Academic literature on the topic 'Adversative conjunction'
Create a spot-on reference in APA, MLA, Chicago, Harvard, and other styles
Consult the lists of relevant articles, books, theses, conference reports, and other scholarly sources on the topic 'Adversative conjunction.'
Next to every source in the list of references, there is an 'Add to bibliography' button. Press on it, and we will generate automatically the bibliographic reference to the chosen work in the citation style you need: APA, MLA, Harvard, Chicago, Vancouver, etc.
You can also download the full text of the academic publication as pdf and read online its abstract whenever available in the metadata.
Journal articles on the topic "Adversative conjunction"
1
Shirazi, Masoumeh A., and Seyed Mohammad Mousavi Nadoushani. "The Locus of Adversative Conjunctions in the Research Articles." SAGE Open 7, no. 1 (January 2017): 215824401770094. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/2158244017700946.
Full textAbstract:
This study is an endeavor to find how English native and nonnative EFL/ESL (English as foreign language/English as second language) writers use adversative conjunctions to connect ideas together so that texts have both coherence and cohesion. Regarding the problems nonnative writers of EFL face when composing a piece of writing, we attempted a qualitative study through compiling a stack of 200 articles written by the two groups. The research design concerned the content analysis of research articles and descriptive statistics showing the frequency of occurrences of modals in the data. The findings indicated that the number of proper and correction adversatives exceeded those of contrastive and dismissal; the statistically significant difference between two groups lay in the use of proper and correction adversative conjunction, whereas the two groups showed little or no difference in the usage of contrastive or dismissal adversatives. These findings can help material writers, EFL/ESL teachers, and learners to appreciate the significant roles adversative conjunctions play in writing.
2
Kapatsinski, Vsevolod. "Adversative conjunction choice in Russian (no, da, odnako): Semantic and syntactic influences on lexical selection." Language Variation and Change 21, no. 2 (July 2009): 157–73. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0954394509990068.
Full textAbstract:
AbstractThis article presents a multivariate analysis of adversative conjunction choice (among no, da, and odnako) in Russian, drawing implications for sentence production and semantic theory. The two main factors shown to influence conjunction choice are the types of the conjoined constituents and the semantic subtype of the adversative relation. One of the conjunctions, da, is favored when the conjoined elements are of different syntactic types and disfavored when they are of the same type, which is argued to suggest that the conjunction is chosen at a point in sentence production when the types of both of the conjoined constituents are known (Uryson, 2006). In addition, the conjunction da is heavily favored by the “preventive” adversative meaning (Sannikov, 1989:177; Serebrjanaja, 1976), as in I would go but I don't have the money. This quantitative meaning-construction association is argued to support the view that the preventive adversative is a distinct semantic subtype of adversativity (Payne, 1985; contra Foolen, 1991:84).
3
Rutten, Gijsbert. "From adverb to conjunction and back." Diachronica 29, no. 3 (October 10, 2012): 301–25. http://dx.doi.org/10.1075/dia.29.3.02rut.
Full textAbstract:
In late Middle Dutch, the temporal adverb dan “then” grammaticalized into an adversative coordinator (“but”), which remained in use up to the nineteenth century. This paper investigates how adversative dan can be deduced from earlier usages and why it later disappeared. The paper’s first part discusses how temporal dan developed an exclusive function (“except”), from which the adversative use is derived. Semantic maps are used to represent the development, and to make clear similarities and differences with German and English cognates of dan (dann/denn and than/then respectively). The second part reports corpus studies of seventeenth and eighteenth-century letters and diaries, showing text type and frequency effects on the use of adversative dan, which led to its disappearance. This will be interpreted as a peculiar case of degrammaticalization, lacking semantic enrichment and syntactic flexibilization which normally accompany degrammaticalization. The case of dan suggests that text type and frequency are important factors in (de)grammaticalization.
4
Rini, Elizabeth Ika Hesti Aprilia Nindia. "Kuseni Conjunction in Japanese Language." IZUMI 9, no. 1 (June 1, 2020): 104–11. http://dx.doi.org/10.14710/izumi.9.1.104-111.
