Academic literature on the topic 'Adversarial proceedings'

Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles

Select a source type:

Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Adversarial proceedings.'

Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.

You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.

Journal articles on the topic "Adversarial proceedings"

1

Попова, Ирина, and Анастасия Иванова. "THE IMPLEMENTATION OF THE ADVERSARIAL PRINCIPLE AT THE PRE-TRIAL STAGES OF CRIMINAL PROCEEDINGS IN THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION AND IN FOREIGN COUNTRIES." Rule-of-law state: theory and practice 16, no. 3 (March 1, 2020): 108–19. http://dx.doi.org/10.33184/pravgos-2020.3.12.

Full text
Abstract:
To achieve the purpose of criminal proceedings, law enforcers must have an arsenal of procedural tools in order to ensure the operation of the legal regulation mechanism. The system of principles of criminal proceedings, serving as the basis for the effective operation of the norms of criminal procedure law, includes the adversarial principle. The implementation of this principle has a number of features in pre-trial proceedings. In this aspect, a comparative study of the adversarial principle in national criminal proceedings and in foreign criminal proceedings is of both scientific and practical interest. Purpose: analysis of the adversarial principle at the pre-trial stages in national and foreign criminal proceedings, as an element of the legal regulation mechanism. Methods: dialectic methods as a general scientific method of cognition, as well as specific scientific methods: interpretation method, comparative legal, technical legal, formal logical in their various combinations. Results: the study reveals that the adversarial principle operates in various types of criminal process in the mechanism of legal regulation of Russia and foreign countries. To achieve the social purpose of criminal proceedings, which provides for the protection of rights and legitimate interests, the adversarial principle must be implemented, including at the pre-trial stages of criminal proceedings.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Cvorovic, Zoran. "Contemporary reform of the criminal proceedings in the Republic of Serbia: Legal history view." Zbornik Matice srpske za drustvene nauke, no. 154 (2016): 19–36. http://dx.doi.org/10.2298/zmsdn1654019c.

Full text
Abstract:
This article aims to review some solutions in the Criminal Procedure Code (CPC) from 2011, which represents breaking with former Serbian and Yugoslav tradition in criminal proceedings. These are, primarily, novelties related to opportunism in prosecution, plea bargaining and presentation of evidence by parties that all devalue principles of material truth determination in proceedings. This work establishes connection between the aforementioned solutions of Serbian legislator and the development of continental European criminal proceeding over centuries. Comparative historical legal analysis of these norms in the Serbian CPC begins with the key turning point in the development of the continental European criminal proceedings - suppression of the adversarial system by the inquisitorial proceedings in the XVI and XVII centuries. As this change has been closely related to the transition of, up to then, dominant type of states (feudal mosaic states to absolute monarchies), these modern changes in criminal proceedings are analyzed not only from the point of view of criminal procedure evolution, but also from the point of view of the evolution of states. In England, country of origin of Anglo-Saxon civilization, the old adversarial system was not transformed into inquisitorial, contrary to the development of the continental criminal proceedings. This transformation was prevented by Puritan revolution, similarly as it prevented the transformation of English state into absolute monarchy. Continental and Anglo-Saxon criminal proceedings have developed as two completely separate systems since then. This article further elaborates some of the key criminal law traditions in continental criminal proceedings and substantive criminal law which resulted from the introduction of the inquisitorial proceedings: development of complicity and guilt as institutes, final suppression of self-representation, incrimination of false testimony and perjury. These are directly related to the active role assigned to court in inquisitorial proceedings, and to court?s obligation to determine material truth. Changes in the role of court also result from the change of states; while weak feudal states were satisfied with passive courts, powerful absolute monarchies demanded courts with active role in all phases of proceedings. Modern Americanization of some European proceeding regulations, as it is the case in Serbia, brings discontinuation in legal proceeding tradition of these states, but also, necessarily, influences regression into domination of adversarial proceedings character?ized by passive court. In continental tradition it also consequently indicates a weak state.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Striletska, Oksana. "Establishment and Development of the Adversarial Principle in the Criminal Process." Path of Science 7, no. 7 (July 31, 2021): 1010–16. http://dx.doi.org/10.22178/pos.72-2.

Full text
Abstract:
The article is devoted to studying the history of the origin and development of adversarial principles in criminal proceedings. The evolution of the adversarial principle in the criminal process is studied in chronological order, in historical retrospective. Based on the development of legal regulations and the level of public administration, specific historical periods related to the development of the adversarial principle in criminal proceedings are distinguished. A retrospective suggests that adversarial proceedings should be taken as the basis for the organization of the entire criminal process. Only in this case, it is possible to clearly separate the functions of prosecution, defence, and resolution of criminal proceedings at all its stages and give the parties equal opportunities to provide evidence and defend their positions.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Gertner, Nancy, and Joseph Sanders. "Alternatives to Traditional Adversary Methods of Presenting Scientific Expertise in the Legal System." Daedalus 147, no. 4 (October 2018): 135–51. http://dx.doi.org/10.1162/daed_a_00525.

Full text
Abstract:
The twin goals of any litigation are to arrive at a correct outcome and provide the parties with a sense that they were treated justly, even if they do not prevail. Adversarial proceedings are often perceived to be superior to inquisitorial proceedings with respect to the second goal but inferior with respect to the first. This is especially the case when proceedings involve expert testimony. In this essay, we discuss several relatively minor changes to typical adversarial processes that offer the potential of improving trial accuracy without disrupting the overall structure of adversarial proceedings. These changes include 1) alterations to the organization of the trial, including concurrent expert testimony; 2) alterations to the role of the jury, including taking notes, asking questions, and receiving written expert reports; and 3) formal expert witness codes of conduct designed to better arm experts to resist the adversarial pressures that lead to biased testimony.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Tomak, Anastasiya Ivanovna. "The prerequisites for changing the mechanism of implementation of adversarial principle as the backbone of justice in the information and communication society." Право и политика, no. 5 (May 2021): 51–59. http://dx.doi.org/10.7256/2454-0706.2021.5.35651.

