Books on the topic 'Aerodynamic flutter'

James P. Smith - undifferentiated. X-38 vehicle 131 flutter assessment. [Houston, Tex.]: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center, 1997.

James P. Smith - undifferentiated. X-38 vehicle 131 flutter assessment. [Houston, Tex.]: Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center, 1997.

James P. Smith - undifferentiated. X- 38 vehicle 131 flutter assessment. Washington, D.C: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1997.

James P. Smith - undifferentiated. X-38 vehicle 131 flutter assessment. [Houston, Tex.]: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Lyndon B. Johnson Space Center, 1997.

Nissim, E. Design of control laws for flutter suppression based on the aerodynamic energy concept and comparisons with other design methods. [Washington, DC]: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Office of Management, Scientific and Technical Information Division, 1990.

Nissim, E. Effect of control surface mass unbalance on the stability of a closed-loop active control system. [Washington, DC]: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Office of Management, Scientific and Technical Information Division, 1989.

Nissim, E. Control surface spanwise placement in active flutter suppression systems. [Washington, DC]: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Scientific and Technical Information Division, 1989.

Scott, Robert C. A method of predicting quasi-steady aerodynamics for flutter analysis of high speed vehicles using steady CFD calculations. Hampton, Va: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Langley Research Center, 1993.

Thompson, Scott A. Surface pressure distributions on a delta wing undergoing large amplitude pitching oscillations. Notre Dame, Ind: Dept. of Aerospace and Mechanical Engineering, University of Notre Dame, 1990.

Kehoe, M. W. Aircraft flight flutter testing at the NASA Ames-Dryden Flight Research Facility. Edwards, Calif: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Ames Research Center, Dryden Flight Research Facility, 1988.

Woods, Jessica A. Results of a parametric aeroelastic stability analysis of a generic x-wing aircraft. Hampton, Va: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Langley Research Center, 1989.

Borri, Claudio, and Claudio Mannini, eds. Aeroelastic Phenomena and Pedestrian-Structure Dynamic Interaction on Non-Conventional Bridges and Footbridges. Florence: Firenze University Press, 2010. http://dx.doi.org/10.36253/978-88-6453-202-8.

Starossek, Uwe. Brückendynamik: Winderregte Schwingungen von Seilbrücken. Braunschweig: Vieweg, 1992.

Ruhlin, Charles L. Effects of winglet on transonic flutter characteristics of a cantilevered twin-engine-transport wing model. Hampton, Va: Langley Research Center, 1986.

North Atlantic Treaty Organization. Advisory Group for Aerospace Research and Development. Future research on transonic unsteady aerodynamics and its aeroelastic applications. Neuilly sur Seine, France: AGARD, 1987.

FEDERAL AVIATION ADMINISTRATION. Flutter substantiation of transport category airplanes. Washington, D.C: U.S. Dept. of Transportation, Federal Aviation Administration, 1985.

Podboy, Gary G. Laser velocimeter measurements of the flow field generated by a forward-swept propfan during flutter. [Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1993.

Nissim, E. The effectiveness of vane-aileron excitation in the experimental determination of flutter speed by parameter identification. [Washington, D.C.]: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Office of Management, Scientific and Technical Information Division, 1990.

Physics of Forced Unsteady Separation (1990 Moffett Field, Calif.). Physics of forced unsteady separation: Proceedings of a NASA/AFOSR/ARO workshop held at NASA Ames Research Center, Moffett Field, California, April 17-19, 1990. Moffett Field, Calif: Ames Research Center, 1992.

United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration., ed. A characteristic method for calculating the generalized flat flutter aerodynamic forces. Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1988.

Center, Langley Research, ed. Some effects of aerodynamic spoilers on wing flutter. Hampton, Va: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Langley Research Center, 1989.

V, Kaza K. R., and United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration., eds. A semianalytical technique for sensitivity analysis of unsteady aerodynamic computations. [Washington, DC]: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1988.

Wing flutter boundary prediction using an unsteady Euler aerodynamic method. Hampton, Va: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Langley Research Center, 1993.

Sanford, Fleeter, and Lewis Research Center, eds. The predicted effect of aerodynamic detuning of coupled bending-torsion unstalled supersonic flutter. [Cleveland, Ohio: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Lewis Research Center, 1986.