Full textAbstract:
Kuseni is a a conjunction used to connect contradicting clauses which is called gyakusetsu no setsuzokushi in Japanese. This study aims to determine how the structure and meaning of kuseni conjunction is in Japanese sentences. The method used in this research is qualitative descriptive research. Kuseni is an adversative conjunction that connects contradictory clauses that contain criticism or reproach. Kuseni can be in the middle and at the end of a sentence, and can be attached to the class of verbs, nouns and adjectives in a sentence.
5
SCHWENTER, SCOTT A. "Discourse markers and the PA/SN distinction." Journal of Linguistics 38, no. 1 (March 2002): 43–69. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/s0022226701001232.
Full textAbstract:
Many languages have two types of adversative sentence conjunctions (e.g. Spanish, German). These are normally referred to as PA and SN conjunctions. However, while PA conjunctions can be used as discourse markers (DMs) in dialogal discourse, SN conjunctions such as those found in Spanish and German cannot be used in dialogues. Thus the PA/SN distinction does not extend fully to the dialogal realm. Using data from another Spanish DM, I argue that the PA/SN distinction can be extended beyond the monologal realm of sentence conjunction to the realm of adversative discourse markers employed in dialogal discourse. The findings have implications for the question of functional equivalence across different types of discourse.
6
Seagal, K. Ya. "RUSSIAN ADVERSATIVE CONJUNCTION «ZATO» (“BUT”) AND AXIOLOGICAL STYLISTICS (ON THE MATERIAL OF M.A. SHOLOKHOV’S NOVELS)." Bulletin of Udmurt University. Series History and Philology 30, no. 2 (May 7, 2020): 212–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.35634/2412-9534-2020-30-2-212-220.
Full textAbstract:
The article focuses on the Russian adversative conjunction «zato» (“but”) as an axiological marker and its stylistically significant use in M.A. Sholokhov’s novels «And quiet flows the Don» and «Virgin soil upturned». The article also puts forward the concept of «axiological stylistics». It is noted that axiological stylistics describes the techniques which facilitate the participation of evaluation linguistic units in the expression of certain expressive intentions. It is shown that in M.A. Sholokhov’s novels «And quiet flows the Don» and «Virgin soil upturned» the adversative conjunction «zato» (“but”) is used as a polysemous function word, and the most productive semantics of compensation involves switching of evaluation both from «-» to «+» and from «+» to «-», although the first evaluation model prevails. Based on this semantics alone, the adversative conjunction «zato» (“but”) participates in the creation of six techniques of axiological stylistics.
7
Silvennoinen, Olli O. "From constructions to functions and back: Contrastive negation in English and Finnish." Folia Linguistica 54, no. 1 (April 26, 2020): 45–87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/flin-2020-2027.
Full textAbstract:
AbstractThis is a comparative investigation of contrastive negation in English and Finnish, i. e. combinations of a negated and an affirmed part construed as alternatives to one another. In both languages, there are several constructions that express contrastive negation, but their division of labour remains unclear. The aims of the paper are two-fold: first, to see what constructional strategies are available for contrastive negation in the two languages and, second, to see how the strategies are motivated by its interactional functions. In English, contrastive negation may be expressed by using the adversative conjunction but correctively (e. g. It’s not the bikers but the other vehicle on the road), whereas standard Finnish has a specialised corrective conjunction vaan alongside the adversative mutta. Moreover, many constructions can express contrastive negation, including ones without a conjunction (e. g. It’s not the bikers, it’s the other vehicle on the road). An analysis of conversational data shows that English favours constructions without conjunctions, while in Finnish constructions both with and without conjunctions are frequent. The uses of contrastive negation are divided into reactive and non-reactive. The pragmatic functions largely explain the usage patterns, and these in turn can explain the cross-linguistic regularities of corrective conjunctions.
8
Tran Thi, Tham. "A QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH OF PARENTING STYLE TO PRESCHOOL CHILDREN." Journal of Science Educational Science 65, no. 12 (December 2020): 148–54. http://dx.doi.org/10.18173/2354-1075.2020-0119.
Full textAbstract:
This study adopted a mixed method integrating corpus techniques and error analysis to investigate Vietnamese EFL learners’ use of conjunction in English writing. The participants were ten-graders of a Hanoi-based high school. The results showed that additive and causal conjunctions were the most frequently used types, and the students encountered challenges mostly in using adversative and causal conjunctions. Besides, omission and misformation are the most common types of errors in the learners’ use of conjunction. Both interference from first language and intra-lingual factors were found to be the sources of the learners’ errors. Finally, several implications for teaching and learning conjunctions in Vietnamese high school context were drawn.