Full text
Abstract:
The advancement of informatization leads to the information society, which is a global trend of information civilization. Present time marks the new information stage of social development, which should be defined as information society, where information and knowledge are the key object of labor of the majority of population, and information technologies are a direct instrument of labor. In this regard, civil proceedings, which is founded on the adversarial principle, also takes the vector towards the information component. The adversarial principle, is in turn is influenced by objective factors (social relations) and subjective factors  (attitude towards the right of subjects), which is the basis for changing the mechanism of its implementation. This directly affect the conduct of judicial proceedings and legal enforcement of adversarial principle. The author determines the key trends in adaptation of the means of implementation of adversarial principle in civil proceedings in the conditions of the use of information technologies. The author suggest dividing the means of implementation of adversarial principle into two groups: for creating an environment of trust and communication interaction between the participants and the court. Based on this, the article analyzes the possible impact of information technologies upon the adversarial principle in civil proceedings, as well as the mechanism of its implementation. The conclusion is made that the adversarial principle in civil proceedings can fall under influence of information technologies, since its essence is formed from objective and subjective factors; while the means of its implementation, which comprise the legal measures of its mechanism through adaptation of information technologies in justice, are susceptible to change.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Smith, Stanley K. "Expert testimony in adversarial legal proceedings." Population Research and Policy Review 12, no. 1 (1993): 43–52. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/bf01074508.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Burmagin, S. V. "Metamorphoses of an Adversarial Nature of Criminal Proceedings in Cases of Judicial Review." Lex Russica 1, no. 2 (February 28, 2020): 44–62. http://dx.doi.org/10.17803/1729-5920.2020.159.2.044-062.

Full text
Abstract:
An adversarial nature of any judicial proceedings, which is characteristic of justice and corresponds to its nature, is revealed in criminal proceedings not only in criminal cases, but also in so called cases of judicial review exercised during pre-trial proceedings. In the present paper the features of adversarial construction of judicial review proceedings in the Russian criminal process are investigated in the context of the purpose and subject of judicial review at pre-trial stages. The author has analyzed the specifics of the conflict relationship, the essence of the legal dispute and the subject composition of the procedural parties in cases of judicial review, as well as the peculiarities of initiating the judicial review proceedings and distribution of the burden of proof between the parties; reveals the transformation of the procedural roles of the main participants of the adversarial proceedings when the disputed issue is transfered from the main proceedings in the criminal case for consideration in the procedure of judicial review within the framework of separate proceedings. The paper also elucidates such features characteristic for certain forms of judicial review as involvement of third parties having their own interest in the judicial review case and restriction of participation in the court session of the interested party. The paper focuses on the problem of ambiguous (from the standpoint of the principle of adversariality) procedural status of the prosecutor in judicial and review proceedings in which independent parties are the investigator and (or) the head of the investigative body. Alternative options for elimination of the problem discussed above are proposed. It is concluded that in the course of normative regulation of judicial review procedures and law enforcement, it is necessary to take into account the specifics of cases of judicial review and the originality of manifestation of adversarial foundation in such cases.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Burmagin, S. V. "Problematic Issues of Adversarial Construction of Judicial Proceedings at the Stage of Execution of the Sentence." Actual Problems of Russian Law 15, no. 9 (September 29, 2020): 93–103. http://dx.doi.org/10.17803/1994-1471.2020.118.9.093-103.

Full text
Abstract:
An adversarial nature of any trial, characteristic of justice and corresponding to its nature, is manifested in criminal proceedings not only in criminal cases, but also in cases addressing issues related to the execution of the sentence. The paper examines the peculiarities of the adversarial construction of judicial proceedings at the stage of execution of the sentence pre-conditioned by the tasks and the specific subject of judicial proceedings in a particular category of cases. The author elucidates the specifics of the conflict relationship, the essence of the legal dispute and the subject composition of procedural parties in cases where issues related to the execution of punishment are resolved. Also, the author analyzes the problems of ensuring equality of the parties and the undefined role of the prosecutor at the execution stage, suggests ways to address them at the legislative level. Finally, it is concluded that there is a need to improve the procedural form of dealing with issues related to the execution of sentences in accordance with the principles of adversarial proceedings and equality and taking into account the peculiarities of their manifestations in judicial proceedings arising during the execution of the sentence.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Petrakova, S. A. "Evolution of the adversary (on the example of criminal proceedings)." Institute Bulletin: Crime, Punishment, Correction 13, no. 2 (July 19, 2019): 222–28. http://dx.doi.org/10.46741/2076-4162-2019-13-2-222-228.

Full text
Abstract:
Adversary in juridical science cannot be considered separately from the judicial system, because the changes that took place in the judicial process had an irreversible impact on the evolution of adversarial proceedings. This provision is proved in legal practice. The evolution of competition in criminal proceedings is investigated in chronological order, in historical retrospect. At the beginning of statehood when democratic principles prevailed in society, trials were based on adversarial principles, the court played the role of an impartial arbitrator, and the outcome of the case was determined by the evidence collected by the plaintiffs and defendants. In the process of strengthening of the state, the court has become an active subject of judicial investigations and by the end of the XVII century the state displaces the adversary system of trial, replacing it to prove the guilt of the accused of the results of the investigation: torture, interrogations, etc. Only in the second half of the XIX century in the proceedings returned adversary, but not for long. During the soviet period previous achievements in the field of justice were eradicated. The restoration of adversarial proceedings in legislation and judicial practice began in the early 1990s in the process of judicial reform, which was carried out in order to improve the efficiency of judicial proceedings. At present it is safe to say that the potential of the adversarial principle has not yet been sufficiently disclosed.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Misztal-Konecka, Joanna. "O OBOWIĄZYWANIU ZASADY KONTRADYKTORYJNOŚCI W POSTĘPOWANIU NIEPROCESOWYM: PRZYCZYNEK DO DYSKUSJI." Zeszyty Prawnicze 16, no. 3 (December 10, 2016): 137. http://dx.doi.org/10.21697/zp.2016.16.3.06.