The effect of steady aerodynamic loading on the flutter stability of turbomachinery blading. [Washington, DC]: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1991.

K, Kapania Rakesh, Barthelemy Jean-Francois M, and United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration., eds. Sensitivity analysis of flutter response of a wing incorporating finite-span corrections. [Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1994.

United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration., ed. FPCAS3D user's guide: Full potential aeroelastic program. [Washington, DC]: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1995.

United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration., ed. FPCAS3D user's guide: Full potential aeroelastic program. [Washington, DC]: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1995.

J, Usab William, and United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Scientific and Technical Information Branch., eds. Application of a linearized unsteady aerodynamic analysis to standard cascade configurations. [Washington, D.C.]: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Scientific and Technical Information Branch, 1986.

Center, Lewis Research, ed. Mass balancing of hollow fan blades. [Cleveland, Ohio: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Lewis Research Center, 1986.

ASTROP2 users manual: A program for aeroelastic stability analysis of propfans. [Washington, DC]: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1996.

Final technical report for aeroelastic analysis of counter rotation fans: NASA grant number NAG3-742; grant duration, September 1, 1986 to December 31, 1993. [Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1997.

R, Srivastava, and United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration., eds. User's guide for MSAP2D: A program for unsteady aerodynamic and aeroelastic (flutter and forced response) analysis of multistage compressors and turbines : under grant NAG3-1137. [Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1996.

Old Dominion University. Research Foundation. and United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration., eds. Aeroelastic, CFD, and dynamic computation and optimization for buffet and flutter application: Final report for the period of December 1, 1996-November 30, 1997 : under research grant NAG-1-648. Norfolk, Va: Dept. of Aerospace Engineering, College of Engineering and Technology, Old Dominion University, 1997.

Old Dominion University. Research Foundation. and United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration., eds. Aeroelastic, CFD, and dynamic computation and optimization for buffet and flutter application: Final report for the period of December 1, 1996-Novemeber 30, 1997 : under research grant NAG-1-648. Norfolk, Va: Dept. of Aerospace Engineering, College of Engineering and Technology, Old Dominion University, 1997.

Center, Langley Research, ed. Aeroelastic calculations using CFD for a typical business jet model. Hampton, Va: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Langley Research Center, 1996.

A, Bakhle Milind, and United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration., eds. Cascade flutter analysis with transient response aerodynamics. [Washington, DC]: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1991.

United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration., ed. Flutter analysis using transversality theory. [Washington, DC]: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1993.

United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration., ed. Flutter analysis using transversality theory. [Washington, DC]: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1993.

L, Soistmann D., Bennett Robert M. 1945-, and Langley Research Center, eds. Flutter analysis of highly swept delta wings by conventional methods. Hampton, Va: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Langley Research Center, 1989.

T, Batina John, Yang T. Y, and Langley Research Center, eds. A computational transonic flutter boundary tracking procedure. Hampton, Va: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Langley Research Center, 1986.

United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration., ed. Aeroelasticity of wing and wing-body configurations on parallel computers. San Jose, CA: MCAT Institute, 1995.

D, Wieseman Carol, and Langley Research Center, eds. Time simulation of flutter with large stiffness changes. Hampton, Va: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Langley Research Center, 1992.

United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration., ed. An analytical and experimental study to investigate flutter suppression via piezoelectric actuation. [Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1991.

United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration., ed. Modal interaction in linear dynamic systems near degenerate modes. [Washington, DC]: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1991.

United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Scientific and Technical Information Program., ed. Hypersonic panel flutter in a rarefied atmosphere. [Washington, D.C.]: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Office of Management, Scientific and Technical Information Program, 1993.

Center, Langley Research, ed. Two degree-of-freedom flutter solution for a personal computer. Hampton, Va: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Langley Research Center, 1985.

United States. National Aeronautics and Space Administration. Scientific and Technical Information Program., ed. Hypersonic panel flutter in a rarefied atmosphere. [Washington, D.C.]: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Office of Management, Scientific and Technical Information Program, 1993.

Improvement of method for experimental determination of flutter speed by parameter indentification: Final report. [Washington, DC: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, 1993.

Center, Langley Research, ed. Two degree-of-freedom flutter solution for a personal computer. Hampton, Va: National Aeronautics and Space Administration, Langley Research Center, 1985.