9
Фролова, Ю. И., and Л. Н. Лунькова. "Lexical-Syntactical Oppositivity as a Tool of Expressing Evaluation in a Literary Text (on the basis of a short story “The Butterfly and the Tank” by E. Hemingway)." Иностранные языки в высшей школе, no. 2(53) (September 17, 2020): 32–38. http://dx.doi.org/10.37724/rsu.2020.53.2.023.
Full textAbstract:
В статье рассматривается взаимообусловленность категорий оценки и оценочности в рамках функционально-семантического анализа художественного текста на материале рассказа Э. Хемингуэя “The Butterfly and the Tank” («Мотылёк и танк»). Феномен оценки исследуется в контексте противительных средств его реализации. Особое внимание уделяется выявлению потенциала оценочности различных противительных единиц лексико-синтаксического уровня, а также роли оценочных конструкций в манифестации авторского замысла. В результате исследования установлено, что противительный союз but, включающий в себя гипотетическую оценку, наряду с противительным союзом and, усиливают оценочность в сочетании с такими элементами лексической противительности, как прямые и контекстуальные антонимы, конструкции-интенсификаторы, средства художественной выразительности (эпитеты, метафоры и т. д.). Выявлено, что противопоставления с союзом and характеризуются меньшей частотностью употребления в сравнении с конструкциями, маркированными союзом but. Причиной этого является очевидное доминирование в этом союзе присоединительной семантики над противительной. Кроме того, выявлено, что противопоставления с различными противительными союзами, дополненные элементами лексической противительности, выражают оценочность в тех случаях, когда этого требует идейное содержание текста. Они интенсифицируют художественную выразительность произведения, подчеркивая основные смыслообразующие оппозиции на уровне образов-символов. The article discusses the interconditionality of the assessment and evaluation categories within the framework of functional-semantic analysis of a literary text. The assessment phenomenon is examined in the context of oppositive means of its realization. Particular attention is given to the detection of evaluation potential of various oppositive units on the lexico-syntactical level as well as to the role of evaluation constructions in the author’s message manifestation. The study establishes that the adversative conjunction but, including hypothetical assessment, along with the adversative conjunction and increase evaluation, together with such elements of lexical oppositivity as direct and contextual antonyms, intensifying constructions, expressive means (epithets, metaphors etc.). It is revealed that oppositions with the conjunction and are characterized by a lower frequency of use compared to constructions, marked with the conjunction but. This is explained by the obvious domination of conjunctive semantics over the oppositive one in the semantic tissue of the conjunction. The study also establishes that oppositions with various adversative conjunctions, supplemented with elements of lexical oppositivity, express evaluation in those cases, when the artistic idea requires it. They intensify the artistic expressiveness of a literary work, emphasizing the main meaningful oppositions on the level of symbolicimages. The paper examines the short story “The Butterfly and the Tank” by E. Hemingway.
10
Sipayung, Kammer Tuahman, Syahron Lubis, Edi Setia, and Roswita Silalahi. "Explicitation and Implicitation of Conjuctive Relation in Target Text of Principle Language Learning and Teaching(PLLT)." IJELTAL (Indonesian Journal of English Language Teaching and Applied Linguistics) 2, no. 1 (December 1, 2017): 83. http://dx.doi.org/10.21093/ijeltal.v2i1.66.
Full textAbstract:
Explicitation, implicitation and meaning change are the kinds of cohesion shift which is the important topic to investigate in translation. The confirmation of explicitation and implicitation translation process and its devices that is adopt by Noor Cholis and Yusi Avianto Pareanom in translating conjuction activites between sentences and clauses from English (ST) to Bahasa (TT). The data of this research are several conjuction which is appear in every chapter from Principle of Language Learning Language. To prove the hypothesis of explicitation based on Blum-Kulka (1986) is also the aim of this research then the analysis about conjuntive relation is done based on Haliday and Hasan (1976). The result of this reaserach shown us that 1) The hypotheis is positive or the portion of explicitation is bigger (63,52%), Implicitation (28,93%), meaning change (7,54%). 2) Addition is 16 devices and omision 24 devices of conjuction are adopted by the translator. 3) translators applied explicitated to the four types of conjuction such as: additive (39,60% ), adversative (26,73% ), causal (10,89% ) and temporal (22,77%) and implicitated to the four types of conjuction additive (26,08% ), adversative (39,13% ), causal (23,91% ) and temporal (10,86%) while the meaning change on additive (66,66% ), adversative (33,33% ), causal (0% ) and temporal (0%). From the finding above, it is described that additive conjunction potrayed more explicit than other and adversative conjunction more implicit than the other while additive conjunction experiences more meaning change than the other types of conjuction.