Full text
Abstract:
The Adversarial Principle in Non-litigious Proceedings: a Contribution to the Discussion Summary The adversarial principle has been applicable in Polish non-litigious proceedings since 1964, when the provisions for litigious and non-litigious proceedings in Polish civil law were integrated in one civil code, and later when its procedural law was fundamentally revised and amended. Prior to this change, the applicable provisions were defined in the 1945 Code for non-litigious proceedings, which did not admit the adversary system, viz. the principle that the parties to proceedings collect evidence and produce witnesses, while the court merely assists and supervises. There are only two situations in which under current Polish civil law the inquisitorial system may supersede the adversary ststem. The two exceptions are: 1) when ex officio proceedings may be initiated on the grounds of a legislative act; and 2) when it is in the public interest to initiate an ex officio inquiry.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
More sources

Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Adversarial proceedings"

1

Abu-Baker, Ben-Younis Huda M. "Expert evidence in criminal proceedings : a comparative study (English adversarial and Libyan inquisitorial systems)." Thesis, Manchester Metropolitan University, 2005. http://ethos.bl.uk/OrderDetails.do?uin=uk.bl.ethos.420864.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Gras, Antonin. "La loyauté dans le procès administratif." Thesis, Paris 10, 2018. http://www.theses.fr/2018PA100157.

Full text
Abstract:
La loyauté procédurale n’est pas consacrée dans le droit du procès administratif. Elle fait pourtant l’objet d’un débat au sein de la doctrine publiciste. Alors que la jurisprudence judiciaire et la doctrine privatiste font de la loyauté des débats essentiellement un enjeu de moralisation du procès entre les parties, le discours de la doctrine publiciste sur la loyauté vise à révéler et justifier les garanties apportées aux parties dans le procès administratif. Une démarche inductive, consistant à systématiser le discours doctrinal, permet de formuler un concept de loyauté procédurale propre au procès administratif. Celui-ci apporte une justification à certains traits de procédure, consacrés par les textes ou la jurisprudence, qui n’ont pas de fondement exprès et dont le point commun est de reconnaître des garanties aux parties. Ce concept offre une grille d’analyse du droit du procès. La circonstance que le principe de loyauté procédurale est rejeté en droit n’exclut pas, en outre, l’intérêt d’un usage conceptuel de la loyauté. Le concept de loyauté permet d’apprécier l’opportunité de consacrer certains mécanismes contentieux et d’identifier les difficultés posées par le procès administratif selon les critères de l’intégrité, de l’accessibilité et de l’efficacité à l’égard des parties. Envisagée comme un concept d’explication, la loyauté procédurale devient un concept d’analyse de la procédure suivie devant le juge administratif et suggère certaines évolutions des règles applicables au procès administratif
The concept of procedural loyalty is not enshrined in the legal frameworks that govern administrative legal proceedings. Nonetheless, it has been subject to significant debate throughout the administrative legal doctrine. In contrast to judicial case law and civil doctrine where the concept of loyalty of debates is essentially focused on the moralization between the parties involved, the administrative doctrine on loyalty aims to disclose and justify the guaranties and safeguards given to the parties involved. An inductive approach, consistent in systematizing the doctrinal discourse, has lead to a concept of procedural loyalty that is unique to administrative legal proceedings. It provides justification over the key features of legal proceedings, features that are enshrined in either legal texts or case law but do not have explicit legal foundations and for which the common feature is to recognize safeguards afforded to the parties involved. This concept brings about a new set of legal terminology. The fact that the principal of procedural loyalty is not explicitly covered in legal frameworks, does not mean however that the conceptual usage of loyalty should be discarded. This concept allows us to acknowledge the opportunity in devoting litigation mechanisms to administrative legal proceedings, in order to identify the difficulties brought about in respect of the integrity, accessibility and efficiency with regards to all parties involved. Initially envisaged as an explanatory concept, procedural loyalty has been transformed into a conceptual analysis of the proceedings presided over by administrative judges
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Elías, Puelles Ricardo. "Not all roads lead to Rome: the Theory of the Case, its usefulness in oral litigation and a teaching proposal." THĒMIS-Revista de Derecho, 2016. http://repositorio.pucp.edu.pe/index/handle/123456789/109308.

Full text
Abstract:
In recent years, we have seen that the adversarial system has shaped the criminal process in various Latin American countries. This fact leads us to question what are the characteristics of this system, what are the benefits in comparison with the inquisitorial system and which is the method of teaching to which the different procedural actors are exposed.In this article, the author develops in a comprehensive manner the main features of the inquisitorial system and the changing paradigm in Latin American towards the adversarial system, and then explains the influence of this system on the trial lawyer. In addition, it addresses the theory of the case as a methodology that allows to adopt strategic decisions and improve the professional performance of the litigant. Finally, the author explains the necessity of an educational reform asa step in the reform of criminal proceedings.
En los últimos años, el sistema acusatorio ha ido moldeando el proceso penal en los países latinoamericanos. Ello lleva a preguntarse cuáles son las características de este sistema, cuáles son sus ventajas respecto al sistema inquisitivo y cuál es el método de enseñanza al que se ven sometidos losdiferentes actores procesales.En el presente artículo, el autor desarrolla ampliamente las principales características del sistema inquisitivo y el cambio de paradigma latinoamericanohacia el sistema acusatorio, para luego explicar la influencia de éste en el abogado litigante.También aborda la teoría del caso, una metodología que permite adoptar decisiones estratégicas y mejorar el performance profesional del litigante. Finalmente, explicará la necesaria reforma de la enseñanza como paso previo de la reforma delproceso penal.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Yebga, Hot Ange Hélène. "Contribution transdisciplinaire à la réglementation de l'Union Européenne de l'expertise du risque biologique pour la santé et l'environnement." Thesis, Normandie, 2019. http://www.theses.fr/2019NORMC008/document.

