town, 1997.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Administrative law – South Africa"
Kemp, Gerhard. "South Africa." In Homicide in Criminal Law, 195–215. New York : Routledge, 2018. | Series: Substantive issues in criminal law: Routledge, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781351016315-12.
Full textKnobel, Johann C. "South Africa." In Tort and Insurance Law, 484–516. Vienna: Springer Vienna, 2002. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-7091-6120-3_21.
Full textTheron, Jan, and Ursula Titus. "South Africa." In International Handbook of Cooperative Law, 687–700. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-30129-2_32.
Full textSundaram, Jae. "South Africa." In Pharmaceutical Patent Protection and World Trade Law, 169–96. New York: Routledge, 2018. | Series: Routledge research in intellectual property: Routledge, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315267692-10.
Full textCollier, Debbie. "South Africa." In Ius Comparatum - Global Studies in Comparative Law, 431–56. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-90068-1_24.
Full textBright, Rachel K. "Adapting the Stereotype: Race and Administrative Control." In Chinese Labour in South Africa, 1902–10, 141–59. London: Palgrave Macmillan UK, 2013. http://dx.doi.org/10.1057/9781137316578_7.
Full textNeethling, Johann. "Punitive Damages in South Africa." In Tort and Insurance Law, 123–36. Vienna: Springer Vienna, 2009. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-211-92211-8_8.
Full textStrunz, Balthasar. "Competition Law in South Africa." In The Interface of Competition Law, Industrial Policy and Development Concerns, 143–77. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer Berlin Heidelberg, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-57627-4_5.
Full textLee, Yong-Shik. "Law and development in South Africa." In Law and Development, 88–110. Abingdon, Oxon [UK]; New York, NY: Routledge, 2018. | Series: Routledge studies in development economics; 143: Routledge, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9781315150253-5.
Full textRucell, Jessica. "Health system accountability in South Africa." In Childbirth, Vulnerability and Law, 111–31. New York : Routledge, 2019.: Routledge, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.4324/9780429443718-7.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Administrative law – South Africa"
Mostert, Sias, Mothibi Ramusi, Herman Steyn, and Martin Jacobs. "A National Pathfinder Satellite for South Africa." In 56th International Astronautical Congress of the International Astronautical Federation, the International Academy of Astronautics, and the International Institute of Space Law. Reston, Virigina: American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, 2005. http://dx.doi.org/10.2514/6.iac-05-b5.1.03.
Full textButgereit, Laurie. "Covid-19 New Cases Measurements and Benford's Law with Specific Focus on South Africa." In 2021 International Conference on Artificial Intelligence, Big Data, Computing and Data Communication Systems (icABCD). IEEE, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1109/icabcd51485.2021.9519321.
Full textНиколаев, Александр Геннадьевич, and Александр Олегович Джиоев. "ORGANIZATION OF THE ACTIVITIES OF THE POLICE UNITS OF THE REPUBLIC OF SOUTH OSSETIA TO ENSURE PUBLIC SAFETY." In Научные исследования в современном мире. Теория и практика: сборник избранных статей Всероссийской (национальной) научно-практической конференции (Санкт-Петербург, Июнь 2021). Crossref, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.37539/nitp317.2021.36.94.009.
Full textOnuoha, K. Mosto, and Chidozie I. Dim. "Prospects and Challenges of Developing Unconventional Petroleum Resources in the Anambra Inland Basin of Nigeria." In SPE/AAPG Africa Energy and Technology Conference. SPE, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.2118/afrc-2571791-ms.
Full textReports on the topic "Administrative law – South Africa"
Cachalia, Firoz, and Jonathan Klaaren. Digitalisation, the ‘Fourth Industrial Revolution’ and the Constitutional Law of Privacy in South Africa: Towards a public law perspective on constitutional privacy in the era of digitalisation. Digital Pathways at Oxford, July 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.35489/bsg-dp-wp_2021/04.
Full textCachalia, Firoz, and Jonathan Klaaren. A South African Public Law Perspective on Digitalisation in the Health Sector. Digital Pathways at Oxford, July 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.35489/bsg-dp-wp_2021/05.
Full text