Dissertations / Theses on the topic "Adversative conjunction"
1
Silva, Tatiana Mazza da [UNESP]. "Gramaticalização de juntivos adversativos na história do português." Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/11449/86584.
Full textAbstract:
Made available in DSpace on 2014-06-11T19:22:20Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0
Previous issue date: 2010-05-18Bitstream added on 2014-06-13T18:08:02Z : No. of bitstreams: 1
silva_tm_me_sjrp.pdf: 614455 bytes, checksum: f87af5bb9f5125cb6a22b375b2431c58 (MD5)O objetivo geral desse trabalho é investigar a mudança sintático-semântico-pragmática dos juntivos porém, contudo, todavia, entretanto e no entanto, conjuntamente, sob a perspectiva da gramaticalização, a fim de buscar a comprovação da hipótese de uma trajetória do tipo advérbio > conjunção, por meio de análises contextuais que expliquem o surgimento do uso conjuncional adversativo na história do português. Adotamos, nesse trabalho, a concepção mais clássica de gramaticalização, a qual, segundo Hopper e Traugott (2003), prevê que itens lexicais podem, em determinados contextos, passar a assumir funções gramaticais ou, se já gramaticalizados, continuar a desenvolver novas funções gramaticais. Esse processo envolve pragmatização crescente de significados (mudança semântica) e recategorização do item (mudança sintática). A investigação das mudanças pelas quais passaram os itens por nós analisados baseia-se em um corpus composto de textos históricos e textos do português contemporâneo, compreendendo os períodos arcaico (século XIII a XV), moderno (XVI e XVII) e contemporâneo (XVIII a XXI). Considerando fatores de ordem semântica, sintática e pragmática na recomposição da trajetória de gramaticalização de cada um dos itens, podemos atestar que seus funcionamentos adversativo e conjuncional emergiram em diferentes momentos da história do português, fato que, no português contemporâneo, os colocam em diferentes pontos em uma escala de gramaticalização, a saber: porém > todavia, contudo > entretanto > no entanto
The aim of this dissertation is to investigate the syntactic, semantic, pragmatic change of the juntives porém, contudo, todavia, entretanto and no entanto under the perspective of grammaticalization in order to search for the evidence of the hypothesis of a trajectory of the kind adverb > conjunction through contextual analysis which can explain the origin of the adversative use as a conjunction in the history of Portuguese. We adopted, in this paper, the most classical concept of grammaticalization, which, according to Hopper and Traugott (2003), foresees that lexical items can, in some contexts, assume grammatical functions or continue to develop new ones. This process involves growing pragmatization of meanings (semantic change) and recategorization of the item (syntactic change). The investigation of the juntives changes analyzed in this paper is based on a corpus composed of historical texts and texts of contemporary Portuguese, which comprehends the archaic (century XIII to XV), modern (XVI and XVII) and contemporary (XVIII to XXI) periods. Considering the semantic, syntactic and pragmatic factors in the reconstruction of the trajectory of grammaticalization of each one of the juntives, we can attest that the adversative and conjunctional functioning emerged in different moments in the history of Portuguese, a fact that, in contemporary Portuguese, put them in different points on the grammaticalization scale, which is: porém > todavia, contudo > entretanto > no entanto
2
Silva-Surer, Tatiana Mazza da. "Gramaticalização de juntivos adversativos na história do português /." São José do Rio Preto : [s.n.], 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/11449/86584.