Full text
Abstract:
L’expertise du risque biologique joue un rôle central dans l’élaboration et la mise en œuvre de la politique sanitaire et environnementale au niveau de l’Union européenne. Depuis la crise dite de la « vache folle », le législateur de l’Union a reconnu la nécessité d’encadrer davantage cette expertise. Toutefois, si le droit de l’Union s’intéresse au cadre scientifique de l’expertise du risque biologique, il traite de façon lacunaire la question de son cadre juridique. En effet, si les exigences d’indépendance, d’impartialité et de transparence sont affirmées à l’égard de l’expert, leur application manque de clarté et menace à terme la protection de la santé et de l’environnement des citoyens de l’Union. Pour remédier à ce problème, cette étude propose des critères ayant pour but l’établissement d’une réglementation au niveau de l’Union de l’expertise du risque biologique. Ces critères ont été établis après l’analyse du cadre juridique existant, des modèles d’expertise issus des législations de certains Etats membres et tiers à l’Union ainsi que de contributions doctrinales
Biological risk expertise plays a central role in the development and implementation of health and environmental policy at EU level. Since the "mad cow" crisis, the Union's legislator has recognized the need to provide more guidance for this expertise. However, while EU law is concerned with the scientific framework of biological risk expertise, it does not address the issue of its legal framework in a comprehensive way. Indeed, while the requirements of independence, impartiality and transparency are affirmed with regard to the expert, their application lacks clarity and ultimately threatens the protection of the health and environment of EU citizens. To address this problem, this study proposes criteria for establishing EU-level regulation of biological risk expertise. These criteria were established after analysis of the existing legal framework, models of expertise from the legislation of certain Member States and third countries as well as doctrinal contributions
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

David, Alexia. "L'impartialité du Conseil constitutionnel." Thesis, Normandie, 2021. http://www.theses.fr/2021NORMC003.

Full text
Abstract:
L’impartialité est une exigence relative : le juge impartial n’est pas le juge dénué d’opinions, mais celui qui n’a pas encore pris parti et qui, donc, conserve sa liberté de réflexion. À l’inverse, le juge partial est celui qui a pris parti a priori, de façon prématurée et qui, de ce fait, a perdu cette liberté de réflexion. Cette définition permet d’affirmer que les juges constitutionnels français peuvent être impartiaux s’ils en ont la volonté. Néanmoins, l’impartialité n’est pas seulement affaire de volonté : le juge peut être placé dans une situation favorable ou défavorable à son impartialité. Or, le risque de partialité apparaît fort pour le juge constitutionnel. L’appréciation de la conformité de la loi aux droits et libertés garantis par la Constitution est une opération subjective, portant sur des questions complexes, mettant en conflit des valeurs et laissant donc une large place à l’expression des préjugés individuels des juges. Le risque de partialité connaît cependant certaines limites, car les juges constitutionnels disposent d’outils pour objectiver leur raisonnement et subissent un certain nombre de contraintes juridiques qui réduisent ce risque. La question de l’impartialité du Conseil constitutionnel se pose ensuite en termes de garanties d’impartialité. Or, si l’impartialité est une qualité recherchée par le Conseil, cette recherche doit être approfondie, au bénéfice de son impartialité mais aussi, plus largement de son rôle au sein de la démocratie, en tant que lieu où se discute le sens de la loi et de la Constitution
L’impartialité est une exigence relative : le juge impartial n’est pas le juge dénué d’opinions, mais celui qui n’a pas encore pris parti et qui, donc, conserve sa liberté de réflexion. À l’inverse, le juge partial est celui qui a pris parti a priori, de façon prématurée et qui, de ce fait, a perdu cette liberté de réflexion. Cette définition permet d’affirmer que les juges constitutionnels français peuvent être impartiaux s’ils en ont la volonté. Néanmoins, l’impartialité n’est pas seulement affaire de volonté : le juge peut être placé dans une situation favorable ou défavorable à son impartialité. Or, le risque de partialité apparaît fort pour le juge constitutionnel. L’appréciation de la conformité de la loi aux droits et libertés garantis par la Constitution est une opération subjective, portant sur des questions complexes, mettant en conflit des valeurs et laissant donc une large place à l’expression des préjugés individuels des juges. Le risque de partialité connaît cependant certaines limites, car les juges constitutionnels disposent d’outils pour objectiver leur raisonnement et subissent un certain nombre de contraintes juridiques qui réduisent ce risque. La question de l’impartialité du Conseil constitutionnel se pose ensuite en termes de garanties d’impartialité. Or, si l’impartialité est une qualité recherchée par le Conseil, cette recherche doit être approfondie, au bénéfice de son impartialité mais aussi, plus largement de son rôle au sein de la démocratie, en tant que lieu où se discute le sens de la loi et de la Constitution
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Garinot, Jean-Marie. "Le secret des affaires." Thesis, Dijon, 2011. http://www.theses.fr/2011DIJOD007.

Full text
Abstract:
En dépit de son importance pratique, le secret des affaires n’est guère pris en compte par le droit français. Bien que mentionné par quelques textes épars, il ne peut être qualifié de notion juridique. Face aux lacunes de notre législation, les tribunaux sont contraints d’appliquer le droit commun pour protéger les informations économiques sensibles : or, l’article 1382 du Code civil, comme les textes réprimant le vol et le recel, ne sont pas adaptés. Pourtant, comme en témoignent certains systèmes juridiques étrangers, la protection du secret est nécessaire ; il convient donc d’en rechercher les fondements. Bien que justifiée, la sauvegarde des renseignements confidentiels doit toutefois être conciliée avec les autres intérêts en présence, tels que les droits particuliers à l’information, les principes directeurs du procès, la transparence financière ou encore la liberté du travail. Le but de cette étude est donc de cerner la notion de secret des affaires, puis de proposer des modalités de protection, en respectant les intérêts des tiers
Despite its practical relevance, business secrecy remains barely recognized under French law. Even if various texts refer to that concept, it cannot be considered as a legal concept under French law. In order to face the defects of our law, courts are bound to apply ordinary law to guarantee the protection of sensitive business information. However, applying article 1382 of the French civil code (torts) as well as referring to the concepts of robbery or handling (criminal law) are inappropriate solutions. Nevertheless, some foreign legal systems have demonstrated that protecting business secrecy was necessary. Therefore, our study will seek the grounds of that need for protection. Protecting confidential data, although justified, must be compatible with other key principles: individual rights to information, civil trial practice standards, financial transparency or freedom of work. Thus, the purpose of that study is to delimitate the concept of business secrecy before suggesting new measures to protect it while preserving third parties beneficiaries
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Thiam, Sangoné. "Droits de la défense et enquête policière." Thesis, Pau, 2018. http://www.theses.fr/2018PAUU2034/document.

Full text
Abstract:
La personne qui a osé porter atteinte à une valeur pénalement protégée par la société mérite-t-elle, de la part de celle-ci une quelconque défense? Pendant longtemps, cette défense a fait l'objet de controverses, si certains y étaient favorables, d'autres y étaient résolument hostiles. Le compromis a consisté à refuser les droits de la défense dans l'enquête policière en adoptant un système inquisitoire et à les consacrer largement dans la phase de jugement avec un système accusatoire. Cette mixité de la procédure semble a priori répondre aux intérêts antagonistes au cœur de la procédure pénale. Mais, à l’aune des droits fondamentaux et sous l’influence des dispositions internationales et européennes, cette conception de la procédure devient inadaptée. Les droits de la défense, droits du procès équitable, ne doivent plus faire l’objet de limitations, ils doivent gouverner toute la procédure, de l’enquête policière jusqu’à la phase de jugement. Comment des droits qui ne s’appliquaient initialement que devant une juridiction indépendante et impartiale vont-ils faire irruption dans l’enquête policière sans l’existence d’un juge présentant des garanties équivalentes à celles de la juridiction de jugement ?Si le législateur a d’abord introduit les droits de la défense dans la phase de l’instruction pénale, le déclin de cette dernière au profit de l’enquête policière devrait le pousser à procéder à leur extension. C’est ce qu’il a d’ailleurs commencé à faire, mais de manière timorée. L’effectivité des droits de la défense dans l’enquête policière nécessite non seulement de procéder à leur élargissement, mais aussi de mettre en place un juge indépendant et impartial chargé de garantir leur pleine application comme dans la phase de jugement. Une juridictionnalisation de l’enquête policière est aujourd’hui un impératif
Did the person who dared to infringe a value criminally protected by the society deserve any defense from that latter? This defence has been controversial for a long time, while some have been in favor, others have been resolutely hostile. The compromise consisted in refusing the rights of the defense in the police investigation by adopting an inquisitorial system and devoting them largely in the judgment phase with an adversarial system. This diversity of the procedure seems a priori to answer the conflicting interests at the heart of the criminal proceedings. But in the light of fundamental rights and under the influence of international and European provisions, this conception of procedure becomes inappropriate. The rights of the defense, as well as the rights to fair trial must no longer be limited, they must govern the entire procedure from the police investigation to the trial stage. How would rights that initially applied only before an independent and impartial jurisdiction break into the police investigation without the existence of a judge providing guarantees equivalent to those of the trial court? If the legislator first introduced the rights of defense in the criminal investigation phase, the decline of the latter in favor of the police investigation should push him to extend them. In fact, this is what he has started to do, but in a timorous way. Not only does the effectiveness of the rights of the defense in the police investigation require to be enlarged, but it also allows putting in place an independent and impartial judge responsible for ensuring their full implementation as in the trial stage. A jurisdictionalization of the police investigation is now a requirement
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Coulibaly, Ibrahima. "Les droits de la défense en droit mauritanien." Thesis, Paris 8, 2018. http://www.theses.fr/2018PA080008.

Full text
Abstract:
L’universalisme des droits a fait accéder au concept des droits de la défense des diversités procédurales. Au niveau de chaque pays, qu’il soit petit ou grand, quelle que soit sa culture, il est accepté et officiel qu’on ne peut juger sans se référer aux règles fondamentales, et sans se faire assister par un avocat. Les droits à la défense sont garantis en Mauritanie par la loi n° 2007-036 portant approbation d'un Code de Procédure Pénale, la loi n° 2007- 012 portant l'Organisation Judiciaire et la loi n° 99-035 portant code de Procédure Civile Commerciale et Administrative. Les règles des droits de la défense ne peuvent être atteintes sans la mise en place d’organes qui encadrent les dispositions de celle-ci. L’égalité devant la Justice est expressément considérée de droit fondamental dans la constitution du 20 juillet 1991. Cependant, le principe n'ait aucune portée réelle malgré la précision du texte. Ce qui paraît absurde avec notre modèle de système de « droit ineffectif », implique, que les règles du procès équitable ne sont pas affectées de manière égalitaire à tous. Ce n’est pas la seule difficulté ou ambigüité. La présente étude soutient, d’une part, que l’exercice des principes du contradictoire et de l’égalité des armes garantit l’effectivité des droits de la défense, et d’autre part, que le développement des principes participe à un renouveau des droits. La position contemporaine des droits de la défense emploie cette notion, démontrant souvent les droits de la défense comme une implication supérieure et d’une évidence logique de la procédure, obéissant donc aux critères fondamentaux du droit à un procès équitable. Il se détermine par toute une série de procédures menées dans un procès et se déclare, aujourd’hui, sous un ensemble de bases juridiques protégeant les droits de la défense. Pour ce faire nous avons essayé de faire un travail d’évaluation sociologique sans prétention de scientificité parfaite. Evitant tout juridisme ou positivisme, le travail reste néanmoins à dominance juridique
Universalism of the rights have come the concept the rights of the defenses diversity of procedural. A the level of each country, however big or small, whatever is its culture, he (It) is accepted and official that we cannot judge without referring to the fundamental rules (rulers), and without being attended by a lawyer. Rights of defence are guaranteed in Mauritanie by the law number 2007-036 carrying Code of criminal procedure, the law number 2007-012 carrying the judicial organization, the law number 99–035 carrying Code of civil procedure, commercial and administrative. The rules of rights of defence not wind not to be reached without the implementation of organs which frame the capacities of this one. The equality before the courts is expressly considered by fundamental law in the of the constitution owed July 20th, 1991. However, the principle is of no real reach in spite of the precision of the text. What seems absurd with our model of system of ineffective right, imply that the rules of the fair trial are not allocated in a egalitarian way to all. It is not the only difficulty or the ambiguity. The present study supports on one hand that the exercice of the equality of the contradictory and the equality of weapons guarantees the effectiveness of rights of defence, and on the other hand, that the development of the principles participates in a revival oo the rights.The contemporary position of rights of defence uses this notion demonstrating, often rights of defence as a superior implication and of a logical obvious fact of the procedure, thus obeying the fundamental criteria of the right to fair trial. He is determined by a whole series of procedures led in a trial and declares itself, today, under a set of legal bases protecting rights of defence. To this end we had tried to make a work of unpretentious sociological evaluation of perfect scientificity. Avoiding any legalism or positivism, the work stays nevertheless in legal dominance
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Lestrade, Éric. "Les principes directeurs du procès dans la jurisprudence du Conseil Constitutionnel." Thesis, Bordeaux 4, 2013. http://www.theses.fr/2013BOR40033/document.