Full textAbstract:
Orientador: Sebastião Carlos Leite GonçalvesBanca: Mariangêla Rios de Oliveira
Banca: Gisele Cássia de Sousa
Resumo: O objetivo geral desse trabalho é investigar a mudança sintático-semântico-pragmática dos juntivos porém, contudo, todavia, entretanto e no entanto, conjuntamente, sob a perspectiva da gramaticalização, a fim de buscar a comprovação da hipótese de uma trajetória do tipo advérbio > conjunção, por meio de análises contextuais que expliquem o surgimento do uso conjuncional adversativo na história do português. Adotamos, nesse trabalho, a concepção mais clássica de gramaticalização, a qual, segundo Hopper e Traugott (2003), prevê que itens lexicais podem, em determinados contextos, passar a assumir funções gramaticais ou, se já gramaticalizados, continuar a desenvolver novas funções gramaticais. Esse processo envolve pragmatização crescente de significados (mudança semântica) e recategorização do item (mudança sintática). A investigação das mudanças pelas quais passaram os itens por nós analisados baseia-se em um corpus composto de textos históricos e textos do português contemporâneo, compreendendo os períodos arcaico (século XIII a XV), moderno (XVI e XVII) e contemporâneo (XVIII a XXI). Considerando fatores de ordem semântica, sintática e pragmática na recomposição da trajetória de gramaticalização de cada um dos itens, podemos atestar que seus funcionamentos adversativo e conjuncional emergiram em diferentes momentos da história do português, fato que, no português contemporâneo, os colocam em diferentes pontos em uma escala de gramaticalização, a saber: porém > todavia, contudo > entretanto > no entanto
Abstract: The aim of this dissertation is to investigate the syntactic, semantic, pragmatic change of the juntives porém, contudo, todavia, entretanto and no entanto under the perspective of grammaticalization in order to search for the evidence of the hypothesis of a trajectory of the kind adverb > conjunction through contextual analysis which can explain the origin of the adversative use as a conjunction in the history of Portuguese. We adopted, in this paper, the most classical concept of grammaticalization, which, according to Hopper and Traugott (2003), foresees that lexical items can, in some contexts, assume grammatical functions or continue to develop new ones. This process involves growing pragmatization of meanings (semantic change) and recategorization of the item (syntactic change). The investigation of the juntives changes analyzed in this paper is based on a corpus composed of historical texts and texts of contemporary Portuguese, which comprehends the archaic (century XIII to XV), modern (XVI and XVII) and contemporary (XVIII to XXI) periods. Considering the semantic, syntactic and pragmatic factors in the reconstruction of the trajectory of grammaticalization of each one of the juntives, we can attest that the adversative and conjunctional functioning emerged in different moments in the history of Portuguese, a fact that, in contemporary Portuguese, put them in different points on the grammaticalization scale, which is: porém > todavia, contudo > entretanto > no entanto
Mestre
3
Botaro, Tatiana Cian [UNESP]. "Uma abordagem do funcionamento discursivo das construções adversativas sob a ótica da gramaticalização." Universidade Estadual Paulista (UNESP), 2010. http://hdl.handle.net/11449/86565.
Full textAbstract:
Made available in DSpace on 2014-06-11T19:22:19Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 0
Previous issue date: 2010-08-20Bitstream added on 2014-06-13T18:48:53Z : No. of bitstreams: 1
botaro_tc_me_sjrp.pdf: 1084587 bytes, checksum: 76a4e5cff103562c9d84c33e0c99790a (MD5)Fundação de Amparo à Pesquisa do Estado de São Paulo (FAPESP)
O objetivo deste trabalho é, a partir de uma abordagem pancrônica, estudar o funcionamento sintático-semântico-pragmático das construções adversativas do português – porém, no entanto, entretanto, contudo, todavia e só que – durante os séculos XIX e XX. Analisamos o processo de evolução dessas construções, juntamente com o processo evolutivo dos itens adversativos que fazem parte delas, tendo como parâmetro a trajetória do item prototípico mas. Essa análise tem como propósito verificar se realmente há uma tendência típica de mudança, no domínio das adversativas, em que os itens seguem de um uso predominantemente textual para um uso predominantemente interativo. Não se trata, portanto, de investigar a constituição adversativa dos itens, mas de caracterizar essas construções adversativas, instáveis por natureza, à luz de sua evolução enquanto articuladoras do texto, isto é, queremos focalizar apenas um pequeno quadro desse processo maior de mudança envolvendo os juntores adversativos. Para isso, nos baseamos em pressupostos teóricos da gramaticalização, inter-relacionados a alguns aspectos teóricos relevantes sobre junção, como hierarquia sintática e relações semânticas. Seguindo Hopper e Traugott (1993) e Heine (2003), definimos Gramaticalizçaão como um processo de mudança linguística unidirecional e gradual que focaliza o surgimento de formas e construções gramaticais, o modo como elas são usadas e o modo como elas moldam a língua. Também nos baseamos em pontos teóricos da perspectiva textual-interativa que serviram de base para explicar o funcionamento mais interacional de algumas das construções analisadas, uma vez que, segundo Jubran (2006), a perspectiva textual-interativa tem como foco de investigação a construção textual, tida como produto da interação social, juntamente com os fatores enunciativos. Com isso, essa...