Full text
Abstract:
Malgré le peu de fondements écrits consacrés à la justice dans le texte de la Constitution du 4 octobre 1958, le Conseil constitutionnel, en réalisant un travail d’actualisation à partir de la Déclaration des droits de l’homme et du citoyen, a permis l’émergence d’un droit constitutionnel processuel, construit autour de principes directeurs. Ceux-ci peuvent être répartis dans trois catégories : deux principales, selon que l’acteur du procès prioritairement concerné soit le juge ou les parties et une troisième, complémentaire, celle des garanties procédurales, permettant de favoriser les qualités essentielles du juge et de contrôler le respect des droits des parties. Une gradation des exigences du Conseil constitutionnel est discrètement perceptible entre les deux premières catégories de principes, plus facilement identifiable entre celles-ci et la dernière famille. Cette échelle décroissante de « densité » des principes directeurs du procès témoigne d’une véritable politique jurisprudentielle en matière de droit constitutionnel processuel, qui met l’accent sur l’accès au juge, doté des qualités indispensables à l’accomplissement de sa mission juridictionnelle. Toutefois, aussi satisfaisante que soit l’action du juge constitutionnel français à l’égard du droit du procès, celle-ci nécessiterait aujourd’hui le relais du constituant, afin de moderniser le statut constitutionnel de la justice
In spite of a relatively low number of written dispositions dedicated to justice inside of the body of the Constitution of October 1958 4th, the constitutional Council, while updating this text through the Declaration of Human Rights, contributed to the development of a procedural constitutional law, which is structured around guiding principles. Those principles can be classified within three different categories : two major categories depend on the trial actor that is primarily concerned, either the judge or the parties; a third and additional category pertaining to procedural protections, fosters the essential qualities of the judge and secure the protection of the parties’ rights. A gradation of the requirements of the constitutional Council is discreetly perceptible between the first two categories of principles, and more easily identifiable between those first two categories and the last one. This decreasing scale of “density” yoked to the trial guiding principles highlights a genuine judicial policy when it comes to procedural constitutional law, emphasizing access to the judge, whom is given essential qualities in order to achieve its judicial duty. However, the action of the French constitutional judge, as satisfactory as it is towards the rights of the trial, would easily support the intervention of the constituent power in order to update Justice’s constitutional status
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Jobert, Sylvain. "La connaissance des actes du procès civil par les parties." Thesis, Paris 2, 2016. http://www.theses.fr/2016PA020070.

Full text
Abstract:
En procédure civile, la connaissance des actes du procès par les parties est essentielle ; des garanties importantes y sont attachées, à commencer par le respect du principe du contradictoire. Une difficulté se pose, toutefois : il est malaisé de déterminer si une partie a eu connaissance de l’acte qui lui a été communiqué. Toute la question est alors de savoir comment le droit s’accommode de cette difficulté. À cette fin, deux modèles contraires peuvent être dégagés. Dans le premier, formaliste, il est fait le choix de favoriser la connaissance des actes du procès par les parties en amont, pour pouvoir se désintéresser de leur connaissance effective en aval, tous les moyens ayant été mis en oeuvre pour y parvenir. Dans le second, réaliste, on se désintéresse de la façon dont les actes du procès sont portés à la connaissance des parties, mais, par la suite, on prête beaucoup d’intérêt à la connaissance que les parties en ont réellement eue. L’étude révèle que le droit du procès civil reposait initialement sur un modèle à dominante formaliste, mais que ce modèle a évolué, particulièrement au cours des dix dernières années. Sous l’influence des soucis contemporains de rationalisation des coûts de la justice et de protection accrue des droits fondamentaux des parties, le formalisme du droit du procès civil s’est tempéré. Faudrait-il qu’il le soit davantage ? Ce travail ne plaide ni pour la subversion du modèle classique, ni pour son rétablissement. Plutôt, c’est une évolution nuancée du droit qui est suggérée, proposant d’exalter le formalisme lorsque la sécurité juridique l’exige, sans renoncer à tirer profit de règles l’atténuant quand cela s’impose
In civil law procedures, the parties’ knowledge of the acts of the trial is essential; it guarantees that certain principles, such as the adversarial principle, will be respected. However, a difficulty arises: it is hard to determine whether a party has in fact become aware of the act which was communicated to him. The question is to determine whether the law can accept such a difficulty. To this end, two divergent models can be provided. In the formalistic one, the choice is made to favor the knowledge of the acts of the trial beforehand, in order to be able to become disinterested in their actual knowledge afterwards, all the means having been implemented to carry this out. In the realistic one, the way in which the acts of the trial are brought to the parties' attention is neglected, but thereafter, there is a resurgent focus on the knowledge the parties have genuinely had. The study reveals that the law of civil trial was initially based on a predominantly formalistic model, but this model has evolved, especially during the last decade. Under the influence of contemporary concerns in order to rationalize justice costs and increase the protection of the parties' fundamental rights, the formalism of civil lawsuit has been tempered. Should it be even more moderate? This work neither pleads for the subversion of the classical model nor for its reinstatement. Instead, it is a nuanced evolution of the law which is suggested. It suggests to promote formalism when legal certainty requires it, without sacrificing the benefit of lightening the rules when it is necessary
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Books on the topic "Adversarial proceedings"

1

Jayatilake, P. W. Criminal law, the Courts of First Instance, magistrate's court practice: Adversarial procedure in outline. Kadawatha: P.W. Jayatilake, 2009.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Criminal law, the Courts of First Instance, magistrate's court practice: Adversarial procedure in outline. Kadawatha: P.W. Jayatilake, 2009.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Native Title Legal Practitioners' Workshop (1997 Canberra, A.C.T.). Working with the Native Title Act: Alternatives to the adversarial method : proceedings from a workshop held 4-5 June 1997, Native Title Research Unit, AIATSIS, Canberra. Canberra: Native Title Research Unit, 1998.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Ignaz, Stegmiller. Part V Fairness and Expeditiousness of ICC Proceedings, 35 Confirmation of Charges. Oxford University Press, 2015. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198705161.003.0035.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter assesses the judicial efficiency of the ICC’s confirmation of charges proceedings. It reviews existing jurisprudence and addresses aspects of the adversarial nature of the proceedings, including disclosure and other procedural issues. It examines the impact of current practice on pre-trial preparation, the conduct of trials, and the overall duration of ICC proceedings. Particular emphasis is placed on the relationship between pre-trial and trial proceedings, including analysis of the post-confirmation modification of legal characterizations (Regulation 55 of the Regulations of the Court) and its importance for the design of the confirmation phase. The chapter concludes that future confirmation hearings and amendments should focus on judicial efficiency and the limited purpose of the hearing, which is submitting charges on trial or denying a confirmation on the basis of a considerably low legal threshold.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Wijffels, Alain. Civil Procedural Law, the Judiciary, and Legal Professionals. Edited by Heikki Pihlajamäki, Markus D. Dubber, and Mark Godfrey. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oxfordhb/9780198785521.013.28.

Full text
Abstract:
In civil law courts, early modern civil procedure was based on the Roman-canonical model of proceedings originally developed in late medieval ecclesiastical courts and by academic scholarship. Its main features were the principle of party disposition and its corollary, the adversarial principle. These features also governed to a large extent English common law proceedings in civil litigation. The new secular and ecclesiastical social elites emerging in urban environments from the late eleventh century onwards rejected traditional forms of procedures because they perceived them as arbitrary. Early modern political developments tended to reorganize the courts’ systems in a polity under the authority of the sovereign, but in most territories, a patchwork of courts remained in place. The fundamental structure of civil proceedings remained by and large in place in the system of national courts established from the late eighteenth and early nineteenth century onwards.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Working with the Native Title Act: Alternatives to the adversarial method : Proceedings from a workshop held 4-5 June 1997, Native Title Research Unit, AIATSIS, Canberra. Native Title Research Unit, 1998.

Find full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

William A, Schabas. Part 5 Investigation and Prosecution: Enquête Et Poursuites, Art.54 Duties and powers of the Prosecutor with respect to investigations/Devoirs et pouvoirs du procureur en matière d’enquêtes. Oxford University Press, 2016. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198739777.003.0059.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter comments on Article 54 of the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court. Article 54 sets out the powers and duties of the Prosecutor with respect to investigations. Article 54 is an effort to strike the balance, to ‘build a bridge between the adversarial common law approach to the role of the Prosecutor and the role of the investigating judge in certain civil law systems’. Paragraph 1 sets out the ‘duties’ of the Prosecutor, whereas paragraphs 2 and 3 discuss the ‘powers’. Although the ‘powers’ refer specifically to the investigative phase, the nature of the duties suggests that they apply to the work of the Prosecutor overall, whatever the stage of proceedings.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Stark, Alastair. Logics for Action and Conventional Wisdom. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198831990.003.0008.

Full text
Abstract:
This chapter examines the logics for action that inquiry actors bring into a lesson-learning episode. Logics for action is a term that describes the knowledge-related preferences that actors use in inquiries to make decisions. Analysis of the logics in these cases leads to three specific arguments. First, that political logics for action do not compromise inquiries in the ways which inquiry research currently suggests. Second, that public-managerial logics are essential to inquiry success in terms of policy learning. Finally, that legal-judicial logics need not necessarily lead to blaming and adversarial proceedings, which derail the lesson-learning function. These three arguments once again suggest that we need to rethink much of the conventional wisdom surrounding inquiries.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

van Kempen, PHPHMC. The Right to Fair Preliminary Investigation and Trial for Vulnerable Defendants. Oxford University Press, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/oso/9780198788478.003.0011.