This study aims at investigating, from a panchronic approach, the syntactic-semantic-pragmatic behavior of adversative constructions from the Portuguese Language – porém, no entanto, entretanto, contudo, todavia and só que (conjunctions that express the same idea as however, yet, nevertheless, but and although) – during the XIX and XX centuries. We have analyzed the evolutive process of such constructions along with the evolutive process of the adversative items that belong to them, based on the trajectory of the prototypical item “mas” (but). This analysis aims at verifying whether there really is a typical tendency for changes in the domain of adversatives, where the items change from a mainly textual usage to a mainly interactive usage. Therefore, the aim is not to investigate the adversative constitution of the items, but to characterize these adversative constructions, which are naturally unstable, in accordance with their evolution as textual articulators. In other words, we want to focus only a small part of this great process of change involving the adversative conjunctions. In order to do so, we relied upon theoretical assumptions of grammaticalization interrelated with some relevant theoretical aspects regarding junction, such as syntactic hierarchy and semantic relations. According to Hopper and Traugott (1993) and Heine (2003), we have defined Grammaticalization as a one-way gradual process of linguistic change that focuses on the appearance of grammatical forms and constructions, the way they are used and the way they mold language. We also considered theoretical points of textual-interactive perspective that worked as a basis to explain the interactional behavior of some constructions analyzed. According to Jubran (2006), the textualinteractive perspective aims at investigating textual construction, considered a product of social interaction along with... (Complete abstract click electronic access below)
4
ROCHA, ANA PAULA ANTUNES. "GRAMMATICALIZATION OF THE ADVERSATIVE CONJUNCTIONS IN PORTUGUESE: THE QUEST FOR THE CONCEPTUAL MOTIVATION OF THE PROCESS." PONTIFÍCIA UNIVERSIDADE CATÓLICA DO RIO DE JANEIRO, 2006. http://www.maxwell.vrac.puc-rio.br/Busca_etds.php?strSecao=resultado&nrSeq=9754@1.
Full textAbstract:
PONTIFÍCIA UNIVERSIDADE CATÓLICA DO RIO DE JANEIROCOORDENAÇÃO DE APERFEIÇOAMENTO DO PESSOAL DE ENSINO SUPERIOR
Este trabalho trata da motivação conceptual que levou os itens mas, porém, contudo, todavia, entretanto e no entanto, considerados pela maioria das gramáticas do português como conjunções adversativas, a passarem por um processo de gramaticalização. Apesar de ser discutível a classificação dos referidos itens como conjunções adversativas - já que, com exceção de mas, os demais não têm um comportamento sintático típico de conjunções -, considera-se o fato de que todos, de alguma forma, se tornaram mais gramaticais desde suas origens medievais até hoje. O processo de gramaticalização é entendido, então, como aquele em que tanto itens lexicais e construções formam-se em certos contextos lingüísticos para exercer funções gramaticais quanto itens gramaticais desenvolvem novas funções gramaticais (HOPPER & TRAUGOTT, 2003). O enfoque do trabalho está na busca dos elementos conceptuais que possam ter motivado o processo. Trabalhos como o de Barreto (1999) afirmam que a motivação da gramaticalização dos itens em pauta foi metonímica, por influência da presença de elementos de sentido negativo em posição adjacente à deles, no português medieval. A proposta deste trabalho é investigar por que os itens em estudo encontravam-se maciçamente, ao que parece, em ambientes que apresentavam partículas de sentido negativo. A partir da leitura de trabalhos como o de Vogt & Ducrot (1980) e o de Sweetser (1991), entende- se que mas encontrava-se nesses ambientes em função de uma motivação metafórica e que as relações contrajuntivas para cujo estabelecimento o item contribuía ocorriam proeminentemente nos domínios epistêmico e conversacional da linguagem. A mesma proposta de análise é estendida aos demais itens, que, segundo se verifica em amostras do português medieval, por funcionarem em prol da coesão do texto, eram propícios a serem empregados em contextos lingüísticos nos quais se delimitavam dois grupos de informação postos em relação. Essa relação podia ser contrajuntiva e, se não se encontrava assinalada gramaticalmente, era, ainda assim, depreensível através de uma análise das relações textuais que se davam no plano do significado lingüístico, em especial nos níveis epistêmico ou conversacional. Portanto, elementos negativos eram cabíveis nos referidos contextos e, com eles, também elementos responsáveis pela coesão textual anafórica.
In this work I deal with the conceptual motivation of the grammaticalization of the items mas, porém, todavia, entretanto e no entanto, which are classified as adversative conjunctions by the majority of the Portuguese Grammars. Though such classification is very discussable - for all of these items but mas present nontypically- conjunctional syntactical behavior - we consider the fact that all of the items cited above have become more grammatical in some manner since their medieval origins until the present days. Hence, the grammaticalization process is understood as that one in which the lexical items and constructions come in certain linguistic contexts to serve grammatical functions or how grammatical items develop new grammatical functions (HOPPER & TRAUGOTT, 2003). This work focuses the quest for the conceptual elements which could have motivated this process. Works such as Barreto´s (1999) state that the motivation for the grammaticalization of the items being studied in this text was a metonymic one, carried out by the influence of semantically negative elements which appeared next to them in the Medieval Portuguese. The objective of my work is to investigate why these items were massively found, as it seems, in contexts with negative-sense particles. From the reading of works such as Vogt´s & Ducrot´s (1980) and Sweetser´s (1991), I understand that mas was found in such contexts due to a metaphoric motivation and that the adversative relation for whose establishment it contributed occurred mainly within the epistemic domain of language. This very analysis is extended to the other items, which, according to what can be verified through the analysis of samples of the Medieval Portuguese, had the tendency of being used in contexts in which two groups of linguistic information, put into an adversative relation, were delimited, contributing for the text cohesion. This adversative relation, if not grammatically marked, was, even though, inferrible through the analysis of the textual relations which took place in the linguistic meaning plain, especially at the epistemic level. Thus, negative elements were possible in these contexts and with them, also, the elements responsible for the textual cohesion.
5
Granato, Larissa. "Operações enunciativas e ensino de línguas: estudo de noções adversativas e concessivas." Universidade Federal de São Carlos, 2011. https://repositorio.ufscar.br/handle/ufscar/5707.
Full textAbstract:
Made available in DSpace on 2016-06-02T20:25:08Z (GMT). No. of bitstreams: 1
3496.pdf: 1752989 bytes, checksum: 64dc301beb6f383c78434d208bd11d9a (MD5)
Previous issue date: 2011-02-25Financiadora de Estudos e Projetos
This paper focuses on the relations between the adversative and concessive notions that are conveyed by the conjunctions and, also, on the operations that are accomplished in the generation and in the constitutive process of the enunciations where we can find this marks. The research intents to observe how the enunciation construction and organization translate the intersubjective relations. In this way, the parlance is treated as an interaction mean and we aim to analyze its implications on the language teaching/learning process. In order to discuss this matter, we observe how students in different levels produce meaning in theirs texts. To do so, we chose theoretical proposals that we considered essential to enunciative studies, such as Theory of Enunciative Operations by Antoine Culioli, through which we intent to propose speculations around the notion concept. This author s work approaches the articulation between parlance and natural languages and, furthermore, between texts production and grammar, through the representation (the perception the subject has about himself and the world around him how he reads the world), referential (dialogue establishment through discursive materialization discursive-lexical-grammatical marks) and regulation (mediation process between interacting interlocutors) operations, which are presented as responsible for the dialogical process constitution. We emphasize, in this way, the importance to propose an enunciative grammar in the teaching process that can approach these operations. We believe that this perspective change is fundamental not only to researching purposes, but as well to teaching.