Full text
Abstract:
Mainly as a result of the nature of criminal procedure in the Netherlands, which until recently could be characterized as a modern moderate inquisitorial system, the fitness-to- plead principle has been rather underdeveloped here. This chapter analyses how the European Convention on Human Rights, EU Directives, and the increase of adversarial elements in an originally inquisitorial criminal justice system are now catalysing the fitness-to-plead principle. Fourteen recommendations will be provided for what is considered a necessary reinforcement of the legal position of defendants who possess insufficient abilities to adequately participate during criminal proceedings—both preliminary investigation and trial—or who are even unfit to stand trial. The recommendations are based on a detailed analyses of criminal procedure law of the Netherlands, case law of the European Court of Human Rights, and several EU Directives that are relevant for the fitness to plead principle..
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Book chapters on the topic "Adversarial proceedings"

1

Loo, N. L., Y. S. Chiew, C. P. Tan, G. Arunachalam, A. M. Ralib, and M. B. Mat-Nor. "Generative Adversarial Network in Reconstructing Asynchronous Breathing Cycle." In IFMBE Proceedings, 23–34. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-65092-6_3.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Yang, Yulin, and Guoquan Huang. "Map-Based Localization Under Adversarial Attacks." In Springer Proceedings in Advanced Robotics, 775–90. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-28619-4_54.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Fan, Wenqi, Yao Ma, Han Xu, Xiaorui Liu, Jianping Wang, Qing Li, and Jiliang Tang. "Deep Adversarial Canonical Correlation Analysis." In Proceedings of the 2020 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, 352–60. Philadelphia, PA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611976236.40.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Mertikopoulos, Panayotis, Christos Papadimitriou, and Georgios Piliouras. "Cycles in Adversarial Regularized Learning." In Proceedings of the Twenty-Ninth Annual ACM-SIAM Symposium on Discrete Algorithms, 2703–17. Philadelphia, PA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611975031.172.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Basilico, Nicola, and Stefano Carpin. "Balancing Unpredictability and Coverage in Adversarial Patrolling Settings." In Springer Proceedings in Advanced Robotics, 762–77. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-44051-0_44.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Liu, Yubo, Yihua Luo, Qiaoming Deng, and Xuanxing Zhou. "Exploration of Campus Layout Based on Generative Adversarial Network." In Proceedings of the 2020 DigitalFUTURES, 169–78. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-33-4400-6_16.

Full text
Abstract:
AbstractThis paper aims to explore the idea and method of using deep learning with a small amount sample to realize campus layout generation. From the perspective of the architect, we construct two small amount sample campus layout data sets through artificial screening with the preference of the specific architects. These data sets are used to train the ability of Pix2Pix model to automatically generate the campus layout under the condition of the given campus boundary and surrounding roads. Through the analysis of the experimental results, this paper finds that under the premise of effective screening of the collected samples, even using a small amount sample data set for deep learning can achieve a good result.
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Wiem, Grina, and Douik Ali. "Automatic Facial Expression Neutralisation Using Generative Adversarial Network." In Proceedings of the International Neural Networks Society, 3–12. Cham: Springer International Publishing, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-80568-5_1.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Liu, Qingyun, Feng Zhang, Mugang Lin, and Ying Wang. "Portrait Style Transfer with Generative Adversarial Networks." In Proceedings of the 9th International Conference on Computer Engineering and Networks, 375–82. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-3753-0_36.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Ding, Rui, Guibing Guo, Xiaochun Yan, Bowei Chen, Zhirong Liu, and Xiuqiang He. "BiGAN: Collaborative Filtering with Bidirectional Generative Adversarial Networks." In Proceedings of the 2020 SIAM International Conference on Data Mining, 82–90. Philadelphia, PA: Society for Industrial and Applied Mathematics, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1137/1.9781611976236.10.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Wang, Zhe, and Hongpeng Yin. "A Method of Semantic Image Inpainting with Generative Adversarial Networks." In Proceedings of 2018 Chinese Intelligent Systems Conference, 61–69. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-13-2291-4_7.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles

Conference papers on the topic "Adversarial proceedings"

1

Wang, William Yang, Sameer Singh, and Jiwei Li. "Deep Adversarial Learning for." In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North. Stroudsburg, PA, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.18653/v1/n19-5001.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
2

Song, Congzheng, Alexander Rush, and Vitaly Shmatikov. "Adversarial Semantic Collisions." In Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). Stroudsburg, PA, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.emnlp-main.344.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
3

Bose, Avishek Joey, Huan Ling, and Yanshuai Cao. "Adversarial Contrastive Estimation." In Proceedings of the 56th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). Stroudsburg, PA, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.18653/v1/p18-1094.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
4

Adams, Oliver, Matthew Wiesner, Shinji Watanabe, and David Yarowsky. "Massively Multilingual Adversarial Speech Recognition." In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North. Stroudsburg, PA, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.18653/v1/n19-1009.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
5

Romanov, Alexey, Anna Rumshisky, Anna Rogers, and David Donahue. "Adversarial Decomposition of Text Representation." In Proceedings of the 2019 Conference of the North. Stroudsburg, PA, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2019. http://dx.doi.org/10.18653/v1/n19-1088.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
6

Pereira, Lis, Xiaodong Liu, Fei Cheng, Masayuki Asahara, and Ichiro Kobayashi. "Adversarial Training for Commonsense Inference." In Proceedings of the 5th Workshop on Representation Learning for NLP. Stroudsburg, PA, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.18653/v1/2020.repl4nlp-1.8.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
7

Subramanian, Sandeep, Sai Rajeswar, Francis Dutil, Chris Pal, and Aaron Courville. "Adversarial Generation of Natural Language." In Proceedings of the 2nd Workshop on Representation Learning for NLP. Stroudsburg, PA, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.18653/v1/w17-2629.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
8

Kim, Juho, Christopher Malon, and Asim Kadav. "Teaching Syntax by Adversarial Distraction." In Proceedings of the First Workshop on Fact Extraction and VERification (FEVER). Stroudsburg, PA, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.18653/v1/w18-5512.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
9

Hoshen, Yedid, and Lior Wolf. "Non-Adversarial Unsupervised Word Translation." In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Stroudsburg, PA, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.18653/v1/d18-1043.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
10

Alzantot, Moustafa, Yash Sharma, Ahmed Elgohary, Bo-Jhang Ho, Mani Srivastava, and Kai-Wei Chang. "Generating Natural Language Adversarial Examples." In Proceedings of the 2018 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. Stroudsburg, PA, USA: Association for Computational Linguistics, 2018. http://dx.doi.org/10.18653/v1/d18-1316.

Full text
APA, Harvard, Vancouver, ISO, and other styles
We offer discounts on all premium plans for authors whose works are included in thematic literature selections. Contact us to get a unique promo code!

To the bibliography