Esta pesquisa de mestrado versa sobre as relações que permeiam as noções adversativas e concessivas veiculadas pelas conjunções e sobre as operações efetuadas na geração e no processo constitutivo dos enunciados onde encontramos essas marcas. A pesquisa visa à observação de como a construção e a organização dos enunciados traduzem as relações intersubjetivas. Dessa maneira, trabalha com a linguagem como meio de interação e suas implicações no ensino/aprendizagem de língua. A fim de discutir esta questão, observamos como os alunos de diferentes níveis de ensino produzem significações em seus textos. Para tanto, como suporte teórico, recorremos a textos que consideramos essenciais aos estudos enunciativos filiados à Teoria das Operações Enunciativas proposta pelo linguista francês Antoine Culioli, por meio dos quais pretendemos levantar reflexões envolvendo o conceito de noção. O trabalho deste estudioso aborda a tese de articulação entre linguagem e línguas naturais e, por sua vez, de articulação entre produção de texto e gramática por meio de operações de representação (percepção que o sujeito tem de si mesmo e do mundo como ele lê o mundo), referenciação (instauração do diálogo pela materialização discursiva marcas léxico-gramatico-discursivas) e regulação (processo de mediação entre os interlocutores em interação), apresentadas como as responsáveis pela constituição do processo dialógico. Ressaltamos, assim, a importância de se propor, para o ensino, uma gramática enunciativa, que se caracteriza por abordar essas operações. Acreditamos que essa mudança de perspectiva seja fundamental, não só para a pesquisa, mas também para o ensino.
Books on the topic "Adversative conjunction"
1
Zhang, Yan. Adversative and Concessive Conjunctions in EFL Writing. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2021. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7837-3.
Full text
3
Morsby, Henriette. Adversative og koncessive relationer: En analyse af seks franske konjunktioner. Kbh. [i.e. Copenhagen]: Romansk institut, Københavns universitet, 1985.
Find full textBook chapters on the topic "Adversative conjunction"
1
Foolen, Ad. "THE ADVERSATIVE CONJUNCTION IN SEMANTIC THEORY AND IN THE LEXICON (ABSTRACT)." In Meaning and the lexicon, edited by G. A. J. Hoppenbrouwers, P. A. M. Seuren, and A. J. M. M. Weijters, 224. Berlin, Boston: De Gruyter, 1985. http://dx.doi.org/10.1515/9783111647425-028.
Full text
2
Zhang, Yan. "Co-occurrence Patterns of but in CLEC and BAWE-E." In Adversative and Concessive Conjunctions in EFL Writing, 85–111. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7837-3_5.
Full text
3
Zhang, Yan. "The Positioning of While-Clauses and the Implications for Understanding the Types of Logico-Semantic Relations of While." In Adversative and Concessive Conjunctions in EFL Writing, 113–48. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7837-3_6.
Full text
4
Zhang, Yan. "Analysis of however: Clause Positions and the Implications for Logico-Semantic Relations." In Adversative and Concessive Conjunctions in EFL Writing, 149–68. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7837-3_7.
Full text
5
Zhang, Yan. "Text-Based Analysis of Adversative and Concessive Conjunctions." In Adversative and Concessive Conjunctions in EFL Writing, 169–91. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7837-3_8.
Full text
6
Zhang, Yan. "Conclusion." In Adversative and Concessive Conjunctions in EFL Writing, 193–96. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7837-3_9.
Full text
7
Zhang, Yan. "Introduction." In Adversative and Concessive Conjunctions in EFL Writing, 1–7. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7837-3_1.
Full text
8
Zhang, Yan. "Conjunctions and Logico-Semantic Relations: A Review of Theoretical and Empirical Research." In Adversative and Concessive Conjunctions in EFL Writing, 9–42. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7837-3_2.
Full text
9
Zhang, Yan. "Combining Corpus-Based Description and Text-Based Analysis." In Adversative and Concessive Conjunctions in EFL Writing, 43–55. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7837-3_3.
Full text
10
Zhang, Yan. "An Overview of Adversative and Concessive Conjunctions in CLEC and BAWE-E." In Adversative and Concessive Conjunctions in EFL Writing, 57–83. Singapore: Springer Singapore, 2020. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/978-981-15-7837-3_4.
Full textConference papers on the topic "Adversative conjunction"
1
Tiskin, Daniel. "Russian Adversative Conjunctions under Asymmetric Relativisation." In 45th International Philological Conference (IPC 2016). Paris, France: Atlantis Press, 2017. http://dx.doi.org/10.2991/ipc-16.2017.130.
Full text